Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, January 2000, p. 197-204, Vol. 68, No. 1
Departments of Internal
Medicine1 and
Pathology,2 Saint Louis University
Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received 24 March 1999/Returned for modification 18 May
1999/Accepted 11 October 1999
In general, gamma interferon (IFN- Trypanosoma cruzi is the
protozoan parasite causing Chagas' disease in South and Central
America. The T. cruzi life cycle is complex and
includes both extracellular and intracellular forms in the
mammalian host. Extracellular blood form
trypomastigotes (BFT) circulate in the blood and lymph
and can infect many different types of nucleated mammalian target
cells. After infection of host cells, BFT differentiate into
intracellular amastigotes (AMA), the life stage of T. cruzi
responsible for replication within the mammalian host. During the first
few weeks of T. cruzi infection in humans, BFT may be
detected by microscopic examination of fresh blood. By the end of the
first 2 months of infection, BFT decrease to undetectable levels as
intracellular AMA proliferation is controlled by innate and adaptive
immune responses, but low levels of intracellular tissue parasitism
persist for the life of the host (18, 40). Mice infected
with T. cruzi have been used as a model for the human
disease because they also develop detectable parasitemias during acute
infection, followed by chronic tissue parasitism. Different strains of
mice exhibit various patterns of acute disease, which also vary
depending on the different isolates of T. cruzi used. BALB/c
mice are relatively susceptible to infection with the Tulahuén
strain of T. cruzi in that they develop high-level parasitemias which can lead to mortality in a large proportion of
animals after challenge with infective parasites (3, 31, 43, 49,
52). C57BL/6 mice are relatively resistant to similar challenges
(26, 35, 36, 48, 49). Patterns of susceptibility and
resistance to T. cruzi have been shown to be determined by factors other than the genetic haplotype at the H-2 locus
alone (47, 53). Comparisons of immune responses activated by
the Tulahuén strain of T. cruzi infection in these
different mouse strains can be useful as one model system for the
identification of factors associated with resistance.
CD4+ Th1 lymphocytes that produce the cytokines
interleukin-2 (IL-2) and gamma interferon (IFN- In the present work, we have extended these earlier observations by
directly investigating the relationship between parasite-specific CD4+ Th1 responses and protection against
T. cruzi infection. We first examined the ability
of immunization protocols that induce T. cruzi-specific
CD4+ Th1 cell responses to protect relatively susceptible
BALB/c mice against virulent parasite challenges. We generated stable
parasite-specific Th1 and Th2 cell lines and studied the ability of
these cells to inhibit T. cruzi replication in vitro. We
also investigated the ability of our T. cruzi-specific
CD4+ Th1 cell lines to adoptively transfer protection
against T. cruzi infection. Finally, we studied total and
CD4-depleted, naive and memory immune lymphocytes for their ability to
transfer protection to SCID mice. The combined results of these
experiments indicate that although CD4+ Th1 cells can
mediate both direct effector and helper functions for protective
T. cruzi immunity, the helper functions may be more
important in vivo.
Cytokine, antibody, and antigen reagents.
Recombinant murine
IFN- Parasites, mice, and T. cruzi challenge
protocols.
The life cycle of the Tulahuén strain of T. cruzi was maintained by passage through mice and the reduviid
vector Dipetalogaster maximus (16). To collect
insect-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes (IMT),
infected reduviid bugs were allowed to feed on anesthetized mice and
then engorged insects were incubated in glass vials for 3 to 4 h.
Excreta from multiple reduviids were pooled, and the concentration of
IMT was determined by direct hemocytometer count. BFT were maintained
by intraperitoneal passage in BALB/c mice. To prepare BFT for virulent
challenges, C.B-17 SCID mice were infected intraperitoneally with
20,000 to 50,000 BFT and 2 to 3 weeks later these animals were
sacrificed by decapitation and bled into 50-ml conical tubes containing
5 µl of preservative-free heparin (1,000 U/ml) per animal. The
mononuclear cell layers of heparinized blood containing T. cruzi BFT were purified over Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech,
Uppsala, Sweden) density gradients spun at 800 × g for
15 min at room temperature. After the purified cells were washed with
PBS, the concentrations of BFT were determined by hemocytometer.
0019-9567/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Involvement of CD4+ Th1 Cells in Systemic Immunity
Protective against Primary and Secondary Challenges with
Trypanosoma cruzi
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
)-producing CD4+
Th1 cells are important for the immunological control of
intracellular pathogens. We previously demonstrated an association
between parasite-specific induction of IFN-
responses and resistance
to the intracellular protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi. To
investigate a potential causal relationship between Th1 responses and
T. cruzi resistance, we studied the ability of Th1 cells to
protect susceptible BALB/c mice against virulent parasite challenges.
We developed immunization protocols capable of inducing polarized Th1
and Th2 responses in vivo. Induction of parasite-specific Th1
responses, but not Th2 responses, protected BALB/c mice against
virulent T. cruzi challenges. We generated T. cruzi-specific CD4+ Th1 and Th2 cell lines from
BALB/c mice that were activated by infected macrophages to produce
their corresponding cytokine response profiles. Th1 cells, but not
Th2 cells, induced nitric oxide production and inhibited
intracellular parasite replication in T. cruzi-infected macrophages. Despite the ability to inhibit parasite replication in
vitro, Th1 cells alone could not adoptively transfer protection against
T. cruzi to SCID mice. In addition, despite
the fact that the adoptive transfer of CD4+ T lymphocytes
was shown to be necessary for the development of immunity protective
against primary T. cruzi infection in our SCID mouse model,
protective secondary effector functions could be transferred to SCID
mice from memory-immune BALB/c mice in the absence of
CD4+ T lymphocytes. These results indicate that, although
CD4+ Th1 cells can directly inhibit intracellular parasite
replication, a more important role for these cells in T. cruzi systemic immunity may be to provide helper activity
for the development of other effector functions protective in vivo.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
) have been shown to
be important for systemic protection against a wide spectrum of
intracellular pathogens (reviewed in reference 1).
