Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, January 2001, p. 115-122, Vol. 69, No. 1
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.115-122.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Serotype AD Strains of Cryptococcus
neoformans Are Diploid or Aneuploid and Are Heterozygous at the
Mating-Type Locus
Klaus B.
Lengeler,1,2
Gary M.
Cox,3,4 and
Joseph
Heitman1,2,3,4,5,*
Departments of
Genetics,1
Medicine,3
Microbiology,4 and Pharmacology
and Cancer Biology5 and the Howard
Hughes Medical Institute,2 Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Received 5 June 2000/Returned for modification 30 July
2000/Accepted 25 September 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cryptococcus neoformans is a pathogenic
basidiomycete with a defined sexual cycle involving mating between
haploid yeast cells with a transient diploid state. C. neoformans occurs in four predominant serotypes (A, B, C, and D),
which represent different varieties or species. Rare clinical and
environmental isolates with an unusual AD serotype have been reported
and suggested to be diploid. We found by fluorescence-activated cell
sorter analysis that serotype AD strains are aneuploid or diploid. PCR
analysis with primers specific for serotype A or D alleles of the
CNA1, CLA4, and GPA1 genes revealed
that both alleles are often present in serotype AD strains. PCR
analysis with primers specific for genes in the MATa or
MAT
mating-type loci revealed that serotype AD strains are heterozygous for the mating-type locus. Interestingly, in several
serotype AD strains, the MAT
locus was derived from the serotype D parent and the MATa locus was inherited from a
serotype A parent that has been thought to be extinct. Basidiospores
from a self-fertile serotype AD strain bearing the putative serotype A
MATa locus showed a very low viability (~5%), and no
fertile serotype A MATa strain could be recovered. Serotype
AD strains were virulent in a murine model. Hybrid AD strains could
readily be isolated following a laboratory cross between a serotype A strain and a serotype D strain. In summary, serotype AD strains of
C. neoformans are unusual aneuploid or diploid strains that result from matings between serotype A and D strains. Self-fertile isolates fail to undergo normal meiosis because of genetic divergence. Our findings further suggest that serotype A MATa strains
may exist in nature.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The basidiomycete Cryptococcus
neoformans is an opportunistic human fungal pathogen that causes
cryptococcal meningitis predominantly in immunocompromised patients. A
well-defined sexual life cycle (20-22, 25) and the
establishment of various molecular biological tools make this organism
an excellent model system for studies of fungal pathogenicity
(8).
The life cycle of C. neoformans is characterized by a
dimorphic transition between a haploid yeast form and a dikaryotic
filamentous form (1). After a haploid cell senses a cell
of opposite mating type (MATa or
MAT
), the cells produce filament-like structures called
conjugation tubes that protrude toward the mating partner. After cell
fusion, a dikaryotic mycelium is generated, composed of filaments
characterized by unfused parental nuclei and fused clamp connections.
Under proper environmental conditions, the tips of these filaments
develop into swollen cells termed basidia. Within this new
structure, karyogamy occurs followed by meiosis to generate four
recombinant haploid nuclei. The haploid nuclei divide mitotically and
bud off from the basidium to generate four long chains of
basidiospores. These spores germinate and produce vegetative, yeast cells.
The diploid phase of C. neoformans is normally transient,
and therefore most environmental and clinical isolates are haploid. Nevertheless, rare diploid isolates have been reported based on assays
determining cellular DNA contents (33-35), the analysis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers (4, 37), or isozyme analysis (5). Furthermore, we and others isolated
diploid strains following defined genetic crosses (32, 38,
39). Interestingly, most of the environmental and clinical
isolates that are thought to be diploid belong to the unusual class of serotype AD strains (5, 34).
C. neoformans has been classified into three varieties based
in part on serological differences in capsular antigens. Serotype A and
D strains each belong to a separate variety (varieties
grubii and neoformans, respectively), whereas
serotype B and C strains are classified as a single variety (variety
gattii) (16, 23). A fifth, unusual serotype,
AD, has also been described but is much less common than the four
predominant serotypes. DNA sequence analysis has revealed that serotype
B and C strains are phylogenetically much more closely related to each
other than to A or D strains, which in turn are estimated to have
diverged from each other approximately 18 million years ago (13,
42). Karyotype analysis revealed that the average chromosome
number for C. neoformans is between 12 and 13 (28, 29,
41). The smallest chromosomes in variety gattii are
400 to 700 kb in size, whereas the smallest chromosomes of varieties
neoformans and grubii are approximately 770 kb.
Nucleotide sequence comparison of the URA5 gene revealed
~8% sequence divergence between variety gattii and
variety neoformans or grubii (7, 14)
and ~5% sequence divergence between varieties neoformans and grubii.
Here we have characterized strains of the unusual serotype AD class to
establish their origin. By fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS)
analysis we found that serotype AD strains are diploid or aneuploid
(>1n but
2n). Second, by PCR analysis we
showed that these strains are heterozygous for serotype A- and
D-specific alleles and the MATa and MAT
mating-type loci. Third, we found that three serotype AD strains were
self-fertile and produced filaments, basidia, and basidiospores that
germinated poorly (~5%) to produce progeny that were still diploid
or aneuploid. Our findings reveal that serotype AD strains are hybrids
produced by crosses between serotype A and D parental strains and
suggest that evolutionary divergence and sequence differences
prevent proper chromosome segregation during meiosis in AD hybrid strains.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains.
The C. neoformans strains used were
clinical isolates ZG287, ZG290, MMRL774, and KW5 from the Duke Medical
Center permanent strain collection, strains CBS132 and ATCC 48184 from
the American Type Culture Collection, and strains CDC228, CDC304,
CDC92-74, and CDC94-383 from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. The congenic serotype D laboratory strains JEC20
(MATa) and JEC21 (MAT
) and the serotype
A strain H99 (MAT
) were used as haploid control strains.
In addition, several auxotrophic serotype D strains were used in
genetic crosses (JEC34 [MATa ura5-1], JEC43
[MAT
ura5], JEC170 [MAT
lys2 ade2],
JEC171 [MATa lys2 ade2], and H99
[MAT
5-FOAr]). Strains CDC228-1 to
CDC228-22 were isolated by dissecting basidiospores from the
self-fertile strain CDC228.
Media.
Strains were grown and maintained on YPD or YNB
medium; mating assays and confrontation assays were conducted on V8 or
filamentation agar medium, respectively. For serotype analysis, several
strains were grown in liquid Eagle's cell culture medium (Dulbecco's
modification; Mediatech Cellgro) supplemented with 25 mM
NaHCO3.
