Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2000, p. 4358-4360, Vol. 68, No. 7
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division
of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sassari,
Sassari, Italy
Received 31 January 2000/Returned for modification 16 March
2000/Accepted 11 April 2000
Adhesion of Trichomonas vaginalis is believed to be
dependent on four adhesion proteins, which are thought to bind to
vaginal epithelial cells in a specific manner with a ligand-receptor
type of interaction. However, the specific receptors on the host cell have not yet been identified. In this work, the ability of the T. vaginalis adhesins to bind to cells of different histologic derivations and from different species has been studied. HeLa, CHO, and
Vero cell lines; erythrocytes from different species; and a prokaryote
without a cell wall, Mycoplasma hominis, were employed in
order to investigate the cell specificity of the T. vaginalis adhesins. We observed that the T. vaginalis
adhesins are able to bind to the different cell types to the same
extent, suggesting that the host and tissue specificity of T. vaginalis adhesion should not be due to specificity of the
parasite adhesins. Our results suggest that the data published to date
on the subject are probably artifactual and that the experiments
reported in the literature are not appropriate for identification of
protozoan adhesins.
Trichomonas vaginalis is
a flagellated protozoan parasite responsible for one of the most
diffused sexually transmitted diseases. The microorganism parasitizes
the urogenital tract in humans, with high tissue and host specificity
(19). Adhesion of the protozoan to the host cell is the
primary step leading to cytopathogenicity, which is contact dependent
(16). In the past, several reports have described the
molecular characterization of the different steps involved in
interaction of the parasite with the human vaginal epithelial cells.
Adhesion of the parasite is thought to be mediated by four
trichomonad surface proteins, reportedly AP65, AP51, AP33, and AP23
(5, 6), which are believed to recognize specific proteins of the host by a ligand-receptor type of interaction (3,
7, 8), although the receptors in the host cell have not yet been
identified. The putative role of these proteins in adhesion has been
characterized by using HeLa cells, because of their epithelial nature
and the genital epithelium origin. Moreover, these cells appear more
susceptible to in vitro destruction by live T. vaginalis
than other cell types (4). Although Arroyo et al. (7,
8) were able to partially inhibit the binding of T. vaginalis to epithelial cells and to detect the adhesins on the
protozoan surface by using polyclonal antibodies, Brugerolle et al.
(10) recently demonstrated by immunogold staining with monoclonal antibodies that the putative adhesins are not localized on
the trichomonad surface, but are restricted to a hydrogenosomal function.
In this report, we have investigated the ability of the four putative
adhesins in binding to cells of different species and histologic
derivations in an attempt to assess whether the recognition of a
specific receptor in a particular cell type could be responsible for
the well-known tissue specificity of the parasite. Different cell
types, of human and nonhuman derivation, have been used: HeLa, CHO, and
Vero cell lines; human and rabbit erythrocytes; and a bacterium without
a cell wall, Mycoplasma hominis.
T. vaginalis cells of isolate SS-22 were cultured in
Diamond's TYM at 37°C in a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere
(13). HeLa, CHO, and Vero cells were cultured in RPMI under
the same conditions. The M. hominis strain PG21 was kindly
provided by S. Razin, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel, and was
cultured in SP4 medium (28). Human erythrocytes of different
groups were obtained from healthy human donors, and rabbit erythrocytes
were obtained by bleeding of experimental animals. Identification of
bound trichomonad proteins was performed by the same procedures used
for identification of the putative adhesins, in order to guarantee
homogeneous experimental conditions allowing for an appropriate
comparison of data (7). For the ligand assay experiments,
semiconfluent cell lines were detached by trypsinization, washed three
times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and counted. Washed cells
were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 1 h at 4°C under
the conditions described in the literature (7). M. hominis cells from an overnight culture were washed in PBS and
fixed as described for epithelial cells. In order to assess the extent
of binding of the solubilized adhesins to different cell types, fixed
HeLa, CHO, Vero, and M. hominis cells were incubated separately with total T. vaginalis proteins obtained by
solubilization as described by Alderete et al. (7). The
trichomonad proteins bound to fixed cells were detected as follows.
