Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6587-6594, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Protective and Nonprotective Epitopes from Amino
Termini of M Proteins from Australian Aboriginal Isolates and Reference
Strains of Group A Streptococci
Evelyn R.
Brandt,
Terrence
Teh,
Wendy A.
Relf,
Rhonda I.
Hobb, and
Michael F.
Good*
Cooperative Research Centre for Vaccine
Technology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, and the
Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition,
University of Queensland, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland
4029, Australia
Received 27 June 2000/Returned for modification 9 August
2000/Accepted 1 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The M protein is the primary vaccine candidate to prevent group A
streptococcal (GAS) infection and the subsequent development of
rheumatic fever (RF). However, the large number of serotypes have made
it difficult to design a vaccine against all strains. We have taken an
approach of identifying amino-terminal M protein epitopes from GAS
isolates that are highly prevalent in GAS-endemic populations within
the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia. Australian Aboriginals in the
NT experience the highest incidence of RF worldwide. To develop a
vaccine for this population, 39 peptides were synthesized, representing
the amino-terminal region of the M protein from endemic GAS. Mice
immunized with these peptides covalently linked to tetanus toxoid and
emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant raised high-titer antibodies.
Over half of these sera reduced bacterial colony counts by >80%
against the homologous isolate of GAS. Seven of the peptide antisera
also cross-reacted with at least three other heterologous peptides by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antiserum to one peptide,
BSA101-28, could recognize six other peptides, and five of
these peptides could inhibit opsonization mediated by
BSA101-28 antiserum. Cross-opsonization studies showed that six of these sera could opsonize at least one heterologous isolate
of GAS. These data reveal vaccine candidates specific to a GAS-endemic
area and show the potential of some to cross-opsonize multiple isolates
of GAS. This information will be critical when considering which
epitopes may be useful in a multiepitope vaccine to prevent GAS infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Group A streptococci (GAS) are a
major human pathogen responsible for suppurative and nonsuppurative
pathology. The former group of conditions range from pharyngitis to the
far more serious toxic shock-like syndrome and necrotizing fasciitis,
whereas the latter include poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis and
rheumatic fever (RF). RF and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) are
responsible for 25 to 50% of cardiac conditions in children in
developing countries (23). Australia's Aboriginal
population experiences the highest rate of RF and RHD in the world.
Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory of Australia have RF
incidence rates as high as 650 per 100,000, and the prevalence of RHD
approaches 30 per 1,000 in some communities, compared to only 0.14 per
1,000 non-Aboriginals living in the same region (6). The
median age for acquiring RF among Aboriginals is 11 years, and the life
expectancy of Aboriginals who die of the disease is less than 35 years.
Since RF and RHD only follow an infection with GAS, a strategy to
prevent these conditions is to prevent GAS infections. The current
approach of administering penicillin by injection has had limited
success, as compliance with this regimen is low (approximately 50%),
resulting in many recurrences in developing countries (6,
23). The best prospects for controlling RF rest with developing a
vaccine to prevent streptococcal infection.
Immunity to GAS is mediated by antibodies to the M protein, which
exists as a coiled-coil protein on the surface of the bacteria. The
amino acid sequence of the amino terminus of the M protein is
responsible for the serotype of the organism, with at least 80 distinct
serotypes having been defined (19). Antibodies directed to
the M protein opsonize streptococci in the presence of neutrophils; however, these antibodies are serotype specific and generally only
opsonize the homologous GAS isolate (1, 2, 10, 13, 14, 21).
Potential problems exist when immunizing with subunits of the M
protein, as accumulating evidence suggests that RF is likely to be an
autoimmune disease, although the pathogenesis is not clear. It may be
that an immune response directed to GAS proteins can also react with
host tissues, including the heart (12, 16, 17, 24, 29).
Therefore, care must he taken when designing vaccines for GAS. The
safest approach is to use sequences which do not evoke host
cross-reactive antibody or T-cell responses. Previous studies have
focused on defining opsonic epitopes from the amino-terminal region,
and most of these epitopes do not evoke cross-reactive antibody to
human host tissues (1, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14).
