Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6712-6719, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Tetracycline-Regulatable System To Tightly Control
Gene Expression in the Pathogenic Fungus Candida
albicans
Hironobu
Nakayama,*
Toshiyuki
Mio,
Shigehisa
Nagahashi,
Michiko
Kokado,
Mikio
Arisawa,
and
Yuko
Aoki
Department of Mycology, Nippon Roche K. K. Research Center, 200 Kajiwara, Kamakura, Kanagawa 247-8530, Japan
Received 27 January 2000/Returned for modification 10 March
2000/Accepted 13 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Conventional tools for elucidating gene function are relatively
scarce in Candida albicans, the most prevalent human fungal pathogen. To this end, we developed a convenient system to control gene
expression in C. albicans by the tetracycline-regulatable (TR) promoters. When the sea pansy Renilla reniformis
luciferase gene (RLUC1) was placed under the control of
this system, doxycycline (DOX) inhibited the luciferase activity almost
completely. In the absence of DOX, the RLUC1 gene was
induced to express luciferase at a level 400- to 1,000-fold higher
than that in the presence of DOX. The same results were obtained in
hypha-forming cells. The replacement of
N-myristoyltransferase or translation elongation factor 3 promoters with TR promoters conferred a DOX-dependent growth defect in
culture media. Furthermore, all the mice infected with these
mutants, which are still virulent, survived following DOX
administration. Consistently, we observed that the number of these
mutant cells recovered from the mouse kidneys was significantly reduced
following DOX administration. Thus, this system is useful for
investigating gene functions, since this system is able to function in
both in vitro and in vivo settings.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Candida albicans is the
most important opportunistic fungal pathogen of humans. In recent
years, the incidence of candidiasis has been increasing, particularly
among patients with immune systems compromised by human
immunodeficiency virus infection, organ transplantation, and/or
chemotherapy for cancer (18). Current therapies for treating systemic fungal infection have limited effectiveness and have created
problems of adverse reactions and drug resistance (3, 19).
Therefore, the search for novel antifungal drugs has been carried out.
The C. albicans genome-sequencing project has recently begun
(11), and many novel genes are being identified. Therefore, there should be increasing demands to assess gene function by genetic
approaches. To date, it has been difficult to apply conventional approaches to C. albicans because of its diploid genome and
because of difficulty in generating haploid strains. Integrative
transformation of C. albicans through homologous
recombination has made gene disruption possible (1, 10).
Such studies are impossible, however, if the ablated genes are
essential for cell growth. To overcome these issues, the development of
convenient genetic tools, such as a gene expression system, is needed.
The tetracycline-regulatable (TR) expression system is a popular gene
expression system among eukaryotic cells (6, 7, 16, 17).
This system consists of two components: one is a TR transactivator, a
fusion protein of the Escherichia coli tetracyline repressor
protein (TetR) and the activation domain of transcriptional activators,
such as VP16, Gal4p, and Hap4p (7, 16). The other is a TR
promoter, comprising a minimal promoter element with a tetracycline
operator sequence (tetO). The system is based on the
molecular mechanism of tetR in association with
tetO, which is well characterized in E. coli as a
tetracyline-resistant gene expression machinery on the Tn10
transposon (8). In the absence of tetracycline,
tetR can specifically bind tetO as a dimer.
However, their dissociation is rapid in the presence of tetracycline
since tetR dimerization is inhibited by this small compound
possessing a high binding constant with tetR
(6). Therefore, gene expression under this system can
be actively expressed in the absence of tetracycline by the
binding of the TR transactivator to tetO, and it can
be repressed by adding tetracycline, which inhibits such binding.
Compared with the alternative systems for controlling gene expression
in eukaryotes, the TR expression system has distinct advantages; it is
highly specific, nontoxic, and noneukaryotic and is consequently
expected to have no pleiotropic effect on host cell genes (6,
7). When applied to pathogenic fungi, it could also function in
cells infecting an animal host (17).
Here we report the establishment of a TR expression system in C. albicans. This system enables tight repression and highfold induction of gene expression in both in vivo and in vitro settings. Our
results suggest that this system is a powerful tool for functional analyses of C. albicans genes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and growth media.
