Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, January 1999, p. 102-107, Vol. 67, No. 1
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Surface Proteins of Anaplasma
marginale Grown in Tick Cell Culture, Tick Salivary Glands,
and Cattle
A. F.
Barbet,1,*
R.
Blentlinger,1
Jooyoung
Yi,1
A. M.
Lundgren,1
E. F.
Blouin,2 and
K.
M.
Kocan2
Department of Pathobiology, College of
Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida,1 and
Department of Anatomy,
Pathology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma2
Received 15 May 1998/Returned for modification 24 July
1998/Accepted 1 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Anaplasma marginale, a tick-borne rickettsial pathogen
of cattle, infects bovine erythrocytes, resulting in mild to severe hemolytic disease that causes economic losses in domestic livestock worldwide. Recently, the Virginia isolate of A. marginale
was propagated in a continuous tick cell line, IDE8, derived from embryonic Ixodes scapularis. Development of A. marginale in cell culture was morphologically similar to that
described previously in ticks. In order to evaluate the potential of
the cell culture-derived organisms for use in future research or as an
antigen for serologic tests and vaccines, the extent of structural
conservation of the major surface proteins (MSPs) between the cell
culture-derived A. marginale and the bovine erythrocytic
stage, currently the source of A. marginale antigen, was
determined. Structural conservation on the tick salivary-gland stage
was also examined. Monoclonal and monospecific antisera against MSPs 1 through 5, initially characterized against erythrocyte stages, also
reacted with A. marginale from cell culture and tick
salivary glands. MSP1a among geographic A. marginale
isolates is variable in size because of different numbers of a tandemly
repeated 28- or 29-amino-acid peptide. The cell culture-derived
A. marginale maintained the same-size MSP1a as that found
on the Virginia isolate of A. marginale in bovine
erythrocytes and tick salivary glands. Although differences were
observed in the polymorphic MSP2 antigen between culture and
salivary-gland stages, MSP2 did not appear to vary, by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, during continuous passage in culture. These data
show that MSPs of erythrocyte-stage A. marginale are
present on culture stages and may be structurally conserved during
continuous culture. The presence of all current candidate diagnostic
and vaccine antigens suggests that in vitro cultures are a valuable source of rickettsiae for basic research and for the development of
improved diagnostic reagents and vaccines against anaplasmosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease
of cattle caused by the rickettsia Anaplasma marginale.
Following transmission to cattle, animals develop an intraerythrocytic
rickettsemia accompanied by severe anemia, weight loss, abortion, and
sometimes death (1). Recovered cattle maintain low to
undetectable levels of infection and become carriers of the disease,
thus acting as reservoirs of infection for transmission to other
animals (32). The disease is devastating to the production,
movement, and utilization of cattle worldwide, including many areas of
the United States (17).
Control measures for anaplasmosis have included various combinations of
vector control, vaccination, and administration of antibiotics for
treatment or disease prevention. Each method has associated drawbacks
which have limited their use, and consequently, severe losses continue
(24). Vaccination with live or killed organisms has been
practiced for more than 75 years but has relied on infected bovine
erythrocytes as a source of A. marginale antigen. Blood-derived vaccines have been expensive due to requirements for
disease-free cattle and the difficulty of purifying A. marginale from erythrocyte components to avoid induction of
isoantibodies (9). In addition, vaccine failures have been
reported on heterologous challenge with various geographic isolates
(24).
In bovine erythrocytes, A. marginale occurs within small
membrane-bound inclusions containing four to six rickettsiae. In contrast, large colonies that contain many organisms develop in naturally infected ticks. A developmental cycle begins in midgut cells,
with subsequent infection of a variety of tick tissues including the
salivary glands, from where the rickettsiae are transmitted to cattle.
Within each site of development in ticks, A. marginale
undergoes a development cycle involving two stages. A reticulated or
vegetative form that divides by binary fission is observed first within
the colonies and subsequently changes into the infective dense form
(14-16).
