Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, June 2000, p. 3305-3313, Vol. 68, No. 6
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Characterization of FimY as a Coactivator of Type 1 Fimbrial Expression in Salmonella enterica Serovar
Typhimurium
Juliette K.
Tinker and
Steven
Clegg*
Department of Microbiology, College of
Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received 13 December 1999/Returned for modification 14 February
2000/Accepted 14 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Type 1 fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serovar
Typhimurium are surface appendages that carry adhesins specific for
mannosylated host glycoconjugates. Regulation of the major fimbrial
subunit is thought to be controlled by a number of ancillary
fim genes, including fimZ, fimY,
fimW, and fimU. Previous studies using a FimZ
mutant have indicated that this protein is necessary for fimA expression, and in vitro DNA binding assays determined
that FimZ is a transcriptional activator that binds directly to the fimA promoter. To determine the role of FimY as a potential
regulator of fimbrial expression, a fimY mutant of serovar
Typhimurium was generated by allelic exchange. This mutant was found to
be phenotypically nonfimbriate. No transcription from the
fimA promoter was detected in a fimY mutant
containing a fimA-lacZ reporter construct located on the
chromosome. In addition, transcription from the cloned fimY
promoter was not detected in Escherichia coli unless both FimZ and FimY were present, indicating that these proteins also act as
coactivators of fimY expression. Consistent with these results, there is no transcription from a fimY-lacZ
reporter construct within a serovar Typhimurium fimY or
fimZ mutant. Studies using the fimY-lacZ
construct reveal that expression of this gene varies with environmental
conditions in a manner similar to fimA expression. Extensive in vitro DNA binding assays using extracts from E. coli that overexpress FimY, as well as partially purified FimY,
were unable to identify a specific interaction between FimY and the fimA or fimY promoter. The results indicate
that FimY is a positive regulator of fimbrial expression and that this
protein acts in cooperation with FimZ to regulate the expression of
Salmonella type 1 fimbrial appendages.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Type 1 fimbriae are bacterial
adhesins characterized by their ability to mediate mannose-sensitive
binding to eukaryotic cells in vitro. These fimbriae are common
adherence factors expressed by both Escherichia coli and
Salmonella and have been detected on many other members of
the family Enterobacteriaceae (7, 16, 35).
Numerous studies of E. coli have established the importance
of type I fimbriae as virulence factors during urinary tract infections
(2, 13, 30, 40). In Salmonella, these appendages
have been implicated in initiating intestinal colonization, and they
may contribute to tissue tropism by adhering to specific mannosylated
host proteins (3, 20, 37, 51). In addition, type 1 fimbriae
of Salmonella are known to mediate binding to a number of
human epithelial cell lines in vitro (4, 19, 29, 32, 51).
The phenotypic expression of type 1 fimbriae is phase variable,
allowing a transition between fimbriate and nonfimbriate phenotypes
(1, 17, 21). Serial subculturing of bacteria in static
liquid broth has been reported to select for highly fimbriate bacteria,
while growth on solid media selects for poorly fimbriate bacteria
(15, 42). Fimbrial phase variation in E. coli is
due, in part, to inversion of a 314-bp DNA element found upstream of
the gene encoding the major fimbrial subunit, fimA
(1). This inversion event requires the action of two
site-specific recombinases, fimB and fimE,
located upstream of the fim structural genes (22,
33).
In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, variation of
type 1 fimbrial expression appears to occur through a mechanism
distinct from that described in E. coli (10).
Regardless of the fimbrial phenotype, the fimA promoter
region was found to be oriented in the direction that would promote
fimA transcription (10). In addition, fimbriate
E. coli strains lysogenized with a serovar Typhimurium
fimA lacZ fusion produce no detectable
-galactosidase activity, indicating that E. coli Fim proteins do not
activate serovar Typhimurium fimA expression
(47). Four genes, located within the serovar Typhimurium
fim gene cluster, have been implicated as regulators of
fimA expression (47). The gene products from two
of these genes, fimZ and fimW, exhibit a
relatedness to prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, and one,
fimU, encodes an arginine tRNA molecule that is known to
effect both serovar Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica
serovar Enteritidis type 1 fimbrial expression (12, 50).
There are no apparent homologues to the E. coli recombinases
FimB and FimE within the serovar Typhimurium gene cluster, and no genes
for regulatory proteins related to FimZ, -Y, or -W have been found
within the E. coli fim gene cluster (48).
A serovar Typhimurium fimZ mutant was constructed previously
and found to be phenotypically nonfimbriate. In addition, this mutant
demonstrated significantly decreased levels of fimA
expression when compared to the parental strain (54). The
FimZ protein was partially purified and found to bind to the promoter
region of fimA, approximately 100 bp upstream of the
transcription initiation site. Amino acid sequence analysis revealed
that FimZ is related to a number of transcriptional activators,
including BvgA, a response regulator of a two-component system in
Bordetella pertussis that activates several virulence
factors in that organism (14). Similar to FimZ, the
C-terminal amino acid sequence of FimY appears to contain a
helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, yet examination of the entire FimY
sequence identifies very limited homology to known prokaryotic
proteins. Previously we have demonstrated that both FimZ and FimY are
necessary for fimA expression in a recombinant E. coli host (54). Here we report the construction and
characterization of a fimY mutant in serovar Typhimurium.