E. coli DH5
was used
as the host strain for all plasmid preparations, and was grown in
Luria-Bertani medium. All of the C. albicans strains used in
this study (Table 1) were cultivated at
30°C in YEPD (1% [wt/vol] yeast extract, 2% [wt/vol] Bacto Peptone, and 2% [wt/vol] glucose). YEPGlcNAc (1% [wt/vol] yeast extract, 2% [wt/vol] Bacto Peptone, and 2% [wt/vol]
N-acetylglucosamine) or RPMI 1640 (Sigma) was used for
induction of hyphal formation. YNB (0.67% [wt/vol] yeast nitrogen
base, 2% [wt/vol] glucose, and supplement for auxotrophic
requirement) was used for selective medium after transformation
(9).
Plasmid construction.
Primers and linkers used in this study
are listed in Table 2.
Plasmid pCAITHE5 (Fig. 1B), which harbors
the gene encoding the fusion transactivator, tetR-ScHAP4AD
(16), was constructed as follows.
tetR-ScHAP4AD was introduced into
PstI/XhoI sites of pCRW3 (21) after we
replaced all four CUG codons with other leucine codons by PCR-mediated
mutagenesis (Table 2). This mutagenesis was completed by connecting six
fragments. The N-terminal portion of
tetR-ScHAP4AD was generated by annealing synthetic
oligonucleotides TETRFL and TETRRL. The other five fragments were
amplified by PCR using primer pairs TETRF-TETRR, HAP401F-HAP401R,
HAP402F-HAP402R, HAP403F-HAP403R, or HAP404F-HAP404R, and then they
were digested with appropriated endonucleases (Fig. 1A). To express the
gene in C. albicans, the CaENO1 promoter region
(nucleotides [nt]
528 to
6), which was amplified by PCR with the
primers PCAENO1F and PCAENO1R, was introduced into the
ClaI/PstI site of pCRW3. To confirm the
expression of tetR-ScHAP4AD, the triplet of the
hemagglutinin (3×HA) epitope, which was generated by annealing HAFL
and HARL, was introduced into the C-terminal of
tetR-ScHAP4AD (XhoI/ApaI site).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of plasmid constructions and
the TR promoters 97t, 98t, and 99t. (A) Schematic representation of the
construction of the tetR-ScHAP4AD fragment. The hatched box
shows the fragment generated by annealing synthetic oligonucleotides.
The gray boxes show the fragments amplified by PCR. The asterisks
indicate the mutation points. HindIII+,
HindIII site was disrupted by connecting fragments. (B)
Restriction map of plasmid pCAITHE5 which harbors the gene for the TR
transactivator tetR-ScHAP4AD. (C) Schematic representation
of the TR promoters 97t, 98t, and 99t (16, 17).
tADH is the termination sequence of ScADH1.
Hatched boxes show derivatives of the ScHOP1 promoter. (D)
Restriction enzyme map of the reporter plasmids p97RLU, p98RLU, and
p99RLU, in which the RLUC1 gene is connected with TR
promoters. (E) Restriction enzyme map of p97CAU, p98CAU, and p99CAU, in
which the URA3 gene and TR promoters are located on the
multicloning site on pBluescript SK II(+). These plasmids are utilized
to prepare fragments that are used for replacing the endogenous
promoter with TR promoters.
|
|
Reporter plasmids p97RLU, p98RLU, and p99RLU (Fig. 1D) were constructed
by introducing the URA3 gene, the ADE2 gene, the
TR promoter, and the RLUC1 gene into pUC18. The
URA3 gene was excised as a 1.3-kb fragment from pCA1U
(14). The ADE2 gene and the RLUC1 gene
were prepared from pCRW3 as a 2.4-kb fragment and as a 1-kb fragment,
respectively. The TR promoters 97t, 98t, and 99t consist of 350 bp of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH1 terminator (tADH), tetO, and S. cerevisiae HOP1
promoter derivatives (Fig. 1C; references 16 and
17) generated by PCR with primers TADH101 and HOP102SAL.
Two plasmids, pTEFD11 and pNMTD1, for disrupting TEF3 or
NMT1 were generated as follows. The TEF3 and
NMT1 genes were amplified by PCR with primer pairs
TEFAF-TEFDBR or NMTAF-3SPH. These genes were cloned once into pCR2.1
(Invitrogen), and then their internal-regions, the 2.8-kb
NspV fragment of TEF3 and the 1.1-kb
MunI fragment of NMT1, were respectively replaced
with the hisG-URA3-hisG module, which was excised from pCA1U
(14).
Three plasmids, p97CAU, p98CAU, and p99CAU, were generated by
introducing a 1.3-kb fragment from pCA1U containing the URA3 gene and 0.6-kb PCR-generated SmaI/SpeI fragments
containing TR promoters (97t, 98t, or 99t) into pBluescript SK II(+).
