Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, October 1999, p. 5069-5075, Vol. 67, No. 10
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Mycobacterium avium Infection of Epithelial Cells
Results in Inhibition or Delay in the Release of Interleukin-8
and RANTES
Felix J.
Sangari,
Mary
Petrofsky, and
Luiz E.
Bermudez*
Kuzell Institute for Arthritis and Infectious
Diseases, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San
Francisco, California 94115
Received 3 May 1999/Returned for modification 14 June 1999/Accepted 14 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mycobacterium avium is an opportunistic pathogen in
AIDS patients, who acquire the infection mainly through the
gastrointestinal tract. Previous studies in vitro have shown that
M. avium invades epithelial cells of both intestinal and
laryngeal origin. In addition, M. avium enters the
intestinal mucosa of healthy mice. Because M. avium
invasion of the intestinal mucosa in vivo initially is not accompanied
by significant influx of inflammatory cells, we sought to determine
whether M. avium would trigger chemokine release upon entry
into epithelial cells by using HT-29 intestinal and HEp-2 laryngeal
epithelial cell lines. Chemokine synthesis was measured both by the
presence of specific mRNA and protein secretion in the cell culture
supernatant as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Infection of HT-29 intestinal cells with M. avium did not
induce the release of interleukin-8 (IL-8) or RANTES for up to 7 days
postinfection. However, infection of HEp-2 cells resulted in the
release of IL-8 and RANTES at 72 h. Similar findings were observed
with other AIDS M. avium isolates belonging to different
serovars. Secretion of IL-8 by HEp-2 cells was dependent upon bacterial
uptake. In addition, prior infection with M. avium suppressed IL-8 production by HT-29 cells infected with
Salmonella typhimurium. Our results suggest that M. avium infection of epithelial cells is associated with a delay in
IL-8 and RANTES production which, in the case of HT-29, is prolonged up
to 1 week. These findings may explain the weak inflammatory response
after intestinal mucosa invasion in mice and are probably related with
the ability of the bacterium to evade the host's immune response.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infections caused by organisms of
the Mycobacterium avium complex are the most common
bacterial infection in patients with AIDS (11, 14). In AIDS
patients, in contrast to individuals without AIDS, where the pulmonary
infection is more frequent, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract appears to
be the primary route of M. avium infection (7, 15,
22). Colonization of the intestine is usually observed months
prior to the diagnosis of disseminated infection (7, 22,
26), and it is assumed to be a risk factor for the disseminated disease.
We have shown that M. avium is able to bind to and invade
intestinal and laryngeal epithelial cells in vitro (3, 4). In addition, when given orally to mice, M. avium enters the
intact intestinal mucosa and subsequently disseminates (2).
Epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosal surface form a major
mechanical barrier that separates the host's internal milieu from the
external environment. Mucosal surfaces have a highly specialized immune
system, and mucosal epithelial cells produce an array of cytokines and
chemokines in response to different stimuli. The existence of mucosal
cytokine response to infection was first shown to occur in mice as well
as in patients after urinary tract colonization by Escherichia
coli (10). In addition, secretion of interleukin-6
(IL-6), IL-1
, and IL-8 have been demonstrated in a number of studies
in vitro and in vivo after infection of mucosal epithelial cells with
E. coli (9), Helicobacter pylori (6, 13, 24), Salmonella spp. (16, 27),
and Shigella spp. (16), as well as other
microorganisms (23).
In mice, infection of the intestinal mucosa by M. avium is
followed by little inflammatory response, with neutrophil infiltration of the Peyer's patches being observed approximately 1 week after infection and migration of mononuclear cells to the site of infection thereafter (17). Because the release of chemokines, such as IL-8 (a potent T-cell and neutrophil recruitment factor) has been reported in a number of inflammatory conditions of the mucosal layer,
we investigated, using two different cell lines, whether M. avium infection of epithelial cells results in the induction of
chemokine secretion.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacteria.
