This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Freter, R Articles by O'Brien, P C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Freter, R Articles by O'Brien, P C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1981 October; 34(1): 215-221

Role of chemotaxis in the association of motile bacteria with intestinal mucosa: chemotactic responses of Vibrio cholerae and description of motile nonchemotactic mutants.

ABSTRACT

A motile, chemotactic, Ogawa strain of Vibrio cholerae was attracted by all 20 L-amino acids tested, in contrast to Escherichia coli AW 405, which did not react to several of these. The maximum number of vibrios entering a capillary was much lower when the capillary contained carbohydrates rather than amino acids, but the minimum effective concentrations of the carbohydrates and amino acids tested were of the same order of magnitude. L-Fucose, a sugar known to inhibit the adhesion of this vibrio strain to brush border membranes, had no attraction (taxin activity) for it. A pepsin digest of rabbit mucosal scrapings or tryptone attracted vibrios as strongly as the most active amino acids. Several nonchemotactic and one nonmotile mutant were selected from the parent vibrio. The nonchemotactic mutants were indistinguishable from the parent in their ability to attach in vitro to isolated intestinal brush border membranes, whereas the nonmotile mutant had lost this ability. Parent and nonchemotactic mutants had equal growth rates in stirred and still continuous flow cultures that were maintained in an anaerobic environment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Matson, J. S., Withey, J. H., DiRita, V. J. (2007). Regulatory Networks Controlling Vibrio cholerae Virulence Gene Expression. Infect. Immun. 75: 5542-5549 [Full Text]  
• Nelson, E. J., Chowdhury, A., Harris, J. B., Begum, Y. A., Chowdhury, F., Khan, A. I., LaRocque, R. C., Bishop, A. L., Ryan, E. T., Camilli, A., Qadri, F., Calderwood, S. B. (2007). Complexity of rice-water stool from patients with Vibrio cholerae plays a role in the transmission of infectious diarrhea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19091-19096 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Silva, A. J., Leitch, G. J., Camilli, A., Benitez, J. A. (2006). Contribution of Hemagglutinin/Protease and Motility to the Pathogenesis of El Tor Biotype Cholera. Infect. Immun. 74: 2072-2079 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Correa, N. E., Klose, K. E. (2005). Characterization of Enhancer Binding by the Vibrio cholerae Flagellar Regulatory Protein FlrC. J. Bacteriol. 187: 3158-3170 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lux, R., Shi, W. (2004). CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 15: 207-220 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kojima, S., Yamamoto, K., Kawagishi, I., Homma, M. (1999). The Polar Flagellar Motor of Vibrio cholerae Is Driven by an Na+ Motive Force. J. Bacteriol. 181: 1927-1930 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Klose, K. E., Mekalanos, J. J. (1998). Differential Regulation of Multiple Flagellins in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 180: 303-316 [Abstract] [Full Text]