Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, September 1998, p. 4299-4304, Vol. 66, No. 9
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Effectiveness of Liposomes Possessing
Surface-Linked Recombinant B Subunit of Cholera Toxin as an Oral
Antigen Delivery System
Evlambia
Harokopakis,
George
Hajishengallis, and
Suzanne M.
Michalek*
Departments of Microbiology and Oral Biology,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Received 22 December 1997/Returned for modification 7 April
1998/Accepted 23 June 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Liposomes appear to be a promising oral antigen delivery system for
the development of vaccines against infectious diseases, although their
uptake efficiency by Peyer's patches in the gut and the subsequent
induction of mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses remain a major
concern. Aiming at targeted delivery of liposomal immunogens, we have
previously reported the conjugation via a thioether bond of the
GM1 ganglioside-binding subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) to
the liposomal outer surface. In the present study, we have investigated
the effectiveness of liposomes containing the saliva-binding region
(SBR) of Streptococcus mutans AgI/II adhesin and possessing
surface-linked recombinant CTB (rCTB) in generating mucosal (salivary,
vaginal, and intestinal) IgA as well as serum IgG responses to the
parent molecule, AgI/II. Responses in mice given a single oral dose of
the rCTB-conjugated liposomes were compared to those in mice given one
of the following unconjugated liposome preparations: (i) empty
liposomes, (ii) liposomes containing SBR, (iii) liposomes containing
SBR and coadministered with rCTB, and (iv) liposomes containing SBR
plus rCTB. Three weeks after the primary immunization, significantly
higher levels of mucosal IgA and serum IgG antibodies to AgI/II were
observed in the rCTB-conjugated group than in mice given the
unconjugated liposome preparations, although the latter mice received a
booster dose at week 9. The antibody responses in mice immunized with
rCTB-conjugated liposomes persisted at high levels for at least 6 months, at which time (week 26) a recall immunization significantly
augmented the responses. In general, mice given unconjugated liposome
preparations required one or two booster immunizations to develop a
substantial anti-AgI/II antibody response, which was more prominent in
the group given coencapsulated SBR and rCTB. These data indicate that
conjugation of rCTB to liposomes greatly enhances their effectiveness
as an antigen delivery system. This oral immunization strategy should be applicable for the development of vaccines against oral, intestinal, or sexually transmitted diseases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Induction of secretory
immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses at the mucosal surfaces (e.g., of the
gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genital tracts) is considered to be
important for protection against invasive pathogens which colonize the
mucosae and secrete harmful toxins (18). In principle,
stimulation of the common mucosal immune system by oral immunization
with soluble protein immunogens can result in IgA antibodies in various
mucosal secretions. However, not only does this require the
administration of large and repeated doses of antigen but also the
resulting antibody responses are, at best, modest and of short
duration, primarily due to the denaturation of antigens by gastric acid
or proteolysis by digestive enzymes. One strategy to help prevent the
breakdown of orally administered protein antigens involves
incorporation of vaccine proteins into particulate antigen delivery
systems, such as liposomes or biodegradable microspheres
(20). These particles may also serve as depots which prolong
the antigenic stimulation by slowly releasing encapsulated antigen.
Liposomes are bilayered phospholipid membrane vesicles that have
attracted considerable interest as mucosal delivery systems (8,
14, 21, 24, 26). Following oral administration, the portal of
liposome entry into the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) is
believed to be via the M cells of the Peyer's patches. Indeed,
liposomes have been visualized in endosomes in M cells and appear to be
transported to the underlying lymphoid tissue (1, 23).
Despite the use of this promising mucosal vaccination strategy,
effective immune responses are not always accomplished. An important
obstacle appears to be inefficient uptake by the GALT. This may be
partly due to the liposomes getting trapped in the mucous layer that
coats the mucosal surfaces and thus failing to reach the mucosal
epithelium and consequently the underlying mucosal inductive sites. In
general, liposomes may attach to cell surfaces nonspecifically, i.e.,
electrostatically or hydrophobically, or they may be modified to attach
specifically, i.e., via a surface ligand linked to the liposomal
membrane which is recognized by a cell surface receptor. For enhanced
liposome uptake and augmented mucosal IgA antibody responses, it has
been proposed that these particles should be relatively small, to
overcome the molecular barrier imposed by the M-cell glycocalyx, and
coated with a ligand the receptor of which is expressed by the M cells (7). Under these conditions, the liposome-cell interaction could lead to receptor-mediated endocytosis. However, there is little
information regarding the apical membrane molecules that might serve as
potential receptors on the M cells. Although several lectins recognize
M-cell surface molecules, lectin-targeted particulate systems may be
bound and trapped by secreted mucins (22). An alternative
ligand that is not bound by mucins is the nontoxic B subunit of cholera
toxin (CTB), which has a high affinity for the GM1
ganglioside, a glycolipid receptor present in the membrane of all
nucleated cells, including the apical membrane of the epithelial cells
in the intestine. CTB has been previously used to target soluble
protein antigens to mucosal surfaces, which results in dramatically
increased immune responses (4, 19). To take advantage of
this CTB property, we have developed a method for the chemical coupling
of CTB to liposomes and have shown that it maintains both its antigenic
and binding activities (12). This is important since
targeting of liposomes to the GALT would require that CTB maintains its
GM1 binding property. Although GM1 is not an
M-cell-specific receptor, particles coated with CTB are expected to be
taken up primarily by these cells. Indeed, even though CTB binds to all
intestinal epithelial cells, gold particles coated with CTB bind
exclusively to the M cells of the Peyer's patches (22).
