IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, S E
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, P F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by West, S E
Right arrow Articles by Sparling, P F

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1985 February; 47(2): 388-394

Response of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to iron limitation: alterations in expression of membrane proteins without apparent siderophore production.

S E West and P F Sparling

ABSTRACT

For acquisition of iron, an essential nutrient, most microorganisms produce siderophores (low-molecular-weight iron-chelating compounds) and membrane proteins to serve as receptors for the iron-siderophore complexes. The gonococcus does not appear to produce a siderophore, since the quantity of siderophore detected by bioassays of culture supernatants from strains F62 and FA19 was never greater than the amount present in the uninoculated medium. Iron limitation of the laboratory strains F62 and FA19 and 12 recent clinical isolates resulted in the expression of several iron-repressible membrane proteins. The expression of proteins in the apparent molecular weight range of 70,000 to 100,000 was strain dependent. All strains expressed 36,000-dalton (36K) and 19.5K proteins. FA19 and F62 were also grown in medium containing iron sources commonly encountered in vivo (i.e., transferrin, lactoferrin, hemoglobin, or hemin). Comparison of growth rates indicates that transferrin and lactoferrin were more readily utilized as iron sources than hemin and hemoglobin were. Expression of the iron-repressible proteins varied depending upon the iron source. Fewer iron-repressible proteins were observed when cells were supplied with transferrin or lactoferrin than when the cultures were grown with either hemin or hemoglobin. The 36K protein was expressed with all four iron sources.

Infect Immun. 1985 February; 47(2): 388-394




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.