Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, November 1999, p. 6008-6018, Vol. 67, No. 11
Department of Microbiology, University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
752351; Oklahoma State University,
Stillwater, Oklahoma 740782; and Center
for Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Connecticut Health
Center, Farmington, Connecticut 060303
Received 8 July 1999/Returned for modification 13 August
1999/Accepted 23 August 1999
We previously reported on the existence of a family of lipoprotein
genes, designated 2.9 lipoprotein genes, encoded in at least seven
versions on the circular (supercoiled) cp32 and cp18 plasmids of
Borrelia burgdorferi 297. A distinguishing feature of the
2.9 lipoproteins were highly similar signal sequences but variable
mature polypeptides that segregated into two antigenic classes. Further
screenings of B. burgdorferi 297 genomic libraries led to
the identification of three additional 2.9 lipoprotein genes, renamed
herein mlp, for multicopy lipoprotein genes. Computer analyses and immunoblotting revealed that Mlp-9 segregated with the
antigenic class I lipoproteins, whereas Mlp-8 and Mlp-10 were members
of class II. Northern blotting showed that all three of the
mlp genes were expressed when B. burgdorferi
was cultivated in vitro at 34°C, although mlp-9 and
mlp-10 transcripts were expressed at very low levels.
Additional combined immunoblotting and comparative reverse
transcription-PCR analyses performed on borreliae cultivated in vitro
at 23, 34, or 37°C indicated that although Mlp-8 was substantially
more abundant than Mlp-9 or Mlp-10, all three of the mlp
genes were upregulated during B. burgdorferi replication at
37°C. Expression of the same three lipoproteins was further enhanced
upon growth of the spirochetes within dialysis membrane chambers (DMCs)
implanted intraperitoneally in rats (i.e., spirochetes in a mammalian
host-adapted state), suggesting that temperature alone did not account
for maximal upregulation of the mlp genes. That certain
mlp genes are likely expressed during the growth of
B. burgdorferi in mammalian tissues was supported by
findings of antibodies against all three Mlp lipoproteins in mice after challenge with Ixodes scapularis nymphs harboring B. burgdorferi 297. The combined data suggest that as opposed to
being differentially expressed in any reciprocal fashion (e.g.,
OspA/OspC), at least three mlp genes are simultaneously
upregulated by temperature (37°C) and some other mammalian host
factor(s). The findings have importance not only for understanding
alternative modes of differential antigen expression by B. burgdorferi but also for assessing whether one or more of the Mlp
lipoproteins represent new candidate vaccinogens for Lyme disease.
Lyme disease, a multisystem
infectious disorder caused by the spirochetal bacterium Borrelia
burgdorferi (34), is the most prevalent arthropod-borne
disease in the United States (7). In 1996, almost 17,000 cases of Lyme disease were reported to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, an increase of 41% above 1995 and a record high
(7). Thus, Lyme disease continues to represent a significant
public health problem (7).
The zoonotic life cycle of B. burgdorferi is complex and
depends on horizontal transmission between immature ticks and mice; humans are accidental hosts (34). During nymphal feeding,
profound changes occur in the antigenic repertoire of B. burgdorferi as it migrates from the midgut and salivary glands of
the tick into mammalian tissue (13, 32). The paradigm for
this phenomenon is the inverse relationship between the expression of
OspA and OspC (27, 32). Such findings coincide with
additional observations that other B. burgdorferi antigens
are expressed predominantly during growth either in vitro (ostensibly
analogous to the tick environment) or in vivo (i.e., during mammalian
infection) (1, 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 25, 29, 30, 38, 40,
42). Interestingly, these differentially expressed antigens are
virtually all plasmid encoded, underscoring the importance of plasmids
for the organism's zoonotic cycle and for virulence expression.
The 2.9 locus, a ca. 3-kb segment of DNA encoding a number of genes on
the circular (supercoiled) cp32 and cp18 plasmids, was first reported
to exist in at least seven versions in B. burgdorferi 297 (29). As originally described (29), the 5' end of
each 2.9 locus contains four tandem open reading frames (ORFs),
designated ABCD. Just downstream of these four ORFs is
another ORF encoding a highly repeated (rep) region; the
putative directions of transcription for rep were designated
rep+ and rep While physiological functions have not been ascribed to any of the
proteins encoded within the 2.9 loci, Guina and Oliver (19)
reported on a comparable orfA (blyA) gene within
an ABCD operon of B. burgdorferi B31 that encodes
a hemolysin-like protein. The same authors (19) also
described an orfB (blyB) gene that encodes a
13-kDa protein which stabilizes the hemolytic activity of the
orfA gene product. Regarding lipoprotein genes, Theisen (41) reported on the existence in B. afzelii,
B. garinii, and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto DK7
of a 33-kDa lipoprotein (NlpH), encoded on a supercoiled plasmid, which
binds Congo red, a property associated with bacterial virulence and the
binding of hemin; the nlpH orthologs are highly homologous
with the class I Mlp lipoproteins of B. burgdorferi 297. Furthermore, the DNA sequences flanking nlpH include a
repetitive region (i.e., rep) remarkably similar to the
genetic organization of the 2.9 loci of B. burgdorferi 297. Finally, protease sensitivity experiments suggested that NlpH is
surface-exposed in B. afzelii. These combined findings suggest that (i) one or more of the 2.9 lipoproteins may be potential targets for bactericidal antibodies (i.e., vaccine candidates) and (ii)
the 2.9 lipoprotein genes may be widely distributed among the various
B. burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies. Regarding other 2.9 locus genes, Gilmore and Mbow (18) identified in B. burgdorferi B31 a rev gene product that is expressed in
infected (tick-inoculated) mice as well as in the sera of human Lyme
disease patients, suggesting that a rev gene product may
play an important role for spirochete survival during the mammalian
phase of infection.
