Infection and Immunity, April 2000, p. 2369-2373, Vol. 68, No. 4
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Virginia at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 232981; Department of Biology, Mary Baldwin College, Staunton, Virginia 244013; and Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark2
Received 17 November 1999/Returned for modification 15 December 1999/Accepted 3 January 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we describe the molecular and immunological characterization of the bdr gene family of Borrelia turicatae, a relapsing-fever spirochete. Nine bdr alleles belonging to two different subfamilies were sequenced and localized to linear plasmids. Anti-Bdr antiserum was generated and used to analyze Bdr expression in pre- and postinfection isogenic populations. The analyses presented here provide a detailed characterization of the Bdr proteins in a relapsing-fever spirochete species, enhancing our understanding of these proteins at the genus-wide level.
| |
TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Borrelia species are causative agents of several important diseases, including Lyme disease and relapsing fever (reviewed in references 2 and 10). Plasmid-encoded proteins are thought to be important in virulence and in adaptation as the Borrelia pass between mammals and arthropods (1, 3, 4, 8, 14, 16, 19, 21, 24, 26). The plasmid-carried bdr gene family of the Borrelia is a large group of genes of unknown function (6, 17, 18, 23, 25, 27). The Bdr proteins possess a large polymorphic repeat motif domain encoding putative Ser-Thr phosphorylation motifs and a potential transmembrane-spanning C-terminal domain. These features may indicate membrane anchoring and suggest a possible regulatory function. In this report, we have conducted an analysis of the bdr gene family of Borrelia turicatae to further characterize these proteins and to identify evolutionarily conserved domains.
B. turicatae OZ-1 (kindly provided by Alan Barbour) was cultivated in BSK-H medium (Sigma), supplemented to a 12% concentration with rabbit serum, at either 22, 32, or 37°C. The infectivity of B. turicatae OZ-1 was confirmed by the intradermal injection of ~500 spirochetes between the shoulder blades of 6-week-old, male, C3H/HeJ mice and subsequent dark-field microscopic analysis of blood smears. Spirochetes were recovered by the cultivation of spirochetemic blood in BSK-H medium. Subsurface plating was performed as previously described (22). Only clonal populations were used in the following analyses. DNA was isolated from the spirochetes as previously described (12, 13).
bdr alleles were recovered either from a B. turicatae OZ-1 Lambda Zap II genomic library or by PCR
amplification with a variety of primers targeting either the
bdr genes directly or their flanking sequences. The library
was constructed, packaged, and propagated as described by the
manufacturer (Stratagene) with
XbaI-EcoRI-digested genomic DNA serving as the
starting material. The GigapackIII Gold system was used for packaging.
Plaque lifts were performed with Hybond-N membranes (Amersham)
according to procedures described within the Lambda Zap II library
manual. The lifts were probed with a 666-bp bdr-targeting
PCR probe generated by amplification of the B. turicatae
bdrA1 gene (6). All probes and primers used
in this study are described in Table 1.
Probe labeling was accomplished with the Hi-Prime labeling kit
(Boehringer Mannheim) and
-32P-dATP (3,000 Ci
mmol
1; DuPont-NEN). The inserts carried by
hybridization-positive plaques were excised from the recombinant phage
with the ExAssist helper phage (Stratagene), and the resulting
phagemids were prepared and amplified in Escherichia coli
SOLR cells. Sequencing was performed with the Sequitherm Excel DNA
sequencing kit (Epicentre Technologies). Additional bdr
alleles were recovered by PCR with the bdrABF1-bdrA1R1 and the
bdrABF1-BBG30hF2 primer sets. We previously demonstrated that the
B. turicatae bdrA1 allele is 3' flanked by an
open reading frame (ORF) homologous to BBG30 of the Lyme disease
spirochetes (6, 18). Use of the BBG30hF2 primer allowed for
the recovery of bdr alleles not amplified with the
bdrA1R1 reverse primer. Both primer sets yielded several
PCR amplicons (data not shown) consistent with the detection of
multiple bdr alleles in B. turicatae by
hybridization (6). The amplicons were cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega), and recombinants carrying the bdr
hybridization-positive inserts were sequenced. In total, nine
bdr alleles encoding acidic polypeptides ranging in size
from 16.9 to 30.2 kDa were identified (Fig.
