Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6677-6684, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Rocky Mountain Laboratories Microscopy Branch, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, Montana 59840
Received 5 July 2000/Returned for modification 16 August 2000/Accepted 8 September 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When Borrelia burgdorferi is transmitted from the tick vector to the mammalian host, the bacterium experiences alterations in its environment, such as changes in temperature and pH. Previously, we observed numerous alterations in the membrane protein profile when B. burgdorferi B31 was grown at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. Here we identify 11 genes localizing to linear plasmids that are up-regulated at pH 7.0 relative to pH 8.0 in vitro. Seven genes (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39 [encoding products that are 99% identical], and bbk01) were indirectly identified by proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Another gene, bba36, was identified by screening a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library with cross-adsorbed hyperimmune rabbit serum. Two additional genes, bba65 and bba73, were identified by Northern blot analysis. Genes bba64, bba65, bba66, bbj41/bbi39, and bba73 are members of paralogous gene family 54, and bbe31 is a member of the closely related paralogous gene family 60. Gene bba24 is part of a bicistronic operon with bba25 that encodes the well-characterized decorin binding proteins A and B. All 11 genes were transcriptionally regulated, yet the degree of pH regulation varied, with some genes more tightly regulated than others. The regions upstream of these pH-regulated genes appeared to be unrelated, yet many contained dyad repeats ranging from 12 to 25 nucleotides in length that may be involved in the regulation of these genes.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, is transmitted to a mammalian host by a tick vector of the Ixodes ricinus complex. During transmission the spirochete encounters fluctuations in growth parameters such as temperature, pH, and available nutrients. In response to its environment, B. burgdorferi is able to regulate several genes and the synthesis of numerous proteins (5, 7, 8, 12, 22, 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 38). These changes in gene expression are likely to play an important role in adaptation to its environment. The ability of B. burgdorferi to establish an infection in a potential host may rely on its ability to sense and adapt to these changing conditions.
Recently we reported over 37 alterations in the membrane protein profile when cells were grown at different pHs (5). The most striking changes were observed between cultures grown at pH 7.0 and 8.0. This is similar to the pH change encountered by the spirochetes during transmission from mammal to tick vector, respectively. Interestingly, one well-characterized protein, OspC, was observed to dramatically decrease in amount as the pH of the medium was raised to 8.0 (5). OspC synthesis is also influenced by temperature, where the amount of OspC produced is decreased at 23°C relative to 34°C (31); this suggests that ospC is under the coordinate regulation of pH and temperature. These observations correlate well with in vivo studies in which OspC is undetectable on spirochetes in the midguts of unfed ticks (alkaline pH, 23°C) (13, 31) but can be detected in the midguts of fed ticks (31) and within the skin of mammals infected by tick bite (pH 7.0 to 7.4, 34°C) (20, 24, 31, 32).
Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on proteins separated by two-dimensional nonequilibrinm pH gradient gel electrophoresis (2D-NEPHGE) in concert with immunoblotting, Northern analysis, and the screening of a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library with cross-adsorbed serum, we have determined the identities of 11 genes that are regulated by the environmental pH. Some of these pH-regulated genes and the proteins they encode have been previously identified and partially characterized, whereas others of the genes appear to encode hypothetical proteins (14). Here we demonstrate that genes bba03, dbpAB (bba24 and bba25), bba36, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39 (encoding proteins that are 99% identical [see Results]), and bbk01 of B. burgdorferi are regulated in vitro by the environmental pH. Further analysis of the DNA sequences upstream of these genes revealed putative operator-promoter regions consisting of features indicative of regulator binding sites in other organisms. These regions may be involved in the regulation of genes in response to the environmental pH in B. burgdorferi.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Low-passage (<6
passages), infectious B. burgdorferi B31 (4) was
grown to mid-log phase (5 × 107 cells per ml) under
an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 35°C in BSK-H medium (Sigma
Chemical Co., Saint Louis, Mo.). For pH studies the cells were then
concentrated by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min;
24°C) and resuspension in BSK-H. The spirochetes were then inoculated
at a final concentration of 107 per ml into BSK-H buffered
with 25 mM HEPES and adjusted to pH 7.0 or 8.0 with the addition of
either HCl or NaOH. Cells were incubated for 2 to 4 days and were
harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C)
(5). Virulent strains were previously tested in Syrian
hamsters as described elsewhere (23). Escherichia coli XL1-Blue MRF' and XLOLR were obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, Calif.). E. coli TOP10 was obtained from Invitrogen
Carlsbad, Calif.). Transformation- competent E. coli DH5
was purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, N.Y.). All E. coli strains were grown in Luria broth (LB) supplemented with the
appropriate antibiotic for selection according to the the instructions
of the suppliers.
