Previous Article | Next Article 
Infect Immun, January 1998, p. 356-360, Vol. 66, No. 1
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Molecular Epidemiology of Staphylococcus
aureus and Enterococcus faecalis in
Endophthalmitis
Mary C.
Booth,1,*
Kenneth L.
Hatter,1
Darlene
Miller,2
Janet
Davis,2
Regis
Kowalski,3
David W.
Parke,1
James
Chodosh,1
Bradley D.
Jett,1
Michelle C.
Callegan,1
Rebecca
Penland,4 and
Michael
S.
Gilmore1
Department of Ophthalmology and Dean A. McGee
Eye Institute, Molecular Pathogenesis of Eye Infection Research
Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma1;
Department of
Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami
School of Medicine, Miami, Florida2;
The Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh School
of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3; and
Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,
Texas4
Received 11 July 1997/Returned for modification 3 September
1997/Accepted 15 October 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Genomic DNA fingerprint analysis was performed on 39 Staphylococcus aureus and 28 Enterococcus
faecalis endophthalmitis isolates collected from multiple
clinical centers. Among 21 S. aureus genomic DNA
fingerprint patterns identified, five clonotypes were recovered from
multiple unrelated patients and accounted for 58.9% (23 of 39) of the
isolates analyzed. Compared with strains having unique genomic DNA
fingerprint patterns, the S. aureus clonotypes occurring more than once were more likely to result in visual acuities of 20/200
or worse (P = 0.036 [
2 test]). In
contrast to the S. aureus isolates, the E. faecalis endophthalmitis isolates were a clonally diverse
population, enriched for the expression of a known toxin, cytolysin,
which is plasmid encoded.
 |
TEXT |
Infectious endophthalmitis is
a sight-threatening clinical crisis that occurs as a
complication of ocular surgery (postoperative endophthalmitis) or
penetrating ocular injury (posttraumatic endophthalmitis). The
severity of vision loss in endophthalmitis is related to the pathogenic potential of the infecting organism (7, 19,
25-29, 33). Coagulase-negative staphylococci are generally
associated with final visual acuities of 20/40 or better, whereas in
endophthalmitis caused by more virulent organisms such as
Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, or
Bacillus cereus, visual outcomes ranging from 20/100 to
enucleation occur in approximately 50 to 90% of cases (1, 5,
7). Despite a general association between visual outcome and the
infectious agent, relatively little is known about the species-specific
factors that account for the characteristic severity of each disease.
We previously focused on determining the role of secreted bacterial
toxins in the pathogenesis of endophthalmitis caused by S. aureus and E. faecalis by using well-characterized
laboratory strains in animal models of disease. These studies showed
that cytolytic E. faecalis not only causes more fulminant
disease but also renders the infection unresponsive to
therapeutic intervention (17, 18). The production of
most secreted and cell surface proteins in S. aureus is
coordinately controlled by chromosomal regulatory loci termed accessory
gene regulator (agr) and staphylococcal accessory regulator
(sar) (6, 16, 20). Mutant strains of S. aureus with insertional mutations in the sar and
agr loci are attenuated in virulence in experimental
endophthalmitis compared with parental strains (3, 4). Since
sar and agr affect the expression of 12 or more
unrelated genes (6, 20), the staphylococcal toxin(s) that
contributes most significantly to the severity of disease has not yet
been identified.
To further analyze the bacterial factors that contribute to the
pathogenesis of endophthalmitis, we performed a genomic DNA fingerprint
analysis on 39 S. aureus and 28 E. faecalis
strains isolated from the vitreous or aqueous humor of
endophthalmitis patients treated at multiple clinical centers. The
purpose of this investigation was to assess whether common traits that
may be related to ocular colonization and/or the severity of disease outcome exist among isolates of a particular species.
The S. aureus and E. faecalis isolates analyzed
in this study were collected from patients with endophthalmitis between
1984 and 1995 at Cullen Eye Institute, Houston, Tex. (CE), Dean A. McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City, Okla. (DM), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa. (UP), King Fahd Hospital, Al Hasa, Saudi Arabia (KF) (a kind gift from LouAnn Bartholomew), and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Fla. (BP). S. aureus strains were collected from DM (7 isolates), UP (7 isolates), and BP (25 isolates), while E. faecalis strains
were collected from CE (10 isolates), DM (3 isolates), UP (4 isolates),
KF (2 isolates), and BP (9 isolates). Twenty-nine additional S. aureus clinical isolates of extraocular origin were a kind gift
from Mark Huycke, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Okla. Twenty-one S. aureus keratitis isolates were
obtained from the Alcon Microbiology Culture Collection (Fort Worth,
Tex.).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoretic analysis of endophthalmitis
isolates.
