Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6677-6684, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Identification of 11 pH-Regulated Genes in
Borrelia burgdorferi Localizing to Linear Plasmids
James A.
Carroll,*
Rebecca M.
Cordova, and
Claude F.
Garon
Rocky Mountain Laboratories Microscopy Branch, Rocky
Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, Hamilton, Montana 59840
Received 5 July 2000/Returned for modification 16 August
2000/Accepted 8 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
When Borrelia burgdorferi is transmitted from the tick
vector to the mammalian host, the bacterium experiences alterations in
its environment, such as changes in temperature and pH. Previously, we
observed numerous alterations in the membrane protein profile when
B. burgdorferi B31 was grown at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. Here we identify 11 genes localizing to linear plasmids that are up-regulated at pH 7.0 relative to pH 8.0 in vitro. Seven genes (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39 [encoding
products that are 99% identical], and bbk01) were
indirectly identified by proteomic analysis of membrane proteins.
Another gene, bba36, was identified by screening a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library with cross-adsorbed hyperimmune
rabbit serum. Two additional genes, bba65 and
bba73, were identified by Northern blot analysis. Genes bba64, bba65, bba66, bbj41/bbi39, and bba73 are
members of paralogous gene family 54, and bbe31 is a member
of the closely related paralogous gene family 60. Gene
bba24 is part of a bicistronic operon with bba25 that encodes the well-characterized decorin binding
proteins A and B. All 11 genes were transcriptionally regulated, yet
the degree of pH regulation varied, with some genes more tightly
regulated than others. The regions upstream of these pH-regulated genes appeared to be unrelated, yet many contained dyad repeats ranging from
12 to 25 nucleotides in length that may be involved in the regulation
of these genes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Borrelia burgdorferi, the
causative agent of Lyme disease, is transmitted to a mammalian host by
a tick vector of the Ixodes ricinus complex. During
transmission the spirochete encounters fluctuations in growth
parameters such as temperature, pH, and available nutrients. In
response to its environment, B. burgdorferi is able to
regulate several genes and the synthesis of numerous proteins (5,
7, 8, 12, 22, 29, 31, 33, 34, 36, 38). These changes in gene
expression are likely to play an important role in adaptation to its
environment. The ability of B. burgdorferi to establish an
infection in a potential host may rely on its ability to sense and
adapt to these changing conditions.
Recently we reported over 37 alterations in the membrane protein
profile when cells were grown at different pHs (5). The most
striking changes were observed between cultures grown at pH 7.0 and
8.0. This is similar to the pH change encountered by the spirochetes
during transmission from mammal to tick vector, respectively.
Interestingly, one well-characterized protein, OspC, was observed to
dramatically decrease in amount as the pH of the medium was raised to
8.0 (5). OspC synthesis is also influenced by temperature,
where the amount of OspC produced is decreased at 23°C relative to
34°C (31); this suggests that ospC is under the
coordinate regulation of pH and temperature. These observations correlate well with in vivo studies in which OspC is undetectable on
spirochetes in the midguts of unfed ticks (alkaline pH, 23°C) (13, 31) but can be detected in the midguts of fed ticks
(31) and within the skin of mammals infected by tick bite
(pH 7.0 to 7.4, 34°C) (20, 24, 31, 32).
Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight
(MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on proteins separated by two-dimensional nonequilibrinm pH gradient gel electrophoresis (2D-NEPHGE) in concert with immunoblotting, Northern analysis, and the
screening of a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library with
cross-adsorbed serum, we have determined the identities of 11 genes that are regulated by the environmental pH. Some of these
pH-regulated genes and the proteins they encode have been previously
identified and partially characterized, whereas others of the genes
appear to encode hypothetical proteins (14). Here we
demonstrate that genes bba03, dbpAB (bba24 and
bba25), bba36, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, bbe31,
bbj41/bbi39 (encoding proteins that are 99% identical [see
Results]), and bbk01 of B. burgdorferi are
regulated in vitro by the environmental pH. Further analysis of the DNA
sequences upstream of these genes revealed putative operator-promoter
regions consisting of features indicative of regulator binding sites in
other organisms. These regions may be involved in the regulation of
genes in response to the environmental pH in B. burgdorferi.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Low-passage (<6
passages), infectious B. burgdorferi B31 (4) was
grown to mid-log phase (5 × 107 cells per ml) under
an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 35°C in BSK-H medium (Sigma
Chemical Co., Saint Louis, Mo.). For pH studies the cells were then
concentrated by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min;
24°C) and resuspension in BSK-H. The spirochetes were then inoculated
at a final concentration of 107 per ml into BSK-H buffered
with 25 mM HEPES and adjusted to pH 7.0 or 8.0 with the addition of
either HCl or NaOH. Cells were incubated for 2 to 4 days and were
harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C)
(5). Virulent strains were previously tested in Syrian
hamsters as described elsewhere (23). Escherichia coli XL1-Blue MRF' and XLOLR were obtained from Stratagene (La Jolla, Calif.). E. coli TOP10 was obtained from Invitrogen
Carlsbad, Calif.). Transformation- competent E. coli DH5
was purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, N.Y.). All E. coli strains were grown in Luria broth (LB) supplemented with the
appropriate antibiotic for selection according to the the instructions
of the suppliers.
B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library
construction and screening.
Genomic DNA from low-passage B. burgdorferi B31 was isolated by pheno-chloroform extraction as
described by Marmur (26). A library was constructed by
partial digestion of B. burgdorferi genomic DNA with
Sau3AI (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and ligated into lambda Zap
Express (Stratagene) digested with BamHI. The recombinant DNA was packaged, its titer was determined, and it was rescued as
phagemid vector pBK-CMV (Stratagene). Plasmid DNA from recombinant clones was isolated using the Qiagen (Chatsworth, Calif.) plasmid minikit. The average insert size was determined by restriction endonuclease analysis of 20 random recombinant plasmids. DNA fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8% agarose; 1× Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer; 80 V).
Antiborrelia rabbit serum raised against low-passage (<5 passages)
B. burgdorferi B31 was cross-adsorbed with cell lysate from
E. coli and virulent B. burgdorferi B31
grown at pH 8.0 using a previously described method (6).