M. avium strains 101 (serovar 1), 104 (serovar 1), and 100 (serovar 8) were isolated from the blood of AIDS
patients. Mycobacterium smegmatis 11727 and Salmonella
typhimurium 15277 were purchased from The American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC), Rockville, Md. E. coli DH5
was a gift
from Raul Barletta (University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebr.).
M. avium strains were cultured in Middlebrook 7H10 agar
supplemented with oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) for 10 days and harvested in
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), whereas M. smegmatis was
harvested after 3 days in culture as described previously
(3). Only colonies of M. avium expressing the
transparent morphotype were used in the experiments. S. typhimurium and E. coli were cultured in Luria-Bertani
broth for 24 h under static conditions.
Because of the tendency of mycobacteria to form clumps, the inoculum
was carefully prepared to ensure a dispersed preparation
as described
earlier (
1). The viability of the inoculum was
determined by
both plating onto 7H10 agar and by visualization
under fluorescent
microscopy by using the LIVE-DEAD assay (Molecular
Probes, Eugene,
Oreg.) as previously reported (
1).
Cell cultures.
The human intestinal epithelial cell line
HT-29 was obtained from the ATCC. Cells were grown in a medium
consisting of modified McCoy-5A medium (Difco) with 10% of galactose
(Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma).
The HEp-2 laryngeal cell line was also obtained from the ATCC, and it
was maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum as
described previously (4).
Cell lines were used between passages 15 and 20. HT-29 and HEp-2 cells
were seeded in 24-well or 12-well tissue culture plates
(Costar,
Cambridge, Mass.) at 1 × 10
5 or 2 × 10
5 cells per well, respectively, in a volume of 1 ml, and
then cultured
to 90 to 100% confluence. HT-29 cells were also seeded
on transwell
membrane (3-µm pore size) and allowed to achieve
confluence (ca.
1 week). The integrity of the polarized monolayers on
transwell
was determined by measuring the transmembrane resistance.
Monolayers
were used when the resistance reached approximately 400

/cm
2.
Monolayers were infected with bacteria by removing the medium and
replacing it with 1 ml of medium containing 10
6 organisms
to each well in the 24-well tissue culture plate and
transwell
monolayers or 2 × 10
6 in each well in the 12-well
plates.
Invasion assay and intracellular growth.
The invasion assay
was performed as previously described (3, 4), with the
modification that bacteria were allowed to invade for 1 h at
37°C instead of 2 h as originally described (4).
After 1 h, cells were washed to remove unattached bacteria and
incubated with 200 µg of amikacin per ml for 2 h (4).
Then, cells were lysed by adding 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma), and the
lysate was subsequently diluted and plated onto 7H10 agar to quantitate the viable intracellular bacteria. Results were reported as a percentage of the initial inoculum that entered both HT-29 and HEp-2
cells. The viability of the infected monolayers versus uninfected control was monitored during the experiments by trypan blue exclusion and did not show any differential cytotoxic effect related to the
presence of the bacteria.
Infected transwell monolayers were maintained for up to 1 week, and the
integrity of the monolayer was verified daily by measuring
the
resistance between both
membranes.
Coinfection experiments.
To determine whether M. avium infection of HT-29 cells would suppress IL-8 production by
the cells after uptake of S. typhimurium, we infected a
100% confluent HT-29 cell monolayer with 107 or
108 M. avium 101 for 1 h; this was then
washed and treated with amikacin for 2 h as described above. After
18 h the monolayers were infected with S. typhimurium
(105 cells) for 2 h and then treated with gentamicin
(20 µg/ml) for 1 h. Monolayers were then washed, and 24 h
later the supernatants were obtained to measure IL-8 concentration.
Controls of cells without infection, infected with M. avium
or Salmonella were run in parallel.
To determine whether
M. avium and
Salmonella were
coinfecting the same cells, we performed similar assays in LabTek
chamber
slides as reported (
1,
4).