This type of CD4+ T cell induces macrophage activation
leading to the inhibition of intracellular replication of many
pathogens. In addition, CD4+ Th1 cells can be directly
cytolytic for infected cells and can help in the expansion of cytotoxic
CD8+ T lymphocytes, which recognize and destroy infected
cells. Therefore, it is predicted that CD4+ Th1 lymphocytes
are important for protection against T. cruzi infection.
IFN-
has been identified as a resistance factor in T. cruzi infections (20, 32, 46). The administration of recombinant IFN-
to mice increases their resistance, while the in
vivo neutralization of IFN-
with monoclonal antibodies increases susceptibility. These studies demonstrated that circulating IFN-
is
crucial for the control of an ongoing acute T. cruzi
infection but did not address the potential relevance of IFN-
responses for memory immunity induced by protective vaccines. Parasite
antigens have been shown to induce increased IFN-
mRNA and protein
levels in lymphocytes from T. cruzi-infected mice,
indicating that antigen-specific immune cells capable of secreting
IFN-
are present during parasite infection
(27). Furthermore, we have shown that during acute T. cruzi infection, antigen-specific lymphocytes that
secrete high levels of IFN-
after stimulation with parasite lysate
in vitro develop in T. cruzi-resistant C57BL/6 mice but not
in susceptible BALB/c mice (9). These results suggest that
the induction of T. cruzi-specific CD4+ Th1
lymphocytes by vaccines prior to T. cruzi infection could be
protective against parasite challenge.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
was supplied by Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, Calif.)
and had a specific activity of 9.8 × 106 U/ml
(7.35 × 106 U/mg). Recombinant murine IL-12 (5.6 × 106 U/mg) was obtained from Stanley F. Wolf (Genetics
Institute, Cambridge, Mass.). Concentrated recombinant murine
IL-4 was produced in a Cellmax chamber (Spectrum,
Laguna Hills, Calif.) inoculated with P815 cells transfected with the
murine IL-4 cDNA (obtained from H. Karasuyama, Tokyo Metropolitan
Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
[11]). Murine IL-2 was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Corp., Indianapolis, Ind. The recombinant murine cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 were purchased from Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, Mass. The hybridoma cell lines producing the IFN-
- and
IL-4-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies R4-6A2 and 11B11, respectively,
were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and were
grown in Cellmax chambers (Spectrum) to produce concentrated
antibodies. The monoclonal antibodies GK1.5, Lyt2, and PK136 were
prepared similarly from hybridoma cells obtained from ATCC. Antigenic
lysates of T. cruzi culture-derived metacyclic
trypomastigotes grown in Grace's media were prepared
as described previously (9).
Preparation of lymphocyte populations.
Lymphocytes were
harvested from control and memory-immune BALB/c mice. Memory immune
BALB/c mice had survived acute T. cruzi infection and had
been rechallenged subcutaneously with 5,000 to 20,000 BFT 2 weeks
before harvesting the draining lymph nodes and/or spleen cells. In
studies of the cytokine responses produced by purified CD4+
T cells from immunized mice and in experiments involving adoptive transfers of different fractions of BALB/c splenic lymphocytes into
C.B-17 SCID mice, immunomagnetic purifications and depletions of
CD4+ T cells were performed. Draining lymph node cells from
immunized mice or spleen cells from uninfected mice and memory immune
mice were incubated with Miltenyi anti-CD4 MicroBeads, and then
CD4+ and CD4
cells were separated in MiniMACS
columns as recommended by the manufacturer (Miltenyi Biotec Inc.,
Auburn, Calif.). Fractionated populations were passed through a second
set of MiniMACS columns, resulting in greater than 99% purity of
CD4+ T-cell populations and greater than 99% depletion of
CD4+ T cells from the CD4
populations.
Induction of T. cruzi-specific Th1 and Th2 cell
responses in vivo.
Several variations of Th1 and Th2 immunization
bias protocols were studied in early experiments. Vaccination
parameters investigated included intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous
routes, the delivery of cytokines for 1 to 3 days with each
immunization, and doses of cytokine-neutralizing antibodies. Later
experiments focused on the following protocols found to yield the most
reproducible results. BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with 10 to 25 µg of T. cruzi whole lysate in 50 µl of
phosphate-buffered saline. To bias for Th1 responses, 1 µg of
recombinant IL-12 was injected subcutaneously on three consecutive days
beginning 1 day prior to immunization (mixed with antigen on the day of
immunization). For additional Th1 bias, 0.5 mg of 11B11 monoclonal
anti-IL-4 was injected intraperitoneally 1 day before and then again 2 days after immunization. To bias for Th2 responses, 500 U of
recombinant IL-4 was injected subcutaneously on three consecutive days
beginning 1 day prior to immunization (mixed with antigen on the day of immunization). For additional Th2 bias, 0.5 mg of R4-6A2 monoclonal anti-IFN-
was injected intraperitoneally 1 day before and then again
2 days after immunization. Draining lymph node and spleen cells from
immunized animals were harvested 3 to 14 days later and stimulated in
vitro with 2 or 20 µg of T. cruzi whole lysate/ml without
IL-12, IL-4, or cytokine-specific antibodies. After 3 to 4 days of
incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2, culture supernatants were harvested and tested for levels of IFN-
and IL-4 as previously described (9). In immunization and challenge experiments
BALB/c mice received three vaccinations (the first two with, and the third without, cytokines and/or antibodies) 10 to 14 days apart prior
to challenge with T. cruzi BFT 2 to 4 weeks after the last immunization.