Bacterial genomic DNA was prepared as previously
described (24), except that lysostaphin (50 µg/ml) was
added to the lysis solution for the preparation of S. aureus
chromosomal DNA. Isolates with similar banding patterns and no more
than three band differences were considered clonally related
(32). Isolates with banding patterns similar to clonally
related strains but with no more than four band differences were
considered subtypes of the clonal group. Once isolates were recognized
as having identical or similar banding patterns, a second gel
containing all isolates from the same group was run to verify clonal
relationships. Twenty-one distinct fingerprint patterns were identified
among the S. aureus isolates. Of these, five clonotypes were
present more than once and accounted for 58.9% (23 of 39) of the total
number of isolates. The clonotype represented most frequently was
designated SA1 and accounted for 25.6% (10 of 39) of the isolates
tested (Fig. 1). Isolates in this group
were derived from each of the clinical centers from which S. aureus isolates were obtained (DM, UP, and BP). Clonotypes SA2
(n = 4) and SA3 (n = 2) were also
derived from multiple clinical centers (DM and BP). All isolates
comprising clonotypes SA4 (n = 3) and SA5
(n = 4) were derived from the same clinical center (BP)
(Fig. 1). The remaining 16 isolates (41%) were present only once (data
not shown) and were derived from all three clinical centers. To ensure
that the general clonality observed among the S. aureus
endophthalmitis isolates was not attributable to a
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) genotype (21), strains comprising each of the five S. aureus clonotypes were analyzed for the presence of the
mecA antibiotic resistance determinant (8).
Briefly, bacteria from a 0.5-ml suspension of bacterial cells in
phosphate-buffered saline were lysed by boiling in a sealed tube for 10 min, followed by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 1 min) to
remove cell debris. PCR was performed on cell lysates with previously
published mecA-specific primers (8). Only
clonotype SA4 (three isolates), was found to be mecA positive; all other clonotypes were mecA negative.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PFGE of SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA of
endophthalmitis-derived S. aureus clinical isolates
collected from three clinical centers, BP, DM, and UP. Separate panels
show clonally related isolates. Where present, subtypes are designated
with the suffix 1 or 2. Molecular size standards are the New England
Biolabs lambda ladder.
|
|
In contrast to the S. aureus isolates, substantial clonal
diversity was observed among the E. faecalis isolates. Of
the 28 isolates collected from five clinical centers (CE, DM, UP, KF, and BP), 25 unique genomic DNA fingerprints were identified. Two E. faecalis clonotypes, EF1 (n = 3) and EF2
(n = 2), occurred more than once (Fig.
2). EF1 isolates were derived from either UP (two isolates) or CE (one isolate), while EF2 isolates were derived
from CE and DM. The remaining 23 E. faecalis
endophthalmitis isolates had unique genomic DNA fingerprints.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PFGE of SmaI-digested chromosomal DNA of
selected endophthalmitis-derived E. faecalis clinical
isolates collected from five clinical centers, BP, DM, UP, KF, and CE.
Clonally related strains are identified below the panels. Molecular
size standards are the New England Biolabs lambda ladder.