This is probably because the GM1 receptor is more
accessible on the M cells than on neighboring enterocytes, which
possess a much thicker glycocalyx (7).
In this study, recombinant CTB (rCTB) was covalently coupled to the
outer surface of small unilamellar liposomes to target delivery of
incorporated antigens to Peyer's patches and enhance secretory IgA
responses. The model protein antigen encapsulated in liposomes was SBR,
which is the saliva-binding region of the AgI/II adhesin from the oral
pathogen Streptococcus mutans. Our immune response data show
that oral administration of rCTB-coated liposomes to mice induces
significantly higher mucosal immune responses to the incorporated SBR
antigen than those induced by standard liposome carriers, liposomes in
which rCTB has been encapsulated, or liposomes coadministered with
rCTB, implying that the observed immunoenhancing effect resulted from
increased uptake of the liposomes.
(This research was conducted by Evlambia Harokopakis in partial
fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. from the University of
Alabama at Birmingham.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemical reagents for liposome preparation.
Synthetic
phospholipids for liposome preparation (i.e.,
dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine [DPPE],
distearoyl-phosphatidylcholine [DSPC], and
palmitoyloleoyl-phosphatidylcholine [POPC]) and cholesterol were
obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Birmingham, Ala.). Succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate
(SMCC) and N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate
(SPDP) were purchased from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, Ill.).
Dithiothreitol, HEPES, L-lysine, and L-cysteine
were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.), and Tris was
obtained from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, N.J.). Hanks' balanced
salt solution (HBSS) was from GIBCO (Grand Island, N.Y.).
Purification of immunogens.
SBR was purified from cell
lysates of plasmid SBR-transformed Escherichia coli by using
metal chelation chromatography on a nickel-charged column (Novagen) as
previously described (13). The affinity of the SBR for
nickel arises from a six-residue histidine sequence (at its C-terminal
end) which was derived from the expression vector. rCTB was purified
from ammonium sulfate-precipitated lysates of a recombinant E. coli clone expressing a plasmid that contained the gene for CTB
(5), by using galactose affinity chromatography (27). The concentration of these recombinant protein
preparations was estimated by the bicinchoninic acid protein
determination assay (Pierce) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Liposome preparations and estimation of encapsulated or
conjugated antigens.
Liposomes with rCTB covalently attached to
their outer surface were prepared by procedures previously developed in
our lab (12). Briefly, a portion of the DPPE constituent of
the liposomes was modified by using the heterobifunctional reagent
SMCC. The reaction product, DPPE-MCC, was purified and used along with
DSPC, POPC, and cholesterol to form a lipid film on the walls of a
round-bottom glass flask. The film was hydrated with HEPES containing
265 µg of purified SBR per ml, which resulted in large multilamellar liposomes. Subsequently, small unilamellar liposomes were produced by
extruding the large multilamellar liposomes through a 400-nm-pore-size, followed by a 100-nm-pore-size, membrane. Unincorporated SBR was removed by ultracentrifugation. To conjugate rCTB to the SBR-containing liposomes, thiol groups were added to the lysine residues of the rCTB
by means of the amine-reactive reagent SPDP, resulting in rCTB-thiopropionate (rCTB-TP). The thiol groups are necessary for
reaction with the maleimide group of the DPPE-MCC constituent of the
liposomes. rCTB-TP was then reduced by using dithiothreitol, and the
reduced protein was incubated at a final concentration of 1 mg/ml with
the liposome suspension. The resulting rCTB-linked liposomes were
separated from unconjugated protein by ultracentrifugation and
resuspended in an equal volume of HBSS containing 1.5% sodium bicarbonate. Finally, a hemagglutination assay using human erythrocytes enriched with GM1 (Calbiochem-Behring, San Diego, Calif.)
was performed to confirm that rCTB was conjugated to liposomes in a
biologically active form.