Generation of T. cruzi-specific CD4+ Th1 and Th2 cell lines. BALB/c mice were immunized three times with 25 µg of T. cruzi whole lysate including the Th1 and Th2 biasing protocols described above. Ten days after the last immunization, draining lymph node cells were harvested and stimulated in vitro (4 × 106 cells/ml) with parasite lysate (10 µg/ml) in 24-well tissue culture plates plus IL-12 (1 ng/ml) for Th1 bias or IL-4 (100 U/ml) for Th2 bias. One week later viable cells were purified over Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech) and expanded with recombinant IL-2 in fresh media. Two weeks after the initial in vitro stimulation, this 2-week cycle of parasite lysate plus either IL-12 or IL-4 stimulation followed by IL-2 expansion was repeated. On the day of parasite lysate antigen stimulation, irradiated syngeneic spleen cells from normal BALB/c mice were added as antigen-presenting cells (APC). After these first two antigen stimulation cycles, T cells were passaged with alternating weekly schedules of parasite lysate stimulation (without IL-12 or IL-4) followed by IL-2 expansion. Similar results were obtained when spleen cells from BALB/c mice hyperimmunized by multiple T. cruzi infectious challenges were harvested and subjected to the same in vitro Th1 and Th2 bias protocols.
After at least four cycles of in vitro expansion, T-cell supernatants were evaluated 2 days after stimulation with antigen and irradiated APC for IFN-
and IL-4 levels with the methods described above. To
determine the subset of T cells present in established T-cell lines,
viable cells were stained with fluorescently labeled anti-CD3,
anti-CD4, and anti-CD8 antibodies (PharMingen, San Diego, Calif.) 2 weeks after the last antigen stimulation and analyzed by three-color
flow cytometry (see below). SCID mice were subjected to adoptive
transfer with 5 × 106 of the Th1 cells 14 days after
antigen stimulation and 7 days after IL-2 expansion. SCID mice were
challenged with T. cruzi 1 day after adoptive transfer with
T-cell populations.
In vitro protection assays.
BALB/c mice were given 100 µg
of concanavalin A intraperitoneally to activate peritoneal macrophages.
Four days later, the peritoneal exudate macrophages (PEM) were
harvested from these mice and cultured in eight-well tissue culture
slide chambers (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, Ill.) at
1.25 × 106 cells/well in 500-µl of Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium (DMEM)-10% fetal calf serum (FCS). PEM were
allowed to adhere for 2 to 5 h at 37°C, washed twice with
DMEM-2% FCS, and infected with 6.25 × 106
culture-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes
(multiplicity of infection of 5). These cultures were incubated 3 h longer at 37°C and then washed three times to remove extracellular
parasites. Ficoll-Paque-purified T cells were added at 5 × 104 cells/well. Forty-eight hours after the addition of T
cells, supernatants were collected from these cocultures. Adherent PEM were then fixed with 1% formalin and Giemsa stained (Diff Quik; Dade
International Inc., Miami, Fla.). The number of infected cells per 200 total cells and the average number of intracellular AMA per infected
cell were determined by microscopic examination of the stained slides.
IFN-
and IL-4 levels in the culture supernatants were measured by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described previously
(9), and nitric oxide (NO) levels in the supernatants were
measured by a modified Greiss reaction (7, 8). Controls included uninfected wells to confirm the antigen specificity of cytokine production and wells to which T cells were not added to
determine the level of infection in the absence of any immune response.
Inhibitions of the percentage of cells infected and the average number
of AMA/infected cell were defined as 1
(value with T
cells/value without T cells) × 100.
Detection of T. cruzi-specific Th1 cells expanded in
vivo after adoptive transfer.
Spleen cell suspensions were
prepared from adoptively transferred SCID mice and stimulated in vitro
with parasite lysate or media. After 4 days of stimulation, culture
supernatants were tested for T. cruzi-specific induction of
IFN-
and IL-4 as described above. The spleen cell cultures were fed
fresh media and incubated for three additional days before harvesting
viable mononuclear cells over Ficoll-Paque for fluorescence-activated
cell sorter (FACS) staining.
FACS analyses. Viable cells were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies specific for T- and B-cell surface markers and analyzed by two- or three-color flow analysis with a Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur flow cytometer. The following antibody combinations were used: (i) anti-CD3-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), anti-CD4-phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and anti-CD8-Cy-Chrome; (ii) anti-CD3-FITC and anti-CD4-PE; (iii) anti-CD8-FITC and anti-CD4-PE; and (iv) anti-CD3-FITC and anti-B220-PE. All antibodies were obtained from PharMingen. Lymphocytes were selected for analysis based upon appropriate forward- and side-scatter gating, and the percentages of positively stained cells with each lymphocyte surface marker were determined by using isotype-matched fluorescent control antibodies to set quadrant demarcations in two-parameter dot plots.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Induction of T. cruzi-specific Th1 and Th2 cell
responses in vivo.
To directly address a potential causal
relationship between CD4+ Th1 cells and natural resistance
to T. cruzi, we developed immunization protocols that could
differentially induce Th1 and Th2 cells specific for T. cruzi antigens. BALB/c mice were immunized with whole T. cruzi lysate mixed with cytokines and anticytokine antibodies as
described in Materials and Methods. Total draining lymph node cells and
purified CD4+ T cells were harvested from these mice after
immunization and were stimulated in vitro with whole T. cruzi lysate prior to testing the culture supernatants for levels
of IFN-
and IL-4. Figure 1 shows the
results of one typical immunization experiment. Immunization with
parasite lysate, IL-12, and neutralizing anti-IL-4 monoclonal antibody
resulted in CD4+ T cells capable of producing high levels
of IFN-
but no IL-4 after in vitro stimulation. After immunization
with parasite lysate, IL-4, and neutralizing anti-IFN-
monoclonal
antibody, CD4+ T cells produced IL-4 and not IFN-
in
vitro. These polarized cytokine response profiles were reproducibly
seen especially after identical booster vaccinations (see Th1×2
responses in Fig. 1). Cytokine supernatants containing IFN-
without
IL-4 were also found to contain IL-2 but not IL-5 or IL-10, while
cytokine supernatants containing IL-4 without IFN-
were found to
contain IL-5 and IL-10 but not IL-2 (data not shown). The latter
results further document the selective Th1 and Th2 cytokine profiles
induced by these differential immunization protocols.
|
Immunization protocols inducing T. cruzi-specific Th1
cells are protective against parasite challenge.