|
|
Comparison of S. aureus endophthalmitis clonotypes with
S. aureus isolated from various sources.
Since it
was determined that the general clonality observed among the
endophthalmitis-derived S. aureus isolates was not
due to an MRSA genotype, it was considered that the clonotypes
identified might represent species subsets uniquely associated with
ocular infection. To test this hypothesis, we examined chromosomal DNA fingerprints for 21 S. aureus keratitis isolates and 29 S. aureus strains isolated from extraocular infections, such
as soft-tissue, catheter-associated, and surgical-wound infections. The
frequency of occurrence of clonotypes SA1 to SA5 within these
populations of isolates is shown in Table
1. Clonotypes SA1, SA3, SA4, and SA5 were
found among the S. aureus keratitis isolates and accounted for 47.6% (10 of 21) of the total number of isolates analyzed; the
remaining isolates in this group all showed unique genomic DNA
fingerprints. Interestingly, as in the case of
endophthalmitis-derived clonotypes SA1, SA2 and SA3,
keratitis-derived clonotypes SA1, SA3, SA4, and SA5 were collected from
geographically diverse clinical centers (6a). All five
endophthalmitis-derived S. aureus clonotypes occurred at least once among the extraocular-infection isolates. One
new clonotype consisting of three strains (SA6), which was not
represented among either the endophthalmitis- or
keratitis-derived isolates, was identified among the soft-tissue-wound
isolates. The frequency of occurrence of clonotype SA1 among the
extraocular-infection isolates was approximately 2.5-fold lower than
that observed for the endophthalmitis isolates (10% versus
25.6%); however, the difference was not statistically significant
(P = 0.136 [Fisher's exact test]). When analyzed in
combination, the frequency of occurrence of clonotypes SA1 to SA5 was
not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.340 [
2 test]). These results indicate that although
clonotypes SA1 to SA5 are isolated frequently from ocular infections,
these isolates are not unique to this site of infection.
Frequency of cytolysin expression among E. faecalis
endophthalmitis isolates.
The frequency of the
cytolytic genotype among the E. faecalis isolates was
determined by performing PCR on bacterial cell lysates with primers
specific for cylA, the proteolytic activator gene of the
E. faecalis cytolysin operon. The following
oligonucleotide primers were selected from published sequences: 5' AAT
GGA TAA TAT TTC AGA ATT TGA AGT 3' (cylA1) and 5' TTC CCA
CGA AAA TTT TAT AAA CCC 3' (cylA2) (9). Briefly,
a suspension of each isolate was prepared by removing bacterial
colonies from an overnight plate culture with a moistened sterile swab
and resuspending them in 1 ml of sterile 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Bacteria
from 0.5 ml of the suspension were lysed with a Mini-Beadbeater
(Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.) according to the manufacturers
instructions. One hundred fifty microliters of the lysate was removed
to a clean tube and centrifuged (10,000 × g for 1 min) to
remove cell debris. PCR was performed in 10-µl reaction mixtures
containing 1 µl of cell lysate, 1 µl of 3 mM MgSO4, 1 µl of cylA1, 1 µl of cylA2 (10 µM each in
sterile H2O), 1 µl of diluted Taq polymerase
(diluted 1:12.5), 1 µl of 2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 4 µl of H2O in a Rapidcycler PCR machine (Idaho
Technologies, Idaho Falls, Idaho). Following an initial hold step
(94°C for 30 s), the PCR mixtures were cycled 30 times as
follows: denaturation, 94°C for 0 s; annealing, 50°C for
0 s; and elongation, 72° for 35 s. An additional hold step
of 72°C for 2 min was included at the end of the 30 cycles. The
cytolytic phenotype was confirmed by observing zones of hemolysis on
brain heart infusion agar plates containing 5% rabbit blood incubated
for 2 days at 37°C. E. faecalis FA2-2 (pAM714) and
plasmid-free E. faecalis FA2-2 were used as positive and
negative controls, respectively, for the detection of both cytolytic
phenotype and genotype (14). Of the 28 E. faecalis endophthalmitis isolates collected for this
study, 13 (46.4%) possessed the cylA gene, and all
cylA-positive strains were phenotypically positive for
cytolysin expression as indicated by zones of hemolysis on
brain heart infusion agar. This represents an enrichment for the
cytolytic phenotype among endophthalmitis isolates compared
with its occurrence among isolates from the gastrointestinal tracts of
healthy subjects (0 to 17%; P < 0.028 [
2 test]) (12, 15). All isolates comprising
both EF1 and EF2 clonotypes were cytolytic.
Relationship between clonality of endophthalmitis
isolates and final visual outcome.
In the present study, a number
of S. aureus clonotypes which are known to have caused
endophthalmitis in multiple, apparently unrelated cases
were identified. Therefore, it was of interest to determine whether a
correlation between strains of S. aureus and disease outcome
exists. The severity-of-outcome measure used in this study was final
best-corrected visual acuity achieved following treatment for
endophthalmitis and was ascertained following a
retrospective review of patient records. The range of final visual
acuities observed was in agreement with that found in a previous series
for S. aureus endophthalmitis: 20/40 or better, 30.7%; 20/100 or better, 48.7%; 5/200 or better, 64% (7).