B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library construction and screening. Genomic DNA from low-passage B. burgdorferi B31 was isolated by pheno-chloroform extraction as described by Marmur (26). A library was constructed by partial digestion of B. burgdorferi genomic DNA with Sau3AI (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and ligated into lambda Zap Express (Stratagene) digested with BamHI. The recombinant DNA was packaged, its titer was determined, and it was rescued as phagemid vector pBK-CMV (Stratagene). Plasmid DNA from recombinant clones was isolated using the Qiagen (Chatsworth, Calif.) plasmid minikit. The average insert size was determined by restriction endonuclease analysis of 20 random recombinant plasmids. DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8% agarose; 1× Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer; 80 V).
Antiborrelia rabbit serum raised against low-passage (<5 passages) B. burgdorferi B31 was cross-adsorbed with cell lysate from E. coli and virulent B. burgdorferi B31 grown at pH 8.0 using a previously described method (6). This yielded an antiserum that primarily recognized proteins synthesized at pH 7.0 but decreased in synthesis at pH 8.0. The recombinant phage genomic library was diluted and plated on LB per the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting plaques were transferred to nitrocellulose discs (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.) and probed with the cross-adsorbed serum (1 h; 37°C). The filter discs were washed in Tris-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) with the addition of 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T20), probed with goat anti-rabbit serum conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co.) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in TBS-T20 (45 min; 37°C), and washed in TBS-T20. Immunoreactive recombinant plaques were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Life Sciences, Inc., Arlington Heights, Ill). DNA inserts from positive clones were sequenced using standard T7 and T3 primers (Geneseek Inc., Lincoln, Nebr.), and positive clones were stored at
80°C in LB containing 25% glycerol.
Gene bba36 with its promoter region was PCR amplified using
primers A36.3 and A36.4 (Table 1). The
resultant amplicon was TA cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and transformed into
TOP10 One Shot chemically competent E. coli per the
instructions of the manufacturer (Invitrogen). This gave rise to
construct pCR2.1-A36, which was subsequently transformed into E. coli DH5
.
|
Isolation and quantitation of protein samples.
Once the
spirochetes grew to the desired density (5 × 107
cells per ml), they were harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C). The cell pellets were gently rinsed with
cold 50 mM NaCl in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6) (HEPES buffer), centrifuged a second time, and suspended in HEPES buffer. The cell suspensions were
lysed by two passes through a French pressure cell (16,000 lb/in2) (SLM-Aminco, Rochester, N.Y.), and cell debris was
removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C).
Total membranes (TM) were separated from the soluble protein fraction
by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g; 1 h; 4°C).
The membranes were rinsed once in HEPES buffer to remove residual
soluble proteins, pelleted again by ultracentrifugation, and
resuspended with the aid of a glass tissue homogenizer (Kontes Glass
Co., Vineland, N.J.) in 250 µl of HEPES buffer. Aliquots of cell
lysates and rinsed membranes were stored at
20°C. Protein
concentrations were determined by a modified Lowry protein assay
(25) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Sera used for immunoblots. Hyperimmune rabbit antiserum raised against live, low-passage B. burgdorferi B31 (hyperimmune serum) was produced as previously described (6). Polyclonal serum to P35 was kindly donated by Robert D. Gilmore of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Fort Collins, Colo. Polyclonal sera to DbpA and -B were kindly donated by Mark Hanson of MedImmune, Inc.
Electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with an SE600 gel apparatus. (Hoefer Scientific, San Francisco, Calif.). Twenty-five to 35 µg of protein was applied to each lane. 2D-NEPHGE, using a Hoefer SE600 gel apparatus, was performed as previously described (5). Proteins were visualized by staining with the Silver Stain Plus kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) or prepared for immunoblotting. Molecular weight standards were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories.
