Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, May 1999, p. 2178-2183, Vol. 67, No. 5
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Transient Transcriptional Activation of the
Vibrio cholerae El Tor Virulence Regulator ToxT in
Response to Culture Conditions
Ana I.
Medrano,1,2
Victor J.
DiRita,3
Gabriela
Castillo,2 and
Joaquin
Sanchez1,2,*
Facultad de Medicina, UAEM, Cuernavaca,
Morelos, Mexico 62210,1 Centro de
Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, INSP, Cuernavaca,
Morelos, Mexico 62508,2 and Unit for
Laboratory Animal Medicine and Department of Microbiology and
Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 481093
Received 18 November 1998/Returned for modification 12 January
1999/Accepted 9 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Vibrio cholerae El Tor require special in vitro culture
conditions, consisting of an initial static growth period followed by
shift to shaking (AKI conditions), for expression of cholera toxin (CT)
and toxin coregulated pili (TCP). ToxT, a regulator whose initial
transcription depends on the ToxR regulator, positively modulates
expression of CT and TCP. To help understand control of CT and TCP in
El Tor vibrios, we monitored ctxAB and ToxR-dependent toxT transcription by time course primer extension assays.
AKI conditions stimulated CT synthesis with an absence of
ctxAB transcription during static growth followed by
induction upon shaking. ToxR-dependent toxT transcription
was induced at the end of the static growth period but was transient,
stopping shortly after shaking was initiated but, interestingly, also
if the static phase was prolonged. Immunoblot assays showed that ToxR
protein levels were not coincidentally transient, implying a protein
on/off switch mechanism for ToxR. Despite the transient activation by
ToxR, transcription of ctxAB was maintained during shaking.
This finding suggested continued toxT expression, possibly
through relay transcription from another promoter. The 12.6-kb distant
upstream tcpA promoter responsible for expression of the
TCP operon has been proposed to provide an alternate toxT
message by readthrough transcription. Activation of the
tcpA promoter is supported by increased expression of TcpA protein during the shaking phase of the culture. Readthrough
transcription of toxT from tcpA would be
compatible with reverse transcription-PCR evidence for a
toxT mRNA at times when ToxR-dependent transcription was no
longer detectable by primer extension.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cholera is caused by the human
pathogen Vibrio cholerae O1, a gram-negative bacterium that
colonizes the small intestine of its host. It is known that
environmental stimuli affect the control of virulence gene expression
in V. cholerae. It has been theorized that the function of
this regulation may be to optimize energy expenditure for vibrios to
achieve a successful infection. One of the most important V. cholerae virulence factors is cholera toxin (CT). CT is the main
factor responsible for the abundant fluid loss that characterizes the
disease. CT is a prototype ADP-ribosylating enterotoxin encoded by the
ctxAB operon, which resides in the genome of a filamentous,
lysogenic phage called CTX
(35). In addition to CT, there
are other virulence factors associated with the pathogenicity of
V. cholerae, whose expression is coordinately regulated by
an activator called ToxR (7, 9, 32). Because of this
coordinated regulation, genes controlled by ToxR are collectively termed the ToxR regulon (26). It has been proposed that
ToxR, which is a membrane-located transcriptional activator, mediates regulation of virulence gene expression in response to external changes
in osmolarity, nutrients, and pH (8). Proof of the important
role of ToxR is that strains with null mutations in toxR are
deficient in virulence factor production and are avirulent (25). Reduction in virulence factor expression has now been shown to be due largely to the inability to produce a second regulator, ToxT, which is considered the direct effector of most of the
ToxR-regulated transcription. This has led to the proposal of a cascade
model to explain virulence gene regulation in V. cholerae
(9). ToxT is an AraC-like protein that activates several
virulence genes in the ToxR regulon (9, 29). The
carboxyl-terminal domain of ToxT has a helix-turn-helix motif,
characteristic of this family of activators, but its amino terminus
does not show significant similarity to other AraC-like proteins
(14). Although early work (7, 22) suggested that
both ToxR and ToxT independently activate transcription of
ctxAB, more recent work indicates ctxAB is
activated solely by ToxT in V. cholerae, raising a question of the precise role of ToxR in ctxAB control (5,
10). ToxT also controls the expression of the toxin coregulated
pilus (TCP) and of the accessory colonization factor (acf)
genes (9).
The toxT gene possesses one proximal ToxR-dependent
promoter. Sequences within this promoter contain a specific binding
site for the ToxR protein, as shown by in vitro gel shift and
footprinting experiments (5a, 16). Apart from the proximal
toxT promoter, a second message for ToxT can be generated
from the distal tcpA promoter that controls expression of
the TCP gene cluster, which includes the toxT gene itself
(2, 36). The finding of decreased toxT mRNA
levels in a tcpA promoter mutant (36) supports
toxT transcription from this promoter. Because ToxT induces
tcpA expression, transcriptional readthrough from this
promoter provides a self-regulatory mechanism for toxT
(2, 36).
The two major biotypes of V. cholerae, classical and El Tor,
each require ToxR and ToxT for activation of virulence factors, and
potential regulatory sequences are largely conserved between the two
biotypes. Nevertheless, the mechanism controlling expression of
toxT appears to be biotype specific (10), because
classical strains express CT and TCP under a wide range of experimental conditions, while El Tor strains require specific growth conditions, termed AKI, for detectable expression of the ToxR regulon (10, 17,
21). Such conditions comprise a biphasic culture where vibrios
are first statistically grown for a 4-h period and then shifted to
shaking (17). The recent finding that toxT
expression from the inducible tacP promoter in El Tor makes
CT synthesis essentially independent of AKI culturing immediately
suggested a direct involvement of the ToxR/ToxT system (10).