After
M. avium and/or
Salmonella infection and
treatment with antibiotics, the monolayers were fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde
for 30 min at room temperature. After being washed
with Hank's
balanced salt solution (HBSS), monolayers were incubated
with
Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 10 min and then washed three more times
with HBSS. Rabbit anti-
M. avium antibody (1:40) and
fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled anti-rabbit antibody
(1:400), as
well as mouse anti-
S. typhimurium (1:30)
antibody and Texas Red
anti-mouse antibody (1:800), were used to
identify the bacteria.
After a washing, the slides were mounted and
observed by using
a light microscope (Nikkon). Intracellular bacteria
in 100 cells
per field in 10 fields were numbered by using a source of
UV light
and specific filters for FITC and Texas
Red.
Assays for chemokine release.
Monolayers were infected with
bacteria or incubated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Infection was
allowed to occur for 1 h at 37°C, and then the wells were washed
with HBSS to remove noninternalized bacteria. Fresh medium was then
added, and at 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after infection, supernatants
were obtained, filtered through a 0.22-pore-size-µm filter to remove
residual bacteria and cell debris, and frozen at
20°C.
Concentration of human IL-8 and RANTES, as well as IL-1

, IL-1

,
transforming growth factor

(TGF-

), and IL-6 were measured
in the
supernatant by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
by using kits
purchased from R & D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.,
and BioSource,
Camarillo, Calif. The assays were carried out according
to directions
provided by the
manufacturers.
RNA preparation and RT-PCR analysis.
To determine the
relative level of IL-8 mRNA transcription, total RNA was obtained with
the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Santa Clarita, CA), following the
supplier's instructions, from 12-well infected monolayers. It was then
retrotranscribed with the Ready-To-Go T-Primed First-Strand Kit
(Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), and quantitated by reverse transcriptase
PCR (RT-PCR) with previously described primers (ATG ACT TCC AAG CTG GCC
GTG GCT and TCT CAG CCC TCT TCA AAA ACT TCT C) for IL-8 and GADPH
(glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as a control (TGA AGG TCG
GAG TCA ACG GAT TTG CT and CAT GTG GGC CAT GAG GTC CAC CAC)
(16).
The samples were heated at 94°C for 4 min and then subjected to 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 60°C
for
30 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s in a GeneAmp PCR
System
2400 (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.). Then, 10 µl of the
PCR
products was separated on 1.5% agarose gels and visualized by
staining with ethidium
bromide.
Statistical analysis.
Each experiment was repeated at least
three times, and the results were expressed as the mean ± the
standard deviation. The significance of the differences between
experimental groups was analyzed by the Student's t test. A
P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Chemokine and cytokine production by uninfected cells.
HT-29
intestinal cells do not produce IL-1
, IL-1
, IL-6, or RANTES
constitutively. However, IL-8 and TGF-
(ca. 800 and 700 pg,
respectively) were observed in uninfected HT-29, confirming results
shown by Eckmann and colleagues (8). Uninfected HEp-2 produced approximately 1,600 pg of IL-8 and 1,400 pg of RANTES per ml.
Chemokine and cytokine production after infection in vitro.
After infection with M. avium at a ratio of 10:1, HT-29
cells secreted IL-8 at similar levels of noninfected monolayer at 24, 48, 72, 96, and 168 h (Fig. 1). In
addition, no production of other inflammatory cytokines (IL-1
,
IL-1
, and IL-6) was observed (data not shown). In contrast, HT-29
cells infected with a 10:1 ratio of S. typhimurium produced
6,400 ± 150 pg of IL-8 by 24 h.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Production of IL-8 by infected HT-29 cells overtime.
HT-29 cells (confluent monolayers) were infected with M. avium 101 (MAC101) (MOIs of 1, 10, or 100) for several days, and
IL-8 production was measured in the supernatant after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 days. Results are shown for the assays by using an MOI of 10. Cells
infected with S. typhimurium produced 343 ± 29 pg of
IL-8 per ml after 24 h (data not shown).
|
|
HEp-2 cells infected with
M. avium did not synthesize
increased amounts of chemokines (IL-8 and RANTES) for the first 48 h,
but a significant increase of IL-8 and RANTES was observed at
72 h (Fig.
