IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messick, J B
Right arrow Articles by Rikihisa, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messick, J B
Right arrow Articles by Rikihisa, Y
Infect Immun. 1993 September; 61(9): 3803-3810

Characterization of Ehrlichia risticii binding, internalization, and proliferation in host cells by flow cytometry.

J B Messick and Y Rikihisa

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1092.

ABSTRACT

The binding, internalization, and proliferation of Ehrlichia risticii in P388D1 cells and equine polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes were studied by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometric analysis. The binding of ehrlichiae to P388D1 cells at 4 degrees C was dose dependent, and the antigens of bound organisms were susceptible to pronase treatment. Additionally, the binding of ehrlichiae to P388D1 cells was diminished when either P388D1 cells or ehrlichiae were treated with 1% paraformaldehyde for 30 min or 0.25% trypsin for 15 min. These results indicate that the ehrlichial ligand and host cell receptor are likely surface proteins. Following incubation at 37 degrees C, bound E. risticii and/or its antigens were removed with pronase and indirect immunofluorescent staining in the presence of saponin was used to examine intracellular ehrlichiae. Our results indicate that E. risticii was internalized into P388D1 cells within 3 h and proliferated by 48 h of incubation. The microfilament-disrupting agent cytochalasin D and the transglutaminase inhibitor monodansylcadaverine were used to differentiate between phagocytosis (sensitive to cytochalasin) and receptor-mediated endocytosis (sensitive to monodansylcadaverine) of E. risticii by P388D1 cells. In concentrations that produced distinctive morphological changes and inhibited phagocytosis of polystyrene latex beads, cytochalasin D did not suppress the infectivity of E. risticii. Binding, internalization, or proliferation of E. risticii was not affected by cytochalasin D. However, monodansylcadaverine inhibited infection of E. risticii in a dose-dependent manner. The agent did not affect the attachment of ehrlichiae to host cells, but it did suppress internalization and proliferation. These results suggest that E. risticii is internalized by receptor-mediated endocytosis and that productive infection by E. risticii does not depend on phagocytosis by the P388D1 cells. Although E. risticii did not bind to the surface of equine PMN leukocytes at 4 degrees C, organisms were taken up by this cell at 37 degrees C. E. risticii, however, failed to survive in equine PMN leukocytes.


Infect Immun. 1993 September; 61(9): 3803-3810




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.