Previous Article | Next Article 
Infect Immun, May 1998, p. 1968-1972, Vol. 66, No. 5
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Validation of a Volunteer Model of Cholera with
Frozen Bacteria as the Challenge
David A.
Sack,1,*
Carol O.
Tacket,2
Mitchell B.
Cohen,3
R. Bradley
Sack,1
Genevieve A.
Losonsky,2
Janet
Shimko,1
James P.
Nataro,2
Robert
Edelman,2
Myron M.
Levine,2
Ralph A.
Giannella,3
Gilbert
Schiff,3 and
Dennis
Lang4
The Vaccine Testing Unit, Department of
International Health, Johns Hopkins University,1
and
The Center for Vaccine Development, University of
Maryland School of Medicine,2 Baltimore, and
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
Bethesda,4 Maryland, and
Children's
Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
Ohio3
Received 15 September 1997/Returned for modification 12 December
1997/Accepted 2 February 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
To evaluate a standardized inoculum of Vibrio cholerae
for volunteer challenge studies, 40 healthy adult volunteers were
challenged at three different institutions with a standard inoculum
prepared directly from vials of frozen, virulent, El Tor Inaba V. cholerae N16961, with no further incubation. Groups of 5 volunteers, with each group including 2 volunteers with blood group O,
were given a dose of 105 CFU, and 34 of the 40 volunteers developed diarrhea (mean incubation time, 28 h). Transient fevers occurred in 15 (37.5%) of the volunteers. V. cholerae was excreted by 36 of 40 volunteers. Five
additional volunteers received 104 CFU, and four developed
diarrhea but with a lower average purging rate than required for the
model. Of the 40 volunteers, 37 developed rises in their vibriocidal
and antitoxin titers similar to those in previous groups challenged
with freshly harvested bacteria. We conclude that challenge
with frozen bacteria results in a reproducible illness similar to that
induced by freshly harvested bacteria. Use of this model should
minimize differences in attack rates or severity when groups are
challenged at different times and in different institutions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cholera continues to be a major
public health problem in nearly all developing countries, now including
the Western hemisphere (17). It became newsworthy recently
because of its introduction into Latin America in 1991 and because of
the epidemic among refugees in Zaire, which led to an estimated 50,000 deaths during this epidemic alone (7). Cholera continues in
less dramatic fashion as an endemic disease in over 100 countries
(6). An improved vaccine(s) for cholera could provide an
important public health tool with which to control the disease
(4). The development of such a vaccine has been aided
greatly by the use of volunteer studies in which volunteers are
immunized with an experimental vaccine and then experimentally
challenged with a virulent strain while hospitalized in a facility
experienced in the management of such volunteers. By comparing the
rates and severity of illness in immunized and nonimmunized volunteers,
the efficacy of the vaccine against this standard challenge is
determined (2, 9, 10, 14-16). Experience with this model
has indicated that vaccines showing efficacy in volunteers have also
demonstrated efficacy when tested in field trials (2).
While the volunteer model is valid and useful, there are constraints
which have limited its utility. The major constraint relates to the
need for each group of volunteers to receive the same virulent
challenge, in terms of both the numbers of bacteria and the virulence
of the bacterial preparation. Currently, the bacterial challenge is
prepared by a standard operating procedure so that a consistent number
of freshly grown bacteria is given to the volunteers. However, only a
few vaccine-testing centers have the resources to develop this
challenge procedure. In addition, minor differences in growth
conditions (e.g., media, time of incubation, and temperature) could
affect the virulence of the challenge bacteria. As the need grows for
additional testing sites where such volunteer studies can be performed,
there is also a need to ensure that the challenge given to volunteers
is uniform among different volunteer units and among groups of
volunteers within the same unit challenged at different times.
