This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R J
Right arrow Articles by Etherden, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibbons, R J
Right arrow Articles by Etherden, I

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1983 September; 41(3): 1190-1196

Comparative hydrophobicities of oral bacteria and their adherence to salivary pellicles.

R J Gibbons and I Etherden

ABSTRACT

Oral bacteria were found to differ in their surface hydrophobicities as determined by their ability to adsorb to hexadecane. Strains of Actinomyces viscosus, A. naeslundii, Streptococcus sanguis, S. mitis, and Bacteroides gingivalis proved highly hydrophobic. Strains of B. intermedius, S. salivarius, S. mutans, and B. melaninogenicus were less hydrophobic, whereas strains of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans were hydrophilic. An overall correlation was noted between the adsorption of bacteria to hexadecane and their numbers which attached to experimental salivary pellicles formed on hydroxyapatite surfaces. This suggests that hydrophobic bonding plays an important role in this process. Pellicles prepared from saliva which had been extracted with chloroform-methanol to remove lipids adsorbed comparable numbers of S. sanguis and A. viscosus and increased numbers of S. mutans. Analyses of adsorption isotherms indicated that pellicles formed from lipid-depleted saliva contained increased numbers of binding sites for the S. mutans strains studied, and this likely accounts for their enhanced adsorption. Absorption of saliva with 10% octyl or phenyl Sepharose reduced the protein content of saliva by almost half, but the numbers of bacteria which attached to pellicles prepared from such absorbed saliva were similar to or higher than those which attached to control pellicles. These observations suggest that saliva does not contain unique highly hydrophobic salivary macromolecules which serve as essential pellicle receptors for the bacteria studied. The data obtained are consistent with the view that hydrophobic bonding together with interactions between complementary molecules are involved in bacterial attachment to salivary pellicles on teeth.


Infect Immun. 1983 September; 41(3): 1190-1196




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Davey, M. E., Duncan, M. J. (2006). Enhanced Biofilm Formation and Loss of Capsule Synthesis: Deletion of a Putative Glycosyltransferase in Porphyromonas gingivalis.. J. Bacteriol. 188: 5510-5523 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bowden, G.H.W., Li, Y.H. (1997). Nutritional Influences on Biofilm Development. ADR 11: 81-99 [Abstract]  
  • Scannapieco, F. A. (1994). Saliva-Bacterium Interactions in Oral Microbial Ecology. CROBM 5: 203-248 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kuramitsu, H. K. (1993). Virulence Factors of Mutans Streptococci: Role of Molecular Genetics. CROBM 4: 159-176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jansen, B., Peters, G., Pulverer, G. (1987). Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Bacterial Adhesion to Polymers. J Biomater Appl 2: 520-543 [Abstract]  
  • Cowan, M.M., Taylor, K.G., Doyle, R.J. (1986). Kinetic Analysis of Streptococcus sanguis Adhesion to Artificial Pellicle. JDR 65: 1278-1283 [Abstract]  
  • Gibbons, R.J., Etherden, I., Moreno, E.C. (1985). Contribution of Stereochemical Interactions in the Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguis C5 to Experimental Pellicles. JDR 64: 96-101 [Abstract]  
  • Gibbons, R.J. (1984). Microbial Ecology Adherent Interactions Which May Affect Microbial Ecology in the Mouth. JDR 63: 378-385 [Abstract]