Previous Article | Next Article 
Infect Immun, July 1998, p. 3128-3133, Vol. 66, No. 7
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Purification of the inlB Gene Product of
Listeria monocytogenes and Demonstration of Its
Biological Activity
Simone
Müller,1
Torsten
Hain,2
Philippos
Pashalidis,2
Andreas
Lingnau,1,
Eugen
Domann,2
Trinad
Chakraborty,2 and
Jürgen
Wehland1,*
Department of Cell Biology, GBF, Research
Center for Biotechnology, D-38124 Braunschweig,1
and
Institute of Medical Microbiology, Justus-Liebig
Universität Giessen, D-35392 Giessen,2
Germany
Received 6 February 1998/Returned for modification 24 March
1998/Accepted 15 April 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Entry of Listeria monocytogenes into nonphagocytic
cells requires the inlAB gene products. InlA and InlB are
bacterial cell wall-associated polypeptides that can be released by
sodium dodecyl sulfate treatment. By applying more gentle extraction
methods, we have purified InlB in its native form. Treatment of
bacteria with various nondenaturating agents including mutanolysin,
thiol reagents, sodium chloride, and detergents like Triton X-100 or 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate did not
release substantial amounts of InlB from the bacterial cell wall.
Instead, InlB was nearly quantitatively extracted in a solubilized form
by treatment of bacteria with 1 M Tris-Cl or other protonated amines at
pH 7.5. However, the reduced solubility of the extracted InlB in
low-salt buffers hampered further biochemical purification. A panel of
monoclonal antibodies against listerial Tris-Cl extracts containing
InlB was therefore produced to generate reagents for use in affinity
chromatography. One of the monoclonal antibodies enabled purification
of the InlB protein to homogeneity with relatively high yields. When
added externally, purified InlB associated with the surface of
noninvasive bacteria such as Listeria innocua or an
L. monocytogenes inlB2 mutant, where it promoted entry of
these strains into Vero cells >300- and 17-fold, respectively. This effect was even more dramatic for HeLa cells, where the observed invasion was increased about 9,000- and 4,000-fold, respectively. The
availability of purified native, invasion-competent InlB will allow
analysis of the molecular basis of InlB-mediated entry into tissue
culture cell lines in greater detail.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Listeria monocytogenes is
a gram-positive, facultative intracellular bacterium that causes
food-borne infections in animals and humans with severe implications,
especially for newborns and immunocompromised individuals. The initial
site of entry into the host normally occurs in the gut following
ingestion of Listeria-contaminated food. Subsequently
invading bacteria can breach the intestinal, placental, or blood-brain
barrier, leading to systemic infections. During this process, the
bacterium must also be capable of invading nonphagocytic parenchymal,
epithelial, and endothelial cells (14, 19, 21). Early
electron microscopic studies demonstrated the ability of this pathogen
to invade epithelial cells of the cornea and the intestine in vivo
(33, 34). A variety of nonphagocytic cell lines from
different tissues, including epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and
hepatocytes, can be infected in vitro with L. monocytogenes
(5, 17, 26). Like Salmonella,
Shigella, and Yersinia species, L. monocytogenes actively triggers its entry into these nonphagocytic
cells. This process, also termed induced phagocytosis, involves host
cell signalling pathways leading to rearrangements of the cortical
actin cytoskeleton (2, 13).
Transposon-induced mutagenesis enabled the isolation of noninvasive
mutants of L. monocytogenes and subsequently led to the identification of a genetic locus coding for the internalin A (InlA)
and internalin B (InlB) polypeptides, which were identified as proteins
with molecular weights of 88,000 and 65,000, respectively (17,
26). Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) generated against either internalin detected both the InlA and InlB polypeptides in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) cell wall extracts and culture supernatants of
L. monocytogenes. The expression of both polypeptides was
shown to be strongly dependent on growth temperature and the PrfA
regulator protein. Transcription analysis of the inlAB locus
revealed that these genes are transcribed both in an operon as well as
individually by PrfA-dependent and -independent mechanisms (9, 10,
26).
Evidence that InlA is involved in invasion of nonphagocytic cells stems
from genetic complementation studies, in which InlA when expressed in
noninvasive Listeria innocua rendered this strain invasive
for the human enterocyte cell line Caco-2 (17). InlA mediates entry into Caco-2 and other cell lines expressing its receptor, the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin (29). Entry of bacteria requires the surface-bound form of InlA, which is tethered
to the bacterial cell wall by a 20-amino-acid C-terminal region
harboring an LPXTG motif followed by a membrane-spanning region of
about 20 amino acids and a few positively charged amino acid residues
(9, 35).