Serotyping.
Serotype analysis was performed using the Crypto
Check serotyping kit from Iatron Laboratories (Tokyo, Japan). Strains
were grown at room temperature on YPD plates for 48 h. Longer
incubation times (up to 10 days) normally resulted in stronger
agglutination reactions. A small amount of the growth was removed from
the medium and resuspended in 50 µl of physiological saline (0.9%).
A 5-µl volume of the cell suspension was mixed on a glass slide with 10 µl of each factor serum. After 2 min of gentle agitation, cell agglutination was visible, indicating positive reactions. In some cases, growth of the strains in a capsule-inducing cell culture medium
(Eagle's) supplemented with 25 mM NaHCO3 increased the reactivity in serotype analysis. Strains were grown for 3 to 4 days at
30°C on a rotary incubator in 5 ml of liquid medium. The cells were
pelleted, washed several times with physiological saline, and
resuspended in 50 µl of saline, and antibody reactions were performed
as described above. The patterns of agglutination results were
interpreted as follows: serotype A strains reacted with antigenic factors 1 and 7, serotype D strains reacted with factors 1 and 8, and
serotype AD strains reacted with factors 1, 7, and 8.
Mating assays, confrontation assays, and basidiospore
dissection.
For mating reactions, strains were pregrown on YPD
solid medium for 2 days. The cells were then mixed on V8 agar medium
and incubated at 24°C for several days. Filament and basidiospore formation was assessed by light microscopy every other day. In C. neoformans, secretion of pheromone induces specific morphological changes in a mating partner of the opposite mating type.
MAT
cells exposed to a-pheromone respond by producing
thin filament-like structures called conjugation tubes. In contrast,
MATa cells exposed to
-pheromone produce fewer
conjugation tubes and form unusual enlarged, round, refractile cells.
The ability of C. neoformans strains to secrete
pheromones or to respond to pheromones was determined by confrontation
assays. In confrontation assays, two strains pregrown on YPD medium
were streaked onto filament agar medium in two parallel thin lines as
close as possible (1 to 2 mm) without touching. Pheromones secreted by
one strain diffuse through the agar and induce morphological changes in
the confronted strain. Conjugation tube formation and swelling of cells
was assessed by light microscopy after 24 and 48 h of incubation
at 30°C. To isolate basidiospores, the self-fertile strain CDC228 was
grown on V8 medium as described for the mating reactions. Areas showing filament and basidiospore formation were excised from the agar plate,
and the basidiospores were transferred to a fresh YPD plate by
carefully touching the surface with the agar fragment. Spore dissection
was then performed by micromanipulation.
Cell wall staining, nuclear staining, and FACS analysis.
Prior to staining, vegetative cells and filaments were washed with
water and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C for at least 4 h. Cell
wall staining of filaments was performed with Calcofluor White, a dye
that is known to stain chitin-rich structures like primary septa. Fixed
filaments were washed twice with deionized water and stained with a
1-mg/ml Calcofluor White (Difco) solution for 10 to 15 min. Stained
filaments were analyzed for the fusion of clamp cells to the postapical
cell, a structure typically associated with septa in filamentous
basidiomycetes. To stain nuclei, fixed and washed cells/filaments were
incubated with 0.5 mg of ethidium bromide per ml or 10 µg of
propidium iodide per ml, two DNA-staining dyes, for 3 to 4 h at
37°C in the dark. Both staining solutions contained 1 mg of RNaseA
per ml. Stained cells/filaments were analyzed by fluorescence
microscopy to establish whether they were uni- or binucleate. FACS
analysis was performed by the method of Tanaka et al.
(35). Briefly, strains were grown for 48 h on YPD
plates and a small number of the cells were removed, washed, and fixed
as described above. The cells were washed twice with NS buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.2], 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM ZnCl2, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 7 mM
-mercaptoethanol) and stained with propidium iodide (NS buffer
supplemented with 10 µg of propidium iodide per ml and 1 mg of RNase
A per ml) for 3 to 4 h at 37°C in the dark. At this point, the
cells could be stored at 4°C in the dark for several hours. The cells
were washed twice with 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and diluted to about
108 to 109 cells/ml. Before being subjected to
FACS analysis, the cells were sonicated with a homogenizer for 10 s. At least 10,000 cells of each strain were analyzed for their DNA
content determined by relative fluorescence of stained genomic DNA. The
DNA content of diploid cells should display values of 2n and
4n with respect to the 1n and 2n DNA
content of haploid strains. In contrast, aneuploid strains have DNA
contents between the expected values for haploid and diploid strains.
PCR analysis.
The presence or absence of several known genes
or alleles was tested by PCR analysis using gene- and allele-specific
primer combinations (sequences are given in Table
1). Before using these primers in our
analysis, we tested their specificity on 65 Cryptococcus strains of known serotype and/or mating type (45 serotype A
MAT
, 15 serotype D MAT
, and 5 serotype D
MATa strains). Very weak or no cross-reactivity
between serotypes or mating types was observed for most primer
combinations using 20 to 30 cycles of PCR and the optimal annealing
temperature estimated by the overall nucleotide composition of each
primer (A or T, 2°C each; G or C, 4°C each). In most cases, weak
cross-reactivity could be eliminated by decreasing the PCR cycle
numbers and/or increasing the annealing temperatures without the loss
of strong, specific signals for the tester strains JEC20, JEC21, H99,
and 125.91. Exceptions were the STE20
serotype D-specific
primer pair, which showed some cross-reactivity with the serotype A
MAT
strain H99, and the STE20a serotype
A-specific primer pair (see Results).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Primers and primer combinations used to identify
serotype- and/or mating-type specific genes in serotype AD strains
of C. neoformans
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Confirming serotype AD strain identities by serotyping.
We
obtained a collection of 10 strains that were previously reported to be
serotype AD. Based on serum reactivity, 7 of the 10 strains that we
investigated were in fact serotype AD (Table 2). Strain CDC92-74 typed as serotype D,
and strain ZG287 was untypeable even after growth in Eagle's cell
culture medium, which induces capsule production and usually
facilitates serotyping. The stock strain CBS132, which is deposited as
a holotype D strain at the American Type Culture Collection and the
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures but was typed as serotype AD by
others (18, 19), typed as serotype A in our analysis.
Changes in serotype from AD to A or D alone may result from instability
of diploid strains during prolonged propagation, as has been suggested
by Brandt et al. (5).
Serotype AD strains are diploid or aneuploid by FACS analysis.