The nonfimbriate phenotype of this mutant and the location of the FimY
gene within the fim gene cluster on the chromosome, as well
as the requirement for a functional FimY to mediate fimA
expression, imply the involvement of this protein in fimbrial
regulation. To further define the role of FimY, a fimY-lacZ
reporter was constructed. Similar to expression of fimA,
fimY expression requires the presence of both FimY and FimZ.
In addition, expression of fimY is increased under environmental conditions that also promote fimA expression.
Attempts to identify a FimY binding site on the fimA
promoter region using in vitro DNA binding assays were unsuccessful,
suggesting that other Salmonella proteins may be necessary
for the action of FimY. The results reported here support the model in
which serovar Typhimurium fimA expression requires both FimY
and FimZ and these proteins are essential components of the regulatory
cascade involved in fimbrial production.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media.
The strains and
recombinant molecules used in this study are shown in Table
1. The fimbriate strain serovar
Typhimurium LB5010 (8) was used to construct the
fimY mutant, LBY100. The mutation was subsequently
introduced into the strongly fimbriate and invasive serovar Typhimurium
strain SL1344 by P22 transduction using lysates of serovar Typhimurium
LBY100 (44). Serovar Typhimurium IS145 is a
fimA
lacZ lysogen used as a single-copy reporter of fimA expression, and its construction has been described previously (47). Construction and characterization of the
fimZ mutant LBZ100 has been reported previously
(54). The fimZ mutation was also transduced into
serovar Typhimurium SL1344 to generate the strain SL1344JTZ. All
strains were cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium and incubated at
37°C, or 30°C for lysogens, for 24 or 48 h. Plasmids were
prepared by standard techniques, and manipulation of recombinant DNA
was performed using conventional procedures (44). All
plasmids used in this study are derivatives of pISF101 carrying the
serovar Typhimurium fim gene cluster cloned into pACYC184
(New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.), as shown in Fig.
1.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Genetic organization of the Salmonella fim
gene cluster. The sizes of the polypeptides encoded by the genes are
shown below the boxes. fimA (A) is the gene encoding the
major fimbrial subunit, whereas fimZ (Z) and fimY
(Y) are those described in the text. The arrows indicate the direction
of transcription as determined by S1 nuclease mapping for
fimA, primer extension analysis for fimZ and
fimW (W), and sequence analysis for fimY. The
derivatives of pISF101 utilized in this study are indicated below the
map, with solid lines representing the DNA retained by each derivative.
For pISF187, -189, and -217, the crosses indicate the locations of the
inserted translation terminators.
|
|
The construction of plasmids pISF182, pISF187, and pISF189 has been
described previously (54). The plasmid pISF215 possesses only the fimY gene of the fim gene cluster and
was constructed following digestion of pISF101 with BamHI
and BglII and religation to remove all fim genes
except fimY. The plasmid pISF217 was constructed by
insertion of a universal translation terminator into a unique EcoRV site within fimY on pISF215. The
fimA-lacZ (pISF145) and fimY-lacZ (pISF234)
multicopy reporter constructs were generated by ligating a PCR product
of the respective promoter regions into the promoterless
lacZ vector, pMC1403 (9). Single-copy
lacZ reporters were constructed using an
ampicillin-resistant derivative of the single-copy pDF41 plasmid
ligated to the promoterless lacZ, -Y, and
-A genes from pMC1403 (25). This plasmid,
designated pGS375 (kindly supplied by George Stauffer, University of
Iowa) was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and
ligated to a PCR product of the fimY promoter region to
generate a single-copy fimY-lacZ reporter (pISF237). All
plasmids were sequenced through the fusion to confirm the fidelity of
the construct.
Detection of type 1 fimbriae.
Bacteria were serially
subcultured in 10 ml of LB broth and incubated without shaking for
48 h to select for highly fimbriate cultures. The cells were
harvested by centrifugation and gently resuspended in the residual
fluid as described previously (15, 41). Subsequently, 50 µl of bacterial suspension was mixed with 50 µl of a 3% (vol/vol)
suspension of guinea pig erythrocytes in phosphate-buffered saline.
Mannose-sensitive hemagglutination was determined by incubation of the
bacterial suspension with cells resuspended in phosphate-buffered
saline containing 3% (wt/vol)
-methyl-D-mannoside. The
mannose-sensitive adhesin was considered to be present if the red blood
cells agglutinated only in the absence of mannose within 1 min.
Fimbrial antigens were detected using monospecific serovar Typhimurium
antifimbrial serum as described previously (26). The titers
of the hemagglutination and antibody agglutination reactions were
determined as the reciprocal of the highest bacterial or serum dilution
resulting in hemagglutination or bacterial agglutination, respectively,
and they are described in detail elsewhere (11). For
transmission electron microscopy, aliquots of 48-h bacterial
suspensions were placed on carbon-coated grids and stained for 1 min
with phosphotungstic acid before visualization at 50,000× or 20,000×
with a Hitachi H-600 electron microscope (24).
Construction of the serovar Typhimurium fimY
mutant.