1). Analysis of the N-terminal domains,
which could be unambiguously aligned, revealed that there are two Bdr
subfamilies, BdrA (alleles bdrA1 through
bdrA4) and BdrB (alleles
bdrB1 through bdrB5). The nomenclature strategy used to name the bdr genes
sequenced in this report has been previously described (7,
18). While the B. turicatae Bdr sequences are
significantly divergent from those of the Lyme disease spirochetes
(5, 9, 17, 25, 27), the repeat motif domain remains
conserved (with the exception of a variable number of repeat elements).
As with other Bdr protein sequences, the B. turicatae Bdr
sequences possess a C-terminal variable domain that is predicted by
TmPred analyses to be transmembrane spanning (scores ranged from 1,965 to 2,414; 500 is significant). Several of the bdr loci carry
an oppositely oriented ORF on the opposing DNA strand (relative to the
bdr genes) designated as the bdr (
) (previously
referred to as the rep (
) [17]). The B. turicatae bdrA1 (
),
bdrA2 (
), bdrA3 (
),
and bdrA4 (
) loci encode putative basic
Bdr
proteins of 10.5, 16, 15.9, and 13.6 kDa,
respectively (data not shown). While expression of at least some
bdr (
) alleles has been reported in Borrelia
burgdorferi (17), the significance and biological role
of the Bdr
proteins has not yet been addressed.
|
|
Hybridization analyses of the B. turicatae bdr genes using
subfamily-specific probes were conducted to provide an indication of
the minimum number of members of each bdr subfamily
carried by B. turicatae (Fig.
2). XbaI-digested
genomic DNA was electrophoresed, blotted, and hybridized with
end-labeled oligonucleotides as previously described
(6). The subfamily A probe (bdrAsfR1) hybridized with
five bands (two strong and three weak), while the subfamily B probe
(bdrBsfR1) hybridized with seven bands (five strong and two weak)
indicating that there are 12 or more bdr alleles in B. turicatae OZ-1. B. burgdorferi B31
carries 18 bdr alleles (9) that are organized
into three distinct subfamilies (18).
|
The identity and conformation of the plasmids carrying the
B. turicatae bdr genes were determined by two-dimensional
contour-clamped homogenous electric field (CHEF)-pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis (2D-CHEF-PFGE) and Southern blotting with
subfamily-specific probes as previously described (11). In
this 2D-CHEF-PFGE electrophoresis system, the circular plasmids exhibit
diffuse banding, migrating behind the axis of migration of the linear
plasmids. The parameters for PFGE were as follows: run time, 19 h
and 18 min; buffer, 0.5× TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA [pH 8.0]);
temperature, 14°C; ramping constant,
1.400; initial switch time,
0.47 s; final switch time, 4.48 s; angle, 120°; gradient, 6 V cm
1. After electrophoresis in the first dimension, the
gels were rotated 90° and electrophoresed for 3 h in 0.5× TBE
at 80 V (constant field). The fractionated DNA was blotted and
hybridized with subfamily-specific probes. Probes specific for the
bdrA and bdrB subfamilies hybridized exclusively
with linear plasmids (Fig. 3). Four
linear plasmids of ~56, 50, 30, and 25 kb hybridized strongly with
the bdrBsfR1 probe (plasmids of ~220 and 42 kb hybridized faintly).
