Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, November 1999, p. 5747-5754, Vol. 67, No. 11
Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology of
Infection, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, University of
Porto, Porto, Portugal,1 and Department
of Tuberculosis Immunology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen,
Denmark2
Received 9 April 1999/Returned for modification 31 May
1999/Accepted 26 August 1999
We examined the role of cytokines in the development of gamma
interferon (IFN- Tuberculosis still accounts for the
deaths of around three million patients every year (13), and
the emergence of multiple-drug-resistant microorganisms makes this
disease a major health problem (14). The design of a
tuberculosis vaccine that will perform better than Mycobacterium
bovis BCG may aid in the solution of the tuberculosis epidemic. In
that context, a subunit protein vaccine, composed of the secreted
antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is a potential candidate (2, 19, 33, 34). These preparations will have to
be administered together with an adjuvant that will prime T cells for a
protective function as well as for secretion of gamma interferon
(IFN- Cytokines involved in the development of T cells in a type 1 pattern of
response include interleukin-12 (IL-12) (50) and IL-18
(29, 32, 38, 48). On the other hand, IL-4 has the opposite
effect by decreasing the expression of the beta 2 chain of the IL-12
receptor, thereby preventing the action of IL-12 on the T-helper-cell
precursors (40, 47). The role of IL-6 is unclear since it
has been shown that this cytokine is required for the induction of
protective Th1 cells during experimental infections by
Mycobacterium avium (5), M. tuberculosis (23), and Listeria
monocytogenes (25-27), whereas others have shown that IL-6 is involved in the generation of Th2 responses (37).
Additionally, it has been shown that IL-6 can act on the infected
macrophages harboring mycobacteria and promote mycobacterial growth
(12, 44) or antagonize the effects of
bacteriostasis-inducing cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha
(7).
We therefore decided to investigate the roles of several cytokines
involved in the response to a tuberculosis subunit vaccine that
includes ST-CF from M. tuberculosis as the antigen and DDA as the adjuvant. Our data demonstrate that both IL-6 and IL-12 are
required for an efficient priming of an IFN- Animals.
C57BL/6 female mice, aged 7 to 14 weeks, were
purchased from the Gulbenkian Institute (Oeiras, Portugal). IL-6
gene-knockout (IL6-KO) mice and wild-type control mice derived from
(C57BL/6 × 129)F2 interbreeding were a kind gift from
Manfred Kopf (22) and were maintained at our animal
facilities. IL6-KO mice with a C57BL/6 background were obtained in our
laboratory by backcrossing the original strain into a C57BL/6
background for six generations and then screening the genomic DNA as
described (22). C57BL/6 mice were used as controls in the
experiments where these backcrossed IL6-KO mice were used.
Bacteria.
M. tuberculosis Erdman (batch 3) was grown
at 37°C on Löwenstein-Jensen medium or suspended in modified
Sauton medium enriched with 0.5% sodium pyruvate and 0.5% glucose
(3).
Reagents.
Monoclonal antibodies specific for individual
cytokines were purified from the ascitic fluid of nude mice injected
intraperitoneally (i.p.) with the following hybridomas: MP5-20F3
secreting a rat immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) specific for mouse IL-6 (DNAX,
Palo Alto, Calif.); S4B6 secreting a rat IgG2a specific for mouse IL-2
(American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.); 11B11 secreting a
rat IgG1 specific for mouse IL-4 (DNAX); JES5-2A5 secreting a rat IgG1
specific for mouse IL-10 (DNAX); C15.1 and C15.6, two hybridomas secreting rat IgG1 specific for mouse IL-12 (The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pa.); and GL113 secreting a rat IgG1 specific for
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Interleukin-6 and Interleukin-12 Participate in
Induction of a Type 1 Protective T-Cell Response during Vaccination
with a Tuberculosis Subunit Vaccine
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
)-secreting protective T cells following
immunization with a culture filtrate subunit vaccine against
Mycobacterium tuberculosis containing the adjuvant
dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA). Depletion of either
interleukin-6 (IL-6) or IL-12 with specific neutralizing antibodies
during vaccination reduced the priming of T cells for antigen-specific
proliferation and IFN-
secretion. Such reduction was also observed
in IL-6 gene-disrupted mice as compared to wild-type animals. IL-6 was
found to play a role in the initial differentiation of Th1 cells but
not in their expansion. The defect found after IL-6 depletion or in
IL-6-knockout mice was compensated by the inclusion of recombinant
mouse IL-12 in the vaccine. The induction of protective immunity
against an intravenous or an aerosol challenge with live, virulent
M. tuberculosis was markedly reduced by neutralizing either
IL-6 or IL-12 during immunization with the vaccine. Likewise, the
effects of IL-6 neutralization were partially reversed by including
IL-12 in the vaccine. Our data point to an important role of IL-6 and
IL-12 in the generation of cell-mediated immunity to tuberculosis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
) upon challenge with their cognate antigen (10, 16). Many adjuvants have been tested in animal models, but few are accepted for medical use in human beings.
Dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) is one of those adjuvants
already used in human vaccines (46; for a review,
see reference 18). It has already been demonstrated
that this adjuvant will promote a type 1 T-helper-cell response,
namely, when used in a tuberculosis subunit vaccine (24).
