Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, June 1999, p. 2964-2968, Vol. 67, No. 6
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Structures in Bacillus subtilis Are
Recognized by CD14 in a Lipopolysaccharide Binding
Protein-Dependent Reaction
Xiaolong
Fan,1,
Felix
Stelter,1,*
Rene
Menzel,1
Robert
Jack,1
Ingo
Spreitzer,2
Thomas
Hartung,2 and
Christine
Schütt1
Institute of Immunology and Transfusion
Medicine, D-17489 Greifswald,1 and
Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Konstanz,
78434 Konstanz,2 Germany
Received 15 October 1998/Returned for modification 23 November
1998/Accepted 24 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The CD14 molecule expressed on monocytes and macrophages is a
high-affinity receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and hence
an important component of the innate immune system. LPS binding protein
(LBP) is required to facilitate the binding of LPS to CD14 in vitro and
is necessary for the induction of an inflammatory response to LPS in
vivo. Here we show that CD14 and LBP can also bind to lipoteichoic acid
from the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Although CD14 does not interact with intact B. subtilis
organisms, a brief exposure of the bacteria to serum converts them into
a form which can bind to CD14 in an LBP-dependent reaction. When
serum-pretreated B. subtilis organisms are incubated with
the myelomonocytic cell line U937, which expresses CD14, the bacteria
are rapidly phagocytosed. The phagocytosis is strictly dependent both
on LBP and on CD14. These in vitro results suggest that LBP plays a
role in the innate response not only to gram-negative but also to
gram-positive infections.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Receptors of the innate immune
system have been selected for their ability to recognize molecules
which are present on microorganisms but not on cells of the host
(8). These target molecules are typically broadly
distributed among major groups of microorganisms and are required for
their survival. One well-characterized example of such a target
molecule is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the principal endotoxin of
gram-negative bacteria (13). The CD14 molecule expressed on
monocytes and macrophages serves as a high-affinity receptor for LPS
(19), and the binding of LPS results in cellular activation
and the induction of an inflammatory response. However, the interaction
of LPS with CD14 is slow unless it is catalyzed by the serum protein
LPS binding protein (LBP) (14), which is therefore essential
for the cellular response to LPS in vivo (6). Monocytes
expressing CD14 are able to bind not only free LPS but also intact
gram-negative bacteria, and this binding, which likewise requires
catalysis by LBP (7), is followed by phagocytosis (4). These interactions involving LBP and CD14 are believed to be pivotal to the innate response to a gram-negative bacterial infection. Recent in vitro experiments have shown that CD14 can bind
not only LPS but also components of the gram-positive bacterial cell
wall (5, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17, 18). Of particular interest is
the observation that CD14 can bind fragments of gram-positive cell
walls generated by boiling the bacteria in sodium dodecyl sulfate
solution, followed by mechanical disruption and acetone extraction
(12). Nevertheless, in these experiments it is unclear whether the cell wall components recognized by CD14 are likely to be
exposed on the bacterial surface in vivo. The role of LBP in innate
recognition of gram-positive bacteria has not yet been established.
Here we show that both LBP and CD14 can bind to lipoteichoic acid (LTA)
derived from the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
In addition, whole bacteria are recognized by CD14 in an LBP-dependent
reaction but only after preincubation with serum. Electron microscopy
suggests that the serum pretreatment results in the opening up of the
bacterial cell wall. When myelomonocytic cells expressing CD14 bind
serum-pretreated bacteria, the bacteria may be phagocytosed. The
CD14-LBP system may thus play a role in countering gram-positive
bacterial infections.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents.
Anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody (MAb) My4
(immunoglobulin G2b) was purchased from Coulter Electronics (Krefeld,
Germany). Anti-CD14 MAb biG 14 (immunoglobulin G2a) was obtained from
Biometec GmbH (Greifswald, Germany), and Fab fragments were prepared
from it as previously described (4). Isotypically identical
control antibodies (anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) were from Becton
Dickinson (Heidelburg, Germany). Histidine-tagged recombinant murine
LBP and recombinant human soluble CD14 were purified from supernatants of transfected CHO cells as previously described (4, 11). Normal mouse serum (NMS) and LPS from Salmonella minnesota
Re 595 were purchased from Sigma (Munich, Germany). For the experiment shown in Fig. 2B mouse serum and plasma were obtained from BALB/c mice.
