Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, November 2000, p. 6457-6460, Vol. 68, No. 11
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evidence for Vaccine Synergy between Borrelia
burgdorferi Decorin Binding Protein A and Outer Surface Protein A
in the Mouse Model of Lyme Borreliosis
Mark S.
Hanson,*
Nita
K.
Patel,
David R.
Cassatt, and
Nancy D.
Ulbrandt
MedImmune, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878
Received 14 April 2000/Returned for modification 12 June
2000/Accepted 24 August 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Mice immunized with either the predominantly vector-stage
lipoprotein outer surface protein A (OspA) or the in vivo-expressed lipoprotein decorin binding protein A (DbpA) are protected against Borrelia burgdorferi challenge. DbpA-OspA combinations
protected against 100-fold-higher challenge doses than did either
single-antigen vaccine and conferred significant protection against
heterologous B. burgdorferi, B. garinii, and
B. afzelii isolates, suggesting that there is synergy
between these two immunogens.
 |
TEXT |
Lyme disease (20), or
Lyme borreliosis, is a tick-borne illness of humans and domestic
animals caused by at least three antigenically diverse species of
spirochetes (Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. afzelii) classified collectively as
B. burgdorferi sensu lato. Recent clinical trials
showed that monovalent recombinant subunit vaccines composed
of the B. burgdorferi outer surface protein A (OspA)
lipoprotein were efficacious through two Lyme disease transmission
seasons (19, 21).
At the start of feeding, B. burgdorferi spirochetes in ticks
are highly vulnerable to OspA antibodies imbibed from immunized hosts
(9), but after adaptation to the mammalian host environment following natural or experimental inoculation, most spirochetes down-regulate OspA expression and become resistant to OspA antibodies (3, 5, 9, 14). Protection from tick-borne
transmission of B. burgdorferi appears to depend on OspA
immunization achieving a critical threshold level of circulating
antibodies prior to the tick bite (8).
The addition of mammalian-host-stage antigens may extend the duration,
or enhance the level, of protective efficacy of transmission-blocking OspA vaccines against tick-borne Lyme borreliosis. Decorin binding protein A (DbpA) is another B. burgdorferi surface-exposed
lipoprotein that has shown vaccine efficacy against experimental
infection in the mouse model (5, 10, 13, 14). B. burgdorferi continues to express DbpA, but not OspA, after dermal
inoculation and remains vulnerable to DbpA antibodies during the early
stages of local and disseminating infection in mice (5, 14);
additionally, DbpA is immunogenic during human Lyme disease
(6). OspC (25) and other antigens (1,
11) on mammalian-host-adapted B. burgdorferi also
represent potential targets for protective or disease-resolving antibodies. We compared the protective efficacies of DbpA and OspA,
singly and in combination, against dermal challenge of mice as a first
step in the evaluation of second-generation DbpA-OspA combination
vaccines for Lyme disease.
The recombinant fusion lipoproteins Lpp2:OspAN40 (OspAN40)
and Lpp2:DbpAN40(His)6 (DbpAN40)
were used as vaccine antigens and had been previously described
(5, 14). A detergent extract of Escherichia coli
membrane proteins (5) was used as a negative-control antigen preparation.
In one vaccine experiment, four groups of 20 female 7-week-old C3H/HeJ
mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were immunized by
intraperitoneal injection of 10 µg of DbpAN40, 10 µg of
OspAN40, 5 µg of DbpAN40 plus 5 µg of
OspAN40, or 2.5 µg of E. coli protein
extract with complete Freund's adjuvant and then, 4 weeks later, were
given a second immunization of protein in incomplete Freund's
adjuvant. At week 6, five of the mice in each immunization group were
challenged by subcutaneous injection, into the dorsolateral thorax, of
cloned B. burgdorferi N40 (2) from an
exponentially growing culture diluted with BSKII medium (14)
to give escalating doses of 103, 104,
105, or 106 spirochetes in 0.1-ml volumes.
