This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhaskar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bhaskar, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, January 2009, p. 223-231, Vol. 77, No. 1
0019-9567/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00526-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of "Mycobacterium w" against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice Immunized with Live versus Heat-Killed M. w by the Aerosol or Parenteral Route{triangledown}

Ankan Gupta,1,{dagger} Nishamol Geetha,1,{dagger},{ddagger} Jiju Mani,1 Pramod Upadhyay,1 V. M. Katoch,2 M. Natrajan,2 U. D. Gupta,2 and Sangeeta Bhaskar1*

National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India,1 National JALMA Institute for Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Tajganj, Agra, UP 282001, India2

Received 29 April 2008/ Returned for modification 23 June 2008/ Accepted 26 October 2008

As the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis continues to be a burden, there is a concerted effort to find new vaccines to combat this problem. One of the important vaccine strategies is whole bacterial vaccines. This approach relies on multiple antigens and built-in adjuvanticity. Other mycobacterial strains which share cross-reactive antigens with M. tuberculosis have been considered as alternatives to M. bovis for vaccine use. One such strain, "Mycobacterium w", had been evaluated for its immunomodulatory properties in leprosy. A vaccine against leprosy based on killed M. w is approved for human use, where it has resulted in clinical improvement, accelerated bacterial clearance, and increased immune responses to Mycobacterium leprae antigens. M. w shares antigens not only with M. leprae but also with M. tuberculosis, and initial studies have shown that vaccination with killed M. w induces protection against tuberculosis in Mycobacterium bovis BCG responder, as well as BCG nonresponder, strains of mice. Hence, we further studied the protective potential of M. w and the underlying immune responses in the mouse model of tuberculosis. We analyzed the protective efficacy of M. w immunization in both live and killed forms through the parenteral route and by aerosol immunization, compared with that of BCG. Our findings provide evidence that M. w has potential protective efficacy against M. tuberculosis. M. w activates macrophage activity, as well as lymphocytes. M. w immunization by both the parenteral route and aerosol adminstration gives higher protection than BCG given by the parenteral route in the mouse model of tuberculosis.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Product Development Cell, National Institute of Immunology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India. Phone: 91-11-26703670. Fax: 91-11-26162125. E-mail: sangeeta{at}nii.res.in

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 3 November 2008.

Editor: J. L. Flynn

{dagger} These authors contributed equally to this work.

{ddagger} Present address: Department of Vascular Biology. Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.


Infection and Immunity, January 2009, p. 223-231, Vol. 77, No. 1
0019-9567/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/IAI.00526-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.