Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2000, p. 5205-5209, Vol. 68, No. 9
Departments of
Medicine1 and
Pathology,2 Channing Laboratory, Brigham
and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts
Received 22 February 2000/Returned for modification 21 March
2000/Accepted 26 June 2000
The effect of O2 and CO2 on expression of
toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) by Staphylococcus
aureus was investigated under controlled growth conditions with
continuous-culture techniques. To stimulate TSST-1 production, air and
anaerobic gas were premixed before delivery to the culture vessel. At a
growth rate Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome
(TSS) is a relatively rare condition (0.06 cases per 100,000 people
[2]) caused by one or more potent exotoxins produced
by some strains of Staphylococcus aureus (4, 14,
32; P. M. Schlievert, Letter, Lancet
i:1149-1150, 1986). TSS is associated with a constellation
of symptoms, including fever, rash, diarrhea, and the inability to
maintain proper hemostasis. Severe cases often progress to
multiple-organ involvement and desquamation of the skin over the entire
body; some cases end in death (31). Of the 40% of TSS cases
associated with menstruation (2), almost all are caused by
TSS toxin 1 (TSST-1) (4, 14, 32; Schlievert, Letter,
Lancet i:1149-1150, 1986).
The association between menstrual TSS and tampon use has provoked
considerable discussion regarding the possible role of tampons in
menstrual TSS. Epidemiologic studies identified tampon brand and style
as the most important risk factors for development of menstrual TSS
(8, 21, 26, 28). Although some high-absorbency tampons
appeared to increase the relative risk of TSS, epidemiologic studies
did not resolve the issue of which specific tampon characteristic was
associated with this increased risk. The possibilities cited included
increased absorbency, increased total surface area, chemical composition, and increased oxygen delivery via the tampon itself. In
addition, alteration of the vaginal microflora during tampon use has
received considerable attention. Previous in vivo studies from this
laboratory indicated that tampons, regardless of fiber composition,
neither alter the normal vaginal microflora during use nor provide a
nidus for preferential growth of TSST-1-producing strains of S. aureus or other members of the vaginal microflora (18, 19,
20).
The concentrations of O2 and CO2, two
components important to microbial growth, have been measured in the
vagina before and after tampon insertion. In the undisturbed vaginal
environment, O2 and CO2 levels (partial
pressure) ranged from 0 to 3 mm Hg (0 to 0.5%) and from 50 to 60 mm Hg
(6.5 to 7.8%), respectively (33). Immediately after tampon
insertion, O2 and CO2 levels were 130 to 140 mm
Hg (20.8 to 22.4%) and 10 to 15 mm Hg (1.3 to 2.0%), respectively.
Later after insertion, the CO2 and O2 partial
pressures approached preinsertion values at different rates:
CO2 levels increased to preinsertion values within 20 to 90 min, while O2 concentrations did not fall to preinsertion
levels within the 8-h observation period, remaining at >20 mm Hg or
3.2%. These observations suggest that substantial amounts of available O2 are present within the vagina for an extended period
after tampon insertion. However, since the apparatus used for these measurements also resulted in the maintenance of a greater-than-normal total volume within the vagina, it was difficult to attribute the
experimental observations to tampon insertion with any certainty, and
the period of elevated O2 concentrations in the vaginas of test subjects may have been prolonged.
In vitro studies indicate that a number of environmental factors affect
production of TSST-1, including magnesium concentration, oxygen
concentration, growth rate, temperature, and pH (9, 13, 15, 16,
27, 29, 30, 34). However, it is still unclear whether any single
factor affects TSST-1 production under controlled growth conditions
that allow single variables to be altered. Most previous studies have
used batch culture systems in which the growth rate, nutrient levels,
and metabolite concentrations change during incubation. In such
systems, alteration of one factor results in concomitant changes in
other factors associated with growth. But some studies have used the
continuous-culture system, which allows the researcher to separate and
define parameters that are interdependent during batch culture growth,
such as growth rate, nutrient and product concentrations, and cell
density. During continuous culturing, fresh medium is added to a
culture at a fixed rate, and cells and medium are removed at a rate
that maintains a constant culture volume. If, in addition, other growth
environment parameters are held constant, the culture will reach a
steady state at which there is no net change in production rates of
metabolites or biomass. Once steady-state growth has been achieved, the
growth rate of the organism becomes independent of the concentration of
nutrients. Continuous culture can be viewed as a technique for
prolonging the exponential growth phase of a batch culture and for
producing a population of cells growing indefinitely in an unchanging
environment. Taylor and Holland used this type of system to evaluate
the effects of various environmental factors on TSST-1 production;
however, because they did not maintain a constant growth rate, it is
unclear whether the effects noted for their experiments were due to
changes in the environmental factors tested or were due to changes in
the growth rate (29, 30). The purpose of the present study
was to determine the effects of O2 and CO2 on
production of TSST-1 in a controlled growth environment that included a
constant growth rate.