Other experiments used vaccines prepared by adsorbing antigens to the
aluminum hydroxide adjuvant Alhydrogel (Superfos Biosector, Kvistgård,
Denmark). Mice were immunized by subcutaneous injection of 0.1 ml of
vaccine at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and challenged with spirochetes at week
10. A challenge dose of 104 was used for B. burgdorferi N40 and Sh-2-82; a dose of 105 was used
for B. garinii G25 and B. afzelii IPF. The median
infective doses for these isolates were determined to be approximately
3 × 102 for N40 (14), 6 × 102 for Sh-2-82 (14), 3 × 103
for G25, and 2 × 104 for IPF. Two weeks after
challenge, the mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation and
samples of the inoculation site skin, blood, ear, urinary bladder, and
both tibiotarsal joints were cultured in BSKII plus antibiotics to
detect spirochetal infection (14).
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used as previously described
(14) to determine the prechallenge DbpA and OspA
immunoglobulin G (IgG) endpoint titers of antisera from individual mice
and antisera pooled from mice within each immunization group. The
borreliacidal activity of the prechallenge antisera was
determined, in a microtiter plate format, as the dilution of antiserum
from each individual mouse giving 50% growth inhibition by a
[3H]adenine metabolic labeling method (15) or
as the dilution of pooled antiserum giving a >90% reduction in
spirochete numbers (14).
Antigen expression by the spirochetes was evaluated by a direct
immunofluorescence assay using combined DbpAN40- and
OspAB31 (14)-specific purified rabbit
polyclonal IgG antibodies conjugated with the fluorochromes Alexa 546 and Alexa 488, respectively, according to the manufacturer's
protocol (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, Oreg.).
Double-labeled slides were viewed at 1,000× magnification, using
a Nikon E600 epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Melville, N.Y.), and images were acquired with a Sony DKC-5000 digital photo camera (Sony Electronics, Inc., Park Ridge, N.J.).
DbpA and OspA in combination protect against higher
B. burgdorferi challenge doses than single-antigen
vaccines.
The possibility that dual immunity to both DbpA and
OspA could provide more effective protection than either single
antigen alone was addressed in two complementary ways. First, we
attempted to exceed the B. burgdorferi challenge dose at
which the single antigens provided protection, and second, we asked
whether DbpA-OspA combinations provided protection at a lower
vaccine dose that was ineffective for either single immunogen. Nearly
all mice immunized with 10 µg of either DbpAN40 or
OspAN40 were protected from challenge with
103 or 104 spirochetes (Table
1), as expected from our earlier
observations (14). At a challenge dose of 105 or
106 spirochetes, mice immunized with
DbpAN40 or OspAN40 alone were protected only partially or not at all. In contrast, all mice immunized with the combined
DbpAN40-OspAN40 vaccine (5 µg of each antigen) were protected against even the highest challenge dose. The
106 challenge inoculum is at least 3,000 times higher than
the median infectious dose for this B. burgdorferi strain
(14). At each challenge dose, all mice vaccinated with the
E. coli extract were infected, with at least three of the
five tissues tested being culture positive for B. burgdorferi. The antisera from all mice immunized with either
DbpAN40 or OspAN40, or the combination
of both proteins, inhibited the in vitro growth of B. burgdorferi N40, and antisera from E. coli-immunized
mice were not borreliacidal. The in vitro killing potency of the
antisera from DbpAN40-immunized mice was about 20-fold
lower than that of OspAN40, probably because DbpA
is expressed at much lower levels than OspA in vitro (5, 14). Interestingly, the potency of OspAN40
antisera was not significantly different from that of the combined
vaccine (P = 0.43, Student's two-tailed t
test) in this in vitro assay. Our observations clearly showed that the
in vitro and in vivo potencies of DbpAN40 and
OspAN40 antibodies were divergent and that surrogate in
vitro assays were inadequate to predict the relative effectiveness of
single-antigen and combined-antigen vaccines. The enhanced in vivo
activity of DbpAN40 antibodies is likely due to
prolonged or increased vulnerability of the spirochetes to
DbpAN40 antibodies (5, 14), the potentiating
effects of immune effector functions toward DbpAN40 but
not OspAN40 antibodies, or a combination of the two
effects.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Comparison of the immunogenicities and in vitro potencies
of antisera from mice vaccinated with DbpAN40 and
OspAN40, singly and in combination, and their
protective efficacies against challenge with escalating B. burgdorferi N40 doses
|
|
DbpA and OspA in combination are more effective than
single-antigen vaccines against heterologous B. burgdorferi
sensu lato isolates.
Next, mice were immunized with single-antigen
or DbpAN40-OspAN40 combination vaccines
formulated with Alhydrogel, an adjuvant approved for use in humans.
