Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, August 1999, p. 3733-3739, Vol. 67, No. 8
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Vibrio cholerae Intestinal Population
Dynamics in the Suckling Mouse Model of Infection
Michael J.
Angelichio,1
Jonathon
Spector,2
Matthew K.
Waldor,2,* and
Andrew
Camilli1,*
Department of Molecular Biology and
Microbiology, Tufts University School of
Medicine,1 and Division of Geographic
Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts-New England Medical
Center,2 Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Received 19 January 1999/Returned for modification 29 March
1999/Accepted 27 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The suckling mouse has been used as a model to identify
Vibrio cholerae intestinal colonization factors for over
two decades, yet little is known about the location of recoverable
organisms along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract following intragastric
inoculation. In the present study, we determined the population
dynamics of wild-type and avirulent mutant derivatives of both
classical and El Tor biotype strains throughout the entire suckling
mouse GI tract at various times after intragastric inoculation.
Wild-type strains preferentially colonized the middle small bowel with
a sharp demarcation between more proximal segments which had
manyfold-fewer recoverable cells. Surprisingly, large and stable
populations of viable cells were also recovered from the cecum and
large bowel. Strains lacking toxin-coregulated pili (TCP
)
were cleared from the small bowel; however, an El Tor TCP
strain colonized the cecum and large bowel almost as well as the
wild-type strain. Strains lacking lipopolysaccharide O antigen (OA
) were efficiently cleared from the small bowel at
early times but then showed net growth for the remainder of the
infections. Moreover, large populations of the OA
strains
were maintained in the large bowel. These results show that for the El
Tor biotype neither TCP nor OA is required for colonization of the
suckling mouse large bowel. Finally, similar percent recoveries of
wild-type, TCP
, and OA
strains from the
small bowel at an early time after infection suggest that TCP and OA
are not required for strains of either biotype to resist bactericidal
mechanisms in the suckling mouse GI tract.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The curved, highly motile
gram-negative rod Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of
the severe and sometimes lethal diarrheal disease cholera. Human biopsy
studies (17) as well as animal models (15, 16)
indicate that V. cholerae is a noninvasive pathogen. During
intestinal colonization, V. cholerae secretes cholera toxin,
an A-B subunit type toxin which catalyzes the transfer of an ADP-ribose
from NAD to a GTP-binding regulatory component of adenylate cyclase in
enterocytes (18). The signs and symptoms of cholera can
largely be reproduced by the administration of cholera toxin to human
volunteers (25), suggesting that the activity of this
enterotoxin primarily accounts for the clinical manifestations of
V. cholerae infection. The bacterial properties which
facilitate this organism's capacity to survive and multiply in the
small intestine, the principal locus of V. cholerae
intestinal colonization, are incompletely understood.
A variety of animal models (31) and bacterial genetic
screens have been used to study V. cholerae intestinal
colonization factors. The most commonly used animal model is the
suckling mouse. Unlike V. cholerae isolates in adult mice,
isolates orally administered to 3- to 5-day-old mice colonize the
intestine and cause fluid accumulation. Adult animals can be
experimentally infected by V. cholerae either through the
use of antibiotics to clear most of the normal flora prior to infection
or through the use of surgical ties on the small bowel (e.g., the adult
rabbit RITARD model) (30). Taylor et al. demonstrated that
toxin-coregulated pili (TCP), a type 4 pilus whose expression is
coregulated with cholera toxin, are required for colonization of the
suckling mouse small bowel (33). Subsequent studies in human
volunteers have established the requirement for TCP for V. cholerae human intestinal colonization (21). Although
there may be substantive differences between the gastrointestinal (GI)
tract of a suckling mouse and that of an adult human, the
above-described finding lends validity to the use of the suckling mouse
as a model for the study of V. cholerae intestinal colonization.
The suckling mouse model has been used to identify several other
V. cholerae colonization factors. Prior to the recombinant DNA era, Baselski and colleagues determined that spontaneous
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) rough V. cholerae strains are
severely defective in colonization of the suckling mouse small
intestine (4, 6). More recently, V. cholerae
strains harboring mutations in wbf genes encoding the
V. cholerae O1 O antigen (OA) (10, 23, 34) have
been constructed and found to be severely defective in intestinal
colonization, although the mechanism explaining this finding is
unknown. Other V. cholerae gene products which have been
shown to be important for colonization of the infant mouse include
accessory colonization factors (13, 22, 29), a
cell-associated mannose-fucose-resistant hemagglutinin (14),
and metabolic factors, such as iron (20) and magnesium
(10) transport proteins and arginine, purine, and biotin
biosynthesis enzymes (6, 8, 10).