In classical strains, which have more permissive growth requirements
for expression of the ToxR regulon, the relative contributions of ToxR
and ToxT to transcription of toxT have been thoroughly
analyzed (36), but analysis of how ToxR and ToxT participate
in modulating toxT and ctxAB transcription under
AKI culture conditions is not known. To gain insight into the molecular
basis for control of CT and TCP production in V. cholerae El
Tor, we performed experiments analyzing toxT and
ctxAB transcription over time during AKI growth.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
Strains were maintained at
70°C in LB
medium containing 20% glycerol. The classical V. cholerae
strain O395 was grown at 30°C in LB medium, and the V. cholerae El Tor strain E7946 was grown at 37°C in AKI medium
(17) without sodium bicarbonate (18). The
classical strain was used to generate a toxT primer extension product used as a reference to estimate the sizes of the
toxT and ctxA primer extension products from the
El Tor strain.
RNA isolation and primer extensions.
To isolate RNA from the
classical strain, bacteria were harvested from cultures prepared by a
1:100 dilution of an overnight culture into 50 ml of fresh LB medium
for growth under orbital shaking for 2 to 5 h at 30°C. For RNA
isolation from the El Tor bacteria, scaled-up cultures (11)
were used so as to obtain sufficient material from the early time
points and from low-density cultures. Scaled-up cultures designed to be
equivalent to 10-ml cultures in 15- by 150-mm tubes (17)
were carried out with 500-ml medium volumes placed in a 500-ml
cylinder. Medium was inoculated with a 100-µl volume of a bacterial
suspension with an A600 reading of 1.0. The
cylinder was statically incubated at 37°C for 4 h, after which
the culture was poured into a prewarmed 2-liter flask to continue
growth under orbital shaking (200 rpm) for an additional 6 h (AKI
conditions). We defined non-AKI conditions as those where cultures were
either kept without shaking (prolonged static growth) or shaken without
a prior static growth period (continuous shaking). For the prolonged
static growth condition, the culture was maintained in the cylinder;
for continuous shaking, the 500-ml culture was orbitally shaken from
the start in the 2-liter flask. From each of these cultures, 25- to
50-ml aliquots were removed every hour, poured over ice, and
centrifuged for cell recovery. Collected bacteria were usually stored
overnight at
20°C, and RNA extractions were carried out the
following day. RNA was obtained from bacterial pellets by using TRIzol
reagent (GIBCO-BRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. At
the end of the procedure, RNA concentrations were in all cases adjusted
to 5 µg/µl on the basis of A260
measurements. This compensated for differences in bacterial density
among time points within a growth curve as well as for differences
between cultures. RNA aliquots were additionally run in agarose gels to further check for RNA concentrations; these estimates were always consistent with A260 values. Primer extensions
for toxT and ctxA transcripts were performed as
described previously (15), using toxT primer
5'-CATTAGTTTGAAAAGATTTTTTTCCCAATCAT-3', where
the underlined triplet is complementary to the ATG codon for the first amino acid in ToxT. The ctxA-specific primer was
5'-GAATCTGCCGATATAACTTATCATCATTTGCAT-3', where
the underlined nucleotides are complementary to the codon for amino
acid 8 in the mature CtxA protein sequence. For autoradiographic detection of primer extension products (15), denaturing
acrylamide gels were run, loading 5 µl of the primer extension
reaction mixture per well in all experiments.
RT-PCR.
Evidence for the presence of a toxT mRNA
was obtained by treating aliquots from the RNA samples with murine
leukemia virus (MLV) reverse transcriptase (RT) followed by PCR with
AmpliTaq polymerase, using a GenAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. To control for the
absence of contaminating template DNA in RNA samples, a PCR was run for each of the tested samples, using the same kit components but omitting
the MLV RT. Lack of amplification in the absence of RT confirmed that
the PCR products were generated from cDNAs. The upstream primer used
for RT-PCR of toxT mRNA was
5'-CTTTACGTGGATCCCTCTCTGCG-3', where the
underlined G hybridizes at position
31 with respect to the initiation
codon ATG. The downstream primer was
5'-CTACCCAACTGCAGTGATACAATC-3', where the
underlined triplet is the complementary sequence to the
toxT stop codon (TAG). For the control ctxA
RT-PCR, the upstream primer was
5'-CGTTTGGATCCAGGGAGCATTATATGGTAAAG-3', where
the underlined triplet corresponds to the start codon, and the
downstream primer was
5'-GCGATAAGCTTCATAATTCATCCTGAATTC-3', where the
underlined nucleotides correspond to the complementary stop codon
sequence for ctxA.
Immunoblots.
