IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamamoto, Y
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1987 June; 55(6): 1369-1374

Differential growth of Legionella pneumophila in guinea pig versus mouse macrophage cultures.

Y Yamamoto, T W Klein, C A Newton, R Widen and H Friedman

ABSTRACT

Legionella pneumophila is a facultative intracellular bacterium which replicated well in inbred guinea pig strain 2 peritoneal macrophages at a low infectivity ratio. In contrast, the growth of this organism was markedly restricted in mouse (BDF1) peritoneal macrophages, even at a relatively high infectivity ratio. The initial uptake of L. pneumophila organisms by macrophages was similar in both animal species, and both groups of macrophages supported the growth of Listeria monocytogenes. Treatment of L. pneumophila with immune guinea pig serum did not result in restriction of bacterial growth in macrophages, but guinea pig macrophages were readily induced to suppress the growth of L. pneumophila by preincubation with supernatants obtained from mitogen-activated normal guinea pig splenocyte cultures. Thus, lymphokines generated from mitogen-stimulated guinea pig lymphocytes induced a restriction of growth of these organisms similar to that observed naturally with macrophages from mice, which are considered highly resistant to these bacteria. Although guinea pigs are considered highly susceptible to L. pneumophila infections and mice are considered relatively resistant, the mechanism of this difference is not clear. The results of the present study suggest that the restriction of L. pneumophila growth by macrophages relates to host susceptibility to infection and that cell populations permissive for L. pneumophila can be transformed to nonpermissive by products from stimulated lymphocytes but not by opsonization with immune serum.


Infect Immun. 1987 June; 55(6): 1369-1374




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.