2). Greater ratios of
infection than 10:1 (100:1) resulted
in production of IL-8 after
24 h (data not shown).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Production of chemokines by HEp-2 cells infected with
M. avium 101 (MAC101). (A) IL-8. (B) RANTES. Cells were
infected with an MOI of 10. *, P < 0.05 compared
with the uninfected control.
|
|
Production of IL-8 and RANTES did not change independently of the
M. avium strains (100, 104, and 101) used in the experiment.
As shown in Fig.
3, in contrast to
M. avium and
E. coli DH5

,
a noninvasive
strain of
E. coli, infection of HEp-2 cells with
S. typhimurium triggered a significant release of IL-8 after
24
h.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Production of chemokines by HEp-2 cells infected with
different M. avium strains, M. smegmatis,
Salmonella, and E. coli DH5 for 24 to 72 h. (A) IL-8. (B) RANTES. Monolayers were infected with an MOI of 10. For the 72-h time point of M. avium-infected cells compared
with uninfected control and for Salmonella at the three time
points, the P value is <0.05.
|
|
The viability of HEp-2 and HT-29 monolayers was not affected by
M. avium and remained 96 ± 2% after
M. avium infection.
M. avium infection of polarized HT-29 monolayer in transwell
plates did not result in either IL-8 or RANTES production for
up to
72 h after infection, a result similar to that observed
in assays
with cell monolayers on plastic. The concentration of
chemokines was
measured in both the apical and basal
supernatants.
To confirm the level of infection of the monolayers, HEp-2 monolayers
infected with bacterial strains were lysed, and the
percentage of
initial inoculum within cells was determined. Cells
infected for 1 h with
M. avium 101 had taken up 3.6% of the inoculum,
while cells infected with
M. avium strains 104 and 100 had
taken
up 3.2 and 1.8% of the inoculum, respectively.
M. smegmatis had
0.04% of the inoculum taken up by HEp-2 cells. The
uptake of
E. coli DH5

was 0.0018%, and that for
S. typhimurium was approximately
26% of the inoculum (Table
1). Because
Salmonella invades
HEp-2
cells more efficiently than
M. avium, we repeated the
assay with
a 100:1 ratio of
M. avium and a 10:1 ratio
Salmonella per cell.
After 2 h of uptake, the number of
intracellular bacteria was
determined and shown to be similar. We then
measured IL-8 production
by the monolayers after 24 h. As shown in
Fig.
4,
Salmonella still
induced significantly more IL-8 production, while
M. avium
uptake
did not induce IL-8 at 24 h, which can be explained by
the shorter
replication time of
Salmonella compared with
M. avium.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Comparative production of IL-8 by HEp-2 cells after
24 h of infection with similar number of intracellular M. avium 101 (MAC101) and S. typhimurium. P
values were <0.05 for the comparison between Salmonella and
the control and <0.05 for the comparison between M. avium
101 and the control.
|
|
mRNA.
As shown in Fig. 5A and B,
RT-PCR with total RNA extracted from HT-29 and HEp-2 cells confirmed
the results shown by ELISA that M. avium does not trigger
IL-8 production by epithelial cells.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
IL-8 mRNA upon M. avium infection. (A) HT-29
cells infected with M. avium 101 at an MOI of 100. (B) HEp-2
cells infected with M. avium 101 at an MOI of 10. (C) HEp-2
cells infected with MAC101 at an MOI of 100. Lanes: 1, 1 kb plus
molecular weight marker; 2, negative control; 3, uninfected control; 4, 4 h after infection; 5, 24 h after infection; 6, 48 h
after infection; 7, 72 h after infection; 8, Salmonella-infected cells for 4 h. The amplified
products are IL-8 (289 bp) and GADPH (983 bp).
|
|
Uptake is necessary to induce IL-8 production.
Previous
studies have determined that M. avium entry into both HEp-2
and HT-29 cells was accompanied by cytoskeleton rearrangement and
incubation of epithelial cells with cytochalasin prior to the exposure
to the bacterium would block uptake (4). Cytochalasin D (5 µM, a concentration that blocks 90 ± 4% of M. avium
uptake) was then used to examine whether bacterium uptake was necessary to induce IL-8 production by HEp-2 cells. Cytochalasin was added for 30 min and then removed, and then M. avium 101 was used to infect HEp-2 monolayers (at a multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 10).
