IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elkins, K L
Right arrow Articles by Baker, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elkins, K L
Right arrow Articles by Baker, P J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1987 December; 55(12): 3093-3102

Mechanisms of specific immunological unresponsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharides.

K L Elkins, P W Stashak and P J Baker

Laboratory of Microbial Immunity, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

ABSTRACT

Low-dose priming of mice with Escherichia coli O113 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) results in the development of immunological memory, whereas low-dose priming with E. coli O55 LPS or Serratia marcescens LPS induces significant antigen-specific unresponsiveness. All three preparations of LPS induced proliferation of mouse splenocytes with similar time course and [3H]thymidine uptake. There was no correlation between the small amounts of serum antibody detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay after low-dose priming and the subsequent generation of either memory or unresponsiveness. Further, the passive transfer of small amounts of LPS-specific antibody had no significant effect on the magnitude of the plaque-forming cell (PFC) response elicited after subsequent immunization. Reduction of the PFC response to E. coli O55 LPS occurred after low-dose priming of nu/nu (as well as nu/+) mice; however, unresponsiveness could not be generated in nu/nu mice by low-dose priming with S. marcescens LPS. Thus, although the development of low-dose unresponsiveness to S. marcescens LPS appears to involve T cells, the response of E. coli O55 LPS does not. Enhancement of the primary PFC response to S. marcescens LPS could be transferred with low-dose primed spleen cells depleted of Lyt-2+ T cells; this suggests that the magnitude of the PFC response to this preparation of LPS is negatively influenced by Lyt-2+ T cells and positively influenced by Lyt-2- spleen cells (i.e., L3T4+ T cells). These findings indicate that T cells appear to be involved in regulating the magnitude of the antibody response to some types of bacterial LPS.


Infect Immun. 1987 December; 55(12): 3093-3102







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.