The plasmid pIS182, which possesses an intact
fimY gene (Fig. 1), was linearized at a unique
EcoRV site within fimY. A HincII digest of a DNA cassette containing a kanamycin resistance determinant, isolated from the plasmid pUC4K (Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.), was
prepared and subsequently ligated into the fimY gene at the EcoRV site. Following isolation of kanamycin-resistant
E. coli HB101 (6) transformants, the plasmid
carrying the insertionally inactive fimY gene was isolated
by standard techniques (44). The disrupted fimY
determinant was then cloned into the suicide vector pGP704 (kindly
supplied by John Mekalanos, Harvard Medical School) and maintained in
the permissive E. coli host, SY327 (39). Recombinant DNA was prepared from kanamycin- and ampicillin-resistant transformants and analyzed by restriction digestions. The appropriate construct was then introduced into serovar Typhimurium LB5010, and
kanamycin-resistant but ampicillin-sensitive transformants were
selected. Further analysis of putative fimY mutants was
completed by Southern hybridization using random-primed dUTP-labeled
DNA probes (Genius kit; Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.)
specific for the fimY gene or the kanamycin-resistant
determinant. Chromosomal DNA was digested to completion with
BglII and transferred to nitrocellulose. All hybridizations
were performed under high-stringency conditions as described elsewhere
(24).
-Galactosidase assays.
Assays for
-galactosidase were
performed in triplicate by the method of Miller (38), using
the chloroform-sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis procedure, and
fimA lacZ lysogens or fimA lacZ and fimY
lacZ plasmid transformants. The strains were grown on LB agar for
24 h or in static liquid LB broth for 48 h before analysis.
Subcultures were performed by transferring one loopful of cells to a
second 10-ml broth culture or picking one colony and replating. All
assays were performed independently at least twice with less than 20% variability.
Partial purification of the FimY-maltose-binding protein fusion
and gel mobility shift assays.
The plasmid pISF241 was used to
purify a FimY-maltose-binding protein fusion. pISF241 was constructed
from the vector pMal-c2 (New England Biolabs), which contains the
-galactosidase coding region fused to the maltose-binding protein of
E. coli. The
-galactosidase gene was removed by digestion
with BamHI and PstI, and the remaining vector was
ligated to a PCR product of the fimY coding region digested
with BamHI and PstI. The resulting construct was
confirmed by sequencing it through the junction. pISF241 was introduced into E. coli JM109 and grown at room temperature to an
optical density at 600 nm of ~0.5 before induction with 0.5 mM IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside). The culture was
allowed to grow for an additional 12 h at room temperature before
the cells were collected and harvested by sonication and resuspended in
column buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). The
FimY-maltose-binding protein fusion was separated from the crude
extract by binding to an amylose-agarose bead resin and eluted from the
resin by washing with column buffer plus 10 mM maltose, according to
the manufacturer's instructions.
Gel mobility shift assays were performed with various concentrations of
the above-described FimY preparation as well as various concentrations
of crude extracts from E. coli JM109 transformed with
pISF215 or pISF217 (described above). The preparation of the 452-bp
fimA promoter region used as target DNA has been described elsewhere (49). A 564-bp DNA fragment containing the
fimY promoter was generated by PCR. End labeling was
performed by removing the 5' phosphate from the promoter fragments with
calf intestine alkaline phosphatase and then incubating the fragments
with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [
-32P]ATP. Assays
were performed by standard techniques (23), except that 0.25 µg of unlabeled single-stranded sperm carrier DNA was added to each
incubation mixture and no bovine serum albumin was added. The DNA was
subsequently mixed with appropriate twofold dilutions (up to 5 µg) of
FimY protein extracts, and all volumes were adjusted with sterile
distilled water. The samples were loaded onto a nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed at 200 V. The mobilities of the
DNA fragments were analyzed by autoradiography. In all experiments, the
concentration of protein was determined by the use of a commercially
available Bradford protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.).
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of the fimY mutant of serovar Typhimurium
LB5010.
The fimY mutant, serovar Typhimurium LBY100,
was constructed following transformation of serovar Typhimurium LB5010
with the suicide vector, pGP704, carrying an insertionally inactive
fimY gene. Kanamycin-resistant and ampicillin-sensitive
bacteria that had retained the inactivated gene but lost the plasmid
vector were isolated and further analyzed. Genomic DNA was prepared
from both the parental and the mutant strains and used in Southern hybridization analysis to confirm the location of the mutated allele
(Fig. 2). Genomic preparations were
restricted with BglII and hybridized to a 1,300-bp DNA probe
possessing the kanamycin resistance gene. In addition, the restricted
DNA was probed with a 470-bp DNA fragment comprising nucleotides of the
fimY gene itself. The probe possessing the resistance
determinant hybridized to a 3.9-kb DNA fragment found only in serovar
Typhimurium LBY100, and no sequences homologous to the probe were
detected in the parental strain. The size of this fragment is
consistent with replacement of the parental allele with the
fimY mutation. The fimY DNA probe hybridized to a
4.0-kb BglII DNA fragment from serovar Typhimurium LBY100
and a 2.7-kb fragment from serovar Typhimurium LB5010. The sizes of
these fragments are consistent with insertion of the 1.3-kb kanamycin
resistance cassette, which lacks a BglII restriction site,
into the chromosome of serovar Typhimurium LBY100 and replacement of
the intact fimY gene by allelic exchange. Confirmation of
the location of the mutant allele was performed by additional
restriction analysis using several endonucleases.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Southern hybridization profiles of genomic DNA isolated
from serovar Typhimurium LB5010 (wild type) and LBY100
(fimY). (A) DNA digested with BglII and probed
with sequences from the Kanr cassette. (B) DNA digested
with BglII and probed with a fimY gene probe. The
sizes of the DNA fragments are as shown.
|
|
Characterization of the fimY mutant of serovar
Typhimurium LB5010.
