Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, February 1999, p. 921-927, Vol. 67, No. 2
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Antigen-Specific T-Cell Responses in Humans after
Intranasal Immunization with a Meningococcal Serogroup B Outer
Membrane Vesicle Vaccine
Fredrik
Oftung,1,*
Lisbeth Meyer
Næss,1
Lee M.
Wetzler,2
Gro Ellen
Korsvold,1
Audun
Aase,1
E. Arne
Høiby,3
Rolf
Dalseg,1
Johan
Holst,1
Terje E.
Michaelsen,1,4 and
Bjørn
Haneberg1,5
Department of
Vaccinology1 and
Department of
Bacteriology,3 National Institute of Public
Health, and
Department of
Pharmacognosy4 and
Department of
Microbiology,5 Institute of Pharmacy,
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and
Maxwell Finland
Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston
University School of Medicine, Boston,
Massachusetts2
Received 15 June 1998/Returned for modification 11 August
1998/Accepted 13 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have studied the ability of the Norwegian group B meningococcal
outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine, when administered intranasally without adjuvant, to induce T-cell responses in humans. A
group of 12 vaccinees was immunized with four doses of OMVs (250 µg
of protein/dose) at weekly intervals, and a single booster dose was
given 5 months later. In vitro T-cell proliferation in response to the
OMV vaccine, purified PorA (class 1) protein, PorB (class 3) protein,
and one unrelated control antigen (Mycobacterium bovis BCG)
was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation into
peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from the vaccinees before
and after the immunizations. The nasal OMV immunizations induced
antigen-specific T-cell responses in the majority of the vaccinees when
tested against OMVs (7 of 12) and the PorA antigen (11 of 12). None of
the vaccinees showed a vaccine-induced T-cell response to the PorB
antigen after the initial four doses. Although some individuals
responded to all the vaccine antigens after the booster dose, this
response was not significant when the vaccinees were analyzed as a
group. We have also demonstrated that the PorA antigen-specific T-cell
responses correlated with anti-OMV immunoglobulin A (IgA) levels in
nasal secretions, with anti-OMV IgG levels in serum, and with serum bactericidal activity. In conclusion, we have shown that it is possible
to induce antigen-specific T-cell responses in humans by intranasal
administration of a meningococcal OMV vaccine without adjuvant.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infections with
Neisseria meningitidis represent a major health
problem in several countries (12, 20, 27). Vaccines based on capsular polysaccharides have been developed against serogroup
A and C meningococci (9). The serogroup B polysaccharides, however, are poorly immunogenic in humans (43). A protein
based outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine was therefore developed at the National Institute of Public Health in Norway (10) and
proved to be protective against serogroup B meningococcal disease
when given intramuscularly with Al(OH)3 as adjuvant
(3). We have also used meningococcal OMVs as a model
system to evaluate the prospects for developing future mucosal vaccines
based on nonreplicating particulate antigens (8).
Mucosal delivery of vaccines may be advantageous, primarily due to
simplified administration and induction of mucosal immune responses at
the natural site of infection (22, 35). Such mucosal
antibodies against meningococci might be important to block
colonization and prevent systemic infection. In addition, mucosal
vaccines may induce systemic immunity measured as both antibody and
T-cell responses in peripheral blood (22, 35). It has been
suggested that mucosal adjuvants should be added to such vaccines to
enhance the immunogenic effect and avoid induction of tolerance
(22, 35). However, we have demonstrated that it is possible
to induce both mucosal and systemic antibody responses in mice by nasal
immunizations with OMVs without any mucosal adjuvant (8).
Recently, we have also shown that OMVs given alone as a nasal vaccine
to humans can induce local mucosal and systemic antibodies with strong
bactericidal activity (15). Nonproliferating mucosal
vaccines may thus be an alternative to systemic vaccines against
bacterial diseases.
Whereas protection against extracellular bacterial infections is
mediated mainly by antibodies, T cells also play an important role in
this respect by regulating B-cell responses, e.g., by inducing
immunoglobulin (Ig) class switching and affinity maturation and
increasing the magnitude of the response (2). However, little is known about the induction of antigen-specific T-cell responses after mucosal immunizations in humans. In this work, we have
extended the previous study with the nasal meningococcal OMV vaccine
(15) by investigating antigen-specific T-cell responses to whole OMVs and purified meningococcal outer membrane proteins (OMPs). We have also compared such effects with the corresponding mucosal and systemic antibody responses (15). The aim
of this work was to study cellular immune responses which might be
useful for further understanding and monitoring of the immunogenicity of nonproliferating mucosal vaccines.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Vaccine preparation.
The nasal vaccine used in this study
consisted of OMVs from the epidemic meningococcal strain 44/76
(B:15:P1.7,16:L3,7,9) (10). The OMVs were prepared by
extraction of bacteria with 0.5% deoxycholate in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer
(pH 8.6) containing 10 mM EDTA and purified by differential
centrifugation (10). The nasal formulation of OMVs was given
without A1(OH)3 as adjuvant. Each nasal dose consisted of
250 µg of OMVs (measured as protein) in 0.5 ml of saline
(15), which is 10 times the dose previously used for
intramuscular injections (3).
