Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, April 2000, p. 2349-2352, Vol. 68, No. 4
Department of Parasitology, Tulane Regional
Primate Research Center, Tulane University Medical Center,
Covington, Louisiana 70433
Received 3 November 1999/Returned for modification 1 December
1999/Accepted 21 December 1999
VlsE, the variable surface antigen of Borrelia
burgdorferi, contains a 26-amino-acid-long immunodominant
invariable region, IR6. In the present study, three
overlapping 14-mer peptides reproducing the sequence of IR6
were used as peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay antigens
to map this invariable region in infected monkeys, mice, and human Lyme
disease patients. Antibodies of the two primate species appeared to
recognize IR6 as a single antigenic determinant, while
mouse antibodies recognized multiple epitopes within this region.
Borrelia burgdorferi
sensu lato, the etiologic agent of Lyme disease (17),
expresses a surface antigen, VlsE, which undergoes antigenic variation
(21). Unlike other variable antigens, such as the variant
surface glycoprotein of African trypanosomes (1, 5, 6, 20)
and the variable major protein (Vmp) of Borrelia hermsii
(3, 14, 18), which contain nonantigenic invariable portions,
VlsE contains a 26-amino-acid-long invariable region (IR) which is
immunodominant (11). This sequence (IR6), which remains unchanged during antigenic variation (21), is highly conserved among strains and genospecies of B. burgdorferi
sensu lato (11) and may thus play a critical role in
maintaining the physiologic function of VlsE. Anti-IR6
immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody is readily detectable in both the early
and late phases of B. burgdorferi infection in mice,
monkeys, and humans (11, 12). However, since IR6
is exposed at the surface of the VlsE molecule but not at the surface
of the spirochete (11), anti-IR6 antibody is
likely not protective in vivo. On the other hand, the conservation and
immunodominance of IR6 indicates that anti-IR6 antibody may have powerful diagnostic attributes. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on a peptide with the IR6
sequence which is both sensitive and specific for the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease has been developed (12).
In this study, we attempted to map linear B-cell epitopes within
IR6 using sera from experimentally infected monkeys and
mice and from humans clinically diagnosed with Lyme disease. A
peptide-based ELISA was used.
The sequences of three overlapping 14-mer peptides were designed based
on a consensus of IR6 sequences from strains B31
(21) and 297 (10) of B. burgdorferi
sensu stricto and IP90 of Borrelia garinii (11)
(Fig. 1). The three 14-mers were named
C6N, C6M, and C6C. They were
prepared using the fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl synthesis protocol
(2). N-terminal conjugation to biotin was performed by the
N-succinimidyl maleimide carboxylate method as per the
instructions of the manufacturer (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.).
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Epitope Mapping of the Immunodominant Invariable
Region of Borrelia burgdorferi VlsE in Three Host
Species
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Diagrammatic illustration of the VlsE structure. VlsE
consists of two invariable domains at the amino and carboxyl termini
and one variable domain at the center (21). The variable
domain contains six variable regions, VRI to
VRVI, and six invariable regions, IR1 to
IR6. The framed sequences show the IR6
sequences from strains B31 (21) and 297 (10) of
B. burgdorferi sensu stricto and IP90 of B. garinii (11). Bold letters indicate amino acids unique
to each strain. The consensus sequences of the three overlapping
peptides used in this study are depicted below (C6N,
C6M, and C6C). The C6 sequence is
based on that of IR6 of IP90.
The peptide-based ELISA was performed as previously described
(11). Briefly, 96-well ELISA plates were coated with
streptavidin (Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, Ill.) in coating
buffer (0.1 M carbonate buffer, pH 9.2), followed by incubation with
biotinylated peptides. Then antiserum and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody dilutions (goat anti-monkey
IgG [
chain specific; Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories,
Gaithersburg, Md.], anti-mouse IgG [heavy and light chain specific;
Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.], or anti-human IgG [heavy and
light chain specific; Pierce]) were applied. The antigen-antibody
reaction was probed using a peroxidase substrate system (Kirkegaard & Perry), and optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm. For
competitive peptide-based ELISA, the biotinylated peptide
C6 was applied to the ELISA plate which had been coated
with streptavidin. Competitive inhibition of anti-C6
antibody was performed by adding 50 µl of 14-mer peptide(s) (C6N, C6M, C6C, or a combination of
two or three of the peptides), each between 0 and 5,000 ng per well. An
equal volume of serum diluted 1:100 with blocking solution
(phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dry
milk, pH 7.4) was added to each well. The plate was shaken for 1 h. The remaining steps were performed as described for the
peptide-based ELISA.