Bacterial strain, strain maintenance, and culture medium.
S. aureus MN8 (provided by Patrick Schlievert, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis) is a TSST-1-producing strain isolated from a
patient with menstrual TSS. S. aureus RN8846 is an
agr mutant strain generated from a TSST-1-producing parent,
strain RN8465 (agr+), also isolated from a patient with
menstrual TSS (provided by Richard Novick, New York University, New
York, N.Y.). Strains were kept frozen at Continuous-culture growth system.
A 1.5-liter fermentor with
a 1-liter working volume (BioFlo; New Brunswick Scientific, Edison,
N.J.) was used for all experiments. Culture conditions were maintained
at 37°C, and a pH of 7.1 ± 0.1 was maintained by addition of
sterile 1 N NaOH with the use of a pH meter-controller (Cole Parmer
Instrument Company, Vernon, Ill.). A constant mixing rate of 600 rpm
was used. Gas was vigorously bubbled through the culture medium and the
vessel head space. The oxidation-reduction potential of the medium in
the growth vessel was continuously monitored with an Eh probe (Ingold,
Wilmington, Mass.) and a pH-Eh meter (Radiometer, Westlake, Ohio). The
growth rate, or mass doubling time (td), was
adjusted by altering the medium inflow rate via a peristaltic pump.
Inflow rates necessary to obtain tds of 3 and
9 h were determined by the formulas td = (ln 2)/µ and µ = D = F/V for
steady-state cultures, where µ is the specific growth rate
(h
0019-9567/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Production of Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 by
Staphylococcus aureus Requires Both Oxygen and Carbon
Dioxide
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
or mass doubling time (td)
of
3 h, production of specific TSST-1 (expressed as micrograms per
milligram of cell dry weight) was 5.9-fold greater at an O2
concentration of 4% than under anaerobic conditions. Increasing the
O2 concentration to 11% did not result in a significant increase (P > 0.05) in the rate of toxin production
over that during growth in 4% O2 but did result in a
significant increase (4.9-fold; P < 0.001) in the
rate of toxin production over that during anaerobic growth. At a
td of 9 h, addition of 3.5%
O2 resulted in a 7.6-fold increase in specific TSST-1
production. When room air was sparged through a culture growing at a
td of 9 h, TSST-1 production increased
significantly (by 3.4-fold) over that during anaerobic growth. When a
growth environment of 4% O2-remainder N2 was
studied, no increase in TSST-1 production was observed; this was also
the case with 8% O2 at gas-flow rates of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 liters/min. In all experiments, production of biomass (expressed as
milligrams of cell dry weight per milliliter) increased, indicating
that O2 was metabolized by S. aureus. Addition
of CO2 to the gas mix (4% O2, 10%
CO2, 86% N2) resulted in a 5.1- to 6.8-fold
increase in TSST-1 production over that during anaerobic growth and a
3.6-fold increase over that during growth in an environment of 4%
O2-remainder N2. The agr mutant
strain tested produced 6.1-fold more specific TSST-1 in a growth
environment of 4% O2-10% CO2-86% N2 than during anaerobic growth. These data suggest that in
this system, O2 alone does not trigger production of
TSST-1; rather, both CO2 and O2 are required.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
80°C as multiple 1-ml
aliquots from a 24-h batch culture with brain heart infusion broth
(Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) and cysteine (0.05%, wt/vol) as
the growth medium. In experimental studies, brain heart infusion broth
served as the nutrient medium.