Detection of the ToxR protein throughout the
AKI culture was done with bacterial cell pellets collected at the same
time points as for RNA aliquots. Due to low bacterial concentrations at
the early time points, the amount of sample needed for protein
measurements and immunoblots required the processing of relatively
large culture volumes. However, processing of culture volumes with low
bacterial density provided insufficient material due to poor pelleting
during centrifugation. For maximal sample saving, we opted to normalize aliquots by estimating bacterial concentrations through
A600. Volumes of bacterial pellets were adjusted
according to A600 values, and aliquots were
directly resuspended in electrophoresis sample buffer. Cell contents
were released by boiling, and samples were loaded in sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Separated proteins were electrotransferred
to nitrocellulose, and immunoreactive protein bands were developed by
standard techniques using anti-ToxR rabbit antiserum (kindly provided
by J. Mekalanos, Harvard University), peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit
immunoglobulin G (Miles Laboratories), and chloronaphthol substrate. A
commercial molecular weight marker (High Molecular Range Rainbow
Marker; Amersham) was used to confirm the expected position for the
ToxR immunoreactive band.
Immunodetection of TcpA.
For TcpA detection, bacterial
pellets obtained from 50-ml culture aliquots for h 3 and 4 and from
1.5-ml aliquots for subsequent hours were resuspended in 100 µl of
phosphate-buffered saline. Resuspended cells were lysed by repeated
freeze-thawing, and total protein contents were adjusted to the same
value according to protein determinations using a commercial protein
determination kit (Bio-Rad). Samples of 5 µl were directly placed on
nitrocellulose paper, and TcpA was assayed by in situ reaction with
anti-TcpA monoclonal antibody (MAb) 20:2 (20), anti-mouse
immunoglobulin G-peroxidase conjugate, and chloronaphthol substrate by
standard techniques. Attempts to detect TcpA with MAb 20:2 by Western
blotting were not successful due to poor reactivity with the El Tor TCP in this assay (20).
Detection of CT.
Detection of CT was done on culture
supernatants and in bacterial pellets. Bacterial pellets from 1 ml of
culture were resuspended in 500 µl of PBS, and cell contents were
released by three ultrasonication bursts on ice. Supernatants and
sonicates were twofold serially diluted and assayed by GM1
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (30), using a MAb
LT39 reactive with the B subunit of CT (31), using either CT
(Sigma) or the B subunit of CT (27) at 1 µg/ml as the standard.
 |
RESULTS |
Growth of V. cholerae El Tor under AKI and non-AKI
conditions.
Figure 1 presents the
growth curves for strain E7946 under standard AKI conditions, prolonged
static growth, and continuous shaking. As seen, the highest growth rate
was achieved by continuous shaking. Culturing under AKI conditions also
resulted in a high growth rate, but this was dependent on initiation of
the shaking phase at h 5. The prolonged static growth culture reached
A600s of 0.148 at h 4 and 0.22 at h 5. From this
time onward, increases in absorbance were minor, indicating that the
early stationary phase had been reached. Based on the latter
observation, and to avoid excessive incubation of this culture, a 10-h
point to conclude the experiment was chosen. According to previous
experiments, this point in time was found to correspond to the early
stationary phase for the cultures under the other two growth
conditions. The 10-h incubation period seemed also physiologically
adequate in terms of CT production because toxin concentrations at this time and after overnight growth were practically the same.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth curves of V. cholerae El Tor E7946
under AKI and non-AKI conditions. Cultures were grown in AKI medium at
37°C under prolonged static growth (Static growth), continuous
shaking (Shaking) or by the AKI method (AKI cond.).
|
|
Expression of toxT and ctxAB in V. cholerae El Tor.
RNA samples prepared from culture aliquots
taken every hour were subjected to primer extension using
toxT- and ctxA-specific primers. Figure
2 shows ToxR-dependent primer extension
products and CT levels for h 2 to 8 and h 10. The toxT
primer extension product was abundant at h 4 and 5 but was no longer
detectable after this point. We observed induction of ctxAB
transcription as soon as the culture was shifted to shaking (Fig. 2).
Also, transfer to shaking quickly led to production of CT and its
release into the culture supernatant (Fig. 2). CT concentrations
paralleled the increase in intensity of the primer extension product
from ctxAB. In contrast, and in agreement with experiments
that defined AKI conditions (17), growth under continuous
shaking resulted in practically undetectable levels of CT. This was
reflected in undetectable levels of both toxT and
ctxAB primer extension products (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Primer extension products from toxT and
ctxAB, and CT levels under AKI conditions. Incubation
periods under static growth or shaking phases of an AKI growth are
indicated with the double-headed arrows. A composite figure using
relevant sections of autoradiographs was constructed to facilitate
comparisons. The respective primer extension products are labeled at
the left. (B) CT values from GM1 ELISA. Concentrations shown are
expressed as equivalents of standard CT per culture supernatant volume
unit. Levels of CT in cell pellets were less than 3 ng/ml in all
cases.
|
|
The results for
toxT transcription under prolonged static
growth were similar to those for AKI conditions, with the
toxT primer
extension product appearing at h 4 and
disappearing after h 5,
except for a comparably lower-intensity primer
extension band
at this last time (Fig.
3). Under prolonged static growth, there
was a virtual absence of the
ctxAB primer extension product,
except
for a very faint band at h 4 (Fig.
3). This faint band was also
visible in the AKI culture (Fig.
2), suggesting a low basal activity
of
ToxT over
ctxAB transcription before the start of the
shaking
culture phase.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Primer extension products from toxT and
ctxAB under prolonged static growth. Relevant sections of
autoradiographs were used to compose the figure and to facilitate
comparisons. Samples obtained at different times during culture, as
indicated above the lanes, were subjected to primer extension for
toxT (upper panel) and ctxAB (lower panel). A
barely visible primer extension band was found at h 4 for
ctxAB.
|
|
Detection of the ToxR protein under AKI conditions.