The SmaI/SpeI fragments were amplified by PCR
with the primers TADH101 and HOP101 from p97CGH, p98CGH, and
p99CGH (17).
Six plasmids, p97TEF3, p98TEF3, p99TEF3, p97NMT1, p98NMT1,
and p99NMT1, were constructed by introducing the 5'-flanking
region (region A) and the 5' portion of the coding region (region B) of
TEF3 or NMT1 into the
KpnI/SalI site (for region A's) and into the
SpeI/NotI site (for region B's) of p97CAU,
p98CAU, and p99CAU (Fig. 1E). Region A (nt
726 to
369) or region B
(nt
6 to 367) of TEF3 was also amplified by PCR with
primer pairs TEFAF-TEFAR or TEFBF-TEFBRN, respectively. Region A (nt
113 to
17) or region B (nt
6 to 411) of NMT1 was
amplified by PCR with primer pairs NMTAF-NMTAR or NMTBF-NMTBRN, respectively.
Generation of test strains and transactivator-expressing
strain.
Yeast transformations were carried out by the lithium
acetate method (9). In all generated strains, the correct
integrations of the prepared fragments on the target locus were
confirmed by Southern blot and PCR analyses (data not shown).
The gene-encoding TR transactivator, TetR-ScHAP4AD, was introduced into
ENO1 locus in CAI8 (4) by transforming with
pCAITHE5 that was linearized with AccI. Strain THE1 was obtained.
Reporter strains 97RL, 98RL, and 99RL that contain the RLUC1
gene on their ADE2 loci were obtained by transforming THE1
with p97RLU, p98RLU, and p99RLU after linearization with
EcoT22I.
A scheme for creating TEF3- or NMT1-controllable
strains is shown in Fig. 2. Gene
disruptions to generate the heterozygous strains were carried out
according to the ura blaster method (1). THE1 was
transformed with the NotI/SpeI fragment of
pTEFD11 or the XhoI/SpeI fragment of pNMTD1,
yielding strains HUTEF3 and HUNMT1, respectively. Subsequently,
both HUTEF3 and HUNMT1 cells were plated onto YNB plates containing
5-fluoroorotic acid (Wako), yielding their uracil auxotrophs, HTEF3 and
HNMT1. To replace the endogenous promoters with the TR promoter in
HTEF3 and HNMT1, the plasmids p97TEF3, p98TEF3, p99TEF3, p97NMT1,
p98NMT1, and p99NMT1 were digested with
KpnI/SacII and used to transform HTEF3 or HNMT1,
yielding strains 97ATEF3, 98ATEF3, 99ATEF3, 97ANMT1, 98ANMT1, and
99ANMT1.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Schematic representation of
construction of controllable strains. TG, target gene; step 1, disruption of one allele of TG by the ura blaster method
(1). Step 2, replacement of endogenous promoters on another allele with
TR promoters (Fig. 1C) by homologous recombination. Fragments used for
this step were prepared from the plasmids generated by introducing the
5'-flanking region and 5' portion of the open reading frame of the
target gene into p97CAU1, p98CAU1, or p99CAU1 (see Fig. 1E).
|
|
Western blot analysis.
Cells were harvested after
cultivation for 14 h in YEPD containing 0 or 20 µg of
doxycycline (DOX) per ml. After the cells were disrupted with glass
beads in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), soluble fractions were prepared
by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The
protein concentration of each supernatant was determined using a
bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce). Ten micrograms of each
sample was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis on a 4 to 20% polyacrylamide gel, and the separated
protein fractions were blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane filter. The filter was blocked for 1 h at room
temperature in PBS containing 5% (wt/vol) skim milk (Difco). The
filter was incubated with an anti-HA mouse monoclonal antibody (Roche
Diagnostics) diluted 1:1,000 for 1 h at 37°C. Then the filter
was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse
immunoglobulin G antibody (Amersham-Pharmacia) diluted 1:5,000 for 30 min at 37°C. According to the manufacturer's instructions, signals
were visualized on an X-ray film (Kodak) using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham-Pharmacia).
Northern blot analysis.
Approximately 107 cells
were inoculated in YEPD and cultivated with or without DOX (20 µg/ml)
for 2 h. Cells were then harvested, and their total RNAs were
prepared using Sepasol solution (Nacalai Tesque) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Ten micrograms of total RNA was separated
on an agarose gel, and the separated RNA fractions were transferred
onto a nylon membrane (Hybond-N; Amersham-Pharmacia). The probe DNAs
used for hybridization were amplified by PCR with primer pair
TEFBF-TEFBRN (for TEF3) or NMT1BF-NMT1BRN (for
NMT1). These DNAs were radiolabeled by the
random-priming method using [
-32P]dCTP. For
normalization, a probe for exon 2 of the ACT1 gene was used.
