IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birkness, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, F. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birkness, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, F. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, September 1999, p. 4895-4901, Vol. 67, No. 9
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0

Observed Differences in Virulence-Associated Phenotypes between a Human Clinical Isolate and a Veterinary Isolate of Mycobacterium avium

Kristin A. Birkness,1 W. Edward Swords,1 Pei-Hsiu Huang,1 Elizabeth H. White,2 Charlene S. Dezzutti,1 Renu B. Lal,1 and Frederick D. Quinn1,*

Division of AIDS, STD and TB Laboratory Research,1 and Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases,2 National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333

Received 17 December 1998/Returned for modification 26 February 1999/Accepted 15 June 1999

Mycobacterium avium, the most common opportunistic pathogen in patients with AIDS, is frequently isolated from a variety of environmental sources, but rarely can these environmental isolates be epidemiologically linked with isolates known to cause human disease. Using a number of in vitro tissue culture assays, we found significant pathogenic differences between a serotype 4 human clinical M. avium isolate and a serotype 2 veterinary isolate. Cell association of the patient strain with a human intestinal cell line was 1.7 times that of the veterinary strain. Growth of this clinical strain in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages increased from 12-fold higher than that of the veterinary isolate after 2 days to 200-fold higher after 4 days. By the conclusion of each experiment, lysis of all examined host cell types and accumulation of cell debris were observed in infections with the human isolate, but monolayers remained relatively intact in the presence of the animal isolate. The two strains also differed in the ability to stimulate human immunodeficiency virus replication in coinfected host cells, with p24 antigen levels after 6 days threefold higher in the cells coinfected with the clinical strain than in those infected with the veterinary strain. If the genetic differences responsible for the phenotypes observed in these assays can be identified and characterized, it may be possible to determine which M. avium strains in the environment are potential human pathogens.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bldg. 5, Rm. B38, M/S G11, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-3205. Fax: (404) 639-4192. E-mail: fdq1{at}cdc.gov.


Infection and Immunity, September 1999, p. 4895-4901, Vol. 67, No. 9
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.