Purified vaccine antigens and controls.
The PorA (class 1)
and PorB (class 3) OMP antigens used in proliferation assays in vitro
were purified from the mutant variants of strain 44/76, HI5 and HIII5,
which lack the class 1 and 3 OMPs, respectively. Both variants were
devoid of the RmpM (class 4) protein. The porins were solubilized by
the detergent Zwittergent, purified by chromatography, and
reconstituted as proteosomes devoid of potentially lymphotoxic
detergent (4, 13, 14, 39). There was no contamination by
other OMPs, as demonstrated by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot
analysis. Lipopolysaccharide contamination was less than 0.01%, as
judged by gel electrophoresis and silver staining (32). Throughout the study, Mycobacterium bovis BCG (Statens Serum
Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) were used as the positive control antigen and mitogen, respectively.
Vaccinees and immunization schedule.
Twelve healthy
volunteers, nine women and three men, 25 to 61 (median, 46)
years of age, were included in the study (Phase II-M1). The vaccine was
given four times at weekly intervals (initial immunizations), and a
fifth dose was given 5 months later (booster). Six of the volunteers
received the vaccine as nasal drops, and the other six received it as a
nasal spray, as previously described (15). None of the
vaccinees were found to be meningococcal carriers as determined by
nasopharyngeal cultures taken immediately before and during the study.
This study was approved by the Norwegian Medicines Control Authority as
well as the Regional Committee of Medical Research Ethics in Norway.
In vitro T-cell proliferation assays.
Blood samples,
collected in ACD Vacutainers (Beckton Dickinson, Rutherford, N.J.),
were obtained before vaccination and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 24, 25, and 26 of the vaccination schedule. Peripheral blood mononuclear
cells, freshly isolated from whole blood by density centrifugation
(Lymphoprep; Nycomed, Oslo, Norway), were assayed by the
[3H]thymidine incorporation method for proliferative
responses to whole OMVs, PorA antigen, and PorB antigen, as well as to
M. bovis BCG and PHA for control purposes. Antigen in
triplicate (concentrations given below) and 100,000 PBMC per well,
suspended in RPMI 1640 (Biowhittaker, Verviers, Belgium) (containing
glutamine plus penicillin and streptomycin) with 15% pooled human AB
serum, was plated in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Costar,
Cambridge, Mass.) at a final volume of 200 µl/well. After 6 days of
incubation in 5% CO2 at 37°C, the cells were pulsed with
[3H]thymidine (1.3 µCi/well) (Amersham, Little
Chalfont, United Kingdom) for 4 h and harvested (Packard
FilterMate), and incorporated [3H]thymidine was
determined by liquid scintillation counting (Packard TopCount). The
CD4+ phenotype of proliferating cells on day 6 was
confirmed by flow cytometry. In addition, it was possible to obtain a
dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation by adding blocking anti
HLA-DR antibodies (B8.11) to the assay (results not shown).
To determine the optimal concentrations of the antigens used in the
proliferation assays, the following titrations were performed. OMVs
derived from the vaccine strain were used at final protein concentrations of 4, 0.8, 0.16, and 0.032 µg/ml. Purified PorA and
PorB antigens were added to final concentrations of 25, 5, 1, and 0.2 µg/ml. BCG was used at final concentrations of 20, 4, and 0.8 µg/ml, and PHA was used at final concentrations of 25, 5, and 1 µg/ml. The results presented in this study were based on means of
triplicate counts per minute (cpm) for the optimal concentrations of
the antigens used: OMVs, 0.8 µg/ml; PorA protein, 5 µg/ml; PorB
protein, 5 µg/ml; BCG, 20 or 4 µg/ml; and PHA, 5 µg/ml.
Proliferative T-cell responses are expressed as cpm values calculated
in the following way: the mean of triplicate cpm values in the absence
of antigen (cpm medium) were subtracted from the mean of triplicate cpm
values in the presence of antigen (cpm Ag). A proliferative response
exceeding 2,000 cpm (background level) was defined as a positive T-cell
response. Participants at anytime point reaching a twofold increase
(compared to prevaccination levels) in their proliferative response as
well as exceeding 2,000 cpm point were considered responders.
OMV-specific antibodies and serum bactericidal activity.
The
vaccinees were previously tested for OMV-specific IgG antibodies in
serum and IgA antibodies in nasal secretions by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the results are expressed as arbitrary units
(15). The IgA levels in nasal secretions were corrected by
reference to total IgA in the samples and expressed as the ratios
between specific antibodies and total IgA concentrations (U per
microgram) (15). Determination of serum bactericidal activity was described previously (15, 16).
Statistical analyses.
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and
Spearman correlation coefficients were determined by the use of PRISM
Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.).
 |
RESULTS |
T-cell proliferation induced by OMVs.