Small unilamellar liposomes containing SBR, SBR plus rCTB, or buffer
only were also prepared as described above with the exception that they
were not surface modified with rCTB (unconjugated liposomes). As
expected, the unconjugated liposomes were without effect in the
hemagglutination assay. The rCTB was added at a concentration of 1.4 mg/ml during preparation of the unconjugated liposome so that the
liposomes would incorporate an amount comparable to that linked to the
surface of the conjugated liposomes (based on the estimated
encapsulation efficiency) (see Results).
The amount of liposome-bound or -encapsulated rCTB, as well as
liposome-encapsulated SBR, was determined in samples of Triton X-100-lysed liposomes with quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). For rCTB estimation, plates were coated with GM1 and developed with goat polyclonal antibodies to CT,
followed by peroxidase-conjugated rabbit polyclonal antibodies to goat IgG. For the SBR assay, rabbit anti-mouse IgG and then a mouse monoclonal IgG antibody to SBR served as the coating reagents, and
peroxidase-conjugated rabbit polyclonal antibodies to the native AgI/II
were used for detection of bound protein. A commercial CTB preparation
and purified SBR served as standards.
Immunizations.
Ten- to 12-week-old BALB/c mice, from a
pathogen-free colony, were used in the oral immunization studies, which
were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health
guidelines approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. The following groups of
five to six mice (groups A to E) were immunized intragastrically by
means of a 22-gauge feeding tube (Popper and Sons Inc., Hyde Park,
N.Y.) with the indicated preparation in 0.25 ml of HBSS containing
1.5% sodium bicarbonate: group A received liposomes containing buffer only, group B received liposomes containing the streptococcal SBR
antigen, group C received liposomes containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB, group D received liposomes containing SBR plus rCTB (i.e.,
both antigens encapsulated), and group E received liposomes containing
SBR and possessing covalently linked rCTB on their surface.
The mice received a single dose at the beginning of the experiment (day
1). A single booster immunization was given 9 weeks later to all groups
except for group E, which exhibited a high antibody response following
the primary immunization (see Results). A final booster dose was
administered to all groups at week 26. For each immunization, the
animals were fasted for 2 h before and 1 h after the peroral
administration.
Sampling and quantification of antibody responses.
Preimmune
samples of serum and secretions were obtained 1 day before immunization
(day 0). Subsequent to immunization, collections were made at weeks 3, 9, 11, 26, 28, and 31. Serum was obtained by centrifugation of blood
samples collected from the retroorbital plexus with heparinized
capillary pipettes. Saliva samples were collected by means of a
pipetter fitted with a plastic tip after stimulation of salivary flow
by intraperitoneal injection of 5 µg of carbachol (Sigma Chemical
Co.). Fecal extracts were prepared by vortexing three fecal pellets
from each mouse in 600 µl of extraction buffer (phosphate-buffered
saline containing 0.02% azide, 1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5 mM EDTA) (9). For the
vaginal washes, 50 µl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline was
inserted into and aspirated from the vagina of each mouse three times.
This procedure was performed twice for each collection.
The levels of isotype-specific antibodies in serum, saliva, fecal
extracts, and vaginal washes and total secretory IgA as well as total
vaginal IgG were determined by ELISA on microtiter plates coated with
native AgI/II (chromatographically purified from S. mutans
culture supernatants [25]), GM1 followed
by CT (List Biological Laboratories, Campell, Calif.), or goat
anti-mouse IgA or IgG. The plates were developed with the appropriate
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin isotype (IgG or
IgA) and o-phenylenediamine substrate with
H2O2. All antibodies used for ELISA were
purchased from Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc. (Birmingham,
Ala.). The concentration of specific antibodies and total
immunoglobulin in test samples was calculated by interpolation on
standard curves generated by using a mouse immunoglobulin reference
serum (ICN Biomedicals, Costa Mesa, Calif.) and constructed by a
computer program based on four-parameter logistic algorithms (SOFTmax; Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, Calif.).
Statistical analysis.
Results were evaluated by one-way
analysis of variance and the Bonferroni multiple-comparison test by
using the InStat program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.) on a
Macintosh computer. Differences were considered significant at a
P of <0.05. Antibody data were logarithmically transformed
to normalize their distribution and homogenize the variances. The data
were finally retransformed and presented as geometric means ×/
standard deviations (SD) for ease of interpretation.
 |
RESULTS |
Amount of liposome-linked rCTB and liposome-encapsulated SBR or
rCTB.
The amount of rCTB that was covalently bound to the outer
surface of the liposomes was estimated to be approximately 7 to 8% of
the quantity added (1 mg/ml of liposome suspension), which was similar
to the results in our previous report (12). Therefore, the
amount of liposome-linked rCTB given per immunization dose was 17 to 19 µg. Based on this determination, the amount of coadministered rCTB
(group C) was set at 18 µg/dose. The encapsulating efficiency of the
liposomes was about 4 to 5% of that of the added antigen (SBR or
rCTB). It was estimated that the liposomes given to groups B to E
contained 3 to 4 µg of SBR per dose and the liposomes given to group
D contained, in addition to SBR, 13 to 15 µg of rCTB per dose.