Unlike InlA, InlB is highly enriched in cell wall extracts and only
weakly detectable in culture supernatants of L. monocytogenes (26). Despite its presence in cell wall
extracts of these bacteria, InlB is unusual because its primary
sequence harbors neither a C-terminal membrane anchor nor a cell wall
anchoring motif, both of which are present in the InlA polypeptide
(8, 9, 17). Recently, it has been shown that the
230-amino-acid C-terminal region comprising about three 80-amino-acid
repeats that start with the motif Gly-Trp (GW) is responsible for the
association of InlB with the bacterial cell wall (3).
By constructing isogenic chromosomal deletion mutants, it was recently
demonstrated that InlB is also a crucial virulence factor for L. monocytogenes. In mice infected intraperitoneally with
inlB deletion mutants, such strains were attenuated for
virulence in comparison to the wild-type strain (26). Dramsi
and colleagues (8) reported that the InlB polypeptide was
essential for entry into hepatocytes but not for invasion of epithelial
Caco-2 cells. Nevertheless, heterologous expression of inlB
in L. innocua failed to promote entry of this recombinant
strain into hepatocytic cell lines, suggesting that additional products
of L. monocytogenes are involved in the uptake
(8). Also, significant impairment of inlB2
deletion mutants was observed with respect to entry into different
epithelial-like cells, such as the human HEp-G2, HeLa, or A549 cells
(7, 26), and human umbilical vein endothelial cells
(32).
In this study, we sought independent experimental evidence that the
InlB polypeptide does indeed mediate bacterial adherence and
internalization. Here we report on a simple procedure to purify the
native inlB gene product of L. monocytogenes in
large quantities for biochemical and functional analysis. Purified InlB
was found to be highly active and promoted entry into two cell lines
when added externally to noninvasive Listeria strains.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, cultivation, and reagents.
The wild-type
L. innocua strain (NCTC 11288), L. monocytogenes
EGD (serotype 1/2) and the isogenic EGD inlB2 deletion
mutant, and the L. monocytogenes actA2/pERL3 50-1 strain
have been described previously (20, 26). All
Listeria strains were grown in brain heart infusion broth
(Difco, Detroit, Mich.) overnight at 37°C and with erythromycin (5 µg/ml) in the case of L. monocytogenes actA2/pERL3 50-1. All chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany,
unless indicated otherwise.
The African green monkey kidney cell line Vero (ATCC CCL81) and the
human epithelial-like cell line HeLa (ATCC CCL 2) were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma), and 1% nonessential amino acids
(Gibco) at 37°C in 10% CO2.
Extraction of bacterial cell wall proteins with SDS, Triton
X-100, CHAPS, and Tris-Cl.
Exponentially growing bacterial
cultures were harvested by centrifugation (6,000 × g
for 10 min) and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice at
room temperature. Pelleted bacteria were immediately resuspended in
approximately 0.5% of the original culture volume, using PBS
containing either 2% (wt/vol) SDS, 1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100, or 16.2 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS)
(27) or in Tris-Cl buffer at different concentrations and pH
values. Resuspended bacteria were incubated for 15 min at 37°C with
gentle shaking, except in the case of Tris-Cl extractions, for which
bacteria were incubated for 60 min on ice. Bacterial suspensions were
centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min; the supernatants were aliquoted and stored at
70°C.
Extraction with mutanolysin.
The bacterial pellet was
resuspended in an excess of ice-cold acetone following 10 min of
incubation on ice (15). After centrifugation (12,000 × g, 10 min), the pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris-Cl
(pH 6.8); 10 U of mutanolysin per ml was added, followed by overnight
incubation at 37°C with gentle shaking. After centrifugation
(12,000 × g, 10 min), the supernatants were aliquoted
and stored at
70°C.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) was done with 10% polyacrylamide gels. For
staining of the gels, a silver staining kit (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany)
was used. Immunoblotting was performed by a semidry method using
Immobilon P membranes (Millipore, Eschborn, Germany). After incubation
with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Dianova,
Hamburg, Germany), the blots were reacted by using a sensitive enhanced
chemiluminescence-based immunoblot assay (Amersham Buchler,
Braunschweig, Germany) as instructed by the vendor.
MAbs.
Tris-Cl extracts of L. monocytogenes
actA2/pERL3 50-1 (see above) were dialyzed against PBS, and
approximately 100 µg of protein was used for repeated immunizations
of three BALB/c mice. The immunization and fusion protocols have been
described previously (31). Hybridoma supernatants were
tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on separate
microtiter plates coated with Tris-Cl extracts of EGD or the isogenic
mutant EGD inlB2. Clones that were positive on EGD extracts
and negative on EGD inlB2 extracts were further analyzed by
immunoblotting prepared with Tris-Cl extracts of the EGD strain.
Positive clones were subcloned twice by limiting dilution, and
immunoglobulin subclasses were determined by using an isotyping kit
(Medac, Hamburg, Germany). Five InlB-specific MAbs of the
immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclass were further processed (see below). The
InlB-specific MAb IC100 has been described previously (26).
Purification of InlB. (i) Gel filtration and phenyl-Sepharose
chromatography.
