This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ASM journals
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosan, B
Right arrow Articles by Golub, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosan, B
Right arrow Articles by Golub, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1982 January; 35(1): 86-90

Characteristic differences between saliva-dependent aggregation and adhesion of streptococci.

B Rosan, D Malamud, B Appelbaum and E Golub

ABSTRACT

Comparison of saliva-mediated aggregation of Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus mutans and adhesion of these organisms to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite showed that there was no relationship between these two activities. Adsorption of salivary aggregating activity to bacteria appears to have little effect on the ability of the residual saliva to support adherence; conversely, adsorption of salivary adherence factors to hydroxyapatite does not affect aggregation. Although heating saliva significantly reduces bacterial aggregation, it has little or no effect on adherence. A comparison of aggregation and adhesion with serial dilutions of saliva demonstrated that adhesion could still be detected at 100 to 500-fold-lower concentrations of salivary protein that bacterial aggregation. These findings support the concept that aggregation and adherence involve two distinct mechanisms of microbial clearance in the oral cavity.


Infect Immun. 1982 January; 35(1): 86-90




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Resan, B., Hammond, B. F. (2000). A Philadelphia Story-Featuring Ned Williams: Microbiology at the University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine. JDR 79: 1451-1457  
  • Liljemark, W.F., Bloomquist, C. (1996). Human Oral Microbial Ecology and Dental Caries and Periodontal Diseases. CROBM 7: 180-198 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hajishengallis, G., Koga, T., Russell, M.W. (1994). Affinity and Specificity of the Interactions between Streptococcus mutans Antigen I/II and Salivary Components. JDR 73: 1493-1502 [Abstract]  
  • Scannapieco, F. A. (1994). Saliva-Bacterium Interactions in Oral Microbial Ecology. CROBM 5: 203-248 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Robinovitch, M.R., Malamud, D., Rosan, B., Golub, E.E., Lancy, P. Jr (1986). Identification of a Streptococcus sanguis Receptor for Salivary Agglutinins. JDR 65: 98-104 [Abstract]  
  • Ellen, R.P., Sivendra, R. (1985). In vitro Attachment, Salivary Agglutination, and Surface Fibril Density of Fresh Actinomyces Isolates from Two Distinct Oral Surfaces. JDR 64: 799-803 [Abstract]