This yielded an antiserum that primarily recognized proteins
synthesized at pH 7.0 but decreased in synthesis at pH 8.0. The
recombinant phage genomic library was diluted and plated on LB
per the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting plaques were
transferred to nitrocellulose discs (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.)
and probed with the cross-adsorbed serum (1 h; 37°C). The filter
discs were washed in Tris-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl in 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) with the addition of 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T20), probed with goat anti-rabbit serum conjugated
with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co.) at a dilution of
1:5,000 in TBS-T20 (45 min; 37°C), and washed in TBS-T20. Immunoreactive recombinant plaques were visualized
using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Life Sciences, Inc., Arlington Heights, Ill). DNA inserts from positive clones were sequenced using standard T7 and T3 primers (Geneseek Inc., Lincoln, Nebr.), and positive clones were stored at
80°C in LB containing 25% glycerol.
Gene
bba36 with its promoter region was PCR amplified using
primers A36.3 and A36.4 (Table
1). The
resultant amplicon was
TA cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO and transformed into
TOP10 One Shot
chemically competent
E. coli per the
instructions of the manufacturer
(Invitrogen). This gave rise to
construct pCR2.1-A36, which was
subsequently transformed into
E. coli DH5

.
Isolation and quantitation of protein samples.
Once the
spirochetes grew to the desired density (5 × 107
cells per ml), they were harvested by centrifugation (8,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C). The cell pellets were gently rinsed with
cold 50 mM NaCl in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.6) (HEPES buffer), centrifuged a second time, and suspended in HEPES buffer. The cell suspensions were
lysed by two passes through a French pressure cell (16,000 lb/in2) (SLM-Aminco, Rochester, N.Y.), and cell debris was
removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g; 10 min; 4°C).
Total membranes (TM) were separated from the soluble protein fraction
by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g; 1 h; 4°C).
The membranes were rinsed once in HEPES buffer to remove residual
soluble proteins, pelleted again by ultracentrifugation, and
resuspended with the aid of a glass tissue homogenizer (Kontes Glass
Co., Vineland, N.J.) in 250 µl of HEPES buffer. Aliquots of cell
lysates and rinsed membranes were stored at
20°C. Protein
concentrations were determined by a modified Lowry protein assay
(25) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Sera used for immunoblots.
Hyperimmune rabbit antiserum
raised against live, low-passage B. burgdorferi B31
(hyperimmune serum) was produced as previously described
(6). Polyclonal serum to P35 was kindly donated by Robert D. Gilmore of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Fort
Collins, Colo. Polyclonal sera to DbpA and -B were kindly donated by
Mark Hanson of MedImmune, Inc.
Electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
Proteins were separated
by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) with an SE600 gel apparatus. (Hoefer Scientific, San
Francisco, Calif.). Twenty-five to 35 µg of protein was applied to
each lane. 2D-NEPHGE, using a Hoefer SE600 gel apparatus, was performed
as previously described (5). Proteins were visualized by
staining with the Silver Stain Plus kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, Calif.) or prepared for immunoblotting. Molecular weight
standards were purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories.
For immunoblotting, the proteins were electrophoretically transferred
to nitrocellulose (0.45-µm-pore-size Trans-Blot Transfer
Medium;
Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described by Towbin et al. (
37)
with a Bio-Rad Trans Blot Cell (30 V; 12 h; 4°C). After
transfer,
the proteins were visualized with Ponceau red (0.1% Ponceau
red
dye in 1.0% acetic acid), and the standards were marked. The
nitrocellulose
membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in
TBS-T
20 (3 h;
24°C), and immune serum diluted either
1:500, 1:1,000, or 1:10,000
in TBS-T
20 (primary antibody)
was applied to the blot (1 h; 24°C).
The blot was washed twice in 100 to 200 ml of TBS-T
20 for 10 min
to remove residual primary
antibody. Secondary antibody (horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse antibody)
(Sigma Chemical Co.) was
diluted 1:5,000 in TBS-T
20 and applied
to the blot (45 min;
24°C), followed by three washes with 100
to 200 ml of
TBS-T
20. Reactive bands were visualized with the
enhanced
chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Life Sciences, Inc.)
in accordance with
the manufacturer's specifications. The relative
molecular masses of
protein bands or spots were estimated by a
two-variable statistic
linear regression with molecular mass standards
purchased from Bio-Rad
Laboratories.
MALDI-TOF analysis.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was
performed at PerSeptive Biosystems (Framingham, Mass.) using a Voyager
DE STR MALDI-TOF S/N 4113 Biospectrometry Workstation (PerSeptive
Biosystems) on samples prepared as follows. 2D-NEPHGE was performed on
TM protein samples isolated from B31 exposed to medium at pH 7.0 and
8.0 as previously described (5). Gels were stained with
silver, and the protein spots were excised with a clean razor blade and
shipped to PE Biosystems in 5% acetic acid. At PE Biosystems gel
slices were prepared for analysis by destaining with a
ferricyanide-thiosulfate solution and washed in 50% acetonitrile
containing 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) (three times; 15 min
each; 24°C). Gel slices were dehydrated in 100% acetonitrile for 10 min, the acetonitrile was removed, and the gel slices were dried under
vacuum for 30 min. Samples were rehydrated with sequencing-grade
trypsin solution (10 µg/ml in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0) and
incubated overnight at 37°C. Peptides were extracted with 50%
acetonitrile-5% trifluoroacetic acid in distilled H2O and
concentrated with a Speed-Vac. Samples were mixed with the matrix
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and analyzed by MALDI-TOF. Mass
spectrometry profiles were searched against the National Center for
Biotechnology Information database using Protein Prospector from
University of California at San Francisco.
Northern analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from B. burgdorferi B31 cultures incubated at pH 7.0 and 8.0 using the
Ultraspec-II RNA isolation system (Biotecx, Houston, Tex.). RNA was
quantitated by absorbance at 260 nm and stored in 50-µl aliquots at
80°C. RNA was denatured with glyoxal and dimethyl sulfoxide for
1 h at 50°C, and 10 µg of total RNA per lane was separated on
a 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel in 10 mM NaH2PO4 (pH
7.0) (80 V; 3 h). Separated RNA was transferred to a Hybond
N+ nylon membrane using a vacuum blotter system (6,000 Pa,
1 h; 20× SSC) [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium
citrate], air dried, auto-cross-linked, and stained with methylene
blue (0.03% methylene blue in 1.0% acetic acid). Millennium RNA
markers (Ambion, Inc., Austin, Tex.) were marked, and 23S and 16S rRNAs were noted as additional internal standards. RNA blots were stored dry
in the dark at 24°C until probed.