With the bdrAsfR1 probe, three linear plasmids of 56, 50, and 39 kb
hybridized strongly (plasmids of 220 and 25 kb hybridized faintly). The
detection of multiple hybridizing linear plasmids is consistent with
the detection of multiple hybridizing restriction fragments in the analyses described above. The hybridization of both probes to plasmids
of the same size (e.g., 220, 56, and 50 kb) may indicate that some
plasmids carry both bdrA and bdrB subfamily
members. Alternatively, there may be comigrating
bdr-carrying plasmids. From these analyses, it can be
concluded that in contrast to B. burgdorferi,
which carries its bdrD and bdrE genes on circular plasmids and its bdrF genes on linear plasmids (reviewed in
reference 18), the B. turicatae bdr genes
are carried exclusively by linear plasmids.
|
To analyze the expression of the B. turicatae Bdr proteins,
anti-Bdr antiserum was generated with a recombinant Bdr protein derived from Borrelia afzelii DK1. The
bdrF1 gene was amplified by PCR with the BA60
and BA61 primers, the amplicon was cut with EcoRV,
ligated into pMST24 digested with SmaI (yielding a
hexahistidyl-tagged fusion), cloned, expressed, and purified
as previously described (23). Anti-Bdr antiserum was
generated in rabbits as previously described (23). The
goals of the immunological analyses were to determine if (i) there are
differences in expression patterns in clonal populations, (ii)
temperature influences expression, (iii) expression patterns change as
a result of passage through mice, (iv) expression patterns change after
6 weeks of cultivation, and (v) molecular changes occur in the
evolutionarily unstable repeat motif region during infection or after
in vitro cultivation (as inferred from changes in the molecular weights
[MW] of the expressed proteins). To accomplish these goals,
immunoblot analyses were performed as previously described
(18). The set of expressed Bdr proteins (both in terms of
the number of alleles expressed and their MW) was the same in all
postinfection clonal populations (Fig.
4). The expression patterns were the same
as that seen in the preinfection parental strain, were not influenced
by temperature (data not shown), and did not change as a result of 6 weeks of in vitro cultivation. The stability of the MW of the expressed Bdr proteins indicates that polymorphisms in the repeat motif domain
did not arise under the conditions employed in this study. Lastly, to
analyze the pI of the Bdr proteins, cell lysate from a clonal
population was subjected to isoelectric focusing (IEF), two-dimensional
electrophoresis according to the method of O'Farrell (15) (Kendrick Labs, Inc., Madison, Wis.), and
immunoblotting. These analyses revealed that at least six
different Bdr species were expressed (based on MW differences). Several
of the expressed proteins exhibited pI's in the range predicted
by their primary sequences; however, numerous isomorphs of
each species were observed, indicating that there may be variable
modifications of the Bdr proteins that alter the isoelectric
point.
|
In conclusion, we have identified and characterized several linear plasmid-carried bdr genes that form two subfamilies in B. turicatae. The putative functional domains of these proteins, specifically the Ser-Thr phosphorylation motifs and transmembrane-spanning domains, were demonstrated to be conserved in their primary sequence and/or physical properties at the interspecies level, implying an important role in Bdr function and Borrelia biology. Expression analyses demonstrated that a subset of bdr alleles are expressed during in vitro cultivation and that overall expression patterns remained consistent among clonal populations and were not effected by passage through mice, in vitro cultivation, or changes in the temperature of cultivation. IEF and two-dimensional electrophoresis experimentally confirmed the predicted acidic pI for most Bdr proteins but also demonstrated that there are isomorphs of each species, which may indicate protein modifications. It has been postulated that the Bdr proteins may be anchored to the inner membrane via their C-terminal hydrophobic domain and undergo Ser-Thr phosphorylation within the repeat motif domain in response to changing environmental conditions (18). Sequencing of the B. burgdorferi genome and subsequent analysis of putative active site motifs revealed the presence of ORFs encoding a putative Ser-Thr kinase designated BB0648 and a member of the PPM family of eucaryotic protein Ser-Thr phosphatases (BB0836) (9, 20). Regarding the multiallelic nature of the bdr genes, Bdr variation and redundancy could provide functional or regulatory flexibility in the diverse environments that the Borrelia encounter in the course of cycling between mammals and arthropods. The demonstration of the conservation of specific putative Bdr functional domains and the existence of distinct subfamilies can now serve as a foundation for the design of experiments to test their putative functions.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The B. turicatae bdr genes have been assigned the accession numbers AF128445 through AF128452, respectively.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We wish to acknowledge the input of the Molecular Pathogenesis Group at Virginia Commonwealth University.