Epidemiological studies of endemic GAS isolates suggest that some
serotypes are much more common than others within a population, and
these vary between distinct geographic locations (15, 22, 25, 27,
28, 30). Although amino-terminal M protein epitopes from common
reference strains of GAS have been identified, protective epitopes from
GAS strains prevalent within a GAS-endemic region have yet to be
investigated. In the current study, we synthesized peptides to the
amino-terminal region of the M protein from GAS isolated from Northern
Territory Aboriginal communities. We show that mice immunized with
these peptides covalently linked to tetanus toxoid (TT) and emulsified
in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) raise high-titer antibodies to the
immunizing peptide. We define numerous opsonic epitopes from the M
proteins of endemic GAS isolates and determine the degree to which
these induce antibodies that cross-opsonize heterologous GAS strains.
This study lays the foundation for rationally designing a polyvalent
immunogen which will prevent GAS infection in targeted communities.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Syntheses of peptides and conjugation to TT.
Synthetic
peptides were produced as described and were purified by high-pressure
liquid chromatography (18). All peptides were conjugated via
the C-terminal cysteine residue to TT using 6'-maleimido-caproyl
n-hydroxy succinimide (MCS) coupling (7). Peptide
sequences are given in Table 1.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
List of synthetic peptides, corresponding GAS isolates, M
and ST type, OF, and murine serum antibody titer to immunizing
peptidea
|
|
Immunization of animals.
Peptides were administered
subcutaneously at the tail base to B10.BR (H-2k)
mice (Animal Resources Centre WA). Each of three mice received 30 µg
of peptide emulsified in CFA (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) in a
total volume of 50 µl. Mice were boosted after 21 days with 30 µg
of peptide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and two subsequent
booster injections were given at 10-day intervals. Mice were bled via
the tail artery at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks following primary immunization.
If, after three booster injections, individual mice had titers of
<12,800, mice were boosted with a further 30 µg of peptide in PBS
prior to using sera in the bactericidal assay.
Detection of antibodies.
An enzyme-linked
immunosorbent-assay (ELISA) was used to measure murine serum antibodies
to the peptides as described (17, 26). Titer is defined as
the lowest dilution that gave an optical density (OD) reading of more
than 3 standard deviations above the mean OD of the control wells
containing normal mouse serum. Western blot analysis of antipeptide
cross-reactivity against cardiac myosin (Sigma), tropomyosin (Sigma),
keratin (Sigma), and murine whole heart extract (26) was
performed as described (26).
GAS reference strains and isolates.
GAS isolates and
reference strains were obtained from the Menzies School of Health
Research, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, and Diana Martin,
Institute of Environmental Science and Research, Wellington, New
Zealand. Details for each strain are given in Table 1. Full
designations of reference strains are as follows (reference name in
parentheses): 2032 (M2B), 2033 (B930/24 PHLS), 2034 (SS241), 2035 (T5/B/PS PHLS), 2036 (S43/75/8/W14), 2040 (R53/1077 PHLS), 2041 (SS31),
2045 (PHL J17C), 2054 (D24/46 PHLS), 2069 (B737/71/1), 2072 (10870),
2075 (Trinidad A-75), 2077 (3890-V-Ramkisson), 2080 (D335 Lfd), 2317 (R75/268), and 2551 (68/3116). Isolates from the Northern Territory
were derived from blood culture or skin swabs from Aboriginal patients.
All isolates were subjected to serotyping (M, T, and opacity factor
[OF]) using standard methods (Table 1) (27, 28).
Bactericidal assay.
Murine antipeptide sera were assayed for
their ability to opsonize GAS essentially as described (21).