More than 20 years ago, Baselski and Parker studied the distribution of
V. cholerae after oral infection of infant mice by using a
radioactive tracer (5). They found that the capacity of
different strains to colonize the infant mouse upper bowel differed
significantly among strains and that the capacity to colonize the upper
bowel is essential for the establishment of an infection. Although the
suckling mouse model is currently commonly used to study V. cholerae pathogenesis, there has not been much attention paid to
further characterization of the suckling mouse V. cholerae
colonization model since the pioneering studies of Baselski and Parker.
For example, the location of cells within different segments of the
small bowel has not been addressed, nor has the intestinal distribution
of El Tor biotype V. cholerae strains, the principal cause
of cholera in the world at present, been studied. In this study, we
have investigated the details of the population dynamics of a wild-type
El Tor strain and a classical V. cholerae strain along the
entire GI tract at multiple time points during the course of suckling
mouse infection. In addition, the population dynamics of
tcpA and wbf mutants of the El Tor and classical
strains along the entire GI tract were determined.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
The strains used in this study are listed
in Table 1. The N16961 strain was a
spontaneous streptomycin-resistant (Smr) mutant derived
from the clinical isolate N16961 from Bangladesh (24).
Competition experiments showed that the Smr N16961 strain
was as fit for growth in vitro and as virulent in the suckling mouse
model of cholera as the parental strain (data not shown). Strain NTCP
was constructed by transduction of the
tcpA::mTn5 allele from SC338
(10) into N16961 with a temperature-sensitive mutant of the
generalized transducing phage CP-T1 (19, 27). The
mTn5 insertion in tcpA in one transductant, designated NTCP, was confirmed by Southern blot analysis (data not
shown). The N16961 wbfB::pSC95 strain, MA393, was
made by plasmid integration of pSC95 into the wbfB locus.
This plasmid contains an internal fragment of wbfB inserted
into the suicide vector pGP704 (10, 26). To construct MA393,
SM10
pir(pSC95) was mated on Luria-Bertani (LB) (12) agar
plates with N16961. Exconjugants were then selected as streptomycin-
and ampicillin-resistant colonies. Southern blot analysis was used to
confirm the integration of pSC95 into wbfB in MA393 (data
not shown).
Intestinal colonization assay.
A modified version of the
method of Baselski and Parker (5) was used for infection and
recovery of V. cholerae from the suckling mouse intestine.
Briefly, 4- to 5-day-old suckling CD-1 mice were separated from their
mothers 1 h prior to inoculation with V. cholerae.
Then, the mice were intragastrically inoculated with cultures of
V. cholerae that had been grown overnight and then diluted
in LB broth. The cells for the inocula were grown at 30°C in LB broth
supplemented with 50 µg of streptomycin per ml (for all strains), 50 µg of ampicillin per ml (for MA393), and 30 µg of kanamycin per ml
(for NTCP). Each overnight culture was diluted 1:1,000 in LB containing
8 µl of blue food-coloring dye per ml. Each mouse was then inoculated
with 50 µl of the diluted culture as previously described
(7). The bacterial titers in each inoculum were determined
by plating serial dilutions of the inocula on the appropriate plates.
Infected mice were kept at 26°C in the absence of their mothers. Mice
were sacrificed at the designated time points, and the small and large
bowels as well as the ceca were removed. The small bowel was cut into
three segments of equal length, designated the proximal, middle, and distal small intestines. The cecum and large bowel, extending all the
way to the rectum, were also separated. Each of these five segments was
then mechanically homogenized in 4.5 ml of LB containing 20% (vol/vol)
glycerol with a Tissue Tearor (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, Okla.),
and serial dilutions were plated onto LB agar supplemented with 100 µg of streptomycin per ml to enumerate V. cholerae CFU per
segment. The detection limit for this assay is 150 CFU/segment.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Wild-type V. cholerae infection profiles.