The ability of the fimY mutant to
mediate mannose-sensitive hemagglutination of guinea pig erythrocytes
was investigated. Serovar Typhimurium LBY100 was grown under optimal
conditions for the expression of type I fimbriae, and unlike the
parental strain, the bacteria were unable to mediate hemagglutination
even after multiple subcultures in static liquid broth. In addition, the strain was examined for its reactivity with a fimbria-specific antiserum and observed under the transmission electron microscope. These results are summarized in Table 2,
and they demonstrate that serovar Typhimurium LBY100 does not express
surface-associated type 1 fimbriae under conditions that normally
promote the expression of these appendages. Serovar Typhimurium LBY100
was never observed to express type 1 fimbriae on its surface regardless
of culture conditions. Figure 3 shows a
transmission electron micrograph of the nonfimbriate LBY100
fimY mutant and the fimbriate LB5010 parental strain after
48 h of growth in static liquid broth.

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Transmission electron micrographs of the fimbriate
serovar Typhimurium LB5010 parental strain (A) and the nonfimbriate
serovar Typhimurium LBY100 fimY mutant (B). Magnification,
×32,000.
|
|
To insure that insertion of the kanamycin cassette on the chromosome
did not result in abrogation of fimZ expression, serovar Typhimurium LBY100 was transformed with a plasmid carrying the fimY gene alone (pISF215) as well as a plasmid carrying a
mutation in the fimY gene (pISF217). The pISF215 plasmid was
able to restore type 1 fimbrial expression in the fimY
mutant, as evidenced by hemagglutination and reactivity with
fimbria-specific antiserum. Unlike the parental strain, expression of
fimbriae in the pISF215 transformant was constitutive and occurred
under all conditions, most likely due to the high level of FimY
produced by the gene carried on the multicopy plasmid. The gene carried
on pISF217 was not able to restore the fimbrial phenotype to serovar
Typhimurium LBY100, as summarized in Table 2. The plasmid pISF215 could
not restore fimbriation to a previously characterized strain, serovar Typhimurium LBZ100 (54), that carries a fimZ
mutation on its chromosome.
The fimY mutation of serovar Typhimurium LBY100 was
introduced, by P22 phage transduction, into a second strain of
serovar Typhimurium, SL1344. This strain, designated SL1344JTY, was
also found to be nonfimbriate even after serial subcultures in static broth and could be complemented by transformation with a functional fimY gene (Table 2).
Expression of
-galactosidase by a fimA-lacZ reporter
in serovar Typhimurium LBY100.
The serovar Typhimurium
fimA lacZ lysogen, which has been described previously
(47), was used as a source of recombinant phage to generate
a
fimA lacZ lysogen of the LBY100 mutant. Table 3 shows the results of
-galactosidase
expression by the serovar Typhimurium LBY100 lysogen grown under
conditions normally favoring optimal fimbrial expression or on solid
medium, which is known to select for poorly fimbriate bacteria. There
was no detectable
-galactosidase activity by the fimY
mutant regardless of the conditions of growth. In contrast, the
parental strain of serovar Typhimurium exhibited previously reported
levels of enzyme expression consistent with a fimbriate strain when
grown in broth, compared to lower but detectable levels of expression
when grown on agar (47). Transformation of the serovar
Typhimurium LBY100 lysogen with pISF215, carrying a functional copy of
fimY, resulted in constitutively high levels of
fimA expression regardless of the conditions of growth.
Transformation of the lysogen with plasmids carrying a nonfunctional
fimY gene (pISF217) resulted in strains that did not produce
detectable
-galactosidase activity. Even the multicopy plasmid
carrying the fimA-lacZ fusion (47) did not
express detectable levels of
-galactosidase when introduced into
serovar Typhimurium LBY100, regardless of the conditions of culture
(data not shown).
Expression of
-galactosidase from the fimYlacZ
reporter in E. coli and serovar Typhimurium.
To
investigate the level of fimY expression, a 564-bp PCR
fragment containing the fimY promoter region was fused to a
promoterless lacZ gene carried on a single-copy replicon.
This plasmid, designated pISF237, was used to investigate
fimY expression in an E. coli host lacking genes
that affect Salmonella fim expression, as shown in Table
4. No expression was observed when this
fusion was introduced by itself into E. coli JM109,
indicating that no E. coli proteins are able to
independently activate expression of the serovar Typhimurium fimY gene. The addition of plasmids carrying a functional
fimZ or fimY gene (pISF187 or pISF189,
respectively) into E. coli carrying the fimY-lacZ
fusion did not significantly increase fimY expression. However, pISF182, carrying both fimZ and fimY,
resulted in a 70-fold increase in fimY expression. We have
previously reported that fimA expression is dependent on the
presence of both FimZ and FimY in a similar manner (54).
Similar results were obtained when a multicopy fimY-lacZ
fusion was introduced into E. coli and compared to strains
transformed with pISF187, pISF189, and pISF182 (data not shown).
The requirement for the presence of both FimY and FimZ to activate
fimY expression was confirmed by analysis using the
fimY-lacZ reporter in serovar Typhimurium SL1344 and the
SL1344 fimY and fimZ mutants. As shown in Table
4, detectable levels of
-galactosidase are expressed when serovar
Typhimurium SL1344, with the fimY-lacZ reporter, is cultured
in broth for 48 h. In contrast, there is no expression from the
fimY promoter in a fimY or fimZ
background. These strains were also transformed with the multicopy
fimY-lacZ fusion, and a consistent pattern of expression was
observed (data not shown).
Analysis of fimA and fimY expression after
multiple serial subcultures.