Briefly, the bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in 5 ml of
Todd-Hewitt broth (THB), and then 200 µl of overnight culture was
subinoculated into 5 ml of warm (37°C) THB and allowed to grow for
2 h at 37°C. GAS were then serially diluted to 10
4
in saline. Fifty microliters of the bacteria dilution was mixed with 50 µl of fresh heat-inactivated serum and 400 µl of nonopsonic heparinized donor blood, as a source of neutrophil and complement. All
donor blood was screened prior to assay to ensure that it could support
the growth of the GAS strain to at least 32 times the inoculum level in
a 3-h incubation at 37°C (4, 5). The mixture was incubated
end over end at 37°C for 3 h, 50 µl from each tube was plated
out, in duplicate, on THB blood agar pour plates and incubated
overnight, and the number of colonies on each plate was counted.
Opsonic activity of the antipeptide sera (percent kill) was calculated
as [(1
mean CFU in the presence of antipeptide sera)/(mean CFU in
the presence of normal mouse sera)] × 100. Peptide inhibition
opsonization assays were performed as described (4, 5) using
log-phase bacteria.
 |
RESULTS |
Synthetic peptides from the N terminus of M proteins of endemic
GAS.
The amino-terminal peptide sequences and sub-amino-terminal
peptide sequences from the A, B, and C repeat regions (not containing the amino terminus of the protein) were derived from DNA sequence analysis of streptococcal reference strains and clinical isolates collected from the Northern Territory of Australia and New Zealand (15, 27, 28). Table 1 shows the amino acid sequence of each
of the 39 synthetic peptide sequences with their corresponding GAS
strain, M type, and OF type. Amino-terminal peptide sequences were
derived from sequence typing (ST), a PCR-based sequencing method, of M
proteins and M-like (ML) proteins (highly homologous to M protein) of
reference strains and Australian and New Zealand GAS isolates (27,
28). Based on dendogram analysis, sequences have been grouped
into five ML protein families according to their nucleotide and protein
sequence relatedness; ML2, ML60, M5, TIN, M52/53/80, an M12/55-related
sequence group, and an unrelated sequence group (Table 1)
(27). Within each ML family, sub-amino-terminal sequences
have higher homology between family isolates than amino-terminal sequences (Table 2). Therefore, we also
synthesized six sub-amino-terminal peptides to determine whether
opsonic epitopes exist within these common domains.
Definition of opsonic amino-terminal epitopes.
Mice (three per
group) were immunized with the peptide-TT conjugates listed in Table 1.
An ELISA was used to detect the level of antibody in the pooled murine
sera to the homologous peptide (unconjugated) on the plate. Pooled
murine sera had high-titer antibodies (>3,200) against homologous
peptides following one primary immunization and three boosts (Materials
and Methods) (Table 1). In all cases, immunoglobulin G2b (IgG2b) was
the predominant antibody isotype produced. As negative controls, sera
from mice immunized with PBS or TT emulsified in CFA were tested by
ELISA against each of the peptides. There was no significant
recognition (titer of <100) by these sera of any of the amino-terminal
peptides listed in Table 1.
Each of the pooled antipeptide sera with a titer greater than >12,800
to the immunizing peptide was examined by Western blot
to determine
whether the antibodies cross-reacted with cardiac
myosin, tropomyosin,
keratin, or whole murine heart extract. None
of the sera investigated
recognized any of the proteins investigated
(data not
shown).
Sera with high-titer antibodies raised to each of the peptides were
then tested for their ability to opsonize the representative
GAS
reference strains and endemic isolates (listed in Table
1)
in an in
vitro bactericidal assay (Fig.
1). For
the 33 individual
amino-terminal peptides, 19 (58%) peptide-specific
antisera demonstrated
greater than 80% mean reduction in colony counts
against the homologous
GAS isolate. An opsonic activity of 60 to 80%
was observed with
four (12%) peptide antisera; two (6%) had between
40 and 60% opsonic
activity; and eight (24%) had less than 40%
opsonic activity against
the homologous GAS isolate. Antisera to all
six sub-N-terminal
peptides were also tested for their ability to
opsonize the corresponding
GAS isolate: four antisera
(Y504S
45-64, 88/25
33-53,
2040
50-69, and 2040
239-258) had an opsonic
activity
of between 40 and 60%, and two peptide antisera
(2032
42-59 and 2034
40-49) had
no opsonic activity at all against the
homologous GAS isolate (Fig.