For immunoblotting, the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose (0.45-µm-pore-size Trans-Blot Transfer Medium; Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described by Towbin et al. (37) with a Bio-Rad Trans Blot Cell (30 V; 12 h; 4°C). After transfer, the proteins were visualized with Ponceau red (0.1% Ponceau red dye in 1.0% acetic acid), and the standards were marked. The nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T20 (3 h; 24°C), and immune serum diluted either 1:500, 1:1,000, or 1:10,000 in TBS-T20 (primary antibody) was applied to the blot (1 h; 24°C). The blot was washed twice in 100 to 200 ml of TBS-T20 for 10 min to remove residual primary antibody. Secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse antibody) (Sigma Chemical Co.) was diluted 1:5,000 in TBS-T20 and applied to the blot (45 min; 24°C), followed by three washes with 100 to 200 ml of TBS-T20. Reactive bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Life Sciences, Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The relative molecular masses of protein bands or spots were estimated by a two-variable statistic linear regression with molecular mass standards purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories.MALDI-TOF analysis.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was
performed at PerSeptive Biosystems (Framingham, Mass.) using a Voyager
DE STR MALDI-TOF S/N 4113 Biospectrometry Workstation (PerSeptive
Biosystems) on samples prepared as follows. 2D-NEPHGE was performed on
TM protein samples isolated from B31 exposed to medium at pH 7.0 and
8.0 as previously described (5). Gels were stained with
silver, and the protein spots were excised with a clean razor blade and
shipped to PE Biosystems in 5% acetic acid. At PE Biosystems gel
slices were prepared for analysis by destaining with a
ferricyanide-thiosulfate solution and washed in 50% acetonitrile
containing 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) (three times; 15 min
each; 24°C). Gel slices were dehydrated in 100% acetonitrile for 10 min, the acetonitrile was removed, and the gel slices were dried under
vacuum for 30 min. Samples were rehydrated with sequencing-grade
trypsin solution (10 µg/ml in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0) and
incubated overnight at 37°C. Peptides were extracted with 50%
acetonitrile-5% trifluoroacetic acid in distilled H2O and
concentrated with a Speed-Vac. Samples were mixed with the matrix
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and analyzed by MALDI-TOF. Mass
spectrometry profiles were searched against the National Center for
Biotechnology Information database using Protein Prospector from
University of California at San Francisco.
Northern analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from B. burgdorferi B31 cultures incubated at pH 7.0 and 8.0 using the
Ultraspec-II RNA isolation system (Biotecx, Houston, Tex.). RNA was
quantitated by absorbance at 260 nm and stored in 50-µl aliquots at
80°C. RNA was denatured with glyoxal and dimethyl sulfoxide for
1 h at 50°C, and 10 µg of total RNA per lane was separated on
a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel in 10 mM NaH2PO4 (pH
7.0) (80 V; 3 h). Separated RNA was transferred to a Hybond
N+ nylon membrane using a vacuum blotter system (6,000 Pa,
1 h; 20× SSC) [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium
citrate], air dried, auto-cross-linked, and stained with methylene
blue (0.03% methylene blue in 1.0% acetic acid). Millennium RNA
markers (Ambion, Inc., Austin, Tex.) were marked, and 23S and 16S rRNAs were noted as additional internal standards. RNA blots were stored dry
in the dark at 24°C until probed.
-32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (NEN Life
Science Products, Inc., Boston, Mass.) and primers specific for the
target gene of interest (Table 1). Target sequences to be used as
probes were amplified by PCR using the GeneAmp kit (Perkin-Elmer,
Branchburg, N.J.) with genomic DNA as a template. First-round
amplicons were purified by the process of agarose gel electrophoresis,
excision from the gel, and extraction using the GenElute agarose spin
column (Sigma Chemical Co.). PCR was performed a second time with the
eluted amplicons as templates. Second-round amplicons were cleaned with
the Quick Step PCR purification kit (Edge BioSystems, Gaithersburg,
Md.) and stored at
20°C until labeled. RNA blots were placed in a hybridization oven and prehybridized and hybridized with the
radiolabeled probes at 55°C in 1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin-7%
(wt/vol) SDS in 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. Membranes were washed
twice with 0.1% SDS in 2.0× SSC (55°C; 10 min.) and then washed
again with 0.1% SDS in 0.2× SSC (two times; 55°C; 10 min). The
rinsed membranes were then placed on autoradiography film at
70°C.
Since ospA expression appears to be unaffected by pH
(5), a Northern probe specific for ospA was used
as a control to ensure that equivalent amounts of RNA were loaded per
lane. Northern blots that had been probed previously were allowed to
decay until no signal was detected and were then probed with the
radiolabeled ospA fragment generated and labeled as
described above. Membranes were treated as described above and placed
on film. mRNA intensities and integrated density values were measured
using an AlphaImager 2000 digital imaging system (Alpha Innotech
Corporation, San Leandro, Calif.). All Northern blotting was performed
independently at least twice.