After developing
immunization protocols that could induce differential Th1 and Th2
parasite-specific responses prior to infection, we next studied the
effects of these immunization protocols on the levels of protective
immunity against T. cruzi challenge. BALB/c mice were
immunized with the Th1 and Th2 immunization protocols described above
three times 10 to 14 days apart and challenged with 5,000 to 20,000 T. cruzi BFT. Presented in Table
1 are the parasitemia and overall
mortality results, and presented in Fig. 2 are the detailed survival curves from
one representative experiment. Unimmunized negative-control mice all
died of overwhelming parasitemias within the first 2 months after
BFT challenge. Mice immunized with parasite lysate alone or with the
Th2-inducing immunization protocol also developed high-level
parasitemias and almost all died. However, all mice immunized with the
protocol known to induce Th1 cell responses were protected against the
T. cruzi challenge. Mean peak parasitemia levels were 1 log
unit lower in the Th1 induction group, and 100% of these animals
survived for more than 4 months after T. cruzi challenge.
Furthermore, the parasitemias detected in the Th2 bias group, but not
in the control immunized group, were significantly increased compared
with the parasitemias detected in the Th1 bias group (P < 0.05 by t test), suggesting that the induction of Th2
responses actually led to a decrease in protective immunity. Similar
results were seen in multiple experiments with the following cumulative
results for mortality in the experimental groups: (i) controls, 14 of
15 died; (ii) immunization with Th1 bias, 1 of 15 died; and (iii)
immunization with Th2 bias, 9 of 10 died. Survival was significantly
greater in the Th1 bias group than in either of the other groups, as
determined by two-tailed Fisher exact tests (P < 0.01). Overall, these results demonstrated that the selective
induction of T. cruzi-specific Th1 responses, but not Th2
responses, was associated with protection against a normally lethal
systemic parasite challenge.
|
|
T. cruzi-specific CD4+ T cells induced in
vivo can be expanded in vitro to generate stable Th1 and Th2 cell
lines.
Our findings that (i) Th1 cells develop during T. cruzi infection in resistant mice and (ii) the induction of Th1
cells in relatively susceptible mice reduces parasitemias and mortality after parasite challenge strongly indicated that CD4+ Th1
cells are important for protective immunity against T. cruzi. However, previous investigators have published studies
indicating that CD8+ T lymphocytes (33, 34, 44,
45) and antibody responses (13-15, 19, 21, 36, 38, 39,
42) are important for protection against this parasite, and the
results described above have not addressed whether these other immune
responses were important in our resistant-mouse model or in the Th1
immunization model. Therefore, our next goal was to study the
possibility that purified CD4+ Th1 cells could protect SCID
mice from T. cruzi challenge in the absence of other
antigen-specific immune responses. We generated long-term
CD4+ Th1 and Th2 cells specific for T. cruzi
whole lysate as described in Materials and Methods. Figure
3 demonstrates that the Th1 cells were
T. cruzi specific, major histocompatibility complex
(MHC) restricted, and greater than 99% CD3+ and
CD4+. In the experiments presented in Fig. 3A, we
stimulated the T. cruzi-specific Th1 cell line with
either medium alone or parasite lysate, in the presence of
irradiated normal spleen cells harvested from either syngeneic
BALB/c mice (H-2d) or allogeneic C57BL/6 mice
(H-2b) as APC, and then measured the levels of
IFN-
and IL-4 secreted into the culture supernatants. The T. cruzi-specific T cells did not produce detectable levels of either
IFN-
or IL-4 after incubation with media alone in the presence of
MHC-compatible APC or after incubation with parasite lysate in the
presence of MHC-mismatched APC. However, after stimulation with
parasite lysate in the presence of MHC-compatible APC, these same T
cells produced almost 50 U of IFN-
/ml in the absence of detectable
IL-4. These results demonstrate that these T cells are parasite antigen
specific and MHC restricted and that they produce a cytokine profile
consistent with the Th1 type. These T cells also produced IL-2, but not
IL-5, IL-6, or IL-10, in an antigen-specific and MHC-restricted fashion
(data not shown), further confirming their Th1 cytokine profile. In Fig. 3B, it can be seen that virtually all of these T cells express both the CD3 and CD4 proteins, detectable by FACS, on their
surfaces. Coexpression of CD8 on these T cells was not detectable at
any time point (data not shown). These results confirm that these T. cruzi-specific T cells are classical
CD4+ Th1 cells. Similar experiments confirmed the antigen
specificity, MHC restriction, and CD4+ CD8
surface phenotype of the Th2 cells generated (data not shown).
|
T. cruzi-specific Th1 cells, but not Th2 cells, prevent
intracellular parasite replication in vitro.
