Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2001, p. 988-995, Vol. 69, No. 2
Division of Infectious Disease and Tropical Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics,1 and Division
of Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine,2
Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School
of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201; Acambis,
Inc.,
Received 19 September 2000/Returned for modification 25 October
2000/Accepted 16 November 2000
Clostridium difficile is a major cause of nosocomial
diarrhea in industrialized countries. Although most
illnesses respond to available therapy, infection can increase
morbidity, prolong hospitalization, and produce
life-threatening colitis. Vaccines are being explored as an
alternative means for protecting high-risk individuals. We
assessed the safety, immunogenicity, and dose response of a parenteral
vaccine containing C. difficile toxoids A and B. Thirty healthy adults were assigned to receive four spaced inoculations
on days 1, 8, 30, and 60 with one of three doses of vaccine (6.25, 25, or 100 µg). At each dose level, subjects were randomized, in a
double-blind fashion, to receive either the soluble toxoids
(n = 5) or toxoids adsorbed to alum
(n = 5). Subjects were monitored for clinical and
immunologic responses to vaccination. Vaccination was generally well
tolerated, with occasional, usually mild, systemic reactions (abdominal
pain, arthralgia, and diarrhea). The most common local
reaction, mild arm pain, was reported by all recipients of the
toxoid-alum formulation. Nearly all subjects (
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.988-995.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Safety and Immunogenicity of Increasing Doses of a
Clostridium difficile Toxoid Vaccine Administered to
Healthy Adults

Cambridge, Massachusetts
021393; and University Health
Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
207424
90%) developed
vigorous serum antibody responses to both toxins, as measured by
immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and
neutralization of cytotoxicity, whereas fecal IgA increases occurred in
approximately 50%. Statistically significant effects of dose and
formulation on immunogenicity were not seen, although antibody levels
tended to be higher with the alum-adjuvanted formulations and with
increasing doses of soluble toxoid. Serum antibody responses among the
toxoid-alum group appeared to plateau at 25 µg. We concluded that the
C. difficile toxoid vaccine is safe and immunogenic in
healthy volunteers. Further development as a prophylactic vaccine or
for producing C. difficile hyperimmune globulin is justified.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for
Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 W. Baltimore St., HSF 480, Baltimore MD 21201. Phone: (410) 706-5328. Fax:: (410) 706-6205. E-mail:
kkotloff{at}medicine.umaryland.edu.
Present address: Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories, Jamaica
Plain, MA 02130.
Formerly OraVax, Inc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»