Plasma was prepared from blood anticoagulated with 0.011 M sodium
citrate. For all experiments serum and plasma were heat inactivated at
56°C for 1 h. LTA derived from B. subtilis was purchased from Sigma. The purity of the commercially available LTA has
not been established. We therefore prepared LTA from B. subtilis DSMZ 1087 according to a method of Fischer et al.
(2, 3). Briefly, a hot-phenol-water extraction of disrupted
bacteria was followed by dialysis of the aqueous phase and subsequent
hydrophobic interaction chromatography (fast protein liquid
chromatography with octyl-Sepharose CL-4B; Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden).
Glass materials, tubing, and the column material were rendered pyrogen free with 0.1 M NaOH and washed with pyrogen-free water. The phosphorus contents of the different fractions were determined by a
phosphomolybdene blue assay. LTA is eluted in the late fractions which
contain the highest amount of phosphate. The LTA was lyophylized until use in the respective experiments. This LTA preparation was negative in
the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay, i.e., it was
contaminated with less than 100 pg of LPS per mg of LTA. The
LTA-containing fractions were capable of inducing release of tumor
necrosis factor alpha in human whole blood. When the LTA preparation
was subjected to an additional anion-exchange chromatography experiment
(fast protein liquid chromatography with DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow;
Pharmacia), the material eluted as a single symmetric peak. LTA and
cytokine-inducing activity still coeluted, indicating that LTA
represented the cytokine-inducing activity.
Bacteria.
B. subtilis 168 was grown in Luria-Bertani
broth at 37°C to mid-log phase, and cells were collected by
centrifugation. The number of bacteria present was determined by
plating serial dilutions. Bacteria were heat inactivated by treatment
at 60°C for 1 h, washed twice in sterile phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) and
resuspended in PBS to achieve an optical density a 550 nm of 2.0.
FITC labeling of B. subtilis and analysis of
bacterial binding to CHO cells expressing human CD14.
Heat-inactivated B. subtilis organisms (2.3 × 109) in 10 ml of PBS were labeled with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC) by incubation with
5(6)-carboxyfluorescein-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Fluos; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). A solution containing 0.9 ml of 2-mg/ml
Fluos in dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the bacteria, and the mixture
was shaken in the dark for 2 h. After labeling, the bacteria were
pelleted at 5,000 × g for 6 min, washed twice with
PBS, and resuspended in 10 ml of PBS. The FITC-labeled bacteria were
stored at 4°C and used within 2 weeks. With the exception of the
experiments shown in Fig. 1 and 2B, the labeled bacteria were
pretreated by incubation in PBS containing 10% NMS at 37°C for
2 h. Serum-pretreated bacteria were washed twice and taken up in
the original volume of PBS.
The binding of FITC-labeled bacteria to CHO cells expressing the human
CD14 gene was carried out as previously described (7). Cells
were briefly trypsinized, collected by centrifugation, washed twice in
PBS, and resuspended in ice-cold PBS containing 0.1% sodium azide and
1% bovine serum albumin. Cells at a final concentration of
106/ml were incubated with FITC-labeled B. subtilis at 4°C for 20 min at a cell-to-bacterium ratio of 1:20.
In some experiments a 10-fold excess of unlabeled bacteria was added to
the binding reaction mixture as a competitor. After cells were washed
twice, fluorescence intensities were measured in a FACScan.
Gel shift assay.