Fluorescence microscopy of propidium iodide-stained vegetative cells
revealed that all 10 serotype AD isolates were uninucleate (data not
shown). FACS analysis revealed that strains ZG290, MMRL774, KW5,
CDC228, CBS132, and ATCC 48184 displayed DNA contents expected for
diploid strains (Fig. 1; Table 2). For
strains CBS132 and ATCC 48184, similar findings have been reported
previously by Tanaka et al. (34). In contrast, strains
ZG287, CDC92-74, CDC94-383, and CDC304 were aneuploid and had DNA
contents intermediate between the known haploid tester strains H99,
JEC20, and JEC21 and the expected and experimentally determined value
for known diploid strains (32).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Serotype AD strains are aneuploid or diploid by flow
cytometry. The haploid strains JEC20 (serotype D) and H99 (serotype A)
and 10 serotype AD strains were subjected to DNA content analysis by
FACS by the method of Tanaka et al. (35) (see Materials
and Methods). In comparison to the haploid tester strains JEC20 and
H99, six AD strains exhibited the DNA contents expected for diploid
strains (strain KW5 is shown as an example) whereas four strains had
DNA contents between 1n and 2n (shown for strain
CDC304). For a summary, see Table 2. The DNA content of cells was
measured by determining the relative fluorescence intensities.
|
|
PCR analysis reveals that serotype AD strains are diploid or
aneuploid.
We further examined the ploidy of serotype AD strains
using PCR to test for the presence or absence of serotype A- or
D-specific alleles of the CLA4, GPA1 (2,
36), and CNA1 (12, 27) genes. As
mentioned above, genes of serotype A and D vary in their nucleotide
sequence by up to 5%. Based on this sequence divergence, we designed
primers to specifically amplify the serotype A or D alleles of the
CLA4, GPA1, and CNA1 genes. In
general, one of the primers was nonspecific and hybridized to both the
serotype A and D alleles while the other primer was designed to
divergent regions of the two alleles to preferentially amplify only the serotype A or D allele. The CLA4 unique primers were
designed to an exon-intron region showing a divergence of several base pairs in the two CLA4 alleles, and the differences were
positioned toward the 3' end of the primers. The CNA1 and
GPA1 serotype A- and D-specific primers took advantage of
small (4- to 9-bp) deletions in the promoter or nontranslated leader
regions of these genes. As shown in Fig.
2 and summarized in Table 2, all of the
analyzed strains were heterozygous for at least one of the
CLA4, GPA1, or CNA1 loci. In
particular, strains CDC94-383, CDC228, and CDC304 contained the
serotype A and D alleles of all three genes. Several strains, including
ZG287 and CBS132, exhibited loss of heterozygosity for at least one of
the marker genes. Taken together, these findings based on PCR and FACS
analysis indicate that many of the serotype AD isolates are diploid for
many but not all loci in the genome.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Serotype AD strains of C. neoformans are
heterozygous for the CLA4, CNA1, and
GPA1 genes. Haploid serotype D strains JEC20 and
JEC21, the haploid serotype A strain H99, and serotype AD strains (from
left to right, ZG287, ZG290, MMRL774, KW5, ATCC48184, CBS132,
CDC94-383, CDC92-74, CDC228, and CDC304) were analyzed by PCR for
the presence or absence of serotype-specific alleles of the
CLA4, CNA1, and GPA1 genes. For a
summary, see Table 2.
|
|
In addition to analyzing the unusual serotype AD strains for
heterozygosity at the CLA4, CNA1, and
GPA1 genes, we analyzed their genome for heterozygosity at
the mating-type locus through the mating-type-specific genes
MF
2, STE11
, STE12
(9, 40, 43), and STE20a/
. The mating-type
locus was of particular interest because only MAT
isolates of serotype A strains have been reported. Therefore, models in
which serotype AD strains arose by crosses between serotype A and D
strains would predict that the MAT
locus was
inherited from a serotype A strain. Four of the serotype AD strains tested clearly showed heterozygosity for the mating-type locus
(Fig. 3). In these four strains
(ZG287, MMRL774, KW5, and CBS132), the serotype D
MATa locus and the serotype A MAT
locus
were present. One other strain, CDC94-383, carries the serotype D
MATa locus and either lacks the corresponding
chromosome containing the MAT
locus or has a deletion in
the mating-type locus (Fig. 3, STE12
; Table 2).
Surprisingly, the remaining five strains (ZG290, ATCC 48184, CDC228,
CDC304, and CDC92-74) inherited the MAT
locus from the
serotype D mating partner (Fig. 3). This finding implies that the
MATa locus of these strains was inherited from a
serotype A MATa parental strain, which has been
thought to be extinct.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Serotype AD strains of C. neoformans are
heterozygous at the mating-type locus. Haploid serotype D strains JEC20
and JEC21, the haploid serotype A strain H99, and serotype AD strains
(from left to right, ZG287, ZG290, MMRL774, KW5, ATCC48184, CBS132,
CDC94-383, CDC92-74, CDC228, and CDC304) were analyzed by PCR for the
presence or absence of mating-type- and/or serotype-specific alleles of
the MF 2, STE20, STE11 , and
STE12 genes. For a summary, see Table 2.
|
|
The serotype A MATa locus is present in some serotype
AD strains.
During the process of analyzing the
MATa mating-type locus of serotype D in C. neoformans, we recently isolated a novel STE20a allele
from a clinical serotype A isolate (K. B. Lengeler, P. Wang,
G. M. Cox, J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman, submitted for publication). With primers specific for this novel serotype A STE20a allele, we found that four strains (ZG290, ATCC
48184, CDC228, and CDC304) contain at least part of the serotype A
MATa locus, as was predicted based on the initial PCR
analysis (Fig. 4). Because these primers
showed weak cross-reactivity with some MAT
strains of
various serotypes, we cloned and sequenced the 867-bp PCR products.
This analysis revealed that the sequences were ~99% identical to the
original STE20a serotype A allele. These findings further
confirm that C. neoformans var. grubii MATa
strains exist in nature and have intercrossed with C. neoformans var. neoformans MAT
strains.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Several unusual serotype AD strains of C. neoformans have inherited the serotype A MATa
mating-type locus. PCR analysis was conducted with genomic DNA isolated
from strains JEC20 (MATa, serotype D), JEC21
(MAT , serotype D), 125.91 (MATa,
serotype A), H99 (MAT , serotype A), and five unusual
serotype AD strains using primers specific to the serotype D
STE20 and serotype A STE20a genes. PCRs were
run on separate agarose gels, and DNA was stained with ethidium
bromide.
|
|
Mating and filamentation properties of serotype AD strains.