Antisera from mice immunized with either 1.0- or 10-µg doses
inhibited the in vitro growth of B. burgdorferi N40, and
again, DbpAN40 antiserum was less potent for killing in
vitro than antisera against OspAN40 or the
DbpAN40-OspAN40 combination vaccine
(Table 2). Mice were well protected
against challenge with a 104 dose of the homologous
B. burgdorferi N40 strain when immunized with the 10-µg
dose regimen of DbpAN40 (9 of 10),
OspAN40 (10 of 10), or the
DbpAN40-OspAN40
combination vaccine (10 of 10). However, the
DbpAN40-OspAN40 combination vaccine
also elicited significant protection (8 of 10) at the 1.0-µg dose, a
level at which the single-antigen vaccines were only partially
protective. Nearly identical results were also obtained with a 0.1-µg
dose and with adjuvant-free formulations of these antigens,
demonstrating the intrinsic immunogenicity of the recombinant
lipoproteins (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Comparison of the relative protective efficacies of
immunizations with DbpAN40 and OspAN40,
singly and in combination and at either of two doses, against challenge
with homologous and heterologous B. burgdorferi sensu
lato isolates
|
|
We next examined the relative efficacies of single-antigen and
combination vaccines formulated with Alhydrogel against heterologous
challenge with
B. burgdorferi sensu stricto Sh-2-82,
B. garinii G25, and
B. afzelii IPF, isolates that
express DbpA and OspA proteins
whose sequences are
substantially divergent (
12,
17,
18,
22) (Table
2) from
those of the DbpA
N40 and OspA
N40
immunogens.
The DbpA
N40-OspA
N40
combinations were more effective against all
these heterologous
challenges than single-antigen vaccines (Table
2). Only partial
protection (6 of 10) at the 10-µg dose was achieved
against the most
divergent isolate,
B. afzelii IPF, but this reached
significance (
P = 0.027).
In each vaccination experiment, we consistently observed that the
various formulations of the
DbpA
N40-OspA
N40 combination
(Freund's,
Alhydrogel, or adjuvant free) were more effective than
the same dose of
either single antigen. Since the single-antigen
and combined-antigen
vaccines were compared at doses of equivalent
total mass, the improved
effectiveness of the DbpA
N40-OspA
N40 combination was not merely due to an additive effect of the two
immunogens but rather provided evidence of vaccine synergy between
DbpA and OspA in this
model.
Heterogeneity of OspA and DbpA expression by B. burgdorferi may limit efficacy of single-antigen vaccines.
Cultures of cloned B. burgdorferi N40 and uncloned B. burgdorferi Sh-2-82 were found to be heterogeneous for DbpA
and OspA expression when double labeled and examined by direct
immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1).
One percent of B. burgdorferi N40 spirochetes appeared to
express little or no OspA, and 2 to 3% expressed little or no
DbpA. For B. burgdorferi Sh-2-82, the OspA and
DbpA variants represented approximately 9 and 11% of the
population, respectively. It is likely that phenotypic heterogeneity in
the inoculum contributed to the limited efficacy of the single-antigen
vaccines (Tables 1 and 2), particularly for B. burgdorferi
Sh-2-82. This phenotypic heterogeneity may be relevant to
tick-transmitted B. burgdorferi, since one recent study
reported that spirochetes in salivary glands of feeding ticks expressed
host-stage OspC predominantly but some still expressed OspA
(7).

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Detection of B. burgdorferi phenotypic
variants deficient in DbpA or OspA by direct immunofluorescence
assay. B. burgdorferi N40 and Sh-2-82 spirochetes from
standard cultures were fixed to microscope slides and double labeled
with a combination of two fluorochrome-conjugated IgGs, prepared
against DbpA and OspA. Staining of a representative microscopic
field for B. burgdorferi N40 (A to C) and for B. burgdorferi Sh-2-82 (D to F) is shown. Images were acquired
alternately with the green filter (A and D) (DbpA labeling), the
blue filter (B and E) (OspA labeling), or the triple-band-pass
filter (C and F) (DbpA and OspA labeling). Leftward-pointing
arrows indicate representative DbpA-deficient spirochetes, and
rightward-pointing arrows indicate representative OspA-deficient
spirochetes.
|
|
OspC is another in vivo-expressed
B. burgdorferi
antigen that has been evaluated with OspA as a combination vaccine.