Computer analysis of 5' flanking regions of the B. burgdorferi B31 pH-regulated loci. Sequences 200 nucleotides (nt) 5' of bba03, bba25, bba36, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, bbe31, bbj41, and bbk01 were retrieved from the B. burgdorferi B31 genome sequence from The Institute of Genomic Research website (www.tigr.org) (14). The regions upstream of the pH-regulated genes were analyzed for percent identity, dyad repeats, direct repeats, and indirect repeats using Lasergene software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Sequences were aligned by the Clustal method using Megalign (DNASTAR).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of proteins separated by
2D-NEPHGE.
MALDI-TOF analysis was performed on several proteins
separated by 2D-NEPHGE that were detected in greater amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 1) (5).
The report obtained from PE Biosystems indicated with high probability
that seven of the peptide mass spectrometry profiles of proteins (spots
I-9, I-18, S-7, S-13, S-23, S-26, and S-27 in Fig. 1) matched with gene
products localizing to linear plasmid 25 (lp25), lp36, lp38, lp28-4,
and lp54 (Table 2). Four of these genes (bba64, bba66,
bbi39, and bbj41) were members of paralogous gene
family 54, and one gene (bbe31) was a member of paralogous
gene family 60. The gene product of bbj41 has 99% identity
to that of bbi39 (a member of the same gene family but found
on lp28-4). Since distinguishing between these two proteins would be
difficult, we refer to the genes as bbj41/bbi39 throughout this paper.
|
|
Comparison of B. burgdorferi TM samples from pH 7.0 and
8.0 probed with polyclonal sera to P35, DbpA, and DbpB.
In order
to verify the validity of the MALDI-TOF analysis, TM proteins from
cultures incubated at pH 7.0 and 8.0 were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and probed with polyclonal antibodies to P35, DbpA, and DbpB (Fig.
2). The anti-P35 polyclonal serum reacted
strongly to a band with an approximate molecular mass of 35 kDa (Fig.
2A) that was present in the pH 7.0 lane but undetectable in the pH 8.0 lane. Similarly, anti-DbpA and anti-DbpB strongly recognized bands of
the appropriate molecular masses that were again present in greater
amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 2B and C). This indicated that
MALDI-TOF analysis could reliably identify proteins differentially
expressed as a result of the altered pH.
|
Analysis of recombinant clones screened with cross-adsorbed
serum.
In addition to MALDI-TOF analysis of differentially
expressed proteins, serum cross-adsorbed with cell lysates from
spirochetes grown at pH 8.0 (Fig. 3A) was
used to screen a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library.
Screening of 20,000 plaques of a genomic library yielded only
10 immunoreactive plaques. One recombinant clone, designated 18c,
expressed a 25-kDa protein that reacted strongly with the
cross-adsorbed serum when the cell lysate was probed by immunoblotting
(Fig. 3B). Sequence analysis of the DNA insert and comparison to the
B31 genome sequence (14) indicated that recombinant clone
18c contained a 4.6-kb portion of lp54. This 4.6-kb segment included
six open reading frames (bba34 to bba39), five of
which encode hypothetical proteins and one (bba36) that
encodes a putative lipoprotein of approximately 24.2 kDa in molecular
mass.
|
Northern analysis of pH-regulated genes.
Probes specific for
pH-regulated genes indirectly identified by MALDI-TOF analysis were
hybridized with total RNA extracted from B. burgdorferi B31
grown in medium at pH 7.0 or pH 8.0 (Fig. 4). Transcripts of all genes appeared to
be increased in abundance in RNA isolated from cultures at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. Probes specific for bba66, bba24, and
bbk01 strongly hybridized with mRNA bands of the expected
size, and by densitometry they were found to be expressed >16-fold
higher at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 4 and Table
3). Similar results were obtained when
mRNA was hybridized with a probe specific for bba25 (data
not shown), indicating bba24 and bba25 were
cotranscribed in our strain. Probes specific for bba03, bba64,
bbe31, and bbj41 also hybridized with mRNA bands of the
appropriate size, but they showed only a two- to fivefold decrease in
expression at 8.0 relative to pH 7.0 (Fig. 4 and Table 3).
|
|
Computer analysis of the 5' flanking sequences upstream of
pH-regulated loci.