Tris-Cl extracts were concentrated by
ultrafiltration (cutoff, 30 kDa) and dialyzed extensively against 20 mM
Tris-Cl (pH 7.6) containing 1 M NaCl. After high-speed centrifugation
(100,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C), the sample (3 ml) was
loaded onto a gel filtration column at 5 ml/min, using Sephacryl S-100
(XK; 1.9 by 90 cm; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) equilibrated with the
same buffer. For phenyl-Sepharose chromatography, concentrated Tris-Cl
extracts were dialyzed against 3 M NaCl-20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6). The
sample (5 ml) was loaded on a 1 ml phenyl-Sepharose HP column
(Pharmacia) equilibrated with the same buffer. InlB was eluted by a
continuous salt gradient starting with 3 M NaCl.
(ii) Affinity purification of InlB.
The InlB-specific MAbs
were purified from hybridoma culture supernatants on protein
A-Sepharose, immobilized on CNBr-activated Separose 4B (Pharmacia), and
incubated overnight at 4°C on a rotating device (batch method) with
Tris-Cl extracts of L. monocytogenes actA2/pERL3 50-1 previously dialyzed against PBS. After several PBS washes, portions of
the Sepharose affinity matrix were boiled with SDS sample buffer and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE as previously described (31). For
scaling up the affinity purification, the affinity matrix was filled
into an appropriate column, washed with PBS, and then washed with 1.5 M
NaCl in PBS to remove nonspecifically bound material. Before the
elution was started, the Sepharose was washed with 5 volumes of PBS.
Finally, the bound antigen was eluted with 0.1 M sodium citrate (pH
4.0). The eluted fractions were immediately neutralized with 1 M
Tris-Cl (pH 8.9) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Relevant fractions were
pooled, dialyzed against PBS, and concentrated by repeated
centrifugation in Centriprep-10 concentrators (Amicon, Witten, Germany)
at 4°C, using PBS.
Amino acid sequence analysis.
For N-terminal amino acid
sequence analysis, samples of trichloroacetic acid-precipitated
fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes (Problot; Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt,
Germany) with a mini trans-blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad)
for 2 h at 150 mA. The blot was then stained with amido black, and
the regions corresponding to the proteins of interest were excised and
subjected to analysis on an Applied Biosystems gas-phase sequenator
(model A470) equipped with an on-line phenylthiohydantoin amino acid
analyzer.
Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis.
To determine the
native form of purified InlB, sedimentation-diffusion equilibrium runs
were performed in a Beckman model F analytical ultracentrifuge. Samples
with InlB at 230, 490, and 700 µg/ml in PBS were run to equilibrium
in a 12-mm charcoal-filled Epon double-sector cell with sapphire
windows in a two-place AN-H rotor. Two independent runs were performed.
After 20 and 24 h, the samples were scanned at 280 nm and
evaluated as previously described (16).
Reassociation of externally added InlB to bacteria.
One
milliliter of an overnight culture of bacteria grown in brain heart
infusion broth was pelleted by centrifugation in an Eppendorf tube. The
resulting pellet was washed three times in PBS (pH 7.4) before addition
of various concentrations of purified InlB (4 and 10 µg/ml). The
mixture was incubated for 30 min at 30°C with continuous shaking
(Thermomixer; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), pelleted and washed five
times in PBS, resuspended in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium, and used
in the invasion assay as described previously (7).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Selective extraction of the native InlB from bacterial
pellets.
The inlB gene product was easily identified as
a distinct protein band of 65 kDa in SDS extracts of L. monocytogenes EGD and was also present in small amounts in
concentrated culture supernatants, where it showed extensive
degradation (26). We tested various buffer combinations
containing nondenaturing detergents or enzymes to extract the
inlB gene product in its native form from the surface of
L. monocytogenes.
For this purpose, sedimented bacteria were resuspended with small
volumes of buffers containing the respective reagents and incubated for
various times. Subsequently the supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
(Fig. 1A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 1B)
using the InlB-specific MAb IC100 (26). Figure 1 compares
different extraction methods using SDS, Triton X-100, CHAPS, and
mutanolysin. In comparison with the SDS treatment (Fig. 1, lane 1),
neither nonionic detergents such as CHAPS (Fig. 1, lane 2), Triton
X-100 (Fig. 1, lane 3), nor mutanolysin (Fig. 1, lane 4) were not
effective; only small quantities of InlB were released, compared to a
number of proteins other than InlB that were extracted in relatively large amounts. Treatment of Listeria pellets with high-salt
solutions such as 1 M NaCl was also ineffective, as were treatments
with reducing agents such as 10 mM dithiothreitol (data not shown). To
our surprise, InlB was efficiently and very selectively released from
the bacterial surface upon incubation with buffers containing high
Tris-Cl concentrations (Fig. 1, lane 5). Triethanolamine chloride,
imidazole, and ammonium chloride were also effective, but uncharged
hydroxylamine was not (data not shown). As shown in lane 5 of Fig. 1,
only small quantities of other listerial surface proteins were
extracted by Tris-Cl, and the most predominant contaminating
polypeptide showed a molecular weight slightly higher than that of InlB
when analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Analysis of extracts generated by treatment of L. monocytogenes with different detergents and other reagents. (A)
Silver-stained SDS-gel (10%). Extracts were obtained by treating
bacterial pellets (strain actA2/pERL3 50-1) with 2% SDS
(lane 1), 16.2 mM CHAPS (lane 2), 1% Triton X-100 (lane 3),
mutanolysin (lane 4), and 1 M Tris-Cl (pH 7.5) (lane 5). (B)
Corresponding immunoblot reacted with InlB MAb IC100. Note that InlB
was selectively extracted by Tris-Cl in lane 5. The arrow indicates the
InlB protein band. Molecular mass markers (bars on the left), from top
to bottom: 97, 66, 45, and 31 kDa.
