This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Liebau, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Liebau, E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, December 2001, p. 7718-7728, Vol. 69, No. 12
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7718-7728.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Structural Analysis and Antibody Response to the Extracellular Glutathione S-Transferases from Onchocerca volvulus

Alexandra Sommer,1 Manfred Nimtz,2 Harald S. Conradt,2 Norbert Brattig,1 Kay Boettcher,3 Peter Fischer,1 Rolf D. Walter,1 and Eva Liebau1,*

Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, 20359 Hamburg,1 Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Forschung mBH, 38124 Braunschweig,2 and LION Bioscience AG, 69120 Heidelberg,3 Germany

Received 2 March 2001/Returned for modification 11 June 2001/Accepted 23 August 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Onchocerca volvulus is a human pathogenic filarial parasite which, like other parasitic nematodes, is capable of surviving in an immunologically competent host by employing a variety of immune evasion strategies and defense mechanisms including the detoxification and repair mechanisms of the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). In this study we analyzed the glycosylation pattern and the immunological properties of extracellular O. volvulus GST1a and -1b (OvGST1a and -1b). The enzymes differ in only 10 amino acids, and both are glycoproteins that have cleavable signal peptides and unusual N-terminal extensions. These characteristics have not been described for other GSTs so far. Mass spectrometry analyses indicate that both enzymes carry high-mannose type oligosaccharides on at least four glycosylation sites. Glycosylation sites 1 to 3 of OvGST1a (OvGST1b sites 2 to 4) are occupied by truncated N-glycans (Man2GlcNAc2 to Man5GlcNAc2), and N glycosylation site 4 of OvGST1a (OvGST1b site 5) carries Man5GlcNAc2 to Man9GlcNAc2. To analyze the capacity of these secretory GSTs to stimulate host immune responses, we studied the antibody responses of onchocerciasis patients against the native affinity-purified OvGST1a and -1b. By enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay we showed that OvGST1a and -1b are immunodominant antigens, with less than 7% nonresponder patients. A direct comparison of the antibody responses to the glycosylated and deglycosylated forms demonstrates the high immunogenicity of the N-glycans. Analyses of the antibody responses to the unusual N-terminal extension show an enhanced recognition of this portion by patients as opposed to recognition of the recombinant protein without extension.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Onchocerca volvulus is the causative agent of onchocerciasis, a disease that affects about 20 million people in Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and Central and South America. The control of this disease is largely dependent on administration of annual doses of ivermectin, a drug that is able to kill the microfilariae but not the adult worms (22).

The spectrum of O. volvulus infection varies from asymptomatic microfilardermia often associated with immunological hyporesponsiveness to severe skin and eye diseases including onchodermatitis and blindness. Establishment of infection and disease development are dependent on the specific antigen recognition and immune response of the host. The complex immune response is triggered by numerous different filarial antigens at the same time. To elucidate the mechanism of the immune response, it is essential to explore the specific reactions to individual, native parasite antigens.

The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of detoxification enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of reduced glutathione (GSH) to xenobiotic and endogenous electrophilic compounds (25, 49, 55, 56). Besides having a role in detoxification, they are involved in the protection of tissues against oxidative damage and in the intracellular transport of hydrophobic substrates as noncatalytic carrier proteins (ligandins) (for recent reviews see references 14, 26, and 52). In a parasitic context it is especially important to consider their function in the regulation of the stress response, in the detoxification of lipid peroxidation products, in drug resistance, and possibly in the modulation of the host immune defense mechanisms (8, 16, 42).

Several studies demonstrate the participation of filarial GSTs in the defense against oxidative stress (34, 35). The potential to protect the parasite against host immunity makes them attractive candidate vaccine antigens (11). The significant differences between the tertiary structure of the helminth GSTs and that of the host enzymes make the GSTs promising chemotherapeutic targets (9).

