IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Plager, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Plager, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1972 May; 5(5): 783-791
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Time Relationships Between Injection of Antigen and Adjuvant III. Adjuvancy of Bordetella pertussis Given at Various Times After the Primary Antigenic Stimulus

H. Finger, P. Emmerling and L. Plager

Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

ABSTRACT

The adjuvant activity of Bordetella pertussis was investigated, both at the cellular and humoral levels, when the bacterial adjuvant was given at various times after the primary antigenic stimulus of both 2 x 107 (suboptimal dose) and 4 x 108 (optimal dose) of sheep erythrocytes. In all experiments, both adjuvant and sheep erythrocytes were administered by the intraperitoneal route. Adjuvant activity was measured on the basis of the early and late phases of the primary response and on the degree of priming for the secondary immune reaction. A maximal adjuvant activity was found in mice which had received B. pertussis vaccine simultaneously with the antigen. Adjuvant effectiveness became less as the time interval between the injection of antigen and adjuvant increased. Adjuvancy also depended on the amount of antigen used as the primary antigenic stimulus. With 4 x 108 sheep erythrocytes, significantly increased priming for the secondary response was produced only when B. pertussis cells were administered within a period of 24 hr. When the bacterial adjuvant was administered either 48 or 72 hr after the primary antigenic stimulus, adjuvancy was found to be limited to the late phase of the primary response and to the prolonged development of antibody-forming cells during the secondary immune reaction. In contrast, significantly enhanced priming for the secondary response was detectable when the adjuvant was administered as late as 48 hr after primary immunization with 2 x 107 sheep erythrocytes. When the bacterial adjuvant was administered either 6, 24, 48, or 72 hr after the primary immunization with 2 x 107 sheep erythrocytes, the early phase of the primary 19S and 7S hemolysin response was found to be suppressed, and adjuvancy became detectable only thereafter.


Infect Immun. 1972 May; 5(5): 783-791
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.