1).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Opsonization of GAS by antisera to amino-terminal
peptides derived from the M protein of reference and clinical isolates.
Peptide antisera are grouped by their sequence type into M families.
Results are given as the mean percent kill (of at least two separate
experiments) against the homologous GAS isolate. UR, unrelated
sequences.
|
|
Epitope specificity.
To determine the specificity of the
murine amino-terminal and sub-amino-terminal peptide antisera, pooled
antipeptide sera with a titer of >12,800 to the immunizing peptide
were tested in an ELISA for binding to homologous and heterologous
peptides. The majority of the antisera bound only the homologous
peptide. However, seven antisera to amino-terminal and
sub-amino-terminal peptides, BSA101-28,
20321-19, 20341-19,
203440-69, Y504S45-60,
204050-69, and 88/301-20, cross-reacted (defined as a titer of
1,600) with at least three other heterologous peptides in an ELISA (Fig. 2). Antisera
to BSA101-28 and 20321-19 cross-reacted with
six and four heterologous peptides, respectively (Fig. 2). Peptide
antisera to 203246-59, NS141-19, NS11-19, 90/951-20, 88/5441-20,
20401-12, and 20331-19 cross-reacted with at
least one other heterologous peptide (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Antibody and bactericidal cross-reactivity of murine
antisera to amino-terminal peptides. Columns represent mean percent
reduction in CFU from at least two separate experiments (left vertical
axis). Symbols represent mean antibody titer from pooled murine sera to
amino-terminal peptides (right vertical axis). (A) GAS isolate BSA10,
peptide BSA101-28 (peptide on ELISA plate). (B) 2032 GAS,
peptide 20321-19. (C) 2034 GAS, peptides
20341-19 and 203440-69. (D) Y530S GAS,
peptide Y530S1-20. (E) 2040 GAS, peptide
204050-59. (F) 88/30 GAS, peptide 88/301-20.
(G) Y504S GAS, peptide Y504S1-20.
|
|
The epitope specificity of antisera to BSA10
1-28 and
2032
1-19 was further evaluated by comparing the ability of
cross-reactive and non-cross-reactive peptides to inhibit opsonization
against GAS isolates BSA10 and 2032, respectively. Antisera to
BSA10
1-28 and 2032
1-19 showed bactericidal
activity
against their respective GAS isolates. Peptides
BSA10
1-28,
2032
1-19, 2034
1-19,
88/30
1-20, and Y504S
1-20,
which cross-react
to BSA10
1-28 antisera by ELISA, were added
to
BSA10
1-28 antiserum prior to addition of nonopsonic donor
blood and BSA10 GAS. Bactericidal activity of the BSA10 antiserum
was inhibited significantly by peptides BSA10
1-28,
2032
1-19,
88/30
1-20, and
Y504S
1-20 by between and 78 and 84%
and by 43% for
peptide 2034
1-19 (Table
3).
Antiserum to
peptide 2032
1-19 also shows ELISA
cross-reactivity to peptides
BSA10
1-28,
2032
1-19, 2034
1-19, 88/30
1-19,
and Y504S
1-20 but not peptide Y530S
1-20.
Following
addition of these peptides to 2032
1-19 antiserum
in a peptide
inhibition opsonization assay against GAS strain 2032, all
cross-reactive
peptides could inhibit bactericidal activity, whereas in
the presence
of the non-cross-reactive peptide Y530S
1-20,
the 2032
1-19 antiserum could still significantly opsonize
2032 GAS (Table
3).
Bactericidal cross-reactivity of the amino-terminal peptide
antisera.