After 2 h, extracellular bacteria was removed by washing, and
amikacin (200 µg/ml) was used for an additional 2 h to kill extracellular bacteria. As shown in Fig.
6, IL-8 production after 72 h of
incubation did not occur if uptake was inhibited. Cytochalasin D,
however, when added alone or 1 h after M. avium
infection, did not have influence on chemokine production by HEp-2
cells. In addition, cytochalasin D does not block IL-8 production by HEp-2 cells stimulated with IL-1
(data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Production of IL-8 by HEp-2 cell requires M. avium uptake. Cells were treated or not treated with cytochalasin
D (CD) for 30 min (known to prevent M. avium uptake) and
then exposed to M. avium 101 (MAC101) (MOI 10) after 2 h; extracellular bacteria were removed by washing. Supernatants were
obtained after 24, 48, and 72 h, and the IL-8 concentration was
determined. Production of IL-8 was not observed on cytochalasin
D-treated monolayers.
|
|
M. avium blocks IL-8 production in response to
Salmonella invasion.
HT-29 monolayers were infected
with either 107 or 108 (to maximize the number
of infected cells) M. avium 101 and 18 h later infected
with S. typhimurium (105/well) for 1 h.
Preinfection with M. avium resulted in complete blockage of
IL-8 release by 24 h after S. typhimurium infection (Fig. 7). To determine the percentage of
cells that had the two bacteria, we stained intracellular bacteria with
different colors and scored them. We found that 78 ± 4% of the
cells had at least one M. avium bacillus, while 81 ± 6% of the cells had at least one Salmonella organism and
that 72 ± 5% of the cells in the monolayer were coinfected with
M. avium and Salmonella.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
IL-8 production by HT-29 cells coinfected with M. avium 101 (MAC101) and S. typhimurium. HT-29 monolayers
were infected with M. avium (107 or
108 bacteria) for 1 h and after 18 h were
coinfected with S. typhimurium (105 bacteria).
Approximately 70% of the cells in the monolayers were coinfected as
evidenced by light microscopy as described in Materials and Methods.
M. avium infection suppresses IL-8 production after
Salmonella invasion of HT-29 cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several studies have demonstrated that M. avium
infection in AIDS patients is acquired primarily through the GI tract
(7, 15, 22). When M. avium is given orally to
healthy C57BL/6 mice, the bacterium invades the intact mucosa of the
intestinal tract and secondarily causes disseminated infection
(2). Epithelial cells are the first cell type to encounter
bacteria at mucosal sites. It was proposed that epithelial cell
cytokine-chemokine production could function as an "early warning
system" of mucosal infection. In fact, a number of microorganisms
have been shown to induce cytokine-chemokine synthesis upon contact
with epithelial cells such as IL-8, MCP-1, granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-6, and
IL-1
(6, 8, 16, 20).
In this study we show that M. avium uptake by both HT-29
intestinal and HEp-2 laryngeal cell lines does not result in the release of chemokines for several days. We found that the ability to
delay IL-8 and RANTES production was shared among the three strains of
M. avium (representing the three most common serovars isolated from AIDS patients). It is interesting that previous studies
by Yuanguang et al. (28) and Rhoades et al. (21)
had shown that Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of the
A549 lung epithelial cell line and macrophages, respectively, trigger
the release of great amounts of chemokines, including IL-8. In fact, Yuanguang et al. also showed that M. avium infection of A549
cells did not induce the synthesis of IL-8 and MCP-1. Although these authors argued that M. avium's failure to induce chemokine
production was due to the inability to grow intracellularly, this is
not the case with both HT-29 and HEp-2 cells, in which M. avium grows intracellularly (4). These findings suggest
that the initial mechanisms of pathogenesis (i.e., contact with the
epithelial layer) differ significantly between M. avium and
M. tuberculosis. It is certainly plausible to hypothesize
that, because of the decreased intrinsic virulence compared with
M. tuberculosis, M. avium is required to prevent
immune response early in the infection to survive. M. avium
infection of the intestinal mucosa ultimately causes segmental necrosis
of the intestinal villi followed by the influx of inflammatory cells
(17). However, this is not observed until several weeks
after infection, which suggests that M. avium infection of
intestinal epithelial cells is a quiet process in its beginning.