Herein we describe the identification and characterization of three
additional 2.9 loci and provide evidence that their mlp genes are all upregulated during the growth of B. burgdorferi in vitro at 37°C as well as when B. burgdorferi replicates in dialysis membrane chambers implanted
intraperitoneally in rats (i.e., during a mammalian host-adapted
state). The findings have importance not only for understanding the
regulation of differential antigen expression by B. burgdorferi but ultimately for assessing whether one or more of
the 2.9 lipoproteins represent new candidate vaccinogens for Lyme disease.
Bacterial strains.
Low-passage, virulent B. burgdorferi strain 297 was described previously (20).
For in vitro cultivation, spirochetes from not more than three serial
passages were cultivated at 34°C in complete BSK-H medium (Sigma
Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) (28). For temperature shift
experiments, spirochetes were first cultivated at 23°C until cell
densities reached approximately 5 × 106 cells per ml.
The culture then was divided and diluted 1,000-fold with fresh
(prewarmed) BSK-H medium; cultures were further incubated at either 23, 34, or 37°C. Spirochetes were harvested at the mid-logarithmic phase
(ca. 107 cells per ml) for further analyses. To obtain
B. burgdorferi in the mammalian host-adapted state,
spirochetes were cultivated in dialysis membrane chambers (DMCs)
implanted in rat peritoneal cavities as described by Akins et al.
(1) except that BSK-H medium was used in place of BSK II
medium. To standardize total B. burgdorferi proteins among
differing spirochete samples, total protein was determined by the
bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.).
Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) was
used as the cloning host and was cultivated either in yeast-tryptone
broth or on yeast-tryptone agar supplemented with 100 µg of
ampicillin per ml.
Tick rearing, infection, and infestation.
Four BALB/c mice
each were inoculated with 2.5 × 105 B. burgdorferi 297 spirochetes. Half of the cells were administered
by intraperitoneal injection, and the remaining half were given via subcutaneous injection over the sternum. To ensure infection, 2 weeks
later, ear punch biopsies were obtained (33) and cultured in
BSK II medium supplemented with rifampin (50 µg/ml) and amphotericin B (25 µg/ml); cultures were examined by dark-field microscopy daily
after the third day for the presence of spirochetes.
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification, Characterization, and Expression of
Three New Members of the Borrelia burgdorferi Mlp (2.9)
Lipoprotein Gene Family
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
. In at
least one 2.9 locus, the rep+ region is replaced
by an ORF in the opposite orientation designated rev.
Further downstream of the rep/rev region is usually a single lipoprotein gene, except in one instance where two tandem lipoprotein genes have been noted (29). The 2.9 lipoprotein genes encode highly similar signal sequences but variable mature polypeptides that
segregate into two antigenic classes based on size, hydrophilicity, sequence similarities, and reactivity with polyclonal antisera. These
lipoproteins are renamed herein Mlp, for multicopy lipoproteins.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
90% infection were used in this study.
Identification of E. coli clones harboring B. burgdorferi 2.9 loci. A genomic DNA library of low-passage (virulent) B. burgdorferi 297 DNA (29) was screened by hybridization with a 32P-labeled 2.9orfD probe as previously described (29). Plasmid DNAs were then isolated from hybridizing clones and were subjected to DNA sequence analysis (below).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization
analyses.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and Southern
hybridization analyses were performed as described previously (20,
29). Methods for the isolation of B. burgdorferi
genomic DNA and supercoiled plasmid DNA were as reported elsewhere
(29). Hybridization probes for ospC and
lipoprotein genes mlp-8, mlp-9, and
mlp-10 are listed in Table 1.
The specificities of the mlp gene probes were confirmed by
performing dot blot Southern hybridization analyses (Fig. 3A). In these
assays, 50-ng aliquots of purified plasmid DNAs harboring each
mlp gene were first loaded into a 96-well transfer device; plasmid DNAs were UV cross-linked to nylon membranes. Nylon membranes were then cut into strips such that each strip contained all 10 mlp genes for Southern hybridizations with individual
radioactive oligonucleotide probes.
|
Northern blot analysis. Total RNA was isolated from B. burgdorferi 297 by using an Ultraspec RNA Isolation System (Biotecx, Houston, Tex.) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Northern blot analysis was carried out as described previously (29). The hybridization probes for the flagellin gene (flaB) and the mlp-8, mlp-9, and mlp-10 genes are listed in Table 1.
RT-PCR. Spirochetes were harvested at the mid-logarithmic phase of growth (107 cells per ml) from either in vitro cultures or DMCs in rats. Total RNA was isolated as for Northern blot experiments. Extracted RNA (10 µg) was incubated with 10 U of RQ1 DNase I (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) at 37°C for 3 h. RNA was extracted once with phenol-chloroform and precipitated with cold 100% ethanol. RNA pellets were then suspended in 50 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. DNase treatment was repeated if DNA contamination was detected after PCR analysis. One-step reverse transcription-PCRs (RT-PCRs) reactions were performed with the Titan RT-PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The 20-µl reaction mixtures included reaction buffer, 5 U of RNase inhibitor, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.8 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.3 µM each oligonucleotide primer, and 1 µl of enzyme mixture. For results shown in Fig. 4, 100 ng of DNA-free total RNA was used; for results shown in Fig. 8, 10-fold serial dilutions of RNA were used in the reactions. The concentrations of total RNA used varied depending on the relative abundances of the transcripts; for detection of flaB and ospA transcripts, 1 pg to 1 ng of total RNA was used, whereas 100-fold-greater amounts of RNA (100 pg to 100 ng) were used in reactions to detect mlp-8, mlp-9, and mlp-10 transcripts. cDNA syntheses were performed by incubating all reaction mixtures at 50°C for 30 min. Amplifications were carried out in a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp 2400 Thermocycler set for the following parameters: 94°C for 3 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 50°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 30 s, with increments of 5 s for each cycle. For all RT-PCRs, a negative control was performed by omitting reverse transcriptase in the reaction mixtures; positive controls were carried out with 50 ng of B. burgdorferi genomic DNA as template in place of total RNA. Primers used for RT-PCRs are listed in Table 1.