After an overnight incubation at 4°C with the solubilized trichomonad
proteins, fixed cells with the bound trichomonad proteins were
collected and washed five times with TDSET buffer (10 mM Tris [pH
8.00], 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5 mM
EDTA [pH 8.00], 1% Triton X-100), resuspended in Laemmli buffer
(21), and boiled, and the recovered proteins were loaded in
a 10% polyacrylamide gel for visualization. The whole procedure is
described in the literature as a "ligand assay" (7).
Figure 1A shows the T. vaginalis proteins that bind to fixed HeLa (lane 1), CHO (lane 2),
and Vero (lane 3) cells as a result of the ligand assays. As expected,
the proteins that adhered to HeLa cells (lane 1) have the same
molecular masses as the adhesion proteins described by Arroyo et
al.
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Host and Tissue Specificity of Trichomonas
vaginalis Is Not Mediated by Its Known Adhesion Proteins
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
AP65, AP51, AP33, and AP23 (7). As can be observed by
the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis patterns,
the four adhesins also bind to CHO and Vero cells. These cells were
obtained from hamsters and monkeys and were derived from tissues of
different types. Moreover, CHO cells are fibroblasts. Therefore, a
tissue specificity of the adhesin binding seems unlikely. More
surprisingly, the four proteins are able to bind to the same extent to
fixed mycoplasma cells (Fig. 1B), which, being prokaryotic, possess
extremely different surface structures compared to vaginal epithelial
cells.

View larger version (80K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) Representative ligand assays of T. vaginalis proteins obtained with fixed HeLa (lane 1), CHO (lane
2), and Vero (lane 3) cells. (B) Representative ligand assay of
T. vaginalis proteins obtained with fixed M. hominis cells. Cells were detached by trypsinization or collected
by centrifugation, washed, fixed with glutaraldehyde, and incubated
with total T. vaginalis proteins. The adhered trichomonad
proteins were detached by boiling fixed cells in Laemmli buffer,
subjected to electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels, and revealed
with Coomassie blue. Molecular mass markers (kilodaltons) are indicated
on the left.
In order to assess the extent of binding of the four proteins to nonfixed membranes, human and rabbit erythrocytes were used. Moreover, experiments were also performed after trypsinization of erythrocytes for digestion of the external protein domains (17). Erythrocytes were washed and prepared as described previously (18). The trichomonad proteins bound to both trypsinized and nontrypsinized erythrocytes were detected after coincubation of cells with total trichomonad proteins for 2 h, three washes in PBS, electrophoresis, and transfer onto nitrocellulose filters. The bound trichomonad proteins were revealed by incubation of the nitrocellulose filters with total anti-T. vaginalis antibodies (17).
When trypsinized and nontrypsinized human and rabbit erythrocytes were
used, the results obtained were the same as with the other cell types.
Figure 2 shows a representative
immunoblot pattern obtained with human trypsinized group 0 erythrocytes. Moreover, as reported previously by us (1,
17), two other adhesive proteins could be observed to bind to the
erythrocyte membrane, having molecular masses of 120 and 140 kDa (Fig.
2).
|
In order to assess that the proteins observed to bind to the different cell types were the same and that they were the four putative adhesins described for HeLa cells, T. vaginalis proteins bound to fixed HeLa cells as a result of a ligand assay were detached by boiling in Laemmli buffer, electrophoresed, and transferred onto nitrocellulose. The membrane filter containing the four putative adhesins was then incubated with total anti-T. vaginalis antibodies for 2 h and washed, and the bound antibodies were then eluted by incubation for 5 min with glycine buffer (200 mM glycine [pH 2.8]) and neutralized with 1 M imidazole (pH 7.8), as described previously (17). Ligand assays of T. vaginalis proteins performed with CHO, Vero, and mycoplasma cells and erythrocytes were then electrophoresed and transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter, which was probed with the eluted antiadhesin antibodies. The eluted antiadhesin antibodies recognized four T. vaginalis proteins bound to all of these cell types, with molecular masses of 65, 51, 33, and 23 kDa.