Therefore, the amount of encapsulated rCTB was roughly comparable to
that of linked or coadministered rCTB.
Serum IgG antibody responses.
Oral immunization of mice with a
single dose of liposomes containing SBR and with rCTB covalently
attached to their outer surface resulted in a strong primary serum IgG
response to native AgI/II that was significantly higher
(P < 0.001) than those induced by the other
SBR-containing liposome preparations (Fig.
1A). The response in the former group was
maintained at high levels for at least 6 months and was significantly
(P < 0.001) enhanced after a single oral boost (week
26). In contrast, low primary responses to AgI/II were induced by the
unconjugated liposome preparations, although the responses were
augmented following the booster immunizations, especially in the group
given SBR-plus-rCTB-containing liposomes. As expected, serum antibodies
to CT (Fig. 1B) were induced only by the rCTB-conjugated,
rCTB-containing, or rCTB-coadministered liposome preparations.
Preimmune serum samples as well as serum from mice given empty
liposomes did not show substantial antibody activity to either AgI/II
or to CT (<0.5 µg/ml).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Serum IgG antibody responses to native AgI/II (A) and CT
(B) in groups of mice (groups A to E) orally immunized ( ) at weeks
0, 9, and 26 with one dose of the indicated liposome (L) preparations:
group A, empty L; group B, L containing SBR (L-SBR); group C, L
containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB [(L-SBR) + rCTB]; group
D, L containing SBR plus rCTB (L-SBR/rCTB); or group E, L containing
SBR and possessing rCTB on their outer surface [(L-SBR)-rCTB]. The
last group was not boosted at week 9. Data represent geometric
means ×/ SD of five to six mice per group. For clarity, only
the upper or lower SD bars are shown.
|
|
Salivary IgA antibody responses.
A single oral immunization of
mice with the rCTB-conjugated and SBR-containing liposomes resulted in
the induction of significantly (P < 0.001) higher
levels of salivary IgA antibodies to AgI/II than those induced in the
other groups (Fig. 2A). Substantial levels of anti-AgI/II antibodies were maintained for at least 6 months
when an oral booster immunization augmented the responses to levels
similar to those of the primary response. In the other groups,
relatively low levels of salivary antibodies were induced after the
primary immunization. These responses were not significantly augmented
even after two booster doses (week 9 and 26), with the notable
exception of the group given liposomes with encapsulated SBR plus rCTB.
Salivary IgA antibodies to CT were detected in all mice receiving
rCTB-associated liposome preparations, although the primary response
was high only in mice immunized with rCTB-conjugated liposomes.
Preimmune salivary samples as well as saliva collected at later time
points from control groups contained only background antibody activity
to AgI/II or CT.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Saliva IgA antibody responses to native AgI/II (A) and
CT (B) in groups of mice (groups A to E) orally immunized ( ) at
weeks 0, 9, and 26 with one dose of the following liposome (L)
preparations: group A, empty L; group B, L containing SBR (L-SBR);
group C, L containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB [(L-SBR) + rCTB]; group D, L containing SBR plus rCTB (L-SBR/rCTB); or group E, L
containing SBR and possessing rCTB on their outer surface
[(L-SBR)-rCTB]. The last group was not boosted at week 9. Data shown
are geometric means ×/ SD of five to six mice per group. For
clarity, only the upper or lower SD bars are shown.
|
|
Vaginal secretion IgA and IgG antibody responses.
Vaginal wash
samples from mice immunized with the rCTB-conjugated and SBR-containing
liposomes demonstrated considerably higher IgA anti-AgI/II antibody
levels (P < 0.001) than the other groups 3 weeks
following a single oral immunization (Fig.
3A). Six months later, the responses
persisted at substantial levels and could be boosted with a single oral
dose. Interestingly, liposomes that carried both SBR and rCTB were the
only other preparation that could elicit vaginal anti-AgI/II antibodies
at levels significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of
the control preparation (empty liposomes), although two booster
immunizations were required. Substantial levels of antibodies to CT
were elicited in groups receiving soluble or liposome-associated rCTB
(Fig. 3B).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Vaginal IgA antibody responses to native AgI/II (A) and
CT (B) in groups of mice (groups A to E) orally immunized ( ) at
weeks 0, 9, and 26 with one dose of the following liposome (L)
preparations: group A, empty L; group B, L containing SBR (L-SBR);
group C, L containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB [(L-SBR) + rCTB]; group D, L containing SBR plus rCTB (L-SBR/rCTB); or group E, L
containing SBR and possessing rCTB on their outer surface
[(L-SBR)-rCTB]). The last group was not boosted at week 9. Results
are shown as geometric means ×/ SD of five to six mice per
group. For clarity, only the upper or lower SD bars are shown.