Several studies have also shown that emulsifying short-term-culture filtrate (ST-CF) proteins from M. tuberculosis in DDA will
lead to the development of an immune response that will give a
considerable level of protection against a subsequent challenge with
virulent tubercle bacilli (1, 24). However, the levels of
protection are often below those conferred by BCG in such murine
models. A possible way to improve the efficacy of such a vaccine would be to include cytokines that would boost the priming of the protective T cells. However, it is still unclear which cytokines intervene in the
development of a T-cell response in an immunized organism.
response as well as for
the generation of protective immunity against M. tuberculosis following such vaccination.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-galactosidase (DNAX). Ascites were delipidated with an organic solvent (1:4 mixture of 1-butanol and ethyl ether, respectively) and
were sterile filtered before purification on a recombinant protein G
agarose affinity column (Gibco BRL, Paisley, United Kingdom). Purified
antibodies were dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and
were sterile filtered.
Experimental vaccine. The experimental vaccine consisted of a mixture of ST-CF and DDA (Eastman Kodak Inc., Rochester, N.Y.). DDA was dissolved in bidistilled water, warmed in a water bath at 80°C for 10 min, cooled at room temperature, and mixed with an equal volume of ST-CF, so as to inject each animal with 250 µg of DDA and 50 µg of ST-CF in a total volume of 200 µl. Whenever recombinant IL-12 was used in the vaccine, it was added directly to the mixture of ST-CF and DDA in a dose of 0.5 µg per animal. Similarly, in some experiments, different doses of recombinant human IL-6 were given with the emulsion of antigen and DDA.
Immunizations. Mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) at the dorsal base of the tail, three times at weekly intervals. Each 200-µl dose of the vaccine was divided in two and then injected in two separate sites. Monoclonal antibodies specific for different cytokines or an isotype-matched control antibody with irrelevant specificity was administered i.p. on the day of the first and third immunizations, 2 to 3 h before the vaccine, in a dose of 2 mg per animal. In two experiments, only two administrations of the vaccine were done, 2 weeks apart from each other. In some experiments, recombinant cytokines were mixed with the vaccine given as described above.
Lymphocyte cultures.
Lymphocytes were obtained by preparing
single-cell suspensions either from lymph nodes (inguinal and iliac) or
from spleens by dispersion of the tissue through a sterilized stainless
steel mesh as described previously (4). Erythrocytes were
lysed with a solution containing 155 mM ammonium chloride and 10 mM
potassium bicarbonate buffer (3 ml of solution per spleen), and cells
were thoroughly washed. Isolated cells were cultured in microtiter wells, each containing 2 × 105 cells in a volume of
200 µl of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 × 10
5 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 IU of penicillin per ml, 100 µg of streptomycin per ml, 2 mM 2-glutamine, and 10% (vol/vol) fetal
calf serum. ST-CF was used to stimulate cells at a concentration of 4 µg/ml. Cell proliferation was investigated by pulsing cultures after 48 h of incubation (0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine per
well). After 18 to 20 h of incubation, plates were harvested and
processed for liquid scintillation counting. All tests were carried out
in triplicate. Supernatants from the cultures were also tested for the
determination of cytokines by harvesting parallel cultures after
48 h of incubation, except where indicated otherwise. For
the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay, cells were cultured
in 24-well plates, each well containing 4 × 106 cells
in a volume of 1 ml of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 × 10
5 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 IU of penicillin per ml, 100 µg of streptomycin per ml, 2 mM 2-glutamine, and 5% (vol/vol) fetal
calf serum.
Cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The cytokine
content in supernatants was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay by using the antibody pairs specific for IFN-
secreted by
hybridoma cell line R4-6A2 (American Type Culture Collection) as
coating antibody and by AN18 (DNAX) as detecting antibody. The
standards were made of recombinant IFN-
from Genzyme (Cambridge,
Mass.). The sensitivity of the assay was such that it could detect 80 pg of the cytokine per ml.
ELISPOT technique.
The ELISPOT assay was performed as
described by Muller et al. (31) with the minor modifications
introduced by Brandt et al. (9). Briefly, microtiter plates
were coated with 2.5 µg of monoclonal rat anti-mouse IFN-
(R4-6A2
cell line) per ml and were incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were
emptied and blocked for 2 h, followed by washing with PBS
containing 0.05% Tween 20. Analyses were conducted on cells pooled
from three mice. Cells were stimulated as described above with 4 µg
of ST-CF per ml of modified RPMI 1640 medium for 18 to 22 h and
were subsequently cultured for 6.5 h directly on the ELISPOT
plates. For each group of cultured cells, six serial twofold dilutions
were prepared with a starting concentration of 4 × 105 cells (every sample was run in duplicate). Cells were
removed by washing the plates, and the site of cytokine secretion was detected by biotin-labeled rat anti-mouse IFN-
monoclonal antibody (AN-18 cell line) and phosphatase-conjugated streptavidin. The enzyme
reaction was developed with 0.9 mg of
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (BCIP) (Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, Mo.) per ml of substrate buffer (0.74 mM MgCl2,
0.1% NaN3, 0.01% Triton X-405, and 9.6% 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol, pH 10.25) containing 0.6%
agarose. Blue spots were counted microscopically. The relationship
between the number of spots developed per well and the number of input cells per well was determined. Data are presented as the number of
spots per 4 × 105 spleen cells.
