Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, October 2001, p. 6520-6522, Vol. 69, No. 10
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6520-6522.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Regulation of Streptococcus gordonii sspB by the
sspA Gene Product
Azza
El-Sabaeny,1,2
Donald R.
Demuth,3 and
Richard J.
Lamont1,*
Department of Oral Biology, University of
Washington, Seattle, Washington 981951;
Department of Biochemistry, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191043; and
Department of Botany and Microbiology, University of
Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt2
Received 12 February 2001/Returned for modification 17 April
2001/Accepted 10 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Streptococcus gordonii expresses two related
adhesins, SspA and SspB, the genes for which are adjacent on the
chromosome and are regulated independently. Although the adhesins are
functionally similar, the sspA promoter is more active
than that of sspB. In this study we show an additional
role for SspA in the control of sspB activity. Gel shift
and DNA footprinting assays demonstrate that the SspA protein binds to
the sspB promoter and protects a region 233 to 264 bp
upstream of the predicted
35 promoter element. The responsiveness of
the sspB promoter to SspA was investigated with a
promoter-cat reporter. Expression of the
sspB promoter was reduced by over 60% in an
SspA-deficient mutant of S. gordonii. These results
indicate that expression of S. gordonii sspB is positively regulated by the sspA gene product.
 |
TEXT |
Streptococcus gordonii is
a prominent colonizer of dental plaque, a microbial biofilm that is
strongly associated with the development of caries and periodontal
diseases. S. gordonii exhibits a wide range of adherence
properties that are well characterized at the molecular level
(8). Ssp cell surface proteins are multifunctional adhesins that participate in binding reactions with salivary
agglutinins and with other plaque bacteria such as Porphyromonas
gingivalis, an aggressive periodontal pathogen (1, 2,
7). Such interbacterial adhesive interactions are important in
the development of plaque and in its transition from a benign
accumulation to a potentially pathogenic entity.
In strains of S. gordonii thus far examined, tandem genes
encode SspA and SspB polypeptides that are highly similar with respect to structure and adhesive function (2, 6). However, the sspA and sspB genes possess individual promoter
regions and are differentially regulated in response to environmental
conditions (4). Further, as measured by
promoter-cat reporter constructs, transcriptional activity
of the sspA promoter is about threefold higher than that of
the sspB promoter over a range of growth conditions (4). SspA and SspB may thus have distinct roles to play
for the organism. In this study we investigated regulation of the sspB gene by the sspA gene product.
SspA binds to the sspB promoter region.
To
determine whether the SspA polypeptide can bind to the sspB
upstream region, a gel mobility shift assay was performed using the
BandShift kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Recombinant SspA protein
was expressed from the sspA gene and regulatory sequences (2) in Escherichia coli DH5
cultured in
Luria-Bertani broth. Crude periplasmic preparations were
generated by osmotic shock (5). The SspA polypeptide was
further purified by Sepharose 6B (Pharmacia) and DEAE-Sephadex (Sigma)
chromatography. Purity was assessed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and a single band of SspA
protein was detected following silver staining. The region
347 to
17 bp from the sspB translational start site
(3) was amplified by PCR and cloned into pCRII (TOPO vector; Invitrogen). A 364-bp double-stranded EcoRI fragment
containing the sspB promoter region was used for gel shift
analysis. DNA (5 ng) was 5' labeled with
-32P
and purified on an Atlas Nucleospin column (Clontech). Binding reactions of SspA (4 µg of protein) and target DNA were carried out
in binding buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 50% glycerol, 1% Nonidet P-40) and mixed with a
synthetic competitor poly(dI-dC) in a total of 20 µl and then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Samples were analyzed on a
5% polyacrylamide gel (run in low-ionic-strength gel buffer: 70 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 30 mM sodium acetate, 10 mM EDTA) for 90 min at 10 V/cm at 4°C. As shown in Fig. 1,
purified SspA protein was capable of binding to and retarding the
mobility of the sspB upstream region. SspA-DNA complex
formation was not affected by E. coli DNA (0.1 mg/ml),
indicating specificity of binding (Fig. 1, lane 4). In contrast, the
presence of excess unlabeled target DNA abolished the SspA-mediated gel
shift (Fig. 1, lane 3). Additional evidence of specificity was provided
by the failure of an E. coli extract containing an
irrelevant protein (EBNA-1) to shift the target DNA (Fig. 1, lane 5).