All participants, except
one, were considered negative to OMVs at the start of the study (cpm < 2,000) (Fig. 1). After nasal vaccination,
7 of the 12 participants were found to be responders to OMVs (Fig. 1),
since they showed at least a twofold increase in proliferative
responses and exceeded the background level (2,000 cpm). Four of these
responders reached maximum response levels more than four times their
prevaccination levels, and two of them showed 156- and 35-fold
increases. When the group was analyzed on the basis of the maximum
increases reached by each individual, the OMV-specific T-cell response
was significant (P < 0.001). The results did not seem
to be influenced by the way the vaccine had been given; four and three
of the OMV responders received drops and spray, respectively, whereas
five and six of the PorA responders received this treatment.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Comparisons of T-cell proliferation (cpm) in
response to OMVs (0.8 µg/ml), the PorA antigen (5 µg/ml), and
the PorB antigen (5 µg/ml) in 12 volunteers before and after
intranasal immunizations with a meningococcal OMV vaccine without
adjuvant. Each symbol represents the preimmunization cpm (x
value) and the maximum postimmunization cpm (y value)
obtained for one vaccinee. The diagonal solid line in each graph
indicates the same post- as preimmunization values, and the two broken
lines indicate twofold increases and decreases. The dotted horizontal
lines define postimmunization levels of 2,000 cpm, considered to be the
limit of background responses. Values less than 100 cpm are
approximated to 100. A vaccinee is considered to be a responder to the
antigen tested if the symbol is above the doubling level (diagonal
broken line) as well as above the background level (2,000 cpm;
horizontal line).
|
|
The kinetics of the cellular immune responses to OMVs during the
complete vaccination experiment are shown in Fig.
2 in comparison
with the results obtained
with the purified PorA and PorB antigens
(median cpm). The maximum
median response to OMVs was reached
after the second dose (week 2), and
the response then declined
toward week 7. The vaccine-induced increase
in proliferation to
OMVs measured at week 2 was also significant
(
P = 0.0093). The
single vaccine dose given 5 months
after the initial four doses
did not result in a statistically
significant increase in the
OMV-specific T-cell responses, even though
four vaccinees responded
to this dose (4- to 20-fold increases) (Fig.
3). The response
of one of these
vaccinees was enhanced compared to the level observed
after the initial
immunizations.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Kinetics of the OMV (0.8 µg/ml), PorA (5 µg/ml), and PorB (5 µg/ml) antigen-specific T-cell
responses expressed as median cpm in 12 volunteers after intranasal
immunizations with a meningococcal OMV vaccine without adjuvant. The
immunizations are indicated by arrows.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Comparisons of T-cell proliferation (cpm) in response to
OMVs (0.8 µg/ml), the PorA antigen (5 µg/ml), and the PorB antigen
(5 µg/ml) in 12 volunteers before and after intranasal immunization
with a fifth dose of a meningococcal OMV vaccine without adjuvant. Each
symbol represents the prebooster cpm (x value) and the
maximum postbooster cpm (y value) obtained for one vaccinee.
The diagonal solid line in each graph indicates the same post- as
prebooster values, and the two broken lines indicate twofold increases
and decreases. The dotted horizontal lines define postbooster levels of
2,000 cpm, considered to be the limit of background responses. Values
less than 100 cpm are approximated to 100. A vaccinee is considered to
be a responder to the antigen tested if the symbol is above the
doubling level (diagonal broken line) as well as above the background
level (2,000 cpm; horizontal line).
|
|
T-cell proliferation induced by PorA and PorB proteins.
At the
start of the study, five of the participants showed a negative
response to the PorA antigen (<2,000 cpm) whereas seven participants showed a positive response (Fig. 1). After
the intranasal immunizations, 11 of 12 vaccinees were found to be
vaccine responders when tested against the PorA antigen (Fig. 1).
Moreover, a majority of the responders (6 of 11) exceeded a fourfold
increase in their response to this antigen, with the best responder
reaching a postimmunization level 16-fold higher than before
vaccination. When the group was analyzed on the basis of the maximum
increases reached by each individual, the PorA antigen T-cell response
was significant (P < 0.001). Although the individual
maximum responses against the PorA antigen were reached at different
time points, the median peak response was obtained simultaneously with
the corresponding peak of the OMV response (week 2) (Fig. 2). The
vaccine-induced increase in the PorA antigen-specific T-cell response
at this time point was also significant (P < 0.001).
Similar to the results obtained with OMVs, the median T-cell response
to the PorA antigen declined toward the prevaccination level at week 7 (Fig. 2). The fifth vaccine dose did not result in a significant
response when the vaccinees were considered as a group. However, four
of the vaccinees responded to this last vaccine dose, and one of them showed an enhanced response compared to the initial immunizations.
The kinetics of the PorB antigen T-cell response is included in Fig.
2
for comparison with the results obtained with the OMV
and PorA
antigens. None of the vaccinees were considered responders
to the PorB
antigen during the four initial immunizations (Fig.
1), but three of
them nevertheless responded to the fifth dose
(Fig.
3). These vaccinees
were among the same individuals as those
who responded to OMVs and
among the four who responded to the
PorA protein after the fifth dose.
However, an enhanced effect
of the fifth dose detected with all the
three antigens was found
in only one
vaccinee.