Recently, A. marginale has been grown in continuous culture
in a cell line, IDE8, derived from embryos of the tick Ixodes scapularis (20). The culture-derived A. marginale remained infective for ticks and cattle after 3 years of
continuous passage in the IDE8 cells. Colonies of A. marginale in tick cell culture were morphologically similar to
those observed in ticks (8, 20). A. marginale
electron-dense forms in the inoculum adhered to and infected cultured
tick cells and transformed into reticulated forms that divided by
binary fission. After formation of large colonies of organisms, the
rickettsiae transformed into the dense form, which was released and was
infective for other cells. Because the cell culture-derived A. marginale organisms were morphologically similar to organisms in
naturally infected ticks, it was important to determine which surface
antigens, if any, were conserved among the cell culture-, bovine
erythrocyte-, and tick salivary-gland-derived A. marginale
organisms in order to evaluate the potential of using cultured A. marginale for future research and for development of improved
vaccines and diagnostic tests.
Surface antigens major surface protein 1 (MSP1) through MSP5 of
erythrocytic-stage A. marginale have been extensively
characterized in recent years, and the gene sequences, recombinant
protein analogs, monospecific and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs),
information on isolate variability, and potential value in diagnostic
assays and vaccines are available (3-6, 10, 13, 18, 21, 22, 25,
28, 31, 34). A previous investigation suggested that antibodies
against A. marginale from midgut of the tick
Dermacentor andersoni recognize MSP1, MSP2, and MSP3
of erythrocyte-stage A. marginale, indicating that
some epitopes are shared (29). MSP5 is present on both
tick salivary-gland and bovine erythrocyte stages of A. marginale (13). In this study, we directly compared MSP1 through MSP5 of the erythrocyte stage with homologous proteins present on cell culture- and tick salivary-gland-derived A. marginale.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sources of rickettsiae. (i) Cell culture-derived A. marginale.
The Virginia isolate of A. marginale was
cultivated in the IDE8 cell line isolated from embryonated eggs of
I. scapularis, as described previously (20).
Cultures infected with A. marginale and containing >90%
infected cells were harvested and frozen at
70°C in
phosphate-buffered saline. Thawed cultures were solubilized in sample
buffer for gel analysis. Uninfected IDE8 cells were processed similarly
and used as negative controls in immunoblots.
(ii) Erythrocyte-derived A. marginale.
Erythrocytic
A. marginale organisms (Florida and Virginia isolates) were
purified from blood (30) collected at ascending or peak
rickettsemia in a splenectomized calf that was experimentally infected
with cryopreserved A. marginale.
(iii) Tick salivary-gland-derived A. marginale.
Infected tick salivary glands were collected from male D. andersoni ticks that were infected with the Virginia isolate of A. marginale as adults as described previously (15,
16). Tick salivary glands were dissected from infected ticks that
were allowed to feed on susceptible calves in order to cause
development of A. marginale in tick salivary glands.
Salivary-gland infections were confirmed by electron microscopy and by
use of an Anaplasma-specific DNA probe. Infected glands were
stored at
70°C in phosphate-buffered saline until they were thawed
and solubilized in sample buffer for gel electrophoresis. Uninfected
salivary glands were dissected from uninfected, fed ticks and processed
in a similar manner as the infected ones and used as negative controls
in immunoblots.
MAbs and polyclonal sera.
MAb 22B1 (anti-MSP1a
[26]), rabbit 874 (monospecific antibody to
affinity-purified MSP1 [7]), rabbit 883 and 884 (monospecific antibodies to affinity-purified MSP2
[31]), rabbit 955 (monospecific antibody to
affinity-purified MSP3 [19]), MAb 75C2 (anti-MSP3 [19]), rabbit C (monospecific antibody to
affinity-purified MSP4 [22]), MAb ANAF16C1 (anti-MSP5
[13]), and rabbit 821 (antibody to purified
erythrocytic-stage A. marginale [30]) were
all prepared previously during characterization of MSPs of bovine
erythrocyte-stage A. marginale. All these antibodies were prepared against MSPs of the Florida isolate of A. marginale. Antiserum was also prepared from a spleen-intact cow
infected with a cryopreserved blood stabilate of the Virginia isolate
of A. marginale (PA188). Negative control antibodies
included normal rabbit serum and preimmune serum, normal bovine serum,
and MAbs Tryp2B1 and Tryp1E1 with specificity for a variable surface
glycoprotein of Trypanosoma brucei.
