Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, January 1999, p. 413-416, Vol. 67, No. 1
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Five Homologous Repeats of the Protein
G-Related Protein MIG Cooperate in Binding to Goat
Immunoglobulin G
József
Vasi,1
Jan
Svensson,1,
Inga-Maria
Frick,2 and
Hans-Peter
Müller1,3,*
Department of Microbiology, SLU,
Uppsala,1 and
Department of Cell and
Molecular Biology, Section for Molecular Pathogenesis, Lund
University, Lund,2 Sweden and
Department
of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Greifswald,
Greifswald, Germany3
Received 5 January 1998/Returned for modification 8 April
1998/Accepted 14 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Protein MIG, from Streptococcus dysgalactiae, binds
2-macroglobulin and immunoglobulin G (IgG). MIG-derived
fusion proteins with one to five IgG-binding repeats differed up to
72,000-fold in avidity for goat IgG, indicating a considerable
cooperativity of the repeats. Significant sequence variation in the
IgG-binding repeats was recognized. Protein MIG interacted with goat
IgG1 via both the Fc and Fab parts.
 |
TEXT |
Streptococcus
dysgalactiae SC1, originally isolated from a bovine mastitis
specimen, expresses a 72-kDa protein (protein MIG) that reacts with
immunoglobulins G (IgG) of different species and subclasses as a type
III Fc receptor (12). The amino acid sequence of protein MIG
shows relationship to protein G (8, 10).
In both molecules a domain in the N terminus binds to the proteinase
inhibitor
2-macroglobulin (
2M) (10,
14). However, the binding regions do not reveal any homology and
protein G binds the native form of
2M while protein MIG
reacts with
2M-protease complexes (13, 14).
The IgG-binding region of protein MIG consists of five repeated
domains, compared to two to three repeated domains in protein G
(5, 8, 17). The IgG-binding repeats of the two molecules are
highly homologous (10). However, the first IgG-binding
repeat of protein MIG differs from any of the protein G repeats by 12 to 13 amino acids, a difference that may alter the interaction with
IgG. To evaluate the influence of these amino acid differences and of
increasing numbers of repeats from protein MIG on its avidity to bind
goat IgG, we constructed maltose-IgG-binding fusion proteins by using
three different primers (Scandinavian Gene Synthesis) based on the
mig gene (10). Primer 1 (5'-CTCGAATTCGTTCAACTAGAAGCACCTACA-3') hybridized at the junction between the
2M-binding domain and the first IgG-binding repeat of
pAM1 (10), nucleotides 1118 to 1138, which added an
EcoRI site 5' to the start of the repeat. Primer 2 (5'-TCATTATTCAGTAACTGTAAAGGTTTTAGT-3') hybridized to the extreme C terminus of each of the first four IgG-binding repeats, nucleotides 1339 to 1316, 1549 to 1526, 1759 to 1736, and 1969 to 1946, which added a tandem stop codon 3' to the repeats. Primer 3 (5'-TCATTAAGGAACTTCAGTAACCATTTC-3') hybridized
at the junction between the fifth IgG-binding repeat and the cell
wall-spanning region, nucleotides 2197 to 2177, which added a tandem
stop codon 3' to the repeat. The combination of primers 1 and 2 resulted in DNA fragments encoding one to four IgG-binding repeats, and the combination of primers 1 and 3 resulted in a DNA fragment encoding
all five IgG-binding repeats. PCR products were ligated into pMAL-C2
(New England Biolabs), and after transformation to Escherichia
coli, five different clones carrying pMAL1R to pMAL5R, which bear
genes encoding maltose-binding proteins fused to various numbers of
IgG-binding repeats, were isolated (Fig.
1A). Additionally, we constructed a clone
with an N-terminal deletion of pMAL1R, designated pMAL1RCT, which
expressed the last 28 amino acids (protein MAL1RCT) of the first
IgG-binding repeat of protein MIG (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the native MIG protein
molecule and the fragments and peptides derived from the IgG-binding
domain. (A) The numbers 1 through 5 indicate the five repeats of the
IgG-binding domain, and the hatched area represents the cell
wall-spanning and membrane-anchoring regions of the native molecule.