The diploid strains were further assessed by testing their ability to
mate and filament. Of the 10 strains, 7 were completely sterile and
showed no mating reaction with MATa or
MAT
strains (H99, JEC20, and JEC21), even after several
weeks of incubation on V8 or filamentation agar mating medium (Table
2). In addition, no mating was observed with auxotrophic mating
partners, which typically exhibit enhanced mating. The seven sterile
serotype AD strains failed to respond to either MFa or MF
mating pheromone in confrontation assays and also failed to produce
pheromones and induce conjugation tubes or haploid fruiting in
MATa or MAT
confronting cells. This
finding suggests that pheromone expression may be repressed or
defective in serotype AD strains.
Three serotype AD strains (KW5, CDC228, and CDC304) were self-fertile
and produced filaments and basidia when incubated alone on either V8 or
filamentation agar medium (Fig. 5A). The
filaments produced consisted of uninucleate cells (Fig. 5B), as
previously observed with diploid strains produced by defined genetic
crosses (32). That serotype AD strains produce uninucleate
filament cells demonstrates that these strains are diploid and not
heterokaryons. In contrast to congenic diploid strains but similar to
mating reactions, filaments produced by the serotype AD strain CDC228 contained both unfused and a few fused clamp connections (Fig. 5C and
D). The three self-fertile serotype AD strains produced no more
filaments when confronted or coincubated with MATa or
MAT
cells and did not stimulate conjugation tube
formation in either MATa or MAT
cells.
Thus, the self-fertile isolates are sterile and may not produce
pheromones. Finally, the self-fertile strains produced filaments on YNB
plates at 24°C but not at 37°C, indicating that these strains are
thermally dimorphic, as we recently showed to be the case with congenic
diploid strains of C. neoformans (32).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Self-fertile serotype AD strains are uninucleate and
produce filaments with unfused and fused clamp connections. (A)
Self-fertile strains CDC228 and KW5 were self-fertile on V8 medium and
produced filaments and basidia after several days of incubation. (B)
Staining with ethidium bromide revealed that filament cells are
uninucleate. Clamp connections are indicated (arrowheads), determining
cell boundaries. (C and D) In addition, Calcofluor White staining
showed that clamp connections were mainly unfused (C), although a few
fused clamp connections were also present (D).
|
|
Serotype AD strains are virulent in a murine model.
Most
unusual serotype AD strains cited in the literature are clinical
isolates. Nevertheless, we wanted to examine whether serotype AD
isolates are virulent in a standard murine model. A total of 5 × 104 yeast cells of each of the self-fertile strains (KW5,
CDC228, and CDC304), the holotype strain CBS132, and the
well-characterized serotype A strain H99 were used to infect 10 female
A/Jcr mice by nasal inhalation. Survival was monitored for 150 days
postinoculation. We found that serotype AD strains were moderately
virulent in comparison to the serotype A strain H99 (Fig.
6). Infection with the serotype A strain
H99 resulted in 100% lethal infections by day 30 postinoculation. In
contrast, all four serotype AD strains were less virulent. Strain KW5
resulted in 100% lethal infection by day 100, whereas strains CDC304,
CDC228, and CBS132 caused 50% lethal infection by days 116, 132, and
145, respectively.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Serotype AD strains are virulent in a murine model. Ten
female A/Jcr mice each were infected with 5 × 104
cells of one of the serotype AD strains CBS132, KW5, CDC228, and CDC304
or the serotype A strain H99 by nasal inhalation and monitored for
survival postinoculation. The strains were pregrown in liquid YPD
medium overnight at 30°C and washed with phosphate-buffered saline
several times prior to infection.
|
|
Self-fertile strain CDC228 produces viable diploid spores.
Most genetic analysis with C. neoformans is performed with
serotype D strains because of the existence of a congenic pair of
MATa and MAT
strains (17,
24). On the other hand, serotype A strains are often more
virulent in patients and in animal model systems. One drawback to
studies with serotype A strains is the lack of a congenic
MATa strain. The identification of a
MATa serotype A strain would therefore be of great importance since it would allow the generation of congenic
MATa and MAT
serotype A strains.
Our PCR analysis indicated that four of the serotype AD strains studied
here inherited the MATa locus from a serotype A
strain. One such strain, CDC228, is self-fertile, 2n by FACS analysis, and heterozygous for every gene analyzed by PCR. We took
advantage of the self-fertile phenotype of the CDC228 strain in an
attempt to isolate a haploid or aneuploid serotype A
MATa strain. Of 428 dissected basidiospores, only 22 germinated to produce viable colonies for an overall survival rate of
approximately 5.5%, which is considerably lower than the germination
rate of basidiospores isolated from defined genetic crosses (>80%).
By PCR analysis, all 22 progeny strains were still heterozygous for the
CLA4 and GPA1 serotype A and D alleles (Table
3). Most of the segregants still
contained the serotype D MAT
locus like the parental
strain CDC228, although segregant CDC228-2 appeared to have a deletion
in the STE20 gene. One segregant, CDC228-4, lacked the
MAT
locus from serotype D and may contain the desired serotype A MATa locus. Ten segregants were
self-fertile on V8 plates, which fell into two different classes. Eight
segregants were self-fertile. The remaining two segregants were
self-fertile on V8 medium alone, but filament formation was inhibited
by coincubation with MATa or MAT
cells (JEC20 or
JEC21, respectively). Two strains mated with both tester strains
(bimaters) but did not produce filaments on their own. In addition,
three strains were sterile, including the presumptive serotype A
MATa strain CDC228-4. The remaining seven segregants
mated as MAT
cells (Table 3). Serotype analysis revealed
that the presumptive serotype A MATa strain CDC228-4
was untypeable whereas five of the seven MAT
strains
reacted strongly with serum factors 1 and 8 and are therefore serotype
D. Two MAT
strains, CDC228-9 and CDC228-16 showed very weak
reactivity with serum factor 7 and strong reactivity with factors 1 and
8, indicating that they are serotype AD. These findings suggest that
serotype may be linked to the MAT locus.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3.
Mating and ploidy analysis of 22 isolates derived from
basidiospores of the self-fertile serotype AD strain CDC228
|
|
In summary, the serotype AD strain CDC228 sporulated to produce few
viable spores, many of which were still diploid or aneuploid, self-fertile, and serotype AD, suggesting that meiosis does not occur
properly in this strain.