With the exception of bba24 and
bba25, the pH-regulated genes identified in this study were
all monocistronic as determined by Northern analysis (Fig. 4). We
analyzed the regions 200 nt upstream of the first codon of each gene
using Lasergene software in order to gain a better understanding of how
these particular genes may be regulated. With multiple-sequence
alignments of these upstream regions analyzed by the Clustal method, we
observed no significant homologies among the 11 pH-regulated loci. Even
the sequences upstream of the pH-regulated genes of paralogous family 54 that localize to lp54 (bba64, bba65, bba66, and
bba73) displayed little similarity to one another. For
example, the 200 nt 5' of bba64 and bba65 share
the greatest identity, at 44.3%, where a comparison of the same region
upstream of bba64 and bba73 revealed the lowest
sequence identity, at only 29.6%. Interestingly, many of the upstream
sequences contained regions of dyad symmetry ranging from 12 to 25 nt
in length (Table 4). We could not discern
a suitable regulator consensus sequence by comparison of the dyads but
presumed that these regions could be involved in the positive or
negative control of these genes in response to the environmental pH.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We reported in an earlier study that there are numerous alterations in the membrane protein profile of B. burgdorferi B31 when grown in BSK-H medium at pH 7.0 (the pH of mammals) compared to pH 8.0 (the pH of ticks) (5). Thus far we have identified 11 genes located on linear plasmids in B. burgdorferi B31 that are transcribed in larger amounts by spirochetes grown at pH 7.0 than by those grown at pH 8.0. Seven of the 11 genes (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39, and bbk01) were identified by MALDI-TOF analysis of membrane proteins separated by 2D-NEPHGE (Fig. 1 and Table 2), while immunoblotting confirmed that DbpB (encoded by bba25) was regulated by pH as well. A ninth gene, bba36, was identified by screening a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library with cross-adsorbed serum that had been enriched to recognize immunogens expressed at pH 7.0 (Fig. 3). Lastly, two genes (bba65 and bba73) were identified by Northern blot analysis alone (Fig. 4).
MALDI-TOF analysis and Northern blotting suggested that five members of paralogous gene family 54 (bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, and bbj41/bbi39) were differentially expressed as the pH of the medium was altered from 7.0 to 8.0. Paralogous gene family 54 is composed of one pseudogene and 13 paralogs, most of which are defined as hypothetical proteins with unknown function (14). One gene in particular, bba64, encodes the well-characterized lipoprotein P35 (3, 15, 22). P35, an immunogen often associated with early Lyme disease (10, 15), was previously observed to be synthesized in larger amounts as the culture cell density increased, and the control of its expression has been attributed to the growth phase of the organism (21, 22). We have found that spirochetes inoculated to the same cell density from a single starter culture into medium at either pH 7.0 or 8.0 displayed no apparent change in growth rate, but when cells from both culture conditions were harvested during the same phase of growth (mid-log phase), P35 was detectable in cultures grown at pH 7.0 but not in cultures grown at pH 8.0 (Fig. 2). These experiments strongly suggest that the increase in P35 in stationary-phase cultures (22) may actually be a response to the acidification of the medium, which occurs in standard BSK-H medium as cells enter late log and stationary phases. We have eliminated this pH change due to growth by adding 25 mM HEPES to the medium to allow for increased buffering capacity as the cell density increases.
Northern blots indicated that the seven genes identified by MALDI-TOF analysis (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39, and bbk01), four of which are members of gene families 54 and 60, were most likely regulated at the level of transcription. Transcripts of these genes were observed in larger amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 4). This led to subsequent analysis of other members of paralogous gene families 54 and 60 by Northern blotting. Hence, we identified two additional members of paralogous gene family 54, bba65 and bba73, that were regulated by the in vitro environmental pH (Fig. 4). Interestingly, bba64, bba65, and bba66 were recently observed by Anguita et al. to be up-regulated in mice infected with a clonal isolate of B. burgdorferi N40 (cN40) (1). More importantly, a high-passage isolate of cN40 which was found to have lost the ability to up-regulate these genes during infection also lacked the ability to cause disease in the C3H/HeN mouse model (1). We determined that bba64, bba65, and bba66 were up-regulated at pH 7.0 (consistent with expression in the mammalian environment) yet down-regulated at pH 8.0 (similar to the tick vector environment), suggesting that pH-regulated genes may play a role in adaptation and/or in the manifestation of disease within the mammalian host.