|
|
Of the IgG anti-SBR responses in vaginal secretions evaluated at
experimental week 31 (Fig. 4), those of
the group given SBR-carrying, rCTB-conjugated liposomes were
significantly (P < 0.001) higher. Comparable anti-CT
responses were induced in all groups given rCTB, although the group
given rCTB-conjugated liposomes received two doses in comparison to
three for the other groups (Fig. 4). The levels of total vaginal IgG
did not differ between groups.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Vaginal IgG antibody responses to AgI/II, CT, and total
vaginal IgG in groups of mice (groups A to E) orally immunized ( ) at
weeks 0, 9, and 26 with one dose of the following liposome (L)
preparations: group A, empty L; group B, L containing SBR (L-SBR);
group C, L containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB [(L-SBR) + rCTB]; group D, L containing SBR plus rCTB (L-SBR/rCTB); or group E, L
containing SBR and possessing rCTB on their outer surface
[(L-SBR)-rCTB]). The last group was not boosted at week 9. Data are
represented as geometric means ×/ SD of five to six mice per
group. For clarity, only the upper SD bars are shown.
|
|
IgG/IgA antibody ratios in serum and vaginal secretions.
In an
attempt to address the issue of possible contribution of plasma-derived
immunoglobulins to responses in the genital tract secretions, the mean
IgG/IgA ratios of anti-AgI/II and anti-CT antibody responses in serum
and in vaginal washes were determined. Calculations were performed only
for the group given rCTB-conjugated, SBR-containing liposomes, which
exhibited high serum and vaginal antibody responses. For both
anti-AgI/II and anti-CT responses, the IgG/IgA ratio was about 100 times higher in serum than in vaginal washes. Specifically, for
anti-AgI/II responses, the IgG/IgA ratio was 62.2 ± 52.6 in serum
as compared to 0.57 ± 0.54 in vaginal secretions
(P < 0.05), while for anti-CT responses, the
respective ratios were 13.9 ± 6.55 and 0.13 ± 0.08 (P < 0.05). These data suggest that a considerable
amount of vaginal IgA must have been produced locally rather than
transported to the vaginal secretion by transduction.
Intestinal IgA antibody responses.
IgA anti-AgI/II responses
were also detected in fecal extracts from the intragastrically
immunized mice. Following the primary immunization, significantly
higher (P < 0.05) anti-AgI/II immune responses were
detected in mice immunized with rCTB-conjugated and SBR-containing
liposomes than in other groups, with the exception of the group which
received liposomes containing SBR plus rCTB (Fig.
5A). After the booster immunizations
(especially the second one at week 26), IgA anti-AgI/II responses were
elevated only in mice receiving rCTB-conjugated or rCTB-containing
liposomes. Fecal antibodies to CT were induced in all mice receiving
soluble or liposome-associated rCTB (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Intestinal IgA antibody responses to AgI/II (A) and CT
(B) in groups of mice (groups A to E) orally immunized ( ) at weeks
0, 9, and 26 with one dose of the following liposome (L) preparations:
group A, empty L; group B, L containing SBR (L-SBR); group C, L
containing SBR and coadministered with rCTB [(L-SBR) + rCTB]; group
D, L containing SBR plus rCTB (L-SBR/rCTB); or group E, L containing
SBR and possessing rCTB on their outer surface [(L-SBR)-rCTB]). The
last group was not boosted at week 9. Data points represent geometric
means ×/ SD of five to six mice per group. For clarity, only
the upper or lower SD bars are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results indicate that liposomes can be used as effective oral
antigen delivery systems when rCTB is covalently attached to their
outer surface. High levels of mucosal IgA antibodies against the
incorporated SBR antigen were induced after a single oral immunization
of rCTB-conjugated liposomes, whereas plain liposomes or other liposome
formulations in which rCTB was either encapsulated or simply mixed with
these vesicles were significantly less effective despite the use of
multiple doses.
Access to and entrance through the M cells overlying the GALT appears
to be a desirable feature for mucosal vaccines, and CTB may constitute
an effective means for targeting vaccine particles to the GALT. Such a
strategy, however, would require that CTB is attached to the particles
in a biologically active form, so that it maintains its GM1
ganglioside binding ability. The coupling strategy used in our
experiments preserves this important feature since liposome-bound rCTB
was capable of agglutinating GM1-enriched erythrocytes.
Another important consideration is how accessible the GM1
receptor on the surface of the M cells is to the vaccine particles.