Infection and bacterial enumeration in organs. Groups of five mice were immunized s.c. with 5 × 104 CFU of BCG (Danish strain 1331). Other groups of five mice were immunized with three weekly doses of ST-CF (50 µg) in DDA (250 µg) with or without recombinant IL-12 (0.5 µg with each immunization, mixed in the vaccine). These latter groups received i.p. injections of either a control antibody with irrelevant specificity or anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-12 monoclonal antibodies with the first and third immunizations and 2 weeks after the last immunization (2 mg of antibody per dose). Mice were infected intravenously (i.v.) by injection with 0.1 ml of a solution containing 5 × 105 CFU of M. tuberculosis Erdman batch 3 per ml via the lateral vein of the tail 6 weeks after the last immunization, and the mice were sacrificed 2 weeks after infection. In some experiments, mice were subjected to an aerosol challenge with M. tuberculosis Erdman batch 3, leading to a pulmonary seeding which induced 15 to 20 lung granulomas 6 weeks after the last immunization, and these mice were sacrificed 6 weeks after infection. Animals were killed by cervical dislocation, and the organs were removed for bacterial enumeration. The organs were homogenized in PBS, and serial threefold dilutions were plated on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates. After 4 weeks of incubation at 37°C, the numbers of bacteria were determined. The resulting values are presented as means of log10 CFU per organ ± 1 standard deviation or as log10 units of resistance, corresponding to the difference between the log10 CFU in control (nonimmune) mice and the log10 CFU in the immunized groups.
Statistical analysis. The Student's t test using unpaired data and analysis of variance were used to compare data from the experiments.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to assess the requirements for the induction of
IFN-
-producing T cells, we initially immunized C57BL/6 mice with one, two, or three doses of the experimental vaccine consisting of 50 µg of ST-CF admixed with 0.25 mg of DDA given at weekly intervals. We
chose such a narrow period for immunization in order to be able to
modulate the response with neutralizing antibodies within the shortest
period of time possible. All monoclonal antibodies used were previously
tested in other models in our laboratory and were shown to be active in
depleting the cytokines. Three weeks after the last administration, the
animals were sacrificed, the spleens were collected, and spleen cell
responses were analyzed in vitro after stimulation with ST-CF proteins.
We saw that one immunization alone primed spleen cells for very low
levels of IFN-
secretion (441 ± 178 pg/ml) and for cell
proliferation (3.2-fold increase over nonimmunized cells), but either
two or three immunizations primed them for very high levels of
antigen-specific IFN-
production (16,107 ± 2,071 and
10,842 ± 1,650 pg/ml for two and three immunizations, respectively) and cell proliferation (4.9- and 4.2-fold increases in
proliferation as compared to nonimmune cells for two and three immunizations, respectively), confirming previous findings (1, 24). We therefore chose to use two or three immunizations in the
subsequent experiments.
The requirement for endogenously produced cytokines in the development
of an immune response characterized by priming for IFN-
release was
evaluated during the immunization procedure with the solution of ST-CF
and DDA. Mice were vaccinated three times at weekly intervals, and
cytokines were neutralized during the course of immunization by
administering specific monoclonal antibodies. The effects of these
antibodies were compared to those of a control monoclonal antibody
recognizing an irrelevant antigen,
-galactosidase. Several
independent experiments were performed, and they showed that
neutralization of either IL-2, IL-4, or IL-10 increased the
IFN-
-dominated response to variable degrees (Fig. 1). On the other hand, an inhibition of
the priming was observed as expected with the neutralization of IL-12
and, more interestingly, with the neutralization of IL-6 (Fig. 1). The
effects of the antibody treatments on the proliferative responses were
similar to the effects on the IFN-
responses, although to a smaller
degree. To confirm the observation that IL-6 and IL-12 were required
for the priming of IFN-
-secreting cells during immunization with the
solution of ST-CF and DDA, we performed multiple independent experiments where each of these cytokines was neutralized as described above. The data for the different experiments are summarized in Fig.
2, which shows the response of the
antibody-treated and immunized groups as compared to the immunized
groups treated with the irrelevant antibody as percent response to the
latter. Despite some variability, the neutralization of either IL-6 or
IL-12 markedly and consistently reduced IFN-
production, both with
cells from the spleen (statistically significant reductions in four out
of four experiments for IL-6 and in three out of four experiments for
IL-12) or from the draining lymph nodes (statistically significant
reductions in three out of four experiments for both IL-6 and IL-12).