While bacteria such as Salmonella trigger chemokine
production soon after entering intestinal cells (27), it has
been shown that organisms such as Chlamydia sp. also delay
inflammation for several hours (20). Therefore, it may be
important to some bacteria to maintain the immune system of the host
"in check" while the infection is being established. Several of the
cytokines and chemokines are potent chemoattractants and activators for
neutrophils, monocytes, and T lymphocytes (8, 25). The fact
that intestinal epithelial cells can participate in the network of
cytokine-chemokine response and the observation that these cells can
express human lymphocyte antigen class II molecules suggests a role for
them in the mucosal defense against M. avium infection.
Cytokines and chemokines in the intestinal mucosa provide bidirectional
communication between inflammatory cells such as tissue macrophages,
monocytes, T cells, and epithelial cells. Inhibition of chemokines
production appears to be secondary to active interaction of the
bacterium and epithelial cells. Although M. avium infection
cannot inhibit RANTES and IL-8 production after LPS stimulation (data
not shown), it significantly inhibits IL-8 production after stimulation
with Salmonella, suggesting that the mechanisms of chemokine
stimulation is probably different for LPS and Salmonella.
This also implies that M. avium infection actively blocks
some step the signal transduction pathway triggered by
Salmonella and does not simply remain quiet in the host
cell, thus resembling the case of Yersinia, which is able to
interrupt host cell pathways through the secretion of Yop proteins
(19).
The findings that M. avium triggers different responses in
HT-29 intestinal and HEp-2 laryngeal cells could be relevant for the
pathogenesis of the infection and is currently being investigated. However, it also suggests either that the signal transduction pathways
for chemokine synthesis differ between the cells or that the mechanism
of M. avium invasion of HT-29 cells is probably different
from the mechanism of invasion of HEp-2 cells.
It is interesting to speculate that in human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals, infection of the intestinal mucosa
with HIV-1 prior to M. avium may be associated with
production of chemokines (18), although HIV-1 has been shown
to enter the intestinal mucosa through M cells (5), whereas M. avium invades the intestinal mucosa primarily through
enterocytes (12).
Our findings offer another perspective on M. avium infection
of the host, with little initial inflammatory response followed, depending on the cell infected, by the release of inflammatory cytokines (17). However, it seems important for M. avium to be able to prevent cytokines and chemokine synthesis by
infected cells, potentially creating a protective shield against the
host immune response.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Karen Allen for preparing the manuscript.
This work was supported by contract N01-AI-25140 of the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. F.J.S. was supported by a
fellowship of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Kuzell
Institute, 2200 Webster St., Ste. 305, San Francisco, CA 94115. Phone:
(415) 561-1734. Fax: (415) 441-8548. E-mail:
luizb{at}cooper.cpmc.org.
Editor:
S. H. E. Kaufmann
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bermudez, L. E.,
A. Parker, and J. Goodman.
1997.
Growth within macrophages increases the efficiency of Mycobacterium avium to invade other macrophages by complement receptor independent pathway.
Infect. Immun.
65:1916-1922[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bermudez, L. E.,
M. Petrofsky,
P. Kolonoski, and L. S. Young.
1992.
An animal model of Mycobacterium avium complex disseminated infection after colonization of the intestinal tract.
J. Infect. Dis.
165:75-79[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bermudez, L. E.,
K. Shelton, and L. S. Young.
1995.
Comparison of the ability of M. avium, M. smegmatis, and M. tuberculosis to invade and replicate within HEp-2 epithelial cells.
Tubercle Lung Dis.
76:240-247[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bermudez, L. E., and L. S. Young.