Radioactive probes for Northern blots were generated using the RadPrime
labeling kit (Life Technologies) according to the
manufacturer's
instructions with [

-
32P]dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) (NEN Life
Science Products, Inc., Boston,
Mass.) and primers specific for the
target gene of interest (Table
1). Target sequences to be used as
probes were amplified by PCR
using the GeneAmp kit (Perkin-Elmer,
Branchburg, N.J.) with genomic
DNA as a template. First-round
amplicons were purified by the
process of agarose gel electrophoresis,
excision from the gel,
and extraction using the GenElute agarose spin
column (Sigma Chemical
Co.). PCR was performed a second time with the
eluted amplicons
as templates. Second-round amplicons were cleaned with
the Quick
Step PCR purification kit (Edge BioSystems, Gaithersburg,
Md.)
and stored at

20°C until labeled. RNA blots were placed in a
hybridization oven and prehybridized and hybridized with the
radiolabeled
probes at 55°C in 1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin-7%
(wt/vol)
SDS in 0.5 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. Membranes were washed
twice
with 0.1% SDS in 2.0× SSC (55°C; 10 min.) and then washed
again
with 0.1% SDS in 0.2× SSC (two times; 55°C; 10 min). The
rinsed
membranes were then placed on autoradiography film at

70°C.
Since
ospA expression appears to be unaffected by pH
(
5), a Northern
probe specific for
ospA was used
as a control to ensure that equivalent
amounts of RNA were loaded per
lane. Northern blots that had been
probed previously were allowed to
decay until no signal was detected
and were then probed with the
radiolabeled
ospA fragment generated
and labeled as
described above. Membranes were treated as described
above and placed
on film. mRNA intensities and integrated density
values were measured
using an AlphaImager 2000 digital imaging
system (Alpha Innotech
Corporation, San Leandro, Calif.). All
Northern blotting was performed
independently at least
twice.
Computer analysis of 5' flanking regions of the B. burgdorferi B31 pH-regulated loci.
Sequences 200 nucleotides
(nt) 5' of bba03, bba25, bba36, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73,
bbe31, bbj41, and bbk01 were retrieved from the
B. burgdorferi B31 genome sequence from The Institute of
Genomic Research website (www.tigr.org) (14). The regions upstream of the pH-regulated genes were analyzed for percent identity, dyad repeats, direct repeats, and indirect repeats using Lasergene software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, Wis.). Sequences were aligned by the
Clustal method using Megalign (DNASTAR).
 |
RESULTS |
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of proteins separated by
2D-NEPHGE.
MALDI-TOF analysis was performed on several proteins
separated by 2D-NEPHGE that were detected in greater amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 1) (5).
The report obtained from PE Biosystems indicated with high probability
that seven of the peptide mass spectrometry profiles of proteins (spots
I-9, I-18, S-7, S-13, S-23, S-26, and S-27 in Fig. 1) matched with gene
products localizing to linear plasmid 25 (lp25), lp36, lp38, lp28-4,
and lp54 (Table 2). Four of these genes (bba64, bba66,
bbi39, and bbj41) were members of paralogous gene
family 54, and one gene (bbe31) was a member of paralogous
gene family 60. The gene product of bbj41 has 99% identity
to that of bbi39 (a member of the same gene family but found
on lp28-4). Since distinguishing between these two proteins would be
difficult, we refer to the genes as bbj41/bbi39 throughout this paper.

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Comparison of 2D-NEPHGE membrane protein profiles from
B. burgdorferi B31 grown at pH 7.0 and 8.0 by silver
staining (A) and by immunoblotting and probing with hyperimmune serum
(B). 2D-NEPHGE profiles were reproduced from reference 5. The acidic
ends are to the left. OspA and OspC are indicated as reference marks.
Molecular mass standards in kilodaltons are indicated on the left of
each panel.
|
|
Sequence analysis of paralogous gene families 54 and 60 suggested that
these two families are closely related, and phylogenetic
analysis of
the genes or the proteins they encode indicated that
there was some
overlap between the two putative families (data
not shown). Gene
bba64 encodes the well-characterized P35 (
3,
22,
27,
29), a protein that is produced early during infection
(
10,
15) and whose expression was reported to be dependent
on cell
density (
22). Genes
bba66, bbe31, and
bbj41/bbi39 encode
lipoproteins with approximate molecular
masses of 46, 28, and
33 kDa, respectively, and were identified by
sequence analysis
of the genome (
14).
In addition to genes of families 54 and 60, we identified
bba03,
bba24, and
bbk01 by MALDI-TOF analysis (Table
2). Gene
bba03 encodes a
putative lipoprotein of unknown function with a molecular
mass of 19 kDa. Gene
bba24 encodes decorin binding protein A (DbpA),
where the gene is cotranscribed with
bba25 (DbpB). Both are
lipoproteins
that have been shown by Western blot analysis to bind
decorin
(
16,
17). Gene
bbk01 is a member of gene
family 12, which
consists of four additional genes. One of these genes,
bbg01,
is found on lp28-2 and shares >94% sequence
identity at the nucleotide
level with
bbk01. Even though the
proteins encoded by
bbk01 and
bbg01 share 87.9%
identity, they are easily distinguished from
each other by MALDI-TOF
analysis.
Comparison of B. burgdorferi TM samples from pH 7.0 and
8.0 probed with polyclonal sera to P35, DbpA, and DbpB.
In order
to verify the validity of the MALDI-TOF analysis, TM proteins from
cultures incubated at pH 7.0 and 8.0 were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and probed with polyclonal antibodies to P35, DbpA, and DbpB (Fig.
2). The anti-P35 polyclonal serum reacted
strongly to a band with an approximate molecular mass of 35 kDa (Fig.
2A) that was present in the pH 7.0 lane but undetectable in the pH 8.0 lane. Similarly, anti-DbpA and anti-DbpB strongly recognized bands of
the appropriate molecular masses that were again present in greater
amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 2B and C). This indicated that
MALDI-TOF analysis could reliably identify proteins differentially
expressed as a result of the altered pH.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Immunoblots of equivalent amounts (30 µg per lane) of
total membrane proteins from B. burgdorferi grown at pH 7.0 or 8.0 and probed with polyclonal sera to P35 (A), to DbpA (B), and to
DbpB (C). The arrow in each panel indicates the presence of an
immunoreactive band of the appropriate molecular mass that was detected
in cells grown at pH 7.0 but not in cells grown at pH 8.0. Molecular
mass standards in kilodaltons are indicated on the left.
|
|
Analysis of recombinant clones screened with cross-adsorbed
serum.
In addition to MALDI-TOF analysis of differentially
expressed proteins, serum cross-adsorbed with cell lysates from
spirochetes grown at pH 8.0 (Fig. 3A) was
used to screen a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library.