The hybridization was carried out in hybridization buffer (50%
[vol/vol] formamide, 5× SSC [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M
sodium citrate], 0.1% [wt/vol] SDS, 0.25% [wt/vol] skim milk, and 50 mM sodium phosphate [pH 6.5]) at 42°C for 16 h. After
the membrane was washed with 0.2× SSC at 55°C for 1 h, the
signals were visualized by autoradiography.
Luciferase assay.
After cultivation in the absence or
presence of DOX (20 µg/ml) until the mid-log phase, approximately
2 × 108 cells were harvested and resuspended in RLUC
buffer (500 mM NaCl, 100 mM K2HPO4 [pH 6.7],
1 mM sodium EDTA, 0.6 mM sodium azide, 1 mM PMSF, and 0.02% [wt/vol]
bovine serum albumin) (13). After disruption of the cells,
soluble fractions were prepared by centrifugation and mixed with the
reaction buffer (RLUC buffer containing 0.5 µM coelentrazine
[Molecular Probes, Inc.]). The light emission level of the mixture
was measured at 480 nm for 30 s using a luminometer (Wallac).
Relative light units (RLUs) represent light emitted per 30 s per
microgram of protein.
Systemic infection of mice and quantification of C. albicans in infected tissue.
Male CD-1 mice (4 weeks,
21.5 g) were fed food and water ad libitum throughout the course
of experiment. In the DOX-treated group, mice were administered with
DOX (2 mg/ml) dissolved in 5% sucrose solution as drinking water from
2 days before the inoculation of C. albicans cells. In this
dose regimen, each mouse drank approximately 5 ml of sucrose solution
every day. Results show that the concentrations of DOX in serum, liver,
and kidney were maintained at more than 2 µg/ml of serum, 8 µg/g of
liver, and 10 µg/g of kidney, respectively (17).
Precultured cells were suspended in saline and were counted using a
hemocytometer. The cell suspension (0.2 ml) was inoculated into the
mice intravenously. In each survival experiment, 106 or
107 of C. albicans cells were inoculated into
five or seven mice, respectively. The numbers of surviving mice after
the infection were counted. For each strain, mice were sacrificed 5 or
96 h after inoculation of 107 of C. albicans cells, and their kidneys were removed and homogenized. The homogenates were plated on YEPD plates containing penicillin G (200 U/ml) and streptomycin (200 µg/ml). After 36 h of incubation at
30°C, the numbers of C. albicans colonies were counted.
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of strain expressing a TR transactivator.
We
introduced a TR transactivator into C. albicans. As the
partner of tetR, we used S. cerevisiae HAP4AD
(the activation domain of Hap4p: amino acid positions 330 to 554),
which is well characterized as the minimal region for transcriptional
activation (5) and is known to be functionable in S. cerevisiae (16). To ensure that
tetR-ScHAP4AD functions as a transactivator, all four CUG codons in the gene were replaced with leucine codons (Table 2) to avoid loss of function due to abnormal usage of the CUG codon as
serine in C. albicans (20). To express
tetR-ScHAP4AD in C. albicans, the gene was
introduced under the control of the CaENO1 promoter
(12). After transforming CAI8 (4) with
AccI-linearized pCAITHE5 (Fig. 1B), a
TR-transactivator-expressing strain, THE1, was obtained. To confirm the
expression, we performed Western blot analysis using an antibody
against the HA epitope that was introduced into the C terminus of
tetR-ScHAP4AD. As shown in Fig. 3, the signal at 55 kDa was specifically
detected in THE1, indicating that tetR-ScHAP4AD was
expressed in this strain. Furthermore, the expression of
tetR-ScHAP4AD in THE1 was not affected following the
addition of DOX (lanes 3 and 4).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Detection of expression of tetR-ScHAP4AD. The
3×HA-tagged tetR-ScHAP4AD was expressed in CAI8 cells
(lanes 1 and 2) and THE1 cells (lanes 3 and 4) as an approximately
55-kDa protein (arrow).
|
|
DOX-regulated expression of sea pansy Renilla
reniformis luciferase gene (RLUC1) in C. albicans.