To determine if high levels of
fimY expression correlate with high levels of
fimA expression under conditions that select for strongly
fimbriate bacteria, serial liquid subcultures of serovar Typhimurium
SL1344, containing the fimA-lacZ or fimY-lacZ fusion, were analyzed. As shown in Fig.
4, three successive 48-h subcultures in
broth resulted in an increase in fimY and fimA expression, as detected by the
-galactosidase assay. On the third subculture, the strains were transferred from broth onto agar plates
and assayed after three successive 24-h subcultures. Both fimA and fimY expression dropped sharply after
plating onto solid medium. This experiment was performed multiple times
with a consistent decrease (
3-fold) in gene expression from both
fusions when the strains were transferred to solid medium. The
difference between expression levels in broth and those observed for
agar-grown bacteria was always greater for fimY, suggesting
that this gene may be more responsive to environmental signals. These
results are consistent with the function of FimY as an activator of
fimA expression. In addition, the ability of these cultures
to decrease expression of fimA following overnight growth on
agar correlates with the change in fimbrial phenotype and indicates
that this change occurs, at least in part, as a result of differential
transcription of fimY and fimA.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
fimA-lacZ (pISF145) and fimY-lacZ
(pISF234) reporter plasmids were transformed into serovar Typhimurium
SL1344 and assayed for -galactosidase activity after multiple serial
subcultures. The results represent the mean + standard deviation
for one series assayed in triplicate.
|
|
Partial purification of FimY for use in in vitro DNA binding
assays.
FimY was partially purified by construction of a fusion
with the E. coli maltose-binding protein and separation of
this fusion protein from crude extracts on an amylose-agarose bead
resin. Figure 5 shows the sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the resulting
protein extract after elution from the resin. The protein eluted from
the column was approximately 70.5 kDa, consistent with fusion of the
27.8-kDa FimY protein and the 42.7 kDa maltose-binding protein. Up to 5 µg of this extract was combined with radiolabeled fimA or
fimY containing promoter DNA fragments in gel mobility shift
assays, and no altered mobility was observed compared to controls.
However, the plasmid (pISF241) used to express the FimY fusion protein
was introduced into serovar Typhimurium LBY100 and restored the ability
of the mutant to mediate hemagglutination and express fimbriae. Also,
in the presence of FimZ encoded by pISF187, the FimY fusion could
activate expression of the fimA reporter constructs (Table
3). These results indicated that the N-terminal fusion with the
maltose-binding protein did not severely alter the functional activity
of FimY in vivo. Additional DNA binding assays were performed using
crude extracts generated from E. coli transformed with
pISF215(fimY+) or pISF217(fimY).
These assays were also unable to detect a specific interaction between
the fim promoters and FimY.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
SDS-PAGE of partially purified FimY-maltose-binding
protein fusion. Lane 1, molecular mass standards; lane 2, amylose resin
column flowthrough; lane 3, amylose resin wash; lane 4, 5 µg of FimY
fusion eluate ( 70.5 kDa). Arrow indicates FimY-maltose-binding
protein.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous studies using recombinant E. coli strains have
indicated that the presence of two regulatory proteins, FimZ and FimY, is necessary for activation of the serovar Typhimurium fimA
gene (54). These studies also reported the construction of a
serovar Typhimurium fimZ mutant and determined that this
strain was phenotypically nonfimbriate even under conditions favoring
fimbriation. To confirm the role of fimY as a positive
regulator of fimbrial expression, a fimY mutant was
constructed and characterized. Similar to the fimZ mutant,
the fimY mutant was found to be nonfimbriate and expressed
significantly reduced levels of fimA expression under all
conditions studies. The lack of production of FimA subunits by this
mutant was not due to a polar effect on fimZ expression, since a positive fimbrial phenotype, and concomitant fimA
expression, could be restored following transformation of the
fimY mutant with plasmids carrying only the fimY
gene. The fimY mutation was introduced, following
transduction, into serovar Typhimurium SL1344. Serovar Typhimurium
SL1344 is invasive, strongly fimbriate, and, unlike LT2 strains of
serovar Typhimurium, has been used extensively to investigate
virulence. The serovar Typhimurium SL1344 fimY mutant was
also observed to be nonfimbriate under all conditions, confirming that
the FimY polypeptide plays a crucial role in fimbrial expression in two
independent isolates.
Expression of fimY itself was analyzed by construction of a
fimY-lacZ reporter. The results shown in Table 4 indicate
that FimY is an autoregulatory protein but that this activation is only
achievable when FimZ is present. Thus expression of fimY, similar to expression of fimA, was determined to be
dependent upon the presence of both fimY and fimZ
gene products, supporting the roles of these two proteins as
coregulators of fimbrial production. Expression of fimY was
also investigated following growth under conditions favoring
fimbriation and was found to respond to these environmental conditions
in a manner similar to fimA expression. In contrast to
fimA, however, greater differences in fimY
expression were observed when bacteria were grown in liquid media
compared to growth on solid media. These results are consistent with a model in which the expression of fimY is influenced by
environmental conditions in a regulatory cascade upstream of
fimA. In addition, the overproduction of FimY results in
constitutive expression of type 1 fimbriae, and similar observations
have been made following overexpression of FimZ (54). These
studies indicate that the concentrations of both FimY and FimZ in vivo
may be critical for fimA regulation and fimbrial expression
by the bacteria.