|
|
To optimize the extraction conditions, we varied both the Tris-Cl
concentration and the pH. The best results were obtained with 1 M
Tris-Cl within a pH range of 7.25 to 8.0, where Tris is protonated
(Fig. 2). As described above, the InlB
was not extractable with 1 M NaCl, indicating that it was not the high
ionic strength but rather a Tris effect that resulted in efficient
release of InlB from the bacterial surface. The Tris-effect seems to be
specific for amine functions, and although amines could act through
various mechanisms, we assume that specific amino-carboxylate salt
bridges may be involved in anchoring InlB to components of the cell
wall. The high isoelectric point of InlB of 10.1 suggests that Tris might compete with the free amino groups of InlB that can interact with
constituents of the cell wall. Similar Tris effects were described by
Keen et al. (25), using 0.5 M Tris-Cl (pH 6.5) for
reversibly dissociating the components of isolated coated vesicles. In
that case, the Tris effect has been successfully used to identify and
purify the various protein constituents of coated vesicles
(36).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of varying pH values on the extraction of InlB
from bacterial pellets. The pH of the Tris-Cl buffer was adjusted to
7.0 (lane 1), 7.25 (lane 2), 7.5 (lane 3), 8.0 (lane 4), and 9.0 (lane
5). (A) Silver-stained extracts; (B) corresponding immunoblot reacted
with InlB-specific MAb IC100. Molecular mass markers (bars on the left)
indicate 66 kDa.
|
|
To verify the identity of the InlB polypeptide, we determined the
N-terminal amino acid sequence of the 65-kDa band (Fig. 1). The
resulting sequence, ETITVSTP, corresponded to amino acid residues 35 to
42 of the InlB sequence (17, 26). In our initial experiments, we used L. monocytogenes EGD/pERL3 50-1 for
extractions with Tris-Cl. This recombinant strain harbors additional
copies of the prfA gene and expressed larger amounts not
only of the InlB polypeptide but also of the other listerial virulence
factors (20). The N-terminal sequence analysis revealed
contamination of the InlB protein band with ActA degradation products
(data not shown), which prompted us to use the isogenic L. monocytogenes EGD actA deletion mutant, complemented
with prfA (actA2/pERL3 50-1), for further
purification of InlB.
Purification of InlB and generation of new InlB-specific MAbs.
When we tried to isolate InlB from the bacterial Tris-Cl extracts with
biochemical methods, the rather unusual nature of the protein
complicated the application of standard chromatography material. To
apply ion-exchange chromatography (Mono-Q and Mono-S), the Tris-Cl
extract was dialyzed against buffers with low ionic strength (20 mM
Tris-Cl or 20 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.5]). Under these conditions,
InlB was readily sedimentable by low-speed centrifugation.
By testing several standard buffers in combination with high-speed
centrifugation, we found that InlB remained soluble in solutions of
moderate ionic strength such as PBS. However, interaction of InlB with
standard ion-exchange material was drastically reduced under these
conditions. When Tris-Cl extracts were chromatographed on a Sephacryl
S-100 column equilibrated with 1 M NaCl-20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6),
low-molecular-weight proteins were easily separable from the InlB
fraction, which still contained a protein with a slightly higher
molecular weight of approximately 70,000. Even though the use of a
phenyl-Sepharose matrix enabled the separation of InlB from the 70-kDa
polypeptide (data not shown), a combination of both chromatography
procedures was not satisfactory due to the low yield of purified InlB.
We therefore tried to establish a more convenient purification protocol
for InlB.