T-cell proliferation induced by BCG and PHA.
Since all
participants in the study previously had been vaccinated with BCG, this
antigen was included as a positive control in the in vitro T-cell
proliferation assays. The individual responses to BCG varied
considerably (10,000 to 150,000 cpm) and in all cases exceeded the
response levels to the meningococcal antigens. The results demonstrated
that the proliferative T-cell response to BCG did not show any
significant changes during the immunizations (Fig.
4). Likewise, the mitogen (PHA)-induced
proliferation observed was fairly constant for each individual
throughout the vaccination experiment (Fig. 4).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Comparisons of T-cell proliferation (cpm) in response to
M. bovis BCG as a control antigen (20 or 4 µg/ml) and PHA
(5 µg/ml) in 12 volunteers before and after intranasal immunizations
with a meningococcal OMV vaccine without adjuvant. Each symbol
represents the preimmunization cpm (x value) and the maximum
postimmunization cpm (y value) obtained for one vaccinee.
The diagonal solid line in each graph indicates the same post- as
preimmunization values, and the two broken lines indicate twofold
increases and decreases. The dotted horizontal lines define
postimmunization levels of 2,000 cpm, considered to be the limit of
background responses. Values less than 100 cpm are approximated to 100. A vaccinee is considered to be a responder to the antigen tested if the
symbol is above the doubling level (diagonal broken line) as well as
above the background level (2,000 cpm; horizontal line).
|
|
Correlations between T-cell proliferation and antibody
responses.
Based on pre- and maximum postimmunization levels,
nonparametric correlation analyses were used to test for relationships between the vaccine-induced cellular immune responses and the previously reported antibody responses (15). We obtained a
positive correlation between the PorA antigen-specific T-cell responses and the corresponding anti-OMV IgA levels in nasal secretions (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) (Fig.
5). A positive correlation was also found
between the same T-cell responses and the concentrations of anti-OMV
IgG in serum (r = 0.67, P = 0.017) (Fig.
6). Prevaccination values were not
included in this analysis, because IgG levels in sera from some
individuals were elevated compared to mucosal IgA antibody levels prior
to vaccination (15). When both the pre- and postvaccination
data were included, no correlation was obtained. In addition, we
observed a positive correlation between the PorA antigen-specific
T-cell responses and serum bactericidal activity against the 44/76
meningococcal vaccine strain (r = 0.59, P < 0.005) (Fig. 6).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Correlation between the PorA antigen-induced T-cell
proliferation (cpm) and concentrations of IgA antibodies to OMVs in
nasal secretions from 12 volunteers intranasally immunized with a
meningococcal OMV vaccine without adjuvant (15). Each symbol
represents the values obtained before or the maximum response values
obtained after vaccination for one individual.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
(Top) Correlation between the PorA antigen-induced
T-cell proliferation (cpm) and concentrations of IgG antibodies to OMVs
in serum from 12 volunteers intranasally immunized with a meningococcal
OMV vaccine without adjuvant (15). Each symbol represents
the maximum responses obtained after vaccination for one individual.
(Bottom) Correlation between the PorA antigen-induced T-cell
proliferation (cpm) and titers of serum bactericidal activity (SBA) in
the same vaccinees as in the top panel. Each symbol represents the
values obtained before or the maximum response values obtained after
vaccination for one individual. The reciprocal value of the highest
serum dilution causing more than 50% killing of an inoculum of 44/76
meningococci was recorded as the bactericidal titer, and
log2 titers are shown. External human plasma was used as
the complement source.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several candidate vaccines against serogroup B meningococcal
disease are based on membrane vesicles with different OMPs as potential
protective antigens (3, 6, 10, 26, 31). Since the Norwegian
OMV vaccine contains antigens capable of inducing protective immunity
(3) and is of a particulate nature (10), it
represents an attractive candidate antigen for investigating immune
responses induced to meningococci by mucosal delivery. In addition, the
OMV vaccine might serve as a model system for evaluating the potential
of nonreplicating mucosal vaccines to prevent bacterial diseases in
general. By applying the same mucosal immunization procedure as was
successfully used to obtain anti-OMV antibody responses in mice
(8), we have now investigated the ability of the OMV vaccine
to induce T-cell responses in humans when it is given intranasally
without additional adjuvant. Previous analysis of the humoral immune
responses observed in the same vaccinees has demonstrated that this
vaccine induces local mucosal antibodies to OMVs as well as systemic
antibodies with bactericidal activity (15).
Although the protective effector functions against extracellular
bacterial infections are believed to be mediated by antibodies, T cells
also play an important role by promoting the systemic as well as the
mucosal B-cell response in terms of Ig class switching, affinity
maturation, and magnitude of responses (2). By
monitoring T-cell proliferation against defined vaccine antigens in
vitro in the present study, we have shown that intranasal immunizations with OMVs also induced cellular immune responses in humans. The majority of the participants showed a vaccine-induced T-cell response to both OMVs (7 of 12) and the PorA antigen (11 of 12). In contrast, none of the vaccinees showed an increase in their T-cell response to
the PorB protein during the four initial immunizations. Although potential mitogenic effects of neisserial porins have been reported (23, 38), these or any other mitogenic compounds will
eventually represent only a minor and constant contribution
to the proliferation observed, since the vaccine-induced
responses were considerably higher than before the immunizations. Thus,
the results obtained showed that intranasal OMV vaccination can induce
cellular immune responses in humans, measured as T-cell proliferation
in response to OMVs and the PorA antigen.