Ten serum samples derived from each host species were used to epitope map IR6. Serum specimens were obtained from 10 rhesus monkeys (2- to 4-year-old Macaca mulatta), 9 of which had been inoculated by the bites of Ixodes scapularis nymphal ticks and 1 of which had been inoculated with needle and syringe. The ticks were themselves infected with either of the B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strains JD1 (15) and B31 (16). The needle-inoculated animal received JD1 organisms (15). Ten mice (6- to 8-week-old C3H/HeN mice; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine) were infected either with B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strain Sh-2-82 (low passage number; a gift from Denee Thomas, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Tex.) by subcutaneous needle inoculation with 108 spirochetes administered in 1 ml of BSK-H medium (Sigma) or with B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strain B31 by the bites of infected ticks. Serum samples were collected before and 4 to 6 weeks postinfection. Human serum samples were collected from 10 Lyme disease patients who had disease signs and symptoms that satisfied the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical case definition (7). Five patients (A1 to A5) were diagnosed as having late Lyme arthritis, and five patients (N1 to N5) had late neuroborreliosis. Sera were kindly supplied by Allen Steere (New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.).
Sera from 9 out of 10 infected monkeys did not contain detectable
anti-14-mer peptide antibodies despite the presence of high levels of
anti-C6 antibody in virtually all of the specimens (Fig. 2). Only monkey J200 showed a significant
reactivity with C6C. These results indicate that this host
species most likely recognizes the entire IR6 segment as a
single antigenic determinant.
|
Four out of 10 human serum samples showed reactivity with the
overlapping peptide C6M, but none contained detectable
antibodies to C6N or C6C (Fig.
3A). To determine what proportion of
anti-C6 antibody reactivity was contributed by antibody to
C6M, a competitive peptide-based ELISA was performed. The
reactivity of specific antibody with C6 in the four serum
samples (A1, A2, N1, and N3) which reacted with C6M was
fully inhibited by increasing concentrations of C6M (Fig.
3B). Even though serum N1 showed a very weak reactivity with
C6M in the peptide-based ELISA (Fig. 3A), a high
concentration of this peptide was necessary to fully inhibit the
reactivity with C6 (Fig. 3B). The low reactivity with
C6M in the peptide-based ELISA but full inhibition in the
competitive ELISA may have resulted from human antibodies with a lower
affinity for C6M than for C6. C6M
may bind antibody as a partial epitope. No significant inhibition was
observed when the peptides C6N and C6C were
used in this assay (data not shown). Hence, the inhibition observed
with the peptide C6M should be considered specific. Taken
together, our results suggest that humans, like monkeys, recognize
IR6 as a single epitope.
|
A different result was obtained when mouse sera were tested. High-level
antibody responses to all three 14-mers were detected in several
animals. Seven mice (mice 184, 219, 220, 224, 288, 289, and 290) had
antibodies that reacted with the peptide C6N. While serum
from the first four animals reacted weakly, that of the latter three
reacted as strongly as with the complete C6 peptide (Fig.
4). Another set of three mice (mice 220, 288, and 290) had anti-C6M antibodies, and five mice (mice
184, 191, 224, 289, and 290) possessed anti-C6C antibodies
(Fig. 4). Mouse 289 responded to both C6N and
C6C but not to C6M, indicating that this animal processed at least two independent epitopes at the amino and carboxyl termini of IR6. Serum collected from mouse 288 reacted with
both C6N and C6M, while serum from mouse 290 reacted with all three overlapping peptides. Competitive peptide-based
ELISA revealed much more complicated antibody responses to
IR6 in mice than in monkeys and humans. Even the
combination of the three overlapping peptides failed to fully inhibit
the reactivity of serum 290 with the C6 peptide (data not
shown). The overlapping peptides C6N and C6M
together also could not fully inhibit the reactivity of serum 288 with
C6, although C6C did not react with this serum (data not shown). These results suggest that mice are able to recognize
multiple epitopes within IR6.