The relationship between final best-corrected visual acuity and the clonality of the endophthalmitis-derived isolates was
analyzed by Pearson's chi square (
2) test. Due to the
wide range of visual acuities recorded in patient charts, only two
levels of severity were analyzed: better than 20/200 and 20/200 or
worse. Clonotypes were analyzed either individually (when adequate
numbers of isolates made up the group) or in combination. All isolates
that occurred more than once were designated "clonal" and all those
occurring only once were designated "nonclonal." Table
2 shows the distribution of isolates
comprising each clonotype for each level of severity. Visual acuities
of 20/200 or worse were found in 70%, 50%, 50%, 66%, and 75% of
cases infected with clonotypes SA1, SA2, SA3, SA4, and SA5,
respectively, compared with 31% of the nonclonal isolates (for SA1
versus nonclonal isolates, P was 0.053 [
2
test]). When clonal isolates were combined (SA1 to SA5;
n = 23) and compared for severity of outcome with
isolates occurring only once (nonclonal isolates; n = 16),
it was found that a statistically significant relationship existed
between clonality and visual outcomes of 20/200 or worse
(P = 0.036 [
2 test]). These results
suggest that clonotypes SA1 to SA5 not only possess traits that enhance
ocular colonization, thereby favoring their occurrence at this site,
but also possess traits that contribute to poor visual outcomes
following intraocular infection.
Clinical data were available for 20 of the 28 E. faecalis
isolates. Of these, 15 (75%) had outcomes of 20/200 or worse and 5 (25%) had outcomes better than 20/200, confirming observations of poor
visual outcome associated with most cases of enterococcal endophthalmitis (7). Since most of the E. faecalis endophthalmitis cases were associated with
poor outcomes, no enrichment in the cytolytic phenotype was observed
among the severe outcome group. Specifically, of isolates associated
with severe outcome, eight (53.3%) were cytolytic and seven were
noncytolytic (46.6%). In the better-than-20/200 outcome group, two
were cytolytic and three were noncytolytic (P = 0.605 [
2 test]). For clonotype EF1 (n = 3),
two isolates were associated with visual outcomes of 20/200 or worse.
No clinical information was available for the third EF1 isolate. For
clonotype EF2 (n = 2), one was associated with a visual
outcome of 20/200 or worse and the other with a visual outcome of
better than 20/200. Therefore, no correlation between clonotype
and severity of visual outcome was observed in this study.
Interestingly, two of the E. faecalis isolates (CE200Ef and
CD695Ef) were collected 4 years apart from the same patient presenting
with separate episodes of an infected filtering bleb. The two isolates
were shown not only to be distinct by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
(PFGE) (data not shown) but also to be cytolytic in one case and
noncytolytic in the other. On both occasions, final best-corrected
visual acuities of better than 20/200 were achieved. This finding
suggests that in this particular case, factors unrelated to the
infectious agent may have been important in determining the outcome of
the endophthalmitis.
Two studies have analyzed genomic DNA fingerprint patterns of bacterial
endophthalmitis clinical isolates (2, 31). In these cases, Staphylococcus epidermidis was either the
predominant or the only species examined. In one study, unique
fingerprints were found for all S. epidermidis isolates
(11 isolates) analyzed. The second study compared genomic DNA
fingerprints of 105 S. epidermidis strains isolated
from endophthalmitis patients at several clinical centers
in the United States. With the exception of three strains that were
isolated from two patients each, unique banding patterns were observed
for all isolates from any given clinical center. This contrasts with
the substantial degree of clonality observed in the present study for
S. aureus endophthalmitis isolates. In both
S. aureus and S. epidermidis
endophthalmitis, a likely source for the infecting organism
is the periocular skin, eyelid margins, or nares (22, 31).