We have shown that antiserum raised to ML2 family
peptide BSA101-28 reacted with itself and six other
heterologous peptides, and antisera raised to three of the six peptides
that cross-react with BSA101-28 antiserum
(20321-19, 20341-19, and
204050-69) also recognized peptide BSA101-28. To determine whether these antisera could also cross-opsonize the
representative heterologous GAS isolates, opsonization assays were performed using antisera to peptides BSA101-28,
20321-19, 20341-19,
203440-69, Y530S1-20, 204050-69, 88/301-20, and Y504S1-20 against the
homologous (amino-terminal representative GAS) and heterologous
isolates represented by the peptides listed above.
Antisera to both BSA10
1-28 and 2032
1-19 could
clearly opsonize both corresponding ML2 family GAS isolates (Fig.
2A
and B). This result is not surprising, as the peptide sequence
of
2032
1-19 has 90% sequence homology to
BSA10
1-28 (Table
4). The
only other isolate that was repeatedly opsonized
by
BSA10
1-28 antiserum was Y504S (Fig.
2G). Interestingly,
antiserum to peptide Y504S
1-20 could opsonize isolate
BSA10
even though the cross-reactive ELISA titer to peptide
BSA10
1-28 was only 100 (Fig.
2A), suggesting that other
cross-reactive epitopes
may exist on BSA10. In addition, antiserum to
2040
50-69 also cross-opsonized GAS isolate BSA10 (Fig.
2A).
Although antiserum to 2040
50-69 was only moderately
opsonic (40%) against the representative isolate, 2040, it was able
to
cross-opsonize three other isolates, BSA10 (89.3%), 2034 (96.8%),
and
88/30 (70%) (Fig.
2 A, C, and F, respectively), which correlated
to
ELISA cross-reactivity. Antiserum to 88/30
1-20 could
also
cross-opsonize two other isolates, 2034 (97.1%), which correlated
with
ELISA cross-reactivity, and Y530S (97.4%), which did not
correlate
with ELISA cross-reactivity (Fig.
2C and D, respectively).
Similarly,
antiserum to peptide Y530S
1-20 reduced mean colony
counts
of two nonhomologous isolates of GAS, Y504S (79.2%) and
2034 (80%)
(Fig.
2C and G, respectively), even though no ELISA
cross-reaction was
previously observed. Antisera to peptides 2034
1-19 and
2034
40-59 only poorly cross-opsonized heterologous
isolates
of
GAS.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study is the first to take the approach of investigating and
defining opsonic epitopes from a specific region where GAS are endemic.
We have synthesized amino-terminal and sub-amino-terminal peptides from
M protein of clinical GAS isolates collected from Australian Aboriginal
communities and RF outbreaks in the Northern Territory and reference
strains. All 33 amino-terminal peptides and six sub-amino-terminal
peptides were highly immunogenic in mice when conjugated to TT, and
over half of the amino-terminus-specific antibodies were highly opsonic
to the homologous GAS strain. Antisera to the sub-amino-terminal
peptides did not significantly opsonize the homologous strains of GAS
(less than 50% kill). These findings are in agreement with previous
studies that show that antibodies to sub-amino-terminal domains
generally do not effectively opsonize GAS (1, 13).
We also identified several antipeptide sera that could opsonize not
only the homologous strain of GAS, but heterologous strains as well.
Although other studies have identified antipeptide sera that
cross-react with heterologous serotypes of M protein by ELISA, none of
these sera cross-opsonized the related heterologous GAS (1).
We were able to show that opsonization mediated by antisera to
BSA101-28 and 20321-19 (against BSA10 and
2032 GAS, respectively) could be inhibited by those peptides that were cross-reactive by ELISA. Antisera to BSA101-28 and
20321-19 could each directly opsonize two GAS isolates
represented by the ELISA-cross-reactive peptides. In addition, antisera
to peptides Y530S1-20, 204050-69,
88/301-20, and Y504S1-20 could opsonize at
least one nonhomologous isolate. In some cases where there was
cross-opsonization between strains, no ELISA cross-reactivity was
observed between amino-terminal peptide antisera and the nonhomologous amino-terminal peptide. It may be that other regions within the M
protein, or indeed other surface antigens of GAS, cross-react and are
opsonized by antibodies to these sequences.