We previously succeeded in purifying the ActA polypeptide from
concentrated crude Listeria culture supernatants by affinity chromatography using ActA-specific MAbs (31). Since the
available InlB-specific MAb IC100 poorly reacted with the native InlB
protein (data not shown), we generated a new panel of InlB-specific
MAbs by immunizing mice with Tris-Cl extracts of the InlB-overproducing actA2/pERL3 50-1 strain. Hybridoma supernatants were
screened by ELISA using microtiter plates coated with Tris-Cl extracts derived from the EGD wild-type strain and its isogenic inlB2
mutant, respectively. Supernatants only positive on the EGD extracts
were then further analyzed by immunoblotting using Tris-Cl extracts from the EGD wild-type strain and from the isogenic inlB
deletion mutant. We selected InlB-specific hybridomas that produced
IgGs and purified them from culture supernatants on protein
A-Sepharose. Purified IgGs were immobilized on activated Sepharose 4B
and incubated with the Tris-Cl extracts that had been dialyzed
extensively against PBS. Washing and elution conditions were tested as
recently described for the immunoaffinity purification of ActA
(31). One of the MAbs tested, clone IF32, was found to
recognize and to bind the native InlB polypeptide present in the
Tris-Cl extracts. Following overnight incubation of dialyzed Tris-Cl
extracts with immobilized IF32 MAb, the affinity matrix was processed
as described in Materials and Methods. InlB was not dissociated from
the immobilized MAbs by extensively washing the affinity matrix with
buffer containing 1.5 M NaCl. This rather stringent treatment enabled
the removal of nonspecifically adsorbed contaminants. Elution
conditions were optimized in terms of ionic strength and pH (data not
shown), and InlB was quantitatively eluted with 0.1 M citrate at pH
4.0. Positive fractions were pooled and revealed a single band at 65 kDa on silver-stained SDS-gels (Fig. 3,
lane 2). N-terminal amino acid sequencing of the purified protein
immobilized on a blot membrane gave the sequence ETITVSTPIKQIF,
identical to that of the predicted sequence of secreted InlB (17,
26). The immunoaffinity purification procedure yielded
approximately 1 mg of pure InlB from 4.5 liters of
stationary-growth-phase bacterial cultures. Due to the relatively mild
elution conditions at pH 4.0, the affinity matrix was reusable for
several purification cycles without any measurable loss of activity.
Thus, the affinity chromatography using the InlB-specific MAb IF32
turned out to be a very convenient purification procedure. Within one
purification step, this rapid method yielded large quantities of
homogeneous InlB from crude Tris extracts, enabling further
characterization of this polypeptide.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Purification of InlB from Tris-Cl extracts of L. monocytogenes by immunoaffinity chromatography. (A) Silver-stained
SDS-gel (10%) of the Tris-Cl extract of L. monocytogenes
actA2/pERL3 50-1 (lane 1) which was incubated with immobilized MAb
IF32. After extensive washing of the matrix, InlB was eluted with 0.1 M
sodium citrate, pH 4.0 (lane 2). (B) Corresponding immunoblot reacted
with MAb IC100. Molecular mass markers (bars on the left), from top to
bottom: 97, 66, and 45 kDa.
|
|
To determine the native form of purified InlB under physiological
conditions, we performed sedimentation-diffusion equilibrium runs in
PBS at different protein concentrations, using an analytical ultracentrifuge. At protein concentrations between 100 and 700 µg/ml,
no self-association of InlB was detectable (data not shown), suggesting
that under physiological conditions the purified InlB polypeptide is a
stable, monomeric protein.
Purified InlB promotes efficient internalization of noninvasive
listeriae.
It was recently shown that prior incubation of spent
culture supernatants of InlB-expressing bacteria confers invasiveness to an inlB mutant (3). This study was recently
extended by assessing the ability of purified recombinant InlB proteins
expressed in Escherichia coli to promote invasion of an
inlB mutant and noninvasive L. innocua
(4). We used this assay to assess the activity of the
purified InlB protein by examining the ability of externally added
purified InlB to promote the invasivity of the wild-type L. monocytogenes EGD strain, an isogenic inlB2 mutant, and
a noninvasive L. innocua strain. Preincubation of bacteria with purified InlB resulted in strong association of the protein with
the bacterial cell wall, which was readily visible in Coomassie blue-stained SDS extracts of the inlB2 mutant strain (Fig.
4A). Specific association of InlB to the
bacterial surface was confirmed by using MAb IF32, specific for InlB
(Fig. 4B). In invasion assays, the addition of increasing amounts of
purified InlB to noninvasive strains rendered them highly competent for
entry into the Vero tissue culture cell line. Thus, in the experiment
presented, prior addition of InlB at 4 µg/ml increased invasion of
the inlB2 mutant 17-fold and that of a noninvasive L. innocua strain greater than 300-fold (Fig.