Determination of the population dynamics of wild-type El Tor and
classical V. cholerae strains along the entire length of the
GI tracts of infected suckling mice describes an important parameter of
the host-pathogen interaction and establishes a baseline for comparison
of the colonization properties of mutant V. cholerae strains. For the studies of wild-type V. cholerae intestinal
population dynamics, we chose El Tor strain N16961 because it is the
subject of the ongoing V. cholerae genome project and
classical strain O395 because it has been the subject of many previous
investigations. Either N16961 or O395 was intragastrically inoculated
into suckling mice. Then, at various times after inoculation, the GI
tract was dissected and the total number of V. cholerae CFU
in each segment was determined. At each time point tested, the total
number of recoverable CFU represents the sum of the cells present in
the input and their progeny minus the number of cells that were killed or excreted in the stool. Figures 1 and
2 depict the infection profiles for
N16961 and O395, respectively. Panel A in each figure shows the percent
recovery of input from the entire GI tract, excluding the stomach. In
preliminary experiments, we found that the stomach contained no
detectable CFU at the time points tested. Panel B in each figure shows
the percent recovery of input from the small bowel only. Finally, panel
C in each figure shows the number of V. cholerae CFU in
various segments of the GI tract, including the proximal, middle, and
distal small bowels, the cecum, and the large bowel. Panels A and B
show the average percent recovery from multiple experiments. However,
due to the variability in absolute numbers of CFU recovered from
intestinal segments in different experiments, the data shown in panels
C are from single experiments which are representative of multiple
experiments performed.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Wild-type V. cholerae N16961 (El Tor biotype)
recovery from GI tracts of suckling mice over time. Five-day-old CD-1
mice were intragastrically inoculated with between 105 and
107 CFU as described in Material and Methods. Intestinal
segments were aseptically removed and processed for bacterial
quantification. (A) Percent CFU recovery from entire GI tract. For each
time point, CFU from all segments were added and expressed as a
percentage of the inoculum given to the mice at time zero. The averages
and standard deviations of CFU recovered from four mice are shown. (B)
Percent CFU recovery from small bowel. (C) Number of V. cholerae CFU recovered from indicated segments at various times
postinoculation. The data are the averages from two mice from a single
experiment in which the inoculum was 3 × 105 CFU.
Columns with asterisks above them were below the limit of detection for
this assay (150 CFU).
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Wild-type V. cholerae O395 (classical
biotype) recovery from GI tracts of suckling mice. (A) CFU recovery as
a percentage of input (between 2 × 105 and 3 × 106) from entire GI tracts of four mice as described in the
legend for Fig. 1A. (B) CFU recovery as a percentage of input from
small bowel. (C) CFU per segment from a pair of mice inoculated with
2 × 105 CFU, as described in the legend for Fig.
1C.
|
|
During the 24 h of intestinal growth following intragastric
inoculation, the total number of recoverable CFU of both N16961 and
O395 increased 10-fold or more (Fig. 1A and 2A). However, the infection
profiles for the classical and El Tor biotype strains differed
significantly. With N16961 (El Tor), a rapid loss (~50%) of total
recoverable CFU by 1 h postinoculation was observed and the total
recoverable number of N16961 CFU was not greater than the input number
until after 10 h postinfection (Fig. 1A). Since this significant
loss of CFU was apparent as early as 1 h after inoculation, a time
point when few if any CFU had passed through to the cecum and large
bowel, there must have been killing of the El Tor V. cholerae strain in the stomach and/or small bowel at the early
stage of infection. In contrast, for O395 there was no detectable
diminution in the number of recoverable CFU at the early time points
following inoculation (Fig. 2A). At the 1-h time point, the percentage
of recoverable CFU of N16961 was significantly lower than that for O395
(P < 0.08 by the Mann-Whitney U test). Since there may
be cell loss as well as cell multiplication in the intestine, it is
possible that there is significant loss of O395 CFU during the early
time points after inoculation which is obscured by the intraintestinal
growth of this classical strain.
For both V. cholerae biotypes, there were significant
differences in the recovery of CFU from the three small bowel segments. For each time point tested, with the exception of the first, the proximal small bowel had lower numbers of both V. cholerae
biotypes than the middle and distal small bowel segments (Fig. 1C and
2C). The numbers of recoverable N16961 and O395 CFU increased most dramatically in the middle small bowel segment, especially during the
latter time points (Fig. 1C and 2C). For N16961, the largest increase
in cell numbers occurred in the middle small bowel segment in the
interval between 10 and 24 h after inoculation, and for O395, this
increase occurred in the interval between 5 and 10 h after
inoculation. Similarly, in the distal segment of the small bowel, the
number of recoverable CFU of both biotypes, also increased during the
latter time points after inoculation. Since the distal segment is
downstream of the middle small bowel segment, the apparent principal
site of V. cholerae multiplication, we cannot say to what
extent these increased cell numbers are the product of in situ
multiplication versus flowthrough from the middle segment.
The finding that there are greater numbers of CFU recovered for each
time point in the middle small bowel segment than in the proximal small
bowel segment suggested the possibility that our division of the small
intestine into three equal segments resulted in the combination of a
region of the proximal small bowel that is not at all permissive for
V. cholerae growth with a region similar to the middle
segment that is permissive for V. cholerae growth. To
investigate whether there is a region of the upper small bowel which is
resistant to V. cholerae colonization, we dissected
contiguous 1-cm segments beginning at the junction of the stomach and
duodenum (pylorus) 10 h after intragastric inoculation of O395.
