Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 1999, p. 6543-6549, Vol. 67, No. 12
Departments of
Microbiology1 and Oral
Biology,2 University of Alabama at Birmingham,
Birmingham, Alabama 35294, and Department of Immunology,
Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, Massachusetts
021153
Received 28 June 1999/Returned for modification 11 August
1999/Accepted 21 September 1999
Here we present the construction and characterization of a chimeric
vaccine protein combining the glucan-binding domain (GLU) of the
gtfB-encoded water-insoluble glucan-synthesizing
glucosyltransferase enzyme (GTF-I) from Streptococcus
mutans and thioredoxin from Escherichia coli, which
increases the solubility of coexpressed recombinant
proteins and stimulates proliferation of murine T cells. The protective
potential of intranasal (i.n.) immunization with this
chimeric immunogen was compared to that of the GLU polypeptide alone in
a mouse infection model. Both immunogens were able to induce
statistically significant mucosal (salivary and vaginal) and serum
responses (P < 0.01) which were sustained to the end of the study (experimental day 100). Following infection with S. mutans, sham-immunized mice maintained high levels of this cariogenic organism (~60% of the total oral streptococci) for at
least 5 weeks. In contrast, animals immunized with the thioredoxin-GLU chimeric protein (Thio-GLU) showed significant reduction (>85%) in
S. mutans colonization after 3 weeks (P < 0.05). The animals immunized with GLU alone required 5 weeks to
demonstrate significant reduction (>50%) of S. mutans
infection (P < 0.05). Evaluation of dental caries
activity at the end of the study showed that mice immunized with either
Thio-GLU or GLU had significantly fewer carious lesions in the
buccal enamel or dentinal surfaces than the sham-immunized animals
(P < 0.01). The protective effects against S. mutans colonization and caries activity following i.n. immunization with GLU or Thio-GLU are attributed to the induced salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-GLU responses. Although in general
Thio-GLU was not significantly better than GLU alone in stimulating
salivary IgA responses and in protection against dental caries, the
finding that the GLU polypeptide alone, in the absence of any
immunoenhancing agents, is protective against disease offers a
promising and safe strategy for the development of a vaccine against caries.
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Protective Immunity against Streptococcus mutans
Infection in Mice after Intranasal Immunization with the
Glucan-Binding Region of S. mutans
Glucosyltransferase
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 845 South 19th, BBRB 258, Birmingham, AL 35294-2170. Phone: (205) 934-3470. Fax: (205) 934-1426. E-mail: suemich{at}uab.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|