DNA sequencing and computer analyses. Nucleotide sequencing was performed with an Applied Biosystems model 373A automated DNA sequencer and PRISM ready reaction DyeDeoxy terminator cycle sequencing kits as instructed by the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, Calif.). Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed and manipulated by using the University of Wisconsin Computer Genetics Group Wisconsin Package version 7.3 (GenBank database release 82.0) (13), Lasergene (DNASTAR, Madison, Wis.), and MacVector version 4.1.1 (International Biotechnologies Inc.-Kodak, New Haven, Conn.) software packages. Promoter prediction analyses were carried out with the Promoter Prediction by Neural Network software (29a).
Fusion proteins. A glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein of OspC was described previously (9). GST fusions of lipoproteins Mlp-8, Mlp-9, and Mlp-10 (lacking acylation sites) were generated by PCR amplification of DNAs from lambda clones encoding the corresponding predicated mature portions of each protein; the oligonucleotide primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1. PCR products were restriction enzyme digested and ligated into the corresponding polylinker sites of pGEX4T-2 (Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.). The resultant fusion proteins were purified by affinity chromatography as described previously (25).
To construct a partial fusion protein (epitope-specific version) of Mlp-8, a DNA fragment encoding amino acid residues 130 to 149 was amplified by PCR from the DNA of its lambda clone (see Table 1 for oligonucleotide primers). This partial fusion protein was designed to contain less than five consecutive amino acids identical to any other Mlp lipoprotein. The PCR product was restriction enzyme digested and ligated into the corresponding polylinker sites of pQE40 (Qiagen, Inc.). The partial fusion protein also contained a His6 tag and a murine dihydrofolate reductase protein. A comparable protocol (see Table 1 for oligonucleotide primers) was used for construction of a partial fusion protein of Mlp-10, which contained amino acid residues 123 to 143. Epitope-specific partial fusion proteins were purified by affinity chromatography on a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid matrix as instructed by the manufacturer (Qiagen). Protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce).Antibodies and antisera.
Rat polyclonal antisera directed
against fusion proteins were prepared according to a previously
published protocol (25). Polyclonal antisera against OspC,
monoclonal antibody 14D2-27 against OspA, and monoclonal antibody
8H3-33 against FlaB of B. burgdorferi B31 were previously
described (1). Monoclonal antibody 17C3-73 directed against
Mlp-9 was generated by immunizing BALB/c mice with the full-length
fusion protein according to previously published protocols (1,
31). Sera from groups of B. burgdorferi-infected C3H/HeJ mice were obtained at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks after
infestation with I. scapularis nymphs harboring B. burgdorferi 297; like sera were pooled and stored at
70°C
until use.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and immunoblotting. Samples for protein analysis were boiled for 10 min in final sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 10% glycerol [vol/vol], 5% [vol/vol] 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.0% SDS, 0.001% [vol/vol] bromophenol blue) prior to electrophoresis through 2.4% stacking and 12.5 or 15% polyacrylamide resolving gels. Gels were then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Alternatively, proteins were transferred electrophoretically to a 0.45-µm-pore-size nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.) for immunoblotting. Immunoblots were incubated with primary antibodies at the following dilutions: 1:500 for rat Mlp epitope-specific antisera and sera from B. burgdorferi-infected mice; 1:2,000 for all other rat polyclonal antisera; and 1:50 for hybridoma clone supernatants. This was followed by incubations with 1:2,000 dilutions of either goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rat immunoglobulin G (heavy- and light-chain-specific)-horseradish peroxidase conjugates and then, in some experiments (Fig. 7), rabbit anti-goat immunoglobulin G-horseradish peroxidase conjugates (all from Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa.). Immunoblots were developed with 4-chloro-1-naphthol as the substrate.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Nucleotide sequences for the mlp-8, mlp-9, and mlp-10 genes of strain 297 were submitted to GenBank under the accession no. AF046998, AF046999, and AF047000, respectively.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of three new 2.9 loci. We initially reported on the presence of seven 2.9 loci in B. burgdorferi 297 (29) distributed among two species of circular (supercoiled) plasmids (cp32 and cp18). Based upon the fact that none of the previously reported 2.9 orfD sequences of the seven 2.9 loci completely matched the original orfD probe used initially to identify each locus (29), we assumed that one or more additional 2.9 loci were present in B. burgdorferi 297. In the present study, further screening of a lambda genomic library by using a 32P-labeled probe from a highly conserved region of orfD (29) led to the identification of three other loci, designated 2.9-8, 2.9-9, and 2.9-10 (Fig. 1). Hundreds of additional 2.9 locus-encoding DNA fragments from B. burgdorferi 297 genomic libraries screened via high-throughput automated DNA sequencing did not yield any other unique 2.9 loci.
|
genes, whereas the 2.9-10 locus contained a rev
gene rather than rep+/rep
genes.
Upstream of the rep+ gene in the
2.9-8 locus was a unique ORF not present in any other 2.9 locus; this ORF is identical to a hypothetical ORF, BBS27, which has
been localized to the circular plasmid cp32-3 in B. burgdorferi B31 (4a). Further downstream of the
rep+/rep
and rev genes
of each 2.9 locus were the mlp lipoprotein genes.
The three new Mlp lipoproteins segregate into two classes.
Our
interests have been focused largely on characterizing the 2.9 (Mlp)
lipoproteins encoded downstream of the
rep+/rep
regions (29).