To assess
ToxR levels through AKI growth, samples of total proteins obtained from
time point aliquots throughout the AKI growth curve were analyzed on
immunoblots probed with anti-ToxR antiserum (Fig.
4). As seen, the presence of ToxR in
cells was detected from h 2 and until h 10. Although some minor
variability in the intensity of immunoreactive bands was observed, the
experiment demonstrates that ToxR was present during both the static
growth and shaking culture phases. Of significance was the fact that ToxR was present during shaking and especially after h 6 (Fig. 4). This
is particularly meaningful because in the 6- to 10-h interval the
ToxR-dependent toxT primer extension product was undetectable (Fig. 2). This suggests that transient toxT
transcription is not due to an effect of AKI conditions on
toxR gene expression but rather depends on the ability of
ToxR to activate the toxT gene.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Immunoblot detection of ToxR along the AKI growth curve.
To compensate for differences in protein concentration between time
points, bacterial cells were lysed by direct boiling in variable
volumes of sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Materials and
Methods). Times at which aliquots were removed from the AKI culture are
indicated above the lanes. Positions for reference protein bands in a
commercial molecular weight marker are shown on the left.
|
|
RT-PCR detection of toxT transcripts.
Experiments
with classical strains of V. cholerae suggest that after
transient ToxR-dependent toxT transcription, toxT
transcripts are maintained in the cell, evidently as a result of
ToxT-dependent transcription of a large, polycistronic mRNA initiating
at the tcpA promoter (36). A similar model could
account for the sustained ctxAB transcription during shaking
that we observe in the absence of activated ToxR-dependent expression
of toxT detectable by primer extension. To determine if this
could be so, RNA aliquots from h 6 to 10 were subjected to RT-PCR.
Figure 5 shows toxT RT-PCR products whose sizes were compatible with binding of primers at both
ends of the toxT structural gene. This experiment
demonstrates the presence of a toxT mRNA at times when
toxT mRNA arising from de novo activation by ToxR is
undetectable. Control reactions in the absence of MLV RT gave no
amplification products, confirming the absence of contaminating DNA in
samples. An example of a control reaction is shown in Fig. 5.
Additional confirmation of successful mRNA detection was obtained by
concurrent RT-PCRs with ctxA primers. Similar to results
shown, ctxA amplification products were obtained at the same
time points (not shown).

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Detection of a toxT transcript by RT-PCR
during h 6 to 10 of an AKI culture. An ethidium bromide-stained agarose
electrophoresis gel is presented. Samples: 1Kb, 1-kb molecular weight
marker (Promega); C, example control RT-PCR from an RNA sample (5-h
time point) in the absence of RT; 6h to 10h, RT-PCR of RNA samples from
h 6 to 10 of an AKI culture (shaking phase). Note that except for the
control RNA, all samples corresponded to times at which no
ToxR-dependent toxT transcript was detected by primer
extension (see Fig. 2).
|
|
Immunodetection of TcpA.
The tcpA promoter is
required for optimal toxT expression and high CT levels in
classical V. cholerae. This is because transcription initiating at this promoter results in a large polycistronic message that includes toxT at the 3' end (2, 36). As a
measure of tcpA induction in our El Tor cultures under AKI
conditions, and, by extension, a measure of toxT
transcription from the tcpA promoter occurring after
transient activation by ToxR, we followed expression of the TcpA
protein by dot blotting using a MAb against TcpA (20). Hourly aliquots were obtained from h 3 to 10, and TcpA levels were
determined by immunoblotting. Results in Fig.
6 show that TcpA was present at all
sampled times, although initiation of the shaking culture phase
strongly stimulated TcpA production (Fig. 6, 5 h). After this
point in time, TcpA levels remained essentially constant (Fig. 6, 5 to
10 h). Since TcpA synthesis is strongly induced by the presence of
ToxT in the cell (2), continued expression of TcpA during
shaking would suggest sustained expression of toxT. However,
toxT transcription from its ToxR-dependent promoter was no
longer detectable by primer extension after h 6 (Fig. 2). These results
could be reconciled if there were toxT transcription
initiating from tcpA during the shaking culture phase in a
manner similar to that described for classical strains under non-AKI
conditions (36) (see Discussion).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Detection by dot blotting of TcpA in bacterial cell
lysates from an AKI culture. Times at which aliquots were obtained are
indicated above the dots. Incubation periods under static growth or
shaking are indicated with the double-headed arrows.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The expression of CT under AKI conditions has been the subject of
recent experiments aimed at explaining the role of the positive regulator ToxT in CT production by V. cholerae El Tor
(10). Here we provide evidence for a delicately concerted
regulation of ToxT by ToxR through a transient transcription of the
toxT gene, not previously detected if AKI cultures were
sampled at a later time (10). Transient transcription
apparently takes place in response to the combination of static growth
and culture cell density because induction occurred during the static
period and at the early stationary phase. These results are in
agreement with the initial physiological studies performed by Iwanaga
et al., who showed that a 4-h static growth period followed by strong aeration was optimal to stimulate CT production in V. cholerae El Tor (17, 18). We found that ToxR-driven
transcription of toxT was initiated precisely at the h 4 yet
expression was transient, continuing for only 1 h during shaking.
