Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 1998, p. 6045-6048, Vol. 66, No. 12
Department of Molecular Genetics and
Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center,
Worcester, Massachusetts 01655,1 and
Neonatal Research Laboratory,
Received 4 August 1998/Returned for modification 10 September
1998/Accepted 29 September 1998
Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent, binds
glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) such as heparin, heparan sulfate, and
dermatan sulfate. Heparin or heparan sulfate fractions separated by
size or charge were tested for their ability to inhibit attachment of
B. burgdorferi to Vero cells. GAG chains of increasing
length and/or charge showed increasing inhibitory potency, and
detectable heparin inhibition of bacterial binding required a minimum
of 16 residues. The ability of a given heparin fraction to inhibit binding to Vero cells was strongly predictive of its ability to inhibit
hemagglutination, suggesting that hemagglutination reflects the
capacity of B. burgdorferi to bind to GAGs.
Borrelia burgdorferi
sensu lato is the spirochetal agent of Lyme borreliosis, a chronic,
multisystemic illness (12, 24). The bacterium is acquired
from an infected Ixodes tick, and after infecting the skin
at the site of the bite, it can disseminate throughout the mammalian
host. The ability of the spirochete to bind to extracellular matrix or
to the surface of host cells is likely to promote tissue colonization,
and the spirochete has been shown to recognize several classes of host
molecules (3, 4, 7, 8), including the glycosaminoglycan
(GAG) heparin (11, 16).
GAGs consist of long, linear, highly sulfated disaccharide repeats and
are usually found covalently linked to a protein core as a component of
proteoglycans (13, 23). Based on the extent and location of
sulfation and on the composition of the disaccharide unit, GAGs can be
separated into different classes, such as heparin, heparan sulfate,
keratan sulfate, chondroitin-4-sulfate, chondroitin-6-sulfate, or
dermatan sulfate. Even within a given class of GAG there is extensive
heterogeneity due to epimerization of the sugar backbone, differences
in chain length, and variations in the location of N-acetyl,
N-sulfate, and O-sulfate groups. The complexity
and heterogeneity of GAGs complicate the analysis of protein-GAG chain interactions.
B. burgdorferi has been shown to bind to heparin, heparan
sulfate, and dermatan sulfate, as well as to decorin, a dermatan sulfate/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (8, 11, 16).
B. burgdorferi strains that bind heparin have also been
shown to agglutinate rabbit erythrocytes in a heparin-inhibitable
manner, suggesting that the two activities may be linked
(16). It is not clear whether the recognition of different
proteoglycans reflects multiple binding pathways or a single, somewhat
promiscuous pathway. All GAG chains share the feature of high negative
charge, and charge has been demonstrated to be critical for B. burgdorferi binding (11, 16). Nevertheless, charge is
not the sole determinant of binding, because not all GAG chains are
recognized by the spirochete, and the spectrum of GAGs that are
efficiently bound varies among different B. burgdorferi
strains (18). Thus, GAG binding by this bacterium displays
an element of specificity.
Characterization of the structural requirements for heparin recognition
by B. burgdorferi would promote a better understanding of
the nature of this binding specificity as well as the mechanisms of
cell attachment and tissue colonization by this pathogen. In the
present study, we have identified some of the features of GAG chain
structure that are critical for cell attachment by B. burgdorferi. We have further shown that these features are also critical for inhibition of hemagglutination, suggesting that B. burgdorferi GAG binding and hemagglutination are closely linked.
GAG chain charge and chain length are critical for recognition by
B. burgdorferi.
Mammalian cell attachment by strain N40,
clone D10/E9 (an infectious B. burgdorferi sensu stricto
isolate [3]), is inhibited by the presence of
exogenous dextran sulfate, heparin, heparan sulfate, and dermatan
sulfate (16, 17). This inhibition is due to an interaction
between spirochetes and GAG, because treatment of bacteria with GAG
inhibited cell binding even after excess GAG was removed by washing
(data not shown). In contrast, treatment of cell monolayers with GAG
followed by washing resulted in no inhibition of bacterial binding.