That decrease in IFN-
was also accompanied by a decrease in the
proliferation of cells from the lymph nodes (statistically significant
reductions in three out of four experiments for IL-6 and in four out of
four experiments for IL-12) that was not so evident with the
splenocytes (statistically significant reductions in three out of four
experiments for both IL-6 and IL-12). The decrease in the
lymphoproliferative responses was less reproducible, most likely due to
the requirement for a more complete depletion of the cytokines which
may not have happened so consistently throughout all experiments.
|
|
As the data on IL-12 were expected, we concentrated our studies on the
more original observation that IL-6 is required for the priming of
IFN-
-secreting T cells. To test when IL-6 was required during in
vivo immunization, we administered IL-6-neutralizing antibodies at
different times during vaccination. As shown in Table
1 (experiment A), one dose of monoclonal
antibody given with the first immunization reduced the priming of lymph
node and splenic T cells for IFN-
secretion, whereas the late
administration of anti-IL-6 had the opposite effect in the lymph nodes,
leading to a small reduction in the priming of spleen cells. These
results suggested that IL-6 was not necessary for the responses of
already primed cells. This was confirmed when we stimulated immune
spleen cells in vitro and studied the effects of antibodies
neutralizing this cytokine and compared these effects to those obtained
by IL-12 neutralization. Neutralization of IL-12 had little effect, whereas the neutralization of IL-6 significantly enhanced IFN-
production by immune splenocytes stimulated with the specific antigen
(P < 0.05) as well as increased the frequency of
IFN-
-producing cells (P < 0.05) (Fig.
3). We also tested whether in vivo IL-10 neutralization offset the defect in IFN-
priming observed in mice
whose IL-6 had been neutralized during the immunization, since IL6-KO
mice have been shown to be more susceptible to candidiasis and to have
higher IL-10 responses underlying such susceptibility to infection
(41). As shown in Table 1 (experiment B), that was not the
case. While IL-10 neutralization alone led to a slight increase in the
IFN-
secretion of lymph node and spleen cells as compared to control
animals, it did not affect the reduced IFN-
response in animals
treated with anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibodies during immunization (no
statistically significant differences were found between those two
groups). Similar data were obtained for the proliferative responses
(data not shown).
|
|
Since some antibodies against IL-6 have been demonstrated to enhance
its half-life in vivo instead of blocking its activity (17),
we decided to confirm that the results observed with the monoclonal
antibody used in the previous experiments were indeed due to a
neutralization of the activity of IL-6 and not due to its increased
bioavailability. IL6-KO mice and control mice of similar genetic
backgrounds (C57BL/6) were immunized two times with ST-CF in DDA at a
2-week interval, and then their spleens and iliac and inguinal lymph
nodes were collected for stimulation in vitro 3 weeks after the second
immunization. As shown in Fig. 4,
splenocytes from IL6-KO mice were unable to produce significant amounts
of IFN-
, and their cell proliferation was decreased when compared to
the control animals (P < 0.01 for both spleen and lymph node cells). Similar data were obtained with the lymph node cell
preparations (not shown). In several different experiments, the number
of cells isolated from the lymph nodes of IL6-KO mice were 10.6 to
75.4% lower than in wild-type animals, and such lower numbers were
seen among all lymphocyte subpopulations (data not shown). We thus
confirmed the requirement for the endogenous production of IL-6 in the
priming of IFN-
-secreting T cells after immunization with the
mixture of ST-CF and DDA. In order to try to recover the defect
observed in the IL6-KO mice, we performed immunizations in which
different levels of recombinant IL-6 were included in the vaccine. In a
first experiment, the inclusion of 0.5, 5, or 30 µg of recombinant
human IL-6 in each one of the three doses of the vaccine failed to
complement the genetic deficiency (data not shown). We therefore gave
three 30-µg doses of IL-6, on the day of the first immunization and
in the following two days (for a total dosage of 90 µg), with no
further administration of IL-6 with the second dose of the vaccine.
With this protocol, we recovered the defect in IFN-
priming observed
in the IL6-KO mice (Fig. 4A). The secretion of IFN-
was
significantly increased as compared to the immunized IL6-KO group
(P < 0.05) as well as to the immunized wild-type
controls (P < 0.05). Lymphoproliferation in IL6-KO
cells was significantly increased by such treatment (P < 0.05).
|
An alternative to boost protective immunity after immunization with
subunit vaccines involves the inclusion of IL-12 in the vaccine
(6, 24, 45). We thus decided to test whether the defect in
IL-6 could be compensated by IL-12. Preliminary experiments showed that
either one or three administrations of IL-12 with the vaccine enhanced
the IFN-
and the lymphoproliferative responses in wild-type mice
(data not shown). To analyze the effect of IL-12 administered with the
vaccine in the IL6-KO mice, these animals were immunized three times
with ST-CF in DDA plus IL-12 (one dose of the cytokine per
immunization). The results (Fig. 4B) showed that the administration of
IL-12 with ST-CF in DDA overcame the inability of IL6-KO mice to
produce IFN-
in response to this vaccine (P < 0.01)
and that such cytokine secretion was even increased relative to control
mice (P < 0.01 for spleen cells and P < 0.05 for lymph node cells). ELISPOT assays showed that the
frequency of cells able to produce IFN-
was also increased in the
animals that received the ST-CF-DDA-IL-12 mixture (a 23-fold increase as compared to the immunized IL6-KO mice, corresponding to 10 times the
frequency observed in immunized control mice), suggesting that IL-12
increased the number of IFN-
-secreting cells in these mice rather
than IFN-
secretion of the cytokine on a per cell basis.