With PFGE used to identify clonal relationships between strains, it was
recently shown that nasal colonization patterns by S. aureus and S. epidermidis differ (10,
11). In the case of S. aureus, the same strain
was observed to persistently colonize the host for periods of at least
2 years, while predominant S. epidermidis strains
colonizing the nares were observed to change frequently, with the same
organism persisting for less than 5 months. These data suggest that
S. aureus exists stably at the nasal mucosal surface
under environmental selection pressure that favors the persistence of
particular strains, perhaps due to highly efficient adherence or
clearance avoidance mechanisms. This selection for particular
strain types may be reflected in the incidence of S. aureus isolates that cause endophthalmitis. Since
nasal and ocular mucosal surfaces are continuous through the
nasolacrimal duct, the same colonization mechanisms may be important
for the establishment of ocular infection and nasal colonization.
Recent studies have described cell surface proteins that mediate the binding of S. aureus to nasal mucin (30). It
would be of interest to determine whether clonotypes SA1 to SA5 express
similar mucosal surface binding proteins. Clonotypes SA1 to SA5 were
also observed to occur multiple times among the keratitis-derived
isolates, supporting the suggestion that these clonotypes possess
colonization traits that enhance their abilities to establish ocular
infection. However, the finding that SA1 to SA5 also occur among
nonocular soft-tissue-infection isolates indicates that SA1 to SA5
clonotype strains possess traits favoring colonization of extramucosal
sites as well.
When the relationship between clonality and final visual outcome was
analyzed, S. aureus clonotypes SA1 to SA5 were found to
be significantly associated with final best-corrected visual acuities
of 20/200 or worse. This finding suggests that these strains possess
not only characteristics that enhance ocular colonization but also
traits that lead to loss of organ function. Because toxin production by
S. aureus was previously shown to be related to the
severity of endophthalmitis in animal models (3,
4), current studies are assessing the profiles of toxins
expressed by clonotypes SA1 to SA5 to determine whether a particular
toxin(s) is selectively expressed by these strains.
Substantial clonal diversity was observed among E. faecalis
strains, suggesting that no particular E. faecalis genomic
DNA fingerprint type is more likely than another to cause ocular
infection. However, we observed an enrichment for cytolysin
expression among the E. faecalis isolates over the raw
incidence of its occurrence among isolates derived from the
gastrointestinal tracts of healthy volunteers, as previously
reported (12, 15). This observation is consistent with an
enrichment in the cytolysin genotype among E. faecalis clinical isolates from other anatomical sites (12, 13, 15). Cytolysin is a toxin capable of lysing both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells and is most commonly encoded by highly
transmissible pheromone-responsive plasmids (15). Cytolysin
has been shown previously to be cytotoxic for mouse macrophages and
polymorphonuclear leukocytes (23). The enrichment for the
cytolytic phenotype among the endophthalmitis-derived
E. faecalis isolates may therefore be due to the ability of
cytolytic strains to resist host clearance mechanisms.
S. aureus and E. faecalis are opportunistic
pathogens that reside at preferred commensal colonization sites in or
on the human host without ill effect. When either of these species is
introduced into the eye, as a consequence of a surgical or traumatic
wound, an infection that invariably threatens vision can result. The substantial clonality observed among the
endophthalmitis-derived S. aureus
isolates may relate to the fact that this species colonizes sites in
close proximity to the eye (eyelid margins and nares), while E. faecalis rarely does so. Among the S. aureus
isolates residing close to the eye, certain subsets possessing
colonization traits (e.g., binding proteins and clearance resistance
mechanisms) that position them well for introduction through surgical
or traumatic wounds to the eye may exist. Since E. faecalis
rarely colonizes ocular structures and adjacent surfaces, introduction
of these organisms is more likely the result of seeding from
contaminated material and is therefore not dependent on specialized,
chromosomally encoded colonization mechanisms. However,
possession of variable traits, such as a plasmid-encoded
cytolysin, may provide a colonization advantage for E. faecalis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Gail Cupp of Alcon Laboratories for
providing the keratitis strains analyzed in this study.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants EY10867
(to M.C.B.), EY08289 (to M.S.G.), EY06813 (to M.C.C.), and EY00357 (to J.C.) and by Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), Inc. J.C. is the recipient of a career development award from RPB, Inc.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of
Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 608 S. L. Young Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73104. Phone: (405) 271-1084, Fax: (405) 271-8128. E-mail: mary-booth{at}uokhsc.edu.
Editor: V. A. Fischetti
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Affeldt, J. C.,
H. W. Flynn,
R. K. Forster,
S. Mandelbaum,
J. G. Clarkson, and G. D. Jarus.
1987.