We reported previously that these lipoproteins segregate into two
distinct classes (I and II) based on size, hydrophilicity, sequence
similarities, and reactivity with polyclonal antisera (29).
Lipoproteins within each class tend to share 65 to 86% sequence
identity, whereas members between the two classes are only 20 to 30%
identical (29). In the present study, sequence analysis
revealed that Mlp-9 segregated most closely with the class I
lipoproteins (70 to 80% identity with other class I lipoproteins), whereas Mlp-8 and Mlp-10 appeared to fall into class II (70 to 86%
identity with other class II lipoproteins). This theoretical distinction was supported by immunoblot analyses which showed that
polyclonal anti-Mlp-9 antiserum cross-reacted with the class I
lipoproteins (Mlp-1, -4, -5, -7B, and -9), whereas polyclonal anti-Mlp-8 and anti-Mlp-10 antisera cross-reacted with the class II
lipoproteins (Mlp-2, -3, -7A, -8, and -10) (Fig.
2). Finally, BLAST searches revealed that
lipoproteins Mlp-8, -9, and -10 have extensive amino acid homologies
with the analogous ORFs in B. burgdorferi B31 (paralogous
family 113) (4a, 17); Mlp-9 was 72% identical to ORF BBQ35,
and Mlp-8 and Mlp-10 were 69 to 83% identical to ORFs BBL28, BBM28,
BBN28, BBO28, BBP28, BBR28, and BBS30. Members of the paralogous family
113 (4a, 17) were noted to be related to the Mlp
lipoproteins (29).
|
The three new 2.9 loci are encoded on circular plasmids cp32 and cp18. We showed previously that the original 2.9 loci were distributed among circular plasmids cp32 and cp18 (29). To localize the new 2.9 loci among the genetic contents of B. burgdorferi 297, Southern blot analyses were performed with radioactive oligonucleotide probes specific for each of the three new mlp genes. Given the high DNA homologies among all of the mlp genes, it first was necessary to confirm the specificities of the oligonucleotide probes used for detecting and localizing individual mlp genes. To accomplish this, a standard dot blot hybridization was carried out; as shown in Fig. 3A, each probe hybridized only with its corresponding template. When used to probe borrelial DNA separated by two-dimensional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (29), the three probes hybridized to the circular plasmids but not to the linear plasmids (not shown). To identify the circular plasmid(s) containing these genes, supercoiled plasmids of B. burgdorferi were first isolated by two successive rounds of CsCl density gradient centrifugation and then used in Southern blot assays with the probes specific for each mlp gene. As shown in Fig. 3B, probes for mlp-8 and mlp-10 hybridized strongly with the cp32 plasmid(s), whereas the probe for mlp-9 hybridized most intensely with cp18. Some residual hybridization of the mlp-9 probe with cp32, however, also was detectable, possibly due to minor trapping of cp18 within cp32 DNA.
|
Analyses of gene transcripts. To assess whether the three new mlp genes were transcribed in B. burgdorferi 297 during in vitro cultivation, total RNA was isolated and quantities of 3 and 30 µg were subjected to Northern blot hybridization. The same specific hybridization probes (Fig. 3A) used to localize the lipoprotein genes to the cp32 and cp18 plasmids (Fig. 3B) were used in these experiments. Probes for mlp-9 and mlp-10 yielded hybridization signals that were only barely detectable even when 30 µg of RNA was probed (Fig. 4). The probe for mlp-10 appeared to hybridize with a single mRNA species of 0.4 kb, consistent with the predicted size of the transcript (Fig. 4, lane 7). The Northern blot for mlp-9, however, revealed a 1.3-kb mRNA species (Fig. 4, lane 5) which did not match the predicted size but rather corresponded to the size of the mRNA if the lipoprotein gene were cotranscribed with its upstream rep+ gene.
|
10 region of the theoretical P1 promoter. These results suggest that
the mlp-8 gene may be cotranscribed with its upstream
rep+ gene from the theoretical P1 promoter or
that multiple promoters are involved; although Northern blotting
implied that the mlp-8 gene may be transcribed from three
promoters, results of RT-PCR experiments were unable to discern this
because the smaller amplicons could have derived from a larger (i.e., A
plus D) mRNA template.
|
Expression of the Mlp lipoproteins. Recently a new animal model was described for studying differential antigen expression by B. burgdorferi as it replicates in a mammalian host-adapted state (1). Using this model, we examined the influence of various B. burgdorferi cultivation conditions on expression (as detected by immunoblotting) of one or more of its Mlp lipoproteins. However, because polyclonal antiserum directed against an individual Mlp tends to be cross-reactive with other Mlp lipoproteins (particularly those within the same antigenic class [Fig. 2]), the first objective was to generate monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies with absolute specificity for each lipoprotein. In the case of Mlp-9, this was accomplished by producing a monoclonal antibody (17C3-73) (Fig. 6). For Mlp-8 and Mlp-10, specific antisera generated against epitope-specific versions of the polypeptides were produced (Fig. 6).