Our observations support the role of FimY as an activator of
fimA expression. However, extensive in vitro DNA binding
studies, under conditions in which FimZ has previously been shown to
bind to the fimA promoter, were unable to establish a
specific interaction between FimY and the fimA or
fimY promoter regions. The inability to bind FimY to these
DNA fragments suggests that other Salmonella factors are
necessary for the transcriptional activity of this protein, and one or
more of these factors may not be available in the binding assays used
in these studies. For example, FimZ may be essential, in vivo, for the
binding of FimY to a specific region of DNA. Alternatively, FimY may
not be a DNA binding protein at all, but it may instead interact with
FimZ in a manner that activates FimZ for binding to the promoter region
of fimA. Studies analyzing FimZ-FimY protein interactions
are currently under way in our laboratory.
Previously, we have reported that FimZ is a positive activator of
fimA expression and that this activation is mediated by FimZ
binding to the promoter region of fimA (54). The
precise binding site of FimZ has been shown to extend from 47 to 100 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of fimA
(unpublished data). Consistent with the observed binding, in vitro, of
purified FimZ to the fimA promoter region is the amino acid
sequence relatedness of FimZ to BvgA, a transcriptional regulator of
virulence gene expression in B. pertussis (14,
46). BvgA is a sensory response regulator that, along with the
sensor kinase BvgS, makes up a two-component regulatory system in
B. pertussis. Frequently, both components are encoded by
contiguous genes on the bacterial chromosome (27). However,
a complete two-component system is unlikely to be found within the
fim gene cluster, since fimZ is flanked by fimF, a gene encoding a polypeptide required for fimbrial
assembly (34, 36), and fimY. Examination of the
amino acid sequence of the entire FimY polypeptide indicates that this
protein has limited homology to prokaryotic transcriptional regulators
and no apparent homology to sensory regulators of two-component
systems. Closer examination of the C-terminal region of FimY reveals
the presence of conserved kinase phosphorylation sites, suggesting that
the action of this protein could depend upon phosphorylation. The
inability to identify a specific binding site on the fimA promoter, even in the presence of phosphorylating agents, such as
acetyl phosphate, may indicate that FimY acts within a unique phosphorelay system (31, 43, 52). However, it is unlikely that fimY encodes a traditional sensor kinase component,
since it is uncharacteristically small and contains no apparent
transmembrane domains.
The overexpression of FimY in Salmonella results in
constitutive production of fimbriae on the surfaces of bacteria, since transformants of serovar Typhimurium LBY100 expressing fimY
on a multicopy plasmid are fimbriate regardless of culture conditions. These transformants have lost the ability to vary phenotypic expression of type 1 fimbriae, and expression of fimA is constitutively
high in this strain, similar to what has been detected in serovar
Typhimurium producing large amounts of FimZ (54).
Consequently, fimbrial phase variation may be modulated, at least in
part, by the relative intracellular concentrations of regulators such
as FimZ and FimY. However, additional fim genes are known to
affect the ability of serovar Typhimurium to produce fimbriae
(47), and the regulation of fimA expression is
also influenced by the activity of the fimW and
fimU genes specifically. In addition, global regulators,
such as LRP, IHF, and HN-S, have been shown to affect fimA
expression in E. coli (5, 18, 45), whereas little
is known about the ability of this group of molecules to control
fimA expression in Salmonella. In order to fully
understand the molecular mechanisms of serovar Typhimurium
fimA expression, each component of the fimA
regulon will have to be examined individually. To date, our investigations have indicated that FimZ and FimY are positive coactivators of fimA that are necessary for the formation of
fimbrial appendages on the surfaces of the bacteria and act at the
level of fimA expression. One of these proteins, FimZ, has
been established as a DNA binding protein (54), whereas FimY
demonstrates no specific binding to the fimA promoter
region. Nonetheless, both proteins appear to be critical for
fimA expression and thus fimbrial formation in serovar Typhimurium.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the National Research
Initiative of the USDA (97-35204-4616) and a predoctoral fellowship to
J.K.T. from a National Institutes of Health Parasitism Training Grant
(TE AI07511).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. Phone: (319) 335-7778. Fax: (319) 335-9006. E-mail:
steven-clegg{at}uiowa.edu.
Editor:
J. T. Barbieri
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abraham, J. M.,
C. S. Freitag,
J. R. Clements, and B. I. Eisenstein.
1985.
An invertible element of DNA that controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:5724-5727[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Abraham, S. N.,
J. P. Babu,
C. S. Giampapa,
D. L. Hasty,
W. A. Simpson, and E. H. Beachey.
1985.
Protection against Escherichia coli-induced urinary tract infections with hybridoma antibodies directed against type 1 fimbriae or complementary D-mannose receptors.
Infect. Immun.
48:625-628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Aslanzadeh, J., and L. J. Paulissen.
1992.
Role of type 1 and type 3 fimbriae on the adherence and pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis in mice.
Microbiol. Immunol.
36:351-359[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Baumler, A. J.,
R. M. Tsolis, and F. Heffron.
1996.
Contribution of fimbrial operons to attachment to and invasion of epithelial cell lines by Salmonella typhimurium.
Infect. Immun.
64:1862-1865[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Blomfield, I. C.,
P. J. Calie,
K. J. Eberhardt,
M. S. McClain, and B. I. Eisenstein.
1993.
Lrp stimulates phase variation of type 1 fimbriation in Escherichia coli K-12.
J. Bacteriol.
175:27-36[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Boyer, H. W., and S. Roulland-Dussoix.
1969.
A complementary analysis of the restriction and modification of DNA in Escherichia coli.
J. Mol. Biol.
41:459-472[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Buchanan, K.,
S. Falkow,
R. A. Hull, and S. I. Hull.
1985.