Dextran and desulfated heparin failed to inhibit attachment of B. burgdorferi, suggesting that a negative charge is required for
inhibitory activity (11, 16). To further explore the
relationship between charge and binding inhibition, we analyzed several
GAG preparations that differed in charge for the ability to inhibit
B. burgdorferi N40 binding of Vero (monkey kidney) cells, an
interaction that was previously shown to be mediated by proteoglycans
(16). Attachment of radiolabeled B. burgdorferi
N40 to Vero cells was determined in the presence of various
concentrations of GAG, as described elsewhere (16, 17). As
previously shown, completely desulfated, N-acetylated heparin
(Seikagaku, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) had no detectable inhibitory activity,
even when tested at 1 mg/ml (Table 1).
N-desulfated, N-acetylated heparin, which retains O sulfation,
demonstrated weak inhibitory activity.
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Structural Requirements for Glycosaminoglycan
Recognition by the Lyme Disease Spirochete, Borrelia
burgdorferi
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
TABLE 1.
Inhibition of cell attachment and hemagglutination
by GAGs
|
A minimum chain length of 16 residues is required for heparin to inhibit cell binding by B. burgdorferi. The correlation between sugar chain length and inhibition prompted us to test for a minimum size requirement for GAG recognition by B. burgdorferi. Heparin fragments containing 10, 12, 16, 20, or 22 monosaccharide units (gifts of Ulf Lindahl [Department of Medical and Physiological Chemistry, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden] and Jean Choay [Institut Choay, Paris, France] to the late Isidore Danishefsky [15, 19]) were tested for the ability to inhibit bacterial attachment to Vero cells. The 22-mer almost completely blocked attachment, while the 10- and 12-mers had no effect (Fig. 1). The 16-mer (P < 0.05 versus no-inhibitor control) and 20-mer (P < 0.005) inhibited at intermediate levels.
|
Inhibition of cell binding closely correlates with inhibition of
hemagglutination.
It has been postulated that the GAG-binding
activity of B. burgdorferi is reflected by the agglutination
of rabbit erythrocytes, because hemagglutination is inhibited by
heparin and those strains that exhibit low-level hemagglutination
activity also exhibit low-level GAG-binding activity (16). A
further prediction of this hypothesis is that the ability of a given
GAG preparation to inhibit cell attachment should correlate with its
ability to inhibit hemagglutination. Used in these assays was a
detergent extract of B. burgdorferi N40, prepared in bulk
and frozen in aliquots at
70°C, that was found to give a more
predictable hemagglutination titer than intact spirochetes (the
aggregation of which introduced variability in the hemagglutination
titer [data not shown]). To generate this extract, a suspension
containing 1011 B. burgdorferi N40 cells per ml
was lysed by sonication, and the insoluble fraction was extracted in a
solution containing 2% deoxycholate, 20 mM HEPES, 4 mM EDTA, and 0.01 trypsin-inhibitory units of aprotinin (Sigma Chemical Co.) per ml for
40 min at 4°C. The hemagglutination activity of the detergent-soluble
fraction and the effect of each of the GAG preparations on this
activity were determined as described previously (16). When
we tested different classes of GAGs for the ability to inhibit
hemagglutination, keratan sulfate, chondroitin-4-sulfate, and
chondroitin-6-sulfate had no effect whereas heparin and dermatan
sulfate were inhibitory, the former at a much lower concentration than
the latter (Table 1). Completely desulfated, N-acetylated heparin was
devoid of hemagglutination blocking activity, and N-desulfated,
N-acetylated heparin retained weak inhibitory activity. Fractions
containing longer, more highly charged heparin chains were better
inhibitors than fractions containing shorter, less highly charged
fractions (IE and CF series fractions, Table 1). All of these results
paralleled inhibition of Vero cell binding by the same GAG
preparations, and within the CF heparin fractionation series, the
minimum concentration for inhibition of hemagglutination correlated
with the IC50 for cell attachment (Fig.