As a reporter gene, the RLUC1 gene (13,
21) was used to characterize transcriptional regulation of the TR
expression system in C. albicans. As TR promoters, we used
the tetO-ScHOP1 promoter derivatives, 97t, 98t, and 99t
(Fig. 1C), because they have varying activity levels and are almost
completely repressed by DOX in S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata (16, 17). In these promoters, the 350-bp
fragment from the ScADH1 terminator (tADH) is
located upstream of tetO, eliminating readthrough from the
promoter-like sequence located upstream of the TR promoters. Reporter
plasmids, p97RLU, p98RLU, and p99RLU (Fig. 1D), were introduced into
the ADE2 locus in THE1, yielding the reporter strains 97RL,
98RL, and 99RL, respectively. When we compared the luciferase activity of each strain in the absence of DOX, each strain showed an apparent luciferase activity at various levels; the highest was observed in 99RL
(Table 3). On the other hand, in the
presence of DOX (20 µg/ml), the luciferase activity levels were
dramatically decreased. These results suggest that the fusion
transactivator, tetR-ScHAP4AD, can promote transcription via
TR promoters in C. albicans and that DOX is able to inhibit
this transcription machinery.
Control of RLUC1 gene by TR promoters in hypha-forming
cells.
C. albicans is known to form both yeast and
hyphal shapes. It is presumed that a dynamic alternation of the gene
expression profile is involved in such morphological changes.
Therefore, we examined whether or not the gene expression driven by
this system is stable in hypha-forming cells. The luciferase activity of hypha-forming 97RL, 98RL, and 99RL cells was measured in the absence
or presence of DOX (20 µg/ml). The hyphal formation was induced
by N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and higher temperature (37°C). Although the luciferase activities of hypha-forming cells were higher than those of yeast cells, all reporter strains exhibited a
DOX-dependent repression of the luciferase activities (Table 3).
Similar results were obtained when RPMI 1640 was used as a
hyphal formation inducer (data not shown). These results
strongly suggest that this TR expression system can be
fully applicable in controlling gene expression in C. albicans in hypha-forming cells as well as in yeast cells.
Control of TEF3 and NMT1 genes by TR
promoter.
We applied the TR expression system to control the
expression of a particular endogenous gene in C. albicans.
As target genes, we chose the TEF3 and NMT1
genes, which are essential to cell growth (2, 15, 22,
23). We generated three controllable strains for each target gene
(97ATEF3, 98ATEF3, 99ATEF3, 97ANMT1, 98ANMT1, and 99ANMT1). In these
strains, one allele of the target gene was already disrupted by a
hisG sequence, and the promoter region of another allele was
replaced with TR promoters (Fig. 2 and see also Materials and Methods).
Since the TEF3 gene and the NMT1 gene are
required for viability, it was expected that the repression of
these genes would confer DOX-dependent growth defect upon the
cells. As shown in Fig. 4A and B, DOX did
not affect the growth of the parent strain, CAF2. In contrast, all six controllable strains (97ATEF3, 98ATEF3, 99ATEF3, 97ANMT1, 98ANMT1, and 99ANMT1) showed severe growth defects on YEPD plates containing DOX (20 µg/ml), whereas all of them could grow similar to
CAF2 in the absence of DOX. These results suggest that each transcriptional activity of TR promoters could be sufficient to support cell growth and that the DOX-mediated repression of
TEF3 or NMT1 transcription hampered cell growth.
To confirm these results, we investigated the transcriptional
levels of TEF3 or NMT1 using the activated (in
the absence of DOX) or repressed (in the presence of DOX) TR promoters
by Northern blot analysis. As shown by the results of the luciferase
reporter assay, the TR promoters provided various expression levels in
the absence of DOX; 99t showed the highest transcriptional activity. On
the other hand, in the presence of DOX (20 µg/ml), the mRNA level of
the TEF3 or NMT1 transcript from the TR promoters
markedly decreased within 2 h after addition of DOX, whereas DOX
did not significantly affect the level of ACT1 mRNA (Fig. 4C
and D). From these results, we conclude that the TR expression system
could control endogenous gene expression in C. albicans.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Control of the TEF3 or NMT1 gene
expression in C. albicans cells. (A) Effect of DOX on the
growth of the TEF3-controllable strains 97ATEF3, 98ATEF3,
and 99ATEF3. Cells of each strain were plated on YEPD agar (left) and
YEPD agar containing DOX (20 µg/ml) (right) and then incubated for
36 h at 30°C. (B) Effect of DOX on the growth of the
NMT1-controllable strains 97ANMT1, 98ANMT1, and 99ANMT1.
