IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nabors, G S
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, J P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nabors, G S
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, J P
Infection and Immunity, September 1994, p. 3655-3662, Vol. 62, No. 9
0019-9567/1994/$04.00+0     DOI:

research-article

Site-specific immunity to Leishmania major in SWR mice: the site of infection influences susceptibility and expression of the antileishmanial immune response.

G S Nabors and J P Farrell

Department of Pathobiology, University of Pennsylvania-School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia 19104.

ABSTRACT

Inbred strains of mice usually develop either of two divergent patterns of infection in response to Leishmania major. Resistant mice, which develop self-limiting infections, respond immunologically with the activation of gamma interferon-secreting Th1 helper T cells, while nonhealing infections in susceptible mice are characterized by the proliferation of interleukin-4-secreting Th2 cells. Development of these divergent responses is dependent primarily on the strain of mouse infected, although factors such as the infective dose, species, and strain of parasite can also influence the degree of resistance. In this study, we show that a single mouse strain, SWR, can develop totally divergent patterns of infection depending on the site of parasite inoculation. Both SWR mice and highly susceptible BALB/c mice developed progressive, ultimately fatal disease when inoculated in the dorsal skin over the base of the tail. However, SWR mice infected in the hind footpad developed far less severe infections, which were for the most part controlled, whereas BALB/c mice infected in this site developed severe, nonhealing lesions. Production of gamma interferon and interleukin-4 and measurement of immunoglobulin E levels in serum were used to assess the degree of Th1 and Th2 cell activation in infected mice. Cytokine profiles early in infection had characteristics of a mixed Th1-Th2 response and were similar in SWR mice infected at either site. These early cytokine responses were not predictive of the ultimate disease outcome, since lymph node cells from healing mice eventually produced higher levels of gamma interferon than did those from nonhealing mice, and healing mice had lower levels of immunoglobulin E in serum, suggesting a functional bias toward Th1 cell activity in these animals. The differential ability of SWR mice to heal infections at different cutaneous sites provides a new model for the study of resistance to cutaneous leishmaniasis. Unlike traditional models of infection in which resistant and susceptible strains of mice are compared, this model allows for the study of factors that contribute to healing and nonhealing infections in a genetically identical strain of mouse.


Infection and Immunity, September 1994, p. 3655-3662, Vol. 62, No. 9
0019-9567/1994/$04.00+0     DOI:




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.