Similar to some members of paralogous gene family 54, DbpA and -B are expressed during mammalian infection and elicit high antibody titers with low-dose inocula of cultured spirochetes (7, 11, 18, 19), but researchers have shown that immunization with DbpA, but not DbpB, confers protection in mice challenged by a needle inoculm (11, 19). By MALDI-TOF, immunoblot, and Northern blot analyses we were able to determine that DbpA and -B (products of bba24 and bba25, respectively) were up-regulated at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. DbpA and -B appear to localize to the outer surface of the cell (16, 18) and are in a bicistronic operon encoded on lp48 in B. burgdorferi N40 (11) but on lp56 in B. burgdorferi B31 (14). Recent evidence suggests that hyperimmune DbpA antiserum is bactericidal in vitro and is effective against a large number of diverse B. burgdorferi isolates. These data indicate a conserved protective epitope within DbpA and have made this immunogenic lipoprotein an attractive alternative vaccine candidate (30). Interestingly, DbpA and -B appear to be coordinately regulated by pH and temperature (7, 33). These observations highlight the importance of the effects of pH and temperature on differential expression in B. burgdorferi and adaptation to the mammalian host.
In concert with MALDI-TOF analysis, a genomic library was screened with cross-adsorbed serum that reacted primarily with immunogens expressed at pH 7.0 and not at pH 8.0 (Fig. 3A). Using this method, we were able to identify an additional pH-regulated gene, bba36. By Northern blot analysis we observed that bba36 was expressed at a ninefold higher level at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0, and we have evidence that this gene is under the coordinate regulation of temperature and pH (not shown), similar to the case for ospC (5). Gene bba36, like the other pH-regulated genes described in this study, is located on a linear plasmid. However, we have preliminary data that suggest that not all pH-regulated genes are found on linear plasmids and that some may map to circular plasmids (like ospC) and to the chromosome as well (not shown).
Ten of the 11 pH-regulated genes that we have identified either encode or are predicted to encode lipoproteins, yet bbk01 seems to be the exception. Gene bbk01 encodes a protein (BBK01) with an estimated molecular mass of 34 kDa and is one of five genes that make up paralogous gene family 12. BBK01 (spot S-7) was originally identified as a membrane protein (Fig. 1) (5), and a search of the predicted amino acid sequence using a dense alignment surface algorithm (9) identified a putative transmembrane segment at the N terminus, suggesting that BBK01 is an integral membrane protein. The proteins encoded by the remaining members of this gene family (bbg01, bbh37, bbj08, and bb0844) appear to have similar transmembrane motifs, but the extent of their regulation by pH has not been determined.
It was apparent by Northern blot analysis that the degrees of pH regulation observed among the genes identified in this study differed significantly (Fig. 4). Some were highly up-regulated (i.e. bba65), others displayed only moderate up-regulation (e.g., bbe31), and a few presented with a lower level of up-regulation (e.g., bbj41) at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0 (Fig. 4 and Table 3). We were curious if any features indicative of regulatory regions could be found upstream of these pH-regulated loci, and if so, how similar were these regions. Computer analysis of approximately 200 nt 5' to these genes demonstrated that the regions upstream were quite dissimilar even among paralogous genes. This is different from what has been observed for the erp genes, where the regions 5' to the erp genes share greater than 80% identity (35). We did determine that upstream of bba03, bba25, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, and bbe31 were regions of dyad symmetry that ranged from 12 to 25 nt in length. Furthermore, upstream of bba25 and bba64 were two dyads (Table 4).
Not all of the pH-regulated genes we observed had dyad repeats upstream. In other genes, like bbk01 and ospC, we noticed large inverted repeats, and upstream of bba36 we identified an overlapping direct repeat of 22 nt in length. We could not readily identify any similar features 5' to bbj41, but we did find an inverted repeat 5' to bbi39. Not surprisingly, bbj41/bbi39 displayed the least difference in the amount of transcript between pH 7.0 and 8.0 (Fig. 4). The role that these features may play in the pH regulation of these genes remains to be determined, but their location just upstream of these pH-regulated genes warrants further investigation.