Cells of each strain were plated on YEPD agar (left) and YEPD agar
containing DOX (20 µg/ml) (right) and then incubated for 36 h at
30°C. (C) Northern blot analysis result of TEF3. Total RNA
was prepared from cells cultured with (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or without
DOX (20 µg/ml; lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) for 2 h. Fractionated RNA
(10 µg) obtained by agarose gel electrophoresis was blotted onto
Hybond-N, and the membrane was incubated with probes for the
TEF3 and ACT1 genes. The signal obtained from
ACT1 was used to normalize RNA signals. (D) Northern blot
analysis result of NMT. Total RNA was prepared from the
cells cultured with (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7) or without DOX (20 µg/ml;
lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) for 2 h. Fractionated RNA (10 µg) obtained
by agarose gel electrophoresis was blotted onto Hybond-N, and the
membrane was incubated with probes for the NMT1 and
ACT1 genes. The signal obtained from ACT1 was
used to normalize RNA signals.
|
|
Feasibility of TR system in C. albicans cells infecting
mice.
We investigated whether or not this system can control gene
expression in C. albicans infecting mice. The
controllable strains, 99ATEF3 and 97ANMT1, were chosen as test
strains using a mouse systemic candidiasis model, because it was
estimated that the mRNA level of TEF3 in 99ATEF3 or that of
NMT1 in 97ANMT1 was likely to be the same as that of the
endogenous TEF3 or NMT1 in CAF2 (Fig. 4C and D).
DOX was administered to mice in their drinking water from 2 days before
the infection. It had been confirmed that this regimen can maintain
sufficient DOX concentration in tissues for the C. glabrata
TR expression system to function in mice (17). All mice
infected with CAF2 cells died without significant differences in the
death rate between groups of mice (Fig.
5), suggesting that the course of
infection of C. albicans cells is not affected by DOX. On
the other hand, all DOX-treated mice infected with 99ATEF3 or 97ANMT1
cells survived, although 99ATEF3 or 97ANMT1 cells were still
virulent: DOX-untreated mice succumbed to infection with 99ATEF3
or 97ANMT1 cells even at a low infection dose (106
cells) (Fig. 5). In addition, we investigated the number of C. albicans cells in mouse kidneys infected with 99ATEF3 and 97ANMT1. Although these cells were equally recovered from both DOX-treated and
DOX-untreated mice 5 h after infection, the number of recovered cells dramatically decreased by 96 h after infection (Table
4). These results strongly suggest that
DOX could repress the expression of a C. albicans gene in
mice.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Survival rate of DOX-treated (closed symbols) or
DOX-untreated (open symbols) mice that were inoculated with 99ATEF3,
97ANMT1, and CAF2. Mice were intravenously infected with
106 cells (circles) or 107 cells (squares). The
percent survival shows the ratio of the number of surviving mice to
total number of mice (n = 5, 106 cells
infected; and n = 7, 107 cells infected).
Experiments were performed twice with the same results.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Studies on particular gene functions, particularly essentiality,
have been difficult in C. albicans since the application of
conventional genetic approaches has been hindered by its diploidy. In
this study, we showed that the TR expression system can control gene
expression in C. albicans with several advantages of this system over other gene expression systems in C. albicans.
First, the activities of the TR promoters 97t, 98t, and 99t can drive gene expression at different levels in the absence of DOX. Second, a
specific component of culture media, such as the carbon source, is not
required to repress gene expressions. These expressions can be
repressed by simply adding DOX into the media without affecting the
cell growth. We have shown that 50 µg of DOX per ml does not affect
the growth of C. albicans in YEPD, YEPGlcNAc or RPMI
1640, and the MIC for CAF2 cells cultured in YEPD or YNB was more than 200 µg of DOX per ml (data not shown). The TR expression system can
be applicable at least in hyphal-formation-inducing media such as
YEPGlcNAc and RPMI 1640, which contains 0.9% [wt/vol] glucose,
because TR promoters may have similar activity levels as we observed in
YEPD (Table 3). Moreover, this system is applicable in C. albicans cells infecting mice since DOX-treated mice infected with
the controllable strains survived, and the number of viable cells in
them was markedly reduced (Fig. 5 and Table 4). Thus, we could
demonstrate that this system would be easily applicable to studying
gene essentiality in various culture settings including in mice in vivo.
Nevertheless, some limitations, described as follows, are anticipated.