To evaluate the roles of IL-6 and IL-12 in the induction of protective
immunity by vaccination with ST-CF in DDA, the effects of the
neutralization of these cytokines during immunization were tested as
before by administering neutralizing monoclonal antibodies during
immunization with three doses of the vaccine. These groups were
compared to groups of animals immunized with ST-CF in DDA and given an
irrelevant antibody as well as with a group immunized with BCG, the
standard vaccine. Mice were then challenged with live, virulent
M. tuberculosis, either i.v. or with an aerosol, 6 weeks
after the last immunization. After i.v. challenge, bacterial enumeration was performed in the liver, where most of the inoculum is
trapped, and in the lung, the preferential target for M. tuberculosis proliferation. The results are shown as the
differences between the geometric means of CFU in the nonimmune mice
and those in each of the immunized groups of mice (Table
2). In the liver, the vaccine offered
less protection than BCG (P = 0.01), and its protective
efficacy was reduced by neutralizing IL-6 (P < 0.05) and was ablated by neutralizing IL-12. In the lung, the protection afforded by vaccine was slightly superior to that afforded by BCG
(P < 0.05), and again, neutralization of either IL-6
or IL-12 during immunization led to a reduction in its protective
ability (P < 0.01 for both). In both organs, the
inclusion of recombinant IL-12 increased the efficacy of the vaccine in
control mice, but this increase was statistically significant only in
the liver (P < 0.05). The addition of IL-12 to the
vaccine compensated for the decrease induced by the anti-IL-6 treatment
(P < 0.01 for both organs).
|
In mice that were similarly treated but were challenged with an aerosol, bacterial enumeration was performed in the target organ, in the lung, and in the spleen as a target for dissemination (Table 2). Protection induced by the vaccine was similar to that of BCG in both organs (no statistically significant differences were found). Neutralization of either IL-6 or IL-12 ablated vaccine-induced protection. The inclusion of recombinant IL-12 in the vaccine increased the efficacy of the vaccine in the lung (P < 0.05) and compensated for the lack of IL-6 in the spleen (P < 0.01), although not in the lung.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IL-12 is well known to play a pivotal role in the priming of
Th1-type immune responses, possibly aided by other cytokines, such as
IL-18, IL-1, and tumor necrosis factor alpha. The precise role of IL-6
in T-cell differentiation is far from clarified. Deficient priming of
IFN-
responses in the absence of IL-6 was reported during infections
by L. monocytogenes or M. tuberculosis (23,
25-27). However, others have shown that IL-6 can promote Th2
responses through the induction of IL-4 (37). Here we have shown that IL-6 was required for the priming of IFN-
-secreting T
cells during immunization with a subunit vaccine against tuberculosis previously shown to promote protective immunity to tuberculosis in a
similar model (24). This was found using two different approaches: by depleting IL-6 during immunization using IL6-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and by performing experiments in
IL6-KO mice. This excluded the possibility of the antibodies chaperoning the cytokine instead of ablating its activity. IL-6 was
required not only for the priming of IFN-
-producing T cells but also
for the induction of protective T cells, highlighting the role of
IFN-
as a fundamental molecule in protective immunity to
tuberculosis. The deficiency in IL-6 led to reductions in both responses similar to the depletion of IL-12. We were able to recover the defect in IL6-KO mice by administering recombinant IL-6 early in
vaccination and by adding recombinant IL-12 to the vaccine. In
addition, IL-12 was effective in increasing the priming of T cells for
IFN-
secretion in normal mice and showed small but statistically
significant effects in increasing the protective immunity granted by
the vaccine. These results support the possibility of using IL-12 as an
adjuvant in vaccines aimed at promoting cell-mediated immunity. This
would be even more important if situations of deficient IL-6 production
were found, either because of individual deficiencies or because of
intrinsic properties of given adjuvants.
In this work, we found a high variability in the priming of cells for
the secretion of IFN-
. This effect has been consistently observed
for this type of immunization in both of our two laboratories. Although
the reason for such variability is not clear, some explanations can be
envisaged. We know that the variability is not dependent on the batch
of tuberculosis antigen, but the fact that the vaccine (i.e., ST-CF
plus adjuvant) is prepared fresh for each inoculation could account for
some variability in its immunizing activity between experiments.
Alternatively, this immunization procedure might be very sensitive to
environmental conditions (e.g., slight variations in the commensal
flora of the animals).
Although the mechanism of the defect(s) in T-cell development in the
absence of IL-6 is still unclear, several hypotheses are being tested.