Protein analysis.
A. marginale-infected tick cells
from in vitro culture or salivary glands, partially purified
erythrocytic-stage rickettsiae, or the respective uninfected control
preparations were solubilized in sample buffer for one (2% sodium
dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 25 mM Tris [pH
6.8], 15% glycerol, 0.002% bromophenol blue)- or two (9 M urea, 1%
Triton X-100, 2.5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.8% 5/7 ampholyte, 0.2% 3/10
ampholyte)-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteins were separated on
7.5 to 17.5% polyacrylamide-SDS slab gels (one dimension) or on
isoelectrofocusing tube gels followed by 7.5 to 17.5%
polyacrylamide-SDS slab gels (two dimensions [2]) and
immunoblotted to nitrocellulose. Nitrocellulose membranes were reacted
with the above-described primary antisera, and reactive proteins were
visualized by reaction with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated protein G
and SuperSignal or SuperSignal Ultra substrate (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.)
or alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody and CDP-Star
substrate (Tropix, Bedford, Mass.) and chemiluminescence as described
by the manufacturers.
 |
RESULTS |
Initial immunoblots suggested that MSPs previously identified and
characterized on erythrocyte-stage A. marginale were also present on A. marginale cultured in vitro. In Fig.
1, a positive reaction was obtained on
cultured A. marginale with specific antibodies against
MSP1a, MSP2, and MSP5 and also with an antiserum raised against
purified erythrocyte-stage rickettsiae. No reactivity was observed with
negative control antibodies or with MSP-specific antibodies against the
uninfected tick cell line. Subsequently, the presence of each MSP was
examined in more detail.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Antibodies to A. marginale erythrocyte-stage
surface proteins react with A. marginale grown in vitro in
tick cell culture. Proteins of A. marginale-infected (A) or
uninfected (B) tick cells were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, blotted to nitrocellulose membranes, and reacted with
specific antibodies, and reactions were visualized by
chemiluminescence. Antibodies are as follows: anti-MSP1a, R874
(1:4,000) and MAb 22B1 (10 µg/ml); anti-MSP2, R883 (1:10,000) and
R884 (1:10,000); anti-MSP5, MAb F16C1 (10 µg/ml); anti-purified
erythrocyte-stage A. marginale (A.m.), R821 (1:10,000);
negative antibody (Ab) controls, Tryp2B1 (10 µg/ml), Tryp1E1 (10 µg/ml), and normal rabbit serum (1:4,000). Numbers to the right of
each panel indicate molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|
MSP1 has been shown previously to confer partial protection on
immunized animals against A. marginale challenge and to
contain an epitope recognized by MAbs capable of in vitro
neutralization of isolated rickettsiae (25, 26). This
epitope is present on the MSP1a component of a dimeric complex of MSP1a
and MSP1b (7, 33). The reaction of MAb 22B1, which
recognizes this neutralization-sensitive epitope of MSP1a, is shown in
Fig. 2. MSP1a of the Virginia isolate
(erythrocyte stage) of A. marginale has an apparent
molecular weight of 70,000 compared to 105,000 for MSP1a of the Florida
isolate (erythrocyte stage) of A. marginale (Fig. 2A),
agreeing with previous data. MSP1a is present on the in vitro-cultured
Virginia isolate of A. marginale and is the same apparent
size as MSP1a of Virginia erythrocyte stages (Fig. 2B). MSP1a of the
same size is also present on Virginia isolate salivary-gland stages
(Fig. 2C). Thus, despite the considerable variation in
erythrocyte-stage MSP1a known to occur between geographic isolates of
A. marginale (23), no size variation was observed between the different stages of a single isolate or on the same isolate