All segments yielded recoverable O395, demonstrating that there is not
a region of the proximal small bowel which is absolutely resistant to
colonization; however, in each mouse there was a particular segment, 4 to 6 cm from the pylorus, which had at least 10-fold more recoverable
O395 CFU than the more proximal segments. Data from a representative
mouse are shown in Fig. 3. The mean
numbers of CFU recovered from segments 1 to 6 were significantly less
than those from segments 7 to 10 (P < 0.017 by
Student's two-tailed t test). Histologic studies attempting
to identify differences in this region of the suckling CD-1 mouse small
intestine are under way.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Wild-type V. cholerae O395 (classical
biotype) recovery from segments of the small bowel of a suckling mouse.
The mouse was intragastrically inoculated with 3 × 106 CFU, and CFU were recovered from 1-cm segments
proceeding from the pylorus (x-axis origin) toward the cecum
10 h after infection. The numbers of CFU recovered from three of
the segments are shown above their bars in parentheses.
|
|
Passage of V. cholerae through the ~14-cm-long suckling
mouse small bowel occurred fairly rapidly for both biotypes. There were
no V. cholerae CFU in the cecum or large bowel at 1 h
after inoculation, but there were significant numbers of CFU present in
these organs by 3 h postinoculation (Fig. 1C and 2C). Although the
large bowel is not believed to be the site of V. cholerae intestinal colonization, significant numbers of cells of both V. cholerae biotypes were recovered from the cecum and large bowel. Because of our experimental design, it is difficult to discern whether
these CFU were the product of in situ multiplication or flowthrough of
cells which colonized the small bowel. For the classical strain O395,
Fig. 2A and B are nearly superimposable, with the exception of the 3-h
and possibly the 5-h time points, indicating that most O395 replication
is occurring within the small intestine. For the El Tor strain N16961,
there is apparently some replication and/or survival in the large
bowel, since Fig. 1A and B are not superimposable, especially at the 5- and 10-h time points. Thus, El Tor strains may be more proficient at
colonizing the large bowel (see below). Despite the fact that the cecum
is nearly 10 times shorter than each of the other intestinal segments we studied, comparable numbers of CFU were recovered from this segment.
This may reflect the fact that in the mouse the cecum is a
dead-end-like pouch extending off of the distal small bowel and may
therefore accumulate cells exiting the small bowel. However, as for the
large bowel, it is also possible that there is V. cholerae colonization of and multiplication within the cecum.
TcpA mutant strain infection profiles.
TcpA is the repeated
polypeptide subunit of TCP and is an essential V. cholerae
intestinal colonization factor. In competition experiments, when a
tcpA strain is coinoculated with a wild-type strain, the
competitive index observed is typically 10
3 to
10
4 in the suckling mouse small bowel; i.e., the
tcpA strain is outcompeted approximately 1,000- to
10,000-fold by the wild type over a 24-h period (1, 30, 33).
It is not known if tcpA strains survive and replicate within
the small bowel when present as the sole inoculum or in the large
intestine (which is usually not assayed in competition experiments). To
begin to assess this, we infected suckling mice with tcpA
derivatives of N16961 and O395 and observed the population dynamics of
these cells at the time points we used to study the population dynamics
of the wild-type strains. Figures 4 and
5 represent infection profiles of
tcpA derivatives of N16961 and O395, respectively.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
V. cholerae N16961 tcpA recovery
from GI tracts of suckling mice. (A) CFU recovery as a percentage of
input (between 3 × 105 and 4 × 106)
from entire GI tracts of four mice as described in the legend for Fig.
1A. (B) CFU recovery as a percentage of input from small bowel. (C) CFU
per segment from a pair of mice inoculated with 4 × 106 CFU, as described in the legend for Fig. 1C.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
V. cholerae O395 tcpA recovery
from GI tracts of suckling mice. (A) CFU recovery as a percentage of
input (between 5 × 105 and 5 × 106)
from entire GI tracts of five mice, as described in the legend for Fig.
1A. (B) CFU recovery as a percentage of input from small bowel. (C) CFU
per segment from a pair of mice inoculated with 5 × 105 CFU, as described in the legend for Fig. 1C.
|
|
It was surprising to observe that for NTCP, the tcpA
derivative of N16961, the percents recovery of CFU from the entire
intestinal tract at each time point observed were not as dramatically
reduced as predicted from the previously determined competitive index of this strain (1.6 × 10
3) (Fig. 4A). However, at
24 h, there is a large reduction (nearly 1,000-fold) in the
numbers of NTCP CFU recovered from the small intestine compared with
those of N16961 (Fig. 4B), demonstrating that TCP is a specific factor
for small intestinal colonization. The survival (and potentially
multiplication) of NTCP in the cecum and large bowel (Fig. 4C)
indicates that TCP is not required for colonization of this niche and
may suggest that El Tor V. cholerae possesses additional
colonization factors for growth in the large bowel.