A previous study reported that the transcripts from the ENO1
promoter are induced by as much as 6- to 13-fold in glucose medium
(12). The activity of TR promoters may be reduced by a
gluconeogenic carbon source such as ethanol, since the expression level
of tetR-ScHAP4AD, which strongly affects the activity of TR
promoters, depends on the activity of ENO1 promoters.
In the mouse systemic candidiasis model, the virulence levels of the controllable strains, 99ATEF3 and 97ANMT1, were slightly reduced compared with that of CAF2. These reductions in virulence may be caused
by altering the level or the timing of expression of the
tetR-ScHAP4 protein, whereas expression level of the
TEF3 gene in 99ATEF3 and that of the NMT1 gene in
97ANMT1 were judged to be comparable to those in CAF2 under a
cultivation with YEPD. It should be also noted that targeted
integration of pCAITHE5 on the ENO1 locus may inactivate the
adjacent allele, resulting in a haplo-insufficiency that causes
reduction of virulence. In spite of these limitations, the essentiality
of in vivo for the target genes was clearly elucidated by comparing the
survival rate or the number of recovered C. albicans cells
from the kidneys of DOX-treated and DOX-untreated mice. Thus, this
expression system could also be a powerful tool for functional analyses
of C. albicans genes and may enable us to isolate of novel
virulence factors and to understand the mechanism of fungal infection.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank W. Fonzi (Georgetown University) for the gift of CAI8
and S. Miwa F. Ford and P. Hartmann for critically reading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Oncology, Nippon Roche K. K. Research Center, 200 Kajiwara,
Kamakura, Kanagawa 247-8530, Japan. Phone: 81-467-47-2218. Fax:
81-467-45-6782. E-mail: hironobu.nakayama{at}roche.com.
Present address: Department of Oncology, Nippon Roche K. K. Research Center, 200 Kajiwara, Kamakura, Kanagawa 247-8530, Japan.
Editor:
V. J. DiRita
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alani, E.,
L. Cao, and N. Kleckner.
1987.
A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.
Genetics
116:541-545[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Di Domenico, B. J.,
J. Lupisella,
M. Sandbaken, and K. Chakraburtty.
1992.
Isolation and sequence analysis of the gene encoding translation elongation factor 3 from Candida albicans.
Yeast
8:337-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Gallis, H. A.,
R. H. Drew, and W. W. Pickard.
1990.
Amphotericin B: 30 years of clinical experience.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
12:308-329[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Fonzi, W. A., and M. Y. Irwin.
1993.
Isogenic strain construction and gene mapping in Candida albicans.
Genetics
134:717-728[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Forsburg, S. L., and L. Guarente.
1989.
Identification and characterization of HAP4: a third component of the CCAAT-bound HAP2/HAP3 heteromer.
Genes Dev.
3:1166-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Gossen, M.,
A. L. Bonin, and H. Bujard.
1993.
Control of gene activity in higher eukaryotic cells by prokaryotic regulatory elements.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18:471-475[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Gossen, M. A., and H. Bujard.
1992.
Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hillen, W., and A. Wissmann.
1989.
Topics in molecular and structural biology, p. 143-162.
In
Protein-nucleic acid interaction, vol. 10. Macmillan Press, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 9.
|
Ito, H.,
Y. Fukuda,
K. Murata, and A. Kimura.
1983.
Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations.
J. Bacteriol.
153:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Kurtz, M. B.,
R. Kelly, and D. R. Kirsch.
1990.
The genetics of Candida, p. 21-74.
CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 11.
|
Magee, P. T., and S. Scherer.
1998.
Genome mapping and gene discovery in Candida albicans.
ASM News
64:505-511.
|
| 12.
|
Mason, A. B.,
H. R. Buckley, and J. A. Gorman.
1993.
Molecular cloning and characterization of the Candida albicans enolase gene.
J. Bacteriol.
175:2632-2639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Matthews, J. C.,
K. Hori, and M. J. Cormier.
1977.
Purification and properties of Renilla reniformis luciferase.
Biochemistry
16:85-91[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Mio, T.,
M. Adachi-Shimizu,
Y. Tachibana,
H. Tabuchi,
S. B. Inoue,
T. Yabe,
T. Yamada-Okabe,
M. Arisawa,
T. Watanabe, and H. Yamada-Okabe.
1997.
Cloning of the Candida albicans homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae GSC1/FKS1 and its involvement in -1,3-glucan synthesis.
J. Bacteriol.
179:4096-4105[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Myers, K. K.,
W. A. Fonzi, and P. S. Sypherd.
1992.