of A. marginale grown in culture.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Antibody to MSP1a detects a 70,000-molecular-weight band
in the Virginia isolate of A. marginale from erythrocytes,
tick salivary glands, and in vitro culture but a
105,000-molecular-weight band in the Florida isolate of A. marginale. A. marginale organisms purified from infected bovine
erythrocytes (er.) or total proteins of infected tick cell cultures
(t.c.) or infected (inf.) or uninfected (uninf.) salivary glands of
D. andersoni (s.g.) were separated and blotted with
anti-MSP1a (MAb 22B1) or negative control (Tryp1E1) antibody. The
figure shows a comparison of MSP1a in Florida and Virginia erythrocyte
stages (A), in Virginia erythrocyte and cultured stages (B), and in
Virginia cultured and salivary-gland stages (C). Numbers at right
indicate molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|
MSP2 and MSP3 are the dominant polypeptides recognized on immunoblots
by diluted sera from cattle infected with A. marginale (2, 27) (see also Fig. 4). Figures
3 and 4
show that MSP2- and MSP3-related polypeptides are present in
erythrocyte, salivary-gland, and cultured stages of A. marginale. As in erythrocyte stages (2), MSP2 and MSP3
polypeptides appear to be the major polypeptide antigens in cultured
and in salivary-gland stages recognized by sera from infected cattle
(Fig. 4). The same two-dimensional blot pattern was obtained for MSP2
and MSP3 polypeptides no matter whether A. marginale was
examined after 9, 13, 17, or 21 passages in culture (Fig.
5). However, this two-dimensional pattern
was different from that of A. marginale in D. andersoni salivary glands (Fig. 6),
where greater diversity in MSP2 polypeptide spots was observed.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Antibody to MSP2 detects a 36,000-molecular-weight band
in Florida and Virginia-isolate, erythrocyte-stage (er.) A. marginale and in A. marginale from tick salivary glands
(s.g.) or grown in vitro (t.c.). Antibodies are as follows: anti-MSP2,
R883 (1:10,000); control, normal rabbit serum (1:10,000). Numbers at
right indicate molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
MSP2 and MSP3 are the major polypeptides recognized by
bovine infection serum in A. marginale from bovine
erythrocytes, tick salivary glands, and in vitro culture. (A) Virginia
isolate, erythrocyte-stage A. marginale proteins were
separated and reacted with a bovine infection serum (PA188, 1:300),
specific antibodies to MSPs, or control antibodies. (B) PA188 (1:300)
was reacted with separated proteins derived from Florida or Virginia
isolate, erythrocyte-stage A. marginale (er.) or with
infected or uninfected (unif.) tick salivary glands (s.g.) and in vitro
cultures (t.c.). (C) As for panel B, except that the dilution of PA188
is 1:1,000. Antibodies are as follows: bovine infection serum PA188,
anti-MSP2 R883 (1:10,000), anti-MSP3 R955 (1:10,000), control normal
rabbit serum (1:10,000), anti-MSP1a MAb 22B1 (2 µg/ml), anti-MSP3 MAb
75C2 (2 µg/ml), and control MAb Tryp1E1 (2 µg/ml). Numbers at left
indicate molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Conservation of MSP2 and MSP3 polypeptides in A. marginale grown in culture for varying times. Two-dimensional
electrophoresis and immunoblotting with bovine infection serum PA188
(1:300) of A. marginale analyzed after passage 9 (30 January
1995) (A), passage 13 (6 June 1996) (B), passage 17 (13 November 1996)
(C), and passage 21 (24 January 1997) (D). The migration positions of
molecular weight standards (lysozyme, 14,300; trypsin inhibitor,
21,500; carbonic anhydrase, 30,000; ovalbumin, 46,000; bovine serum
albumin, 66,000; phosphorylase b, 97,400; and myosin,
220,000) are shown on the left of each panel, and positions of
isoelectric point standards (conalbumin, 6.3; carbonic anhydrase, 5.9;
bovine serum albumin, 5.5; actin, 5.1; and trypsin inhibitor, 4.5) are
shown at the bottom of each panel.