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis of binding of
SspA to the sspB upstream promoter-containing region. A
364-bp 32P-labeled sspB upstream fragment
was used as the probe. Reaction mixtures contained probe alone (lane
1), probe with SspA protein (lane 2), probe with SspA and excess
unlabeled probe (lane 3), probe with SspA protein and excess E.
coli DNA (lane 4), or probe with sonicated E.
coli extract containing cloned DNA binding domain from
EBNA-1 (lane 5).
|
|
SspA binding protects a 32-bp region of the sspB
promoter.
To identify the SspA binding site upstream of the
sspB gene, DNase I footprinting was performed. As
preliminary results indicated that the protected region was at the 5'
end of the region used for gel shift analysis, a 5' extended target was
used for footprinting. A 279-bp upstream
EcoRI-XmaI sspB DNA fragment (
418 to
139 from the translational start site) was amplified by PCR and mixed
with purified SspA protein in binding buffer (described above)
containing 10 mM MgCl2. Digestion was initiated
by the addition of 2 U of DNase I (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The
reactions were stopped by the addition of diluted DNase stop solution
(768 mM sodium acetate, 128 mM EDTA, 0.56% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 256 µg of yeast RNA/ml) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the mixtures
were extracted with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform (1:1). The nucleic acids were then precipitated, dried, resuspended in loading buffer (deionized formamide containing 10 mM EDTA, 0.3% bromophenol blue, and 0.3% xylene cyanol), and electrophoresed in 8%
polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea. The Maxam and Gilbert A+G
sequencing ladder (9) was used as a size standard for the
DNase I protection experiments. The results revealed that a 32-bp
region of the sspB upstream sequence is fully protected from
DNase I digestion in the presence of SspA (Fig.
2). This protected sequence spans
342 to
311 bp from the translational start site of the sspB
promoter and is 233 to 264 bp upstream of the predicted
35 promoter
element.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
(A) DNase I footprint of protection by SspA of a 279-bp
sspB upstream region. Lane 1, Maxam and Gilbert A+G
ladder; lanes 2 to 5, DNase I treatment in the presence of 0, 1, 2, and
4 µg of SspA, respectively. The 32-bp protected sequence is indicated
by a bracket. (B) DNA sequence upstream of sspB. The
32-bp region protected from DNase I digestion is underlined.
|
|
Disruption of the sspA gene affects
sspB expression.
To determine whether the binding
of SspA to the sspB upstream region influences transcription
of sspB in S. gordonii, an sspB promoter-cat86 reporter fusion was introduced into the
genome of an SspA-deficient strain of S. gordonii. S. gordonii strains were cultured aerobically in Trypticase peptone
broth supplemented with yeast extract (5 mg/ml) and 0.5% glucose at
37°C. S. gordonii OB220 (kindly provided by Howard
Jenkinson, University of Bristol) is derived from strain DL1 and
contains an insertional inactivation of the sspA gene
(2). Recombinant strain HA00 was described previously
(4) and is a derivative of DL1 containing a chromosomal sspB promoter-cat reporter fusion. Strain HA02
was constructed by a strategy similar to that for HA00 and is a
derivative of OB220 (SspA deficient) containing a
chromosomal sspB promoter-cat reporter fusion.
Briefly, suicide plasmid pHA145 (4), which encodes
tetracycline resistance and contains a 1.1-kb BamHI fragment with the S. gordonii sspB promoter-cat fusion,
was isolated by Wizard Miniprep (Promega) and integrated into the
chromosome of OB220. Transformants resulting from a single (Campbell)
crossover were selected on brain heart infusion agar containing
tetracycline (10 µg/ml).