O395 exhibited progressive increases in recoverable CFU over the
duration of the experiment (Fig. 2A and B), whereas the tcpA derivative of O395, TCP2, exhibited progressive decreases in the number
of recoverable CFU during the experiment (Fig. 5A and B). In multiple
experiments, TCP2 colonized the cecum and large bowel less efficiently
than NTCP (e.g., Fig. 4C versus 5C), suggesting that classical strains
may be less adapted for this host niche. To further explore this
possibility, a competition assay was done between TCP2 and NTCP.
Twenty-four hours after intragastric inoculation of equal numbers of
both these tcpA strains, there were almost no recoverable
CFU of either biotype from the small bowel, but there were more than
100 times more recoverable NTCP CFU than TCP2 CFU from the large bowel
(data not shown). This result further suggests that El Tor strains may
have colonization factors other than TCP that facilitate growth and
multiplication in the large bowel. This finding might explain the
clinical observation that El Tor strains of V. cholerae tend
to colonize the human GI tract for longer periods than classical
strains (3).
As with infections by N16961 and O395, recovery of NTCP CFU and TCP2
CFU in the cecum and large bowel occurred only 3 h
postinoculation, suggesting that these tcpA strains pass
through the small bowel at a rate similar to that of the parental
strains. At 1 h postinoculation, a time point when all the
recoverable NTCP CFU and TCP2 CFU are still in the small bowel (Fig. 4C
and 5C), the percents recovery of NTCP and TCP2 are very similar to the
percents recovery of N16961 and O395, respectively (Fig. 4B versus 1B
and 5B versus 2B). This suggests that TCP does not function as a
bacterial factor which imparts resistance to a host intestinal killing
activity, as had been previously proposed (11, 28).
LPS mutant strain infection profiles.
The V. cholerae
wbfB and wbfD (formerly rfbB and
rfbD) genes are part of an operon that is required for
biosynthesis of perosamine, the repeated carbohydrate moiety of the LPS
O1 OA (32, 35). Strains harboring mutations within this
operon lack OA and have been shown to be severely attenuated for
colonization in suckling mice (23). Figures
6 and 7
depict the infection profiles for N16961 wbfB (strain MA393)
and O395 wbfD (strain O395R-1), respectively. As with the
tcpA strains, there is no net growth of either
wbf strain after 24 h (Fig. 6A and 7A); however, during
the 10- to 24-h interval, unlike the tcpA strains, these
wbf strains did grow to a limited extent in the small
intestine and perhaps in the large bowel (Fig. 6B and C and 7B and C).
Since the data in Fig. 4 and 5 indicate that TCP is required for small
intestinal colonization, the observation that there is some small bowel
colonization by these two OA
strains suggests that there
is at least some functional TCP production by the latter strains. This
finding contradicts a recent report (23) suggesting that
V. cholerae strains lacking OA are defective in assembling
TCP on the cell surface.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
V. cholerae N16961 wbfB recovery
from GI tracts of suckling mice. (A) CFU recovery as a percentage of
input (between 2 × 105 and 6 × 106)
from entire GI tracts of two mice, as described in the legend for Fig.
1A. (B) CFU recovery as a percentage of input from small bowel. (C) CFU
per segment from a pair of mice inoculated with 3 × 106 CFU, as described in the legend for Fig. 1C.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
V. cholerae O395 wbfD recovery
from GI tracts of suckling mice. (A) CFU recovery as a percentage of
input (between 2 × 105 and 1 × 106)
from entire GI tracts of four mice, as described in the legend for Fig.
1A. (B) CFU recovery as a percentage of input from small bowel. (C) CFU
per segment from a pair of mice inoculated with 2 × 105 CFU, as described in the legend for Fig. 1C.
|
|
For the two wbf strains, at times up to and including 5 h postinoculation, the percent recovery of CFU is similar to the
percent recovery for wild-type parental strains (Fig. 1A versus 6A and 2A versus 7A), suggesting that these OA
strains are not
more susceptible to host bactericidal factors in the GI tract than the
wild-type parental strains. However, the percent recovery of CFU in the
small bowel for the OA
strains was markedly reduced at
later time points during infection compared to that for the wild-type
parental strains (Fig. 1B versus 6B and 2B versus 7B), suggesting that
OA is necessary for full colonization of this segment of the GI tract.
Conclusions.
Our studies characterizing the infection profiles
of wild-type El Tor and classical biotype V. cholerae
strains should prove useful as a baseline for future studies of
V. cholerae strains harboring mutations in virulence genes,
as well as for studies of host factors which influence colonization.