With the exception of BSA101-28 and 20321-19,
which have 90% similarity and are both in the ML2 family, very little sequence homology between the other amino-terminal peptides existed (Table 4). Cross-opsonization by the peptide antisera may in part
reflect structural similarities of the peptides. The predicted secondary structures of peptides BSA101-28,
20321-19, 204050-69, 88/301-20,
and 203440-59 are predominantly alpha-helical (Table
5). Investigation of the helical
propensity of BSA101-28 using circular dichroism indicated
that this peptide has high alpha-helix potential, with 62 to 81% alpha
helix in 100% trifluoroethanol and 40 to 63% alpha helix in 50%
trifluoroethanol (data not shown). Therefore, the cross-reactive
antipeptide sera may recognize a common structure produced by the
alpha-helical coiled folding of the primary sequence, either as a
peptide on an ELISA plate or on the M or ML proteins of the
streptococci. Several studies have in fact reported that antipeptide
antibodies from the M protein can cross-react with several
alpha-helical proteins, including laminin, myosin, and tropomyosin
(8, 9, 31). It is thus conceivable that the cross-reactive
antipeptide antibodies can recognize and cross-opsonize other
nonhomologous alpha-helical M or ML proteins.
The advantages of using a vaccine incorporating peptides representing
amino-terminal sequences of the M protein is that they are more opsonic
than C-terminal antisera (26) and less likely to evoke
tissue-cross-reactive antibodies (10, 12, 14). None of the
peptide-specific antibodies cross-reacted with host proteins,
suggesting that a vaccine using these epitopes may not induce
antibody-mediated pathology. In terms of vaccine development, we have
now identified numerous opsonic epitopes specifically targeted to
GAS-endemic region. In order to protect against the numerous strains of
GAS, a vaccine would need to incorporate multiple protective epitopes.
Several studies have shown the potential of constructing
multivalent streptococcal vaccines capable of opsonizing multiple
serotypes of GAS (1, 2, 10, 11, 14). Thus far, up to eight
amino-terminal epitopes have been linked in tandem to produce a hybrid
protein that can produce bactericidal antibodies in immunized rabbits
(10, 11, 14). To develop a successful antistreptococcal
vaccine, it is critical to define epitopes that would induce broad
protective coverage. The frequency of GAS isolates collected from the
Northern Territory of Australia, represented by the amino-terminal M
protein peptides used in this study, has recently been investigated
(15; unpublished data). Based on these studies, it may
be possible to design a vaccine that will incorporate opsonic
amino-terminal epitopes from GAS commonly found in this region in
combination with cross-opsonic epitopes, including conserved-region
epitopes (3, 4, 5, 24, 26), to produce coverage against the
significant diversity of GAS strains found within the Aboriginal
communities of the Northern Territory.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by NHMRC (Australia), National Heart
Foundation of Australia, the Prince Charles Hospital Foundation, and
Cooperative Research Centre for Vaccine Technology.
We thank Laszlo Otvos, the Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pa., for
performing the circular dichroism analysis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: CRC for Vaccine
Technology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, QLD 4029, Australia. Phone: (61) 7 3362 0266. Fax: (61) 7 3362 0110. E-mail: michaelG{at}qimr.edu.au.
Editor:
D. L. Burns
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Beachey, E. H., and J. M. Seyer.
1986.
Protective and non-protective epitopes of chemically synthesised peptides of the NH2-terminal region of type 6 streptococcal M protein.
J. Immunol.
136:2287-2292[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Beachey, E. H.,
H. Gras-Masse,
A. Tarter,
M. Jolivet,
F. Audibert,
L. Chedid, and J. M. Seyer.
1986.