Elegant histological studies have shown that the glycocalyx which coats
the M cells, although thinner than that of the neighboring enterocytes,
can still be an obstacle when trying to target particles to their cell
surface (7). Indeed, these investigators demonstrated that
particles 1 µm or larger coated with CTB could not adhere to M cells,
unlike smaller CTB-coated particles which could readily bind. The size
of our liposomes is restricted to around 100 nm as shown by electron
microscopy (12). Another design parameter, which was
considered important for enhancing the binding interactions of the
rCTB-linked liposomes, involved the use of heterobifunctional linkers
which would form a long spacer between rCTB and the surface of the
liposomes (15). This would further reduce steric hindrance and allow the liposome-linked rCTB molecule to contact its receptor on
the M cell. The rCTB-conjugated liposomes were thus expected to gain
access to the GALT, and the observed mucosal IgA responses are
consistent with efficient liposome uptake.
Once in the GALT, liposomes can be taken up by antigen-presenting
cells, resulting in delivery of the immunogen in a concentrated form to
these cells. An interesting speculation is that antigen uptake and
subsequent processing within the GALT may be enhanced by an interaction
between liposomal rCTB and GM1 on macrophages acting as
antigen-presenting cells. These possible properties of the
rCTB-conjugated liposomes may account for the adequacy of a single oral
dose in generating strong IgA mucosal immune responses to the
liposome-incorporated SBR antigen. For example, 3 weeks following a
primary single-dose oral immunization, anti-SBR responses in saliva
were about 7% of the total IgA and persisted at substantial levels for
at least 6 months.
In contrast to rCTB-conjugated SBR-carrying liposomes, the other
experimental liposome preparations required one or two booster immunizations to induce anti-SBR responses at levels higher than the
background. These liposomes probably rely only on nonspecific hydrophobic interactions for transport into the inductive sites of the
intestinal immune system (7, 8), and thus administration of
repeated doses is required for induction of antibody responses. Coadministration of rCTB with SBR-containing liposomes did not result
in any immunoenhancing effect. This finding was consistent with
previous reports in which commercial CTB or rCTB did not act as an
adjuvant for oral immunization when coadministered with immunogens
(3, 16). However, when rCTB was coencapsulated with SBR in
liposomes, serum and mucosal anti-SBR responses were occasionally
higher than those induced by the liposomes containing only SBR. It is
possible that rCTB can act as a mucosal adjuvant when it is delivered
to the GALT with the target immunogen within a vehicle. In this regard,
we previously found that anti-SBR responses were higher after
immunization with an attenuated Salmonella typhimurium vector coexpressing SBR and CTB than after immunization with a similar
clone expressing SBR alone. Immunomodulating functions reported for
rCTB, such as enhancement of antigen presentation by macrophages
(17) and induction of class II major histocompatibility antigens on B cells (6), may not only contribute to its
strong immunogenicity but, since they are antigen nonspecific, may also enhance immune responses to other antigens that happen to be in the
same microenvironment with CTB.
The SBR is the adherence domain of AgI/II, a major adhesin implicated
in the initial adherence of S. mutans to the salivary pellicle-coated tooth surfaces (2, 10). Recently, we have shown that intranasal immunization with a soluble chimeric protein consisting of the SBR and the A2 and B subunits of CT protects against
experimental S. mutans-induced dental caries
(11). The rCTB-conjugated liposome strategy induces a higher
salivary IgA anti-SBR response than the soluble SBR-CTA2/B chimeric
protein does (9), and thus it is similarly expected to
confer protection against S. mutans-induced caries.
Moreover, the ability of rCTB-conjugated liposomes to induce high
levels of specific antibodies in the genital tract after a single oral
immunization (specific IgA responses in the vaginal secretions were
about 5% of the total IgA) is an important finding since it suggests
that this oral vaccination strategy may find application in the
prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Both IgA and IgG
antibodies were detected in vaginal secretions, and our results
indicate that a significant portion of the IgA antibodies must have
been produced locally since the IgG/IgA ratio did not reflect that of
the serum.
The impressive systemic and mucosal immune responses generated by a
single oral dose of antigen encapsulated in rCTB-conjugated liposomes
indicate that targeting of nonliving microparticulate vaccine vectors
to GALT via rCTB may be a promising way of circumventing problems
associated with oral immunization. The high efficiency of this
nonliving vaccine delivery system may be preferred over that of
attenuated recombinant bacterial or viral vectors for safety reasons as
well as to avoid stimulation of the immune system in response to
unrelated antigens carried by the vector.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Michael W. Russell for his critical assessment of the
manuscript and Vickie Barron for secretarial assistance.
These studies were supported by U.S. Public Health Service grants DE
09081, DE 08182, AI 33544, and K16DE 00279 and grants from the World
Health Organization.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: The University
of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Microbiology, 845 19th St.
South, BBRB 258/5, Birmingham, AL 35294-2170. Phone: (205) 934-3470. Fax: (205) 934-1426. E-mail:
sue_michalek{at}micro.microbio.uab.edu.
Editor:
R. N. Moore
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Childers, N. K.,
F. Denys,
N. F. McGee, and S. M. Michalek.
1990.
