This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frost, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jakubowski, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frost, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jakubowski, W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun, August 1998, p. 4008-4009, Vol. 66, No. 8
0019-9567/98/$00.00+0

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Serologic Response to Human Cryptosporidium Infections

    LETTER
Top
Letter
References

Okhuysen et al. (9) reported the susceptibilities and serologic responses of 19 healthy human volunteers rechallenged with Cryptosporidium oocysts. Their finding that less-severe symptoms were observed when volunteers were rechallenged supports our interpretation of the Cryptosporidium outbreak literature and may explain the difficulty in linking reported cases of cryptosporidiosis with water supplies that are chronically contaminated with oocysts (3); however, the low correlation observed between serum antibody response and infection requires clarification. The serological findings are based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in which the antibody responses to all antigens obtained from Cryptosporidium oocysts were measured (2). Miller (6), Voller (11), and others (10) suggested that because of the complex array of parasite antigens, ELISAs for parasite immunodiagnosis should use immunodominant antigens rather than extracts of the whole parasite. It is possible that seroconversion, based on either an ELISA which uses purified antigens or Western blotting (WB), may have more accurately estimated the rate of Cryptosporidium infection in these volunteers (7).

We compared serum antibody responses to Cryptosporidium antigens determined by an ELISA for combined immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM responses (4) and those by a WB assay for IgG responses to 15/17-kDa and 27-kDa antigen groups (8) using 117 serum samples collected in the spring of 1992 during a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in Jackson County, Oreg. (5). The intensity of the WB and the optical density of the ELISA responses were measured and analyzed as a ratio of the unknown sample and the positive control response (4). Low correlations were found between the ELISA and WB results: Pearson correlations for the IgG response to the 15/17- and 27-kDA antigens and for the IgA response to the 27-kDa antigen were 0.17, 0.42, and 0.35, respectively.

More than half of 34 ELISA-negative individuals had WB responses greater than 20% of the positive control in one or more bands. If the ELISA is less sensitive and specific than the WB, then by using the ELISA, Okhuysen et al. may have misclassified seroconversions as well as those volunteers who were considered seronegative at the outset of the study. Some ELISA-seronegative volunteers may have been WB seropositive. These WB-seropositive individuals may have been less susceptible to illness and, based on the definition of infection used, less likely to have become infected upon rechallenge.

Finally, the definition of infection used in the rechallenge study (being oocyst positive or having illness) differed from that (being oocyst positive) used in an earlier study by these authors (2), but neither definition considers the possibility of volunteers being asymptomatically infected but stool negative for oocysts. The same authors previously reported that oocyst stool-positive but asymptomatic volunteers excreted fewer oocysts than did stool-positive and symptomatic volunteers (1). This possibility suggests that other asymptomatically infected individuals with low numbers of oocysts in their stools may have been misclassified as uninfected. By using the occurrence of illness to identify 10 of 13 infected persons in this study, the authors may have inadvertently mingled risk factors for infection with risk factors for illness from an infection.

    REFERENCES
Top
Letter
References

1. Chappell, C. L., P. C. Okhuysen, C. R. Sterling, and H. L. DuPont. 1996. Cryptosporidium parvum: intensity of infection and oocyst excretion patterns in health volunteers. J. Infect. Dis. 173:232-236[Medline].
2. DuPont, H. L., C. L. Chappell, C. R. Sterling, P. C. Okhuysen, J. B. Rose, and W. Jakubowski. 1995. The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:855-859[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Frost, F. J., G. F. Craun, R. L. Calderon, and S. A. Hubbs. 1997. So many oocysts, so few outbreaks. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 89(12):8-9.
4. Frost, F. J., A. A. de la Cruz, D. M. Moss, M. Curry, and R. L. Calderon. Comparisons of ELISA and Western blot assays for detection of Cryptosporidium antibody. Epidemiol. Infect., in press.
5. Leland, D., J. McAnulty, W. Keene, and G. Sterens. 1983. A cryptosporidiosis outbreak in a filtered-water supply. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 85:34-42.
6. Miller, H. R. 1990. Immunity to internal parasites. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot. 9:301-344.
7. Moss, D. M., S. N. Bennett, M. J. Arrowood, S. P. Wahlquist, and P. J. Lammie. 1998. Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot analysis of a cryptosporidiosis outbreak on a United States Coast Guard cutter. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51:110-118.
8. Moss, D. M., S. N. Bennett, M. J. Arrowood, M. R. Hurd, P. J. Lammie, and S. P. Wahlquist. 1994. Kinetic and isotypic analysis of specific immunoglobulins for crew members with cryptosporidiosis on a U.S. Coast Guard cutter. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 41:52S-455S[Medline].
9. Okhuysen, P. C., C. L. Chappell, C. R. Sterling, W. Jakubowski, and H. L. DuPont. Susceptibility and Serological Response of Healthy Adults to Reinfection with Cryptosporidium parvum. Infect. Immun. 66:441-443.
10. Venkatesan, P., and D. Wakelin. 1993. ELISAs for parasitologists: or lies, damn lies and ELISAs. Parasitol. Today 9:225-239. [Medline]
11. Voller, A. 1993. Immunosassays for tropical parasitic infections. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87:497-498[Medline].
Floyd J. Frost
Southwest Center for Managed Care Research
2425 Ridgecrest SW
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108
Gunther F. Craun
Gunther F. Craun and Associates
Professional Building
101 West Ferderick Street
Staunton, Virginia 24401