Opsonic antibodies evoked by hybrid peptides copies of types 5 and 24 streptococcal M proteins synthesise in tandem.
J. Exp. Med.
163:1451-1458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bessen, D., and V. A. and Fischetti.
1988.
Influence of intranasal immunization with synthetic peptides corresponding to conserved epitopes of M protein on mucosal colonization by group A streptococci.
Infect. Immun.
56:2666-2672[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Brandt, E. R.,
W. A. Hayman,
B. Currie,
J. Carapetis,
Y. Wood,
D. Jackson,
J. Cooper,
W. D. Melrose,
A. J. Saul, and M. F. Good.
1996.
Opsonic human antibodies from an endemic population specific for a conserved epitope on the M protein of group A streptococci.
Immunology
89:331-337[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Brandt, E. R.,
W. A. Hayman,
B. Currie,
S. Pruksakorn, and M. F. Good.
1997.
Human antibodies to the conserved region of the M protein: opsonisation of heterologous strains of group A streptococci.
Vaccine
16:1805-1812.
|
| 6.
|
Carapetis, J. R.,
D. R. Wolff, and B. J. Currie.
1996.
Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in the top end of Australia's Northern Territory.
Med. J. Aust.
164:146-149[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Coligan, J. E.,
A. M. Kruisbeek,
D. H. Margulie,
E. M. Shevach, and W. Strober.
1992.
Current protocols in immunology, vol. 2.
John Wiley, New York, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Cunningham, M. W.,
S. M. Antone,
M. Smart,
R. Liu, and S. Kosanke.
1997.
Molecular analysis of human cardiac myosin-cross-reactive B- and T-cell epitopes of the group A streptococcal M protein.
Infect. Immun.
65:3913-3923[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Cunningham, M. W.,
J. M. McCormack,
P. G. Fenderson,
M. Ho,
E. H. Beachey, and J. B. Dale.
1989.
Human and murine antibodies cross-reactive with streptococcal M protein and myosin recognise the sequence GLN-LYS-SER-LYS-GLN in M protein.
J. Immunol.
143:2677-2683[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Dale, J. B.,
E. Y. Chiang, and J. W. Lederer.
1993.
Recombinant tetravalent group A streptococcal M protein vaccine.
J. Immunol.
151:2188-2194[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Dale, J. B.
1999.
Multivalent group A streptococcal vaccine designed to optimise the immunogenicity of six tandem M protein fragments.
Vaccine
17:193-200[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dale, J. B., and E. H. Beachey.
1985.
Epitopes of streptococcal M proteins shared with cardiac myosin.
J. Exp. Med.
162:583-591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Dale, J. B.,
J. M. Seyer, and E. H. Beachey.
1983.
Type specific immunogenicity of a chemically synthesised peptide fragment of type 5 streptococcal M protein.
J. Exp. Med.
158:1727-1732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dale, J. B.,
M. Simmons,
E. C. Xhiang, and E. Y. Chiang.
1996.
Recombinant, octavalent group A streptococcal M protein vaccine.
Vaccine
14:944-948[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gardiner, D. L.,
A. M. Goodfellow,
D. R. Martin, and K. S. Sriprakash.
1998.
Group A streptococcal Vir types are M protein gene (emm) sequence-type specific.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:902-907[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Guilherme, L.,
E. Cunha-Neto,
V. Coelho,
R. Snitcowsky,
P. M. A. Pomerantzeff,
R. V. Assis,
B. S. Pedra,
J. Neumann,
A. Goldberg,
M. E. Pararroyo,
F. Pileggi, and J. Kalil.
1995.
Human heart infiltrating T-cell clones from rheumatic heart disease patients recognise both streptococcal and cardiac proteins.
Circulation
92:415-420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Hayman, W. A.,
E. R. Brandt,
W. A. Relf,
J. Cooper,
A. Saul, and M. F. Good.
1997.
Mapping the minimal T and B cell epitome within a peptide vaccine candidate from the conserved region of the M protein of group A streptococci.