Ultrastructural study of liposome uptake by M cells of rat Peyer's patches: an oral vaccine system for delivery of purified antigen.
Reg. Immunol.
3:8-16[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Crowley, P. J.,
L. J. Brady,
D. A. Piacentini, and A. S. Bleiweis.
1993.
Identification of a salivary agglutinin-binding domain within cell surface adhesin P1 of Streptococcus mutans.
Infect. Immun.
61:1547-1552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Czerkinsky, C.,
M. W. Russell,
N. Lycke,
M. Lindblad, and J. Holmgren.
1989.
Oral administration of a streptococcal antigen coupled to cholera toxin B subunit evokes strong antibody responses in salivary glands and extramucosal tissues.
Infect. Immun.
57:1072-1077[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Czerkinsky, C.,
J. B. Sun,
M. Lebens,
B. L. Li,
C. Rask,
M. Lindblad, and J. Holmgren.
1996.
Cholera toxin B subunit as transmucosal carrier-delivery and immunomodulating system for induction of antiinfectious and antipathological immunity.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
778:185-193[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Dertzbaugh, M. T., and C. O. Elson.
1993.
Reduction in oral immunogenicity of cholera toxin B subunit by N-terminal peptide addition.
Infect. Immun.
61:384-390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Francis, M. L.,
J. Ryan,
M. G. Jobling,
R. K. Holmes,
J. Moss, and J. J. Mond.
1992.
Cyclic AMP-independent effects of cholera toxin on B cell activation. II. Binding of ganglioside GM1 induces B cell activation.
J. Immunol.
148:1999-2005[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Frey, A.,
K. T. Giannasca,
R. Weltzin,
P. J. Giannasca,
H. Reggio,
W. I. Lencer, and M. R. Neutra.
1996.
Role of the glycocalyx in regulating access of microparticles to apical plasma membranes of intestinal epithelial cells: implications for microbial attachment and oral vaccine targeting.
J. Exp. Med.
184:1045-1059[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Gregoriadis, G.
1990.
Immunological adjuvants: a role for liposomes.
Immunol. Today
11:89-97[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hajishengallis, G.,
S. K. Hollingshead,
T. Koga, and M. W. Russell.
1995.
Mucosal immunization with a bacterial protein antigen genetically coupled to cholera toxin A2/B subunits.
J. Immunol.
154:4322-4332[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Hajishengallis, G.,
T. Koga, and M. W. Russell.
1994.
Affinity and specificity of the interactions between Streptococcus mutans antigen I/II and salivary components.
J. Dent. Res.
73:1493-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Hajishengallis, G.,
M. W. Russell, and S. M. Michalek.
1998.
Comparison of an adherence domain and a structural region of Streptococcus mutans antigen I/II in protective immunity against dental caries in rats after intranasal immunization.
Infect. Immun.
66:1740-1743[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Harokopakis, E.,
N. K. Childers,
S. M. Michalek,
S. S. Zhang, and M. Tomasi.
1995.
Conjugation of cholera toxin or its B subunit to liposomes for targeted delivery of antigens.
J. Immunol. Methods
185:31-42[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Harokopakis, E.,
G. Hajishengallis,
T. Greenway,
M. W. Russell, and S. M. Michalek.
1997.
Mucosal immunogenicity of a Salmonella typhimurium-cloned heterologous antigen in the absence or presence of co-expressed cholera toxin A2/B subunits.
Infect. Immun.
65:1445-1454[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Jackson, S.,
J. Mestecky,
N. K. Childers, and S. M. Michalek.
1990.
Liposomes containing anti-idiotypic antibodies: an oral vaccine to induce protective secretory immune responses specific for pathogens of mucosal surfaces.
Infect. Immun.
58:1932-1936[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Loughrey, H. C.,
L. S. Choi,
P. R. Cullis, and M. B. Bally.
1990.
Optimized procedures for the coupling of proteins to liposomes.
J. Immunol. Methods
132:25-35[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Lycke, N.,
T. Tsuji, and J. Holmgren.
1992.
The adjuvant effect of Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins is linked to their ADP-ribosyltransferase activity.
Eur. J. Immunol.
22:2277-2281[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Matousek, M. P.,
J. G. Nedrud, and C. V. Harding.
1996.
Distinct effects of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit and holotoxin on different stages of class II MHC antigen processing and presentation by macrophages.
J. Immunol.
156:4137-4145[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
McGhee, J. R., and J. Mestecky.
1990.
In defense of mucosal surfaces. Development of novel vaccines for IgA responses at the portals of entry of microbial pathogens.
Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.
4:315-341[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
McKenzie, S. J., and J. F. Halsey.
1984.
Cholera toxin B subunit as a carrier protein to stimulate a mucosal immune response.