For example, it is interesting that in suckling mice, like in humans,
the middle small bowel is the main site of colonization by V. cholerae (2). Is this reflective of the distribution of
the hypothesized but hitherto unidentified TCP receptor? An alternative
explanation which warrants investigation is that maximal colonization
of the middle small bowel may simply reflect the requirement for a
short period of adaptation within the host GI tract, in this case
occurring during passage through the stomach and proximal small bowel,
for proper induction of V. cholerae colonization factors.
Although colonization of the large bowel by V. cholerae has
largely been ignored by researchers, our finding that both El Tor and
classical biotype strains can colonize this organ exceedingly well in
suckling mice suggests the possibility that similar colonization may
occur during human infections. Although we did not search for V. cholerae factors required for colonization of the cecum and large
bowel, this study demonstrates that such colonization by an El Tor
biotype strain occurred in the absence of TCP and that OA was not
required for colonization of these organs by either biotype. The
ability of an El Tor biotype strain to colonize the cecum and large
bowel in a TCP-independent manner is interesting in light of recent
findings that TCP expression as well as expression of other virulence
factors in the ToxR-TcpP-ToxT regulon can phase-vary on and off via
slipped-strand mispairing in tcpH(9).
Colonization of the cecum and large bowel by TCP
V. cholerae cells might contribute to the shedding of V. cholerae by asymptomatic carriers and by some convalescing
patients and could play a role in the dissemination of this organism.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health
grants to M.K.W. (AI 42347) and A.C. (AI 40262), Pew Scholars awards in
the Biomedical Sciences to M.K.W. and A.C., and the Center for
Gastroenterology Research on Absorptive and Secretory Processes, NEMC
(P30 DK34928).
M.J.A. and J.S. contributed equally to this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address for Matthew K. Waldor: Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases,
Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111. Phone: (617) 636-7618. Fax: (617) 636-5292. E-mail:
matthew.waldor{at}es.nemc.org. Mailing address for Andrew
Camilli: Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts
University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. Phone: (617) 636-6653. Fax: (617) 636-0337. E-mail:
acamilli{at}opal.tufts.edu.
Editor:
J. T. Barbieri
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Attridge, S. R.,
P. A. Manning,
J. Holmgren, and G. Jonson.
1996.
Relative significance of mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin and toxin-coregulated pili in colonization of infant mice by Vibrio cholerae El Tor.
Infect. Immun.
64:3369-3373[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Banwell, J. G.,
N. F. Pierce,
R. C. Mitra,
K. L. Brigham,
G. J. Caranasos,
R. I. Keimowitz,
D. S. Fedson,
J. Thomas,
S. L. Gorbach,
R. B. Sack, and A. Mondal.
1970.
Intestinal fluid and electrolyte transport in human cholera.
J. Clin. Investig.
49:183-195.
|
| 3.
|
Barua, D., and W. B. Greenough.
1992.
Cholera.
Plenum Medical Book Company, New York, N.Y.
|
| 4.
|
Baselski, V. S.,
R. A. Medina, and C. D. Parker.
1979.
In vivo and in vitro characterization of virulence-deficient mutants of Vibrio cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
24:111-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Baselski, V. S., and C. D. Parker.
1978.
Intestinal distribution of Vibrio cholerae in orally infected infant mice: kinetics of recovery of radiolabel and viable cells.
Infect. Immun.
21:518-525[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Baselski, V. S.,
S. Upchurch, and C. D. Parker.
1978.
Isolation and phenotypic characterization of virulence-deficient mutants of Vibrio cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
22:181-188[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Camilli, A.,
D. Beattie, and J. Mekalanos.
1994.
Use of genetic recombination as a reporter of gene expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2634-2638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Camilli, A., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1995.
Use of recombinase gene fusions to identify Vibrio cholerae genes induced during infection.
Mol. Microbiol.
18:671-683[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Carroll, P. A.,
K. T. Tashima,
M. B. Rogers,
V. J. DiRita, and S. B. Calderwood.
1997.
Phase variation in tcpH modulates expression of the ToxR regulon in Vibrio cholerae.
Mol. Microbiol.
25:1099-1111[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Chiang, S. L., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1998.
Use of signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis to identify Vibrio cholerae genes critical for colonization.
Mol. Microbiol.
27:797-805[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Chiang, S. L.,
R. K. Taylor,
M. Koomey, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1995.
Single amino acid substitutions in the N-terminus of Vibrio cholerae TcpA affect colonization, autoagglutination, and serum resistance.
Mol. Microbiol.
17:1133-1142[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Davis, R. W.,
D. Botstein, and J. R. Roth.
1980.
Advanced bacterial genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 13.
|
Everiss, K. D.,
K. J. Hughes,
M. E. Kovach, and K. M. Peterson.
1994.