2).
|
Discussion. We undertook this study to better define the requirements for GAG chain recognition by B. burgdorferi, and we found that both the charge and the chain length of GAGs are critical factors for bacterial binding. The length and/or charge of the GAG chain correlated with inhibition of cell binding by B. burgdorferi, and heparin chains with less than 16 residues lacked detectable inhibitory activity. Given the intimate relationship between the size and total charge of GAGs, it is difficult to assess the relative importance of these two features for bacterial recognition.
The size of the heparin chain has been shown to be important in heparin recognition by other pathogenic microorganisms, such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Plasmodium falciparum (1, 2), and by many heparin-binding proteins as well (14). The correlation between GAG length and inhibitory activity for B. burgdorferi binding could indicate that the bacterial receptor for GAGs recognizes longer GAGs better. Alternatively, the effective inhibition of bacterial binding to mammalian cells may involve steric hindrance or electrostatic repulsion between the bacterium and the host cell, features that are likely to be provided better by longer heparin fragments. This issue could be addressed by direct measurement of heparin-spirochete interaction, but this would require either labeling of each GAG preparation or the use of significantly larger quantities of GAG (11, 16). The results presented here suggest that the B. burgdorferi heparin-binding component(s) is also responsible for this bacterium's hemagglutinating activity. Those GAG preparations that were potent inhibitors of cell binding were also potent inhibitors of hemagglutination, and those preparations that did not inhibit binding did not inhibit hemagglutination. A few GAG preparations, such as heparan sulfate HS-A and heparin fractions IE-1 and IE-2, inhibited cell binding but did not inhibit hemagglutination, suggesting that inhibition of cell attachment is a more sensitive method for detecting the GAG-binding activity of B. burgdorferi. B. burgdorferi has been demonstrated to bind to both heparin, heparan sulfate, and dermatan sulfate GAGs (11, 16, 17) as well as to specific proteoglycans, such as decorin (8). It is not known whether binding to multiple GAGs or proteoglycans reflects a single or multiple mechanisms of cell attachment. Two decorin-binding proteins have been identified (6, 9, 10), but binding of B. burgdorferi to decorin was not inhibited by heparin, suggesting that binding of heparin and binding of decorin by this bacterium are distinct activities (8). The evidence presented here suggesting that GAG binding by B. burgdorferi is strongly linked to hemagglutination provides a strategy for evaluating candidate GAG-binding proteins and for the purification and identification of the B. burgdorferi GAG-binding hemagglutinin(s).| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Ira Schwartz for facilitating the initiation of this study, Ulf Lindahl and the late Jean Choay for their gifts of defined heparin fragments to the late Isidore Danishefsky, and Jenifer Coburn and Trudy Morrison for helpful discussion and careful review of the manuscript.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01-AI 37601 to J.M.L. and by New York State Affiliate American Heart Association grant-in-aid award 91-011G to L.R. B.L. was supported in part by NIH grant HL-16955 to Isidore Danishefsky. J.M.L. is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655. Phone: (508) 856-4059. Fax: (508) 856-5920. E-mail: john.leong{at}banyan.ummed.edu.
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Isidore Danishefsky.
Present address: Department of Medicine, New York Medical College,
Valhalla, NY 10595.
Editor: P. E. Orndorff
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Chen, J. C.,
J. P. Zhang, and R. S. Stephens.
1996.
Structural requirements of heparin binding to Chlamydia trachomatis.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:11134-11140 |
| 2. | Clark, D. L., S. Su, and E. A. Davidson. 1997. Saccharide anions as inhibitors of the malaria parasite. Glycoconj. J. 14:473-479[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Coburn, J.,
J. Leong, and J. Erban.
1993.
Integrin IIb 3 mediates binding of the Lyme disease agent, Borrelia burgdorferi, to human platelets.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7058-7063.
|
| 4. |
Coburn, J.,
L. Magoun,
S. C. Bodary, and J. M. Leong.
1998.
Integrins v 3 and 5 1 mediate attachment of Lyme disease spirochetes to human cells.
Infect. Immun.
66:1946-1952 |
| 5. |
Coburn, J.,
S. W. Barthold, and J. M. Leong.
1994.
Diverse Lyme disease spirochetes bind integrin IIb 3 on human platelets.
Infect. Immun.