Frequency among Enterobacteriaceae of the DNA sequences encoding type 1 pili.
J. Bacteriol.
162:799-803[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bullas, L. R., and J. Ryu.
1983.
Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains are r m+ for all three chromosomally located systems of DNA restriction and modification.
J. Bacteriol.
156:471-474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Casadaban, M. J.,
J. Chou, and S. Cohen.
1980.
In vitro gene fusions that join an enzymatically active -galactosidase segment to amino-terminal fragments of exogenous proteins: Escherichia coli plasmid vectors for the detection and cloning of translational initiation signals.
J. Bacteriol.
143:971-980[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Clegg, S.,
L. S. Hancox, and K.-S. Yeh.
1996.
Salmonella typhimurium phase variation and FimA expression.
J. Bacteriol.
178:542-545[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Clegg, S.,
B. K. Purcell, and J. Pruckler.
1987.
Characterization of genes encoding type 1 fimbriae of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhimurium, and Serratia marcescens.
Infect. Immun.
55:281-287[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Clouthier, S. C.,
S. K. Collinson,
A. P. White,
P. A. Banser, and W. W. Kay.
1998.
tRNA(Arg) (fimU) and expression of SEF 14 and SEF 21 in Salmonella enteritidis.
J. Bacteriol.
180:840-845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Connel, H.,
W. Agace,
P. Klemm,
M. Schembri,
S. Marild, and C. Svanborg.
1996.
Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9827-9832[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Cotter, P. A., and J. F. Miller.
1994.
BvgAS-mediated signal transduction: analysis of phase locked regulatory mutants of Bordetella bronchiseptica in a rabbit model.
Infect. Immun.
62:3381-3390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Duguid, J. P.,
E. S. Anderson, and I. Campbell.
1966.
Fimbriae and adhesive properties in Salmonellae.
J. Pathol. Bacteriol.
92:107-138[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Duguid, J. P., and R. R. Gillies.
1958.
Fimbriae and haemagglutinating activity in Salmonella, Klebsiella, Proteus and Chromobacterium.
J. Pathol. Bacteriol.
75:517-519.
|
| 17.
|
Eisenstein, B. I.
1981.
Phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli is under transcriptional control.
Science
214:337-338[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Eisenstein, B. L.,
D. S. Sweet,
V. Vaughn, and D. I. Friedman.
1987.
Integration host factor is required for the inversion that controls phase variation in Escherichia coli.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:6506-6510[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Ernst, R. K.,
D. M. Dombroski, and J. M. Merrick.
1990.
Anaerobiosis, type 1 fimbriae, and growth phase are factors that affect invasion of Hep-2 cells by Salmonella typhimurium.
Infect. Immun.
58:2014-2016[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Ewen, S. W.,
P. J. Naughton,
G. Grant,
M. Sojka,
E. Allen-Vercoe,
S. Bardoz,
C. J. Thorns, and A. Pusztaj.
1997.
Salmonella enterica var. Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica var. Enteritidis express type 1 fimbriae in the rat in vivo.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
18:185-192[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Freitag, C. S.,
J. M. Abraham,
J. R. Clements, and B. I. Eisenstein.
1985.
Genetic analysis of the phase variation control of expression of type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli.
J. Bacteriol.
162:668-675[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Gally, D. L.,
J. Leathart, and I. C. Blomfield.
1996.
Interaction of FimB and FimE with the fim switch that controls the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in E. coli K-12.
Mol. Microbiol.
21:725-738[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Garner, M., and A. Revzin.
1981.
A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of the E. coli lactose operon regulatory system.
Nucleic Acids Res.
9:3047-3060[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Gerlach, G.-F.,
S. Clegg,
N. J. Ness,
D. L. Swenson,
B. L. Allen, and W. A. Nichols.
1989.
Expression of type 1 fimbriae and mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin by recombinant plasmids.
Infect. Immun.
57:764-770[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Ghrist, A. C., and G. V. Stauffer.
1995.
Characterization of the Escherichia coli gcvR gene encoding a negative regulator of gcv expression.
J. Bacteriol.
177:4980-4984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Hancox, L. S.,
K.-S. Yeh, and S. Clegg.
1998.
Construction and characterization of type 1 non-fimbriate and non-adhesive mutants of Salmonella typhimurium.
FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.
19:289-296.
|
| 27.
|
Hoch, J. A., and T. J. Silhavy.
1995.
Two-component signal transduction.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 28.
|
Hoiseth, S. K., and B. A. D. Stocker.
1981.
Aromatic-dependent Salmonella typhimurium are non-virulent and effective as live vaccines.
Nature
291:238-239[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Horiuchi, S.,
Y. Inagaki,
N. Okamura,
R. Nakaya, and N. Yamamoto.
1992.
Type 1 pili enhance the invasion of Salmonella braenderup and Salmonella typhimurium to HeLa cells.
Microbiol. Immunol.
36:593-602[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Hultgren, S. J.,
W. R. Schwan,
A. J. Schaeffer, and J. L. Duncan.
1985.
Role of type 1 pili and effects of phase variation on lower urinary tract infections produced by Escherichia coli.
Infect. Immun.
50:370-377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Ishige, K.,
S. Nagasawa,
S. Tokishita, and T. Mizuno.
1994.
A novel device of bacterial signal transducers.
EMBO J.
13:5195-5202[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Jones, G. W., and L. A. Richardson.
1981.