5). No increase in invasion was observed
using the wild-type strain for this cell line. The results were more dramatic when invasion was examined in the epithelial-like cell line
HeLa. Thus, externally added InlB at 4 µg/ml increased invasion of
the wild-type strain, the inlB2 mutant, and L. innocua 6-, 3,700-, and 9,000-fold, respectively (Fig. 5). These
results demonstrate that the purified native InlB isolated in this
study is highly active and promotes invasion of noninvasive bacteria
into two different cell lines.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Purified InlB binds to the surface of L. monocytogenes. Bacteria (108/ml) of the L. monocytogenes EGD inlB2 mutant were incubated with 4 µg of purified InlB for 30 min at room temperature as described in
Materials and Methods and analyzed following SDS-PAGE by Coomassie blue
staining (A) or immunoblotting using InlB-specific MAb IC100 (B). SDS
extracts from the L. monocytogenes EGD inlB2
mutant (lane1) and the same mutant preincubated with 4 µg of purified
InlB (lane 2). The position of InlB in panel A is indicated by an
arrow. Molecular mass markers (bars on the left), from top to bottom:
97, 66, 45, 31, 21, and 14 kDa.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Externally added purified InlB protein enhances entry of
invasive and noninvasive Listeria strains into Vero (A) and
HeLa (B) cell lines. Bacteria were either not treated or preincubated
with InlB at 4 µg/ml before performance of the invasion assay as
described previously (10). Values along the vertical axis
are given relative to the invasion of wild-type strain EGD, which is
arbitrarily fixed at 100. Bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
Braun et al. (4) previously reported very similar results,
e.g., that purified recombinant InlB expressed in E. coli
promoted, when added externally, entry of noninvasive listeriae into
Vero cells. Compared with our entry rates of reconstituted, formerly noninvasive Listeria strains, InlB purified from L. monocytogenes seems to be more active than that expressed in
E. coli. Further evidence that InlB is sufficient to promote
entry into several nonphagocytic cell lines stems from experiments in
which inert latex beads coated with purified InlB were internalized by
Vero, HEp-2, and HeLa cells (4).
The invasion of nonphagocytic cells by bacterial pathogens has
extensively been studied for the gram-negative genera
Salmonella, Yersinia, and Shigella
(11, 18, 24, 28, 30; for further references, see
references 2 and 13). In the case
of Yersinia, these studies have led to the identification of
a bacterial ligand, invasin, and its cellular receptor,
1 integrin,
both of which serve as paradigms for studying bacterial invasion into
nonphagocytic cells (23). Among gram-positive bacteria, the
pathogenic mechanisms of L. monocytogenes have been studied
extensively in the past few years. Analysis of the invasion process of
L. monocytogenes has recently led to the identification of
the internalin gene family (17) and E-cadherin as the
cellular receptor of the InlA polypeptide (29).
Unlike InlA, no protocols have yet been established for the
purification of InlB from L. monocytogenes except that for
recombinant InlB expressed in E. coli (3, 4). For
InlA, purification of the protein was achieved by using concentrated
supernatant cultures. However, InlB is hardly detectable in supernatant
fluids but could be nearly quantitatively extracted from the bacterial cell wall by using 1 M Tris-Cl. Such extracts were almost devoid of
other contaminating proteins, suggesting that this extraction procedure
exploits an unusual property of the InlB protein. Purified InlB is a
monomeric protein that is capable of conferring invasive properties to
normally noninvasive bacteria for two different cell lines. This
finding provides strong evidence that InlB can by itself bind to the
surface of eucaryotic cells and promote invasion. We found that InlB
did not promote invasion of bacteria into the Caco-2 enterocytic cell
line (data not shown), indicating that entry into Vero and HeLa cells
are InlB dependent, a result that is consistent with previously
published data for deletion and complementation mutants of L. monocytogenes (10, 26).
The observed association of purified InlB with the cell wall of either
L. monocytogenes and L. innocua suggests that it
interacts with a surface molecule that is common to both pathogenic and nonpathogenic Listeria species. The association of
externally added InlB to its potential receptor on the bacterial
surface was extremely strong and could be released only by SDS
extraction (Fig. 4) or the Tris-based extraction method developed in
this study (data not shown). Similar association of cell wall proteins from gram-positive bacteria to receptors on the bacterial surface have
been previously demonstrated. Thus, the C-terminal repeat domains of
Streptococcus pneumoniae amidase promotes binding to choline
within the bacterial cell wall (6). The secreted
bacteriocin, lysostaphin of Staphylococcus simulans, binds
specifically to the surface of Staphylococcus aureus, where
it cleaves peptidoglycan. In this case, the target cell specificity is
conferred by a 92-amino-acid C-terminal region (1) that had
previously been shown to harbor some homology to the 80-amino-acid GW
repeat in InlB of L. monocytogenes (3). Since
externally added InlB promotes invasion, it will be of great interest
to identify the bacterial InlB cell wall receptor required for this
interaction.