|
|

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Diversity in MSP2 and MSP3 polypeptides in A. marginale (A.m.) from salivary glands of D. andersoni
(D.a.). Two-dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting of infected
tick salivary glands with bovine infection serum PA188 (1:300) are
shown. The migration positions of standards are illustrated as
described for Fig. 5.
|
|
MSP4 and MSP5 are conserved proteins of 31,000 and 19,000 in apparent
molecular weight, respectively, found in erythrocyte stages of all
isolates of A. marginale examined (22, 34). MSP4
and MSP5 are also present in all stages examined of A. marginale, including cultured organisms (Fig.
7 and 8).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Antibody to MSP4 detects a 31,000-molecular-weight band
in A. marginale (A.m.)-infected but not in uninfected tick
cells grown in vitro. Proteins were separated, blotted as described for
Fig. 1, and reacted with anti-MSP4 antibody (rabbit C; 1:1,000) or
preimmune serum (1:1,000), and reactions were visualized by
chemiluminescence. Numbers to the right of each panel indicate
molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Antibody to MSP5 detects a 19,000-molecular-weight band
in Florida and Virginia-isolate, erythrocyte-stage (er.) A. marginale and in A. marginale from tick salivary glands
(s.g.) or grown in vitro (t.c.). Antibodies are anti-MSP5 MAb F16C1 (10 µg/ml) (A) and control Tryp1E1 (10 µg/ml) (B). Numbers at right
indicate molecular mass in kilodaltons.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
All MSPs previously identified and characterized on
erythrocyte-derived A. marginale were also found to be
present on organisms grown in the IDE8 cultured tick cells. MSP1, MSP2,
MSP4, and MSP5 show potential value in the development of
serodiagnostic tests and vaccines for anaplasmosis. MSP1a varies in
size in different geographic isolates of A. marginale, but a
neutralization-sensitive epitope is conserved (23).
Sequencing of the MSP1a gene of different isolates and characterization
of this epitope with synthetic peptides showed that the
neutralization-sensitive epitope was located on a tandem 28- or
29-amino-acid repeat in MSP1a. The number of tandem repeats varied
between isolates of A. marginale, two being present in a
Virginia isolate and eight being present in a Florida isolate (4). The lack of size variation between MSP1a of erythrocyte stages and that of cultured stages of the Virginia isolate suggested that gross isolate identity was maintained in the cultured rickettsiae.
Variation in MSP2 and MSP3 has also been observed previously in
erythrocyte stages of A. marginale. Both polypeptides are encoded by polymorphic, multigene families (3, 28), and
although sometimes visualized as single bands at around 36,000 (MSP2)
or 90,000 (MSP3) in molecular weight on single-dimension gels, each can
be resolved into multiple spots on two-dimensional gels (2). There is evidence that MSP2 is a protective antigen (31) but also that both MSP2 and MSP3 may be involved in antigenic or strain variation of A. marginale (2, 10, 11). More than
three antigenic types of MSP2 were present in one rickettsemia cycle in
A. marginale prepared from infected carrier cattle
(11). Different antigenic types of MSP2 and MSP3 have been
distinguished previously by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
immunoblotting (2, 10). Our two-dimensional blots of
A. marginale cultured for varying times revealed no
structural variation in MSP2 or MSP3 polypeptides, suggesting that
antigenic stability may be maintained in culture. This was not the case
when A. marginale was passaged through ticks, where the
expressed MSP2 polypeptides appeared to be those found in culture in
addition to others of similar size but different pI. Diverse structural
types of MSP2 may be expressed in salivary glands before rickettsiae
enter the mammalian host. Further confirmation of antigen stability in
culture and diversity on passage between culture and different hosts
will be required with different cultured isolates of A. marginale, since at this time only one isolate (Virginia) has been cultured.