We have identified in B. burgdorferi B31 11 genes located on linear plasmids that are regulated by the environmental pH, where transcript was more abundant at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0. Understanding how these and other genes are regulated by environmental cues, such as pH and temperature, will aid in elucidating how this spirochete adapts to the changing environments of the tick vector and the mammalian host. These adaptations that occur as the bacteria are passed from vector to host are likely to be vital in allowing the organism to invade, infect, and cause disease in susceptible hosts. The role that these 11 pH-regulated loci play in the disease process remains to be determined, but considering the recent advancements in Borrelia genetics (2), the resolution of their function in pathogenesis is approaching.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Rosa, T. Schwan, P. Stewart, and J. Bono for comments on the manuscript; G. Hettrick and A. Mora for artwork and photography; and R. Gilmore for antibodies to P35.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 903 South 4th St., Hamilton, MT 59840. Phone: (406)363-9407. Fax: (406) 363-9371. E-mail: jcarroll{at}niaid.nih.gov.
Editor: D. L. Burns
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Anguita, J.,
S. Samanta,
B. Revilla,
K. Suk,
S. Das,
S. W. Barthold, and E. Fikrig.
2000.
Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression in vivo and spirochete pathogenicity.
Infect. Immun.
68:1222-1230 |
| 2. |
Bono, J. L.,
A. F. Elias,
J. J. Kupko III,
B. Stevenson,
K. Tilly, and P. Rosa.
2000.
Efficient targeted mutagenesis in Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2445-2452 |
| 3. | Brunet, L. R., C. Sellitto, A. Spielman, and S. R. Telford, III. 1995. Antibody response of the mouse reservoir of Borrelia burgdorferi in nature. Infect. Immun. 63:3030-3036[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Burgdorfer, W.,
A. G. Barbour,
S. F. Hayes,
J. L. Benach,
E. Grunwaldt, and J. P. Davis.
1982.
Lyme disease a tick borne spirochetosis?
Science
216:1317-1319 |
| 5. |
Carroll, J. A.,
C. F. Garon, and T. G. Schwan.
1999.
Effects of environmental pH on membrane proteins in Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
67:3181-3187 |
| 6. | Carroll, J. A., and F. C. Gherardini. 1996. Membrane protein variations associated with in vitro passage of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 64:392-398[Abstract]. |
| 7. |
Cassatt, D. R.,
N. K. Patel,
N. D. Ulbrandt, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
DbpA, but not OspA, is expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi during spirochetemia and is a target for protective antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
66:5379-5387 |
| 8. |
Champion, C. I.,
D. R. Blanco,
J. T. Skare,
D. A. Haake,
M. Giladi,
D. Foley,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1994.
A 9.0-kilobase-pair circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferi encodes an exported protein: evidence for expression only during infection.
Infect. Immun.
62:2653-2661 |
| 9. |
Cserzo, M.,
E. Wallin,
I. Simon,
G. von Heijne, and A. Elofsson.
1997.
Prediction of transmembrane alpha-helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: the dense alignment surface method.
Protein Eng.
10:673-676 |
| 10. | Engstrom, S. M., E. Shoop, and R. C. Johnson. 1995. Immunoblot interpretation criteria for serodiagnosis of early Lyme disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:419-427[Abstract]. |
| 11. |
Feng, S.,
E. Hodzic,
B. Stevenson, and S. W. Barthold.
1998.
Humoral immunity to Borrelia burgdorferi N40 decorin binding proteins during infection of laboratory mice.
Infect. Immun.
66:2827-2835 |
| 12. | Fikrig, E., W. Feng, J. Aversa, R. T. Schoen, and R. A. Flavell. 1998. Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi genes during erythema migrans and Lyme arthritis. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1198-1201[Medline]. |
| 13. | Fingerle, V., U. Hauser, G. Liegl, B. Petko, V. Preac-Mursic, and B. Wilske. 1995. Expression of outer surface proteins A and C of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1867-1869[Abstract]. |
| 14. | Fraser, C. M., S. Casjens, W. M. Huang, G. G. Sutton, R. Clayton, R. Lathigra, O. White, K. A. Ketchum, R. Dodson, E. K. Hickey, M. Gwinn, B. Dougherty, J. F. Tomb, R. D. Fleischmann, D. Richardson, J. Peterson, A. R. Kerlavage, J. Quackenbush, S. Salzberg, M. Hanson, R. van Vugt, N. Palmer, M. D. Adams, J. Gocayne, J. C. Venter, et al. 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580-586[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Gilmore, R. D., Jr., K. J. Kappel, and B. J. Johnson. 1997. Molecular characterization of a 35-kilodalton protein of Borrelia burgdorferi, an antigen of diagnostic importance in early Lyme disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:86-91[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Guo, B. P., E. L. Brown, D. W. Dorward, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook. 1998. Decorin-binding adhesins from Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol. 30:711-723[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Guo, B. P., S. J. Norris, L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook. 1995. Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin. Infect. Immun. 63:3467-3472[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Hagman, K. E.,
P. Lahdenne,
T. G. Popova,
S. F. Porcella,
D. R. Akins,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1998.
Decorin-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi is encoded within a two-gene operon and is protective in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2674-2683 |
| 19. |
Hanson, M. S.,
D. R. Cassatt,
B. P. Guo,
N. K. Patel,
M. P. McCarthy,
D. W. Dorward, and M. Hook.
1998.
Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection.
Infect. Immun.
66:2143-2153 |
| 20. | Hofmeister, E. K., and J. E. Childs. 1995. Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi sequentially isolated from Peromyscus leucopus captured at a Lyme disease enzootic site. J. Infect. Dis. 172:462-469[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Indest, K. J., and M. T. Philipp.
2000.
DNA-binding proteins possibly involved in regulation of the post-logarithmic-phase expression of lipoprotein P35 in Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Bacteriol.
182:522-525 |
| 22. | Indest, K. J., R. Ramamoorthy, M. Sole, R. D. Gilmore, B. J. Johnson, and M. T. Philipp. 1997. Cell-density-dependent expression of Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins in vitro. Infect. Immun. 65:1165-1171[Abstract]. |
| 23. | Johnson, R. C., N. Marek, and C. Kodner. 1984. Infection of Syrian hamsters with Lyme disease spirochetes, J. Clin. Microbiol. 20:1099-1101. |
| 24. | Leuba-Garcia, S., R. Martinez, and L. Gern. 1998. Expression of outer surface proteins A and C of Borrelia afzelii in Ixodes ricinus ticks and in the skin of mice. Zentbl. Bakteriol. 287:475-484. |
| 25. | Markwell, M. A., S. M. Haas, L. L. Bieber, and N. E. Tolbert. 1978. A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal. Biochem. 87:206-210[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Marmur, J. 1961. A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208-218. |
| 27. | Oschmann, P., H. J. Wellensiek, W. Zhong, W. Dorndorf, and K. W. Pflughaupt. 1997. Relationship between the Borrelia burgdorferi specific immune response and different stages and syndromes in neuroborreliosis. Infection 25:292-297[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Pappin, D. J. C., P. Hojrup, and A. J. Bleasby. 1993. Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting. Curr. Biol. 3:327-332[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Ramamoorthy, R., and M. T. Philipp.
1998.
Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi proteins during growth in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
66:5119-5124 |
| 30. |
Roberts, W. C.,
B. A. Mullikin,
R. Lathigra, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
Molecular analysis of sequence heterogeneity among genes encoding decorin binding proteins A and B of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato.
Infect. Immun.
66:5275-5285 |
| 31. |
Schwan, T. G.,
J. Piesman,
W. T. Golde,
M. C. Dolan, and P. A. Rosa.
1995.
Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2909-2913 |
| 32. |
Seinost, G.,
D. E. Dykhuizen,
R. J. Dattwyler,
W. T. Golde,
J. J. Dunn,
I. N. Wang,
G. P. Wormser,
M. E. Schriefer, and B. J. Luft.
1999.
Four clones of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto cause invasive infection in humans.
Infect. Immun.
67:3518-3524 |
| 33. |
Skare, J. T.,
D. M. Foley,
S. R. Hernandez,
D. C. Moore,
D. R. Blanco,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1999.
Cloning and molecular characterization of plasmid-encoded antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
67:4407-4417 |
| 34. | Stevenson, B., T. G. Schwan, and P. A. Rosa. 1995. Temperature-related differential expression of antigens in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 63:4535-4539[Abstract]. |
| 35. |
Stevenson, B.,
K. Tilly, and P. A. Rosa.
1996.
A family of genes located on four separate 32-kilobase circular plasmids in Borrelia burgdorferi B31.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3508-3516 |
| 36. |
Suk, K.,
S. Das,
W. Sun,
B. Jwang,
S. W. Barthold,
R. A. Flavell, and E. Fikrig.
1995.
Borrelia burgdorferi genes selectively expressed in the infected host.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4269-4273 |
| 37. |
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354 |
| 38. | Wallich, R., C. Brenner, M. D. Kramer, and M. M. Simon. 1995. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel linear-plasmid-encoded gene, pG, of Borrelia burgdorferi expressed only in vivo. Infect. Immun. 63:3327-3335[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|