Isolation and sequence analysis of the gene for translation elongation factor 3 from Candida albicans.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:1705-1710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Nagahashi, S.,
H. Nakayama,
K. Hamada,
H. Yang,
M. Arisawa, and K. Kitada.
1997.
Regulation by tetracycline of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
255:372-375[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Nakayama, H.,
M. Izuta,
S. Nagahashi,
E. Y. Sihta,
Y. Sato,
T. Yamazaki,
M. Arisawa, and K. Kitada.
1998.
A controllable gene-expression system for the pathogenic fungus Candida glabrata.
Microbiology
144:2407-2415[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Odds, F. C.
1988.
Candida and candidosis: a review and bibliography, 2nd ed.
Bailliere Tindall, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 19.
|
Rex, J. H.,
M. G. Rinaldi, and M. A. Pfaller.
1995.
Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
39:1-8[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Santos, M. A., and M. F. Tuite.
1995.
The CUG codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in Candida albicans.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:1481-1486[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Srikantha, T.,
A. Klapach,
W. W. Lorenz,
L. K. Tsai,
L. A. Laughlin,
J. A. Gorman, and D. R. Soll.
1996.
The sea pansy Renilla reniformis luciferase serves as a sensitive bioluminescent reporter for differential gene expression in Candida albicans.
J. Bacteriol.
178:121-129[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Weinberg, R. A.,
C. A. McWherter,
S. K. Freeman,
D. C. Wood,
J. I. Gordon, and S. C. Lee.
1995.
Genetic studies reveal that myristoyl CoA: protein N-myristoyltransferase is an essential enzyme in Candida albicans.
Mol. Microbiol.
16:241-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Wiegand, R. C.,
C. Carr,
J. C. Minnerly,
A. M. Pauley,
C. P. Carron,
C. A. Langner,
R. J. Duronio, and J. I. Gordon.
1992.
The Candida albicans myristoyl-CoA: protein N-myristoyltransferase gene. Isolation and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:8591-8598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, December 2000, p. 6712-6719, Vol. 68, No. 12
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Carman, A. J., Vylkova, S., Lorenz, M. C.
(2008). Role of Acetyl Coenzyme A Synthesis and Breakdown in Alternative Carbon Source Utilization in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell
7: 1733-1741
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fu, Y., Luo, G., Spellberg, B. J., Edwards, J. E. Jr., Ibrahim, A. S.
(2008). Gene Overexpression/Suppression Analysis of Candidate Virulence Factors of Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell
7: 483-492
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bates, S., Hughes, H. B., Munro, C. A., Thomas, W. P. H., MacCallum, D. M., Bertram, G., Atrih, A., Ferguson, M. A. J., Brown, A. J. P., Odds, F. C., Gow, N. A. R.
(2006). Outer Chain N-Glycans Are Required for Cell Wall Integrity and Virulence of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 90-98
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Park, Y.-N., Morschhauser, J.
(2005). Tetracycline-Inducible Gene Expression and Gene Deletion in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell
4: 1328-1342
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Atir-Lande, A., Gildor, T., Kornitzer, D.
(2005). Role for the SCFCDC4 Ubiquitin Ligase in Candida albicans Morphogenesis. Mol. Biol. Cell
16: 2772-2785
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miwa, T., Takagi, Y., Shinozaki, M., Yun, C.-W., Schell, W. A., Perfect, J. R., Kumagai, H., Tamaki, H.
(2004). Gpr1, a Putative G-Protein-Coupled Receptor, Regulates Morphogenesis and Hypha Formation in the Pathogenic Fungus Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell
3: 919-931
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Saville, S. P., Lazzell, A. L., Monteagudo, C., Lopez-Ribot, J. L.
(2003). Engineered Control of Cell Morphology In Vivo Reveals Distinct Roles for Yeast and Filamentous Forms of Candida albicans during Infection. Eukaryot Cell
2: 1053-1060
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramon, A. M., Fonzi, W. A.
(2003). Diverged Binding Specificity of Rim101p, the Candida albicans Ortholog of PacC. Eukaryot Cell
2: 718-728
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Magee, P. T., Gale, C., Berman, J., Davis, D.
(2003). Molecular Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Study of Medically Important Fungi. Infect. Immun.
71: 2299-2309
[Full Text]
-
Steen, B. R., Lian, T., Zuyderduyn, S., MacDonald, W. K., Marra, M., Jones, S. J.M., Kronstad, J. W.
(2002). Temperature-Regulated Transcription in the Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genome Res
12: 1386-1400
[Abstract]
[Full Text]