AD hybrids result from defined laboratory crosses.
As
mentioned above, serotype AD strains are thought to have arisen by
crosses between serotype A and D strains in nature. We addressed this
hypothesis by testing if AD hybrid strains can be generated by defined
crosses in the laboratory. The serotype D strain JEC171
(MATa ade2 lys2) was crossed with a
5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA)-resistant mutant of the serotype A strain
H99 (MAT
), and recombinant, prototrophic basidiospores
were selected on YNB medium. A total of 48 prototrophic
segregants were than analyzed for filamentation on YNB medium at
24°C, and 46 isolates exhibited temperature-dependent
dimorphism characteristic of diploid strains in C. neoformans (32). Yeast cells of 18 isolates,
including the two nonfilamenting strains, were stained with
propidium iodide to determine ploidy by FACS analysis. All 18 strains
were uninucleate by fluorescence microscopy and aneuploid or near
diploid by FACS analysis (Fig. 7B). The
first DNA peaks of the AD hybrid strains were between the 1n
and 2n DNA contents for the two haploid tester strains H99
(5-FOAr) and JEC171 (DNA area values, 200 and 400, respectively). Eight isolates were subjected to further analysis. By
PCR, these eight strains were heterozygous and contained both the
serotype A and D alleles of the common GPA1 gene and the
mating-type-specific genes STE20
(serotype A) and
STE20a (serotype D) (Fig. 7A). Surprisingly, by antibody
reactions, none of these strains were serotype AD: six strains were
serotype D, one strain was untypeable, and one strain even showed both
B and D reactivity. Overall, our data show that hybrid AD strains can
easily be generated in defined laboratory crosses. These AD hybrid
strains are self-fertile, thermally dimorphic, and diploid by FACS and
PCR analysis. In addition, the results obtained from serotyping the
hybrid AD strains suggest that serotype D is dominant in C. neoformans.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
AD diploid strains can be isolated following a defined
genetic cross. Serotype A strain H99 (5-FOAr) was crossed
to the serotype D strain JEC171 (MATa lys2 ade2)
on V8 agar medium. A total of 48 recombinant prototrophic progeny were
isolated by plating basidiospores on YNB agar medium. (A) The genomic
DNA of eight progeny was isolated (isolates 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 23, 28, and
40) and subjected to PCR analysis using primers to the serotype A- or
D-specific alleles of the gene GPA1 or the mating-type- and
serotype-specific alleles STE20a (serotype D) and
STE20 (serotype A). Control DNA was derived from strains
JEC20 (MATa, serotype D) and H99 (MAT ,
serotype A). (B) Yeast cells of 18 prototrophic isolates were stained
with propidium iodide as described (see Materials and Methods) and
analyzed by FACS. The results shown are for the haploid parental strain
JEC171 and three progeny (isolates 1, 2, and 11). All 18 progeny showed
two peaks in DNA content that correspond to 2n and
4n amounts of DNA compared to the 1n and
2n contents of the haploid parental strain JEC171.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although C. neoformans is predominantly a haploid
organism, diploid strains have been generated through defined
genetic crosses (32, 38, 39). In addition,
environmental and clinical isolates have been identified that show some
characteristics of diploids, and most of these strains are serotype AD
(4, 5, 33-35, 37). In this report we show that serotype
AD strains are probably aneuploids or near diploids. First, by FACS
analysis, 4 of 10 strains had total DNA contents in between those of
haploid and diploid strains; the remaining six strains had near-diploid
DNA contents. Second, by PCR analysis, serotype AD strains are
heterozygous for many but not all genetic markers analyzed. Five
strains that appeared diploid by FACS analysis carried only a serotype
A or serotype D allele of at least one marker gene, which may reflect
either chromosome loss or gene conversion. We conclude that some
serotype AD isolates are aneuploid, and, based on our data, aneuploidy or diploidy is a consistent explanation for the other isolates.
We and others have recently shown that stable diploid strains can be
isolated from defined genetic crosses. That environmental and clinical
serotype AD isolates are aneuploids rather than true diploids is
probably due to genome instabilities in C. neoformans. Franzot et al. (15) and Viviani et al. (37)
have recently shown that C. neoformans can undergo
phenotypic as well as genotypic changes during prolonged propagation
and improper storage. One phenotype that shows high variability in
serotype AD strains is serotype. This may be the reason why the stock
strain CBS132 serotyped differently in our studies from in other
studies. Genotypic changes in diploid cells may include structural
chromosomal aberrations and even loss of whole chromosomes.
In addition, meiotic events may contribute to genome instability in
C. neoformans. A high variability in karyotype was found among the progeny of a defined cross with respect to each other as well
as in comparison to the parental strains (4). This may
explain our finding that the progeny of the self-fertile diploid strain
CDC228 were highly variable in genotype and phenotype. Interestingly,
all of the progeny isolated were still heterozygous by PCR analysis. It
therefore might be that, in contrast to the diploid strains generated
by defined genetic crosses between congenic serotype D strains,
serotype AD diploids are unable to properly execute meiosis. In
addition to self-fertile or sterile isolates, several segregants mated
as MAT
cells and were serotype D. This implies that some
serotype D MAT
isolates found in nature might in fact be
aneuploids instead of true haploid strains. Interestingly, Tolkacheva
et al. found during the isolation of the G-protein
subunit
GPA1 from C. neoformans that strain ATCC 42163 contained two different alleles of this gene (36). Strains
ATCC 42163 (mating type
) and ATCC 42164 (mating type a) were both
isolated from a self-fertile isolate (ATCC 34868) reported to be
serotype A, but strains ATCC 42164 and ATCC 34868 both typed as
serotype D in our studies. The presence of both mating types in the
progeny of strain ATCC 34868 indicates that this strain probably is an aneuploid or diploid strain. This fact and the finding that two copies
of GPA1 were present in strain ATCC 42163 suggest that the
progeny of strain ATCC 34868 are still aneuploid or diploid. This
clearly demonstrates that careful strain characterization of
environmental and clinical isolates used in laboratory experiments is
an important issue in C. neoformans research.
