This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, R J
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, R J
Right arrow Articles by Smith, P F

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1980 September; 29(3): 926-933

Humoral immune response of rabbits to acholeplasmal lipoglycans.

R J Lynn, P A Guidici, E J Hollemweguer and P F Smith

ABSTRACT

Lipoglycans extracted from Acholeplasma species with hot aqueous phenol were immunogenic for rabbits when introduced by an appropriate method. All lipoglycans examined elicited antibody associated with a heavy, 2-mercaptoethanol-sensitive immunoglobulin fraction when inoculated intravenously adsorbed to autologous rabbit erythrocytes. This antibody was specific for the Acholeplasma species from which the lipoglycan was extracted. Extensive immunization of these animals with acholeplasmal lipoglycans produced significant increases in sheep erythrocyte hemolysin. Some, but not all, Acholeplasma species yielded lipoglycans that were immunogenic when emulsified with Freund complete adjuvant and introduced via the footpad into rabbits. Such animals produced antibodies corresponding to the M and G immunoglobulin classes that reacted with both homologous and heterologous acholeplasmal lipoglycans by precipitation in immunodiffusion as well as passive hemagglutination. None of the animals inoculated demonstrated a significant anamnestic response after booster injections either intravenously or via the footpads.


Infect Immun. 1980 September; 29(3): 926-933