J. Immunol.
133:1818-1824[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Michalek, S. M.,
N. K. Childers, and M. T. Dertzbaugh.
1995.
Vaccination strategies for mucosal pathogens, p. 269-301.
In
J. A. Roth, C. A. Bolin, K. A. Brogden, F. C. Minion, and M. J. Wannemuehler (ed.), Virulence mechanisms of bacterial pathogens, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 21.
|
Michalek, S. M.,
N. K. Childers,
J. Katz,
M. Dertzbaugh,
S. Zhang,
M. W. Russell,
F. L. Macrina,
S. Jackson, and J. Mestecky.
1992.
Liposomes and conjugate vaccines for antigen delivery and induction of mucosal immune responses.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
327:191-198[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Neutra, M. R., and J.-P. Kraehenbuhl.
1996.
Antigen uptake by M cells for effective mucosal vaccines, p. 41-55.
In
H. Kiyono, P. L. Ogra, and J. R. McGhee (ed.), Mucosal vaccines. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 23.
|
Pappo, J., and T. H. Ermak.
1989.
Uptake and translocation of fluorescent latex particles by rabbit Peyer's patch follicle epithelium: a quantitative model for M cell uptake.
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
76:144-148[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Richards, R. L.,
G. M. Swartz, Jr.,
C. Schultz,
M. D. Hayre,
G. S. Ward,
W. R. Ballou,
J. D. Chulay,
W. T. Hockmeyer,
S. L. Berman, and C. R. Alving.
1989.
Immunogenicity of liposomal malaria sporozoite antigen in monkeys: adjuvant effects of aluminium hydroxide and non-pyrogenic liposomal lipid A.
Vaccine
7:506-512[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Russell, M. W.,
L. A. Bergmeier,
E. D. Zanders, and T. Lehner.
1980.
Protein antigens of Streptococcus mutans: purification and properties of a double antigen and its protease-resistant component.
Infect. Immun.
28:486-493[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Wachsmann, D.,
J. P. Klein,
M. Scholler, and R. M. Frank.
1985.
Local and systemic immune response to orally administered liposome-associated soluble S. mutans cell wall antigens.
Immunology
54:189-193[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Wu, H.-Y., and M. W. Russell.
1998.
Induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses by intranasal immunization using recombinant cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant.
Vaccine
16:286-292[Medline].
|
Infection and Immunity, September 1998, p. 4299-4304, Vol. 66, No. 9
0019-9567/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Krishnan, L., Sad, S., Patel, G. B., Sprott, G. D.
(2003). Archaeosomes Induce Enhanced Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Responses to Entrapped Soluble Protein in the Absence of Interleukin 12 and Protect against Tumor Challenge. Cancer Res.
63: 2526-2534
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martin, M., Sharpe, A., Clements, J. D., Michalek, S. M.
(2002). Role of B7 Costimulatory Molecules in the Adjuvant Activity of the Heat-Labile Enterotoxin of Escherichiacoli. J. Immunol.
169: 1744-1752
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barackman, J. D., Ott, G., Pine, S., O'Hagan, D. T.
(2001). Oral Administration of Influenza Vaccine in Combination with the Adjuvants LT-K63 and LT-R72 Induces Potent Immune Responses Comparable to or Stronger than Traditional Intramuscular Immunization. CVI
8: 652-657
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krishnan, L., Sad, S., Patel, G. B., Sprott, G. D.
(2001). The Potent Adjuvant Activity of Archaeosomes Correlates to the Recruitment and Activation of Macrophages and Dendritic Cells In Vivo. J. Immunol.
166: 1885-1893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martin, M., Hajishengallis, G., Metzger, D. J., Michalek, S. M., Connell, T. D., Russell, M. W.
(2001). Recombinant Antigen-Enterotoxin A2/B Chimeric Mucosal Immunogens Differentially Enhance Antibody Responses and B7-Dependent Costimulation of CD4+ T Cells. Infect. Immun.
69: 252-261
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krishnan, L., Sad, S., Patel, G. B., Sprott, G. D.
(2000). Archaeosomes Induce Long-Term CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cell Response to Entrapped Soluble Protein by the Exogenous Cytosolic Pathway, in the Absence of CD4+ T Cell Help. J. Immunol.
165: 5177-5185
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brady, L. J., van Tilburg, M. L. J. A., Alford, C. E., McArthur, W. P.
(2000). Monoclonal Antibody-Mediated Modulation of the Humoral Immune Response against Mucosally Applied Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun.
68: 1796-1805
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Krishnan, L., Dicaire, C. J., Patel, G. B., Sprott, G. D.
(2000). Archaeosome Vaccine Adjuvants Induce Strong Humoral, Cell-Mediated, and Memory Responses: Comparison to Conventional Liposomes and Alum. Infect. Immun.
68: 54-63
[Abstract]
[Full Text]