IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Youmans, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Youmans, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Youmans, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Youmans, G. P.
Infect Immun. 1972 November; 6(5): 798-804
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Polybasic Amines on the Immunogenicity of Mycobacterial Ribonucleic Acid

Anne S. Youmans and Guy P. Youmans

1 Department of Microbiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611

ABSTRACT

The five polybasic amines, methylated bovine serum albumin (MBSA), protamine sulfate, neomycin sulfate, streptomycin sulfate, and diethylaminoethyl-dextran (DEAE-dextran), were examined to determine their effects on the immunogenic activity of mycobacterial ribonucleic acid (RNA) preparations, and whether they could substitute for Freund incomplete adjuvant (FIA) by protecting the mycobacterial RNA in vivo. These compounds were either emulsified in FIA or not emulsified in FIA. Different results were obtained when these compounds, complexed with mycobacterial RNA, were emulsified in FIA. MBSA, in ratios of mycobacterial RNA-MBSA of 1:0.2 to 1:0.4, had no effect on immunogenic activity. However, when the ratio was increased to 1:1, 1:2, or to 1:4, marked inhibition of the immunogenic activity occurred. Protamine sulfate and neomycin sulfate also inhibited the immunogenic activity of mycobacterial RNA; however, neither streptomycin sulfate nor DEAE-dextran had any effect on immunogenic activity. Without being emulsified in FIA, these five polybasic amines, with the exception of DEAE-dextran, acted only as weak adjuvants for mycobacterial RNA and, therefore, could not be used as substitutes for FIA for the protection of mycobacterial RNA from host nucleases. DEAE-dextran, although not as effective as FIA, afforded some protection for the mycobacterial RNA. DEAE-dextran alone also produced a low degree of nonspecific immunity against tuberculosis. Since MBSA, protamine sulfate, and neomycin sulfate reduce the biological activity of mycobacterial RNA after complexing with it, it is probable that these compounds "mask" the immunogenic sites on the mycobacterial RNA structure.


Infect Immun. 1972 November; 6(5): 798-804
Copyright © 1972 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1972 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.