|
Although we cannot fully exclude the possibility that the antibody response to 14-mer portions of IR6 was exacerbated in mice because of the mode of inoculation (needle versus tick inoculation) or the strain of spirochete used (B31 versus Sh-2-82), we do not believe that these factors may fully explain the difference we observed in the responses to these sequences in the host species studied. The mode of inoculation may influence the antibody response because a higher dose of spirochetes is likely received by needle- than by tick-inoculated animals, and immune-suppressive substances are inoculated by the tick concomitantly with spirochetes (19). All of the six needle-inoculated mice that received the Sh-2-82 strain responded to one or more of the 14-mers, yet half of the four tick-inoculated mice also responded to C6C and one responded weakly to C6N. Monkey J748, which was needle inoculated, did not respond to any of the 14-mer peptides. As to spirochete strain differences, it is possible that spirochetes of the Sh-2-82 strain express a higher level of VlsE than that expressed by B31 organisms in vivo and may thus facilitate antipeptide responses. This we cannot exclude, but the fact that none of the four tick-inoculated monkeys that received the B31 strain responded to 14-mers whereas two of the four B31 tick-inoculated mice did underscores host species difference as the major reason for the differential responsiveness to fragments of IR6 that we found.
Most B-cell epitopes of native protein antigens are discontinuous in
that they encompass regions which are separate from each other in the
primary sequence of the polypeptide chain but are brought together on
the native molecule by protein folding (4). Our results
suggest that IR6 may function as a single epitope, probably
nonlinear in view of its length, in primate species, human or nonhuman,
but that IR6 may behave as a collection of multiple
overlapping linear epitopes in mice. Analysis of the secondary
structure of IR6 by either the Chou-Fasman (8)
or the Robson-Garnier (9) algorithms (MacVector 4.1; Eastman
Chemical Co., New Haven, Conn.) predicted an
-helix comprised of an
11-mer sequence [AA(I or M)(A or V)LRGMAKD] regardless of whether the B31, 297, or IP90 IR6 sequence was used in the calculation.
The 11-amino-acid segment is located at the center of IR6
and is fully included in the C6M peptide (Fig. 1). In
humans, this helix may serve as the epitope core, for when
C6M was used as a competitor, it was able to fully inhibit
the reactivity of human serum antibody with C6, albeit at a
high concentration of the peptide (Fig. 3). The sequences immediately
flanking the
-helix probably contribute to the binding affinity
either by allowing the
-helix to "grow" or by contributing some
tertiary structure to it, since human antibody yielded a higher ELISA
OD with C6 than with C6M. The remarkable
antigenicity of IR6 in several host species argues against
the presence of additional, discontinuous regions of VlsE as
contributors to the native antigenicity of IR6. In fact,
all experimentally infected mice and monkeys we have tested thus far (10 mice and 10 monkeys), most human patients with early B. burgdorferi infections (117 of 138), and all patients with a late,
clinically well defined infection (we tested 59) had detectable
anti-IR6 antibodies (11, 12). Thus, while the
totality of IR6 appears to be required to express the full
antigenicity of this region, it is unlikely that other VlsE portions
are required as well. Our studies have uncovered striking differences
in the antibody responses to the invariable regions of VlsE in
different host species. We had noted previously that mouse antibodies
recognized IR2, IR4, and IR6 but
that monkey and human antibodies reacted essentially only with
IR6 (13). The present study revealed that primate host species recognize IR6 in toto but that mice
appear to detect multiple linear and overlapping epitopes within this region. If VlsE plays a role in the host-microbe interplay of B. burgdorferi, these differences in B-cell antigen recognition patterns could contribute to explain, once that role has become clear,
differences in the natural histories of murine and primate Lyme
disease. At a more general level, this finding illustrates that B-cell
epitope mapping is host dependent.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants AI35027 and RR00164 from the National Institutes of Health and by a grant from SmithKline Beecham Biologicals.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Tulane Regional Primate Research Center, Tulane University Medical Center, 18703 Three Rivers Rd., Covington, LA 70433. Phone: (504) 871-6221. Fax: (504) 871-6390. E-mail: philipp{at}tpc.tulane.edu.
Editor: R. N. Moore
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Barbet, A. F., and T. C. McGuire.
1978.