1994.
Factors affecting invasion of HT-29 and HEp-2 epithelial cells by organisms of the Mycobacterium avium complex.
Infect. Immun.
62:2021-2026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bomsel, M.
1997.
Transcytosis of infectious human immunodeficiency virus across a tight human epithelial cell line barrier.
Nat. Med.
3:42-46[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cole, S. P.,
D. Cirillo,
M. F. Kagnoff,
D. G. Guiney, and L. Eckmann.
1997.
Coccoid and spiral Helicobacter pylori differ in their abilities to adhere to gastric epithelial cells and induce interleukin-8 secretion.
Infect. Immun.
65:843-846[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Damsker, B., and E. J. Bottone.
1985.
Mycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare from the intestinal tracts of patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: concepts regarding acquisition and pathogenesis.
J. Infect. Dis.
151:179-180[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Eckmann, L.,
M. F. Kagnoff, and J. Fierer.
1995.
Intestinal epithelial cells as watch dogs for the natural immune system.
Trends Microbiol.
3:118-120[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hedges, S. R.,
W. W. Agace, and C. Svanborg.
1995.
Epithelial cytokine responses and mucosal cytokine networks.
Trends Microbiol.
3:266-270[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hedges, S. R.,
M. Bjarnadotter,
W. Agace,
L. Hang, and C. Svanberg.
1996.
Immunoregulatory cytokines modify Escherichia coli induced uroepithelial cell IL-6 and IL-8 responses.
Cytokine
8:686-697[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Horsburgh, C. R., Jr.
1991.
Mycobacterium avium complex in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
N. Engl. J. Med.
324:1332-1338[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hsu, N.,
J. R. Goodman,
L. S. Young, and L. E. Bermudez.
1996.
Interaction between Mycobacterium avium complex and intestinal mucosal cells in vivo, abstr. B35, p. 26.
In
Program and abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 13.
|
Huang, J.,
P. W. O'Toole,
P. Doig, and T. J. Trust.
1995.
Stimulation of interleukin-8 production in epithelial cell lines by Helicobacter pylori.
Infect. Immun.
63:1732-1738[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Inderlied, C. B.,
C. A. Kemper, and L. E. Bermudez.
1993.
The Mycobacterium avium complex.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
6:266-310[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Jacobson, M. A.,
P. C. Hopewell,
D. M. Yajko,
W. K. Hadley,
E. Lazarus,
P. K. Mohanty,
G. W. Modin,
D. W. Feigal,
P. S. Cusick, and M. A. Sande.
1991.
Natural history of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in AIDS.
J. Infect. Dis.
164:994-998[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jung, H. C.,
L. Eckman,
S. K. Yang,
A. Panga,
J. Freier,
E. Morzychka-Wroblewska, and M. F. Kagnoff.
1995.
A distinct array of proinflammatory cytokines is expressed in human colon epithelial cells in response to bacterial invasion.
J. Clin. Invest.
95:55-65.
|
| 17.
|
Kim, S. Y.,
J. R. Goodman,
M. Petrofsky, and L. E. Bermudez.
1998.
Mycobacterium avium infection of the gut mucosa in mice is associated with later inflammatory response and ultimately results in areas of intestinal cell necrosis.
J. Med. Microbiol.
47:725-731[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
McGowan, I.,
G. Radford-Smith, and D. P. Jewell.
1994.
Cytokine gene expression in HIV-infected intestinal mucosa.
AIDS
8:1569-1575[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Mecsas, J.,
B. Raupach, and S. Falkow.
1998.
The Yersinia yops inhibit invasion of Listeria, Shigella and Edwardsiella but not Salmonella into epithelial cells.
Mol. Microbiol.
28:1269-1281[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Rasmussen, S. J.,
L. Eckmann,
A. J. Quayle,
L. Shen,
Y. X. Zhang,
D. J. Anderson,
J. Fierer,
R. S. Stephens, and M. F. Kagnoff.
1997.
Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells in response to chlamydia infection suggests a central role for epithelial cells in chlamydial pathogenesis.