1), D is the dilution rate
(h
1), F is the medium inflow rate (liters/h),
and V is the culture volume (liters). For
tds of 3 and 9 h, D was 0.23 and
0.08 h
1 and F was 0.23 and 0.08 liters/h, respectively.
and thus the
degree of O2 saturation
were the same. A dissolved
O2 probe and meter (Cole Parmer) were used to determine the
dissolved O2 concentration produced by the gas mix being
delivered to the second fermentor vessel. Samples (7 ml) were removed
directly from the growth vessel of the second fermentor with a sidearm sampling port and were processed for confirmation of culture purity and
measurement of CDW and TSST-1 concentrations.
Biomass measurements. Biomass measurements were calculated from CDW determinations. A 5-ml sample collected from the growth vessel was fixed with a final formaldehyde concentration of 4% (vol/vol), mixed, and allowed to sit overnight at room temperature. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation (1,625 × g; 10 min) and washed twice with sterile filtered water (0.22-µm-pore-size membrane). After the final centrifugation, the supernatant was decanted and the pelleted cells were resuspended in the residual liquid. The entire cell suspension was then transferred to a preweighed 0.22-µm-pore-size polycarbonate filter (Poretics, Livermore, Calif.). The tube was washed four times with sterile filtered water (500 µl each time). Each wash was transferred to the same 0.22-µm-pore-size polycarbonate filter. The filter was folded in half (to help retain the biomass during drying) and dried at 60°C for 24 to 48 h. Filters were reweighed with an analytic balance (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.) by the method of O'Toole, which compensates for moisture absorbed during weighing (22). Cell biomass values are reported as the difference between the weights of the dried filter before and after the addition of the sample and are expressed as CDW (milligrams of biomass per milliliter of culture).
TSST-1 determinations. TSST-1 concentrations (milligrams per milliliter of culture) were determined in the laboratory of Jeffrey Parsonnet (Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth, Mass.), except for experiments using strain RN8846, for which they were determined at the Channing Laboratory. In both cases, a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (1) was used, and concentrations were normalized using the corresponding CDW. Values were expressed as specific TSST-1 (micrograms per milligram of CDW).
Statistics. The amounts of CDW and specific TSST-1 produced under different environmental conditions were compared by one-way analysis of variance in the Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparison test with the use of Instat software (version 2.0 for Macintosh; Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, Calif.).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atmospheric O2.
When O2 was delivered
as a mixture of air and anaerobic gas mix to a culture growing at a
td of 3 h, specific TSST-1 increased by
5.9-fold
i.e., from 2.6 ± 0.1 µg of TSST-1/mg of CDW in
anaerobic conditions to 15.3 ± 2.5 µg/mg at an approximate
atmospheric O2 concentration of 4% (P < 0.001) (Table 1, experiment 1a). Biomass production increased 1.4-fold, which was determined not to be a
significant increase (P > 0.05). At 11% atmospheric
O2, there was a significant 4.9-fold increase in the amount
of specific TSST-1 per unit of biomass and a 2-fold increase in biomass
over that produced under anaerobic conditions (P < 0.001) (Table 1, experiment 1b). Increasing the atmospheric
O2 concentration from 4 to 11% did not result in
significantly more specific TSST-1 or biomass (P > 0.05). At a slower growth rate (td of 9 h),
specific TSST-1 increased by 7.6-fold and biomass by 2.0-fold from
anaerobic conditions to an approximate atmospheric O2
concentration of 3.5% (Table 1, experiment 2). Delivery of 100% room
air resulted in a significant, 3.4-fold increase in specific TSST-1
production (P < 0.05) and a 4.8-fold increase in
biomass (P < 0.001) from anaerobic conditions to 21%
atmospheric O2 (Table 1, experiment 3).
|
Analyzed gas mix of O2-N2. At a 9-h td and an O2 concentration of 4% (remainder N2), there was no significant change in specific TSST-1 levels (1.9-fold decrease; P > 0.05), while biomass increased 2.4-fold (P < 0.001) (Table 1, experiment 4). Likewise, there was no significant change in specific TSST-1 production when an 8% O2-92% N2 gas mix and increasing gas flow rates were used (Table 1, experiments 5, 6a, and 6b). Biomass production did increase 1.6-, 3.3-, and 4.6-fold for gas flow rates of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 liters/min (LPM), respectively (P < 0.001, except for experiment 5, for which the significance could not be calculated). There was a significant linear relationship between increasing biomass and increasing flow rate of the 8% O2-92% N2 gas mix (P < 0.0001). After the linear trend was accounted for, the difference among these values was still significant (P < 0.01).