|
|
|
B. burgdorferi-infected mice produce antibodies against the Mlp lipoproteins. Results from immunoblot and RT-PCR experiments described above implied that one or more of the Mlp lipoproteins should be expressed as spirochetes replicate in mammalian tissues. To examine this, antibody responses of B. burgdorferi-infected mice were used as surrogate markers of lipoprotein expression during spirochetal growth in vivo. Groups of C3H/HeJ mice were infected by infestation with I. scapularis nymphs harboring B. burgdorferi 297. After various intervals postinfection, sera were collected; like sera were pooled and used in immunoblotting experiments with each of the three Mlp lipoproteins. As shown in Fig. 9, antibody reactivity with Mlp-8 was detectable as early as 2 weeks postinfection and became even more intense as the infection progressed to 16 weeks. In contrast, antibodies directed against Mlp-9 and Mlp-10 did not appear until 16 and 8 weeks postinfection, respectively.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Elucidating the temporal patterns of antigen expression as B. burgdorferi cycles between its arthropod and mammalian hosts is of paramount importance in understanding the pathogenesis of Lyme disease; differential antigen expression likely underlies events associated with tissue invasion, dissemination, and bacterial chronicity. Moreover, differential antigen expression patterns provide a potential window into the genetics of B. burgdorferi and have profound importance in the selection of new vaccine candidates and the development of new serodiagnostic reagents for Lyme disease. The redundancy of the 2.9 locus (29) led us to hypothesize that one or more of the Mlp lipoproteins may undergo differential antigen expression in B. burgdorferi. As a prelude to exploring this possibility, it first was necessary to identify virtually all of the 2.9 loci in B. burgdorferi 297. Porcella et al. (29) reported on seven 2.9 loci in B. burgdorferi 297; subsequent DNA sequence analyses revealed that the 2.9-6 locus actually was identical to 2.9-1 (unpublished data). Given the presence of two tandem mlp-7A and mlp-7B genes on the 2.9-7 locus (29), a total of six distinct 2.9 loci and seven mlp genes actually were identified in our original study (29). That the 2.9 loci are encoded on as many as nine cp32 plasmids and one or more cp18 plasmid (a naturally occurring truncated species of cp32 [37]) (4a, 5, 39) prompted us to seek and identify the additional 2.9 loci described in this report. Two of these contained orfD genes that were precise matches for the orfD probe used in the initial study of Porcella et al. (29). While this does not preclude the possibility that other, as yet unidentified 2.9 loci exist in B. burgdorferi 297, that extensive screenings yielded the same loci many times over suggests that virtually all of the 2.9 loci of B. burgdorferi 297 were identified in the present study.
Herein we have renamed the 10 lipoprotein genes of the 2.9 loci of B. burgdorferi strain 297 as mlp-1, mlp-2, mlp-3, mlp-4, mlp-5, mlp-7A, mlp-7B, mlp-8, mlp-9, and mlp-10. There is no mlp-6 gene because the original 2.9-6 locus is identical to 2.9-1. Seven of mlp genes are encoded on cp32 plasmids, whereas two (mlp-3 and mlp-9) are on cp18. Five of the corresponding lipoproteins fall into each of the two antigenic classes (in class I, Mlp-1, Mlp-4, Mlp-5, Mlp-7B, and Mlp-9; in class II, Mlp-2, Mlp-3, Mlp-7A, Mlp-8, and Mlp-10). Interestingly, analysis of available DNA sequence information suggests that seven of the Mlp paralogs in B. burgdorferi B31, segregate into antigenic class II whereas only one Mlp paralog (BBQ35; encoded on lp56) (4a) belongs to antigenic class I.
As in the study of Porcella et al. (29), Northern blot analysis herein established that the basal levels of transcription among the mlp-8, mlp-9, and mlp-10 genes varied considerably. Immunoblots using antibodies specific for each Mlp confirmed that such variation also existed at the protein level. These findings suggest that despite structural relatedness, members of the Mlp family may not function equivalently in the zoonotic life cycle of B. burgdorferi, or they may even carry out disparate function(s). Regardless, the mechanism(s) for variability in the levels of Mlp expression remains unclear but is somewhat paradoxical given that all three Mlp genes were uniformly inducible by either temperature shift in vitro or adaptation during growth of B. burgdorferi in DMCs. The theoretical 5' promoter regions for all of the mlp genes are highly similar, often differing by only one or a few nucleotides (29). Such similarities have precluded using transcriptional initiation approaches (e.g., primer extension analyses) as a strategy to assist with mlp promoter assignments. In this study, combined Northern blot and RT-PCR data suggested that the mlp-8 and mlp-9 genes may utilize multiple promoters and/or may be cotranscribed with the upstream rep+ gene. The significantly greater nucleotide sequence diversity of the rep+ region than of the 5' regions of the mlp genes may engender different promoter strengths (11, 26) that account for variable basal expression levels of the mlp genes. Additional work will be required to address this possibility.
The mlp genes overall were less efficiently expressed when B. burgdorferi was cultivated at lower temperature (i.e., 23°C), a condition likely analogous to spirochetes within ticks. When the in vitro growth temperature for B. burgdorferi was shifted to 34 or 37°C, conditions which ostensibly mimic temperature transitions during tick feeding on a mammalian host, there were marked increases in the expression of all three mlp genes. These increases were reflected both at the transcript (RT-PCR) and protein (immunoblot) levels. These observations suggest that at least three mlp genes share a similar regulatory component, and thus our data support the hypothesis that the mlp genes undergo a form of global upregulation in response to elevated temperature.