Binding of LTA to CD14 and LBP was assayed
by a gel shift method (18). Briefly, the amounts of soluble
CD14 or LBP indicated in Fig. 4 were mixed with different amounts of
LTA and incubated overnight at 37°C in a final volume of 10 µl of
PBS. Mixtures were loaded onto Tris-glycine gels (pH 8.8; Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Munich, Germany) and separated by native polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis. CD14 and LBP were detected by Western blotting
with a rabbit anti-human CD14 antiserum (1) or a rabbit
anti-mouse LBP antiserum (Biometec GmbH).
Scanning electron microscopy.
Bacteria were fixed with
glutaraldehyde and applied to poly-L-lysine-coated glass
plates. After treatment with osmium tetroxide, the samples were
processed through critical-point drying and then examined in a Zeiss
DSM 904A scanning electron microscope.
Analysis of phagocytosis of FITC-labeled B. subtilis
by U937 cells.
CD14 expression was induced on U937 cells with
vitamin D3 as previously described (7). Cells
were collected, washed three times with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended
in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Induced or noninduced U937
cells (1.5 × 105) were incubated at 37°C in a
shaking water bath with 20 µl of serum-pretreated FITC-labeled
B. subtilis organisms (cell-to-bacterium ratio, 1:50) in the
presence or absence of 5 µg of LBP per ml in a final volume of 100 µl. After 10 min, 100 µl of Phagotest trypan blue quenching
solution (Orpegen Pharma, Heidelberg, Germany) was added. The cells
were washed twice with 3 ml of ice-cold PBS containing 0.1%
NaN3 and analyzed in a FACScan.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
LBP mediates binding of serum-pretreated B. subtilis to
membrane-bound CD14.
FITC-labeled B. subtilis organisms
do not detectably bind to CHO cells expressing human CD14 in the
absence of LBP. In the presence of LBP there is marginal binding which
appears to be dependent on CD14 since it can be inhibited by the
anti-CD14 MAb My4 but not by the isotype-matched control antibody (Fig.
1). However, when the labeled B. subtilis cells were first pretreated with 10% NMS at 37°C for
2 h, significant binding was seen in the presence but not in the
absence of LBP (Fig. 2A). This binding is
not an artifact induced by the labeling procedure since it can be
inhibited by a 20-fold excess of unlabeled serum-pretreated bacteria.
The interaction is CD14 dependent since it is specifically blocked
by the anti CD14 MAb My4 and by an excess of LPS. The binding of
B. subtilis is potentiated in a similar way by preincubation with plasma (Fig. 2B). This fact demonstrates that the potentiation is
not dependent on the presence of activated components of the clotting
cascade. Finally, CHO cells expressing a mutant CD14, CD14(39-41,
43-44A), which is incapable of recognizing LPS and
Escherichia coli (16), fail to bind the
serum-pretreated bacteria (Fig. 2C). These results show that both CD14
and LBP are directly involved in the binding of serum-pretreated
B. subtilis and that the LPS binding site on CD14 is
required for the interaction.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Binding of FITC-labeled B. subtilis to human
CD14 expressed on CHO cells. Cells were incubated with labeled bacteria
in the presence or absence of 1 µg of recombinant LBP per ml. The
marginal binding in the presence of LBP is abolished by inclusion of 10 µg of anti CD14 MAb My4 per ml in the incubation mixture but not by
the same amount of an isotype-matched control. The ratio of cells to
bacteria was 1:20.
|
|



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) Binding of serum-pretreated FITC-labeled B. subtilis to human CD14 expressed on CHO cells. Cells were
incubated with labeled bacteria in the presence or absence of 1 µg of
recombinant LBP per ml. Binding in the presence of LBP is abolished by
inclusion of (i) a 20-fold excess of serum-pretreated unlabeled
B. subtilis cells, (ii) Salmonella minnesota Re
595 LPS at a final concentration of 20 µg/ml, or (iii) 10 µg of
anti CD14 MAb My4 per ml (but not by the same amount of an
isotype-matched control). The ratio of cells to bacteria was 1:20. (B)
Binding of plasma-pretreated FITC-labeled B. subtilis to
human CD14 expressed on CHO cells. B. subtilis organisms
were not pretreated (upper), pretreated with serum (middle), or
pretreated with plasma (lower). Binding to CHO cells expressing human
CD14 was determined in the presence of 1 µg of recombinant LBP per
ml. (C) B. subtilis does not bind to the mutant
CD14(39-41, 43-44A), which lacks the binding sites for
LPS and E. coli.
|
|
Serum treatment opens up the structure of the bacterial cell
wall.