Analyzed gas mix of
O2-CO2-N2.
In a gaseous
environment of 4% O2-10% CO2-86%
N2, the amounts of specific TSST-1 expression and biomass
production were determined (Fig. 1). In
all three experiments, there was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in biomass (by 2.0- to 2.6-fold) as well as
in specific TSST-1 expression (by 5.1- to 6.8-fold) following exposure
to the O2-CO2-N2 analyzed gas mix.
However, maximum biomass levels were not reached for 15 generations
after the switch from anaerobic gas to the
O2-CO2-N2 mix. For specific TSST-1
expression, the lag before significant levels of expression were
reached varied with the experiment; for the experiments depicted in
Fig. 1A, B, and C, it was 9.4, 23.6, and 10.6 generations,
respectively. The amount of biomass produced was the same for all three
experiments (0.71 to 0.77 mg/ml), while the mean level of specific
TSST-1 expression was not (3.5 ± 1.4, 10.2 ± 1.1, and
5.6 ± 0.7 µg/mg for Fig. 1A, B, and C, respectively). When an
agr mutant strain was tested, there was a significant
increase in both biomass (2.6-fold; P < 0.001) and
specific TSST-1 expression (6.1-fold; P < 0.01) by 6.8 generations following exposure to the
O2-CO2-N2 analyzed gas mix (Table
1, experiment 8). In a similar experiment using the parent
agr+ strain (RN8465), there was an increase in both biomass
(2.6-fold; P < 0.001) and specific TSST-1 expression
(1.6-fold; P > 0.05).
|
Switch from O2-N2 analyzed gas mix to
O2-CO2-N2 analyzed gas mix.
When the growth conditions were switched from O2 to
O2 and CO2, specific TSST-1 increased by
3.6-fold
i.e., from 4.8 ± 0.02 µg/mg of CDW in a 4%
O2-96% N2 gaseous environment to 15.3 ± 2.5 µg/mg in 4% O2-10% CO2-86%
N2 (P < 0.001). Biomass production did not
significantly change. In a 4% O2-96% N2
gaseous environment, a CDW of 0.76 ± 0.02 mg/ml was produced; the
switch to a gaseous environment of 4% O2-10%
CO2-86% N2 produced a CDW of 0.71 ± 0.02 mg/ml.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are a number of ways air can be introduced into the vaginal environment, including through the tampon insertion process and as trapped air within the tampon. Our original aim was to determine how inclusion of O2 introduced by tampon insertion affects S. aureus TSST-1 production by investigating whether O2 as part of the gaseous environment of a continuous culture growth system resulted in increased specific TSST-1 production.
Isolation and study of the effect of a single environmental variable, such as the concentration of dissolved O2, on batch culture growth is difficult unless other variables are adequately controlled. An alternative to traditional batch culture methods is the use of the continuous-culture method, in which organisms are cultivated in a stable growth environment at a set growth rate. The growth rate can be changed without changing the amount of biomass in the system. The amounts of cell biomass produced during anaerobic growth were not statistically different (P > 0.05) between experiments at two growth rates (Table 1 and Fig. 1). These results demonstrate the separation between the growth rate and the biomass yield that can be achieved if continuous-culture methods are used. This type of system permits the study of factors that affect interactions of microfloral components or, as in the case of S. aureus TSST-1, production of virulence factors.
S. aureus MN8, growing at a td of 3 h, did not produce significantly more specific TSST-1 when the level of O2 (from air) was increased from 4 to 11%. When room air flowed through the system at 0.2 LPM, there was a significant increase in biomass compared to growth under anaerobic conditions and to oxygenated growth in experiments 1a, 1b, and 2, while TSST-1 production decreased in comparison to production at lower levels of O2 (Table 1, experiment 3). When the growth rate was decreased (td, 9 h), the fold increase in specific TSST-1 was similar to that noted during growth at a td of 3 h (Table 1, experiments 1a, 1b, and 2). These findings suggest that increased O2 does not result in increased TSST-1 production and that the growth rate alone is not a factor in TSST-1 production.