One hypothesis consistent with all the data is that serotype AD strains
have arisen from crosses between haploid serotype A and D strains. The
results from our PCR analysis provide further support for this
hypothesis and show that AD strains contain both serotype A- and
D-specific alleles for most markers tested. In addition, we found that
hybrid AD strains could readily be generated following defined genetic
crosses of serotype A and D strains. Hybrid AD strains were
uninucleate, aneuploid, or diploid by FACS analysis and were
heterozygous at the GPA1 gene locus as well as at the
mating-type-specific STE20 gene locus. C. neoformans var. neoformans and grubii are
thought to have diverged 10 to 20 million years ago and are known to
have quite large differences in genome structure and sequence. Crosses
between members of these varieties generate few viable spores, similar
to the ratio of viable to inviable basidiospores we isolated from the
self-fertile strain CDC228. Reduced spore viability is probably due to
production of aneuploid spores as a result of improper alignment of
chromosomes during meiosis, leading to defects in chromosome
segregation or chromosome separation.
We have recently shown that congenic diploid strains are thermally
dimorphic and grow as yeasts at 37°C yet spontaneously filament and
sporulate at 24°C (32). Of 48 hybrid AD strains isolated
following a defined cross between serotype A and D strains, 46 exhibited this thermally dimorphic phenotype; however, only 3 of 10 serotype AD strains that were clinical or environmental isolates were
self-filamenting, and all 3 were thermally dimorphic. Because diploid
and heterokaryon strains grow very slowly in the filamentous state,
mutations or chromosome loss events that prevent filamentous growth may
confer a selective growth advantage in serotype AD strains, explaining
why most serotype AD strains are aneuploid and no longer self-fertile.
This may also contribute to genome instability and plasticity in this
lineage of C. neoformans.
Our findings suggest that serotype A MATa strains
still exist. Several serotype AD diploid strains contained the serotype D MAT
locus, implying that the MATa
locus was inherited from the serotype A parent. In fact, we could
directly demonstrate that four serotype AD strains contain the novel
STE20a serotype A allele recently identified in our
laboratory (Lengeler et al., submitted). This result further supports
the idea that serotype A MATa strains still exist in
nature. The finding that a putative serotype A MATa
progeny from the self-fertile AD diploid strain CDC228 (CDC228-4) was
sterile may explain why serotype A MATa strains have
not been identified thus far. Studies are under way in our laboratory
to identify fertile haploid serotype A MATa strains
for use in the construction of congenic MATa and
MAT
serotype A strains.
Most serotype AD strains are clinical isolates. We tested several
serotype AD strains in a murine virulence model and found that serotype
AD strains are moderately virulent in comparison to the
well-characterized serotype A strain H99. Further studies with defined
parental A and D haploid strains and with hybrid AD strains are
required to fully establish the effect of serotype AD and ploidy on virulence.
Finally, most epidemiological and molecular diagnostic studies with
C. neoformans require the analysis of complex data generated either by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (5, 6) or
randomly amplified polymorphic DNA techniques (3, 6, 11, 26, 30,
31). In addition, these techniques are in general not able to
distinguish between mating types, which have to be analyzed by
time-consuming crosses in which many strains are sterile. Molecular analysis of mating-type loci in C. neoformans provides a new
approach. Chaturvedi et al. recently reported that they were able to
analyze the mating type, ploidy, and variety of C. neoformans strains based on the sequence divergence of C. neoformans within the mating pheromones (10). Our
studies further demonstrate that the serotype, mating type, and ploidy
of C. neoformans strains can be readily established by rapid
PCR analysis. Further work on the mating-type loci in different
varieties of C. neoformans will provide additional sequence
information, which should enable the design of primers that are
specific for all mating types and varieties present in C. neoformans.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Jianping Xu for strains, Rey A. Sia for assistance in
the early stages of this project, and John Perfect for advice and
encouragement. We also thank Carol Newlon and John McCusker for
comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by NIAID RO1 grants AI39115 and AI42159
to Joseph Heitman and PO1 grant AI44975 to the Duke University Mycology
Research Unit. Gary M. Cox is a Burroughs Wellcome new investigator in
Molecular Pathogenic Mycology. Joseph Heitman is a Burroughs Wellcome
Scholar in Molecular Pathogenic Mycology and an associate investigator
of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Genetics, 322 CARL Bldg., Research Dr., Box 3546, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 684-2824. Fax: (919)
684-5458. E-mail: heitm001{at}duke.edu.
Editor:
W. A. Petri Jr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alspaugh, J. A.,
R. C. Davidson, and J. Heitman.
2000.
Morphogenesis of Cryptococcus neoformans, p. 217-238.
In
J. F. Ernst, and A. Schmidt (ed.), Dimorphism in human pathogenic and apathogenic yeasts, vol. 5. Contributions in Microbiology Basel, Switzerland.
|
| 2.
|
Alspaugh, J. A.,
J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman.
1997.
Cryptococcus neoformans mating and virulence are regulated by the G-protein subunit GPA1 and cAMP.
Genes Dev.
11:3206-3217[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Aoki, F. H.,
T. Imai,
R. Tanaka,
Y. Mikami,
H. Taguchi,
N. F. Nishimura,
K. Nishimura,
M. Miyaji,
A. Z. Schreiber, and M. L. Branchini.
1999.
New PCR primer pairs specific for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A or B prepared on the basis of random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprint pattern analyses.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:315-320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Boekhout, T., and A. V. Belkum.
1997.
Variability of karyotypes and RAPD types in genetically related strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Curr. Genet.
32:203-208[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Brandt, M. E.,
S. L. Bragg, and R. W. Pinner.
1993.
Multilocus enzyme typing of Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:2819-2823[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brandt, M. E.,
L. C. Hutwagner,
R. J. Kuykendall, and R. W. Pinner.
1995.
Comparison of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis for molecular subtyping of Cryptococcus neoformans. The Cryptococcal Disease Active Surveillance Group.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
33:1890-1895[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Casadevall, A.,
L. F. Freundlich,
L. Marsh, and M. D. Scharff.
1992.
Extensive allelic variation in Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:1080-1084[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Casadevall, A., and J. R. Perfect.
1998.
Cryptococcus neoformans.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 9.
|
Chang, Y. C.,
B. L. Wickes,
G. F. Miller,
L. A. Penoyer, and K. J. Kwon-Chung.
2000.
Cryptococcus neoformans STE12 regulates virulence but is not essential for mating.
J. Exp. Med.
191:871-882[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Chaturvedi, S.,
B. Rodeghier,
J. Fan,
C. M. McClelland,
B. L. Wickes, and V. Chaturvedi.
2000.
Direct PCR of Cryptococcus neoformans MAT and MATa pheromones to determine mating type, ploidy, and variety: a tool for epidemiological and molecular pathogenesis studies.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
38:2007-2009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Cogliati, M.,
M. Allaria,
A. M. Tortorano, and M. A. Viviani.
2000.
Genotyping Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans with specific primers designed from PCR-fingerprinting bands sequenced using a modified PCR-based strategy.
