IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Der Vartanian, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Der Vartanian, M

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1988 February; 56(2): 413-418

Differences in excretion and efficiency of the aerobactin and enterochelin siderophores in a bovine pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli.

M Der Vartanian

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches de Clermont-Ferrand Theix, Ceyrat, France.

ABSTRACT

Secretion of aerobactin is thought to play an important part in the virulence of invasive Escherichia coli also capable of synthesizing enterochelin. Why, despite its markedly lower affinity for iron than that of enterochelin, aerobactin proves to be the predominant active siderophore for bacterial growth in transferrin was investigated. We studied the action of two iron chelators, 2,2'-dipyridyl and transferrin, in expression of the aerobactin and enterochelin genes. Specifically, we describe the sequential localization of the two siderophores in the cell compartments during bacterial growth under different iron limitation conditions. Our results demonstrated that, whatever the exogenous iron-chelating agent used, aerobactin was rapidly excreted, whereas enterochelin accumulated early in periplasm before its very belated release into the external medium. This work also showed that the advantage of aerobactin over enterochelin in competition with transferrin was not due to (i) lack of enterochelin activity, (ii) a cell-bound aerobactin-dependent mechanism, (iii) antagonism between the two siderophores, and probably (iv) genetic preferential induction of aerobactin. We propose that the superiority of aerobactin in competing with transferrin for iron(III) was a consequence of its more rapid excretion with respect to enterochelin. In contrast to transferrin, 2,2'-dipyridyl induced a greater efficiency of enterochelin, possibly by a more permanent function as iron-binding compounds in the bacterial envelope. In summary, unlike aerobactin, enterochelin appears to be a weakly secreted high-affinity iron ligand.


Infect Immun. 1988 February; 56(2): 413-418




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.