A simple explanation for our results could be that IL-6 is a cofactor
for the development of the immune T cells that produce IFN-
and
mediate protection against the tuberculosis infection. The number of
lymphocytes isolated from the lymph nodes of IL6-KO mice after
immunization was consistently lower than the number isolated from
immunized control animals. This could suggest that IL-6 was required
for cell proliferation. A direct role of IL-6 in the proliferation or
differentiation of T cells has been documented by several groups. IL-6
was shown to promote the proliferation of human T cells in response to
CD2 ligation (15, 21, 28) or after mitogen stimulation
(49) and to be involved in the generation of cytolytic T
cells (30, 35, 36, 39). In our hands, and in keeping with
previous observations by others (51), IL-6 reduced the
responses of differentiated T cells as its neutralization in the
cultures augmented IFN-
production. However, it is still possible
that IL-6 is mostly required for the initial proliferation and/or
differentiation of T cells. In this study, only an early in vivo
depletion of IL-6 led to the inhibition of priming for IFN-
secretion. In contrast, late depletions had the opposite effect,
mimicking our in vitro experiments. Also, only the early addition of
IL-6 to the vaccine could lead to the recovery of the defect found in the IL6-KO mice. In contrast, a similar amount of IL-6 given with all
immunizations was without effect. Our data are therefore consistent with an important role for IL-6 in the early expansion of immune T
cells. Somehow, this requirement is overcome by IL-12 with regard to
the IFN-
responses but is not overcome in terms of the proliferative potential of the immune cells (Fig. 4). Consistent with these interpretations, Vink et al. (52) found that the effect of
IL-6 on the in vitro proliferation of mitogen-stimulated murine T cells was critical for the initiation of the response but not for its maintenance. Also, Joseph et al. (20) have recently reported that IL-6 acted on purified murine T cells by promoting their proliferation and that such an effect was most important with naive
rather than differentiated T cells. They also found that IL-6 promoted
cytokine production in fully differentiated Th1 cells, whereas it
decreased IFN-
secretion in differentiating T cells, showing that
IL-6 may have different functions on T cells according to their
differentiation status, thereby clarifying the contradictory data
previously reported in the literature. In our studies, the overall
effects of the treatments on the proliferative responses were generally
much less important than the effects on IFN-
priming. This suggests
that antigen-specific T cells that lack the ability to secrete IFN-
may be induced in the absence of the two cytokines, IL-6 and IL-12.
Alternative mechanisms explaining the effects of IL-6 range from chemokine responses interfering with the recruitment of antigen-presenting cells and other immune cells (8, 42) to a role for neutrophils in T-cell priming (11, 41) or a role for the acute-phase reactants (22) or glucocorticoid metabolism (43) in the response to the vaccine.
In summary, we have found a major role for both IL-6 and IL-12 in the
generation of protective immunity mediated by IFN-
-secreting T cells
following immunization with a subunit vaccine. Although the role of
IL-12 seems to confirm its expected role as a major Th1 inducer, the
mechanism involved in the action of IL-6 is not clear. Finally, the
defect in IL-6-deficient mice could be overcome by IL-12, showing that
this latter cytokine is an important candidate as an adjuvant in
vaccines promoting cell-mediated immunity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Commission of the European Community's STD3 program (contract TS3*-CT/94-0313) and INCO/DC program (contract ERBIC18CT970254). I.S.L. receives a fellowship from the PRAXIS XXI program (Lisbon, Portugal).
We are grateful to M. Kopf for supplying breeders of IL6-KO mice, to the Genetics Institute for their gift of recombinant mouse IL-12, and to Ares-Serono for their gift of recombinant human IL-6.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology of Infection, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-Porto, Portugal. Phone: 351.2.6074952. Fax: 351.2.6099157. E-mail: rappelb{at}ibmc.up.pt.
Editor: R. N. Moore
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Andersen, P.
1994.
Effective vaccination of mice against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection with a soluble mixture of secreted mycobacterial proteins.
Infect. Immun.
62:2536-2544 |
| 2. | Andersen, P. 1997. Host responses and antigens involved in protective immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 45:115-131[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Andersen, P.,
D. Askgaard,
L. Ljungqvist,
J. Bennedsen, and I. Heron.
1991.
Proteins released from Mycobacterium tuberculosis during growth.
Infect. Immun.
59:1905-1910 |
| 4. |
Andersen, P.,
D. Askgaard,
L. Ljungqvist,
M. W. Bentzon, and I. Heron.
1991.
T-cell proliferative response to antigens secreted from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun.
59:1558-1563 |
| 5. | Appelberg, R., A. G. Castro, J. Pedrosa, and P. Minóprio. 1994. Role of interleukin 6 in the induction of protective T cells during mycobacterial infections in mice. Immunology 82:361-364[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Baldwin, S. L.,
C. D'Souza,
A. D. Roberts,
P. Kelly,
A. A. Frank,
M. A. Lui,
J. B. Ulmer,
K. Huygen,
D. M. McMurray, and I. M. Orme.
1998.
Evaluation of new vaccines in the mouse and guinea pig model of tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2951-2959 |
| 7. |
Bermudez, L. E.,
M. Wu,
M. Petrofsky, and L. S. Young.
1992.
Interleukin-6 antagonizes tumor necrosis factor-mediated mycobacteriostatic and mycobactericidal activities in macrophages.
Infect. Immun.
60:4245-4252 |
| 8. |
Biswas, P.,
F. Delfanti,
S. Bernasconi,
M. Cota,
N. Polentarutti,
A. Mantovani,
A. Lazzarin,
S. Sozzani, and G. Poli.
1998.
Interleukin-6 induces monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in the U937 cell line.
Blood
91:258-265 |
| 9. | Brandt, L., T. Oettinger, A. Holm, A. B. Andersen, and P. Andersen. 1996. Key epitopes on the ESAT-6 antigen recognized in mice during the recall of protective immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 157:3527-3533[Abstract]. |
| 10. |
Cooper, A. M.,
D. K. Dalton,
T. A. Stewart,
J. P. Griffin,
D. G. Russell, and I. M. Orme.
1993.
Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon gene-disrupted mice.