From the perspective of antibody reactivity, the most immunogenic filarial antigens that have been identified include paramyosin, tropomyosin, OvALT-1, SXP1, and chitinase (1, 18, 21, 30). The ease of recombinant production of these and other potential vaccine molecules has made vaccination trials using various animal models possible. However, as a result of this, the role that carbohydrates and other nonprotein determinants play in the immune responses to parasites has been undervalued. However, it is well recognized that most of the immunodominant antigens either are excreted or secreted proteins or are abundant constituents of the nematode surface that are glycosylated (36, 38).

The O. volvulus GST1a and -1b (OvGST1a and -1b) are unique GSTs in that they are glycoproteins possessing signal peptides that are cleaved off in the process of producing the mature protein. The mature protein starts with a 25-amino-acid extension not present in other GSTs. The ultrastructural localization of the secretory OvGST1a and -1b in parts of the cuticle and in the outer lamellae of the hypodermis is consistent with the fact that they are secretory proteins (31). The structures of the N-glycans have been determined, and a three-dimensional model has been created to demonstrate their localization profile. By virtue of the potential significance of OvGST1a and 1b as immunoprophylactic targets, we have concentrated our efforts on the immunological relevance of the N-glycans and of the uncommon N-terminal extension.

(This work was conducted by A. Sommer in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a PhD from the University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.)


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Parasites, preparation, and purification of native OvGST1a and -1b. Nodules containing O. volvulus female adults were removed from untreated patients with generalized onchocerciasis in Benin, as described previously (2). Nodulectomies for research purposes were approved by the Ethics Commission of the Medical Board Hamburg. Adult worms were homogenized on ice with a glass and glass potter in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, containing 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenate was centrifuged for 1 h at 100,000 × g, and the native OvGSTs were purified from the supernatant as previously described (32).

Production of recombinant OvGST1a and -1b. The different OvGST constructs were cloned into expression vector pJC20 and transformed in Escherichia coli strain BL21. Expression of recombinant OvGST1a (rOvGST1a) and -1b, followed by purification using GSH-Sepharose, was done as previously described (33).

Site-directed mutagenesis. To obtain the mutation of M25 to A25 in OvGST1a, PCR was performed with the specific sense oligonucleotide 5'-GCTACAACCTCAAGCGGAAAAGTACACATTAAC-3' and antisense oligonucleotide 5'-GTTAATGTGTACTTTTCCGCTTGAGGTTGTAGC-3' using 1:100 (vol/vol) OvGST1a/pJC40 as the template. Following PCR using Pfu polymerase, the products were incubated with DpnI for 1 h at 37°C and 1/10 (vol/vol) was transformed in E. coli strain DH5alpha .

Synthesis of two 17-mer peptides of the N-terminal extension. The following overlapping peptides of the N-terminal extension, coupled to poly-L-lysine, were synthesized at IPF PharmaCeuticals GmbH: (ASSNANQAITSENSIKP)8K7A and (AITSENSIKPKGKLQPQ)8K7A.

Modeling, model refinement, and structure validation. Three-dimensional models were generated based on the crystal structure of the squid sigma class GST (PDB code: 1GSQ) (19). The primary amino acid sequences of OvGST1a and the squid GST have a similarity of 45%, with 25% identical amino acids. The modeling of the three-dimensional structure of OvGST1 followed a standard stepwise procedure, starting with an alignment of the target sequence onto the template structure using the Malign program. Due to the missing N-terminal 25 amino acids in the template, this stretch of amino acids was omitted in the modeling steps. The initial model was generated by the MODELLER4 package (48), and a first energy minimization step was performed using the CHARMM force field (7). Following the superpositioning of the protein structures, refinements were carried out with the AMBER force field (45). Subsequently, the energy minimization was performed with 100 steps of steepest descent followed by 100 steps of a quasi-Newton minimization (46) to alleviate steric clashes between atoms and obtain a rational peptide geometry. The quality of the model was assessed using different validation tools. The OvGST1a structure was validated with the program PROCHECK (29) at each step of the model building. No significant geometric violations were detected in the final model. Molecular visualization was carried out with the programs MOLSCRIPT and Raster3D (41).