In that
study (
4), the addition of OspC did not improve upon
the vaccine
efficacy of OspA alone, but it was also shown that OspC
immunization
was ineffective against challenge with this particular
B. burgdorferi strain (N40). The serological heterogeneity
of OspC (
23,
24)
complicates vaccine design, and thus far
only strain-specific
protection has been reported with this immunogen
(
16).
We have shown that a vaccine combining the predominantly vector-stage
OspA and the mammalian-host-stage DbpA is superior to
either antigen alone against experimental
B. burgdorferi challenge
of mice. The enhanced efficacy of the
DbpA
N40- OspA
N40 combination
was
not merely due to the additive mass of the two immunogens
but appeared
to be mediated, at least in part, by sustained vulnerability
of the
spirochetes to DbpA antibodies during early disseminating
infection
(
5,
14). We recog- nize that dermal injections
of cultured
spirochetes do not recapitulate the
B. burgdorferi inoculum
delivered by the natural route of infection, and tick
challenge studies
are ultimately required to validate Lyme disease
vaccine
candidates. The effectiveness of combined DbpA-OspA immunity
against experimental infection now provides the impetus for performing
studies, possibly of a more complicated nature, using the natural
route
of infection. Given the several possible mechanisms of complementary
interactions between DbpA and OspA immune responses,
DbpA-OspA
combinations may have a role as second-generation
Lyme disease
vaccines. Vaccinees receiving DbpA-OspA may also
benefit from
an anamnestic immune response to DbpA upon natural
infection that
is unlikely to occur with OspA
alone.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Alan Barbour, Stephen Barthold, and Russell
Johnson for providing Borrelia isolates. We thank Christine
Bachy and Christine Fazenbaker for technical assistance and Luis Branco for advice on fluorescence microscopy. We also thank Scott Koenig and
Syd Johnson for helpful discussions and for critical review of the
manuscript, and we are grateful to Donni Leach for assistance in its preparation.
 |
ADDENDUM |
While the manuscript was being reviewed, a paper by Hagman
et al. (13a) reporting that DbpA immunity was
ineffective at preventing tick-borne transmission of B. burgdorferi infection to mice was published. These authors suggest
that DbpA is a host stage antigen but is not a target for
protective antibodies, a theory that conflicts with our earlier reports
(5, 14). Differences in the potencies of the DbpA
immunogens used in the two studies may be a factor contributing to this
apparent discordance. Hagman et al. used a recombinant
cytosolically expressed form of DbpA, lacking
posttranslational modifications, that conferred only partial protection
against experimental B. burgdorferi challenge
(13) even with much higher vaccine doses (20 to 50 µg in
Freund's adjuvant) than those that were effective for our acylated and
secreted DbpA in the present study. We have found that
conformational epitopes contribute substantially to DbpA immunity
(N. D. Ulbrandt, N. K. Patel, and M. S. Hanson, unpublished data), as has been reported for other B. burgdorferi vaccine antigens (9a, 11a).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: MedImmune, Inc.,
35 W. Watkins Mill Rd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878. Phone: (301) 527-4264. Fax: (301) 527-4200. E-mail: hansonm{at}medimmune.com.
Editor:
R. N. Moore
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barthold, S. W.,
M. de Souza, and S. Feng.
1996.
Serum-mediated resolution of Lyme arthritis in mice.
Lab. Investig.
74:57-67[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barthold, S. W.,
M. S. de Souza,
J. L. Janotka,
A. L. Smith, and D. H. Persing.
1993.
Chronic Lyme borreliosis in the laboratory mouse.
Am. J. Pathol.
143:959-971[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Barthold, S. W.,
E. Fikrig,
L. K. Bockenstedt, and D. H. Persing.
1995.
Circumvention of outer surface protein A immunity by host-adapted Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
63:2255-2261[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bockenstedt, L. K.,
E. Hodzic,
S. Feng,
K. W. Bourrel,
A. de Silva,
R. R. Montgomery,
E. Fikrig,
J. D. Radolf, and S. W. Barthold.
1997.
Borrelia burgdorferi strain-specific Osp C-mediated immunity in mice.
Infect. Immun.