The experiments shown in Fig. 1 and 2 demonstrate that
heat-treated FITC-labeled B. subtilis organisms are not
effectively bound to CD14 unless the bacterial preparation is first
incubated in serum. We therefore asked whether the serum pretreatment
has any demonstrable effect on the gross morphology of the bacteria. As
shown in the scanning electron micrographs in Fig.
3A, fresh log-phase B. subtilis organisms have a smooth surface which takes on a somewhat
roughened appearance after heat treatment (Fig. 3B). However,
incubation in 10% NMS (Fig. 3C) results in considerable damage and the
breaking up of almost all bacteria. We are currently trying to identify
the serum factor(s) involved in this process. Thus, serum treatment of
the bacteria makes available structures which are essential for the
LBP-mediated interaction with CD14. The low degree of binding to CD14
which is seen prior to serum treatment (Fig. 1) may be due to the
presence of a small fraction of bacteria which was disrupted during
heat inactivation.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Serum treatment of B. subtilis opens up the
bacterial cell wall. Mid-log-phase cells were examined by transmission
electron microscopy either directly (A), after heat inactivation (B),
or after heat inactivation and exposure to 10% NMS for 2 h at
37°C (C).
|
|
Both LBP and CD14 bind in vitro to LTA derived from the cell wall
of B. subtilis.
Because LTA is a major constituent of the
outer cell wall of gram-positive organisms, we have used a gel shift
assay to test whether LBP and CD14 are able to interact with it. As
shown in Fig. 4, both proteins are
shifted after incubation with LTA, indicating the formation of stable
CD14-LTA (Fig. 4A) and LBP-LTA (Fig. 4C) complexes. Again, the
formation of CD14-LTA complexes depends on the presence of an intact
LPS binding site, since the soluble form of CD14(39-41,
43-44A) is incapable of binding to LTA (Fig. 4B). Since the LTA
content of the Sigma preparation is unclear, we repeated the binding to
wild-type CD14 using a second highly purified sample of LTA (Fig. 4D).
The results of this similar gel shift demonstrated that binding is
indeed to LTA rather than to some contaminant in the Sigma preparation.


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
LTA derived from the cell wall of B. subtilis
forms complexes with CD14 (A) and LBP (C) but not with
CD14(39-41, 43-44A) (B). Soluble CD14 and LBP were
incubated overnight with LTA in the amounts indicated and separated by
native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. CD14 and LBP were detected
by Western blotting. CD14 binding at limiting ligand concentrations
results in complexes which migrate faster than the native protein,
while CD14 binding at excess ligand concentrations results in complexes
that migrate more slowly. (D) The binding to CD14 was repeated with a
second highly purified preparation of LTA. s, soluble.
|
|
These results point to LTA being a putative ligand for recognition both
by LBP and by CD14. These proteins may act as pattern
recognition
elements (
8) by detecting a three-dimensional similarity
between part of the LPS molecule on gram-negative bacteria and
the LTA
molecule on gram-positive
bacteria.
CD14- and LBP-dependent phagocytosis of serum-pretreated B. subtilis by the myelomonocytic cell line U937.