The ability of
parasite-specific Th1 and Th2 cells to protect against T. cruzi infection was tested in an in vitro model (Fig. 4). T cells were incubated with T. cruzi-infected macrophages, and cytokine and NO responses were
measured as described in Materials and Methods. Cocultures of Th1 or
Th2 cells with uninfected macrophages did not produce IFN-
or IL-4
levels above background (data not shown). In addition, infected
macrophages cultured in the absence of T cells did not produce IFN-
,
IL-4, or NO levels above background (Fig. 4A and B), and as many as 50 to 75% of these macrophages were found to contain intracellular AMA by
Giemsa staining. However, the supernatants of cocultures of
parasite-specific Th1 cells and infected macrophages contained high
levels of IFN-
(Fig. 4A) and NO (Fig. 4B). Associated with these
increases in IFN-
and NO production in Th1 cell cultures were 50%
reductions in the proportion of infected macrophages and 50%
reductions in the average number of intracellular AMA in each infected
cell, compared with control cultures incubated in the absence of T
cells (Fig. 4C). Cocultures of parasite-specific Th2 cells with
infected macrophages contained high levels of IL-4 (Fig. 4A),
confirming that these Th2 cells could recognize parasite antigens
expressed during infection. However, the Th2 cells did not induce
infected macrophages to produce NO (Fig. 4B), and only minimal
decreases in infection were detected microscopically compared with
control cultures without T cells (Fig. 4C). In addition to these
experiments analyzed microscopically after 48 h of incubation,
similar cocultures of T cells and infected macrophages were set up and
incubated at 37°C for more than 1 week. In the absence of T cells or
in the presence of Th2 cells that were associated with only minimal
inhibition of parasite infection at 48 h,
trypomastigotes were easily detected in the supernatants by 72 h (>8 × 105
trypomastigotes/ml). However,
trypomastigotes were not detected in the culture
supernatants, during the entire period of observation (greater than 1 week), from cultures of infected macrophages incubated with Th1 cells.
These data indicate that parasite-specific Th1 cells, but not Th2
cells, can mediate protection against intracellular T. cruzi infection.
|
T. cruzi-specific Th1 cells provide an essential
function but are not sufficient for the development of immunity
protective against primary infection in vivo.
To further
investigate a causal relationship between T. cruzi-specific
Th1 cells and protective immunity against T. cruzi, we
performed adoptive transfer experiments with SCID mice (Table 2). We found that subcutaneous injection
of 1,000 T. cruzi IMT was uniformly lethal to control SCID
mice. Adoptive transfer of 5 million total spleen cells from naive
BALB/c mice into SCID mice prior to challenge could reproducibly
protect these animals (79% survival). However, CD4-depleted spleen
cells from BALB/c mice were not protective after adoptive transfer to
SCID mice (9% survival only). In addition, adoptive transfer of
parasite-specific Th1 cells alone did not protect against T. cruzi challenge. These mice died despite the fact that we could
demonstrate expansion of the parasite-specific Th1 cells in these
animals by flow-cytometric and cytokine stimulation studies. Ten
to twenty percent of total spleen cells harvested 2 to 4 weeks
postinfection from SCID mice transferred with Th1 cells were
CD3+ CD4+ (
5 to 10 million
CD4+ T cells), and these spleen cells produced
50 ± 2 U of IFN-
/ml in response to in vitro stimulation with
parasite lysate. CD3+ CD4+ cells were not
detectable in spleen cell preparations harvested from untreated control
SCID mice 2 to 4 weeks postinfection, and these control SCID spleen
cells did not produce IFN-
in response to in vitro stimulation with
parasite lysate. Finally, we challenged SCID mice with T. cruzi after adoptive transfer of both our parasite-specific Th1
cells and CD4-depleted BALB/c spleen cells. We found that seven of nine
SCID mice reconstructed with adoptively transferred Th1 cells and
CD4-depleted BALB/c spleen cells were able to control their T. cruzi infection and survived for more than 3 months after the
challenge. Overall, these results demonstrate that CD4+ T
cells are necessary for the development of immunity protective against
primary T. cruzi infection but clearly indicate that Th1 cells alone are not sufficient for protection against even a low-level T. cruzi challenge. Our results also have demonstrated that
Th1 cells can provide the immune function(s) required from
CD4+ T cells for the development of immunity protective
against primary T. cruzi infection. In addition, these
results indicate that the failure to develop protective immunity in
SCID mice reconstructed with Th1 cells alone or CD4-depleted spleen
cells alone could not be explained by an inability of these cell
populations to provide their important immune effector functions in
vivo after adoptive transfer.
|
CD4+ T cells are not required for immune memory
effector function protective against T. cruzi
challenge.
The previous experiments demonstrated that
CD4+ T cells were necessary as helper and/or effector
immune cells for the control of primary T. cruzi infection.
We next studied in the SCID mouse adoptive-transfer model whether
CD4+ T lymphocytes were required for memory immune control
of more aggressive secondary challenges with T. cruzi. Shown
in Table 3 are the overall
mortality results for three cumulative experiments comparing the
protective effects of naive and memory immune spleen cell populations.
CD4-depleted memory immune cells provided significant levels of
protection, which were similar to those provided by total memory immune
cells. These results indicate that CD4+ T cells were not
necessary for memory immune effector functions protective in this
adoptive-transfer SCID mouse model. Our combined results presented in
this report suggest that although CD4+ Th1 cells can
mediate effector inhibition of intracellular T. cruzi inside
macrophages, a more important function relevant for vaccine development
may be the ability of CD4+ Th1 cells to provide helper
activity for the development of other effector functions.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous investigations have documented important roles for
CD4+ T lymphocytes and IFN-
responses in T. cruzi protective immunity (4, 20, 32-34, 46). In
addition, CD4+ Th1 cells have been shown to adoptively
transfer protective T. cruzi immunity into resistant C57BL/6
mice (23, 28, 29). However, previous studies have not
clearly defined the relative importance of CD4+ Th1
and Th2 cells for T. cruzi systemic immunity.
The ability of highly purified parasite-specific Th1 cells to protect relatively resistant C57BL/6 mice demonstrates that this immune subset is involved in natural T. cruzi systemic resistance. Of potentially greater significance, we have shown that the induction of predominant Th1 immunity can protect a highly susceptible murine strain against T. cruzi challenge. The induction of T. cruzi-specific Th1 cell responses, and not Th2 responses, in susceptible BALB/c mice was associated with lower-level parasitemias and nearly universal survival after virulent parasite challenges (Table 1 and Fig. 2). These data indicate that a T. cruzi vaccine strategy capable of biasing for Th1 immunity may be useful in populations with variable levels of natural resistance and susceptibility. The ability to induce protective immune responses in heterogeneous outbred populations, including highly susceptible individuals, will be an important requirement for any human vaccine strategy.