65:4661-4667[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Cassatt, D. R.,
N. K. Patel,
N. D. Ulbrandt, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
DbpA, but not OspA, is expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi during spirochetemia and is a target for protective antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
66:5379-5387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cinco, M.,
M. Ruscio, and F. Rapagna.
2000.
Evidence of Dbps (decorin binding proteins) among European strains of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and in the immune response of LB patient sera.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
183:111-114[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Coleman, J. L.,
J. A. Gebbia,
J. Piesman,
J. L. Degen,
T. H. Bugge, and J. L. Benach.
1997.
Plasminogen is required for efficient dissemination of B. burgdorferi in ticks and for enhancement of spirochetemia in mice.
Cell
89:1111-1119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
de Silva, A. M.,
N. S. Zeidner,
Y. Zhang,
M. C. Dolan,
J. Piesman, and E. Fikrig.
1999.
Influence of outer surface protein A antibody on Borrelia burgdorferi within feeding ticks.
Infect. Immun.
67:30-35[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
de Silva, A. M.,
S. R. Telford III,
L. R. Brunet,
S. W. Barthold, and E. Fikrig.
1996.
Borrelia burgdorferi OspA is an arthropod-specific transmission-blocking Lyme disease vaccine.
J. Exp. Med.
183:271-275[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9a.
|
Exner, M. M.,
X. Wu,
D. R. Blanco,
J. N. Miller, and M. R. Lovett.
2000.
Protection elicited by native outer membrane protein Oms66 (p66) against host-adapted Borrelia burgdorferi: conformational nature of bastericidal epitopes.
Infect. Immun.
68:2647-2654[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Feng, S.,
E. Hodzic,
B. Stevenson, and S. W. Barthold.
1998.
Humoral immunity to Borrelia burgdorferi N40 decorin binding proteins during infection of laboratory mice.
Infect. Immun.
66:2827-2835[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Fikrig, E.,
S. W. Barthold,
W. Sun,
W. Feng,
S. R. Telford III, and R. A. Flavell.
1997.
Borrelia burgdorferi P35 and P37 proteins, expressed in vivo, elicit protective immunity.
Immunity
6:531-539[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11a.
|
Gilmore, R. D., Jr., and M. L. Mbow.
1999.
Conformational nature of the Borrelia burgdorferi B31 outer surface protein C protective epitope.
In
Infect. Immun. 67:5463-5469.
|
| 12.
|
Godfroid, E.,
A. Ben Messaoud,
A. Poliszczak,
Y. Lobet, and A. Bollen.
1995.
Assignment of Borrelia burgdorferi strains G25 and VS461 to the Borrelia garinii, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Borrelia afzelii genospecies, respectively: a comparison of OspA protein sequences.
DNA Sequence
54:251-254.
|
| 13.
|
Hagman, K. E.,
P. Lahdenne,
T. G. Popova,
S. F. Porcella,
D. R. Akins,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1998.
Decorin-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi is encoded within a two-gene operon and is protective in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2674-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13a.
|
Hagman, K. E.,
X. Yang,
S. K. Wikel,
G. B. Schoeler,
M. J. Caimano,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
2000.
Decorin-binding protein A (DbpA) of Borrelia burgdorferi is not protective when immunized mice are challenged via tick infestation and correlates with the lack of DbpA expression by B. burgdorferi in ticks.
Infect. Immun.
68:4759-4764[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Hanson, M. S.,
D. R. Cassatt,
B. P. Guo,
N. K. Patel,
M. P. McCarthy,
D. W. Dorward, and M. Höök.
1998.
Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection.
Infect. Immun.
66:2143-2153[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Pavia, C. S.,
V. Kissel,
S. Bittker,
F. Cabello, and S. Levine.
1991.
Antiborrelial activity of serum from rats injected with the Lyme disease spirochete.
J. Infect. Dis.
163:656-659[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Probert, W. S.,
M. Crawford,
R. B. Cadiz, and R. B. LeFebvre.
1997.
Immunization with outer surface protein (Osp) A, but not OspC, provides cross-protection of mice challenged with North American isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Infect. Dis.
175:400-405[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Roberts, W. C.,
B. A. Mullikin,
R. Lathigra, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
Molecular analysis of sequence heterogeneity among genes encoding decorin binding proteins A and B of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato.
Infect. Immun.
66:5275-5285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Rosa, P. A.,
T. G. Schwan, and D. Hogan.
1992.