In an attempt to more accurately study the effect of oxygen on TSST-1 production, an analyzed gas mix containing only O2 and N2 was used. Oxygen alone did not stimulate specific TSST-1 production but did stimulate a significant increase in biomass (2.39-fold at 4% O2; Table 1, experiment 4). In light of the biomass increase (a result indicating O2 metabolism), the lack of an increase in specific TSST-1 production cannot be attributed to insufficient O2 transfer. In addition, increasing volumetric gas flow rates of 8% O2 gas mix were associated with a significant trend of increasing biomass (Table 1, experiments 5, 6a, and 6b). These data indicate that oxygen alone, while capable of promoting increased biomass, does not trigger increased production of TSST-1 in this system. Hypothesizing that CO2 may be necessary for TSST-1 production in our system, we repeated the previous experiments, adding CO2 to the analyzed gas mix. Significant increases in specific TSST-1 indicated the importance of CO2 in TSST-1 production (Fig. 1).
In our studies, we normalized TSST-1 concentrations using CDW. Biomass was used as the denominator for all experiments to eliminate (i) the inherent variability of determinations of optical density due to the changes in the sizes of individual cells under different growth conditions, (ii) the poor sensitivity of optical methods for detecting small changes in the total number of cells, and (iii) the use of the viable cell count method, which does not differentiate between colonies formed by single and multiple bacterial cells. Only biomass adequately defines the cell mass producing TSST-1 under different growth conditions.
The observation that both CO2 and O2 are required for increased TSST-1 production is interesting. Since increasing the concentration of O2 alone causes increases in biomass, the role of CO2 in toxin production remains enigmatic. CO2 may serve as a carbon donor in some basic process associated with toxin expression or may act as a regulatory stimulus for toxin expression. It is important to note the lag in stimulation of specific TSST-1 production when an analyzed gas mixture of 4% O2-10% CO2-86% N2 was used (Fig. 1). This lag in toxin production was not observed in other studies in which specific TSST-1 values increased or with strains RN8846 and RN8465. Within five generations after the addition of air to an anaerobic culture or CO2 to a culture in an O2-N2 gaseous environment, the culture had already reached a new steady state and TSST-1 concentrations were maximal. Additional studies are under way to determine the cause of the lag in TSST-1 expression in this system.
The effect of CO2 on TSST-1 production contrasts with that of O2 and CO2 on expression of other S. aureus virulence factors. In addition to exotoxins, such as TSST-1, S. aureus produces surface structures, such as teichoic acid and protein A, as well as several capsular polysaccharides (CPs), including CP5 (1). It has been shown that O2 enhances CP5 production during exponential growth in batch culture (7, 11, 24) and that enhanced CP5 production is not due to respiratory activity alone (5). In batch culture studies in which increasing concentrations of CO2 were mixed with air, CO2 levels as low as 1% inhibited expression of CP5 relative to expression in the presence of air alone, which has a CO2 concentration of 0.1% (10). The authors noted that preliminary results from studies investigating the effects of CO2 on CP8 expression were similar. In contrast, increased CO2 levels (5%) did not affect the expression of protein A or teichoic acid. The effect of CO2 alone on CP5 production was confirmed in studies using an O2-N2 gas mix. A 5% CO2-20% O2-75% N2 gas mix inhibited CP5 expression relative to that measured for a gas mix without CO2 (20% O2, 80% N2). In our studies, the positive effect of CO2 on TSST-1 production was confirmed in a similar investigation. These experiments clearly demonstrate the importance of both O2 and CO2 in some S. aureus metabolic functions.
The human microflora encounters a variety of growth environments
characterized by changing temperatures, nutrient concentrations, and
gaseous atmospheres. These organisms have developed a number of
regulatory responses by which to adapt to these changes. The mechanisms
involved in the regulation of TSST-1 expression remain unclear. At
least two global regulatory systems control expression of surface
protein and exoprotein in S. aureus (including the expression of TSST-1): the regulatory loci agr and
sar (3, 17, 23, 25). Our data demonstrate that a
combination of O2 and CO2
but not
O2 alone
results in increased TSST-1 expression. The
agr system regulates expression of some genes in S. aureus in response to the presence of O2; an example
is the positive regulation of CP5 expression (6).
Preliminary results indicate that the agr system is not
affected by changing CO2 concentrations (10).