J. Exp. Med.
178:2243-2247 |
| 11. | Dalrymple, S. A., L. A. Lucian, R. Slattery, T. McNeil, D. M. Aud, S. Fuchino, F. Lee, and R. Murray. 1995. Interleukin-6-deficient mice are highly susceptible to Listeria monocytogenes infection: correlation with inefficient neutrophilia. Infect. Immun. 63:2262-2268[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Denis, M., and E. O. Gregg. 1990. Recombinant tumour necrosis factor-alpha decreases whereas recombinant interleukin-6 increases growth of a virulent strain of Mycobacterium avium in human macrophages. Immunology 71:139-141[Medline]. |
| 13. | Dolin, P. J., M. C. Raviglione, and A. Kochi. 1994. Global tuberculosis incidence and mortality during 1990-2000. Bull. W. H. O. 72:213-220[Medline]. |
| 14. | Dooley, S. W., W. R. Jarvis, W. J. Martone, and D. E. Snider. 1992. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann. Intern. Med. 117:257-259. |
| 15. | Endler-Jobst, B., B. Schraven, B. Hutmacher, and S. C. Meuer. 1991. Human T cell responses to IL-1 and IL-6 are dependent on signals mediated through CD2. J. Immunol. 146:1736-1742[Abstract]. |
| 16. |
Flynn, J. L.,
J. Chan,
K. J. Triebold,
D. K. Dalton,
T. A. Stewart, and B. R. Bloom.
1993.
An essential role for interferon in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.
J. Exp. Med.
178:2249-2254 |
| 17. | Heremans, H., C. Dillen, W. Put, J. van Damme, and A. Billiau. 1992. Protective effect of anti-interleukin (IL)-6 antibody against endotoxin associated with paradoxically increased IL-6 levels. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2395-2401[Medline]. |
| 18. | Hilgers, L. A. T., and H. Snippe. 1992. DDA as an immunological adjuvant. Res. Immunol. 143:494-503[Medline]. |
| 19. | Hubbard, R. D., C. M. Flory, and F. M. Collins. 1992. Immunization of mice with mycobacterial culture filtrate proteins. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 87:94-98[Medline]. |
| 20. | Joseph, S. B., K. T. Miner, and M. Croft. 1998. Augmentation of naive, Th1 and Th2 effector CD4 responses by IL-6, IL-1 and TNF. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:277-289[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Kasahara, Y.,
T. Miyawaki,
K. Kato,
H. Kanegame,
A. Yachie,
T. Yokoi, and N. Taniguchi.
1990.
Role of interleukin 6 for differential responsiveness of naive and memory CD4+ T cells in CD2-mediated activation.
J. Exp. Med.
172:1419-1424 |
| 22. | Kopf, M., H. Baumann, G. Freer, M. Freudenberg, M. Lamers, T. Kishimoto, R. Zinkernagel, H. Bluethmann, and G. Kohler. 1994. Impaired immune and acute-phase responses in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Nature 368:339-342[Medline]. |
| 23. | Ladel, C. H., C. Blum, A. Dreher, K. Reifenberg, M. Kopf, and S. H. E. Kaufmann. 1997. Lethal tuberculosis in interleukin-6-deficient mutant mice. Infect. Immun. 65:4843-4849[Abstract]. |
| 24. | Lindblad, E. B., M. J. Elhay, R. Silva, R. Appelberg, and P. Andersen. 1997. Adjuvant modulation of immune responses to tuberculosis sub-unit vaccines. Infect. Immun. 65:623-629[Abstract]. |
| 25. |
Liu, Z., and C. Cheers.
1993.
The cellular source of interleukin-6 during Listeria infection.
Infect. Immun.
61:2626-2631 |
| 26. | Liu, Z., R. J. Simpson, and C. Cheers. 1994. Role of IL-6 in activation of T cells for acquired cellular resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. J. Immunol. 152:5375-5380[Abstract]. |
| 27. | Liu, Z., R. J. Simpson, and C. Cheers. 1995. Role of interleukin-6 in T-cell activation during primary and secondary infection with Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 63:2790-2792[Abstract]. |
| 28. | Lorré, K., J. van Damme, J. Verwilghen, M. L. Baroja, and J. L. Ceuppens. 1990. IL-6 is an accessory signal in the alternative CD2-mediated pathway of T cell activation. J. Immunol. 144:4681-4687[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Micallef, M. J.,
T. Ohtsuki,
K. Kohno,
F. Tanabe,
S. Ushio,
M. Namba,
T. Tanimoto,
K. Torigoe,
M. Fujii,
M. Ikeda,
S. Fukuda, and M. Kurimoto.
1996.
Interferon- -inducing factor enhances T helper 1 cytokine production by stimulated human T cells: synergism with interleukin-12 for interferon- production.
Eur. J. Immunol.
26:1647-1651[Medline].
|
| 30. | Ming, J. E., R. M. Steinman, and A. Granelli-Piperno. 1992. IL-6 enhances the generation of cytolytic T lymphocytes in the allogeneic mixed leucocyte reaction. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 89:148-153[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Muller, I.,
P. Kropf,
J. A. Louis, and G. Milon.
1994.
Expansion of gamma interferon-producing CD8+ T cells following secondary infection of mice immune to Leishmania major.
Infect. Immun.
62:2575 |
| 32. |
Okamura, H.,
H. Tsutsui,
T. Komatsu,
M. Yutsudo,
A. Hakura,
T. Tanimoto,
K. Torigoe,
T. Okura,
Y. Nukada,
K. Hattori,
K. Akita,
M. Namba,
F. Tanabe,
K. Konishi,
S. Fukuda, and M. Kurimoto.
1995.
Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN- production by T cells.
Nature
378:88-90[Medline].
|
| 33. | Orme, I. M., P. Andersen, and W. H. Boom. 1993. T cell response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 167:1481-1497[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Pal, P. G., and M. Horwitz.
1992.
Immunization with extracellular proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces cell-mediated immune responses and substantial protective immunity in a guinea pig model of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Infect. Immun.
60:4781-4792 |
| 35. | Quentmeier, H., J. Klaucke, P. F. Muhlradt, and H. G. Drexler. 1992. Role of IL-6, IL-2, and IL-4 in the in vitro induction of cytolytic T cells. J. Immunol. 149:3316-3320[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Renauld, J.-C., A. Vink, and J. van Snick. 1989. Accessory signals in murine cytolytic T cell responses. Dual requirement for IL-1 and IL-6. J. Immunol. 143:1894-1898[Abstract]. |
| 37. |
Rincón, M.,
J. Anguita,
T. Nakamura,
E. Fikrig, and R. A. Flavell.
1997.
Interleukin (IL)-6 directs the differentiation of IL-4-producing CD4+ T cells.
J. Exp. Med.
185:461-469 |
| 38. |
Robinson, D.,
K. Shibuya,
A. Mui,
F. Zonin,
E. Murphy,
T. Sana,
S. B. Hartley,
S. Menon,
R. Kastelein,
F. Bazan, and A. O'Garra.
1997.
IGIF does not drive Th1 development but synergizes with IL-12 for interferon- production and activates IRAK and NF B.
Immunity
7:571-581[Medline].
|
| 39. | Rogers, L. A., A. Zlotnik, F. Lee, and K. Shortman. 1991. Lymphokine requirements for the development of specific cytotoxic T cells from single precursors. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1069-1072[Medline]. |
| 40. |
Rogge, L.,
L. Barberis-Maino,
M. Biffi,
N. Passini,
D. H. Presky,
U. Gubler, and F. Sinigaglia.
1997.
Selective expression of an interleukin-12 receptor component by human T helper 1 cells.
J. Exp. Med.
185:825-831 |
| 41. |
Romani, L.,
A. Mencacci,
E. Cenci,
R. Spaccapelo,
C. Toniatti,
P. Puccetti,
F. Bistoni, and V. Poli.
1996.
Impaired neutrophil response and CD4+ T helper cell 1 development in interleukin 6-deficient mice infected with Candida albicans.
J. Exp. Med.
183:1345-1355 |
| 42. | Romano, M., M. Sironi, C. Toniatti, N. Polentarutti, P. Fruscella, P. Ghezzi, R. Faggioni, W. Luini, V. van Hinsbergh, S. Sozzani, F. Bussolino, V. Poli, G. Ciliberto, and A. Mantovani. 1997. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity 6:315-325[Medline]. |
| 43. |
Ruzek, M. C.,
A. H. Miller,
S. M. Opal,
B. D. Pearce, and C. A. Biron.
1997.
Characterization of early cytokine responses and an interleukin (IL)-6-dependent pathway of endogenous glucocorticoid induction during murine cytomegalovirus infection.
J. Exp. Med.
185:1185-1192 |
| 44. | Shiratsuchi, H., J. L. Johnson, and J. J. Ellner. 1991. Bidirectional effects of cytokines on the growth of Mycobacterium avium within human monocytes. J. Immunol. 146:3165-3170[Abstract]. |
| 45. |
Silva, R. A.,
T. F. Pais, and R. Appelberg.
1998.
Evaluation of interleukin 12 in immunotherapy and vaccine design in experimental Mycobacterium avium infections.
J. Immunol.
161:5578-5585 |
| 46. | Stanfield, J. P., D. Gall, and P. M. Bracken. 1973. Single-dose antenatal tetanus immunization. Lancet ii:215-219. |
| 47. |
Szabo, S. J.,
A. S. Dighe,
U. Gubler, and K. M. Murphy.
1997.
Regulation of the interleukin (IL)-12R 2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells.
J. Exp. Med.
185:817-824 |
| 48. | Takeda, K., H. Tsutsui, T. Yoshimoto, O. Adachi, N. Yoshida, T. Kishimoto, H. Okamura, K. Nakanishi, and S. Akira. 1998. Defective NK cell activity and Th1 response in IL-18-deficient mice. Immunity 8:383-390[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Tosato, G., and S. E. Pike.
1988.
Interferon- 2/interleukin 6 is a co-stimulant for human T lymphocytes.
J. Immunol.
141:1556-1562[Abstract].
|
| 50. | Trinchieri, G. 1995. Interleukin-12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen-specific adaptive immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13:251-276[Medline]. |
| 51. | van Heyningen, T. K., H. L. Collins, and D. G. Russell. 1997. IL-6 produced by macrophages infected with Mycobacterium species suppresses T cell responses. J. Immunol. 158:330-337[Abstract]. |
| 52. | Vink, A., C. Uyttenhove, P. Wauters, and J. van Snick. 1990. Accessory factors involved in murine T cell activation. Distinct roles of interleukin-6, interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:1-6[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»