IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, D L
Right arrow Articles by Burne, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wexler, D L
Right arrow Articles by Burne, R A
Infect Immun. 1993 April; 61(4): 1259-1267

Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase (ftf) and glucosyltransferase (gtfBC) operon fusion strains in continuous culture.

D L Wexler, M C Hudson and R A Burne

Department of Dental Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York 14642.

ABSTRACT

Three glucosyltransferases (GTFs), which catalyze the formation of water-insoluble adherent glucans, and fructosyltransferase (FTF), which synthesizes fructans, are believed to contribute to the pathogenic potential of Streptococcus mutans. Study of the regulation of expression of GTF and FTF has been difficult because of the complexity and number of exoenzymes produced by this bacterium. By using continuous chemostat culture to control environmental conditions, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) operon fusions were utilized to measure transcriptional activity of the ftf and gtfBC gene promoters. Expression of these operon fusions was differentially regulated in response to culture pH and growth rate and during transition states between growth domains. Furthermore, the addition of sucrose to steady-state cultures resulted in significant increases in CAT specific activities for both fusions. In a few cases, GTF and FTF enzyme specific activities did not parallel those of the corresponding CAT fusion activities; this lack of correspondence was likely due to posttranscriptional events controlling enzyme secretion and enzyme activity, as well as to the differential expression of dextranase(s) and fructan hydrolase by S. mutans. These results clearly demonstrate that the extracellular polymer synthesis machinery of S. mutans is regulated in a complex manner. The use of operon fusions in combination with chemostat culture is a viable approach to analyzing gene expression in S. mutans and will be helpful in defining the molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of expression of virulence attributes under conditions that may more closely mimic those in dental plaque.

Infect Immun. 1993 April; 61(4): 1259-1267




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.