The agr system also includes a cell-density-dependent regulatory mode that involves an octapeptide pheromone (12). Our studies show that the agr system is unlikely to be
regulating TSST-1 production in this system, at least through a
quorum-sensing signal. Specific TSST-1 production increased
significantly while biomass remained unchanged when the gaseous
environment of the culture was switched from 4% O2 to 4%
O2-10% CO2. In addition, when the biomass
increased in response to the addition of O2, specific
TSST-1 production did not (Table 1, experiments 4 to 6b). Stimulation
of specific TSST-1 production is not cell density dependent. Results
from studies using an agr mutant, strain RN8846, (Table 1,
experiment 8) also support the conclusion that the agr
system is not regulating expression of TSST-1. Whether one of these
systems or an as yet undescribed system regulates expression of TSST-1
is unclear. The nature of the relationship of TSST-1 production to
CO2 and O2 will be the focus of additional research.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was funded by grants from Tambrands, Procter and Gamble.
We thank Paul Modern for technical assistance in performing TSST-1 determinations.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Channing Laboratory, 181 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 525-0726. Fax: (617) 731-1541. E-mail: rross{at}channing.harvard.edu.
Editor: J. T. Barbieri
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Arvidson, S. 1983. Extracellular enzymes from Staphylococcus aureus, p. 745-808. In C. Easmon, and C. Adlam (ed.), Staphylococci and staphylococcal infections. Academic Press, London, England. |
| 2. | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1996. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States, 1996. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 45:1-87[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Cheung, A. L.,
J. M. Koomey,
C. A. Butler,
S. J. Projan, and V. A. Fischetti.
1992.
Regulation of exoprotein expression in Staphylococcus aureus by a locus (sar) distinct from agr.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:6462-6466 |
| 4. | Crass, B., and M. Bergdoll. 1986. Toxin involvement in toxic shock syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 153:918-926[Medline]. |
| 5. | Dassy, B., and J. M. Fournier. 1996. Respiratory activity is essential for post-exponential-phase production of type 5 capsular polysaccharide by Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 64:2408-2414[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Dassy, B., T. Hogan, T. J. Foster, and J. M. Fournier. 1993. Involvement of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in expression of type 5 capsular polysaccharide by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:1301-1306. |
| 7. |
Dassy, B.,
W. T. Stringfellow,
M. Lieb, and J. M. Fournier.
1991.
Production of type 5 capsular polysaccharide by Staphylococcus aureus grown in semi-synthetic medium.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137:1155-1162 |
| 8. | Davis, J. P., P. J. Chesney, P. J. Wand, and M. LaVenture. 1980. Toxic-shock syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N. Engl. J. Med. 303:1429-1435[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Fischetti, V. A., F. Chapman, R. Kakani, J. James, E. Grun, and J. B. Zabriskie. 1989. Role of air in growth and production of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 by Staphylococcus aureus in experimental cotton and rayon tampons. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:S176-S181. |
| 10. | Herbert, S., D. Worlitzsch, B. Dassy, A. Boutonnier, J. M. Fournier, G. Bellon, A. Dalhoff, and G. Doring. 1997. Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide type 5: CO2 inhibition in vitro and in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 176:431-438[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Hochkeppel, H. K.,
D. G. Braun,
W. Vischer,
A. Imm,
S. Sutter,
U. Staeubli,
R. Guggenheim,
E. L. Kaplan,
A. Boutonnier, and J. M. Fournier.
1987.
Serotyping and electron microscopy studies of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with monoclonal antibodies to capsular polysaccharide types 5 and 8.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
25:526-530 |
| 12. |
Ji, G. Y.,
R. C. Beavis, and R. P. Novick.
1995.
Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:12055-12059 |
| 13. | Kass, E. H., M. I. Kendrick, Y. C. Tsai, and J. Parsonnet. 1987. Interaction of magnesium ion, oxygen tension, and temperature in the production of toxic-shock-syndrome toxin-1 by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 155:812-815[Medline]. |
| 14. | Lee, V. T., A. H. Chang, and A. W. Chow. 1992. Detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin B among toxic shock syndrome (TSS)- and non-TSS-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 166:911-915[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Mills, J. T.,
A. W. Dodel, and E. H. Kass.
1986.
Regulation of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 and total exoprotein production by magnesium ion.
Infect. Immun.
