IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, H
Right arrow Articles by Ohwaki, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, H
Right arrow Articles by Ohwaki, M
Infect Immun. 1979 April; 24(1): 39-46

Immunogenicity of Bacteroides isolated from mice: relationship between immunogenicity and cell wall antigens.

H Yasui, N Yasutake and M Ohwaki

ABSTRACT

Three different strains of Bacteroides were isolated from feces and cecal contents of mice. The immunogenicity of the strains was determined by measuring the serum agglutinin titers after intraperitoneal antigen injection. There were marked differences in quantity and quality of produced antibodies among the three strains. One strain (2-2) induced low antibody titers in both the primary and secondary responses, and a significant 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME)-resistant antibody production occurred. Another strain (Y) induced low antibody titers in the primary response and high titers in the secondary response, but 2-ME-resistant antibody production did not occur. The third strain (2-4) induced very high antibody titers in both the responses, and a large amount of 2-ME-resistant antibody production occurred. Further, heat-ethanol-treated strain Y induced only immunoglobulin M antibody, but periodate-treated strain Y induced no antibody. Heat-ethanol- or periodate-treated strain 2-4 induced immunoglobulin M or G antibody, respectively. These observations suggest that the surface antigens of the two strains are distinctly different: the antigen of strain Y would be mostly O-antigen, whereas those of strain 2-4 would be O-antigen and protein moieties.


Infect Immun. 1979 April; 24(1): 39-46







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.