IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muthukkumar, S
Right arrow Articles by Muthukkaruppan, V R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muthukkumar, S
Right arrow Articles by Muthukkaruppan, V R
Infect Immun. 1993 July; 61(7): 3017-3025

Mechanism of protective immunity induced by porin-lipopolysaccharide against murine salmonellosis.

S Muthukkumar and V R Muthukkaruppan

Department of Immunology, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

ABSTRACT

Investigations were undertaken to characterize the protective immunity induced by porin-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) against Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice. Mice immunized with porin-LPS showed higher levels of antiporin immunoglobulin G than mice which received porin alone. Further, T cells from porin-LPS-immunized mice showed an augmented proliferative response to porin in vitro compared with the response of T cells from porin-injected animals. The passive transfer of anti-LPS antibodies conferred significant protection (17%), while antiporin serum failed to protect mice against lethal challenge, indicating the protective ability of anti-LPS antibodies. However, the transfer of serum obtained from porin-LPS-immunized mice resulted in better protection (30%) than did anti-LPS or antiporin antibodies alone. In contrast to LPS, monophosphoryl lipid A completely failed to induce protection against lethal infection. However, comparable to the effect of LPS, injection of porin with monophosphoryl lipid A enhanced antibody response and the protective ability of porin (81.25%). The transfer of T cells from porin-LPS-immunized mice provided higher levels of protection (47%) against lethal challenge than did T cells from porin-immunized mice (23%). The combination of T cells and serum from porin-immunized mice transferred 36% protection. However, a combination of T cells and serum from porin-LPS-immunized mice conferred the highest level of protection (92%), which was reflected by the number of survivors (100%) in the porin-LPS-immunized group. These results demonstrate that besides the protective effect of anti-LPS antibodies, the ability of LPS to augment humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to porin confers effective protection against Salmonella infection.


Infect Immun. 1993 July; 61(7): 3017-3025




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.