To more specifically address the importance, in susceptible mice, of differential CD4+ T-cell responses for T. cruzi systemic immunity, we generated highly polarized Th1 and Th2 cell lines reactive with parasite antigens from BALB/c lymphocytes. We studied the ability of these Th1 and Th2 cell lines to inhibit intracellular T. cruzi replication in vitro (Fig. 4) and to protect SCID mice against T. cruzi challenge in vivo (Table 2). Th1, but not Th2, cells induced NO production and inhibited T. cruzi intracellular replication in infected macrophages. Despite their ability to prevent intracellular parasite replication in vitro, these Th1 cells were not protective when transferred alone into SCID mice. However, when transferred with naive CD4-depleted spleen cell populations into SCID mice, these same Th1 cells were shown to provide an essential immune function required for the development of natural primary immunity protective against T. cruzi infection. Therefore, CD4+ Th1 cells appear to be necessary but not sufficient for the initial control of T. cruzi infection in mice. These results suggested to us that CD4+ Th1 cells perform a critical helper function for the development of initial adaptive immune responses protective against T. cruzi.
To explore the possibility that Th1 cells are required as effector cells for T. cruzi immunity in vivo, we conducted adoptive-transfer experiments reconstituting SCID mice with spleen cells from memory-immune BALB/c mice (Table 3). The spleen cell donors had survived challenge multiple times with virulent T. cruzi BFT and were found to develop potent Th1 cell responses early after parasite rechallenge (data not shown). We found that similar levels of protection were transferred by memory immune cells depleted of essentially all CD4+ T cells and by total memory immune cells. Therefore, CD4+ Th1 cells were not required for the secondary effector functions protective against T. cruzi in this SCID mouse adoptive-transfer model. Combined with the results shown in Table 2, these data indicate that helper functions associated with Th1 cells may be more important for T. cruzi immunity than direct effector functions mediated by these cells.
T. cruzi infects many different types of nucleated mammalian cells, including nonhematopoietic cells that do not normally express surface MHC class II molecules. Recognition and destruction of infected cells not expressing MHC class II probably require CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), which respond to parasite peptides presented by MHC class I molecules. Previous investigations have demonstrated that CTL are important for T. cruzi protective immunity in mice (30, 33, 34, 44, 45). The cytoplasmic location of T. cruzi replication may bias for antigen presentation through the endogenous processing pathway, making CTL even more important for the recognition and destruction of T. cruzi-infected cells. Our results demonstrating that CD4+ Th1 lymphocytes provide an essential immune function necessary for primary but not memory T. cruzi immunity could be explained by a role for Th1 cells in the optimal induction of protective CTL responses. Other studies of a wide variety of antigenic systems have indicated that CD4+ T lymphocytes can provide important helper functions for the generation of effective CTL (2, 5, 6, 10, 12, 22, 25, 37, 41, 50, 51).
CD4+ Th1 cells could provide an important helper function for the development of protective humoral immune responses. Generally, humoral immune mechanisms are important for the control of extracellular pathogens. Extracellular life stages of T. cruzi infect mucosal surfaces and circulate in the blood and lymph during acute systemic infection, and therefore humoral immunity may be required for optimal protection against T. cruzi infection. Passive transfer of immune serum has been shown to protect against aggressive intraperitoneal challenges with large doses of extracellular BFT (17). However, natural transmission of T. cruzi through infected reduviid excreta or even from contaminated blood transfusions does not involve large numbers of extracellular parasites introduced directly into the systemic circulation. In addition, all BFT must mature intracellularly, such that immunity capable of targeting T. cruzi-infected cells should be sufficient to protect against this parasite. Previous investigators demonstrated that vaccine-induced immunity protective against T. cruzi could be adoptively transferred with B-cell-depleted lymphocyte populations (24). We also have found that the adoptive transfer of B-cell-depleted spleen cells from naive BALB/c mice can protect SCID mice against primary T. cruzi systemic challenge (data not shown). Further studies are required to determine whether or not mucosal antibody responses (e.g., secretory immunoglobulin A) could be important for the prevention of initial T. cruzi mucosal infection.
In summary, we have shown that the induction of predominant Th1
immunity can be protective against systemic T. cruzi
infection, even in highly susceptible mice. Future investigations will
need to determine the effector immune mechanisms critical for the
protective immunity induced by our Th1 immunization protocol.
Immunocompetent mice can generate multiple subsets of CD4+
T lymphocytes, CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD4
CD8

TCR+ T cells,

TCR+ T cells, and B cells, any of which may be
involved in a Th1-biased immune response. Regardless of which immune
subsets are the final effector cells that prevent parasite growth in
vivo, our results indicate that CD4+ Th1 responses are
involved in the development of protective T. cruzi systemic
immunity, and immunization strategies designed to bias for Th1
responses should be included in future vaccine trials.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant AI34912-03.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 577-8648. Fax: (314) 771-3816. E-mail: hoftdf{at}slu.edu.
Editor: J. M. Mansfield
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, and A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787-793[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Alter, B. J., D. J. Schendel, M. L. Bach, F. H. Bach, and J. H. Stimpfling. 1973. Cell-mediated lympholysis: importance of serologically defined H-2 regions. J. Exp. Med. 137:1303-1309[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Andrade, V., M. Barral-Netto, and S. G. Andrade. 1985. Patterns of resistance of inbred mice to Trypanosoma cruzi are determined by parasite strain. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 18:499-506[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Araujo, F.
1989.
Development of resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi in mice depends on a viable population of L3T4+ (CD4+) T lymphocytes.
Infect. Immun.
57:2246-2248 |
| 5. |
Cantor, H., and E. A. Boyse.