    AUTHORS' REPLY
Top
Letter
References

Frost and Craun question the sensitivity and relevance of the ELISA in estimating the rate of infection in our volunteer studies and suggest that immunobloting could offer a more sensitive indicator of infection.

The objectives of our study were to describe the susceptibility to reinfection as defined by clinical outcomes and oocyst shedding in volunteers after reexposure to Cryptosporidium parvum and, secondly, to evaluate in a prospective fashion the serologic responses to a crude antigen preparation. We believe that to use seroconversion to define an outcome (infection) would have been inappropriate in this particular study.

Regarding the relevance of ELISA seropositivity, the proportion of immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion was low after primary exposure but increased upon reexposure. This finding has significant epidemiologic implications. In a recent study (1), the 50% infective dose for volunteers with preexisting antibodies (by ELISA) was found to found be 20-fold higher than that for antibody-negative volunteers (1). Thus, the presence of antibodies to C. parvum as determined by ELISA provides a useful marker for resistance to subsequent low-dose exposures.

ELISA and immunoblot discrepancies may be due to differences in the array or conformation of antigens available for binding in each system. We believe that both methods will continue to be valuable, although the information that each provides addresses different issues. In collaboration with colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, immunoblot studies were conducted with sera collected from ELISA-negative volunteers prior to challenge (2), and low-molecular-weight antigens were recognized in 93%. This high positivity rate in a defined population in the absence of any recent diarrheal illness or known recent outbreak in the Houston, Tex., area suggests that Cryptosporidium antigens may contain cross-reactive epitopes revealed by Western blotting. Furthermore, 17 of 18 volunteers who became infected after oocyst challenge had prechallenge Western blot reactivity.

In their letter, Frost and Craun report Western blot results conducted with samples from convalescent patients following a Cryptosporidum outbreak. Their definition of seroconversion was determined by comparing the intensity of the reaction versus that of a reference as opposed to the same individual over time as was done in our study. The utilization of Western blotting in a retrospective fashion in the absence of microbiological data to determine infection may be fraught with bias, given the high proportion of individuals with background positivity and the fact that the number of exposures and the time of last exposure are not known.

Frost and Craun further suggest that some individuals who experienced asymptomatic infection and had no detectable oocysts may have been misclassified as uninfected. The definition of C. parvum infection in our study included clinical and microbiological criteria to encompass subjects experiencing illness, some of whom may have been excreting oocysts below the level of detection by direct immunoflorescence assay. It is possible that a number of individuals in whom oocytes are not detectable may experience asymptomatic infections. Clearly, improved detection methods are needed for the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium infection.

    REFERENCES
Top
Letter
References

1. Chappell, C. L., P. C. Okhuysen, C. R. Sterling, C. Wang, W. Jakubowski, and H. L. DuPont. Infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy adults with pre-existing anti-C. parvum IgG. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., in press.
2. Lammie, P. J., C. L. Chappell, D. M. Moss, P. C. Okhuysen, A. W. Hightower, M. J. Arrowood, and H. L. DuPont. Immunoblot analysis of antibody reactivity from volunteers experimentally exposed to C. parvum. J. Infect. Dis., in press.
Pablo C. Okhuysen
Cynthia L. Chappell
Division of Infectious Diseases
The University of Texas Medical School
Houston, Texas
Herbert L. DuPont
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas
Charles R. Sterling
School of Veterinary Medicine
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona
Walter Jakubowski
Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio


Infect Immun, August 1998, p. 4008-4009, Vol. 66, No. 8
0019-9567/98/$00.00+0



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Muller, T. B., Frost, F. J., Craun, G. F., Calderon, R. L., Chappell, C. L., Okhuysen, P. C., Dann, S. M. (2001). Serological Responses to Cryptosporidium Infection. Infect. Immun. 69: 1974-1975 [Full Text]  
  • Frost, F. J, Muller, T., Craun, G. F, Fraser, D., Thompson, D., Notenboom, R., Calderon, R. L (2000). Serological analysis of a cryptosporidiosis epidemic. Int J Epidemiol 29: 376-379 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frost, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jakubowski, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frost, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jakubowski, W.