The kinetics of the vaccine-induced cellular immune responses to both
OMVs and the PorA antigen appeared similar, with median cpm responses
peaking 1 week after the second dose and then declining to
prevaccination levels toward week 7. Although the relative increases in
median cpm seen with these antigens were approximately of the same
magnitude, the in vitro responses to the PorA antigen were superior to
those to OMVs with respect to both the pre- and maximum
postimmunization levels (Fig. 1 and 2). Since the optimal amount of
each antigen was used in the study, this difference was not due to a
concentration effect. However, any difference in antigen processing and
presentation occurring between purified and OMV-bound proteins
might have influenced the T-cell responses.
Although single individuals responded to the booster dose, only one
vaccinee showed an enhanced response to all three antigens after this
dose. However, when analyzed as a group, the vaccinees did not show a
significant response to any of the antigens tested after the booster
dose. The same observation was made with respect to both the
corresponding mucosal and systemic antibody responses (15).
The lack of an observed booster effect on the cellular as well as the
humoral immune responses might thus be due to an insufficient
immunological memory induced by the initial immunizations or to
clearance of OMVs at the mucosal level by the previously induced IgA
antibodies. In addition, the question of tolerance induction cannot at
present be excluded. However, it should be noted that the
interpretation of results based on peripheral blood mononuclear cells
in this context may be difficult, because memory T cells induced by
mucosal immunizations are probably homing to other compartments
(42). We have therefore initiated a study designed to test
for tolerance induction in mice by using a similar immunization procedure.
Bactericidal IgG antibodies in serum appear to be of primary importance
for protection against systemic meningococcal disease (5, 11, 25,
28). In addition, induction of mucosal IgA antibodies is believed
to play a role in local protection against invasion by pathogenic
bacteria through the mucosal membranes (22, 35). We have
previously demonstrated both local IgA responses in nasal secretions
and persisting IgG responses in serum with bactericidal activity in the
same vaccinees as were studied here (15). The demonstration
of a correlation between cellular immune responses and secretory IgA
levels, IgG levels in serum, and bactericidal activities suggested that
the T-cell responses described here are of putative importance for
induction of both mucosal and systemic antibody responses. These
observations are in agreement with the notion that cytokine-mediated
T-cell help is required for B cells to differentiate and produce
antibodies of the relevant isotypes (1, 2).
The results of a similar study of the cellular immune responses induced
by intramuscular vaccinations with OMVs (25 µg of protein per dose),
given in three doses with Al(OH)3 as adjuvant (24), were compared with the results obtained in the present study. After intramuscular OMV immunizations (24), the
T-cell responses to OMVs were of the same magnitude as those to PorA, but these responses were significantly higher (1 log unit difference) than those obtained by intranasal immunizations. However, the importance of this difference with respect to protection is difficult to assess.
The observation that the vaccine-induced T-cell response to the PorA
antigen was significantly higher than the PorB responses, after both
mucosal (see above) and systemic vaccination (24), is in
accordance with other studies of T-cell responses against meningococcal
porins (41), and may be due to differences in epitope
density (40, 41) or antigen processing and presentation. With respect to the humoral response, serum bactericidal activity, which is considered important for protection, correlates with the
presence of PorA antibodies after systemic OMV vaccination (29,
33, 34, 36, 44). Although monoclonal antibodies to the PorB
antigen show low bactericidal activity in animal models (30), OMV-vaccinated patients surviving systemic
meningococcal disease have been reported to show higher IgG levels
against PorB than against PorA (13, 14, 37). A possible role
of the PorB antigen in relation to vaccine protection can
therefore at present not be excluded. However, it is noteworthy that
the most pronounced T-cell response seen here was directed toward the
PorA antigen, which is considered to be important with respect to
protection against meningococcal disease.
Potential intrinsic mucosal adjuvant properties of OMVs have previously
been shown in mice by our group, with the demonstration that immune
responses to influenza virus can be enhanced by intranasal coadministration of inactivated influenza virus with OMVs
(7). Consistent with this, the results obtained in this
vaccination study showed that mucosal application of OMVs in humans can
induce B-cell (15) and T-cell responses without the use of
any additional adjuvant. These observations are in accordance with the
potential adjuvant effect of neisserial porins previously described by
others (38). Neisserial porin proteosomes have also been
shown to function as mucosal adjuvants, as demonstrated for different
model antigens delivered intranasally (17, 18, 19, 21). In
this context, our findings suggest that meningococcal OMVs may be used
as a vaccine vehicle for mucosal immunizations against heterologous antigens as well.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research project received financial support from the WHO
Global Programme for Vaccines and Immunization (GPV).