The National Institutes of Health therefore undertook to prepare a
batch of frozen Vibrio cholerae (El Tor Inaba strain N16961) with a large number of aliquots so that identical vials from the lot
could be used for volunteer challenge studies. It was hypothesized that
the use of this frozen inoculum would result in consistent attack
rates, and consistent severity of illnesses among different groups of
volunteers and at different clinical sites. Furthermore, it was
hypothesized that the illness seen when frozen inocula were used would
be similar to illnesses observed when freshly harvested bacteria were
used, including a geometric mean stool output of
3 liters.
Since the blood group of the volunteer is also an important determinant
of the severity of cholera (1, 3, 8), the model also
included two persons with blood group O among each group of five
volunteers to standardize this potentially confounding variable.
This report summarizes the clinical, microbiological, and serological
findings when the frozen inoculum was given to nine groups of
volunteers at three institutions. Past studies have used a dose of
106 CFU per dose of freshly harvested organisms; hence, the
plan was to begin with a lower dose (105 CFU), expecting to
increase in 1-log increments up to 106 or even
107 CFU per dose if needed to induce a consistent illness.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Preparation and validation of the inoculum.
The challenge
lot, containing El Tor strain N16961, was prepared as a 5-liter
fermentor batch, and over 2,300 vials with 2 ml per vial were filled,
labeled, and frozen at
70°C by the Salk Institute, West Point, Pa.
This strain has been used frequently as a challenge strain by the
University of Maryland Center for Vaccine Development (CVD)
(10). Sample vials were tested to validate the purity and
stability of the inoculum. The frozen preparation was agglutinated with
Vibrio O1 ("poly") antiserum (Difco Laboratories) and
with Inaba antiserum but not with Ogawa antiserum or saline. These
results were identical to those exhibited by the positive control
strain obtained from the culture collection at the CVD. Both the frozen
and control samples "keyed" to V. cholerae when the
20E strip (API Analytabs, Plainview, N.Y.) was used. A total of 90 colonies from three frozen vials were obtained from Luria agar plates
and were hybridized with a probe to detect cholera toxin-encoding genes
(10). All 90 colonies hybridized with the cholera toxin
probe. The concentration of organisms (CFU/per milliliter on Luria
agar) has been consistently 5 × 109 since the
preparation of the challenge lot in August 1995 until the present
(February 1997). The vials are stored at a National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases repository and were shipped on dry ice
to the participating study sites. The vials were kept frozen at
70°C until used at the respective sites, and the contents were
diluted in phosphate-buffered saline immediately before use. The
stability of the inocula was further documented by obtaining
quantitative counts with serial dilutions in the laboratory of the
volunteer unit. After incubation of the inoculum in 1.33% sodium
bicarbonate buffer for 1 h, there was no change in the numbers of
bacteria recovered.
Study plan.
The goal of the study was to determine a dose of
bacteria which would consistently induce diarrhea in
80% of
volunteers. Additionally, it was important that many of the illnesses
should be moderate or severe (i.e., that the geometric mean of the
total diarrhea was at least 3 liters). For safety reasons, it was
planned to start with a dose of 105 bacteria (1 log lower
than has been used with freshly grown bacteria) and to increase the
inoculum strength if the attack rate or the severity was too low. Since
the dose of 105 did, in fact, induce illnesses according to
the criteria established, the dose was not increased, but one group was
given a lower dose (104 CFU) to determine if an even lower
dose would be sufficient to be useful in the model.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and experimentation
followed the guidelines of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services and of the respective institutions (Johns Hopkins University,
the University of Maryland, and Children's Hospital Medical Center).
Volunteer studies.
Groups of volunteers (n = 5 per group) were recruited from the community in Baltimore and
Cincinnati for our studies by advertisements in local newspapers.