Deglycosylation of the native OvGST1a and -1b. The native OvGSTs were dialyzed against 10 mM EDTA-50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, heated at 80°C for 2 min, and then incubated overnight with the appropriate amount of N-glycosidase F at 37°C.

The endoglycosidase H digestion was performed in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.8, as described above. The deglycosylation of OvGST1a and -1b was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the proteins were revealed by silver staining or by the use of the Glyco-Track kit (Oxford Glycosystems) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

ELISA. The reactivity of the N-glycans to patient sera was assessed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The optimal coating concentration of the recombinant and native antigens and serum dilutions were determined by a checkerboard titration ELISA using a pool of sera from O. volvulus-infected individuals. Following dialysis against 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, the glycosylated and deglycosylated native OvGSTs were covalently coupled to activated CovaLink NH plates (Nunc) at a concentration of 1 µg/ml. The rOvGSTs were used at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml. The antigens were incubated overnight at room temperature, washed three times with distilled water, and then blocked with 5% (wt/vol) dry milk-PBS, pH 7.5. All sera were used at a dilution of 1/400 (vol/vol). Bound antibodies were detected with peroxidase-conjugated antibodies against human immunoglobulin G (IgG) using tetramethylbenzidine as the substrate. Between each incubation step, five washing cycles with PBS-16.9 g of NaCl/liter-10 g of MgCl2/liter-0.05% Tween 20 were performed. After the substrate reaction was stopped by 0.5 M H2SO4, the optical density at 450 nm (OD450) was measured. Sera from confirmed microfilaria-positive patients with generalized onchocerciasis (38 samples) were obtained from Benin and Guinea (5, 6). Negative controls included experiments using irrelevant proteins for coating and experiments performed without coating or serum. To exclude the influence that preheating of OvGST1a and -1b before deglycosylation has on antibody recognition, comparative ELISA of the native proteins was performed with and without preheating and overnight incubation at 37°C. African control sera (four samples) and sera from Europeans not exposed to filariae (five samples) were used to determine the cutoff level. As a positive control, one test serum of a patient with generalized onchocerciasis with known high antibody concentration was included on each test plate, and only intra- and interassay variations less than 10% were accepted.

For the analysis of the cross-reactivity of the N-terminal extension, the following sera of confirmed O. volvulus-negative persons infected with different helminths were used: Schistosoma mansoni, three individual sera; Loa loa, three sera; Trichinella spiralis, four pools with three sera per pool; Ascaris lumbricoides, five pools with three sera per pool; Brugia malayi and Wuchereria bancrofti, each five pools with two sera per pool.

Statistical analysis. Differences between the data in two groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test and the paired and unpaired Wilcoxon test. A P value of <0.05 was regarded as significant.

Preparation of native OvGST1a and -1b for mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. Purified native OvGST1a and -1b were dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, followed by heating at 80°C for 2 min. The proteins were incubated overnight at 37°C with trypsin at a 30:1 ratio in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1-0.1 mM dithiothreitol-0.02% (wt/vol) NaN3. Following a second dialysis against 10 mM ammonium hydrogencarbonate, pH 7.4, the peptide mixture was lyophilized and stored at -20°C until use.

HPLC and ESI-MS/MS. The tryptic peptide mixtures (approximately 100 pmol) were analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 172Å microbore high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system using an Aquapore OD-300 C18 column (1.0 by 100 mm) at a flow rate of 40 µl/min and a linear gradient from 4 to 56% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid and 4 mM ammonium acetate. Elution of peptides was monitored by UV absorption at 214 nm and by MS on a TSQ 700 triple-quadrupole instrument equipped with a Finnigan ES ion source connected on line to the HPLC system. In a preparative run, (glyco)peptide fractions were collected manually and subjected to Edman sequencing (Applied Biosystems; model 475A). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) MS and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) analysis are described below.

MALDI-TOF MS. For analysis by MALDI-TOF MS the (glyco)peptide fractions were measured using a matrix of 19 mg of alpha -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 400 µl of acetonitrile and 600 µl of 0.1% (vol/vol) trifluoroacetic acid in water. The sample solution was mixed with the same volume of the respective matrix. The concentration of the analyte mixture was 1 to 10 pmol/µl. Determination of the molecular masses was carried out by positive-ion MALDI-TOF MS using a Bruker REFLEX time-of-flight instrument as described by Grabenhorst et al. (15).