Med. Mycol.
38:97-103[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Cruz, M. C.,
R. A. L. Sia,
M. Olson,
G. M. Cox, and J. Heitman.
2000.
Comparison of the roles of calcineurin in physiology and virulence in serotype D and serotype A strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Infect. Immun.
68:982-985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Fan, M.,
B. P. Currie,
R. R. Gutell,
M. A. Ragan, and A. Casadevall.
1994.
The 16S-like, 5.8S and 23S-like rRNAs of the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans: sequence, secondary structure, phylogenetic analysis and restriction fragment polymorphisms.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
32:163-180[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Franzot, S. P.,
B. C. Fries,
W. Cleare, and A. Casadevall.
1998.
Genetic relationship between Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans strains of serotypes A and D.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:2200-2204[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Franzot, S. P.,
J. Mukherjee,
R. Cherniak,
L. C. Chen,
J. S. Hamdan, and A. Casadevall.
1998.
Microevolution of a standard strain of Cryptococcus neoformans resulting in differences in virulence and other phenotypes.
Infect. Immun.
66:89-97[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Franzot, S. P.,
I. F. Salkin, and A. Casadevall.
1999.
Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii: separate varietal status for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37:838-840[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Heitman, J.,
B. Allen,
J. A. Alspaugh, and K. J. Kwon-Chung.
1999.
On the origins of congenic MAT and MATa strains of the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans.
Fungal Genet. Biol.
28:1-5[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ikeda, R.,
A. Nishikawa,
T. Shinoda, and Y. Fukazawa.
1985.
Chemical characterization of capsular polysaccharide from Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A-D.
Microbiol. Immunol.
29:981-991[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kabasawa, K.,
H. Itagaki,
R. Ikeda,
T. Shinoda,
K. Kagaya, and Y. Fukazawa.
1991.
Evaluation of a new method for identification of Cryptococcus neoformans which uses serologic tests aided by selected biological tests.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
29:2873-2876[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J.
1976.
Morphogenesis of Filobasidiella neoformans, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Mycologia
68:821-833.
|
| 21.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J.
1975.
A new genus, Filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Mycologia
67:1197-1200.
|
| 22.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J.
1976.
A new species of Filobasidiella, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans B and C serotypes.
Mycologia
68:942-946.
|
| 23.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J., and J. E. Bennett.
1992.
Medical mycology, p. 397-446.
Lea & Febiger, Malvern, Pa.
|
| 24.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J.,
J. C. Edman, and B. L. Wickes.
1992.
Genetic association of mating types and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans.
Infect. Immun.
60:602-605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kwon-Chung, K. J., and T. J. Popkin.
1976.
Ultrastructure of septal complex in Filobasidiella neoformans (Cryptococcus neoformans).
J. Bacteriol.
126:524-528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Meyer, W.,
K. Marszewska,
M. Amirmostofian,
R. P. Igreja,
C. Hardtke,
K. Methling,
M. A. Viviani,
A. Chindamporn,
S. Sukroongreung,
M. A. John,
D. H. Ellis, and T. C. Sorrell.
1999.
Molecular typing of global isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA a pilot study to standardize techniques on which to base a detailed epidemiological survey.
Electrophoresis
20:1790-1799[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Odom, A.,
S. Muir,
E. Lim,
D. L. Toffaletti,
J. Perfect, and J. Heitman.
1997.
Calcineurin is required for virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans.
EMBO J.
16:2576-2589[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Perfect, J. R.,
N. Ketabchi,
G. M. Cox,
C. W. Ingram, and C. L. Beiser.
1993.
Karyotyping of Cryptococcus neoformans as an epidemiological tool.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
31:3305-3309[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Perfect, J. R.,
B. B. Magee, and P. T. Magee.
1989.
Separation of chromosomes of Cryptococcus neoformans by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.
Infect. Immun.
57:2624-2627[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Reiss, E.,
K. Tanaka,
G. Bruker,
V. Chazalet,
D. Coleman,
J. P. Debeaupuis,
R. Hanazawa,
J. P. Latge,
J. Lortholary,
K. Makimura,
C. J. Morrison,
S. Y. Murayama,
S. Naoe,
S. Paris,
J. Sarfati,
K. Shibuya,
D. Sullivan,
K. Uchida, and H. Yamaguchi.
1998.
Molecular diagnosis and epidemiology of fungal infections.
Med. Mycol.
36:249-257.
|
| 31.
|
Ruma, P.,
S. C. Chen,
T. C. Sorrell, and A. G. Brownlee.
1996.
Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans by random DNA amplification.
Lett. Appl. Microbiol.
23:312-316[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Sia, R. A.,
K. B. Lengeler, and J. Heitman.
2000.
Diploid strains of the pathogenic basidiomycete Cryptococcus neoformans are thermally dimorphic.
Fungal Genet. Biol.
29:153-163[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Takeo, K.,
R. Tanaka,
H. Taguchi, and K. Nishimura.
1993.
Analysis of ploidy and sexual characteristics of natural isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Can. J. Microbiol.
39:958-963[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Tanaka, R.,
K. Nishimura, and M. Miyaji.
1999.
Ploidy of serotype AD strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Med. Mycol.
40:31-34.
|
| 35.
|
Tanaka, R.,
H. Taguchi,
K. Takeo,
M. Miyaji, and K. Nishimura.
1996.
Determination of ploidy in Cryptococcus neoformans by flow cytometry.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
34:299-301[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Tolkacheva, T.,
P. McNamara,
E. Piekarz, and W. Courchesne.
1994.
Cloning of a Cryptococcus neoformans gene, GPA1, encoding a G-protein -subunit homolog.
Infect. Immun.
62:2849-2856[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Viviani, M. A.,
H. Wen,
A. Roverselli,
R. Caldarelli-Stefano,
M. Cogliate,
P. Ferrante, and A. M. Tortorano.
1997.
Identification by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting of Cryptococcus neoformans serotype AD.
J. Med. Vet. Mycol.
35:355-360[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Whelan, W. L., and K. J. Kwon-Chung.
1986.
Genetic complementation in Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Bacteriol.
166:924-929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
White, C. W., and E. S. Jacobson.
1985.
Occurrence of diploid strains of Cryptococcus neoformans.
J. Bacteriol.
161:1231-1232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Wickes, B. L.,
U. Edman, and J. C. Edman.
1997.
The Cryptococcus neoformans STE12 gene: a putative Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE12 homologue that is mating type specific.
Mol. Microbiol.