The Vibrio cholerae acfB colonization determinant encodes an inner membrane protein that is related to a family of signal-transducing proteins.
Infect. Immun.
62:3289-3298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Franzon, V. L.,
A. Barker, and P. A. Manning.
1993.
Nucleotide sequence encoding the mannose-fucose-resistant hemagglutinin of Vibrio cholerae O1 and construction of a mutant.
Infect. Immun.
61:3032-3037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Freter, R., and P. C. M. O'Brien.
1981.
Role of chemotaxis in the association of motile bacteria with intestinal mucosa: fitness and virulence of nonchemotactic Vibrio cholerae mutants in infant mice.
Infect. Immun.
34:222-233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Freter, R.,
P. C. M. O'Brien, and M. S. Macsai.
1981.
Role of chemotaxis in the association of motile bacteria with intestinal mucosa: in vivo studies.
Infect. Immun.
34:234-240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Gangarosa, E. J.,
W. R. Beisel,
C. Benyajati,
H. Sprinz, and P. Piyaratn.
1960.
The nature of the gastrointestinal lesion in Asiatic cholera and its relationship to pathogenesis: a biopsy study.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
9:125-135.
|
| 18.
|
Gill, D. M.
1977.
Mechanism of action of cholera toxin.
Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res.
8:85-118[Medline].
|
| 19.
| Hava, D. L., and A. Camilli. Submitted for
publication.
|
| 20.
|
Henderson, D. P., and S. M. Payne.
1994.
Vibrio cholerae iron transport systems: roles of heme and siderophore iron transport in virulence and identification of a gene associated with multiple iron transport systems.
Infect. Immun.
62:5120-5125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Herrington, D. A.,
R. H. Hall,
G. Losonsky,
J. J. Mekalanos,
R. K. Taylor, and M. M. Levine.
1988.
Toxin, toxin-coregulated pili, and the toxR regulon are essential for Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in humans.
J. Exp. Med.
168:1487-1492[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Hughes, K. J.,
K. D. Everiss,
M. E. Kovach, and K. M. Peterson.
1995.
Isolation and characterization of the Vibrio cholerae acfA gene, required for efficient intestinal colonization.
Gene
156:59-61[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Iredell, J. R.,
U. H. Stroeher,
H. M. Ward, and P. A. Manning.
1998.
Lipopolysaccharide O-antigen expression and the effect of its absence on virulence in rfb mutants of Vibrio cholerae O1.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
20:45-54[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kaper, J. B.,
H. Lockman,
M. M. Baldini, and M. M. Levine.
1984.
Recombinant nontoxinogenic Vibrio cholerae strains as attenuated cholera vaccine candidates.
Nature
308:655-658[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Levine, M. M.,
J. B. Kaper,
R. E. Black, and M. L. Clements.
1983.
New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development.
Microbiol. Rev.
47:510-550[Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Miller, V. L., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1988.
A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR.
J. Bacteriol.
170:2575-2583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Ogg, J. E.,
T. L. Timme, and M. M. Alemohammad.
1981.
General transduction in Vibrio cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
31:737-741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Parsot, C.,
E. Taxman, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1991.
ToxR regulates the production of lipoproteins and the expression of serum resistance in Vibrio cholerae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1641-1645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Peterson, K. M., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1988.
Characterization of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon: identification of novel genes involved in intestinal colonization.
Infect. Immun.
56:2822-2829[Abstract/Free Full Text]. (Erratum, 57:660, 1989.)
|
| 30.
|
Rhine, J. A., and R. K. Taylor.
1994.
TcpA pilin sequences and colonization requirements for O1 and O139 Vibrio cholerae.
Mol. Microbiol.
13:1013-1020[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Richardson, S. H.
1994.
Animal models in cholera research, p. 203-226.
In
I. K. Wachsmuth, P. A. Blake, and Ø. Olsvik (ed.), Vibrio cholerae and cholera: molecular to global perspectives. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 32.
|
Stroeher, U. H.,
L. E. Karageorgos,
M. H. Brown,
R. Morona, and P. A. Manning.
1995.
A putative pathway for perosamine biosynthesis is the first function encoded within the rfb region of Vibrio cholerae O1.
Gene
166:33-42[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Taylor, R. K.,
V. L. Miller,
D. B. Furlong, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1987.
Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:2833-2837[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Waldor, M. K.,
R. Colwell, and J. J. Mekalanos.
1994.
The Vibrio cholerae O139 serogroup antigen includes O-antigen capsule and lipopolysaccharide virulence determinants.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:11388-11392[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ward, H. M., and P. A. Manning.
1989.