To confirm the integration events, nylon blots of
HindIII- or EcoRI-digested chromosomal DNA
were probed with biotin-labeled sspB promoter or the
cat gene (not shown). In addition, the inserted fragment was
amplified by PCR and sequenced directly using a cat defined
primer (5'-CAGGAGTCCAAATACCAGAGAAT-3'). Hence, the
recombinant strains HA00
(sspBp:cat) and HA02
(SspA-deficient sspBp:cat)
contain two copies of the sspB promoter, one driving
expression of CAT (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) and the other
driving expression of the structural SspB protein. Strains HA00 and
HA02 were grown in batch culture, and CAT activity was measured over
time. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (6,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and washed once in TPE buffer (100 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride).
Cells were then suspended in spheroplasting buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH
6.8], 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2% raffinose, 500 U of mutanolysin/ml) and incubated at
37°C for 30 min. To disrupt the cells, 0.1-ml glass beads (0.10 to
0.11 mm in diameter; Braun Melsugen AG) and 0.4 ml of ice-cold TPE
buffer were added and the cells were vortex mixed twice for 30 s.
Suspensions were then centrifuged (12,000 × g, 20 min,
4°C) to pellet beads and cell debris, and supernatants were removed
for enzyme assays. Protein concentrations were determined by a Bio-Rad
protein assay kit with bovine gamma globulin as the standard. CAT
enzyme activity was assayed by the spectrophotometric method of Shaw
(10), utilizing a Beckman DU-70 recording
spectrophotometer with a temperature-controlled cuvette chamber.
Briefly, 0.05 ml of streptococcal cell extract (containing 40 to 60 µg of protein) was added to a 0.5-ml reaction mixture (100 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 0.1 mM acetyl coenzyme A [Sigma], 1 mM
5,5'-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid) in 1-ml glass cuvettes. The
reaction mixture was warmed at 37°C for 2 min, and the background
change in absorbance at 412 nm was recorded for a further 2 min.
Chloramphenicol (16 µl, 0.1 mM) was added, and the change in
absorbance was recorded for 2 min. The reaction rate was determined
from the linear portion of the graph, corrected for the background
change in A412, and divided by 0.0136 to yield CAT activity expressed as nanomoles of chloramphenicol
acetylated per minute at 37°C.
As shown in Fig. 3, sspB
promoter activity, as determined by CAT specific activity, was reduced
by 60 to 95% over the growth curve in strain HA02 (SspA deficient)
compared to HA00 (SspA+). In both strains,
sspB promoter activity was lowest in the lag phase and
increased 10-fold in late-log-phase cells, as observed previously
(4), indicating that growth phase-dependent regulation of
sspB is independent of SspA and was not disrupted by the
chromosomal insertions. Growth curves of HA00 and of HA02 were similar,
although HA02 grew slower and to a slightly lower final density.
However, previous results (4) demonstrated that
sspB promoter-driven cat expression is not
affected by doubling time. Thus, the reduction in sspB
expression in HA02 is unlikely to be a reflection of the reduced growth
rate of the organism. The results are therefore consistent with
positive regulation of sspB by the sspA gene
product. It is possible that the presence of ermAM, which
was used to disrupt sspA (2), affects
transcription of sspB. However, sspA and sspB are independently transcribed, and a stem-loop
structure that resembles a transcription terminator exists just
downstream of sspA (3, 4, 7), thus arguing
against this situation. Furthermore, expression of SspB occurs in the
sspA mutant strain (2) and other control
pathways are not disrupted in HA02, as evidenced by the response of the
sspB promoter to the growth phase of the organism.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Growth phase and expression of sspB in an
SspA+ (strain HA00) or SspA (strain HA02)
background. Optical densities (O.D.) and CAT activities were measured
at different incubation times. The data are from a representative of
three experiments.
|
|
The advantages to S. gordonii conferred by the production of
two structurally and functionally related adhesins (SspA and SspB) can
be hypothesized to include more avid attachment, diversity of substrate
recognition, and immune avoidance. This arrangement, however, may
necessitate tightly controlled expression of the genes. Our previous
studies have shown that the sspA and sspB genes
each possess functional promoters with differing activities that
respond independently to environmental cues (4). The
results of this study indicate that in addition to its role as a
surface adhesin, intracellular SspA can positively regulate
transcription of the sspB gene through binding to a region
233 to 264 bp upstream of the sspB
35 site. Thus, although
the transcriptional activities of sspA and sspB
differ according to prevailing conditions in the oral cavity,
expression of SspA and SspB is linked through the activity of the SspA protein.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Howard Jenkinson for provision of strains and helpful discussions.