This work was supported by a grant from the Jeffress Trust.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical College of Virginia at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298. Phone: (804) 828-3779. Fax: (804) 828-9946. E-mail: RMARCONI{at}hsc.vcu.edu.
Present address: Department of Internal Medicine, Section of
Rheumatology, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation 604, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8031.
Editor: J. T. Barbieri
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Akins, D., S. F. Porcella, T. G. Popova, D. Shevchenko, S. I. Baker, M. Li, M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf. 1995. Evidence for in vivo but not in vitro expression of a Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein F (OspF) homologue. Mol. Microbiol. 18:507-520[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Barbour, A. G., and S. F. Hayes.
1986.
Biology of Borrelia species.
Microbiol. Rev.
50:381-400 |
| 3. | Cadavid, D., P. M. Pennington, T. A. Kerentseva, S. Bergsrom, and A. G. Barbour. 1997. Immunologic and genetic analyses of VmpA of a neurotropic strain of Borrelia turicatae. Infect. Immun. 65:3352-3360[Abstract]. |
| 4. |
Cadavid, D.,
D. Thomas,
R. Crawley, and A. Barbour.
1994.
Variability of a bacterial surface protein and disease expression in a possible mouse model of systemic Lyme borreliosis.
J. Exp. Med.
179:631-642 |
| 5. |
Caimano, M. J.,
X. Yang,
T. G. Popova,
M. L. Clawson,
D. R. Akins,
M. V. Norgard, and J. D. Radolf.
2000.
Molecular and evolutionary characterization of the cp32/18 family of supercoiled plasmids in Borrelia burgdorferi 297.
Infect. Immun.
68:1574-1586 |
| 6. |
Carlyon, J. A., and R. T. Marconi.
1998.
Cloning and molecular characterization of a multicopy, linear plasmid-carried, repeat motif-containing gene from Borrelia turicatae, a causative agent of relapsing fever.
J. Bacteriol.
180:4974-4981 |
| 7. | Carlyon, J. A., D. M. Roberts, and R. T. Marconi. 2000. Evolutionary and molecular analyses of the Borrelia bdr super gene family: delineation of distinct sub-families and demonstration of the genus wide conservation of putative functional domains, structural properties and repeat motifs. Microb. Pathog. 28:89-105[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. |
Champion, C. I.,
D. R. Blanco,
J. T. Skare,
D. A. Haake,
M. Giladi,
D. Foley,
J. N. Miller, and M. A. Lovett.
1994.
A 9.0 kilobase-pair circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferi encodes an exported protein: evidence for expression only during infection.
Infect. Immun.
62:2653-2661 |
| 9. | Fraser, C., S. Casjens, W. M. Huang, G. G. Sutton, R. Clayton, R. Lathigra, O. White, K. A. Ketchum, R. Dodson, E. K. Hickey, M. Gwinn, B. Dougherty, J. F. Tomb, R. D. Fleischman, D. Richardson, J. Peterson, A. R. Kerlavage, J. Quackenbush, S. Salzberg, M. Hanson, R. Vugt, N. Palmer, M. D. Adams, J. Gocayne, J. Weidman, T. Utterback, L. Watthey, L. McDonald, P. Artiach, C. Bowman, S. Garland, C. Fujii, M. D. Cotton, K. Horst, K. Roberts, B. Hatch, H. O. Smith, and J. C. Venter. 1997. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature 390:580-586[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Johnson, R. C., G. P. Schmid, F. W. Hyde, A. G. Steigerwalt, and D. J. Brenner. 1984. Borrelia burgdorferi sp. nov.: etiologic agent of Lyme disease. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 34:496-497. |
| 11. |
Marconi, R. T.,
S. Casjens,
U. G. Munderloh, and D. S. Samuels.
1996.
Analysis of linear plasmid dimers in Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates: implications concerning the potential mechanism of linear plasmid replication.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3357-3361 |
| 12. |
Marconi, R. T.,
D. S. Samuels,
R. K. Landry, and C. F. Garon.
1994.