53:663-670 |
| 16. | Mills, J. T., J. Parsonnet, Y.-C. Tsai, M. Kendrick, R. K. Hickman, and E. H. Kass. 1985. Control of production of toxic-shock-syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) by magnesium ion. J. Infect. Dis. 151:1158-1161[Medline]. |
| 17. | Morfeldt, E., L. Janzon, S. Arvidson, and S. Lofdahl. 1988. Cloning of a chromosomal locus (exp) which regulates the expression of several exoprotein genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:435-440[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Onderdonk, A. B., M. L. Delaney, G. R. Zamarchi, M. L. Hirsch, A. Munoz, and E. H. Kass. 1989. Normal vaginal microflora during use of various forms of catamenial protection. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:S61-S67. |
| 19. |
Onderdonk, A. B.,
G. R. Zamarchi,
M. L. Rodriguez,
M. L. Hirsch,
A. Munoz, and E. H. Kass.
1987.
Qualitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:2779-2784 |
| 20. |
Onderdonk, A. B.,
G. R. Zamarchi,
M. L. Rodriguez,
M. L. Hirsch,
A. Munoz, and E. H. Kass.
1987.
Quantitative assessment of vaginal microflora during use of tampons of various compositions.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53:2774-2778 |
| 21. | Osterholm, M. T., J. P. Davis, R. W. Gibson, J. S. Mandel, L. A. Wintermeyer, C. M. Helms, J. C. Forfang, J. Rondeau, and J. M. Vergeront. 1982. Tri-state toxic-shock syndrome study. I. Epidemiologic findings. J. Infect. Dis. 145:431-440[Medline]. |
| 22. |
O'Toole, D. K.
1983.
Weighing technique for determining bacterial dry mass based on rate of moisture uptake.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
46:506-508 |
| 23. |
Peng, H.-L.,
R. P. Novick,
B. Kreiswirth,
J. Kornblum, and P. Schlievert.
1988.
Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Bacteriol.
170:4365-4372 |
| 24. | Poutrel, D. M., F. B. Gilbert, and M. Lebrun. 1995. Effects of culture conditions on production of type 5 capsular polysaccharide by human and bovine Staphylococcus aureus strains. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2:166-171[Abstract]. |
| 25. | Recsei, P., B. Kreiswirth, M. O'Reilly, P. Schlievert, A. Gruss, and R. P. Novick. 1986. Regulation of exoprotein gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by agr. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:58-61[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Schlech, W. F.,
K. N. Shands,
A. L. Reingold,
B. B. Dan,
G. P. Schmid,
N. T. Hargrett,
A. Hightower,
L. A. Herwaldt,
M. A. Neill,
J. D. Band, and J. V. Bennett.
1982.
Risk factors for development of toxic shock syndrome: association with tampon brand.
JAMA
248:835-839 |
| 27. | Schlievert, P. M., and D. A. Blomster. 1983. Production of staphylococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C: influence of physical and chemical factors. J. Infect. Dis. 147:236-242[Medline]. |
| 28. | Shands, K. N., G. P. Schmid, B. B. Dan, D. Blum, R. J. Guidotti, N. T. Hargrett, R. L. Anderson, D. L. Hill, C. V. Broome, J. D. Band, and D. W. Fraser. 1980. Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: association with tampon use and Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features in 52 cases. N. Engl. J. Med. 303:1436-1442[Abstract]. |
| 29. |
Taylor, D., and K. T. Holland.
1988.
Effect of dilution rate and Mg2+ limitation on toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 production by Staphylococcus aureus grown in defined continuous culture.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
134:719-723 |
| 30. | Taylor, D., and K. T. Holland. 1988. Production of TSST-1 by Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and the effects of magnesium ion limitation. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:S151-S156. |
| 31. | Todd, J. K., F. A. Kapral, M. Fishaut, and T. R. Welch. 1978. Toxic shock syndrome associated with phage group 1 staphylococci. Lancet ii:1116-1118. |
| 32. | Vergeront, J. M., S. J. Stolz, B. A. Crass, D. B. Nelson, J. P. Davis, and M. S. Bergdoll. 1983. Prevalence of serum antibody to staphylococcal enterotoxin F among Wisconsin residents: implications for toxic-shock syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 148:692-698[Medline]. |
| 33. | Wagner, G., L. Bohr, P. Wagner, and L. N. Petersen. 1984. Tampon-induced changes in vaginal oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 148:147-150[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Wong, A. C. L., and M. S. Bergdoll.
1990.
Effect of environmental conditions on production of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 by Staphylococcus aureus.
Infect. Immun.
58:1026-1029 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»