In other bacterial systems, temperature-mediated regulation occurs at the levels of both transcription and translation; changes in mRNA conformation, protein conformation, and DNA supercoiling can all modulate gene expression (24). In the case of DNA supercoiling, the H-NS protein, a histone-like protein with the ability to affect DNA supercoiling (22, 23), is an important effector of transcription. Thus far, an H-NS homolog has not been identified in B. burgdorferi. Regarding thermoregulation, Schwan et al. (32) and Stevenson et al. (38) were the first to show that OspC is induced upon temperature shift from 23°C to 35 or 37°C. The decorin-binding protein A of B. burgdorferi also is upregulated by temperature (6). Of particular relevance to the present study, Stevenson et al. (36) reported that eight OspE/F-related proteins (erp genes), also encoded on the cp32 (one encoded on lp56) plasmids of B. burgdorferi B31, are expressed at various levels at 23°C but are all upregulated at 35°C. Stevenson et al. (38) and Akins et al. (1) also showed that OspE and OspF of B. burgdorferi N40 and 297 are upregulated by temperature shift from 23°C to 35 or 37°C. Although recent analyses suggest that OspE, OspF, and OspE/F-related proteins (Erps) are more distantly related than initially appreciated (2), that they are all encoded on homologs of cp32 and cp18 invites the provocative hypothesis that other genes on the cp32 or cp18 plasmids may be globally upregulated in response to temperature shift. A variation on this theme might be that selected cp32 or cp18 plasmids have overall higher basal expression levels of their genes, perhaps modulated by degrees of supercoiling, thereby giving rise to an asynchronous expression pattern of antigens encoded on certain circular plasmids. In this regard, it is noteworthy that OspF and Mlp-8, which are approximately 10 kb apart on the same cp32 plasmid (cp32-3) of B. burgdorferi 297 (2), are expressed at relatively higher levels than their homologous family members (1) (Fig. 7). p21 and Mlp-9, which are about 10 kb apart on the same cp18 plasmid (cp18-2) of B. burgdorferi 297 (2), both are expressed at very low basal levels or are undetectable (2) (Fig. 7). Additional linkage and expression data for all of the mlp and other genes encoded on the cp32 and cp18 plasmids, however, will be required before firm conclusions can be drawn regarding plasmid-based mechanisms of gene regulation.
The cultivation of B. burgdorferi in DMCs implanted intraperitoneally into rats has been an important advance toward assessing differential antigen expression by B. burgdorferi in a mammalian host-adapted state (1). As in the prior study (1), we again observed that OspA was sharply downregulated by spirochetes cultivated in DMCs. In contrast, however, both comparative RT-PCR and immunoblot procedures indicated that spirochetes cultivated in DMCs expressed even higher levels of Mlp lipoproteins (particularly Mlp-8) than those cultivated in vitro under temperature-shifted conditions. These findings underscore that temperature induction alone does not appear to account for maximal levels of mlp gene expression and that some other, as yet undefined factor(s) modulates further upregulation of these genes during mammalian infection. Although it is not yet completely clear to what extent DMC-cultivated spirochetes precisely resemble those in mammalian tissue (1), the rat peritoneal chamber model will continue to be instrumental in deciphering at least some host factors that contribute to the upregulation of mlp and other genes of B. burgdorferi replicating in a mammalian host-adapted state.
Data provided in this study prompt a working model for the temporal expression of the Mlp lipoproteins as B. burgdorferi transitions from its arthropod vector into mammalian tissues. Low levels of certain Mlp lipoproteins (e.g., Mlp-9 and Mlp-10) imply that at least some of the 2.9 lipoproteins are not essential for B. burgdorferi survival in ticks. However, during engorgement, it is likely that increasing temperature within nymph midguts induces mlp gene expression to levels that culminate in lipoprotein synthesis sufficient for a newly needed physiological function(s). The net effect of such a process(es) could be viewed as an alternative form of differential antigen expression that is not predicated on a reciprocal upregulation/downregulation process, such as that embodied in the OspC/OspA paradigm (27, 32). This hypothesis, however, remains to be tested further by examining the expression of the Mlp lipoproteins within B. burgdorferi-infected tick midguts before and after feeding. That tick-inoculated mice produced antibodies against Mlp-8 relatively early (2 weeks) postinfection, however, was consistent with the early temporal expression of at least one or more of the Mlp lipoproteins. We cannot conclude definitively which of the Mlp lipoproteins may be expressed early during mouse infection because immunoblot data for Mlp-8 were subject to possible misinterpretation; mouse antibodies elicited after tick challenge may have been cross-reactive with another Mlp, particularly one within the same antigenic class. However, spirochetes harvested from DMCs and probed with antibodies of defined specificities for Mlp-8, Mlp-9, and Mlp-10 showed conclusively that all three were expressed during the replication of B. burgdorferi within rat peritoneal cavities, with Mlp-8 being the most abundant. It is anticipated that the further use of B. burgdorferi harvested from DMCs and the development of additional antibody probes with defined specificity for each Mlp will assist in obtaining a more complete differential expression pattern for all of the Mlp lipoproteins. Last, it is noteworthy that as the infection of mice progressed to 8 and 16 weeks postinfection, antibodies to additional Mlp lipoproteins (e.g., Mlp-10 and Mlp-9) appeared, consistent with our contention that one or more of the lower-abundance Mlp lipoproteins eventually are expressed during progression of the mammalian infection.
A central question surrounding the mlp gene family is to what extent Mlp lipoproteins may be surface exposed in B. burgdorferi, thereby potentially serving as adjuncts to the current Lyme disease vaccine. The recently approved OspA human Lyme disease vaccine represents an important medical advance. However, as reviewed by Steigbigel and Benach (35), a number of unresolved issues remain concerning this first-generation monovalent vaccine. One way of potentially enhancing the efficacy of the current OspA Lyme disease vaccine would be to expand the number of vaccinogens to include one or more also expressed during the mammalian phase of infection, particularly during the early phase, thereby providing immune targets during both phases of the zoonotic life cycle of B. burgdorferi. Given its high basal expression level, upregulation by temperature shift and the mammalian environment, and evidence of an early antibody response in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis, Mlp-8 would be an excellent candidate vaccinogen. In this regard, preliminary studies recently have shown that when B. burgdorferi was cultivated in vitro at 37°C, four Mlp lipoproteins tested (Mlp-4, Mlp-5, Mlp-7A, and Mlp-8) were sensitive to proteinase K digestion under conditions which left flagellin intact, implying that at least some Mlp lipoproteins are surface exposed in B. burgdorferi. Moreover, preliminary vaccine experiments with a multivalent formulation of Mlp-2, Mlp-3, Mlp-7A, Mlp-8, and Mlp-10 (antigenic class II) gave rise to 80% protection of mice, a level comparable to what has been observed for the decorin-binding protein (20, 21). These provocative findings give impetus for assessing further the temporal expression patterns, surface exposure, and vaccinogenic potentials for all of the Mlp lipoproteins.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
X.Y. and T.G.P. contributed equally to this work.