Microbial endophthalmitis resulting from ocular trauma.
Ophthalmology
94:407-413[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bannerman, T. L.,
D. L. Rhoden,
S. K. McAllister,
J. M. Miller, and L. A. Wilson.
1997.
The source of coagulase negative staphylococci in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study.
Arch. Ophthalmol.
115:357-361[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Booth, M. C.,
R. V. Atkuri,
S. K. Nanda,
J. J. Iandolo, and M. S. Gilmore.
1995.
Accessory gene regulator controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in endophthalmitis.
Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
36:1828-1836[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Booth, M. C.,
A. L. Cheung,
K. L. Hatter,
B. D. Jett,
M. C. Callegan, and M. S. Gilmore.
1997.
Staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) contributes to Staphylococcus aureus virulence in endophthalmitis only in conjunction with agr.
Infect. Immun.
65:1550-1556[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Brinton, G. S.,
T. M. Topping,
R. A. Hyndiuk,
T. M. Aaberg,
F. H. Reeser, and G. W. Abrams.
1984.
Posttraumatic endophthalmitis.
Arch. Ophthalmol.
102:547-550[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Cheung, A. L.,
J. M. Koomey,
C. A. Butler,
S. J. Projan, and V. A. Fischetti.
1992.
Regulation of exoprotein expression in Staphylococcus aureus by a locus (sar) distinct from agr.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:6462-6466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6a.
| Cupp, G. (Alcon Microbiology). Personal
communication.
|
| 7.
|
Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group.
1996.
Microbiologic factors and visual outcome in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study.
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
122:830-846[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Geha, D. J.,
J. R. Uhl,
C. A. Gustaferro, and D. H. Persing.
1994.
Multiplex PCR for identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the clinical laboratory.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
32:1768-1772[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gilmore, M. S.,
R. A. Segarra, and M. C. Booth.
1990.
An HlyB-type function is required for expression of the Enterococcus faecalis hemolysin/bacteriocin.
Infect. Immun.
58:3914-3923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Hu, L.,
A. Umeda, and K. Amako.
1995.
Typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis colonizing in human nares by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Microbiol. Immunol.
39:315-319[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hu, L.,
A. Umeda,
S. Kondo, and K. Amako.
1995.
Typing of Staphylococcus aureus colonising human nasal carriers by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
J. Med. Microbiol.
42:127-132[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Huycke, M. M., and M. S. Gilmore.
1995.
Frequency of aggregation substance and cytolysin genes among enterococcal endocarditis isolates.
Plasmid
34:152-156[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Huycke, M. M.,
C. A. Speigel, and M. S. Gilmore.
1991.
Bacteremia caused by hemolytic high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
35:1626-1634[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Ike, Y.,
D. B. Clewell,
R. A. Segarra, and M. S. Gilmore.
1990.
Genetic analysis of the pAD1 hemolysin/bacteriocin determinant in Enterococcus faecalis: Tn917 insertional mutagenesis and cloning.
J. Bacteriol.
172:155-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Ike, Y.,
H. Hashimoto, and D. B. Clewell.
1987.
High incidence of hemolysin production by Enterococcus (Streptococcus) faecalis strains associated with human parenteral infections.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:1524-1528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Janzon, L., and S. Arvidson.
1990.
The role of the -lysin gene (hld) in the regulation of virulence genes by the accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus.
EMBO J.
9:1391-1399[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jett, B. D.,
H. G. Jensen,
R. V. Atkuri, and M. S. Gilmore.
1995.
Evaluation of therapeutic measures for treating endophthalmitis caused by isogenic toxin-producing and toxin-nonproducing Enterococcus faecalis.
Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
36:9-15[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Jett, B. D.,
H. G. Jensen,
R. E. Nordquist, and M. S. Gilmore.
1992.
Contribution of the pAD1-encoded cytolysin to the severity of experimental Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis.
Infect. Immun.
60:2445-2452[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kattan, H. M.,
H. W. Flynn,
S. C. Pflugfelder,
C. Robertson, and R. K. Forster.
1991.
Nosocomial endophthalmitis survey. Current incidence of infection after intraocular surgery.