Screening of 20,000 plaques of a genomic library yielded only
10 immunoreactive plaques. One recombinant clone, designated 18c,
expressed a 25-kDa protein that reacted strongly with the
cross-adsorbed serum when the cell lysate was probed by immunoblotting
(Fig. 3B). Sequence analysis of the DNA insert and comparison to the
B31 genome sequence (14) indicated that recombinant clone
18c contained a 4.6-kb portion of lp54. This 4.6-kb segment included
six open reading frames (bba34 to bba39), five of
which encode hypothetical proteins and one (bba36) that
encodes a putative lipoprotein of approximately 24.2 kDa in molecular
mass.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Immunoblots of cell lysates from spirochetes grown at pH
7.0 and 8.0 (A), E. coli DH5 recombinant clone 18c with
control (B), and E. coil DH5 transformed with pCR2.1-A36
with control (C) probed with hyperimmune serum cross-adsorbed with cell
lysates from E. coli and B. burgdorferi B31 grown
at pH 8.0. The asterisk indicates the 25-kDa immunoreactive protein
identified as the gene product of bba36. Molecular mass
standards in kilodaltons are indicated on the left.
|
|
We focused on
bba36 for two reasons: (i) by MALDI-TOF
analysis we had identified several pH-regulated lipoproteins, and (ii)
the apparent molecular mass of the
bba36 product (24.2 kDa)
was
extremely similar to that of the heterologous protein produced
by
clone 18c (25 kDa). Gene
bba36 along with 280 nt upstream of
the first codon was amplified by PCR from clone 18c and TA cloned
into
pCR2.1-TOPO. The resultant construct expressed a heterologous
protein
that was immunoreactive with cross-adsorbed serum and
was identical in
molecular mass to the protein observed in clone
18c (Fig.
3B and C).
This confirmed that gene
bba36 encoded the
immunoreactive
25-kDa protein observed with the cross-adsorbed
serum by
immunoblotting.
Northern analysis of pH-regulated genes.
Probes specific for
pH-regulated genes indirectly identified by MALDI-TOF analysis were
hybridized with total RNA extracted from B. burgdorferi B31
grown in medium at pH 7.0 or pH 8.0 (Fig. 4). Transcripts of all genes appeared to
be increased in abundance in RNA isolated from cultures at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. Probes specific for bba66, bba24, and
bbk01 strongly hybridized with mRNA bands of the expected
size, and by densitometry they were found to be expressed >16-fold
higher at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 4 and Table
3). Similar results were obtained when
mRNA was hybridized with a probe specific for bba25 (data
not shown), indicating bba24 and bba25 were
cotranscribed in our strain. Probes specific for bba03, bba64,
bbe31, and bbj41 also hybridized with mRNA bands of the
appropriate size, but they showed only a two- to fivefold decrease in
expression at 8.0 relative to pH 7.0 (Fig. 4 and Table 3).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Northern analysis of pH-regulated genes. Equivalent
amounts of total RNA from B. burgdorferi B31 grown at pH 7.0 or 8.0 were separated, transferred to membranes, and hybridized with
radiolabeled DNA probes specific for pH-regulated genes. The asterisk
indicates that this probe will also hybridize to bbi39.
Hybridization with an ospAB Northern probe served to ensure
that equal RNA amounts were loaded per lane. RNA size markers in
kilobases are on the left.
|
|
The expression of
bba36, which was identified by
cross-adsorbed serum, was also observed to be transcriptionally
regulated
and by densitometry was expressed approximately ninefold
higher
at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig.
4 and Table
3). Because four of
the six pH-regulated genes identified by MALDI-TOF analysis were
members of paralogous gene family 54 or 60, the pH regulation
of other
members of these families was assessed by Northern blot
analysis. Two
additional pH-regulated loci (
bba65 and
bba73)
were
identified by this method. Genes
bba65 and
bba73, both members
of paralogous gene family 54, were
expressed at >23- and >12-fold
higher levels, respectively, at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig.
4 and Table
3). A probe specific for
ospAB, which is not regulated
by pH, displayed no
significant difference in expression at pH
7.0 and 8.0 (Fig.
4 and
Table
3) and served as a control to ensure
that equivalent RNA amounts
were
loaded.
Computer analysis of the 5' flanking sequences upstream of
pH-regulated loci.
With the exception of bba24 and
bba25, the pH-regulated genes identified in this study were
all monocistronic as determined by Northern analysis (Fig. 4). We
analyzed the regions 200 nt upstream of the first codon of each gene
using Lasergene software in order to gain a better understanding of how
these particular genes may be regulated. With multiple-sequence
alignments of these upstream regions analyzed by the Clustal method, we
observed no significant homologies among the 11 pH-regulated loci. Even
the sequences upstream of the pH-regulated genes of paralogous family 54 that localize to lp54 (bba64, bba65, bba66, and
bba73) displayed little similarity to one another. For
example, the 200 nt 5' of bba64 and bba65 share
the greatest identity, at 44.3%, where a comparison of the same region
upstream of bba64 and bba73 revealed the lowest
sequence identity, at only 29.6%. Interestingly, many of the upstream
sequences contained regions of dyad symmetry ranging from 12 to 25 nt
in length (Table 4). We could not discern
a suitable regulator consensus sequence by comparison of the dyads but
presumed that these regions could be involved in the positive or
negative control of these genes in response to the environmental pH.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We reported in an earlier study that there are numerous
alterations in the membrane protein profile of B. burgdorferi B31 when grown in BSK-H medium at pH 7.0 (the pH of
mammals) compared to pH 8.0 (the pH of ticks) (5). Thus far
we have identified 11 genes located on linear plasmids in B. burgdorferi B31 that are transcribed in larger amounts by
spirochetes grown at pH 7.0 than by those grown at pH 8.0. Seven of the
11 genes (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39,
and bbk01) were identified by MALDI-TOF analysis of membrane
proteins separated by 2D-NEPHGE (Fig. 1 and Table 2), while
immunoblotting confirmed that DbpB (encoded by bba25) was
regulated by pH as well. A ninth gene, bba36, was identified
by screening a B. burgdorferi B31 genomic library
with cross-adsorbed serum that had been enriched to recognize immunogens expressed at pH 7.0 (Fig. 3). Lastly, two genes
(bba65 and bba73) were identified by Northern
blot analysis alone (Fig. 4).