62:5559-5567 |
| 6. |
Feng, S.,
E. Hodzic,
B. Stevenson, and S. W. Barthold.
1998.
Humoral immunity to Borrelia burgdorferi N40 decorin binding proteins during infection of laboratory mice.
Infect. Immun.
66:2827-2835 |
| 7. |
Garcia Monco, J. C.,
B. Fernandez Villar,
R. C. Rogers,
A. Szczepanski,
C. M. Wheeler, and J. L. Benach.
1992.
Borrelia burgdorferi and other related spirochetes bind to galactocerebroside.
Neurology
42:1341-1348 |
| 8. | Guo, B. P., S. J. Norris, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Höök. 1995. Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin. Infect. Immun. 63:3467-3472[Abstract]. |
| 9. |
Hagman, K. E.,
P. Lahdenne,
T. G. Popova,
S. F. Porcella,
D. R. Akins,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1998.
Decorin-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi is encoded within a two-gene operon and is protective in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2674-2683 |
| 10. |
Hanson, M. S.,
D. R. Cassatt,
B. P. Guo,
N. K. Patel,
M. P. McCarthy,
D. W. Dorward, and M. Höök.
1998.
Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection.
Infect. Immun.
66:2143-2153 |
| 11. | Isaacs, R. 1994. Borrelia burgdorferi bind to epithelial cell proteoglycan. J. Clin. Investig. 93:809-819. |
| 12. | Kalish, R. A. 1993. Lyme disease. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 19:399-426[Medline]. |
| 13. | Kjellen, L., and U. Lindahl. 1991. Proteoglycans: structures and interactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60:443-475[Medline]. |
| 14. | Klebe, R. J., and P. J. Mock. 1982. Effect of glycosaminoglycans on fibronectin-mediated cell attachment. J. Cell. Physiol. 112:5-9[Medline]. |
| 15. | Lahiri, B., P. S. Lai, M. Pousada, D. Stanton, and I. Danishefsky. 1992. Depolymerization of heparin by complexed ferrous ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 293:54-60[Medline]. |
| 16. | Leong, J. M., P. E. Morrissey, E. Ortega-Barria, M. E. A. Pereira, and J. Coburn. 1995. Hemagglutination and proteoglycan binding by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63:874-883[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Leong, J. M.,
H. Wang,
L. Magoun,
J. A. Field,
P. E. Morrissey,
D. Robbins,
J. B. Tatro,
J. Coburn, and N. Parveen.
1998.
Different classes of proteoglycans contribute to the attachment of Borrelia burgdorferi to cultured endothelial and brain cells.
Infect. Immun.
66:994-999 |
| 18. | Parveen, N., D. Robbins, and J. M. Leong. Strain-to-strain variation in glycosaminoglycan binding and cell type-specific binding among Lyme disease spirochetes. Submitted for publication. |
| 19. |
Pejler, G.,
U. Lindahl,
O. Larm,
E. Scholander,
E. Sandgren, and A. Lundblad.
1988.
Monoclonal antibodies specific for oligosaccharides prepared by partial nitrous acid deamination of heparin.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:5197-5201 |
| 20. | Radoff, S., and I. Danishefsky. 1981. Isolation and properties of high molecular weight heparin. Thromb. Res. 22:353-365[Medline]. |
| 21. | Reantragoon, S., L. M. Arrigo, H. S. Dweck, and L. Rosenfeld. 1996. Suppression of endothelin-1 production in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells by heparin fractions separated by strong anion exchange chromatography. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 327:234-238[Medline]. |
| 22. | Rice, K. G., M. K. Rottink, and R. J. Lindhardt. 1987. Fractionation of heparin oligosaccharides by gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Biochem. J. 244:512-522. |
| 23. | Silbert, J. E., M. Bernfield, and R. Kokenyesi. 1997. Proteoglycans: a special class of glycoproteins, p. 1-31. In J. Montreuil, J. F. G. Vliegenthart, and J. Schachter (ed.), Glycoproteins II. Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 24. | Steere, A. C. 1989. Lyme disease. New Engl. J. Med. 321:586-596[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»