We thank Deborah Bouis, Ranjit Deka, and Anette Huebner for helpful discussions and Martin Goldberg, Charis Lawrenson, and Hsiao-Ching Yen for excellent technical assistance.
We gratefully acknowledge funding for this work provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U50/CCU614875), the Arthritis Foundation (via the Engalitcheff Research Fund), the Robert A. Welch Foundation (grant I-0940), and grants AI-45538 and AI-29735 from the Lyme disease program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, U.T. Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9048. Phone: (214) 648-5900. Fax: (214) 648-5905. E-mail: norgard{at}utsw.swmed.edu.
Editor: : J. T. Barbieri
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Akins, D. R., K. W. Bourell, M. J. Caimano, M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf. 1998. A new animal model for studying Lyme disease spirochetes in a mammalian host-adapted state. J. Clin. Investig. 101:2240-2250[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Akins, D. R.,
M. J. Caimano,
X. Yang,
F. Cerna,
M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf.
1999.
Molecular and evolutionary analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi 297 circular plasmid-encoded lipoproteins with OspE- and OspF-like leader peptides.
Infect. Immun.
67:1526-1532 |
| 3. | Akins, D. R., S. F. Porcella, T. G. Popova, D. Shevchenko, M. Li, M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf. 1995. Evidence for in vivo but not in vitro expression of a Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein F (OspF) homologue. Mol. Microbiol. 18:507-520[Medline]. |
| 4. | Aron, L., C. Toth, H. P. Godfrey, and F. C. Cabello. 1996. Identification and mapping of a chromosomal gene cluster of Borrelia burgdorferi containing genes expressed in vivo. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 145:309-314[Medline]. |
| 4a. | Borrelia burgdorferi Genome Database. 7 July 1999, revision date. [Online.] http://www.tigr.org/tdb/mdb/bbdb/bbdb.html. The Institute for Genomic Research, Rockville, Md. [24 September 1999, last date accessed]. |
| 5. |
Casjens, S.,
R. van Vugt,
K. Tilly,
P. A. Rosa, and B. Stevenson.
1997.
Homology throughout the multiple 32-kilobase circular plasmids present in Lyme disease spirochetes.
J. Bacteriol.
179:217-227 |
| 6. |
Cassatt, D. R.,
N. K. Patel,
N. D. Ulbrandt, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
DbpA, but not OspA, is expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi during spirochetemia and is a target for protective antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
66:5379-5387 |
| 7. |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1997.
Lyme disease United States, 1996.
Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep.
46:531-535[Medline].
|
| 8. |
Champion, C. I.,
D. R. Blanco,
J. T. Skare,
D. A. Haake,
M. Giladi,
D. Foley,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1994.
A 9.0-kilobase-pair circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferi encodes an exported protein: evidence for expression only during infection.
Infect. Immun.
62:2653-2661 |
| 9. |
Cox, D. L.,
D. R. Akins,
K. W. Bourell,
P. Lahdenne,
M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf.
1996.
Limited surface exposure of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface lipoproteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7973-7978 |
| 10. | Das, S., S. W. Barthold, S. S. Giles, R. R. Montgomery, S. R. Telford, and E. Fikrig. 1997. Temporal pattern of Borrelia burgdorferi p21 expression in ticks and the mammalian host. J. Clin. Investig. 99:987-995[Medline]. |
| 11. | de Lorenzo, V., and J. Perez-Martin. 1996. Regulatory noise in prokaryotic promoters: how bacteria learn to respond to novel environmental signals. Mol. Microbiol. 19:1177-1184[Medline]. |
| 12. |
de Silva, A. M.,
N. S. Zeidner,
Y. Zhang,
M. C. Dolan,
J. Piesman, and E. Fikrig.
1999.
Influence of outer surface protein A antibody on Borrelia burgdorferi within feeding ticks.
Infect. Immun.
67:30-35 |
| 13. |
deSilva, A. M.,
S. R. Telford,
L. R. Brunet,
S. W. Barthold, and E. Fikrig.
1996.
Borrelia burgdorferi OspA is an arthropod-specific transmission-blocking Lyme disease vaccine.
J. Exp. Med.
183:271-275 |
| 14. | Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and O. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387-395. |
| 15. | Fikrig, E., M. Chen, S. W. Barthold, J. Anguita, W. Feng, S. R. Telford, and R. A. Flavell. 1999. Borrelia burgdorferi erpT expression in the arthropod vector and murine host. Mol. Microbiol. 31:281-290[Medline]. |
| 16. | Fikrig, E., W. Feng, J. Aversa, R. T. Schoen, and R. A. Flavell. 1998. Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi genes during erythema migrans and Lyme arthritis. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1198-1201[Medline]. |
| 17. | Fraser, C. M., S. Casjens, W. M. Huang, G. G. Sutton, R. Clayton, R. Lathigra, O. White, K. A. Ketchum, R. Dodson, E. K. Hickey, M. Gwinn, B. Dougherty, J.-F. Tomb, R. D. Fleischmann, D. Richardson, J. Peterson, A. R. Kerlavage, J. Quackenbush, S. Salzberg, M. Hanson, R. van Vugt, N. Palmer, M. D. Adams, J. Gocayne, J. Weidman, T. Utterback, L. Watthey, L. McDonald, P. Artiach, C. Bowman, S. Garland, C. Fujii, M. D. Cotton, K. Horst, K. Roberts, B. Hatch, H. O. Smith, and J. C. Venter. 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580-586[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Gilmore, R. D., and M. L. Mbow.
1998.
A monoclonal antibody generated by antigen inoculation via tick bite is reactive to the Borrelia burgdorferi Rev protein, a member of the 2.9 gene family locus.