MALDI-TOF analysis and Northern blotting suggested that five members of
paralogous gene family 54 (bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, and
bbj41/bbi39) were differentially expressed as the pH of the medium was altered from 7.0 to 8.0. Paralogous gene family 54 is
composed of one pseudogene and 13 paralogs, most of which are defined as hypothetical proteins with unknown function (14). One gene in particular, bba64, encodes the
well-characterized lipoprotein P35 (3, 15, 22). P35, an
immunogen often associated with early Lyme disease (10, 15),
was previously observed to be synthesized in larger amounts as the
culture cell density increased, and the control of its expression has
been attributed to the growth phase of the organism (21,
22). We have found that spirochetes inoculated to the same cell
density from a single starter culture into medium at either pH 7.0 or
8.0 displayed no apparent change in growth rate, but when cells from
both culture conditions were harvested during the same phase of growth
(mid-log phase), P35 was detectable in cultures grown at pH 7.0 but not in cultures grown at pH 8.0 (Fig. 2). These experiments strongly suggest that the increase in P35 in stationary-phase cultures (22) may actually be a response to the acidification of the medium, which occurs in standard BSK-H medium as cells enter late log
and stationary phases. We have eliminated this pH change due to growth
by adding 25 mM HEPES to the medium to allow for increased buffering
capacity as the cell density increases.
Northern blots indicated that the seven genes identified by MALDI-TOF
analysis (bba03, bba24, bba64, bba66, bbe31, bbj41/bbi39, and bbk01), four of which are members of gene families 54 and 60, were most likely regulated at the level of transcription. Transcripts of these genes were observed in larger amounts at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0 (Fig. 4). This led to subsequent analysis of other
members of paralogous gene families 54 and 60 by Northern blotting.
Hence, we identified two additional members of paralogous gene family
54, bba65 and bba73, that were regulated by the
in vitro environmental pH (Fig. 4). Interestingly, bba64,
bba65, and bba66 were recently observed by Anguita et
al. to be up-regulated in mice infected with a clonal isolate of
B. burgdorferi N40 (cN40) (1). More importantly,
a high-passage isolate of cN40 which was found to have lost the ability
to up-regulate these genes during infection also lacked the ability to
cause disease in the C3H/HeN mouse model (1). We determined
that bba64, bba65, and bba66 were up-regulated at
pH 7.0 (consistent with expression in the mammalian environment) yet
down-regulated at pH 8.0 (similar to the tick vector environment),
suggesting that pH-regulated genes may play a role in adaptation and/or
in the manifestation of disease within the mammalian host.
Similar to some members of paralogous gene family 54, DbpA and -B are
expressed during mammalian infection and elicit high antibody titers
with low-dose inocula of cultured spirochetes (7, 11, 18,
19), but researchers have shown that immunization with DbpA, but
not DbpB, confers protection in mice challenged by a needle inoculm
(11, 19). By MALDI-TOF, immunoblot, and Northern blot
analyses we were able to determine that DbpA and -B (products of
bba24 and bba25, respectively) were up-regulated at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0. DbpA and -B appear to localize to the
outer surface of the cell (16, 18) and are in a bicistronic operon encoded on lp48 in B. burgdorferi N40 (11)
but on lp56 in B. burgdorferi B31 (14). Recent
evidence suggests that hyperimmune DbpA antiserum is bactericidal in
vitro and is effective against a large number of diverse B. burgdorferi isolates. These data indicate a conserved protective
epitope within DbpA and have made this immunogenic lipoprotein an
attractive alternative vaccine candidate (30).
Interestingly, DbpA and -B appear to be coordinately regulated by pH
and temperature (7, 33). These observations highlight the
importance of the effects of pH and temperature on differential
expression in B. burgdorferi and adaptation to the mammalian host.
In concert with MALDI-TOF analysis, a genomic library was
screened with cross-adsorbed serum that reacted primarily with
immunogens expressed at pH 7.0 and not at pH 8.0 (Fig. 3A). Using this
method, we were able to identify an additional pH-regulated gene,
bba36. By Northern blot analysis we observed that
bba36 was expressed at a ninefold higher level at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0, and we have evidence that this gene is under the
coordinate regulation of temperature and pH (not shown), similar to the
case for ospC (5). Gene bba36, like
the other pH-regulated genes described in this study, is located on a
linear plasmid. However, we have preliminary data that suggest that not
all pH-regulated genes are found on linear plasmids and that some may
map to circular plasmids (like ospC) and to the chromosome
as well (not shown).
Ten of the 11 pH-regulated genes that we have identified either encode
or are predicted to encode lipoproteins, yet bbk01 seems to
be the exception. Gene bbk01 encodes a protein (BBK01) with
an estimated molecular mass of 34 kDa and is one of five genes that
make up paralogous gene family 12. BBK01 (spot S-7) was originally
identified as a membrane protein (Fig. 1) (5), and a search
of the predicted amino acid sequence using a dense alignment surface
algorithm (9) identified a putative transmembrane segment at
the N terminus, suggesting that BBK01 is an integral membrane protein.
The proteins encoded by the remaining members of this gene family
(bbg01, bbh37, bbj08, and bb0844) appear to have
similar transmembrane motifs, but the extent of their regulation by pH
has not been determined.
It was apparent by Northern blot analysis that the degrees of pH
regulation observed among the genes identified in this study differed
significantly (Fig. 4). Some were highly up-regulated (i.e.
bba65), others displayed only moderate up-regulation (e.g., bbe31), and a few presented with a lower level of
up-regulation (e.g., bbj41) at pH 7.0 compared to pH 8.0 (Fig. 4 and Table 3). We were curious if any features indicative of
regulatory regions could be found upstream of these pH-regulated loci,
and if so, how similar were these regions. Computer analysis of
approximately 200 nt 5' to these genes demonstrated that the regions
upstream were quite dissimilar even among paralogous genes. This is
different from what has been observed for the erp genes,
where the regions 5' to the erp genes share greater than
80% identity (35). We did determine that upstream of
bba03, bba25, bba64, bba65, bba66, bba73, and
bbe31 were regions of dyad symmetry that ranged from 12 to
25 nt in length. Furthermore, upstream of bba25 and
bba64 were two dyads (Table 4).
Not all of the pH-regulated genes we observed had dyad repeats
upstream. In other genes, like bbk01 and ospC, we
noticed large inverted repeats, and upstream of bba36 we
identified an overlapping direct repeat of 22 nt in length. We could
not readily identify any similar features 5' to bbj41, but
we did find an inverted repeat 5' to bbi39. Not
surprisingly, bbj41/bbi39 displayed the least difference in
the amount of transcript between pH 7.0 and 8.0 (Fig. 4). The role that
these features may play in the pH regulation of these genes remains to
be determined, but their location just upstream of these pH-regulated
genes warrants further investigation.