Healthy, eligible, and willing volunteers between 18 and 40 years of
age were trained, passed a written examination to document their
knowledge of cholera and the procedures of the study, signed an
informed-consent form, and underwent a series of clinical and
laboratory examinations to rule out occult illness or pregnancy. The
screening examinations included a complete blood count with
differential, chemistry panel, urinalysis, hepatitis B antigen,
hepatitis C antibody, human immunodeficiency virus antibody, blood
type, and urine human chorionic gonadotropin (for females) within 2 days of the study, and an electrocardiogram. Potential volunteers were
excluded if any of the following applied: chronic illness,
immunosuppressive condition, human immunodeficiency virus antibody
positive, hepatitis B surface antigen positive, hepatitis C antibody
positive, travel to an area of endemic cholera infection within 5 years, receipt of a cholera vaccine within 5 years, previous
participation in a research study with cholera or enterotoxigenic
Escherichia coli, pregnancy (urine human chorionic gonadotropin), antibiotic administration within 7 days of the challenge, regular use of laxatives, abnormal stool pattern,
significant abnormality in screening laboratory hematology and
chemistry tests, known allergy to tetracycline, or a significant
abnormality on EKG. Within each group of five volunteers, two had blood
group O.
Volunteers were admitted to the study unit 1 or 2 days before
challenge. On the day of challenge (day 0), they ate breakfast at about
7 a.m., and then fasted until the challenge, which occurred at
about 10 a.m. The challenge inoculum was made by thawing a single
vial of frozen preparation and serially diluting it in phosphate-buffered saline by a standard operating procedure. The inocula were placed into separate plastic bottles containing 30 ml of
the bicarbonate solution. During the challenge procedure, the
volunteers drank 120 ml of buffer solution and 1 min later drank the
bacterial challenge dissolved in the same buffer solution. The total
amount of buffer was 2 g of sodium bicarbonate in 150 ml of water.
After the challenge, they fasted for 90 min and then were allowed to
eat food ad libitum.
Clinical management.
The volunteers were monitored for the
occurrence of symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea and were
visited at least twice daily to ascertain and manage any medical
problems. Fluid intake and output was continuously monitored, with
subtotals being obtained every 8 h. All stools were passed into a
plastic container for weighing, inspecting, sampling, and disinfection
(with sodium hypochlorite [Clorox]). The stools were graded on a 1 to
5 scale (1, firm; 2, soft; 3, runny, takes the shape of the container; 4, brown liquid; 5, rice water). The hydration of volunteers who developed diarrhea was maintained with either a glucose- or rice-based oral rehydration solution (CeraLyte, Jessup, Maryland) to match diarrhea output losses with oral rehydration solution on a 1.5:1.0 basis (one-and-a-half times as much oral rehydration solution as
diarrheal stool output). When clinically indicated, intravenous Ringer's lactate was given, matching diarrhea stool volumes with an
equivalent volume of rehydration fluid.
Tetracycline administration (500 mg orally every 6 h for 5 days)
was started at the time the volunteers met the definition
of severe
cholera (>5 kg of diarrhea stool) or on day 4 at 12
noon if they had
not already received it. They were discharged
when they were
asymptomatic, had negative stool cultures for
V. cholerae on two samples, and had received a complete course of
tetracycline.
Definitions.
A patient with cholera was defined as a
volunteer who passed at least two diarrheal stools (grade 3, 4, or 5)
totaling at least 200 g or who passed at least one diarrheal stool
totaling 300 g within a 48-h period, associated with a stool
culture positive for V. cholerae. A patient with a
moderate case was one who passed 3 to 5 kg of diarrheal stool during
the study, and one with a severe case was one who passed at least 5 kg
during the study.
Laboratory procedures.
The clinical screening laboratory
tests were carried out in the clinical laboratories of the
participating hospitals. The microbiology tests were carried out in the
research laboratories of the respective investigators.
Stool cultures were obtained daily (up to two specimens per day) after
the challenge to determine the duration of excretion
of virulent
V. cholerae and to measure the number of
V. cholerae being excreted. A rectal swab specimen was obtained if no
stool
was passed. The fecal specimens were inoculated into
alkaline
peptone water for qualitative culture and diluted 1:10
in PBS
for quantitative culture. The alkaline peptone water
specimen
was inoculated onto a thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose
(TCBS)
plate after a 6-h incubation at 37°C. For quantitative
cultures,
100 µl of stool diluted serially (10-fold dilutions) was
spread
on TCBS agar and incubated at 35°C and the numbers of colonies
of
V. cholerae were counted after an 18-h incubation.
Suspected
colonies were confirmed to be
V. cholerae on
the basis of results
with oxidase reagent and agglutination with O1
antiserum.