The attachment to and invasion of HeLa cells by Salmonella typhimurium: the contribution of mannose-sensitive and mannose resistant haemagglutinating activities.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
127:361-370[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Klemm, P.
1986.
Two regulatory fim genes, fimB and fimE, control the phase variation of type 1 fimbriae in E. coli.
EMBO J.
5:1389-1393[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Klemm, P., and G. Christiansen.
1987.
Three fim genes required for the regulation of length and mediation of adhesion of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
208:439-445[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Klemm, P., and K. A. Krogfelt.
1994.
Type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli, p. 9-26.
In
P. Klemm (ed.), Fimbriae: adhesion, genetics, biogenesis, and vaccines. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 36.
|
Krogfelt, K. A., and P. Klemm.
1988.
Investigation of minor components of Escherichia coli type 1 fimbriae: protein, chemical, and immunological aspects.
Microb. Pathog.
4:231-238[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Lindquist, B. L.,
E. Lebenthal,
P. C. Lee,
M. W. Stinson, and J. M. Merrick.
1987.
Adherence of Salmonella typhimurium to the small intestine of the rat.
Infect. Immun.
55:3044-3050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Miller, J. H.
1972.
Experiments in molecular genetics.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 39.
|
Miller, V. L., and J. J. Mekalanos.
1988.
A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires toxR.
J. Bacteriol.
170:2575-2583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Mulvey, M. A.,
Y. S. Lopez-Boado,
C. L. Wilson,
R. Roth,
W. C. Parks,
J. Heuser, and S. J. Hultgren.
1998.
Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1 piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli.
Science
282:1494-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Old, D. C.
1972.
Inhibition of the interaction between fimbrial haemagglutinins and erythrocytes by D-mannose and other carbohydrates.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
71:149-157[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Old, D. C., and J. P. Duguid.
1970.
Selective outgrowth of fimbriate bacteria in static liquid medium.
J. Bacteriol.
103:447-456[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Perraud, A. L.,
V. Wiess, and R. Gross.
1999.
Signalling pathways in two-component phosphorelay systems.
Trends Microbiol.
7:115-120[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 45.
|
Schembri, M. A.,
P. B. Olsen, and P. Klemm.
1998.
Orientation-dependent enhancement by H-NS of the activity of the type 1 fimbrial phase switch promoter in Escherichia coli.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
259:336-344[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Stibitz, S.
1994.
Mutations in the bvgA gene of Bordetella pertussis that differentially affect regulation of virulence determinants.
J. Bacteriol.
176:5615-5621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Swenson, D. L., and S. Clegg.
1992.
Identification of ancillary fim genes affecting fimA expression in Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Bacteriol.
174:7697-7704[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Swenson, D. L., and S. Clegg.
1994.
Salmonella fimbriae, p. 105-113.
In
P. Klemm (ed.), Fimbriae: adhesion, genetics, biogenesis and vaccines. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 49.
|
Swenson, D. L.,
S. Clegg, and D. C. Old.
1991.
The frequency of fim genes among Salmonella serovars.
Microb. Pathog.
10:487-492[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Swenson, D. L.,
K.-J. Kim,
E. W. Six, and S. Clegg.
1994.
The gene fimU affects expression of Salmonella type 1 fimbriae and is related to the E. coli tRNA gene argU.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
244:216-218[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Tavendale, A.,
C. K. H. Jardine,
D. C. Old, and J. P. Duguid.
1983.
Haemagglutinins and adhesion of Salmonella typhimurium to Hep-2 and Hela cells.
J. Med. Microbiol.
16:371-380[Abstract].
|
| 52.
|
Uhl, M. A., and J. F. Miller.
1996.
Central role of the BvgS receiver as a phosphorylated intermediate in a complex two-component phosphorelay.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:33176-33180[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
J. Vieira, and J. Messing.
1985.
Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors.
Gene
33:103-119[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Yeh, K.-S.,
L. S. Hancox, and S. Clegg.
1995.
Construction and characterization of a fimZ mutant of Salmonella typhimurium.
J. Bacteriol.
177:6861-6865[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, June 2000, p. 3305-3313, Vol. 68, No. 6
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
McFarland, K. A., Lucchini, S., Hinton, J. C. D., Dorman, C. J.
(2008). The Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein, Lrp, Activates Transcription of the fim Operon in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium via the fimZ Regulatory Gene. J. Bacteriol.
190: 602-612
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baxter, M. A., Jones, B. D.
(2005). The fimYZ Genes Regulate Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Invasion in Addition to Type 1 Fimbrial Expression and Bacterial Motility. Infect. Immun.
73: 1377-1385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Clegg, S., Hughes, K. T.
(2002). FimZ Is a Molecular Link between Sticking and Swimming in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol.
184: 1209-1213
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
NAUGHTON, P. J., GRANT, G., SOJKA, M., BARDOCZ, S., THORNS, C. J., PUSZTAI, A.
(2001). Survival and distribution of cell-free SEF 21 of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis in the stomach and various compartments of the rat gastrointestinal tract in vivo. J Med Microbiol
50: 1049-1054
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Edwards, R. A., Matlock, B. C., Heffernan, B. J., Maloy, S. R.
(2001). Genomic analysis and growth-phase-dependent regulation of the SEF14 fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Microbiology
147: 2705-2715
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tinker, J. K., Hancox, L. S., Clegg, S.
(2001). FimW Is a Negative Regulator Affecting Type 1 Fimbrial Expression in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol.
183: 435-442
[Abstract]
[Full Text]