Mapping of chromosomal loci associated with lipopolysaccharide synthesis and serotype specificity in Vibrio cholerae O1 by transposon mutagenesis using Tn5 and Tn2680.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
218:367-370[Medline].
|
Infection and Immunity, August 1999, p. 3733-3739, Vol. 67, No. 8
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sikora, A. E., Lybarger, S. R., Sandkvist, M.
(2007). Compromised Outer Membrane Integrity in Vibrio cholerae Type II Secretion Mutants. J. Bacteriol.
189: 8484-8495
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Olivier, V., Salzman, N. H., Satchell, K. J. F.
(2007). Prolonged Colonization of Mice by Vibrio cholerae El Tor O1 Depends on Accessory Toxins. Infect. Immun.
75: 5043-5051
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quinones, M., Davis, B. M., Waldor, M. K.
(2006). Activation of the Vibrio cholerae SOS Response Is Not Required for Intestinal Cholera Toxin Production or Colonization. Infect. Immun.
74: 927-930
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hung, D. T., Shakhnovich, E. A., Pierson, E., Mekalanos, J. J.
(2005). Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Vibrio cholerae Virulence and Intestinal Colonization. Science
310: 670-674
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alam, A., LaRocque, R. C., Harris, J. B., Vanderspurt, C., Ryan, E. T., Qadri, F., Calderwood, S. B.
(2005). Hyperinfectivity of Human-Passaged Vibrio cholerae Can Be Modeled by Growth in the Infant Mouse. Infect. Immun.
73: 6674-6679
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Haines, G. K. III, Sayed, B. A., Rohrer, M. S., Olivier, V., Satchell, K. J. F.
(2005). Role of Toll-Like Receptor 4 in the Proinflammatory Response to Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Strains Deficient in Production of Cholera Toxin and Accessory Toxins. Infect. Immun.
73: 6157-6164
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dziejman, M., Serruto, D., Tam, V. C., Sturtevant, D., Diraphat, P., Faruque, S. M., Rahman, M. H., Heidelberg, J. F., Decker, J., Li, L., Montgomery, K. T., Grills, G., Kucherlapati, R., Mekalanos, J. J.
(2005). Genomic characterization of non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae reveals genes for a type III secretion system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 3465-3470
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Angelichio, M. J., Merrell, D. S., Camilli, A.
(2004). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Acid Adaptation-Mediated Vibrio cholerae Hyperinfectivity. Infect. Immun.
72: 2405-2407
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Faruque, S. M., Chowdhury, N., Kamruzzaman, M., Dziejman, M., Rahman, M. H., Sack, D. A., Nair, G. B., Mekalanos, J. J.
(2004). Genetic diversity and virulence potential of environmental Vibrio cholerae population in a cholera-endemic area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 2123-2128
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ding, Y., Waldor, M. K.
(2003). Deletion of a Vibrio cholerae ClC Channel Results in Acid Sensitivity and Enhanced Intestinal Colonization. Infect. Immun.
71: 4197-4200
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moller, A. K., Leatham, M. P., Conway, T., Nuijten, P. J. M., de Haan, L. A. M., Krogfelt, K. A., Cohen, P. S.
(2003). An Escherichia coli MG1655 Lipopolysaccharide Deep-Rough Core Mutant Grows and Survives in Mouse Cecal Mucus but Fails To Colonize the Mouse Large Intestine. Infect. Immun.
71: 2142-2152
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Faruque, S. M., Kamruzzaman, M., Meraj, I. M., Chowdhury, N., Nair, G. B., Sack, R. B., Colwell, R. R., Sack, D. A.
(2003). Pathogenic Potential of Environmental Vibrio cholerae Strains Carrying Genetic Variants of the Toxin-Coregulated Pilus Pathogenicity Island. Infect. Immun.
71: 1020-1025
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mey, A. R., Wyckoff, E. E., Oglesby, A. G., Rab, E., Taylor, R. K., Payne, S. M.
(2002). Identification of the Vibrio cholerae Enterobactin Receptors VctA and IrgA: IrgA Is Not Required for Virulence. Infect. Immun.
70: 3419-3426
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, S. H., Butler, S. M., Camilli, A.
(2001). Selection for in vivo regulators of bacterial virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 6889-6894
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
MITRA, RUPAK.K., NANDY, R. K., RAMAMURTHY, T., BHATTACHARYA, S. K., YAMASAKI, S., SHIMADA, T., TAKEDA, Y., NAIR, G. B.
(2001). Molecular characterisation of rough variants of Vibrio cholerae isolated from hospitalised patients with diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol
50: 268-276
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Merrell, D. S., Tischler, A. D., Lee, S. H., Camilli, A.
(2000). Vibrio cholerae Requires rpoS for Efficient Intestinal Colonization. Infect. Immun.
68: 6691-6696
[Abstract]
[Full Text]