Blood samples (20 ml for serological testing and 35 ml for
antibody-secreting cells assays) were obtained four times: before
admission and on days 7, 10, and 14. Aliquots of serum were stored
at

20°C until assayed for cholera serology. To compare the serological
results at two laboratories, aliquots from the first three groups
from
both the Johns Hopkins University Vaccine Testing Unit (JHU-VTU)
and
the CVD (120 serum samples) were sent to the National Institutes
of
Health, where the sera were coded and sent back to the laboratories
of
the JHU-VTU and the CVD, where they were tested for vibriocidal
and
antitoxin antibodies. These coded sera were arranged so that
the four
specimens from each volunteer were tested in adjacent
wells, but the
order of the sera was randomized within each group
of four samples.
Methods used at these laboratories have been described previously
(
5,
11,
13). The methods used for vibriocidal antibody
assays were similar between the two institutions, and for both
the end
point was defined as the highest dilution in which there
is no visible
growth. The antitoxin assay, however, is performed
differently; the
JHU-VTU laboratory performs the assay with serial
fivefold dilutions of
sera to reach an end point (defined as the
extrapolated titer yielding
an optical density [OD] of 0.4), while
the CVD laboratory determines
the OD with a single 1:50 dilution
of serum. A positive response is
defined as an increase of 0.2
OD unit. Thus, the JHU-VTU laboratory
result is an end point titer
whereas the CVD result is read as positive
or negative.
At the same time as the serum collections, whole blood was also
collected to determine the number of antibody-secreting cells
(ASC) to
cholera toxin and
V. cholerae lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
This assay was carried out at the CVD (
12). The results were
expressed as the number of specific antibody-secreting
cells/10
6 peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Comparison to past challenge studies.
Records from past
studies conducted at the CVD with freshly harvested V. cholerae N16961 were reviewed to compare the illnesses which
occurred in the past studies with those seen in the present study,
which used the same strain but with a frozen inoculum.
 |
RESULTS |
Challenge dose of 105 CFU.
Eight groups of
volunteers (n = 5 per group) received a challenge dose
of 105 CFU, including three groups at JHU-VTU, three at
CVD, and two at Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati.
The clinical illnesses observed among all groups of volunteers were, in
general, typical of cholera, as shown in Tables
1 and
2.
Of the 40 volunteers, 34 (85%) developed diarrhea; the
attack rates in
the groups varied from 60 to 100%. Only one group
among the eight had
fewer than four illnesses. Of these illnesses,
16 (47%) were mild, 8 (24%) were moderate, and 10 (29%) were severe.
As expected, the most
prominent symptom of the illnesses was watery
diarrhea, typical of
cholera. Ten (25%) of the volunteers also
vomited. The interval
between ingesting the inoculum and the onset
of symptoms averaged
28.4 h (standard deviation SD = 8.7 h; range
= 11 to 48 h), and most symptoms started the day after challenge.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Clinical and bacteriological responses in groups of
volunteers challenged with 105 V. cholerae
El Tor N16961 frozen inoculum preparation
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Comparison of the clinical and bacteriological responses
in volunteers challenged with V. cholerae El Tor
N16961 frozen inoculum preparation by blood group
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Serological responses among 30 volunteers challenged with
frozen V. cholerae N16961 as measured in
two laboratories
|
|
As expected, volunteers with blood group O tended to have more severe
diarrhea than others, although this was of borderline
statistical
significance (Table
2). Of 16 volunteers with blood
group O, 7 had
severe diarrhea, but only 3 of 24 with other blood
groups had severe
diarrhea (
P = 0.058, Fisher's exact test). If
those
having either moderate or severe diarrhea are grouped, however,
there
was no difference by blood group (9 of 16 for blood group
O versus 9 of
24 for other groups). The geometric means of the
diarrheal stool
volumes were 4,068 g (confidence interval = 2,541
to 6,512 g) for
blood group O and 2,977 g (C.I. = 2,019 to 4,389
g) for other groups
(not statistically significant).