The results obtained in this work suggest that binding of the four T. vaginalis putative adhesins should not involve a protein receptor on the host cell, but rather an affinity for other structures. An affinity of the putative adhesins for membranes could be suggested. In fact, these proteins are able to bind to trypsinized cells. Moreover, two of the four adhesins, AP65 and AP33, have been characterized, and their sequences are known (6, 14, 25). As can be inferred from their protein sequences, which have a striking homology with the hydrogenosomal enzymes malic dehydrogenase (decarboxylating) (2, 6, 15, 22, 25) and succinyl coenzyme A synthetase (14, 23), respectively, these proteins could possess an intrinsic affinity for membranes. On the basis of these data, we can suppose that the use of solubilized proteins, instead of live intact parasites, as well as the use of trypsinized and glutaraldehyde-fixed epithelial cells, is not a more appropriate technique to detect adhesins. Therefore, the data suggest that the host and tissue specificity of T. vaginalis adhesion should not be dependent on the specificity of the four adhesins. It then seems likely that there must be other factors responsible for this specificity that could be researched in terms of other mechanisms of adhesion (9, 11, 12, 23), requirements for other recognition mechanisms (24, 27), or the need for factors such as hormones (26) or other molecules present in the vaginal environment (18). As a matter of fact, we cannot exclude that the tissue specificity is merely related to the fact that, following introduction into the genital tract, trichomonads can parasitize only vaginal cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants of The University of Sassari (Progetto di Ricerca sul 60%) and by the MURST (Cofinanziamento 1997).
The technical assistance of Edmondo Manca was greatly appreciated.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Experimental and Clinical Microbiology, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy. Phone: 011/39/079/228301. Fax: 011/39/079/212345. E-mail: micropat{at}ssmain.uniss.it.
Editor: W. A. Petri Jr.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Addis, M. F.,
P. Rappelli,
G. Delogu,
F. Carta,
P. Cappuccinelli, and P. L. Fiori.
1998.
Cloning and molecular characterization of a cDNA clone coding for Trichomonas vaginalis alpha-actinin and intracellular localization of the protein.
Infect. Immun.
66:4924-4931 |
| 2. | Addis, M. F., P. Rappelli, P. Cappuccinelli, and P. L. Fiori. 1997. Extracellular release by Trichomonas vaginalis of a NADP+ dependent malic enzyme involved in pathogenicity. Microb. Pathog. 23:55-61[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Alderete, J. F.,
P. Demés,
A. Gombo ova,
M. Valent,
M. Fabu ova,
A. Jano ka,
J. tefanovi , and R. Arroyo.
1988.
Specific parasitism of purified vaginal epithelial cells by Trichomonas vaginalis.
Infect. Immun.
56:2558-2562 |
| 4. |
Alderete, J. F., and G. E. Garza.
1985.
Specific nature of Trichomonas vaginalis parasitism of host cell surfaces.
Infect. Immun.
50:701-708 |
| 5. | Alderete, J. F., and G. E. Garza. 1985. Identification and properties of Trichomonas vaginalis proteins involved in cytadherence. Infect. Immun. 56:28-33. |
| 6. | Alderete, J. F., J. L. O'Brien, R. Arroyo, J. A. Engbring, O. Musatovova, O. Lopez, C. Lauriano, and J. Nguyen. 1995. Cloning and molecular characterization of two genes encoding adhesion proteins involved in Trichomonas vaginalis cytoadherence. Mol. Microbiol. 17:69-83[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Arroyo, R., J. Engbring, and J. F. Alderete. 1992. Molecular basis of host epithelial cell recognition by Trichomonas vaginalis. Mol. Microbiol. 6:853-862[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Arroyo, R., A. Gonzàlez-Robles, A. Martìnez-Palomo, and J. F. Alderete. 1993. Signalling of Trichomonas vaginalis for amoeboid transformation and adhesin synthesis follows cytoadherence. Mol. Microbiol. 7:299-309[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Bonilha, V. L., M. do C. Ciavaglia, W. De Souza, and F. Costa e Silva Filho. 1995. The involvement of terminal carbohydrates of the mammalian cell surface in the cytoadhesion of trichomonads. Parasitol. Res. 81:121-126[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Brugerolle, G., G. Bricheux, and G. Coffe. 2000. Immunolocalization of two hydrogenosomal enzymes of Trichomonas vaginalis. Parasitol. Res. 86:30-35[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. | Cappuccinelli, P., I. Cagliani, and G. Cavallo. 1975. Involvement of a surface concanavalin-A binding glycoprotein in the adhesion of Trichomonas vaginalis to substrates. Experientia 15:1157-1159. |