The various fragments were expressed as fusions with the
maltose-binding protein (MBP). The molecular masses of the proteins
calculated from the amino acid sequences are given in parentheses. (B)
Schematic representation of the peptides derived from the first
IgG-binding repeat of protein MIG and the C1 domain of protein G. The
numbers above the upper bar indicate the amino acid positions in the
one repeat of protein MIG. The lower bar represents the truncated form
of the repeat (1RCT). The arrows show the sequences of the
11-amino-acid-long peptides derived from the repeat and the
corresponding region in the C1 domain of protein G. The identical amino
acids in these two peptides are indicated by vertical bars.
|
|
Sequencing of the clones over the vector insert junctions revealed a
base substitution in pMAL4R, which caused an amino acid change
(Glu
Gly). The expression of this construct was very weak, and the
molecule was therefore not further studied. Unlike the other proteins,
protein MAL1RCT showed very weak binding when it was applied to
IgG-Sepharose. In Western blots, all purified fusion proteins except
protein MAL1RCT revealed IgG-binding activity (data not shown). Factor
Xa cleavage of MAL1R resulted in one free repeat, which no longer
reacted with IgG in Western blot assays (data not shown). To
investigate the influence of an increasing number of IgG-binding
repeats on the interaction with goat IgG subclasses, the fusion
proteins (MAL1R to MAL5R) were absorbed in wells of microtiter plates
and goat IgG1 and IgG2, purified as recently described (15),
were allowed to compete for the binding of the goat IgG1-alkaline
phosphatase conjugate (alkP-IgG1; Bio-Rad). As shown in Fig.
2, the avidities of MIG constructs for
goat IgG1 increased as the number of IgG-binding repeats increased. Similar curves were obtained with goat IgG2 (data not shown). Data were
analyzed with a curve-fitting program (9, 11), and the IgG
concentrations giving 50% inhibition (IC50) of binding by
the constructs were calculated (Table 1).
These values did not reveal significant differences between goat IgG1
and IgG2, indicating similar reactivities of the fusion proteins to
both subclasses. It is therefore unlikely that any of the IgG-binding repeats could interact exclusively with only one of the goat IgG subclasses.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Inhibition by goat IgG1 of the binding of alkP-goat IgG1
to various MIG-derived fusion proteins immobilized on microtiter
plates.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Goat IgG1 and IgG2 IC50 of the binding
between alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat IgG1 and various fusion
proteins immobilized on the surfaces of microtiter wells
|
|
Earlier experiments with protein G variants containing two or three
repeats have revealed a 10-fold higher affinity for the three-repeat
molecule (2). As protein MIG contains five IgG-binding repeats, it was of interest to evaluate how the increasing number of
repeats would contribute to the avidity for IgG binding. However, the
binding regions of fusion proteins immobilized on solid surfaces may
become partly blocked or sterically hindered. We therefore also
investigated their interaction with goat IgG1 in solution by allowing
them to compete with the binding of alkP-IgG1 to MAL5R-coated microtiter plates. Complete inhibition was observed with all fusion proteins (Fig. 3). The IC50
differed greatly and were 400-, 3,400-, and 72,000-fold higher for
MAL3R, MAL2R, and MAL1R, respectively, than for MAL5R. The
IC50 recalculated with regard to the number of IgG-binding
repeats involved in each assay still differed greatly. We recognized a
linear relationship between the log10 units of the
IC50 and the number of repeats in the fusion protein (data not shown). Thus, the five IgG-binding repeats of protein MIG obviously
cooperate to a considerable extent in the binding of IgG. In light of
the results of experiments with passively immobilized protein MIG
fragments, it is becoming clear that the full IgG-binding activity of
protein MIG is available only when the proteins interact in solution.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Competition between MAL5R applied to the surfaces of
microtiter plates and various protein MIG constructs in solution for
binding of labeled goat IgG1. Samples from dilution series of MAL1R
( ), MAL2R ( ), MAL3R ( ), and MAL5R ( ), mixed with an equal
volume of 105-diluted alkP-goat IgG1, were incubated in
wells of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates coated with MAL5R.