Fever occurred more often than expected. Fevers (>100.5°F)
occurred the day after challenge and lasted less than 24 h
in 15
(37.5%) of the 40 volunteers. The fevers averaged 101.4°F, but
one volunteer's temperature reached 103.5°F. The volunteers with
fever complained of malaise, but there were no localizing complaints
associated with the fever. Blood cultures from the first three
febrile
volunteers were sterile.
Stool cultures from all but four volunteers who were challenged were
positive (Table
1). None of these four had diarrhea.
Two other
asymptomatic volunteers did have positive stool cultures.
All persons
with diarrhea had a positive stool culture for
V. cholerae, and the concentration of
V. cholerae was
generally from
10
6 to 10
9 CFU per g of feces
(geometric mean, 3.9 × 10
7 CFU/g).
Challenge dose of 104 CFU.
At JHU-VTU, one group
(n = 5) was challenged with 104 CFU to
determine if this lower dose would be adequate. Four of five volunteers did develop diarrhea; however, the geometric mean stool output was
1,608 g, which is less than required for the model. Three of these
volunteers also had transient fever (maximum temperature = 101.7°F), including one who did not have diarrhea. Stool cultures from each volunteer were positive.
Serological test results.
A total of 37 (92.5%) of 40 volunteers who received 105 CFU and 5 of 5 who received
104 CFU had significant rises in their vibriocidal and
antitoxin titers when prechallenge sera were compared with sera
collected on days 10 and 14 after challenge. The results of the serum
antibody assays on samples from the first 30 volunteers which were
assayed at both the JHU-VTU and the CVD under code are shown in Table 3. The volunteers included five groups
challenged with 105 CFU (n = 25) and one
group challenged with 104 CFU (n = 5). Of
40 volunteers, 37 (92.5%) developed a
fourfold vibriocidal response
and a
twofold immunoglobulin G (IgG) (and IgA at the JHU-VTU)
antitoxin response when the day 10 and day 14 sera were compared to the
prechallenge sera. The three volunteers who failed to develop
serological responses were ones who also had no diarrheal symptoms, but
three other asymptomatic volunteers did develop vibriocidal and
antitoxin responses. All symptomatic volunteers developed significant
vibriocidal and IgG (and IgA at the JHU-VTU) antitoxin responses. Peak
vibriocidal titers were seen on day 10, while peak antitoxin titers
were seen on day 14 (Table 3).
When blinded samples were used, there was 100% agreement between the
two laboratories with regard to which individuals developed
significant
vibriocidal and IgG antitoxin responses. The geometric
mean titers
(GMTs) of the vibriocidal titers tended to be about
four to five times
higher at the CVD than at the JHU-VTU. The
correlation coefficient
between the logs of the absolute titers
was 0.84. Despite some
differences in the titers of individual
sera, the magnitude of the
rises in the geometric mean titers
was similar between the two
laboratories (about a 50-fold increase
between prechallenge and day 10 sera) and the correlation between
the log of the rises was 0.75. Differences in methods for IgG
antitoxin responses preclude direct
comparison of the magnitude
of the IgG antitoxin responses. All persons
who developed a rise
in IgG antitoxin titer also developed a
significant rise in IgA
antitoxin titer as determined at the JHU-VTU
laboratory.
Immune responses, as determined by increases in the numbers of ASCs in
peripheral blood occurred in most of the volunteers.
The mean numbers
of ASCs to cholera toxin and Inaba LPS are shown
in Table
4. IgA and
IgG ASC antitoxin responses predominated,
with the responses being
somewhat higher on day 7 than day 10.
The same three volunteers who had
no vibriocidal or antitoxin
response also failed to develop a
detectable IgA or IgG antitoxin
ASC response and remained asymptomatic.