To determine
whether the binding of the bacteria to CD14 might have physiologically
relevant consequences, we looked for phagocytosis of B. subtilis by myeloid cells. We have previously established a flow
cytometric assay to show that vitamin D3-induced U937 cells bind and internalize gram-negative bacteria in a CD14- and
LBP-dependent fashion (4). In this assay a quenching reagent
abolishes the fluorescence signal from labeled bacteria bound to the
outside of the cell. A signal can be obtained only from those labeled bacteria which have been protected from the quenching agent by internalization. We have used this assay to study the fate of serum-pretreated B. subtilis cells after they bound to the
CD14 receptor. As shown in Fig. 5,
vitamin D3-induced U937 cells can internalize
serum-pretreated B. subtilis and this requires the presence
of both LBP and CD14. This phagocytosis process is dependent on CD14,
since it can be effectively blocked by Fab fragments of the anti CD14
MAb biG 14.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Serum-pretreated B. subtilis organisms are
phagocytosed by vitamin D3-induced U937 cells in a CD14-
and LBP-dependent fashion. (A) Phagocytosis was performed at 37 or
4°C in the presence or absence of 2.5 µg of murine recombinant LBP
per ml. Internalization of the labeled bacteria is inhibitable with Fab
fragments of the anti-CD14 MAb biG 14 or with a 20-fold excess of
unlabeled bacteria (added where indicated). The ratio of cells to
labeled bacteria was 1:50. (B) The same experiment as described for
panel A was carried out with uninduced U937 cells, which do not express
CD14.
|
|
These results demonstrate that serum pretreatment of this gram-positive
bacterium facilitates an LBP-mediated interaction
between some
component of the bacterial cell wall and the pattern
recognition
element CD14 on the surface of a phagocyte, leading
to phagocytosis. We
further show that LTA

a major component of
the gram-positive bacterial
wall

is able to bind to CD14 in an
LBP-dependent fashion. Further work
will be necessary to determine
whether an LTA-CD14 interaction is
actually involved in the binding
of serum-pretreated
B. subtilis to CD14 and, if so, whether this
interaction alone is
sufficient to trigger phagocytosis or cellular
activation. Recent
reports (
17,
18) indicate that CD14 can
also interact with
the peptidoglycan component of the gram-positive
cell wall. It is
therefore very possible that CD14 as a pattern
recognition receptor
utilizes more than one target molecule on
the bacterium. Whatever the
precise nature of the ligands, these
interactions may be significant in
the destruction and removal
of invading gram-positive bacteria in
vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank E. Friebe and R. Görlich for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through
grants SFB217 and DFG IIB6Ste 587/2-2.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Institute for Immunology and
Transfusion Medicine, Klinikum, Sauerbruchstraße, D-17487 Greifswald,
Germany. Phone: 49-3834-865455. Fax: 49-3834-865490. E-mail:
stelter{at}uni-greifswald.de.
Present address: Department of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy,
Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Editor:
J. R. McGhee
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bufler, P.,
G. Stiegler,
M. Schuchmann,
S. Hess,
C. Krüger,
F. Stelter,
C. Schütt,
C. Eckershorn, and H. Engelmann.
1995.
Soluble LPS receptor (CD14) is released via two different mechanisms from human monocytes and CD14 transfectants.
Eur. J. Immunol.
25:604-610[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Fischer, W.
1993.
Molecular analysis of lipid macroamphiphiles by hydrophobic interaction chromatography, exemplified with lipoteichoic acids.
Anal. Biochem.
208:49-56[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Fischer, W.,
H. U. Koch, and R. Haas.
1983.
Improved preparation of lipoteichoic acids.
Eur. J. Biochem.
133:523-530[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Grunwald, U.,
X. Fan,
R. S. Jack,
G. Workalemahu,
A. Kallies,
F. Stelter, and C. S. Schütt.
1996.
Monocytes can phagocytose Gram-negative bacteria by a CD14 dependent mechanism.
J. Immunol.
157:4119-4125[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Gupta, D.,
T. N. Kirkland,
S. Viriyakosol, and R. Dziarski.
1996.
CD14 is a cell-activating receptor for bacterial peptidoglycan.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:23310-23316[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Jack, R. S.,
X. Fan,
M. Bernheiden,
G. Rune,
M. Ehlers,
A. Weber,
G. Kirsch,
R. Mentel,
B. Fürll,
M. Freudenberg,
G. Schmitz,
F. Stelter, and C. Schütt.
1997.