Crossreacting determinants in variant-specific surface antigens of African trypanosomes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
75:1989-1993 |
| 2. | Barony, G., and R. B. Merrifield. 1980. The peptides: analysis, synthesis, & biology, p. 3-285. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 3. |
Barstad, P. A.,
J. E. Coligan,
M. G. Raum, and A. G. Barbour.
1985.
Variable major proteins of Borrelia hermsii. Epitope mapping and partial sequence analysis of CNBr peptides.
J. Exp. Med.
161:1302-1314 |
| 4. | Benjamin, D. C. 1995. B-cell epitopes: fact and fiction, p. 95-108. In L. M. Aledort, et al. (ed.), Inhibitors to coagulation factors. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 5. | Borst, P. 1991. Molecular genetics of antigenic variation. Immunol. Today 12:A29-A33[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. | Borst, P., and G. A. M. Cross. 1982. Molecular basis for trypanosome antigenic variation. Cell 29:291-303[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Case definition for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. Morbid. Mortal. Weekly Rep. 46:20. |
| 8. | Chou, P. Y., and G. D. Fasman. 1978. Empirical predictions of protein conformations. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 47:251-276[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Garnier, J., D. J. Osguthorpe, and B. Robson. 1978. Analysis of the accuracy and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 120:97-120[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Kawabata, H., F. Myouga, Y. Inagaki, N. Murai, and H. Watanabe. 1998. Genetic and immunological analyses of Vls (VMP-like sequences) of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microb. Pathog. 24:155-166[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Liang, F. T.,
A. L. Alvarez,
Y. Gu,
J. M. Nowling,
R. Ramamoorthy, and M. T. Philipp.
1999.
An immunodominant conserved region within the variable domain of VlsE, the variable surface antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi.
J. Immunol.
163:5566-5573 |
| 12. |
Liang, F. T.,
A. C. Steere,
A. R. Marques,
B. J. B. Johnson,
J. N. Miller, and M. T. Philipp.
1999.
Sensitive and specific serodiagnosis of Lyme disease by ELISA with a peptide based on an immunodominant conserved region of Borrelia burgdorferi VlsE.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:3990-3996 |
| 13. |
Liang, F. T., and M. T. Philipp.
1999.
Analysis of antibody response to invariable regions of VlsE, the variable surface antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi.
Infect. Immun.
67:6702-6706 |
| 14. | Meier, J. T., M. I. Simon, and A. G. Barbour. 1985. Antigenic variation is associated with DNA rearrangements in a relapsing fever Borrelia. Cell 41:403-409[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Philipp, M. T.,
M. K. Aydintug,
R. P. Bohm, Jr.,
F. B. Cogswell,
V. A. Dennis,
H. N. Lanners,
R. C. Lowrie, Jr.,
E. D. Roberts,
M. D. Conway,
M. Karaçorlu,
G. A. Peyman,
D. J. Gubler,
B. J. B. Johnson,
J. Piesman, and Y. Gu.
1993.
Early and early disseminated phases of Lyme disease in the rhesus monkey: a model for infection in humans.
Infect. Immun.
61:3047-3059 |
| 16. | Philipp, M. T., Y. Lobet, R. P. Bohm, Jr., E. D. Roberts, V. A. Dennis, Y. Gu, R. C. Lowrie, Jr., P. Desmons, P. H. Duray, J. England, P. Hauser, J. Piesman, and K. Xu. 1997. The outer surface protein A (OspA) vaccine against Lyme disease: efficacy in the rhesus monkey. Vaccine 15:1872-1884[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Steere, A. C. 1989. Lyme disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:586-596[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Stoenner, H. G.,
T. Dodd, and C. Larsen.
1982.
Antigenic variation of Borrelia hermsii.
J. Exp. Med.
156:1297-1311 |
| 19. |
Urioste, S.,
L. R. Hall,
S. R. Telford III, and R. G. Titus.
1994.
Saliva of the Lyme disease vector, Ixodes dommini, blocks cell activation by a nonprostaglandin E2-dependent mechanism.
J. Exp. Med.
180:1077-1085 |
| 20. | Van der Ploeg, L. H. T., K. Gottesdiener, and M. G. S. Lee. 1992. Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Trends Genet. 8:452-457[Medline]. |
| 21. | Zhang, J. R., J. M. Hardham, A. G. Barbour, and S. J. Norris. 1997. Antigenic variation in Lyme disease borreliae by promiscuous recombination of VMP-like sequence cassettes. Cell 89:275-285[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»