1975.
Functional subclasses of T lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. II. Cooperation between subclasses of Ly+ cells in the generation of killer activity.
J. Exp. Med.
141:1390-1399 |
| 6. | Cassell, D., and J. Forman. 1991. Two roles for CD4 cells in the control of the generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 146:3-10[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
Gazzinelli, R. T.,
I. P. Oswald,
S. Hieny,
S. L. James, and A. Sher.
1992.
The microbicidal activity of interferon- -treated macrophages against Trypanosoma cruzi involves an L-arginine-dependent, nitrogen oxide-mediated mechanism inhibitable by interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor- .
Eur. J. Immunol.
22:2501-2506[Medline].
|
| 8. | Green, L. C., D. A. Wagner, J. Glogowski, P. L. Skipper, J. S. Wishnok, and S. R. Tannenbaum. 1982. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 126:131-138[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Hoft, D. F., R. G. Lynch, and L. V. Kirchhoff. 1993. Kinetic analysis of antigen-specific immune responses in resistant and susceptible mice during infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Immunol. 151:7038-7047[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Husmann, L. A., and M. J. Bevan. 1988. Cooperation between helper T cells and cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 532:158-169[Medline]. |
| 11. | Karasuyama, H., and F. Melchers. 1988. Establishment of mouse cell lines which constitutively secrete large quantities of interleukin 2, 3, 4, or 5, using modified cDNA expression vectors. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:97-104[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Kast, W. M.,
A. M. Bronkhorst,
L. P. de Waal, and C. J. Melief.
1986.
Cooperation between cytotoxic and helper T lymphocytes in protection against lethal Sendai virus infection. Protection by T cells is MHC restricted and MHC regulated: a model for MHC-disease associations.
J. Exp. Med.
164:723-738 |
| 13. | Kierszenbaum, F. 1980. Protection of congenitally athymic mice against Trypanosoma cruzi infection by passive antibody transfer. J. Parasitol. 66:673-675[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Kierszenbaum, F., and J. G. Howard.
1976.
Mechanisms of resistance against experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection: the importance of antibodies and antibody-forming capacity in the Biozzi high and low responder mice.
J. Immunol.
116:1208-1211 |
| 15. | Kierszenbaum, F., M. F. Lima, and J. J. Wirth. 1985. Effects of antiserum to Trypanosoma cruzi on the uptake and rate of killing of vector-borne, metacyclic forms of the parasite by macrophages. Int. J. Parasitol. 15:409-413[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. | Kirchhoff, L. V., and D. F. Hoft. 1990. Immunization and challenge of mice with insect-derived metacyclic trypomastigotes of Trypanosoma cruzi. Parasite Immunol (Oxford) 12:65-74. |
| 17. | Krettli, A. U., and Z. Brener. 1982. Resistance against Trypanosoma cruzi associated to anti-living trypomastigote antibodies. J. Immunol. 128:2009-2012[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Laranja, F. S.,
E. Dias,
G. Nobrega, and A. Miranda.
1956.
Chagas' disease a clinical, epidemiologic and pathologic study.
Circulation
14:1035-1060[Medline].
|
| 19. | Lima-Martins, M. V. C., G. A. Sanchez, A. U. Krettli, and Z. Brener. 1985. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity against Trypanosoma cruzi is only mediated by protective antibodies. Parasite Immunol. (Oxford) 7:367-376. |
| 20. |
McCabe, R.,
S. Meagher, and B. Mullins.
1991.
Gamma interferon suppresses acute and chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in cyclosporin-treated mice.
Infect Immun.
59:1633-1638 |
| 21. | McHardy, N. 1980. Passive protection of mice against infection with Trypanosoma cruzi with plasma: the use of blood- and vector bug-derived trypomastigote challenge. Parasitology 80:471-478[Medline]. |
| 22. | Melief, C. J., M. van der Meulen, B. J. Christiaans, and P. de Greeve. 1979. Cooperation between subclasses of T lymphocytes in the in vitro generation of cytotoxicity against a mutant H-2K difference: an analysis with anti-Lyt antisera. Eur. J. Immunol. 9:7-12[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Millar, A. E.,
M. Wleklinski-Lee, and S. J. Kahn.
1999.
The surface protein superfamily of Trypanosoma cruzi stimulates a polarized Th1 response that becomes anergic.
J. Immunol.
162:6092-6099 |
| 24. | Miller, M. J., R. A. Wrightsman, G. A. Stryker, and J. E. Manning. 1997. Protection of mice against Trypanosoma cruzi by immunization with paraflagellar rod proteins requires T cell, but not B cell, function. J. Immunol. 158:5330-5337[Abstract]. |
| 25. |
Mizuochi, T.,
H. Golding,
A. S. Rosenberg,
L. H. Glimcher,
T. R. Malek, and A. Singer.
1985.
Both L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ helper T cells initiate cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses against allogenic major histocompatibility antigens but not against trinitrophenyl-modified self.
J. Exp. Med.
162:427-443 |
| 26. | Murfin, D. J., L. Choromanski, and R. E. Kuhn. 1985. Production and characterization of clones of the Brazil strain of Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Parasitol. 7:525-529[CrossRef]. |
| 27. | Nabors, G. S., and R. L. Tarleton. 1991. Differential control of IFN-gamma and IL-2 production during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J. Immunol. 146:3591-3598[Abstract]. |
| 28. | Nickell, S. P., A. Gebremichael, R. Hoff, and M. H. Boyer. 1987. Isolation and functional characterization of murine T cell lines and clones specific for the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Immunol. 138:914-921[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Nickell, S. P.,
M. Keane, and M. So.
1993.
Further characterization of protective Trypanosoma cruzi-specific CD4+ T-cell clones: T helper type 1-like phenotype and reactivity with shed trypomastigote antigens.
Infect. Immun.