Lipopolysaccharide binding protein is required to combat a murine Gram-negative infection.
Nature.
389:742-745[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Jack, R. S.,
U. Grunwald,
F. Stelter,
G. Workalemahu, and C. Schütt.
1995.
Both membrane bound and soluble forms of CD14 bind to Gram-negative bacteria.
Eur. J. Immunol.
25:1436-1441[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Janeway, C. A.
1992.
The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self.
Immunol. Today
13:11-16[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kusunoki, T.,
E. Hailman,
S. C. J. Todd,
H. S. Lichenstein, and S. D. Wright.
1995.
Molecules from Staphylococcus aureus that bind CD14 and stimulate innate immune responses.
J. Exp. Med.
182:1673-1682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Kusunoki, T., and S. D. Wright.
1996.
Chemical characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus molecules that have CD14-dependent cell-stimulating activity.
J. Immunol.
157:5112-5117[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Neumeister, B.,
M. Faigle,
M. Sommer,
U. Zähringer,
F. Stelter,
R. Menzel,
C. Schütt, and H. Northoff.
1998.
Low endotoxic potential of Legionella pneumophila lipopolysaccharide due to failure of interaction with the monocyte lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14.
Infect. Immun.
66:4151-4157[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Pugin, J.,
D. Heumann,
A. Tomasz,
V. V. Kravchenko,
Y. Akamatsu,
M. Nishijima,
M. P. Glauser,
P. S. Tobias, and R. J. Ulevitch.
1994.
CD14 is a pattern recognition receptor.
Immunity
1:509-516[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Rietschel, E. T.,
T. Kirikae,
F. U. Schade,
U. Mamat,
G. Schmidt,
H. Loppnow,
A. J. Ulmer,
U. Zähringer,
U. Seydel,
F. D. Padova,
M. Schreier, and H. Brade.
1994.
Bacterial endotoxin: molecular relationships of structure to activity and function.
FASEB J.
8:217-225[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Schumann, R. R.,
S. R. Leong,
G. W. Flaggs,
P. W. Gray,
S. D. Wright,
J. C. Mathison,
P. S. Tobias, and R. J. Ulevitch.
1990.
Structure and function of lipopolysaccharide binding protein.
Science
249:1429-1431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Soell, M.,
E. Lett,
F. Holveck,
M. Schöller,
D. Wachsmann, and J. P. Klein.
1995.
Activation of human monocytes by streptococcal rhamnose glucose polymers is mediated by CD14 antigen, and mannan binding protein inhibits TNF- release.
J. Immunol.
154:851-860[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Stelter, F.,
M. Bernheiden,
R. Menzel,
R. S. Jack,
S. Witt,
X. Fan,
M. Pfister, and C. Schütt.
1997.
Mutation of amino acids 39-44 of human CD14 abrogates binding of lipopolysaccharide and Escherichia coli.
Eur. J. Biochem.
243:100-109[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Weidemann, B.,
H. Brade,
E. T. Rietschel,
R. Dziarski,
V. Bazil,
S. Kusumoto,
H. D. Flad, and A. J. Ulmer.
1994.
Soluble peptidoglycan-induced monokine production can be blocked by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies and by lipid A partial structures.
Infect. Immun.
62:4709-4715[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Weidemann, B.,
J. Schletter,
R. Dziarski,
S. Kusumoto,
F. Stelter,
E. T. Rietschel,
H. D. Flad, and A. J. Ulmer.
1997.
Specific binding of soluble peptidoglycan and muramyldipeptide to CD14 on human monocytes.
Infect. Immun.
65:858-864[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Wright, S. D.,
R. A. Ramos,
P. S. Tobias,
R. J. Ulevitch, and J. C. Mathison.
1990.
CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein.
Science
249:1431-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, June 1999, p. 2964-2968, Vol. 67, No. 6
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Oliva, C., Turnbough, C. L. Jr., Kearney, J. F.