Anti-Inaba LPS ASC responses
were less frequently detected than were
antitoxin responses. With
an arbitrary cutoff of 5 ASCs per
10
6 peripheral blood mononuclear cells 15 volunteers
developed rises
in anti-LPS IgA ASCs and only 4 developed IgG ASC
responses. By
contrast, 26 of 29 developed IgM anti-LPS ASC
responses.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study, involving eight similar groups from three
vaccine-testing centers, has demonstrated that ingestion of an inoculum prepared directly from a frozen vial of V. cholerae
N16961, with no further incubation, resulted in a consistent, acute,
watery diarrheal illness typical of cholera. The incubation period and time course were similar to those in previous studies with freshly harvested N16961. A comparison of the results obtained in the present
study (with frozen inoculum) with historical data from previous
challenge studies performed at the CVD (with freshly harvested
organisms) is shown in Table 5.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 5.
Clinical illnesses observed in past challenge studies of
naive volunteers with freshly harvested V. cholerae N16961
|
|
The only unusual symptom with the model used in the present study was
the self-limited fever beginning the day after challenge in more than
50% of the volunteers. Fevers have been seen in volunteers challenged
with this strain previously, but the proportion of volunteers with
fever in these groups was higher than observed previously. The cause of
the fever is not known; however, it seems most likely that the fever is
related directly to infection with the Vibrio strain itself
rather than to an adventitious agent, since the inoculum was screened
carefully for contaminants. A pyrogenic contaminant or fever due to
endotoxin from killed Vibrio organisms is most unlikely
since the inoculum itself was diluted by a factor of 50,000 before
being given to the volunteers. Fevers also occurred in the group
receiving a dose of 104 CFU (dilution factor of 500,000),
suggesting that the causative agent of the fever is a viable organism.
Since the challenge organism started from a frozen state, it seemed
possible that either the incubation period or the immune response would
be delayed relative to those seen for challenge with freshly harvested
organisms. In fact, there was no difference in the time course of
either of these events. Technically, the use of the frozen challenge is
easier and results in a consistent inoculum. Compared to a 2-days
preparation when fresh organisms are used, the frozen inoculum can now
be prepared, by a standard procedure, in about 30 min. More
importantly, the inoculum given to volunteers is uniform and so the
identical inoculum can be given at different times and at different
centers.
Since the vibriocidal and antitoxin assays are key indicators of the
immune response, it seemed important to compare the results in at least
two laboratories. The titers, as reflected by the GMTs were
approximately four to five times higher when measured at CVD than when
measured at JHU-VTU, but there was good correlation between the rises
in titer between the two laboratories and there was 100% agreement in
determining which volunteers had a significant vibriocidal response.
The IgG responses to antitoxin also agreed between the two
laboratories, but the different methods used prohibited a comparison of
the magnitude of the responses.
While this study has demonstrated that challenge with a frozen inoculum
results in a consistent cholera illness, further studies are needed to
investigate whether immunized volunteers will be protected against this
standard challenge. If these studies are successful, this will greatly
assist in the efficient evaluation of candidate cholera vaccines in the
future. The results of the present study may also be relevant for other
volunteer studies involving oral challenge with live bacteria, e.g.,
E. coli or shigellae.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the following NIH grants and
contracts: NIAID contract N01-AI 45252; MO1-RR08084, General Clinical Research Centers Program; NCRR-NIH (Children's Hospital, Cincinnati); RR-00035 to the General Clinical Research Center (The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland); and NIAID contract N01-AI 45251 (University of Maryland).
We appreciate the technical assistance of Joe Gomes, Yulvonnda Brown,
Wendy Luther, Yu Lim, Lou Brunner, Jennifer Hawkins, and Jim Sherwood.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Johns Hopkins
University Vaccine Testing Unit, 550 N. Broadway, Suite 1001, Baltimore, MD 21205. Phone: (410) 955-0053. Fax: (410) 614-9483. E-mail: dsack{at}jhsph.edu.
Editor: R. N. Moore
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barua, D., and A. S. Paguio.
1977.
ABO blood groups and cholera.
Ann. Hum. Biol.