61:3250-3258 |
| 30. | Nickell, S. P., G. A. Stryker, and C. Arevalo. 1993. Isolation from Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice of CD8+, MHC-restricted cytotoxic T cells that lyse parasite-infected target cells. J. Immunol. 150:1446-1457[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Nogueira, N., J. Ellis, S. Chaplan, and Z. Cohn. 1981. Trypanosoma cruzi: in vivo and in vitro correlation between T-cell activation and susceptibility in inbred strains of mice. Exp. Parasitol. 51:325-334[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Reed, S. 1988. In vivo administration of recombinant IFN-gamma induces macrophage activation, and prevents acute disease, immune suppression, and death in experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infections. J. Immunol. 140:4342-4347[Abstract]. |
| 33. |
Rottenberg, M. E.,
M. Bakhiet,
T. Olsson,
K. Kristensson,
T. Mak,
H. Wigzell, and A. Örn.
1993.
Differential susceptibilities of mice genomically deleted of CD4 and CD8 to infections with Trypanosoma cruzi or Trypanosoma brucei.
Infect. Immun.
61:5129-5133 |
| 34. | Rottenberg, M. E., A. Riarte, L. Sporrong, J. Altcheh, P. Petray, A. M. Ruiz, H. Wigzell, and A. Orn. 1995. Outcome of infection with different strains of Trypanosoma cruzi in mice lacking CD4 and/or CD8. Immunol. Lett. 45:53-60[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Rowland, E. C., and R. E. Kuhn.
1978.
Suppression of cellular responses in mice during Trypanosoma cruzi infections.
Infect. Immun.
20:393-397 |
| 36. | Rowland, E. C., and D. M. Ritter. 1984. Corpus Christi strain-induced protection to Trypanosoma cruzi infection in C3H(He) mice: transfer of resistance to Brazil strain challenge with lymphocytes. J. Parasitol. 70:760-766[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Schendel, D. J., B. J. Alter, and F. H. Bach. 1973. The involvement of LD- and SD-region differences in MLC and CML: a three cell experiment. Transplant. Proc. 5:1651-1655[Medline]. |
| 38. | Scott, M. T. 1981. The nature of immunity against Trypanosoma cruzi in mice recovered from acute infection. Parasite Immunol. (Oxford) 3:209-218. |
| 39. | Scott, M. T., and L. Moyes. 1982. 35S-methionine labelled Trypanosoma cruzi blood trypomastigotes: opsonization by chronic infection serum facilitates killing in spleen and liver. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 48:754-757[Medline]. |
| 40. | Shikanai-Yasuda, M. A., M. H. Lopes, J. E. Tolezano, E. Umezawa, V. Amato Neto, A. C. Pereira Barreto, Y. Higaki, A. A. B. Moreira, G. Funayama, A. A. Barone, A. Duarte, V. Odone, G. C. Gerri, M. Sato, D. Possi, and M. Shiroma. 1990. Doenca de Chagas aguda: vias de transmissao, aspectos clinicos e resposta a tereapeutica especifica em casos diagnosticados em um centro urbano. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 32:16-27[Medline]. |
| 41. | Stuhler, G., and P. Walden. 1993. Collaboration of helper and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2279-2286[Medline]. |
| 42. | Takehara, H. A., A. Perini, M. H. Da Silva, and I. Mota. 1981. Trypanosoma cruzi: role of different antibody classes in protection against infection in the mouse. Exp. Parasitol. 52:137-146[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Tanowitz, H. B., N. Minato, R. LaLonde, and M. Wittner. 1981. Trypanosoma cruzi: correlation of resistance and susceptibility in infected mice with the in vivo primary antibody response to sheep red blood cells. Exp. Parasitol. 52:233-242[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Tarleton, R. L. 1990. Depletion of CD8+ T cells increases susceptibility and reverses vaccine-induced immunity in mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Immunol. 144:717-724[Abstract]. |
| 45. |
Tarleton, R. L.,
B. H. Koller,
A. Latour, and M. Postan.
1992.
Susceptibility of 2-microglobulin-deficient mice to Trypanosoma cruzi infection.
Nature
356:338-340[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46. | Torrico, F., H. Heremans, M. T. Ribera, E. Van Marck, A. Billiau, and Y. Carlier. 1991. Endogenous IFN-gamma is required for resistance to acute Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice. J. Immunol. 146:3626-3632[Abstract]. |
| 47. | Trischmann, T., H. Tanowitz, M. Wittner, and B. Bloom. 1978. Trypanosoma cruzi: role of the immune response in the natural resistance of inbred strains of mice. Exp. Parasitol. 45:160-168[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 48. | Trischmann, T. M. 1983. Non-antibody-mediated control of parasitemia in acute experimental Chagas' disease. J. Immunol. 130:1953-1957[Abstract]. |
| 49. | Trischmann, T. M. 1986. Early parasite proliferation and host resistance in inbred strains of mice. Exp. Parasitol. 62:194-201[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 50. |
von Boehmer, H., and W. Haas.
1979.
Distinct Ir genes for helper and killer cells in the cytotoxic response to H-Y antigen.
J. Exp. Med.
150:1134-1142 |
| 51. | Wagner, H., A. Starzinski-Powitz, K. Pfizenmaier, and M. Rollinghoff. 1976. T-T cell collaboration during in vivo response to antigens coded by the peripheral and central regions of the MHC. Nature 163:235-237. |
| 52. |
Wrightsman, R. A.,
S. Krassner, and J. Watson.
1982.
Genetic control of responses to Trypanosoma cruzi in mice: multiple genes influencing parasitemia and survival.
Infect. Immun.
36:637-644 |
| 53. |
Wrightsman, R. A.,
S. M. Krassner,
J. D. Watson, and J. E. Manning.
1984.
Role of the H2S haplotype in survival of mice after infection with Trypanosoma cruzi.
Infect. Immun.
44:351-354 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»