|
|
An inhibitory effect on the binding of IgG1 to MAL5R-coated wells was
also observed with the truncated form of the first IgG-binding repeat
(MAL1RCT) (Fig. 4), but the shape of the
dose-response curve differed from those of the curves obtained with the
other constructs. The MIG-derived amino acid sequence of the truncated form differs in five residues from the corresponding part of the C1
domain in protein G. This region of the protein G domain contains most
of the amino acid residues responsible for binding to the Fc fragments
of immunoglobulins (3, 7). Frick et al. (6) demonstrated that not only a 28-amino-acid synthetic peptide of the C1
domain (corresponding to our MAL1RCT) but also an even smaller peptide
(PG8) of only 11 amino acids could efficiently inhibit the interaction
between protein G and human Fc fragments immobilized on polyacrylamide
beads. Based on the three-dimensional structure of a single protein G
repeat, the 11 residues are localized in the C terminus of the
-helix, the N terminus of the third
-strand, and the loop region
connecting these two structural elements. Recent crystal structure data
confirm that these 11 amino acids are involved in direct contact with
IgG Fc (16). In our experiments, a corresponding
11-amino-acid synthetic peptide from the first repeat of protein MIG
could, like the PG8 peptide from protein G, inhibit the binding of a
protein G fragment (fragment CDC) to human Fc but only at marginally
higher concentrations (Fig. 5).
Nevertheless, the activity of the MIG-derived peptide suggests that
despite the amino acid differences (4 of 11 amino acids [Fig. 1]),
the secondary structure as well as the mode of action of the first MIG
repeat may be similar to those aspects of the C1 domain of protein G.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Inhibition of binding of labeled goat IgG1 to
surface-bound MAL5R by MAL1RCT. The 100% binding value represents the
interaction between the labeled IgG1 and MAL5R in the absence of
inhibitor.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Inhibition of the binding of 125I-labeled
protein G to immobilized human Fc by synthetic peptides derived from
protein MIG ( ) or protein G ( ).
|
|
An earlier study by Eliasson (4) indicated that protein G
binds bovine IgG exclusively via the F(ab')2 part. In
contrast, human Fc fragments strongly interact with protein G but human Fab fragments reveal only 10% of the activity of Fc fragments (1). However, binding of goat IgG to MAL5R may be only
partly inhibited (to about 55%) by human IgG Fc (Fig.
6) whereas binding of labeled rabbit IgG
to the same MIG protein construct was completely inhibited by the human
Fc fragment. Moreover, the interaction between 125I-labeled
goat IgG Fc fragments and the native MIG protein on streptococcal cells
was completely blocked by both human Fc and goat IgG (data not shown).
Thus, there is a clear interaction between protein MIG and goat IgG via
both the Fc and the Fab part of the molecule.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Inhibition of binding of labeled goat IgG1 or labeled
rabbit IgG to MAL5R-coated surfaces by human Fc fragment. The 100%
binding value represents the interaction between labeled IgG and MAL5R
in the absence of inhibitors.
|
|
Although the primary structure (10) suggests that the
valency of protein MIG for IgG is 5, the functional valency has so far
not been determined. Preliminary biosensor data from our laboratory indicate that a single MIG protein molecule may interact with at least
three IgG molecules. It is tempting to speculate that the relatively
large IgG-binding domain of protein MIG with five binding repeats,
connected by extension sequences of 15 amino acids, may mediate the
strong interaction with goat IgG by simultaneously binding to domains
in both the Fc and the Fab part. If such interactions occur in vivo,
they may lead to conformational changes of the IgG molecule, interfere
with complement activation and phagocytosis, and thus act like a
virulence factor.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
József Vasi was supported by a grant from the Swedish Council
for Forestry and Agricultural Research (320413), and Inga-Maria Frick
was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council (project 7480).
We thank Liisa K. Rantamäki, University of Helsinki, for goat
sera and antibodies, Martin Lindberg, SLU, for valuable suggestions, and Lena E. Carlsson, University of Greifswald, for help with the final
version of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of
Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University,
Sauerbruchstr., D-17487 Greifswald, Germany. Phone: 49 3834 865454. Fax: 49 3834 865490. E-mail: Muellerh{at}uni-greifswald.de.
Present address: Department of Plant Biology, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
Editor:
V. A. Fischetti
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Björck, L., and G. Kronvall.
1984.
Purification and some properties of streptococcal protein G, a novel IgG-binding reagent.