This work was supported by NIDCR grants DE12505, DE13061, and DE07023.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Oral Biology, P.O. Box 357132, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7132. Phone: (206) 616-9459. Fax: (206) 685-3162. E-mail: lamon{at}u.washington.edu.
Editor:
V. J. DiRita
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Brooks, W.,
D. R. Demuth,
S. Gil, and R. J. Lamont.
1997.
Identification of a Streptococcus gordonii SspB domain that mediates adhesion to Porphyromonas gingivalis.
Infect. Immun.
65:3753-3758[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Demuth, D. R.,
Y. Duan,
W. Brooks,
A. R. Holmes,
R. McNab, and H. F. Jenkinson.
1996.
Tandem genes encode cell-surface polypeptides SspA and SspB which mediate adhesion of the oral bacterium Streptococcus gordonii to human and bacterial receptors.
Mol. Microbiol.
20:403-413[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Demuth, D. R.,
Y. Duan,
H. F. Jenkinson,
R. McNab,
S. Gil, and R. J. Lamont.
1997.
Interruption of the Streptococcus gordonii M5 sspA/sspB intergenic region by an insertion sequence related to IS1167 of Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Microbiology
143:2047-2055[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
El-Sabaeny, A.,
D. R. Demuth,
Y. Park, and R. J. Lamont.
2000.
Environmental conditions modulate the expression of the sspA and sspB genes in Streptococcus gordonii.
Microb. Pathog.
29:101-113[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Heppel, L. A.
1967.
Selective release of enzymes from bacteria.
Science
156:1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Holmes, A. R.,
C. Gilbert,
J. M. Wells, and H. F. Jenkinson.
1998.
Binding properties of Streptococcus gordonii SspA and SspB (antigen I/II family) polypeptides expressed on the cell surface of Lactococcus lactis MG1363.
Infect. Immun.
66:4633-4639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Jenkinson, H. F., and D. R. Demuth.
1997.
Structure, function and immunogenicity of streptococcal antigen I/II polypeptides.
Mol. Microbiol.
23:183-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Jenkinson, H. F., and R. J. Lamont.
1997.
Streptococcal adhesion and colonization.
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.
8:175-200[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Maxam, A. M., and W. Gilbert.
1980.
Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.
Methods Enzymol.
65:499-560[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Shaw, W. V.
1975.
Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase from chloramphenicol-resistant bacteria.
Methods Enzymol.
43:737-755[Medline].
|
Infection and Immunity, October 2001, p. 6520-6522, Vol. 69, No. 10
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6520-6522.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nobbs, A. H., Vajna, R. M., Johnson, J. R., Zhang, Y., Erlandsen, S. L., Oli, M. W., Kreth, J., Brady, L. J., Herzberg, M. C.
(2007). Consequences of a sortase A mutation in Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology
153: 4088-4097
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, Y., Lei, Y., Nobbs, A., Khammanivong, A., Herzberg, M. C.
(2005). Inactivation of Streptococcus gordonii SspAB Alters Expression of Multiple Adhesin Genes. Infect. Immun.
73: 3351-3357
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Demuth, D. R., Irvine, D. C.
(2002). Structural and Functional Variation within the Alanine-Rich Repetitive Domain of Streptococcal Antigen I/II. Infect. Immun.
70: 6389-6398
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kolenbrander, P. E., Andersen, R. N., Blehert, D. S., Egland, P. G., Foster, J. S., Palmer, R. J. Jr.
(2002). Communication among Oral Bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 486-505
[Abstract]
[Full Text]