Int. Immunol.
9:1723-1733[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Houghten, R. A.
1985.
General method for the rapid solid-phase synthesis of large numbers of peptides: specificity of antigen-antibody interaction at the level of individual amino acids.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:5231-5235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kehoe, M. A.
1991.
New aspects of Streptococcus pyogenes pathogenicity.
Rev. Med. Microbiol.
2:147-152.
|
| 20.
|
Lancefield, R. C.
1957.
Differentiation of group A streptococci with a common R antigen into three serological types, with special reference to the bactericidal test.
J. Exp. Med.
106:525-529[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Malmanche, S. A., and D. R. Martin.
1994.
Protective immunity to the group A streptococcus may only be strain specific.
Med. Microbiol. Immunol.
183:299-306[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Martin, D. R.,
L. M. Voss,
S.J. Walker, and D. Lennon.
1994.
Acute rheumatic fever in Auckland, New Zealand: spectrum of associated GAS different from expected.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.
13:264-269[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Nordet, P.
1992.
WHO programme for prevention of rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease in 16 developing countries: report for phase I (1986-90).
Bull. WHO
70:213-218[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Pruksakorn, S.,
B. Currie,
E. Brandt,
C. Phornphutkul,
S. Hunsakunachi,
A. Manmontri,
J. A. Robinson,
M. A. Kehoe,
A. Galbraith, and M. F. Good.
1994.
Identification of T-cell autoepitopes that cross-react with the carboxyterminal segment of the M protein of group A streptococci.
Int. Immunol.
6:1235-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Pruksakorn, S.,
C. Phornphutkul, and S. Boonchoo.
1990.
Prevalence of group A streptococci from school children in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chiang Mai Med. Bull.
29:15-26.
|
| 26.
|
Pruksakorn, S.,
A. Galbraith,
R. A. Houghten, and M. F. Good.
1992.
Conserved T and B cell epitopes on the M protein of group A Streptococci: Induction of bactericidal antibodies.
J. Immunol.
149:2729-2735[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Relf, W. A.
1993.
Molecular diversity in the M protein of Streptococcus pyogenes. Ph.D. thesis.
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
|
| 28.
|
Relf, W. A.,
D. R. Martin, and K. S. Sriprakash.
1992.
Identification of sequence types among the M-nontypeable group A streptococci.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:3190-3194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Sargent, S. J.,
E. H. Beachey,
C. E. Corbett, and J. B. Dale.
1987.
Sequence of protective epitopes of streptococcal M proteins shared with cardiac sarcolemmal membranes.
J. Immunol.
139:1285-1290[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Single, L. A., and D. R. Martin.
1992.
Clonal differences within M types of the group A streptococcus revealed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
91:85-90[CrossRef].
|
| 31.
|
Vashishtha, A., and V. A. Fischetti.
1993.
Surface exposed conserved region of the streptococcal M protein induces antibodies cross-reactive with denatured forms of myosin.
J. Immunol.
150:4693-4701[Abstract].
|
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6587-6594, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schulze, K., Medina, E., Chhatwal, G. S., Guzman, C. A.
(2003). Identification of B- and T-Cell Epitopes within the Fibronectin-Binding Domain of the SfbI Protein of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Immun.
71: 7197-7201
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Courtney, H. S., Hasty, D. L., Dale, J. B.
(2003). Serum Opacity Factor (SOF) of Streptococcus pyogenes Evokes Antibodies That Opsonize Homologous and Heterologous SOF-Positive Serotypes of Group A Streptococci. Infect. Immun.
71: 5097-5103
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Olive, C., Batzloff, M., Horvath, A., Clair, T., Yarwood, P., Toth, I., Good, M. F.
(2003). Potential of Lipid Core Peptide Technology as a Novel Self-Adjuvanting Vaccine Delivery System for Multiple Different Synthetic Peptide Immunogens. Infect. Immun.
71: 2373-2383
[Abstract]
[Full Text]