Analysis of the distribution and molecular heterogeneity of the ospD gene among the Lyme disease spirochetes: evidence for lateral gene exchange.
J. Bacteriol.
176:4572-4582 |
| 13. | Marconi, R. T., J. Wigboldus, H. Weissbach, and N. Brot. 1991. Transcriptional start and MetR binding sites on the Escherichia coli metH gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 175:1057-1063[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Norris, S. J.,
C. J. Carter,
J. K. Howell, and A. G. Barbour.
1992.
Low-passage-associated proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi B31: characterization and molecular cloning of OspD, a surface-exposed, plasmid-encoded lipoprotein.
Infect. Immun.
60:4662-4672 |
| 15. |
O'Farrell, P. H.
1975.
High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
250:4007-4021 |
| 16. | Pennington, P. M., C. D. Allred, C. S. West, R. Alvarez, and A. G. Barbour. 1997. Arthritis severity and spirochete burden are determined by serotype in the Borrelia turicatae-mouse model of Lyme disease. Infect. Immun. 65:285-292[Abstract]. |
| 17. |
Porcella, S. F.,
T. G. Popova,
D. R. Akins,
M. Li,
J. R. Radolf, and M. V. Norgard.
1996.
Borrelia burgdorferi supercoiled plasmids encode multicopy open reading frames and a lipoprotein gene family.
J. Bacteriol.
178:3293-3307 |
| 18. | Roberts, D. M., J. A. Carlyon, M. Theisen, and R. T. Marconi. The bdr gene families of the Lyme disease and relapsing fever spirochetes: potential influence on biology, pathogenesis and evolution. Emerg. Infect. Dis., in press. |
| 19. |
Sadziene, A.,
A. G. Barbour,
P. A. Rosa, and D. D. Thomas.
1993.
An OspB mutant of Borrelia burgdorferi has reduced invasiveness in vitro and reduced infectivity in vivo.
Infect. Immun.
61:3590-3596 |
| 20. | Shi, L., M. Potts, and P. J. Kennelly. 1998. The serine, threonine and/or tyrosine protein kinases and protein phosphatases of procaryotic organisms: a family portrait. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22:229-253[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Suk, K.,
S. Das,
W. Sun,
B. Jwang,
S. W. Barthold,
R. A. Flavell, and E. Fikrig.
1995.
Borrelia burgdorferi genes selectively expressed in the infected host.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:4269-4273 |
| 22. |
Sung, S. Y.,
J. McDowell,
J. A. Carlyon, and R. T. Marconi.
2000.
Mutation and recombination in the UHB-flanked ospE-related genes of the Lyme disease spirochetes results in the development of new antigenic variants during infection.
Infect. Immun.
68:1319-1327 |
| 23. |
Theisen, M.
1996.
Molecular cloning and characterization of nlpH, encoding a novel, surface-exposed, polymorphic, plasmid-encoded 33-kilodalton lipoprotein of Borrelia afzelii.
J. Bacteriol.
178:6435-6442 |
| 24. | Wallich, R., C. Brenner, M. D. Kramer, and M. M. Simon. 1995. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel linear-plasmid-encoded gene, pG, of Borrelia burgdorferi expressed only in vivo. Infect. Immun. 63:3327-3335[Abstract]. |
| 25. |
Yang, X.,
T. G. Popova,
K. E. Hagman,
S. K. Wikel,
G. B. Schoeler,
M. J. Caimano,
J. D. Radolf, and M. Norgard.
1999.
Identification, characterization, and expression of three new members of the Borrelia burgdorferi Mlp (2.9) lipoprotein gene family.
Infect. Immun.
67:6008-6018 |
| 26. | Zhang, J.-R., J. M. Hardham, A. G. Barbour, and S. J. Norris. 1997. Antigenic variation in Lyme disease borreliae by promiscuous recombination of VMP-like sequence cassettes. Cell 89:275-285[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. |
Zückert, W. R., and J. Meyer.
1996.
Circular and linear plasmids of Lyme disease spirochetes have extensive homology: characterization of a repeated DNA element.
J. Bacteriol.
178:2287-2298 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|