We thank Gunnhild Rødal, Randi Sandin, Anne-Lise Heistø, Elisabet
Rønnild, and Anne Klem for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Vaccinology, National Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Torshov, N-0403 Oslo, Norway. Phone: 47 22042317. Fax: 47 22042301. E-mail: fredrik.oftung{at}folkehelsa.no.
Editor:
J. R. McGhee
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abbas, A. K.,
K. M. Murphy, and A. Sher.
1996.
Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes.
Nature
383:787-793[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ada, G. L.
1990.
The immunological principles of vaccination.
Lancet
335:523-526[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bjune, G.,
A. Høiby,
J. K. Grønnesby,
O. Arnesen,
J. H. Fredriksen,
A. Halstensen,
E. Holten,
A. K. Lindbak,
H. Nøkleby,
E. Rosenqvist,
L. K. Solberg,
O. Closs,
J. Eng,
L. O. Frøholm,
A. Lystad,
L. S. Bakketeig, and B. Hareide.
1991.
Effect of outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in Norway.
Lancet
338:1093-1096[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Blake, M. S., and E. C. Gotschlich.
1982.
Purification and partial characterization of the major outer membrane proteins of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Infect. Immun.
36:277-283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boslego, J.,
J. Garcia,
C. Cruz,
W. Zollinger,
B. Brandt,
S. Ruiz,
M. Martiez,
J. Arthur,
P. Underwood,
W. Silva,
E. Moran,
W. Hankins,
J. Gilly,
J. Mays, and the Chilean National Committee for Meningococcal Disease.
1995.
Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a meningococcal vaccine group B (15:P1.3) outer membrane protein vaccine in Iquique, Chile.
Vaccine
13:821-829[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Claassen, I.,
J. Meylis,
P. van der Ley,
C. Peeters,
H. Bronst,
J. Robert,
D. Borsboom,
A. van der Ark,
I. van Straaten,
P. Roholl,
B. Kuipers, and J. T. Poolman.
1996.
Production, characterization and control of a Neisseria meningitidis hexavalent class 1 outer membrane protein containing vesicle vaccine.
Vaccine
14:1001-1008[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Dalseg, R.,
J. Holst,
T. Tangen,
G. Stabbetorp,
P. Simonsen,
E. Jantzen,
B. Haneberg,
E. Namork, and L. R. Haaheim.
1996.
Outer membrane vesicles from group B meningococci can act as mucosal adjuvant for influenza virus antigens, p. 177-182.
In
E. Brown, E. Norrby, D. Burton, and J. Mekalanos (ed.), Vaccines 96. Molecular approaches to the control of infectious diseases. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Dalseg, R.,
E. Wedege,
I. L. Haugen,
J. Holst, and B. Haneberg.
1995.
Group B meningococcal OMV vaccine as a mucosal immunogen.
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
76:93.
|
| 9.
|
Frasch, C. E.
1995.
Meningococcal vaccines, p. 245-283.
In
K. Cartwright (ed.), Meningococcal disease. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 10.
|
Fredriksen, J. H.,
E. Rosenqvist,
E. Wedege,
K. Bryn,
L. O. Frøholm,
A. K. Lindbak,
B. Møgster,
E. Namork,
E. Rye,
G. Stabbetorp,
R. Winsnes,
B. Aase, and O. Closs.
1991.
Production, characterization, and control of MenB-vaccine "Folkehelsa": an outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease.
NIPH Ann.
14:67-80[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Goldschneider, I.,
E. C. Gotschlich, and M. S. Artenstein.
1969.
Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodies.
J. Exp. Med.
129:1307-1326[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Gotschlich, E. C.
1984.
Meningococcal meningitis, p. 237-244.
In
E. Germainer (ed.), Bacterial vaccines. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
|
| 13.
|
Guttormsen, H. K.,
L. M. Wetzler, and A. Næss.
1993.
Humoral immune response to the class 3 outer membrane protein during the course of meningococcal disease.
Infect. Immun.
61:4734-4742[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Guttormsen, H.-K.,
L. M. Wetzler, and C. O. Solberg.
1994.
Humoral immune response to the class 1 outer membrane protein during the course of meningococcal disease.
Infect. Immun.
62:1473-1443.
|
| 15.
|
Haneberg, B.,
R. Dalseg,
E. Wedege,
E. A. Høiby,
I. L. Haugen,
F. Oftung,
S. R. Andersen,
L. M. Næss,
A. Aase,
T. E. Michaelsen, and J. Holst.
1998.
Intranasal administration of a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine induces persistent local mucosal antibodies and serum antibodies with strong bactericidal activity in humans.
Infect. Immun.
66:1334-1341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Høiby, E. A.,
E. Rosenqvist,
L. O. Frøholm,
G. Bjune,
B. Feiring,
H. Nøkleby, and E. Rønnild.
1991.
Bactericidal antibodies after vaccination with the Norwegian meningococcal serogroup B outer membrane vesicle vaccine: a brief survey.
NIPH Ann.
14:147-156[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Levi, R.,
E. Aboud-Pirak,
C. Leclerc,
G. H. Lowell, and R. Arnon.
1995.