Recombination between genes encoding major outer surface proteins A and B of Borrelia burgdorferi.
Mol. Microbiol.
6:3031-3040[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Sigal, L. H.,
J. M. Zahradnik,
P. Lavin,
S. J. Patella,
G. Bryant,
R. Haselby,
E. Hilton,
M. Kunkel,
D. Adler-Klein,
T. Doherty,
J. Evans,
S. E. Malawista, and The Recombinant Outer-Surface Protein A Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Consortium.
1998.
A vaccine consisting of recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface protein A to prevent Lyme disease.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:216-222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Steere, A. C.
1994.
Lyme disease: a growing threat to urban populations.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2378-2383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Steere, A. C.,
V. K. Sikand,
F. Meurice,
D. L. Parenti,
E. Fikrig,
R. T. Schoen,
J. Nowakowski,
C. H. Schmid,
S. Laukamp,
C. Buscarino,
D. Krause, and The Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Group.
1998.
Vaccination against Lyme disease with recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A with adjuvant.
N. Engl. J. Med.
339:209-215[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Will, G.,
S. Jauris-Heipke,
E. Schwab,
U. Busch,
D. Rössler,
E. Soutschek,
B. Wilske, and V. Preac-Mursic.
1995.
Sequence analysis of ospA genes shows homogeneity within Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto and Borrelia afzelii strains but reveals major subgroups within the Borrelia garinii species.
Med. Microbiol. Immunol.
184:73-80[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Wilske, B.,
U. Busch,
V. Fingerle,
S. Jauris-Heipke,
V. Preac-Mursic,
D. Rössler, and G. Will.
1996.
Immunological and molecular variability of OspA and OspC. Implications for Borrelia vaccine development.
Infection
24:208-212[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Wilske, B.,
S. Jauris-Heipke,
R. Lobentanzer,
I. Pradel,
V. Preac-Mursic,
D. Rössler,
E. Soutschek, and R. C. Johnson.
1995.
Phenotypic analysis of outer surface protein C (OspC) of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by monoclonal antibodies: relationship to genospecies and OspA serotype.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:103-109[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Zhong, W.,
T. Stehle,
C. Museteanu,
A. Seibers,
L. Gern,
M. D. Kramer,
R. Wallich, and M. M. Simon.
1997.
Therapeutic passive vaccination against chronic Lyme disease in mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12533-12538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, November 2000, p. 6457-6460, Vol. 68, No. 11
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Barthold, S. W., Hodzic, E., Tunev, S., Feng, S.
(2006). Antibody-mediated disease remission in the mouse model of lyme borreliosis.. Infect. Immun.
74: 4817-4825
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, J. H., Singvall, J., Schwarz-Linek, U., Johnson, B. J. B., Potts, J. R., Hook, M.
(2004). BBK32, a Fibronectin Binding MSCRAMM from Borrelia burgdorferi, Contains a Disordered Region That Undergoes a Conformational Change on Ligand Binding. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 41706-41714
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Willett, T. A., Meyer, A. L., Brown, E. L., Huber, B. T.
(2004). An effective second-generation outer surface protein A-derived Lyme vaccine that eliminates a potentially autoreactive T cell epitope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 1303-1308
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feng, S., Hodzic, E., Freet, K., Barthold, S. W.
(2003). Immunogenicity of Borrelia burgdorferi Arthritis-Related Protein. Infect. Immun.
71: 7211-7214
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liang, F. T., Nelson, F. K., Fikrig, E.
(2002). Molecular Adaptation of Borrelia burgdorferi in the Murine Host. JEM
196: 275-280
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Heikkila, T., Seppala, I., Saxen, H., Panelius, J., Yrjanainen, H., Lahdenne, P.
(2002). Species-Specific Serodiagnosis of Lyme Arthritis and Neuroborreliosis Due to Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto, B. afzelii, and B. garinii by Using Decorin Binding Protein A. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 453-460
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ulbrandt, N. D., Cassatt, D. R., Patel, N. K., Roberts, W. C., Bachy, C. M., Fazenbaker, C. A., Hanson, M. S.
(2001). Conformational Nature of the Borrelia burgdorferi Decorin Binding Protein A Epitopes That Elicit Protective Antibodies. Infect. Immun.
69: 4799-4807
[Abstract]
[Full Text]