This result indicated that ToxR was unable to sustain its positive
effect over toxT transcription. Irrespective of this,
transfer of cultures to shaking stimulated transcription of
ctxAB, along with the appearance of CT in the medium.
Interestingly, when cultures were not shifted to shaking but instead
continued under static growth, the toxT primer extension
product also disappeared after h 5 (Fig. 3). This finding indicated
that ToxR was unable to maintain positive regulation over
toxT also when the static growth phase was prolonged. Thereby, positive regulation of toxT by ToxR seems to occur
only within a narrow physiological window sensitive to either strong aeration or prolonged static growth. We propose that the ToxR response
involves a change in its ability to activate the toxT promoter, as opposed to modulation of toxR gene expression,
because immunoblot experiments showed the ToxR protein was produced
throughout the AKI culture (Fig. 4). Especially meaningful was the fact
that ToxR was present after h 6, times at which activation of
toxT transcription by ToxR was no longer detectable by
primer extension (Fig. 2). These results are in agreement with the
previous report of ToxR expression in El Tor vibrios regardless of
growth conditions (10). An on/off switch for ToxR (ToxR/S)
activity would be a simple model to explain transcriptional control of
toxT from the promoter directly upstream (Fig.
7). In this switch model, we propose that
at h 4 and 5, ToxR is in its on condition and that shaking or prolonged
static growth beyond this point induces the ToxR off status (Fig. 7).
Switching between on and off stages could be proposed to involve
changes between ToxR-ToxR and/or ToxR-ToxS dimeric and monomeric
molecular species (8, 24). However, induction or
deactivation of ToxR may require the participation of other regulators
since simple changes in amounts of dimeric versus monomeric forms do
not account for ToxR responses to environmental stimuli in classical
vibrios (24). Likely candidates that could affect ToxR
control over toxT are TcpP and TcpH. Mutations in tcpH result in undetectable or reduced ToxR-dependent
toxT transcription and CT synthesis in the classical
V. cholerae strain O395 (3, 36), while TcpP
stimulates toxT transcription in 0395 (13). Furthermore, a positive synergistic effect on toxT
transcription has been observed when both TcpP and TcpH are present in
the cell (13). This has led to the hypothesis that TcpP and
TcpH constitute a positive regulatory system functionally similar to
the ToxR/S system (13). Analysis of tcpP mutants
in O395 showed that ToxR-dependent toxT transcription
normally requires the joint action of both TcpP and ToxR (21a,
36). In view of this, it is quite possible that the proposed
on/off ToxR switch involves TcpP, perhaps through the formation of a
complex consisting of TcpP/H and ToxR/S. Experiments are under way to
test this hypothesis.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Hypothetical model for the role of ToxR in the V. cholerae El Tor response to AKI conditions. Boxes represent genes,
and arrows above them indicate promoters as well as direction of
transcription. The discontinuous arrow represents genes located between
tcpA and toxT in the TCP operon (2).
Wavy lines symbolize mRNAs. Other arrows indicate transition between
ToxR states or mRNA translation. The ToxT protein (filled oval) is
shown above the tcpA and ctxAB promoters to
indicate its role as a transcriptional inducer of both genes (2,
9). A diagrammatic representation of CT is included. The
postulated on status of ToxR (ToxR/S), induced by static growth, is
represented by dashed ovals; the postulated off status, induced by
shift to shaking, or by prolonged static growth, is represented by
dashed squares. A potential participation of TcpP/H (+TcpP/H?) in
promoting the on status is indicated. Positive modulation by TcpP/H
under AKI conditions would not disagree with previous reports on TcpP/H
stimulation of ToxR-dependent toxT transcription (3,
13, 23, 33). A potential contribution to ctxAB
expression by ToxR/S is indicated with a dashed arrow.
|
|
According to early work (7, 22), the sustained
ctxAB transcription observed (Fig. 2), in spite of reduction
or absence of the ToxR-dependent toxT transcription, could
be explained by direct action of ToxR over ctxAB. However,
recent studies point to major, and perhaps exclusive, activation of
ctxAB by ToxT in V. cholerae (5, 10).
Lack of an independent ToxR activity on ctxAB in our studies
is supported by the fact that VJ739 (5), a
ToxT
ToxR+ mutant of El Tor strain E7946, was
unable to produce CT when grown in parallel and under the same AKI
conditions (data not shown). This implies the need to account for
induction of ctxAB transcription through control of ToxT
levels in the cell. Maintained ToxT concentrations could be due to
low-level transcription from the same promoter that was undetectable;
nonetheless, low-level transcription would seem insufficient to account
for the strong ctxAB transcription observed (Fig. 2). The
need of de novo synthesis to maintain ToxT levels in the cell appears
likely. First, ToxT dilution due to mass increase during growth would
imply an inverse relation between ToxT activity and protein
concentration. Second, ToxT has proven highly labile in purification
schemes applied to classical V. cholerae strains
(7a), which may suggest that the protein is inherently
unstable. An alternative to ToxR-dependent activation for sustaining
ToxT production would be through the presence of toxT
message by readthrough transcription from a different promoter.
