IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyerly, D M
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, T D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyerly, D M
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, T D
Infect Immun. 1986 October; 54(1): 70-76

Characterization of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile with monoclonal antibodies.

D M Lyerly, C J Phelps, J Toth and T D Wilkins

ABSTRACT

Two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were used to learn more about the structures of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. One of the antibodies, the PCG-4 MAb, reacted specifically with toxin A. This MAb precipitated toxin A and neutralized the enterotoxic but not the cytotoxic activity of the toxin. The site to which the antibody bound was resistant to denaturation with sodium dodecyl sulfate; however, it was destroyed by N-bromosuccinimide. Immunoblot analysis with the PCG-4 MAb revealed the presence of a large number of bands in preparations of denatured toxin A, suggesting that toxin A exists as an aggregate of smaller components. The antibody was covalently coupled to Affi-Gel 10, and the gel was used to purify toxin A from the culture filtrate of a highly toxigenic strain of C. difficile by immunoaffinity chromatography. The second antibody, the G-2 MAb, cross-reacted with toxins A and B. The cross-reaction was confirmed by immunoblot analysis. These results show that toxins A and B share an epitope and suggest that they have a common subunit. The G-2 MAb did not neutralize or precipitate either toxin. The site to which the G-2 MAb bound was partially destroyed by sodium dodecyl sulfate and was resistant to oxidation with N-bromosuccinimide.


Infect Immun. 1986 October; 54(1): 70-76




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.