MSP4 and MSP5 are also present on cultured A. marginale.
MSP4 has some sequence homology with MSP2 polypeptides and therefore may be considered a related member of this protein family
(28). MSP4 appears to be conserved and is expressed by all
isolates tested (22). MSP5 is encoded by a single gene copy
and is also conserved between different isolates. Infected cattle
commonly develop antibodies to MSP5. The reaction between MAb F16C1 and recombinant MSP5 was inhibited by 34 of 35 known positive cattle serum
samples, by sera from cattle infected up to 6 years previously, and not
by sera from anaplasmosis-free cattle (13). MSP5 is, therefore, a strong candidate for a diagnostic test antigen.
The presence of these erythrocyte-stage MSPs on cultured,
animal-infective rickettsiae suggests that the cell culture-derived A. marginale may serve as a source of A. marginale of great potential value for basic and applied research.
Cultures might be used, for example, to assess antigenic stability and
diversity during passage of A. marginale through cattle and
ticks, to determine whether antigens of biological relevance are
expressed selectively on A. marginale derived from ticks, to
develop transformation systems and gene knockouts to discover
rickettsial gene function, for screening of novel therapeutic agents,
and for development of improved diagnostic reagents and vaccines. Use
of cell culture-derived A. marginale may considerably reduce
the need to use cattle as a source of rickettsiae.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Don Knowles, Guy Palmer, and Travis McGuire for sharing
MAb and monospecific antibody reagents.
This work was supported by USDA-NRICGP grant 96-35204-3528.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathobiology, P.O. Box 110880, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0880. Phone: (352) 392-4700. Fax: (352) 392-9704. E-mail: abarbet{at}nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu.
Editor:
J. M. Mansfield
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alderink, F. J., and R. A. Dietrich.
1982.
Economic and epidemiological implications of anaplasmosis in Texas cattle herds, p. 65-75.
In
Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the U.S. Animal Health Association.
|
| 2.
|
Alleman, A. R., and A. F. Barbet.
1996.
Evaluation of Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 3 (MSP3) as a diagnostic test antigen.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:270-276[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Alleman, A. R.,
G. H. Palmer,
T. C. McGuire,
T. F. McElwain,
L. E. Perryman, and A. F. Barbet.
1997.
Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 3 is encoded by a polymorphic, multigene family.
Infect. Immun.
65:156-163[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Allred, D. R.,
T. C. McGuire,
G. H. Palmer,
S. R. Leib,
T. M. Harkins,
T. F. McElwain, and A. F. Barbet.
1990.
Molecular basis for surface antigen size polymorphisms and conservation of a neutralization-sensitive epitope in Anaplasma marginale.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:3220-3224[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Barbet, A. F.
1995.
Recent developments in the molecular biology of anaplasmosis.
Vet. Parasitol.
57:43-49[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Barbet, A. F., and D. R. Allred.
1991.
The msp1 multigene family of Anaplasma marginale: nucleotide sequence analysis of an expressed copy.
Infect. Immun.
59:971-976[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Barbet, A. F.,
G. H. Palmer,
P. J. Myler, and T. C. McGuire.
1987.
Characterization of an immunoprotective protein complex of Anaplasma marginale by cloning and expression of the gene coding for polypeptide Am105L.
Infect. Immun.
55:2428-2435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Blouin, E. F., and K. M. Kocan.
1998.
Morphology and development of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in cultured Ixodes scapularis (Acari:Ixodidae) cells.
J. Med. Entomol.
35:788-797[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Dennis, R. A.,
P. J. O'Hara,
M. F. Young, and K. D. Dorris.
1970.
Neonatal immunohemolytic anemia and icterus of calves.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
156:1861-1867[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Eid, G.,
D. M. French,
A. M. Lundgren,
A. F. Barbet,
T. F. McElwain, and G. H. Palmer.
1996.
Expression of major surface protein 2 antigenic variants during acute Anaplasma marginale rickettsemia.