We have identified in B. burgdorferi B31 11 genes located on
linear plasmids that are regulated by the environmental pH, where transcript was more abundant at pH 7.0 than at pH 8.0. Understanding how these and other genes are regulated by environmental cues, such as
pH and temperature, will aid in elucidating how this spirochete adapts
to the changing environments of the tick vector and the mammalian host.
These adaptations that occur as the bacteria are passed from vector to
host are likely to be vital in allowing the organism to invade, infect,
and cause disease in susceptible hosts. The role that these 11 pH-regulated loci play in the disease process remains to be determined,
but considering the recent advancements in Borrelia genetics
(2), the resolution of their function in pathogenesis is approaching.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank P. Rosa, T. Schwan, P. Stewart, and J. Bono for
comments on the manuscript; G. Hettrick and A. Mora for artwork and photography; and R. Gilmore for antibodies to P35.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: 903 South 4th
St., Hamilton, MT 59840. Phone: (406)363-9407. Fax: (406) 363-9371. E-mail: jcarroll{at}niaid.nih.gov.
Editor:
D. L. Burns
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Anguita, J.,
S. Samanta,
B. Revilla,
K. Suk,
S. Das,
S. W. Barthold, and E. Fikrig.
2000.
Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression in vivo and spirochete pathogenicity.
Infect. Immun.
68:1222-1230[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bono, J. L.,
A. F. Elias,
J. J. Kupko III,
B. Stevenson,
K. Tilly, and P. Rosa.
2000.
Efficient targeted mutagenesis in Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2445-2452[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Brunet, L. R.,
C. Sellitto,
A. Spielman, and S. R. Telford, III.
1995.
Antibody response of the mouse reservoir of Borrelia burgdorferi in nature.
Infect. Immun.
63:3030-3036[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Burgdorfer, W.,
A. G. Barbour,
S. F. Hayes,
J. L. Benach,
E. Grunwaldt, and J. P. Davis.
1982.
Lyme disease a tick borne spirochetosis?
Science
216:1317-1319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Carroll, J. A.,
C. F. Garon, and T. G. Schwan.
1999.
Effects of environmental pH on membrane proteins in Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
67:3181-3187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Carroll, J. A., and F. C. Gherardini.
1996.
Membrane protein variations associated with in vitro passage of Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
64:392-398[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Cassatt, D. R.,
N. K. Patel,
N. D. Ulbrandt, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
DbpA, but not OspA, is expressed by Borrelia burgdorferi during spirochetemia and is a target for protective antibodies.
Infect. Immun.
66:5379-5387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Champion, C. I.,
D. R. Blanco,
J. T. Skare,
D. A. Haake,
M. Giladi,
D. Foley,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1994.
A 9.0-kilobase-pair circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferi encodes an exported protein: evidence for expression only during infection.
Infect. Immun.
62:2653-2661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cserzo, M.,
E. Wallin,
I. Simon,
G. von Heijne, and A. Elofsson.
1997.
Prediction of transmembrane alpha-helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: the dense alignment surface method.
Protein Eng.
10:673-676[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Engstrom, S. M.,
E. Shoop, and R. C. Johnson.
1995.
Immunoblot interpretation criteria for serodiagnosis of early Lyme disease.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:419-427[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Feng, S.,
E. Hodzic,
B. Stevenson, and S. W. Barthold.
1998.
Humoral immunity to Borrelia burgdorferi N40 decorin binding proteins during infection of laboratory mice.
Infect. Immun.
66:2827-2835[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Fikrig, E.,
W. Feng,
J. Aversa,
R. T. Schoen, and R. A. Flavell.
1998.
Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi genes during erythema migrans and Lyme arthritis.
J. Infect. Dis.
178:1198-1201[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Fingerle, V.,
U. Hauser,
G. Liegl,
B. Petko,
V. Preac-Mursic, and B. Wilske.
1995.
Expression of outer surface proteins A and C of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1867-1869[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Fraser, C. M.,
S. Casjens,
W. M. Huang,
G. G. Sutton,
R. Clayton,
R. Lathigra,
O. White,
K. A. Ketchum,
R. Dodson,
E. K. Hickey,
M. Gwinn,
B. Dougherty,
J. F. Tomb,
R. D. Fleischmann,
D. Richardson,
J. Peterson,
A. R. Kerlavage,
J. Quackenbush,
S. Salzberg,
M. Hanson,
R. van Vugt,
N. Palmer,
M. D. Adams,
J. Gocayne,
J. C. Venter, et al.
1997.
Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi.
Nature
390:580-586[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gilmore, R. D., Jr.,
K. J. Kappel, and B. J. Johnson.
1997.
Molecular characterization of a 35-kilodalton protein of Borrelia burgdorferi, an antigen of diagnostic importance in early Lyme disease.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:86-91[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Guo, B. P.,
E. L. Brown,
D. W. Dorward,
L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook.
1998.
Decorin-binding adhesins from Borrelia burgdorferi.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:711-723[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Guo, B. P.,
S. J. Norris,
L. C. Rosenberg, and M. Hook.
1995.
Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi to the proteoglycan decorin.
Infect. Immun.
63:3467-3472[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Hagman, K. E.,
P. Lahdenne,
T. G. Popova,
S. F. Porcella,
D. R. Akins,
J. D. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1998.
Decorin-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi is encoded within a two-gene operon and is protective in the murine model of Lyme borreliosis.
Infect. Immun.
66:2674-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hanson, M. S.,
D. R. Cassatt,
B. P. Guo,
N. K. Patel,
M. P. McCarthy,
D. W. Dorward, and M. Hook.
1998.
Active and passive immunity against Borrelia burgdorferi decorin binding protein A (DbpA) protects against infection.
Infect. Immun.
66:2143-2153[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hofmeister, E. K., and J. E. Childs.
1995.
Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi sequentially isolated from Peromyscus leucopus captured at a Lyme disease enzootic site.
J. Infect. Dis.
172:462-469[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Indest, K. J., and M. T. Philipp.
2000.
DNA-binding proteins possibly involved in regulation of the post-logarithmic-phase expression of lipoprotein P35 in Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Bacteriol.
182:522-525[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Indest, K. J.,
R. Ramamoorthy,
M. Sole,
R. D. Gilmore,
B. J. Johnson, and M. T. Philipp.
1997.
Cell-density-dependent expression of Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
65:1165-1171[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Johnson, R. C.,
N. Marek, and C. Kodner.
1984.
Infection of Syrian hamsters with Lyme disease spirochetes, J.
Clin. Microbiol.
20:1099-1101.
|
| 24.
|
Leuba-Garcia, S.,
R. Martinez, and L. Gern.
1998.