J. Clin. Invest.
99:77-87[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Rhoades, E. R.,
A. M. Cooper, and I. M. Orme.
1995.
Chemokine response in mice infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun.
63:3871-3877[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Roth, R. I.,
R. L. Owen,
D. F. Keren, and P. A. Volberding.
1985.
Intestinal infection with Mycobacterium avium in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Histological and clinical comparison with Whipple's disease.
Dig. Dis. Sci.
30:497-504[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Schuerer-Maly, C. C.,
L. Eckmann,
M. F. Kagnoff,
M. T. Falco, and F. E. Maly.
1994.
Colonic epithelial cell lines as a source of interleukin-8: stimulation by inflammatory cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
Immunology
81:85-91[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Sharma, S. A.,
M. K. R. Tummuru,
G. B. Miller, and M. J. Blaser.
1995.
Interleukin-8 response of gastric epithelial cell lines to Helicobacter pylori stimulation in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
63:1681-1687[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Stadnyk, A. W.
1994.
Cytokine production by epithelial cells.
FASEB J.
8:1041-1047[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Torriani, F.,
J. N. Maslow,
R. Kornbluth,
R. D. Arbeit,
J. A. McCutchan,
P. Hasegawa,
L. Keays, and D. Havlir.
1995.
Analysis of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates infecting multiple organs of AIDS patients using pulsed field gel electrophoresis, abstr. I91, p. 221.
In
Program and abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 27.
|
Weinstein, D. L.,
B. L. O'Neill, and E. S. Metcalf.
1997.
Salmonella typhi stimulation of human intestinal epithelial cells induces secretion of epithelial cell-derived interleukin-6.
Infect. Immun.
65:395-404[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Yuanguang, L.,
M. Zhang, and P. Barnes.
1998.
Chemokine production by a human alveolar epithelial cell line in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:1121-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, October 1999, p. 5069-5075, Vol. 67, No. 10
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Flaherty, D. K., Vesosky, B., Beamer, G. L., Stromberg, P., Turner, J.
(2006). Exposure to Mycobacterium avium can modulate established immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection generated by Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination. J. Leukoc. Biol.
80: 1262-1271
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Petrofsky, M., Bermudez, L. E.
(2005). CD4+ T Cells but Not CD8+ or {gamma}{delta}+ Lymphocytes Are Required for Host Protection against Mycobacterium avium Infection and Dissemination through the Intestinal Route. Infect. Immun.
73: 2621-2627
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lacroix-Lamande, S., Mancassola, R., Naciri, M., Laurent, F.
(2002). Role of Gamma Interferon in Chemokine Expression in the Ileum of Mice and in a Murine Intestinal Epithelial Cell Line after Cryptosporidium parvum Infection. Infect. Immun.
70: 2090-2099
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jeevan, A., Yoshimura, T., Foster, G., McMurray, D. N.
(2002). Effect of Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccination on Interleukin-1{beta} and RANTES mRNA Expression in Guinea Pig Cells Exposed to Attenuated and Virulent Mycobacteria. Infect. Immun.
70: 1245-1253
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
ZHU, J., QIU, Y. S., MAJUMDAR, S., GAMBLE, E., MATIN, D., TURATO, G., FABBRI, L. M., BARNES, N., SAETTA, M., JEFFERY, P. K.
(2001). Exacerbations of Bronchitis . Bronchial Eosinophilia and Gene Expression for Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, and Eosinophil Chemoattractants. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
164: 109-116
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sangari, F. J., Goodman, J., Petrofsky, M., Kolonoski, P., Bermudez, L. E.
(2001). Mycobacterium avium Invades the Intestinal Mucosa Primarily by Interacting with Enterocytes. Infect. Immun.
69: 1515-1520
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, H.-S., Kolonoski, P., Chang, Y. Y., Bermudez, L. E.
(2000). Invasion of the Brain and Chronic Central Nervous System Infection after Systemic Mycobacterium avium Complex Infection in Mice. Infect. Immun.
68: 2979-2984
[Abstract]
[Full Text]