Ophthalmology
98:227-238[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Kornblum, J.,
B. N. Kreiswirth,
S. J. Projan,
H. Ross, and R. P. Novick.
1990.
Agr: a polycistronic locus regulating exoprotein synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus, p. 373-402. In
R. P. Novick, and S. A. Skurry (ed.), Molecular biology of the staphylococci.
VCH Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 21.
|
Kreiswirth, B.,
J. Kornblum,
R. D. Arbeit,
W. Eisner,
J. N. Maslow,
A. McGeer,
D. E. Low, and R. P. Novick.
1993.
Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.
Science
259:227-230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Locatcher-Khorazo, D.,
N. Sullivan, and E. Gutierrez.
1967.
Staphylococcus aureus isolated from normal and infected eyes.
Arch. Ophthalmol.
77:370-377[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Miyazaki, S.,
A. Ohno,
I. Kobayashi,
T. Uji,
K. Yamaguchi, and S. Goto.
1993.
Cytotoxic effect of hemolytic culture supernatant from Enterococcus faecalis on mouse polymorphonuclear neutrophils and macrophages.
Microbiol. Immunol.
37:265-270[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Murray, B. E.,
K. V. Singh,
J. D. Heath,
B. R. Sharma, and G. M. Weinstock.
1990.
Comparison of genomic DNAs of different enterococcal isolates using restriction fragments with infrequent recognition sites.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:2059-2063[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Olsen, J. C.,
H. W. Flynn,
R. K. Forster, and W. W. Culbertson.
1983.
Results in the treatment of post-operative endophthalmitis.
Ophthalmology
90:692-699[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Philips, W. B., and W. S. Tasman.
1994.
Postoperative endophthalmitis in association with diabetes mellitus.
Ophthalmology
101:508-518[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Puliafito, C. A.,
A. S. Baker,
J. Haaf, and S. Foster.
1982.
Infectious endophthalmitis: review of 36 cases.
Ophthalmology
89:921-929[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Rowsey, J. J.,
D. L. Newsom,
D. J. Sexton, and W. K. Harms.
1982.
Endophthalmitis: current approaches.
Ophthalmology
89:1055-1066[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Shrader, S. K.,
J. D. Band,
C. B. Lauter, and P. Murphy.
1990.
The clinical spectrum of endophthalmitis: incidence, predisposing factors and features influencing outcome.
J. Infect. Dis.
162:115-120[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Shuter, J.,
V. B. Hatcher, and F. D. Lowy.
1996.
Staphylococcus aureus binding to human nasal mucin.
Infect. Immun.
64:310-318[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Speaker, M. G.,
F. A. Milch,
M. K. Shah,
W. Eisner, and B. N. Krieswirth.
1991.
Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis.
Ophthalmology
98:639-649[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Tenover, F. C.,
R. D. Arbeit,
R. V. Goering,
P. A. Mickelsen,
B. E. Murray,
D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan.
1995.
Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:2233-2239[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Weber, D. J.,
K. L. Hoffman,
R. A. Thoft, and A. S. Baker.
1986.
Endophthalmitis following intraocular lens implantation: report of 30 cases and review of the literature.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
8:12-20[Medline].
|
Infect Immun, January 1998, p. 356-360, Vol. 66, No. 1
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
O'Callaghan, R. J., McCormick, C. C., Caballero, A. R., Marquart, M. E., Gatlin, H. P., Fratkin, J. D.
(2007). Age-Related Differences in Rabbits during Experimental Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis. IOVS
48: 5125-5131
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johnson, J. R., Clabots, C., Hirt, H., Waters, C., Dunny, G.
(2004). Enterococcal Aggregation Substance and Binding Substance Are Not Major Contributors to Urinary Tract Colonization by Enterococcus faecalis in a Mouse Model of Ascending Unobstructed Urinary Tract Infection. Infect. Immun.
72: 2445-2448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Callegan, M. C., Engelbert, M., Parke, D. W. II, Jett, B. D., Gilmore, M. S.
(2002). Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Epidemiology, Therapeutics, and Bacterium-Host Interactions. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
15: 111-124
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Booth, M. C., Pence, L. M., Mahasreshti, P., Callegan, M. C., Gilmore, M. S.
(2001). Clonal Associations among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Various Sites of Infection. Infect. Immun.
69: 345-352
[Abstract]
[Full Text]