Infect. Immun.
66:980-986 |
| 19. | Guina, T., and D. B. Oliver. 1997. Cloning and analysis of a Borrelia burgdorferi membrane-interactive protein exhibiting haemolytic activity. Mol. Microbiol. 24:1201-1213[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Hagman, K. E.,
P. Lahdenne,
T. G. Popova,
S. F. Porcella,
D. R. Akins,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1998.
Decorin-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi is encoded within a two-gene operon and is protective in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2674-2683 |
| 21. |
Hanson, M. S.,
D. R. Cassatt,
B. P. Guo,
N. K. Patel,
M. P. McCarthy,
D. W. Dorward, and M. Hook.
1998.
Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection.
Infect. Immun.
66:2143-2153 |
| 22. | Higgins, C. F., J. C. D. Hinton, C. S. J. Hulton, T. Owen-Hughes, G. D. Pavitt, and A. Seirafi. 1990. Protein H1: a role for chromatin structure in the regulation of bacterial gene expression and virulence? Mol. Microbiol. 4:2007-2012[Medline]. |
| 23. | Hulton, C. S. J., A. Seirafi, J. C. D. Hinton, J. M. Sidebotham, L. Waddell, G. D. Pavitt, T. Owen-Hughes, A. Spassky, H. Buc, and C. F. Higgins. 1990. Histone-like protein H1 (H-NS), DNA supercoiling, and gene expression in bacteria. Cell 63:631-642[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Hurme, R., and M. Rhen.
1998.
Temperature sensing in bacterial gene regulation what it all boils down to.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:1-6[Medline].
|
| 25. | Lahdenne, P., S. F. Porcella, K. E. Hagman, D. R. Akins, T. G. Popova, D. L. Cox, L. I. Katona, J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard. 1997. Molecular characterization of a 6.6-kilodalton Borrelia burgdorferi outer membrane-associated lipoprotein (lp6.6) which appears to be downregulated during mammalian infection. Infect. Immun. 65:412-421[Abstract]. |
| 26. |
Lisser, S., and H. Margalit.
1993.
Compilation of E. coli mRNA promoter sequences.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:1507-1516 |
| 27. |
Montgomery, R. R.,
S. E. Malawista,
K. J. M. Feen, and L. K. Bockenstedt.
1996.
Direct demonstration of antigenic substitution of Borrelia burgdorferi ex vivo: exploration of the paradox of the early immune response to outer surface proteins A and C in Lyme disease.
J. Exp. Med.
183:261-269 |
| 28. |
Pollack, R. J.,
S. R. Telford, and A. Spielman.
1993.
Standardization of medium for culturing Lyme disease spirochetes.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:1251-1255 |
| 29. |
Porcella, S. F.,
T. G. Popova,
D. R. Akins,
M. Li,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1996.
Borrelia burgdorferi supercoiled plasmids encode multicopy tandem open reading frames and a lipoprotein gene family.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3293-3307 |
| 29a. | Promoter Prediction by Neural Network. 22 September 1998, revision date. [Online.] http://www-hgc.lbl.gov/projects/promoter.html. [24 September 1999, last date accessed.] |
| 30. |
Ramamoorthy, R., and M. T. Philipp.
1998.
Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi proteins during growth in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
66:5119-5124 |
| 31. |
Robertson, S. M.,
J. R. Kettman,
J. N. Miller, and M. V. Norgard.
1982.
Murine monoclonal antibodies specific for virulent Treponema pallidum (Nichols).
Infect. Immun.
36:1076-1085 |
| 32. |
Schwan, T. G.,
J. Piesman,
W. T. Golde,
M. C. Dolan, and P. A. Rosa.
1995.
Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2909-2913 |
| 33. |
Sinsky, R. J., and J. Piesman.
1989.
Ear punch biopsy method for detection and isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from rodents.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
27:1723-1727 |
| 34. | Steere, A. C. 1995. Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease, Lyme borreliosis), p. 2143-2155. In G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 35. |
Steigbigel, R. T., and J. L. Benach.
1998.
Immunization against Lyme disease an important first step.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:263-264 |
| 36. |
Stevenson, B.,
J. L. Bono,
T. G. Schwan, and P. Rosa.
1998.
Borrelia burgdorferi Erp proteins are immunogenic in mammals infected by tick bite, and their synthesis is inducible in cultured bacteria.
Infect. Immun.
66:2648-2654 |
| 37. |
Stevenson, B.,
S. Casjens,
R. van Vugt,
S. F. Porcella,
K. Tilly,
J. L. Bono, and P. Rosa.
1997.
Characterization of cp18, a naturally truncated member of the cp32 family of Borrelia burgdorferi plasmids.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4285-4291 |
| 38. | Stevenson, B., T. G. Schwan, and P. A. Rosa. 1995. Temperature-related differential expression of antigens in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63:4535-4539[Abstract]. |
| 39. |
Stevenson, B.,
K. Tilly, and P. A. Rosa.
1996.
A family of genes located on four separate 32-kilobase circular plasmids in Borrelia burgdorferi B31.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3508-3516 |
| 40. |
Suk, K.,
S. Das,
W. Sun,
B. Jwang,
S. W. Barthold,
R. A. Flavell, and E. Fikrig.
1995.
Borrelia burgdorferi genes selectively expressed in the infected host.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4269-4273 |
| 41. |
Theisen, M.
1996.
Molecular cloning and characterization of nlpH, encoding a novel, surface-exposed, polymorphic, plasmid-encoded 33-kilodalton lipoprotein of Borrelia afzelii.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6435-6442 |
| 42. | Wallich, R., C. Brenner, M. D. Kramer, and M. M. Simon. 1995. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel linear-plasmid-encoded gene, pG, of Borrelia burgdorferi expressed only in vivo. Infect. Immun. 63:3327-3335[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»