26:951-960[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Wickes, B. L.,
T. D. E. Moore, and K. J. Kwon-Chung.
1994.
Comparison of the electrophoretic karyotypes and chromosomal location of ten genes in the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans.
Microbiology
140:543-550[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Xu, J.,
R. J. Vilgalys, and T. G. Mitchell.
2000.
Multiple gene genealogies reveal dispersion and hybridization in the human pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans.
Mol. Ecol.
9:1471-1482[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Yue, C.,
L. M. Cavallo,
J. A. Alspaugh,
P. Wang,
G. M. Cox,
J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman.
1999.
The STE12 homolog is required for haploid filamentation but largely dispensable for mating and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans.
Genetics
153:1601-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, January 2001, p. 115-122, Vol. 69, No. 1
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.115-122.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lin, X., Nielsen, K., Patel, S., Heitman, J.
(2008). Impact of Mating Type, Serotype, and Ploidy on the Virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun.
76: 2923-2938
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sun, S., Xu, J.
(2007). Genetic Analyses of a Hybrid Cross Between Serotypes A and D Strains of the Human Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics
177: 1475-1486
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bovers, M., Diaz, M. R., Hagen, F., Spanjaard, L., Duim, B., Visser, C. E., Hoogveld, H. L., Scharringa, J., Hoepelman, I. M., Fell, J. W., Boekhout, T.
(2007). Identification of Genotypically Diverse Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Isolates by Luminex xMAP Technology. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 1874-1883
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Enache-Angoulvant, A., Chandenier, J., Symoens, F., Lacube, P., Bolognini, J., Douchet, C., Poirot, J. L., Hennequin, C.
(2007). Molecular Identification of Cryptococcus neoformans Serotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 1261-1265
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kavanaugh, L. A., Fraser, J. A., Dietrich, F. S.
(2006). Recent Evolution of the Human Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans by Intervarietal Transfer of a 14-Gene Fragment. Mol Biol Evol
23: 1879-1890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Litvintseva, A. P., Thakur, R., Vilgalys, R., Mitchell, T. G.
(2006). Multilocus Sequence Typing Reveals Three Genetic Subpopulations of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (Serotype A), Including a Unique Population in Botswana. Genetics
172: 2223-2238
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kojima, K., Bahn, Y.-S., Heitman, J.
(2006). Calcineurin, Mpk1 and Hog1 MAPK pathways independently control fludioxonil antifungal sensitivity in Cryptococcus neoformans.. Microbiology
152: 591-604
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nielsen, K., Marra, R. E., Hagen, F., Boekhout, T., Mitchell, T. G., Cox, G. M., Heitman, J.
(2005). Interaction Between Genetic Background and the Mating-Type Locus in Cryptococcus neoformans Virulence Potential. Genetics
171: 975-983
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Litvintseva, A. P., Kestenbaum, L., Vilgalys, R., Mitchell, T. G.
(2005). Comparative Analysis of Environmental and Clinical Populations of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 556-564
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bryan, R. A., Zaragoza, O., Zhang, T., Ortiz, G., Casadevall, A., Dadachova, E.
(2005). Radiological Studies Reveal Radial Differences in the Architecture of the Polysaccharide Capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell
4: 465-475
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marra, R. E., Huang, J. C., Fung, E., Nielsen, K., Heitman, J., Vilgalys, R., Mitchell, T. G.
(2004). A Genetic Linkage Map of Cryptococcus neoformans variety neoformans Serotype D (Filobasidiella neoformans). Genetics
167: 619-631
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barreto de Oliveira, M. T., Boekhout, T., Theelen, B., Hagen, F., Baroni, F. A., Lazera, M. S., Lengeler, K. B., Heitman, J., Rivera, I. N. G., Paula, C. R.
(2004). Cryptococcus neoformans Shows a Remarkable Genotypic Diversity in Brazil. J. Clin. Microbiol.
42: 1356-1359
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hicks, J. K., D'Souza, C. A., Cox, G. M., Heitman, J.
(2004). Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunits Have Divergent Roles in Virulence Factor Production in Two Varieties of the Fungal Pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell
3: 14-26
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Litvintseva, A. P., Marra, R. E., Nielsen, K., Heitman, J., Vilgalys, R., Mitchell, T. G.
(2003). Evidence of Sexual Recombination among Cryptococcus neoformans Serotype A Isolates in Sub-Saharan Africa. Eukaryot Cell
2: 1162-1168
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nielsen, K., Cox, G. M., Wang, P., Toffaletti, D. L., Perfect, J. R., Heitman, J.
(2003). Sexual Cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and Virulence of Congenic a and {alpha} Isolates. Infect. Immun.
71: 4831-4841
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanaka, R., Imanishi, Y., Nishimura, K.
(2003). Difference in FKS1 Gene Sequences between Serotypes A and D of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 4457-4459
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xu, J., Mitchell, T. G.
(2003). Comparative gene genealogical analyses of strains of serotype AD identify recombination in populations of serotypes A and D in the human pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology
149: 2147-2154
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Latouche, G. N., Huynh, M., Sorrell, T. C., Meyer, W.
(2003). PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of the Phospholipase B (PLB1) Gene for Subtyping of Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 2080-2086
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yan, Z., Xu, J.
(2003). Mitochondria Are Inherited From the MATa Parent in Crosses of the Basidiomycete Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics
163: 1315-1325
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keller, S. M., Viviani, M. A., Esposto, M. C., Cogliati, M., Wickes, B. L.
(2003). Molecular and genetic characterization of a serotype A MATaCryptococcus neoformans isolate. Microbiology
149: 131-142
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chaturvedi, V., Fan, J., Stein, B., Behr, M. J., Samsonoff, W. A., Wickes, B. L., Chaturvedi, S.
(2002). Molecular Genetic Analyses of Mating Pheromones Reveal Intervariety Mating or Hybridization in Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun.
70: 5225-5235
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yan, Z., Li, X., Xu, J.
(2002). Geographic Distribution of Mating Type Alleles of Cryptococcus neoformans in Four Areas of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol.
40: 965-972
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xu, J., Luo, G., Vilgalys, R. J., Brandt, M. E., Mitchell, T. G.
(2002). Multiple origins of hybrid strains of Cryptococcus neoformans with serotype AD. Microbiology
148: 203-212
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cogliati, M., Esposto, M. C., Clarke, D. L., Wickes, B. L., Viviani, M. A.
(2001). Origin of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans Diploid Strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.
39: 3889-3894
[Abstract]
[Full Text]