Intranasal immunization of mice against influenza with synthetic peptides anchored to proteosomes.
Vaccine
13:1353-1359[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lowell, G. H.,
R. W. Kaminsky,
S. Grate,
R. E. Hunt,
C. Charney,
S. Zimmer, and C. Colleton.
1996.
Intranasal and intramuscular proteosome-staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) toxoid vaccines: immunogenicity and efficacy against lethal SEB intoxication in mice.
Infect. Immun.
64:1706-1713[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Lowell, G. H.,
R. Kaminsky,
K. Kersey,
T. Vancott,
L. Loomis,
G. Smith,
R. Redfield,
D. Freidman,
S. Amselem, and D. Birx.
1995.
Nasal immunization with HIV gp160 formulated with proteosomes, emulsomes, or cholera toxin B subunit: induction of anti gp160 serum IgA and IgG and intestinal, vaginal, and lung IgA, p. 81.
In
2nd National Conference on Human Retroviruses and Related Infections.
|
| 20.
|
Lystad, A., and S. Aasen.
1991.
The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Norway 1975-91.
NIPH Ann.
14:57-66[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Malett, C. P.,
T. L. Hale,
R. W. Kaminsky,
T. Larsen,
N. Orr,
D. Cohen, and G. H. Lowell.
1995.
Intranasal and intragastric immunization with proteosome-Shigella lipopolysaccharide vaccines protects against lethal pneumonia in a murine model of Shigella infection.
Infect. Immun.
63:2382-2386[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
McGhee, J. R.,
J. Mestecky,
M. T. Dertzbaugh,
J. H. Eldridge,
M. Hirasawa, and H. Kiyono.
1992.
The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development.
Vaccine
10:75-88[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Melancon, J.,
R. A. Murgita, and I. W. DeVoe.
1983.
Activation of murine B lymphocytes by Neisseria meningitidis and isolated meningococcal surface antigens.
Infect. Immun.
42:471-479[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Meyer Næss, L.,
F. Oftung,
A. Aase,
R. Sandin,
L. E. Wetzler, and T. Michaelsen.
1998.
Human T cell responses after vaccination with the Norwegian group B meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine.
Infect. Immun.
66:959-965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Milagres, L. G.,
S. R. Ramos,
C. T. Sacchi,
C. E. A. Melles,
V. S. D. Vieira,
H. Sato,
G. S. Brito,
J. C. Moraec, and C. E. Frasch.
1994.
Immune response of Brazilian children to a Neisseria meningitis serogroup B outer membrane protein vaccine: comparison with efficacy.
Infect. Immun.
62:4419-4424[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Peeters, C. C. A. M.,
H. C. Rümke,
L. C. Sundermann,
E. M. Rouppe van der Voort,
J. Meulenbelt,
M. Schuller,
A. J. Kuipers,
P. van der Ley, and J. T. Poolman.
1996.
Phase I clinical trial with a hexavalent PorA containing meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine.
Vaccine
14:1009-1015[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Peltola, H. P. H.
1983.
Meningococcal disease: still with us.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
5:71-91[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Perkins, B. A.,
K. Jonsdottir,
H. Briem,
E. Griffiths,
B. D. Plikaytis,
E. A. Høiby,
E. Rosenqvist,
J. Holst,
H. Nøkleby,
F. Sotolongo,
G. Sierra,
C. Huergo,
G. M. Carlone,
D. Williams,
J. Dykes,
D. Kapczynski,
E. Thikomirov,
J. D. Wenger, and C. V. Broome.
1998.
Immunogenicity of two efficacious outer membrane protein-based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines among young adults in Iceland.
J. Infect. Dis.
177:683-691[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Rosenqvist, E.,
E. A. Høiby,
E. Wedege,
K. Bryn,
J. Kolberg,
A. Klem,
E. Rønnild,
G. Bjune, and H. Nøkleby.
1995.
Human antibody responses to meningococcal outer membrane antigens after three doses of the Norwegian group B meningococcal vaccine.
Infect. Immun.
63:4642-4652[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Saukkonen, K. M.,
M. Leinonen,
H. Abdillahi, and J. T. Poolman.
1989.
Comparative evaluation of potential components for group B meningococcal vaccine by passive protection in the infant rat and in vitro bactericidal assay.
Vaccine
7:325-328[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sierra, G. V. G.,
H. C. Campa,
N. M. Vacacel,
I. L. Garcia,
P. L. Izquierdo,
P. F. Sotolongo,
G. V. Casanueva,
C. O. Rico,
C. R. Rodriguez, and M. H. Terry.
1991.
Vaccine against group B Neisseria meningitidis: protection trial and mass vaccination results in Cuba.
NIPH Ann.
14:195-210[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Tsai, C. M.
1986.
The analysis of lipopolysaccharide vaccines by silver staining following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
J. Biol. Stand.
14:25-33[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
van der Voort, E. R.,
P. van der Ley,
J. van der Biezen,
S. George,
O. Tunnela,
H. van Dijken,
B. Kuipers, and J. Poolman.
1996.