A candidate promoter located 12.6 kb upstream of the toxT
gene and in front of the tcpA gene, the first of 12 contiguous genes in the TCP operon, has been proposed to generate a
long mRNA containing a transcript for ToxT in the classical strain O395
(2). Although a 12- to 13-kb-long message has not formally
been shown, a tcpA-dependent message, containing both the
upstream tcpF and toxT transcripts, has been
demonstrated by RNase protection studies (2). Moreover, because toxT activates tcpA, a positive feedback
effect has been proposed and theorized to represent a self-regulatory
mechanism for ToxT (2). This is in full agreement with the
recent observation that the tcpA promoter in O395 is
required for maximal toxT transcription and CT production
(36). That transcription from tcpA plays a role
in AKI cultures is supported by the fact that TCP synthesis in El Tor
vibrios is positively stimulated by those culture conditions (10,
21). In this report, we provide evidence in support of toxT transcription from the tcpA promoter. We
detected a transcript for the structural toxT gene by RT-PCR
(Fig. 5) at times when ToxR-dependent toxT primer extension
product was undetectable (h 6 to 10). Attempts to demonstrate that this
transcript comes from the hypothetical polycistronic TCP mRNA by
RT-PCRs using commercial enzymes specially designed to obtain products
longer than 12 kb were not successful. This failure could be due to
mRNA processing at internal positions within the TCP operon and/or to
an unstable message (2). In view of this difficulty, and considering that in O395 tcpA expression has been found to
closely correlate with transcription of the whole operon including
tcpJ the gene lying immediately downstream of
toxT (2), we assayed for the presence of TcpA by
dot blot experiments. We found synchronous induction of TcpA production
(Fig. 6) coincident with ctxAB transcription throughout the
shaking culture phase. This finding is in complete agreement with
primer extension experiments showing that very little tcpA
transcript is made before h 4, with an increase in level after this
time point; thereafter the level is maintained throughout the rest of
the culture (21b).
Because ToxT activates tcpA and we found increases in TcpA,
it follows that high TcpA concentrations may be due to the presence of
higher than basal ToxT levels in the cell. In the virtual absence of
ToxR-dependent transcription (Fig. 2), higher ToxT levels could be
explained by the same self-dependent readthrough transcription mechanism operating in classical strains (36).
This hypothesis is summarized in a model presented in Fig. 7. The model
includes the above-discussed on/off switch mechanism for ToxR and
proposes to account for the role of ToxR (ToxR/S) and ToxT in the
response of V. cholerae El Tor to AKI conditions. We have
incorporated in the model the above-discussed potential participation
of the positive regulators TcpP and TcpH (13), indicating
that they could enhance the effect of ToxR (ToxR/S) over the
toxT promoter (Fig. 7). Completion of the model will require
determining if the differences in activity between TcpP/H from
classical and El Tor vibrios (4) is of relevance to this system. It will also be helpful to define if the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP
receptor protein complex and TcpI, both of which are negative TCP
operon regulators in classical strains (28, 29), contribute to the final steady-state levels of ToxT in El Tor vibrios. However, the proposal for TcpI as a negative tcpA regulator has been
questioned (33). Finally, the reason for the requirement of
a shaking culture phase to induce ctxAB transcription
remains to be determined.
In terms of the biomedical relevance of results here presented, it is
clear that the V. cholerae El Tor response to external stimuli seems exquisitely sensitive and most appropriately designed to
express CT only when certain growth conditions are met. Such conditions
appear to include the bacterial population status and suggest that
V. cholerae senses its own cell density in the intestine (19), in analogy to quorum sensing by phylogenetically
related bacteria (1). If this type of sensitively concerted
expression of virulence genes reflects events during infection, El Tor
vibrios can be assumed to produce CT not continuously but in bursts.
The burst would occur at the point where bacterial multiplication and
nutrient consumption inside the gut have led to conditions equivalent
to those under an AKI growth. Production of CT with its fluid secretion
activity would flush bacteria out of the intestine; remaining vibrios
would reinitiate the growth cycle. Newly multiplied bacteria would be
flushed again when the same conditions are present. How this would be
advantageous for vibrios is not clear, but if initial CT synthesis
occurred at relatively low bacterial densities, as seen in vitro, total
amounts of CT inside the gut would also be relatively low by the time
bacteria were expelled. This may result in a less aggressive infection,
which in turn could help explain why El Tor vibrios cause a less severe
disease, with a higher proportion of asymptomatic cases, than classical
strains (12). A theoretical ecological advantage derived
from a less severe disease is that if El Tor-infected individuals are
less debilitated, they could more easily disseminate vibrios into the environment (6). A more efficient dissemination could
explain why the El Tor biotype has quickly established itself
throughout the world in the last decades. In the latter respect, it is
noteworthy that the more recent, rapidly spreading V. cholerae O139 shares many characteristics with V. cholerae El Tor, including a requirement for growth under AKI
conditions to produce CT (33).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank J. L. Puente and E. Morett for useful discussions,
Rosa Yu for assistance with primer extension experiments and comments on the manuscript, and Patricia Romero for help with immunoblots.
J.S. gratefully acknowledges a stipend by Sistema Nacional de
Investigadores (Mexico). A.I.M. was recipient of a scholarship for
Ph.D. studies (CONACYT, Mexico). This work was supported by grant
SPE-VACC-HN-01 (SAREC-SIDA, Sweden) (to J.S.) and Public Health Service
grant AI 31645 (to V.J.D.) from the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Facultad de
Medicina, UAEM, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Mor.
Mexico 62210. Phone: (52) 73 297009. Fax: (52) 73 297031 E-mail:
joaquin.sanchez{at}microbio.gu.se.