Expression of outer surface proteins A and C of Borrelia afzelii in Ixodes ricinus ticks and in the skin of mice.
Zentbl. Bakteriol.
287:475-484.
|
| 25.
|
Markwell, M. A.,
S. M. Haas,
L. L. Bieber, and N. E. Tolbert.
1978.
A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples.
Anal. Biochem.
87:206-210[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Marmur, J.
1961.
A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms.
J. Mol. Biol.
3:208-218.
|
| 27.
|
Oschmann, P.,
H. J. Wellensiek,
W. Zhong,
W. Dorndorf, and K. W. Pflughaupt.
1997.
Relationship between the Borrelia burgdorferi specific immune response and different stages and syndromes in neuroborreliosis.
Infection
25:292-297[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Pappin, D. J. C.,
P. Hojrup, and A. J. Bleasby.
1993.
Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting.
Curr. Biol.
3:327-332[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ramamoorthy, R., and M. T. Philipp.
1998.
Differential expression of Borrelia burgdorferi proteins during growth in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
66:5119-5124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Roberts, W. C.,
B. A. Mullikin,
R. Lathigra, and M. S. Hanson.
1998.
Molecular analysis of sequence heterogeneity among genes encoding decorin binding proteins A and B of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato.
Infect. Immun.
66:5275-5285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Schwan, T. G.,
J. Piesman,
W. T. Golde,
M. C. Dolan, and P. A. Rosa.
1995.
Induction of an outer surface protein on Borrelia burgdorferi during tick feeding.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:2909-2913[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Seinost, G.,
D. E. Dykhuizen,
R. J. Dattwyler,
W. T. Golde,
J. J. Dunn,
I. N. Wang,
G. P. Wormser,
M. E. Schriefer, and B. J. Luft.
1999.
Four clones of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto cause invasive infection in humans.
Infect. Immun.
67:3518-3524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Skare, J. T.,
D. M. Foley,
S. R. Hernandez,
D. C. Moore,
D. R. Blanco,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1999.
Cloning and molecular characterization of plasmid-encoded antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
67:4407-4417[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Stevenson, B.,
T. G. Schwan, and P. A. Rosa.
1995.
Temperature-related differential expression of antigens in the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
63:4535-4539[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Stevenson, B.,
K. Tilly, and P. A. Rosa.
1996.
A family of genes located on four separate 32-kilobase circular plasmids in Borrelia burgdorferi B31.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3508-3516[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Suk, K.,
S. Das,
W. Sun,
B. Jwang,
S. W. Barthold,
R. A. Flavell, and E. Fikrig.
1995.
Borrelia burgdorferi genes selectively expressed in the infected host.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4269-4273[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Towbin, H.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Wallich, R.,
C. Brenner,
M. D. Kramer, and M. M. Simon.
1995.
Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel linear-plasmid-encoded gene, pG, of Borrelia burgdorferi expressed only in vivo.
Infect. Immun.
63:3327-3335[Abstract].
|
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6677-6684, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sanjuan, E., Esteve-Gassent, M. D., Maruskova, M., Seshu, J.
(2009). Overexpression of CsrA (BB0184) Alters the Morphology and Antigen Profiles of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun.
77: 5149-5162
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mulay, V. B., Caimano, M. J., Iyer, R., Dunham-Ems, S., Liveris, D., Petzke, M. M., Schwartz, I., Radolf, J. D.
(2009). Borrelia burgdorferi bba74 Is Expressed Exclusively during Tick Feeding and Is Regulated by Both Arthropod- and Mammalian Host-Specific Signals. J. Bacteriol.
191: 2783-2794
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maruskova, M., Seshu, J.
(2008). Deletion of BBA64, BBA65, and BBA66 Loci Does Not Alter the Infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi in the Murine Model of Lyme Disease. Infect. Immun.
76: 5274-5284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, X. F., Goldberg, M. S., He, M., Xu, H., Blevins, J. S., Norgard, M. V.
(2008). Differential Expression of a Putative CarD-Like Transcriptional Regulator, LtpA, in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun.
76: 4439-4444
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hughes, J. L., Nolder, C. L., Nowalk, A. J., Clifton, D. R., Howison, R. R., Schmit, V. L., Gilmore, R. D. Jr., Carroll, J. A.
(2008). Borrelia burgdorferi Surface-Localized Proteins Expressed during Persistent Murine Infection Are Conserved among Diverse Borrelia spp.. Infect. Immun.
76: 2498-2511
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gautam, A., Hathaway, M., McClain, N., Ramesh, G., Ramamoorthy, R.
(2008). Analysis of the determinants of bba64 (P35) gene expression in Borrelia burgdorferi using a gfp reporter. Microbiology
154: 275-285
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Livengood, J. A., Schmit, V. L., Gilmore, R. D. Jr.
(2008). Global Transcriptome Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi during Association with Human Neuroglial Cells. Infect. Immun.
76: 298-307
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maruskova, M., Esteve-Gassent, M. D., Sexton, V. L., Seshu, J.
(2008). Role of the BBA64 Locus of Borrelia burgdorferi in Early Stages of Infectivity in a Murine Model of Lyme Disease. Infect. Immun.
76: 391-402
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, M., Boardman, B. K., Yan, D., Yang, X. F.
(2007). Regulation of Expression of the Fibronectin-Binding Protein BBK32 in Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Bacteriol.
189: 8377-8380
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bykowski, T., Woodman, M. E., Cooley, A. E., Brissette, C. A., Brade, V., Wallich, R., Kraiczy, P., Stevenson, B.
(2007). Coordinated Expression of Borrelia burgdorferi Complement Regulator-Acquiring Surface Proteins during the Lyme Disease Spirochete's Mammal-Tick Infection Cycle. Infect. Immun.
75: 4227-4236
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gilmore, R. D. Jr., Howison, R. R., Schmit, V. L., Nowalk, A. J., Clifton, D. R., Nolder, C., Hughes, J. L., Carroll, J. A.
(2007). Temporal Expression Analysis of the Borrelia burgdorferi Paralogous Gene Family 54 Genes BBA64, BBA65, and BBA66 during Persistent Infection in Mice. Infect. Immun.
75: 2753-2764
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blevins, J. S., Revel, A. T., Smith, A. H., Bachlani, G. N., Norgard, M. V.
(2007). Adaptation of a Luciferase Gene Reporter and lac Expression System to Borrelia burgdorferi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 1501-1513
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hyde, J. A., Trzeciakowski, J. P., Skare, J. T.