| 12. |
Casta e Silva Filho, F.,
W. de Souza, and J. D. Lopes.
1988.
Presence of laminin-binding proteins in trichomonads and their role in adhesion.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:8042-8046 |
| 13. | Diamond, L. S. 1957. The establishment of various trichomonads of animals and man in axenic cultures. J. Parasitol. 43:488-490[Medline]. |
| 14. | Engbring, J. A., and J. F. Alderete. 1998. Three genes encode distinct AP33 proteins involved in Trichomonas vaginalis cytoadherence. Mol. Microbiol. 28:305-313[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Engbring, J. A., J. L. O'Brien, and J. F. Alderete. 1996. Trichomonas vaginalis adhesin proteins display molecular mimicry to metabolic enzymes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 408:207-223[Medline]. |
| 16. | Fiori, P. L., P. Rappelli, and M. F. Addis. 1999. The flagellated parasite Trichomonas vaginalis: new insights into cytopathogenicity mechanisms. Microbes Infect. 1:149-156[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Fiori, P. L., P. Rappelli, A. M. Rocchigiani, and P. Cappuccinelli. 1993. Trichomonas vaginalis haemolysis: evidence of functional pore formation on red cell membranes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 109:13-18[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Gold, D., and I. Ofek. 1992. Adhesion of Trichomonas vaginalis to plastic surfaces: requirement for energy and serum constituents. Parasitology 105:55-62. |
| 19. | Honigberg, B. M. 1978. Trichomonads of importance in human medicine, p. 275. In J. P. Kreier (ed.), Parasitic protozoa, vol. II. Academic Press Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 20. | Hrdy, I., and M. Muller. 1995. Primary structure of the hydrogenosomal malic enzyme of Trichomonas vaginalis and its relationship to homologous enzymes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 42:593-603[Medline]. |
| 21. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Lahti, C. J., P. J. Bradley, and P. J. Johnson. 1994. Molecular characterization of the alpha-subunit of Trichomonas vaginalis hydrogenosomal succinyl CoA synthetase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 66:309-318[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Lehker, M. W., and D. Sweeney. 1999. Trichomonad invasion of the mucous layer requires adhesins, mucinases, and motility. Sex. Transm. Infect. 75:231-238[Abstract]. |
| 24. | Miraghani, A., and A. Warton. 1998. Involvement of Trichomonas vaginalis surface-associated glycoconjugates in the parasite/target cell interaction. A quantitative electron microscopy study. Parasitol. Res. 84:374-381[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Rappelli, P., A. M. Rocchigiani, G. Erre, M. M. Colombo, P. Cappuccinelli, and P. L. Fiori. 1995. Sequence of cDNA coding for a 65 kD adhesive protein for the specific detection of Trichomonas vaginalis by PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 129:21-26[Medline]. |
| 26. | Silva Filho, F. C., and V. L. Bonilha. 1992. Effect of estrogens on the adhesion of Trichomonas vaginalis to epithelial cells in vitro. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 25:9-18[Medline]. |
| 27. | Silva Filho, F. C., J. Ortega-Lopez, and R. Arroyo. 1998. YIGSR is the preferential laminin-1 residing adhesion sequence for Trichomonas vaginalis. Exp. Parasitol. 88:240-242[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. | Waites, K. B., and D. Taylor-Robinson. 1999. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma, p. 782-794. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|