Editor:
J. T. Barbieri
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bassler, B. L.,
E. P. Greenberg, and A. M. Stevens.
1997.
Cross-species induction of luminescence in the quorum-sensing bacterium Vibrio harveyi.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4043-4045[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Brown, R. C., and R. K. Taylor.
1995.
Organization of tcp, acf, and toxT genes within a ToxT-dependent operon.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:425-439[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Carroll, P. A.,
K. T. Tashima,
M. B. Rogers,
V. J. DiRita, and S. B. Calderwood.
1997.
Phase variation in tcpH modulates expression of the ToxR regulon in Vibrio cholerae.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:1099-1111[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Carroll, P. A.,
K. Skorupski,
R. K. Taylor, and S. B. Calderwood.
1998.
Differences in transcription and activity of the tcpPH gene products explains differential regulations of the ToxR regulon between classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae, abstr. B-185, p. 86.
In
Abstracts of the 98th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1998. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 5.
|
Champion, G. A.,
M. N. Neely,
M. A. Brennan, and V. J. DiRita.
1997.
A branch in the ToxR regulatory cascade of Vibrio cholerae revealed by characterization of toxT mutant strains.
Mol. Microbiol.
23:323-331[Medline].
|
| 5a.
| Crawford, J. A., and V. J. DiRita.
Unpublished data.
|
| 6.
|
Ewald, P. W.
1991.
Waterborne transmission and the evolution of virulence among gastrointestinal bacteria.
Epidemiol. Infect.
106:83-119[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
DiRita, V. J.
1992.
Co-ordinate expression of virulence genes by ToxR in Vibrio cholerae.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:451-458[Medline].
|
| 7a.
| DiRita, V. J. Unpublished data.
|
| 8.
|
DiRita, V. J., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1991.
Periplasmic interaction between two membrane regulatory proteins, ToxR and ToxS, results in signal transduction and transcriptional activation.
Cell
64:29-37[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
DiRita, V. J.,
C. Parsot,
G. Jander, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1991.
Regulatory cascade controls virulence factors in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:5403-5407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
DiRita, V. J.,
M. Neely,
R. K. Taylor, and P. M. Bruss.
1996.
Differential expression of the ToxR regulon in classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae is due to biotype-specific control over toxT expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7991-7995[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Dubey, R. S.,
M. Lindblad, and J. Holmgren.
1990.
Purification of El Tor cholera enterotoxins and comparisons with classical toxin.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
136:1839-1847[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Glass, R. I.,
S. Becker,
I. M. Huq,
B. J. Stoll,
M. U. Khan,
M. H. Merson,
J. V. Lee, and R. E. Black.
1982.
Endemic cholera in rural Bangladesh, 1966-1980.
Am. J. Epidemiol.
116:959-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Häse, C. C., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1998.
TcpP protein is a positive regulator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:730-734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Higgins, D. E.,
E. Nazareno, and V. J. DiRita.
1992.
The virulence gene activator ToxT from Vibrio cholerae is a member of the AraC family of transcriptional activators.
J. Bacteriol.
174:6974-6980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Higgins, D. E., and V. J. DiRita.
1994.
Transcriptional control of toxT, a regulatory gene in the ToxR regulon of Vibrio cholerae.
Mol. Microbiol.
14:17-29[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Higgins, D. E., and V. J. DiRita.
1996.
Genetic analysis of the interaction between Vibrio cholerae transcription activator ToxR and toxT promoter DNA.
J. Bacteriol.
178:1080-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Iwanaga, M.,
K. Yamamoto,
N. Higa,
Y. Ichinose,
N. Nakasone, and M. Tanabe.
1986.
Culture conditions for stimulating cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor.
Microbiol. Immunol.
30:1075-1083[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Iwanaga, M., and T. Kuyyakanond.
1987.
Large production of cholera toxin by Vibrio cholerae O1 in yeast extract peptone water.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:2314-2316[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Jobling, M. G., and R. K. Holmes.
1997.
Characterization of hapR, a positive regulator of the Vibrio cholerae HA/protease gene hap, and its identification as a functional homologue of the Vibrio harveyi luxR gene.
Mol. Microbiol.
26:1023-1034[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Jonson, G.,
J. Holmgren, and A. M. Svennerholm.
1991.
Epitope differences in toxin-coregulated pili produced by classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae O1.
Microb. Pathog.
11:179-188[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Jonson, G.,
A. M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren.
1990.
Expression of virulence factors by classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae in vivo and in vitro.
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
74:221-228.
|
| 21a.
| KruKonis, E. S., and V. J. DiRita.
Unpublished data.
|
| 21b.
| Miller, A., V. J. DiRita, and J. Sanchez.
Unpublished data.
|
| 22.
|
Miller, V. L.,
R. K. Taylor, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1987.
Cholera toxin transcriptional activator ToxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein.
Cell
48:271-279[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Ogierman, M. A.,
E. Voss,
C. Meaney,
R. Faast,
S. R. Attridge, and P. A. Manning.
1996.
Comparison of the promoter proximal regions of the toxin-co-regulated tcp gene cluster in classical and El Tor strains of Vibrio cholerae O1.
Gene
170:9-16[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Otteman, K. M., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1996.
The ToxR protein of Vibrio cholerae forms homodimers and heterodimers.