(2007). Borrelia burgdorferi Alters Its Gene Expression and Antigenic Profile in Response to CO2 Levels. J. Bacteriol.
189: 437-445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hyde, J. A., Seshu, J., Skare, J. T.
(2006). Transcriptional profiling of Borrelia burgdorferi containing a unique bosR allele identifies a putative oxidative stress regulon.. Microbiology
152: 2599-2609
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nowalk, A. J., Gilmore, R. D. Jr, Carroll, J. A.
(2006). Serologic Proteome Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi Membrane-Associated Proteins. Infect. Immun.
74: 3864-3873
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bykowski, T., Babb, K., von Lackum, K., Riley, S. P., Norris, S. J., Stevenson, B.
(2006). Transcriptional Regulation of the Borrelia burgdorferi Antigenically Variable VlsE Surface Protein. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4879-4889
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stewart, P. E., Wang, X., Bueschel, D. M., Clifton, D. R., Grimm, D., Tilly, K., Carroll, J. A., Weis, J. J., Rosa, P. A.
(2006). Delineating the Requirement for the Borrelia burgdorferi Virulence Factor OspC in the Mammalian Host.. Infect. Immun.
74: 3547-3553
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pinne, M., Denker, K., Nilsson, E., Benz, R., Bergstrom, S.
(2006). The BBA01 Protein, a Member of Paralog Family 48 from Borrelia burgdorferi, Is Potentially Interchangeable with the Channel-Forming Protein P13.. J. Bacteriol.
188: 4207-4217
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Posey, J. E., Shinnick, T. M., Quinn, F. D.
(2006). Characterization of the Twin-Arginine Translocase Secretion System of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Bacteriol.
188: 1332-1340
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Caimano, M. J., Eggers, C. H., Gonzalez, C. A., Radolf, J. D.
(2005). Alternate Sigma Factor RpoS Is Required for the In Vivo-Specific Repression of Borrelia burgdorferi Plasmid lp54-Borne ospA and lp6.6 Genes. J. Bacteriol.
187: 7845-7852
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
von Lackum, K., Miller, J. C., Bykowski, T., Riley, S. P., Woodman, M. E., Brade, V., Kraiczy, P., Stevenson, B., Wallich, R.
(2005). Borrelia burgdorferi Regulates Expression of Complement Regulator-Acquiring Surface Protein 1 during the Mammal-Tick Infection Cycle. Infect. Immun.
73: 7398-7405
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Caimano, M. J., Eggers, C. H., Hazlett, K. R. O., Radolf, J. D.
(2004). RpoS Is Not Central to the General Stress Response in Borrelia burgdorferi but Does Control Expression of One or More Essential Virulence Determinants. Infect. Immun.
72: 6433-6445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tokarz, R., Anderton, J. M., Katona, L. I., Benach, J. L.
(2004). Combined Effects of Blood and Temperature Shift on Borrelia burgdorferi Gene Expression as Determined by Whole Genome DNA Array. Infect. Immun.
72: 5419-5432
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ostberg, Y., Carroll, J. A., Pinne, M., Krum, J. G., Rosa, P., Bergstrom, S.
(2004). Pleiotropic Effects of Inactivating a Carboxyl-Terminal Protease, CtpA, in Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Bacteriol.
186: 2074-2084
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grimm, D., Tilly, K., Byram, R., Stewart, P. E., Krum, J. G., Bueschel, D. M., Schwan, T. G., Policastro, P. F., Elias, A. F., Rosa, P. A.
(2004). Outer-surface protein C of the Lyme disease spirochete: A protein induced in ticks for infection of mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 3142-3147
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Narasimhan, S., Caimano, M. J., Liang, F. T., Santiago, F., Laskowski, M., Philipp, M. T., Pachner, A. R., Radolf, J. D., Fikrig, E.
(2003). Borrelia burgdorferi transcriptome in the central nervous system of non-human primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 15953-15958
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, X. F., Hubner, A., Popova, T. G., Hagman, K. E., Norgard, M. V.
(2003). Regulation of Expression of the Paralogous Mlp Family in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun.
71: 5012-5020
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pikas, D. S., Brown, E. L., Gurusiddappa, S., Lee, L. Y., Xu, Y., Hook, M.
(2003). Decorin-binding Sites in the Adhesin DbpA from Borrelia burgdorferi: A SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE APPROACH. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 30920-30926
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ohnishi, J., Schneider, B., Messer, W. B., Piesman, J., de Silva, A. M.
(2003). Genetic Variation at the vlsE Locus of Borrelia burgdorferi within Ticks and Mice over the Course of a Single Transmission Cycle. J. Bacteriol.
185: 4432-4441
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carroll, J. A., Stewart, P. E., Rosa, P., Elias, A. F., Garon, C. F.
(2003). An enhanced GFP reporter system to monitor gene expression in Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiology
149: 1819-1828
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stevenson, B., Babb, K.
(2002). LuxS-Mediated Quorum Sensing in Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme Disease Spirochete. Infect. Immun.
70: 4099-4105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hodzic, E., Feng, S., Freet, K. J., Borjesson, D. L., Barthold, S. W.
(2002). Borrelia burgdorferi Population Kinetics and Selected Gene Expression at the Host-Vector Interface. Infect. Immun.
70: 3382-3388
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, T., Oliver, J. H. Jr., Gao, L.
(2002). Genetic Diversity of the Outer Surface Protein C Gene of Southern Borrelia Isolates and Its Possible Epidemiological, Clinical, and Pathogenetic Implications. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 2572-2583
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Anguita, J., Thomas, V., Samanta, S., Persinski, R., Hernanz, C., Barthold, S. W., Fikrig, E.
(2001). Borrelia burgdorferi-Induced Inflammation Facilitates Spirochete Adaptation and Variable Major Protein-Like Sequence Locus Recombination. J. Immunol.
167: 3383-3390
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carroll, J. A., El-Hage, N., Miller, J. C., Babb, K., Stevenson, B.
(2001). Borrelia burgdorferi RevA Antigen Is a Surface-Exposed Outer Membrane Protein Whose Expression Is Regulated in Response to Environmental Temperature and pH. Infect. Immun.
69: 5286-5293
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Babb, K., El-Hage, N., Miller, J. C., Carroll, J. A., Stevenson, B.
(2001). Distinct Regulatory Pathways Control Expression of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection-Associated OspC and Erp Surface Proteins. Infect. Immun.
69: 4146-4153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, X., Popova, T. G., Goldberg, M. S., Norgard, M. V.
(2001). Influence of Cultivation Media on Genetic Regulatory Patterns in Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun.
69: 4159-4163
[Abstract]
[Full Text]