Specificity of human bactericidal antibodies against PorA P1.7, 16 induced with a hexavalent meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine.
Infect. Immun.
64:2745-2751[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
van der Voort, E. R.,
H. van Dijken,
B. Kuipers,
J. van der Biezen,
P. van der Ley,
J. Meylis,
I. Claassen, and J. T. Poolman.
1997.
Human B- and T-cell responses after immunization with a hexavalent PorA meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine.
Infect. Immun.
65:5184-5190[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Walker, R. I.
1994.
New strategies for using mucosal vaccination to achieve more effective immunization.
Vaccine
12:387-400[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Wedege, E., and L. O. Frøholm.
1986.
Human antibody response to a group B serotype 2a meningococcal vaccine determined by immunoblotting.
Infect. Immun.
51:571-578[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Wedege, E.,
E. A. Høiby,
E. Rosenqvist, and G. Bjune.
1998.
Immune responses against major outer membrane antigens of Neisseria meningitidis in vaccinees and controls who contracted meningococcal disease during the Norwegian serogroup B protection trial.
Infect. Immun.
66:3223-3231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Wetzler, L. M.,
Y. Ho, and H. Reiser.
1996.
Neisserial porins induce B lymphocytes to express costimulatory B7-2 molecules and to proliferate.
J. Exp. Med.
183:1151-1159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Wetzler, L. M.,
M. S. Blake,
K. Barry, and E. C. Gotschlich.
1992.
Gonococcal porin vaccine evaluation: comparison of Por proteosomes, liposomes and blebs isolated from rmp deletions mutants.
J. Infect. Dis.
166:551-555[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
J. A. M. van Gaans-van den Brink,
H. Gausepohl,
A. Procknicka-Chalufour,
P. Hoogerhout, and J. T. Poolman.
1992.
Identification of T cell epitopes occurring in a meningococcal class 1 outer membrane protein using overlapping peptides assembled with simultaneous multiple peptide synthesis.
J. Exp. Med.
176:79-88[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Wiertz, E. J. H. J.,
J. A. M. van Gaans-van den Brink,
G. M. T. H. Schreuder,
A. A. M. Termijtelen,
P. Hoogerhout, and J. T. Poolman.
1991.
T cell recognition of Neisseria meningitidis class 1 outer membrane proteins.
J. Immunol.
147:2012-2018[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Williams, M. B., and E. C. Butcher.
1997.
Homing of naive and memory T-lymphocyte subsets to Peyer's patches, lymph nodes, and spleen.
J. Immunol.
159:1746-1752[Abstract].
|
| 43.
|
Wyle, F. E.,
M. S. Artenstein,
B. L. Brandt,
E. C. Tramont,
D. L. Kasper,
P. L. Altieri,
S. L. Berman, and J. P. Lowenthal.
1972.
Immunological response in man to group B meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines.
J. Infect. Dis.
126:514-522[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Zollinger, W., and E. Moran.
1991.
Meningococcal vaccines present and future.
Trans. Royal Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
85:37-43.
|
Infection and Immunity, February 1999, p. 921-927, Vol. 67, No. 2
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Malley, R., Srivastava, A., Lipsitch, M., Thompson, C. M., Watkins, C., Tzianabos, A., Anderson, P. W.
(2006). Antibody-Independent, Interleukin-17A-Mediated, Cross-Serotype Immunity to Pneumococci in Mice Immunized Intranasally with the Cell Wall Polysaccharide. Infect. Immun.
74: 2187-2195
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Johansen, F.-E., Baekkevold, E. S., Carlsen, H. S., Farstad, I. N., Soler, D., Brandtzaeg, P.
(2005). Regional induction of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors explains disparate homing of human B cells to systemic and mucosal effector sites: dispersion from tonsils. Blood
106: 593-600
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meiring, H. D., Kuipers, B., van Gaans-van den Brink, J. A. M., Poelen, M. C. M., Timmermans, H., Baart, G., Brugghe, H., van Schie, J., Boog, C. J. P., de Jong, A. P. J. M., van Els, C. A. C. M.
(2005). Mass Tag-Assisted Identification of Naturally Processed HLA Class II-Presented Meningococcal Peptides Recognized by CD4+ T Lymphocytes. J. Immunol.
174: 5636-5643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bakke, H., Lie, K., Haugen, I. L., Korsvold, G. E., Hoiby, E. A., Nass, L. M., Holst, J., Aaberge, I. S., Oftung, F., Haneberg, B.
(2001). Meningococcal Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Given Intranasally Can Induce Immunological Memory and Booster Responses without Evidence of Tolerance. Infect. Immun.
69: 5010-5015
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dixon, G. L. J., Newton, P. J., Chain, B. M., Katz, D., Andersen, S. R., Wong, S., van der Ley, P., Klein, N., Callard, R. E.
(2001). Dendritic Cell Activation and Cytokine Production Induced by Group B Neisseria meningitidis: Interleukin-12 Production Depends on Lipopolysaccharide Expression in Intact Bacteria. Infect. Immun.
69: 4351-4357
[Abstract]
[Full Text]