The simple and rapid purification of InlB by immunoaffinity
chromatography should now stimulate more studies on its biological properties. We have examined its ability to associate with only two
cell lines here; these studies can now be expanded to include both
primary cell cultures and various tissue culture cell lines. Thus, it
will be possible to determine the region(s) on the InlB molecule
required for interaction with host cell receptors. The simple invasion
assay used in this study can now also be applied to examine the
adhesive and invasive properties of the other
leucine-rich-repeat-containing proteins of L. monocytogenes,
such as InlA and IrpA (7, 12). Thus, events within the host
cell, such as increase in phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity, that are
required for bacterially mediated entry (22) can now be
directly examined by assessing the ability of purified recombinant InlB
mutant proteins to promote bacterial invasion. Finally, purification of
the InlB protein now makes it possible to identify the ligand that it
binds to on the surface of the eucaryotic cell.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Rita Getzlaff and Michael Kieß for amino acid sequence
analysis and Josef Floßdorf for the analytical ultracentrifugation analysis.
This work was supported in part by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft to T.C. (SFB 249 TP/A13) and E.D. (SFB 535 TP/A5).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Gesellschaft
für Biotechnologische Forschung, Abteilung Zellbiologie,
Mascheroder Weg 1, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany. Phone:
49-531-6181-415. Fax: 49-531-6181-444. E-mail: jwe{at}gbf.de.
Present address: Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington
University Medical School, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Editor: S. H. E. Kaufmann
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baba, T., and O. Schneewind.
1996.
Target cell specificity of a bacterocin molecule: a C-terminal signal directs lysostaphin to the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus.
EMBO J.
15:4789-4797[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bliska, J. B.,
J. E. Galan, and S. Falkow.
1993.
Signal transduction in the mammalian cell during bacterial attachment and entry.
Cell
73:903-920[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Braun, L.,
S. Dramsi,
P. Dehoux,
H. Bierne,
G. Lindahl, and P. Cossart.
1997.
InlB: an invasion protein of Listeria monocytogenes with a novel type of surface association.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:285-294[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Braun, L.,
H. Ohayon, and P. Cossart.
1998.
The InlB protein of Listeria monocytogenes is sufficient to promote entry into mammalian cells.
Mol. Microbiol.
27:1077-1087[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cossart, P., and J. Mengaud.
1989.
Listeria monocytogenes: a model system for the molecular study of intracellular parasitism.
Mol. Biol. Med.
6:463-474[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Díaz, E.,
E. García,
C. Ascaso,
E. Méndez,
R. López, and J. L. García.
1989.
Subcellular localization of the major pneumococcal autolysin: a peculiar mechanism of secretion in Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:1238-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Domann, E.,
S. Zechel,
A. Lingnau,
T. Hain,
A. Darji,
T. Nichterlein,
J. Wehland, and T. Chakraborty.
1997.
Identification and characterization of a novel PrfA-regulated gene in Listeria monocytogenes whose product, IrpA, is highly homologous to internalin proteins, which contain leucine-rich repeats.
Infect. Immun.
65:101-109[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Dramsi, S.,
I. Biswas,
E. Maguin,
L. Braun,
P. Mastroeni, and P. Cossart.
1995.
Entry of Listeria monocytogenes into hepatocytes requires expression of inlB, a surface protein of the internalin multigene family.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:251-261[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Dramsi, S.,
P. Dehoux, and P. Cossart.
1993.
Common features of Gram-positive bacterial proteins involved in cell recognition.
Mol. Microbiol.
9:1119-1121[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dramsi, S.,
C. Kocks,
C. Forestier, and P. Cossart.
1993.
Internalin-mediated invasion of epithelial cells by Listeria monocytogenes is regulated by the bacterial growth state, temperature and the pleiotropic activator prfA.
Mol. Microbiol.
9:931-941[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Elsinghorst, E. S.,
L. S. Baron, and D. J. Kopecko.
1989.
Penetration of human intestinal epithelial cells by Salmonella: molecular cloning and expression of Salmonella typhi in invasion determinants in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:5173-5177[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Engelbrecht, F.,
S. Chun,
C. Ochs,
F. Lottspeich,
W. Goebel, and Z. Sokolovic.
1996.
A new PrfA-regulated gene of Listeria monocytogenes encoding a small, secreted protein which belongs to the family of internalins.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:823-837[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Falkow, S.,
R. R. Isberg, and D. A. Portnoy.
1992.
The interaction of bacteria with mammalian cells.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8:333-363.
|
| 14.
|
Farber, J. M., and P. J. Peterkin.
1991.
Listeria monocytogenes, a foodborne pathogen.
Microbiol. Rev.
55:476-511[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Fliss, I.,
E. Emond,
R. E. Simard, and S. Pandian.
1991.
A rapid and efficient method of lysis of Listeria and other gram-positive bacteria using mutanolysin.
BioTechniques
11:453-457.
[Medline] |
| 16.
|
Floßdorf, J.
1980.
Erweiterte Meßmöglichkeiten in der analytischen Ultrazentrifugation durch die Verwendung eines neuartigen Kollimators.
Makromol. Chem.
181:715-724.
|
| 17.
|
Gaillard, J.-L.,
P. Berche,
C. Frehel,
E. Gouin, and P. Cossart.
1991.
Entry of Listeria monocytogenes into cells is mediated by internalin, a repeat protein reminiscent of surface antigens from positive cocci.