Infect. Immun.
64:836-841[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
French, D. M.,
T. F. McElwain,
T. C. McGuire, and G. H. Palmer.
1998.
Expression of Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 2 variants during persistent cyclic rickettsemia.
Infect. Immun.
66:1200-1207[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ge, N. L.,
K. M. Kocan,
E. F. Blouin, and G. L. Murphy.
1996.
Developmental studies of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in male Dermacentor andersoni (Acari:Ixodidae) infected as adults using nonradioactive in situ hybridization.
J. Med. Entomol.
33:911-920[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Knowles, D.,
D. E. Torioni,
G. Palmer,
T. McGuire,
D. Stiller, and T. McElwain.
1996.
Antibody against an Anaplasma marginale MSP5 epitope common to tick and erythrocyte stages identifies persistently infected cattle.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
34:2225-2230[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Kocan, K. M.
1986.
Development of Anaplasma marginale in ixodid ticks: coordinated development of a rickettsial organism and its tick host, p. 472-505.
In
J. Sauer, and J. A. Hair (ed.), Morphology, physiology, and behavorial ecology of ticks. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England.
|
| 15.
|
Kocan, K. M.,
W. L. Goff,
D. Stiller,
P. L. Claypool,
W. Edwards,
S. A. Ewing,
T. C. McGuire,
J. A. Hair, and S. J. Barron.
1992.
Development of Anaplasma marginale in male Dermacentor andersoni transferred from infected to susceptible cattle.
Am. J. Vet. Res.
53:499-507[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kocan, K. M.,
W. L. Goff,
D. Stiller,
P. L. Claypool,
W. Edwards,
S. A. Ewing,
J. A. Hair, and S. J. Barron.
1992.
Persistence of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in male Dermacentor andersoni (Acari:Ixodidae) transferred successively from infected to susceptible cattle.
J. Med. Entomol.
29:657-666[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
McCallon, B. R.
1973.
Prevalence and economic aspects of anaplasmosis, p. 1-3.
In
Proceedings of the 6th National Anaplasmosis Conference.
|
| 18.
|
McGarey, D. J.,
A. F. Barbet,
G. H. Palmer,
T. C. McGuire, and D. R. Allred.
1994.
Putative adhesins of Anaplasma marginale: major surface polypeptides 1a and 1b.
Infect. Immun.
62:4594-4601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
McGuire, T. C.,
W. C. Davis,
A. L. Brassfield,
T. F. McElwain, and G. H. Palmer.
1991.
Identification of Anaplasma marginale long-term carrier cattle by detection of serum antibody to isolated MSP-3.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:788-793[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Munderloh, U. G.,
E. F. Blouin,
K. M. Kocan,
N. L. Ge,
W. L. Edwards, and T. J. Kurtti.
1996.
Establishment of the tick (Acari:Ixodidae)-borne cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) in tick cell culture.
J. Med. Entomol.
33:656-664[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Oberle, S. M., and A. F. Barbet.
1993.
Derivation of the complete msp4 gene sequence of Anaplasma marginale without cloning.
Gene
136:291-294[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Oberle, S. M.,
G. H. Palmer, and A. F. Barbet.
1993.
Expression and immune recognition of the conserved MSP4 outer membrane protein of Anaplasma marginale.
Infect. Immun.
61:5245-5251[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Oberle, S. M.,
G. H. Palmer,
A. F. Barbet, and T. C. McGuire.
1988.
Molecular size variations in an immunoprotective protein complex among isolates of Anaplasma marginale.
Infect. Immun.
56:1567-1573[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Palmer, G. H.
1989.
Anaplasma vaccines, p. 1-29.
In
I. G. Wright (ed.), Veterinary protozoan and hemoparasite vaccines. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 25.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
A. F. Barbet,
G. H. Cantor, and T. C. McGuire.
1989.
Immunization of cattle with the MSP-1 surface protein complex induces protection against a structurally variant Anaplasma marginale isolate.
Infect. Immun.