4:489-492[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Black, R. E.,
M. M. Levine,
M. L. Clements,
C. R. Young,
A. M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren.
1987.
Protective efficacy in humans of killed whole-vibrio oral cholera vaccine with and without the B subunit of cholera toxin.
Infect. Immun.
55:1116-1120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Clemens, J. D.,
D. A. Sack,
J. R. Harris,
J. Chakraborty,
M. R. Khan,
S. Huda,
F. Ahmed,
J. Gomes,
M. R. Rao, and A. M. Svennerholm.
1989.
ABO blood groups and cholera: new observations on specificity of risk and modification of vaccine efficacy.
J. Infect. Dis.
159:770-773[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Clemens, J. D.,
D. A. Sack,
J. R. Harris,
J. Chakraborty,
M. R. Khan,
B. F. Stanton,
M. Ali,
F. Ahmed,
M. Yunus, and B. A. Kay.
1988.
Impact of B subunit killed whole-cell and killed whole-cell-only oral vaccines against cholera upon treated diarrhoeal illness and mortality in an area endemic for cholera.
Lancet
i:1375-1379.
|
| 5.
|
Clements, M. L.,
M. M. Levine,
C. R. Young,
R. E. Black,
Y. L. Lim,
R. M. Robins-Browne, and J. P. Craig.
1982.
Magnitude, kinetics, and duration of vibriocidal antibody responses in North Americans after ingestion of Vibrio cholerae.
J. Infect. Dis.
145:465-473[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Glass, R. I.,
S. Becker,
M. I. Huq,
B. J. Stoll,
M. U. Khan,
M. H. Merson,
J. V. Lee, and R. E. Black.
1982.
Endemic cholera in rural Bangladesh, 1966-1980.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
116:959-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Goma Epidemiology Group.
1995.
Public health impact of Rwandan refugee crisis: what happened in Goma, Zaire, in July, 1994?
Lancet
345:339-344[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Lagos, R.,
A. Avendano,
V. Prado,
I. Horwitz,
S. Wasserman,
G. Losonsky,
S. J. Cryz, Jr.,
J. B. Kaper, and M. M. Levine.
1995.
Attenuated live cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR elicits significantly higher serum vibriocidal antibody titers in persons of blood group O.
Infect. Immun.
63:707-709[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Levine, M. M., and J. B. Kaper.
1993.
Live oral vaccines against cholera: an update.
Vaccine
11:207-212[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Levine, M. M.,
J. B. Kaper,
D. A. Herrington,
J. M. Ketley,
G. Losonsky,
C. O. Tacket,
B. Tall, and S. J. Cryz, Jr.
1988.
Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of recombinant live oral cholera vaccines, CVD 103 and CVD 103-HgR.
Lancet
ii:467-470.
|
| 11.
|
Levine, M. M.,
C. R. Young,
R. E. Black,
Y. Takeda, and R. A. Finkelstein.
1985.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure antibodies to purified heat-labile enterotoxins from human and porcine strains of Escherichia coli and to cholera toxin: application in serodiagnosis and seroepidemiology.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
21:174-179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Losonsky, G. A.,
J. Yunyongying,
V. Lim,
M. Reymann,
Y. L. Lim,
S. S. X. Wasserman, and M. M. Levine.
1996.
Factors influencing secondary vibriocidal immune responses: relevance for understanding immunity to cholera.
Infect. Immun.
64:10-15[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Sack, D. A.,
J. D. Clemens,
S. Huda,
J. R. Harris,
M. R. Khan,
J. Chakraborty,
M. Yunus,
J. Gomes,
O. Siddique,
F. Ahmed,
B. Kay,
F. van Loon,
M. R. Rao,
A. M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren.
1991.
Antibody responses after immunization with killed oral cholera vaccines during the 1985 vaccine field trial in Bangladesh.
J. Infect. Dis.
164:407-411[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Tacket, C. O.,
B. Forrest,
R. Morona,
S. R. Attridge,
J. LaBrooy,
B. D. Tall,
M. Reymann,
D. Rowley, and M. M. Levine.
1990.
Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy against cholera challenge in humans of a typhoid-cholera hybrid vaccine derived from Salmonella typhi Ty21a.
Infect. Immun.
58:1620-1627[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Tacket, C. O.,
G. Losonsky,
J. P. Nataro,
L. Comstock,
J. Michalski,
R. Edelman,
J. B. Kaper, and M. M. Levine.
1995.
Initial clinical studies of CVD 112 Vibrio cholerae O139 live oral vaccine: safety and efficacy against experimental challenge.
J. Infect. Dis.
172:883-886[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Tacket, C. O.,
G. Losonsky,
J. P. Nataro,
S. J. Cryz, Jr.,
R. Edelman,
J. B. Kaper, and M. M. Levine.
1992.
Onset and duration of protective immunity in challenged volunteers after vaccination with live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR.
J. Infect. Dis.
166:837-841[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Tauxe, R. V., and P. A. Blake.
1992.
Epidemic cholera in Latin America.
JAMA
267:1388-1390[Free Full Text].
|
Infect Immun, May 1998, p. 1968-1972, Vol. 66, No. 5
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
RICHARDS, G. P., WATSON, M. A.
(2006). A simple fluorogenic method to detect Vibrio cholerae and Aeromonas hydrophila in well water for areas impacted by catastrophic disasters.. Am J Trop Med Hyg
75: 516-521
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garcia, L., Jidy, M. D., Garcia, H., Rodriguez, B. L., Fernandez, R., Ano, G., Cedre, B., Valmaseda, T., Suzarte, E., Ramirez, M., Pino, Y., Campos, J., Menendez, J., Valera, R., Gonzalez, D., Gonzalez, I., Perez, O., Serrano, T., Lastre, M., Miralles, F., del Campo, J., Maestre, J. L., Perez, J. L., Talavera, A., Perez, A., Marrero, K., Ledon, T., Fando, R.
(2005). The Vaccine Candidate Vibrio cholerae 638 Is Protective against Cholera in Healthy Volunteers. Infect. Immun.
73: 3018-3024
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Michetti, P
(2004). Experimental Helicobacter pylori infection in humans: a multifaceted challenge. Gut
53: 1220-1221
[Full Text]
-
Cohen, M. B., Giannella, R. A., Bean, J., Taylor, D. N., Parker, S., Hoeper, A., Wowk, S., Hawkins, J., Kochi, S. K., Schiff, G., Killeen, K. P.
(2002). Randomized, Controlled Human Challenge Study of the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Protective Efficacy of a Single Dose of Peru-15, a Live Attenuated Oral Cholera Vaccine. Infect. Immun.
70: 1965-1970
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qadri, F., Asaduzzaman, M., Wenneras, C., Mohi, G., Albert, M. J., Abdus Salam, M., Sack, R. B., Jertborn, M., R. McGhee, J., Sack, D. A., Holmgren, J.
(2000). Enterotoxin-Specific Immunoglobulin E Responses in Humans after Infection or Vaccination with Diarrhea-Causing Enteropathogens. Infect. Immun.
68: 6077-6081
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tacket, C. O., Cohen, M. B., Wasserman, S. S., Losonsky, G., Livio, S., Kotloff, K., Edelman, R., Kaper, J. B., Cryz, S. J., Giannella, R. A., Schiff, G., Levine, M. M.
(1999). Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicentered Trial of the Efficacy of a Single Dose of Live Oral Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR in Preventing Cholera following Challenge with Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba Three Months after Vaccination. Infect. Immun.
67: 6341-6345
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cohen, M. B., Giannella, R. A., Losonsky, G. A., Lang, D. R., Parker, S., Hawkins, J. A., Gunther, C., Schiff, G. A.
(1999). Validation and Characterization of a Human Volunteer Challenge Model for Cholera by Using Frozen Bacteria of the New Vibrio cholerae Epidemic Serotype, O139. Infect. Immun.
67: 6346-6349
[Abstract]
[Full Text]