Cell
65:1127-1141[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Galàn, J. E., and R. Curtiss, III.
1989.
Cloning and molecular characterization of genes whose products allow Salmonella typhimurium to penetrate tissue culture cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6383-6387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Gellin, B. G., and C. V. Broome.
1989.
Listeriosis.
JAMA
261:1313-1320[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gerstel, B.,
L. Gröbe,
S. Pistor,
T. Chakraborty, and J. Wehland.
1996.
The ActA polypeptides of Listeria ivanovii and Listeria monocytogenes harbor binding sites for host microfilament proteins.
Infect. Immun.
64:1929-1939[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Gray, M. L., and A. H. Killinger.
1966.
Listeria monocytogenes and listeric infections.
Bacteriol. Rev.
30:309-382[Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Ireton, K.,
B. Payrastre,
H. Chap,
W. Ogawa,
H. Sakaue,
M. Kasuga, and P. Cossart.
1996.
A role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase in bacterial invasion.
Science
274:780-782[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Isberg, R. R., and J. M. Leong.
1990.
Multiple beta 1 chain integrins are receptors for invasin, a protein that promotes bacterial penetration into mammalian cells.
Cell
60:861-871[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Isberg, R. R.,
D. L. Voorhis, and S. Falkow.
1987.
Identification of invasin: a protein that allows enteric bacteria to penetrate cultured mammalian cells.
Cell
50:769-778[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Keen, J. H.,
M. C. Willingham, and I. H. Pastan.
1979.
Clathrin-coated vesicles: isolation, dissociation and factor dependent reassociation of clathrin baskets.
Cell
16:303-312[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lingnau, A.,
E. Domann,
M. Hudel,
M. Bock,
T. Nichterlein,
J. Wehland, and T. Chakraborty.
1995.
Expression of the Listeria monocytogenes EGD inlA and inlB genes, whose products mediate bacterial entry into tissue culture cell lines, by prfA-dependent and -independent mechanisms.
Infect. Immun.
63:3896-3903[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Liscia, D. S.,
T. Alhadi, and B. K. Vonderhaar.
1982.
Solubilization of active prolactin receptors by nondenaturing zwitterionic detergent.
J. Biol. Chem.
257:9401-9405[Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Maurelli, A. T., and P. J. Sansonetti.
1988.
Genetic determinants of Shigella pathogenicity.
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
42:127-150[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Mengaud, J.,
H. Ohayon,
P. Gounon,
R.-M. Mege, and P. Cossart.
1996.
E-cadherin is the receptor for internalin, a surface protein required for entry of L. monocytogenes into epithelial cells.
Cell
84:923-932[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Miller, V. L., and S. Falkow.
1988.
Evidence for two genetic loci in Yersinia enterocolitica that can promote invasion of epithelial cells.
Infect. Immun.
56:1242-1248[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Niebuhr, K.,
T. Chakraborty,
M. Rohde,
T. Gazlig,
B. Jansen,
P. Köllner, and J. Wehland.
1993.
Localization of the ActA polypeptide of Listeria monocytogenes in infected tissue culture cell lines: ActA is not associated with actin "comets."
Infect. Immun.
61:2793-2802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Parida, S. K.,
E. Domann,
M. Rohde,
S. Müller,
A. Darji,
T. Hain,
J. Wehland, and T. Chakraborty.
1998.
Internalin B is essential for adhesion and mediates the invasion of Listeria monocytogenes into human endothelial cells.
Mol. Microbiol.
28:81-95[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Racz, P.,
K. Tenner, and E. Mero.
1972.
Experimental Listeria enteritis. I. An electron microscopic study of the epithelial phase in experimental Listeria infection.
Lab. Invest. Methods Cell Biol.
26:694-700.
|
| 34.
|
Racz, P.,
K. Tenner, and K. Szivessy.
1970.
Electron microscopic studies in experimental keratoconjunctivitis listeriosa. I. Penetration of Listeria monocytogenes into corneal epithelial cells.
Acta Microbiol. Hung.
17:221-236.
|
| 35.
|
Schneewind, O.,
D. Mihaylova-Petkov, and P. Model.
1993.
Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria.
EMBO J.
12:4803-4811[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Ungewickell, E., and L. Oestergaard.
1989.
Identification of the clathrin assembly protein AP180 in crude calf brain extracts by two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Anal. Biochem.
179:352-356[Medline].
|
Infect Immun, July 1998, p. 3128-3133, Vol. 66, No. 7
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Vazquez-Boland, J. A., Kuhn, M., Berche, P., Chakraborty, T., Dominguez-Bernal, G., Goebel, W., Gonzalez-Zorn, B., Wehland, J., Kreft, J.
(2001). Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
14: 584-640
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marino, M., Braun, L., Cossart, P., Ghosh, P.
(2000). A framework for interpreting the leucine-rich repeats of the Listeria internalins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 8784-8788
[Abstract]
[Full Text]