(2009). CD14-Mac-1 interactions in Bacillus anthracis spore internalization by macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 13957-13962
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zeng, R., Bequette, B. J., Vinyard, B. T., Bannerman, D. D.
(2009). Determination of milk and blood concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in cows with naturally acquired subclinical and clinical mastitis. J DAIRY SCI
92: 980-989
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Knapp, S., von Aulock, S., Leendertse, M., Haslinger, I., Draing, C., Golenbock, D. T., van der Poll, T.
(2008). Lipoteichoic Acid-Induced Lung Inflammation Depends on TLR2 and the Concerted Action of TLR4 and the Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor. J. Immunol.
180: 3478-3484
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hermann, C.
(2007). Review: Variability of host pathogen interaction. Innate Immunity
13: 199-218
[Abstract]
-
Spiller, S., Dreher, S., Meng, G., Grabiec, A., Thomas, W., Hartung, T., Pfeffer, K., Hochrein, H., Brade, H., Bessler, W., Wagner, H., Kirschning, C. J.
(2007). Cellular Recognition of Trimyristoylated Peptide or Enterobacterial Lipopolysaccharide via Both TLR2 and TLR4. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 13190-13198
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schroder, N. W.J., Schumann, R. R.
(2005). Non-LPS targets and actions of LPS binding protein (LBP). Innate Immunity
11: 237-242
[Abstract]
-
Branger, J., Florquin, S., Knapp, S., Leemans, J. C., Pater, J. M., Speelman, P., Golenbock, D. T., van der Poll, T.
(2004). LPS-binding protein-deficient mice have an impaired defense against Gram-negative but not Gram-positive pneumonia. Int Immunol
16: 1605-1611
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Neuhaus, F. C., Baddiley, J.
(2003). A Continuum of Anionic Charge: Structures and Functions of D-Alanyl-Teichoic Acids in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
67: 686-723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peters, K., Unger, R. E., Brunner, J., Kirkpatrick, C.J.
(2003). Molecular basis of endothelial dysfunction in sepsis. Cardiovasc Res
60: 49-57
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Muroi, M., Ohnishi, T., Azumi-Mayuzumi, S., Tanamoto, K.-i.
(2003). Lipopolysaccharide-Mimetic Activities of a Toll-Like Receptor 2-Stimulatory Substance(s) in Enterobacterial Lipopolysaccharide Preparations. Infect. Immun.
71: 3221-3226
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schroder, N. W. J., Morath, S., Alexander, C., Hamann, L., Hartung, T., Zahringer, U., Gobel, U. B., Weber, J. R., Schumann, R. R.
(2003). Lipoteichoic Acid (LTA) of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus Activates Immune Cells via Toll-like Receptor (TLR)-2, Lipopolysaccharide-binding Protein (LBP), and CD14, whereas TLR-4 and MD-2 Are Not Involved. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 15587-15594
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vreugdenhil, A. C. E., Rousseau, C. H., Hartung, T., Greve, J. W. M., van 't Veer, C., Buurman, W. A.
(2003). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Binding Protein Mediates LPS Detoxification by Chylomicrons. J. Immunol.
170: 1399-1405
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morath, S., Geyer, A., Spreitzer, I., Hermann, C., Hartung, T.
(2002). Structural Decomposition and Heterogeneity of Commercial Lipoteichoic Acid Preparations. Infect. Immun.
70: 938-944
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Diterich, I., Harter, L., Hassler, D., Wendel, A., Hartung, T.
(2001). Modulation of Cytokine Release in Ex Vivo-Stimulated Blood from Borreliosis Patients. Infect. Immun.
69: 687-694
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schroder, N. W. J., Opitz, B., Lamping, N., Michelsen, K. S., Zahringer, U., Gobel, U. B., Schumann, R. R.
(2000). Involvement of Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein, CD14, and Toll-Like Receptors in the Initiation of Innate Immune Responses by Treponema Glycolipids. J. Immunol.
165: 2683-2693
[Abstract]
[Full Text]