57:3666-3669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
A. F. Barbet,
W. C. Davis, and T. C. McGuire.
1986.
Immunization with an isolate-common surface protein protects cattle against anaplasmosis.
Science
231:1299-1302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
A. F. Barbet,
K. L. Kuttler, and T. C. McGuire.
1986.
Detection of an Anaplasma marginale common surface protein present in all stages of infection.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
23:1078-1083[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
G. Eid,
A. F. Barbet,
T. C. McGuire, and T. F. McElwain.
1994.
The immunoprotective Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 2 is encoded by a polymorphic multigene family.
Infect. Immun.
62:3808-3816[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
K. M. Kocan,
S. J. Barron,
J. A. Hair,
A. F. Barbet,
W. C. Davis, and T. C. McGuire.
1985.
Presence of common antigens, including major surface protein epitopes, between the cattle (intraerythrocytic) and tick stages of Anaplasma marginale.
Infect. Immun.
50:881-886[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Palmer, G. H., and T. C. McGuire.
1984.
Immune serum against Anaplasma marginale initial bodies neutralizes infectivity for cattle.
J. Immunol.
133:1010-1015[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Palmer, G. H.,
S. M. Oberle,
A. F. Barbet,
W. L. Goff,
W. C. Davis, and T. C. McGuire.
1988.
Immunization of cattle with a 36-kilodalton surface protein induces protection against homologous and heterologous Anaplasma marginale challenge.
Infect. Immun.
56:1526-1531[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Swift, B. L., and G. M. Thomas.
1983.
Bovine anaplasmosis: elimination of the carrier state with injectable long-acting oxytetracycline.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
183:63-65[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Vidotto, M. C.,
T. C. McGuire,
T. F. McElwain,
G. H. Palmer, and D. P. J. Knowles.
1994.
Intermolecular relationships of major surface proteins of Anaplasma marginale.
Infect. Immun.
62:2940-2946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Visser, E. S.,
T. C. McGuire,
G. H. Palmer,
W. C. Davis,
V. Shkap,
E. Pipano, and D. P. J. Knowles.
1992.
The Anaplasma marginale msp5 gene encodes a 19-kilodalton protein conserved in all recognized Anaplasma species.
Infect. Immun.
60:5139-5144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, January 1999, p. 102-107, Vol. 67, No. 1
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Noh, S. M., Brayton, K. A., Brown, W. C., Norimine, J., Munske, G. R., Davitt, C. M., Palmer, G. H.
(2008). Composition of the Surface Proteome of Anaplasma marginale and Its Role in Protective Immunity Induced by Outer Membrane Immunization. Infect. Immun.
76: 2219-2226
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blanc, G., Ngwamidiba, M., Ogata, H., Fournier, P.-E., Claverie, J.-M., Raoult, D.
(2005). Molecular Evolution of Rickettsia Surface Antigens: Evidence of Positive Selection. Mol Biol Evol
22: 2073-2083
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kocan, K. M., de la Fuente, J., Guglielmone, A. A., Melendez, R. D.
(2003). Antigens and Alternatives for Control of Anaplasma marginale Infection in Cattle. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
16: 698-712
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lohr, C. V., Brayton, K. A., Shkap, V., Molad, T., Barbet, A. F., Brown, W. C., Palmer, G. H.
(2002). Expression of Anaplasma marginale Major Surface Protein 2 Operon-Associated Proteins during Mammalian and Arthropod Infection. Infect. Immun.
70: 6005-6012
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de la Fuente, J., Garcia-Garcia, J. C., Blouin, E. F., Saliki, J. T., Kocan, K. M.
(2002). Infection of Tick Cells and Bovine Erythrocytes with One Genotype of the Intracellular Ehrlichia Anaplasma marginale Excludes Infection with Other Genotypes. CVI
9: 658-668
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de la Fuente, J., Kocan, K. M.
(2001). Expression of Anaplasma marginale Major Surface Protein 2 Variants in Persistently Infected Ticks. Infect. Immun.
69: 5151-5156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]