J. Bacteriol.
178:156-162[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Pearson, G. D.,
V. J. DiRita,
M. B. Goldberg,
S. A. Boyko,
S. B. Calderwood, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1990.
New attenuated derivatives of Vibrio cholerae.
Res. Microbiol.
141:893-899[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Peterson, K. M., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1988.
Characterization of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon: identification of novel genes involved in intestinal colonization.
Infect. Immun.
56:2822-2829[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Sanchez, J., and J. Holmgren.
1989.
Recombinant system for overexpression of cholera toxin B subunit in Vibrio cholerae as a basis for vaccine development.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:481-485[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Skorupski, K., and R. K. Taylor.
1997.
Cyclic AMP and its receptor protein negatively regulate the coordinate expression of cholera toxin and toxin co-regulated pilus in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:265-270[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Skorupski, K., and R. K. Taylor.
1997.
Control of the ToxR virulence regulon in Vibrio cholerae by environmental stimuli.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:1003-1009[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Svennerholm, A. M., and J. Holmgren.
1978.
Identification of Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin by means of a ganglioside immunosorbent assay (GM1-ELISA) procedure.
Curr. Microbiol.
1:19-23.
|
| 31.
|
Svennerholm, A. M.,
M. Wikström,
L. Lindholm, and J. Holmgren.
1986.
Monoclonal antibodies and immunodetection methods for Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli, p. 77-95.
In
A. J. Macario, et al. (ed.), Monoclonal antibodies against bacteria, vol. III. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Taylor, R. K.,
V. L. Miller,
D. B. Furlong, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1987.
Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:2833-2837[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Thomas, S.,
S. G. Williams, and P. A. Manning.
1995.
Regulation of tcp genes in classical and El Tor strains of Vibrio cholerae O1.
Gene.
166:43-48[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Waldor, M. K., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1994.
ToxR regulates virulence gene expression in non-O1 strains of Vibrio cholerae that cause epidemic cholera.
Infect. Immun.
62:72-78[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Waldor, M. K., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1996.
Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin.
Science
272:1910-1914[Abstract].
|
| 36.
| Yu, R. R., and V. J. DiRita. Analysis of
an autoregulatory loop controlling ToxT, cholera toxin, and
toxin-coregulated pilus production in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol., in press.
|
Infection and Immunity, May 1999, p. 2178-2183, Vol. 67, No. 5
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Abuaita, B. H., Withey, J. H.
(2009). Bicarbonate Induces Vibrio cholerae Virulence Gene Expression by Enhancing ToxT Activity. Infect. Immun.
77: 4111-4120
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Silva, A. J., Leitch, G. J., Camilli, A., Benitez, J. A.
(2006). Contribution of Hemagglutinin/Protease and Motility to the Pathogenesis of El Tor Biotype Cholera. Infect. Immun.
74: 2072-2079
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanchez, J., Medina, G., Buhse, T., Holmgren, J., Soberon-Chavez, G.
(2004). Expression of Cholera Toxin under Non-AKI Conditions in Vibrio cholerae El Tor Induced by Increasing the Exposed Surface of Cultures. J. Bacteriol.
186: 1355-1361
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Haralalka, S., Nandi, S., Bhadra, R. K.
(2003). Mutation in the relA Gene of Vibrio cholerae Affects In Vitro and In Vivo Expression of Virulence Factors. J. Bacteriol.
185: 4672-4682
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nesper, J., Schild, S., Lauriano, C. M., Kraiss, A., Klose, K. E., Reidl, J.
(2002). Role of Vibrio cholerae O139 Surface Polysaccharides in Intestinal Colonization. Infect. Immun.
70: 5990-5996
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sarkar, A., Nandy, R. K., Nair, G. B., Ghose, A. C.
(2002). Vibrio Pathogenicity Island and Cholera Toxin Genetic Element-Associated Virulence Genes and Their Expression in Non-O1 Non-O139 Strains of Vibrio cholerae. Infect. Immun.
70: 4735-4742
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tischler, A. D., Lee, S. H., Camilli, A.
(2002). The Vibrio cholerae vieSAB Locus Encodes a Pathway Contributing to Cholera Toxin Production. J. Bacteriol.
184: 4104-4113
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, S. H., Butler, S. M., Camilli, A.
(2001). Selection for in vivo regulators of bacterial virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 6889-6894
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nesper, J., Lauriano, C. M., Klose, K. E., Kapfhammer, D., Krai{beta}, A., Reidl, J.
(2001). Characterization of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor galU and galE Mutants: Influence on Lipopolysaccharide Structure, Colonization, and Biofilm Formation. Infect. Immun.
69: 435-445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Provenzano, D., Klose, K. E.
(2000). Altered expression of the ToxR-regulated porins OmpU and OmpT diminishes Vibrio cholerae bile resistance, virulence factor expression, and intestinal colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.170219997v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Murley, Y. M., Behari, J., Griffin, R., Calderwood, S. B.
(2000). Classical and El Tor Biotypes of Vibrio cholerae Differ in Timing of Transcription of tcpPH during Growth in Inducing Conditions. Infect. Immun.
68: 3010-3014
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Provenzano, D., Klose, K. E.
(2000). Altered expression of the ToxR-regulated porins OmpU and OmpT diminishes Vibrio cholerae bile resistance, virulence factor expression, and intestinal colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 10220-10224
[Abstract]
[Full Text]