J. Immunol.
133:969-974[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Boyle, M. D. P. (ed.).
1990.
Bacterial immunoglobulin-binding proteins: applications in immunotechnology, vol. 2.
Academic Press Inc., San Diego, Calif.
|
| 3.
|
Derrick, J. P., and D. B. Wigley.
1992.
Crystal structure of a streptococcal protein G domain bound to an Fab fragment.
Nature
359:752-754[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Eliasson, M.
1990.
Streptococcal protein G. Structure and function. Ph.D. thesis.
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
|
| 5.
|
Fahnestock, S. R.
1987.
Cloned streptococcal protein G genes.
Trends Biotechnol.
5:79-83.
|
| 6.
|
Frick, I.-M.,
M. Wikström,
S. Forsén,
T. Drakenberg,
H. Gomi,
U. Sjöbring, and L. Björck.
1992.
Convergent evolution among immunoglobulin G-binding bacterial proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:8532-8536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Gronenborn, A. M., and G. M. Clore.
1993.
Identification of the contact surface of a streptococcal protein G domain complexed with human Fc fragment.
J. Mol. Biol.
233:331-335[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Guss, B.,
M. Eliasson,
A. Olsson,
M. Uhlén,
A. K. Frej,
H. Jörnvall,
J. I. Flock, and M. Lindberg.
1986.
Structure of the coccal IgG-binding regions of streptococcus protein G.
EMBO J.
5:1567-1575[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Halfman, C. J.
1981.
Concentrations of binding protein and labeled analyte that are appropriate for measuring at any analyte concentration range in radioimmunoassays.
Methods Enzymol.
74:481-497.
|
| 10.
|
Jonsson, H., and H.-P. Müller.
1994.
The type-III Fc receptor from Streptococcus dysgalactiae is also an 2-macroglobulin receptor.
Eur. J. Biochem.
220:819-826[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Leatherbarrow, R. J.
1992.
GraFit, version 3.0.
Erithacus Software Ltd., Staines, United Kingdom.
|
| 12.
|
Müller, H.-P., and H. Blobel.
1983.
Purification and properties of the receptor for the Fc-component of immunoglobulin G from Streptococcus dysgalactiae.
Zentbl. Bakteriol. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. A
254:352-360.
|
| 13.
|
Müller, H.-P., and H. Blobel.
1985.
Binding of human alpha-2-macroglobulin to streptococci of group A, B, C and G, p. 96-98.
In
Y. Kimura, S. Kotami, and Y. Shiokawa (ed.), Recent advances in streptococci and streptococcal diseases. Reedbooks Ltd., Bracknell, Berkshire, England.
|
| 14.
|
Müller, H.-P., and L. K. Rantamäki.
1995.
Binding of native 2-macroglobulin to human group G streptococci.
Infect. Immun.
63:2833-2839[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Rantamäki, L. K., and H.-P. Müller.
1995.
Purification of goat immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG2 antibodies by use of Streptococcus dysgalactiae cells with Fc receptors.
Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.
45:115-126[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Sauer-Eriksson, A. E.,
G. J. Kleywegt,
M. Uhlén, and T. A. Jones.
1995.
Crystal structure of the C2 fragment of streptococcal protein G in complex with the Fc domain of human IgG.
Structure
3:265-278[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Sjöbring, U.,
L. Björck, and W. Kastern.
1991.
Streptococcal protein G. Gene structure and protein binding properties.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:399-405[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, January 1999, p. 413-416, Vol. 67, No. 1
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Song, X.-M., Perez-Casal, J., Fontaine, M. C., Potter, A. A.
(2002). Bovine immunoglobulin A (IgA)-binding activities of the surface-expressed Mig protein of Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Microbiology
148: 2055-2064
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Song, X.-M., Perez-Casal, J., Bolton, A., Potter, A. A.
(2001). Surface-Expressed Mig Protein Protects Streptococcus dysgalactiae against Phagocytosis by Bovine Neutrophils. Infect. Immun.
69: 6030-6037
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vasi, J., Frykberg, L., Carlsson, L. E., Lindberg, M., Guss, B.
(2000). M-Like Proteins of Streptococcus dysgalactiae. Infect. Immun.
68: 294-302
[Abstract]
[Full Text]