ESI-MS/MS. For analysis by ESI-MS/MS the (glyco)peptide samples (approximately 3 µl) were used to fill gold-coated nanospray glass capillaries (Protana, Odense, Denmark). The tip of the capillary was placed orthogonally in front of the entrance hole of a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom) equipped with a nanospray ion source, and a voltage of approximately -1,000 V was applied. For collision-induced dissociation experiments, parent ions were selectively transmitted from the quadrupole mass analyzer into the collision cell. Argon was used as the collision gas, and the kinetic energy was set at around -35 eV. The resulting daughter ions were then separated by an orthogonal time-of-flight mass analyzer (50).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

Comparison of the amino acid sequences of OvGST1a and OvGST1b. The purification of glutathione-binding proteins from O. volvulus extract, produced by centrifugation at 100,000 × g, by GSH affinity chromatography yielded three proteins of roughly 34, 31, and 26 kDa, representing OvGST1b, OvGST1a, and OvGST2, respectively (31, 32). The average content of purified OvGST1a and -1b was 0.5 µg/adult female worm. Only the fractions containing native OvGST1a and -1b were used for further experiments. Figure 1, lane A, demonstrates the purification of native OvGST1a and -1b. Due to the microheterogeneity of the N-glycans, a broader band between 31 and 33 kDa, representing OvGST1a, is seen whereas OvGST1b is seen as the upper, very faint band. Immunoblot analysis using O. volvulus extract and anti-rOvGST1 demonstrates the same staining pattern (31). This strongly indicates that the observed difference in the quantities of OvGST1a and -1b is not due to the purification procedures, i.e., different affinities for binding to GSH-Sepharose, but rather reflects the situation in the worm.


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Purification and deglycosylation of native OvGST1a and -1b. The proteins were separated on an SDS-12.5% PAGE gel. Lane A, OvGST1a and OvGST1b at 31 to 33 and about 34 kDa, respectively. The relatively broad bands can be explained by N-glycan microheterogeneity. For comparison, rOvGST1a raised in E. coli was also applied (lane B). Lane C, completely deglycosylated proteins after N-glycosidase F treatment; lane D, digestion with endoglycosidase H, leaving a single GlcNAc residue at each glycosylation site in place. Left, migration positions of molecular mass standard proteins.

To unequivocally demonstrate the presence of two different isoforms of OvGST1, the affinity-purified native OvGSTs were tryptically digested and analyzed by HPLC-MS for the abundances of two theoretical cleavage products (A and B) of OvGST1a and OvGST1b, differing only in one amino acid (A: 99FGLLGTND[A]WEEAK111; B: 112IMAVVLNID[E] ELFQK125; amino acid of OvGST1b is in brackets). The identity of the expected peptide fragments was demonstrated by ESI-MS/MS peptide sequencing of the respective fractions collected from the preparative HPLC run (data not shown). The ratio between OvGST1a and -1b found by this method was approximately 7:1.

Nucleotide differences found in the respective cDNAs for OvGST1a and -1b result in 10 structural changes (Fig. 2). Southern blot and sequence analyses demonstrate that OvGST1a and -1b are encoded by separate genes. The observed nucleotide differences are confirmed by sequence analysis of the respective genomic copy (E. Liebau et al., unpublished results). These amino acid differences are found mainly in the N-terminal region of the mature protein, with 4 out of 10 amino acid changes located in the N-terminal extension. The replacement of polar residues with more-hydrophilic, charged residues changes the character of the N-terminal extension of OvGST1b from a neutral one to a more hydrophilic one.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Alignment of the amino acid sequences of OvGST1a and OvGST1b. The signal peptide, comprising 25 amino acids, is indicated. Arrows, cleavage site, N-terminal extension, and tryptic cleavage sites. The numbering of the respective amino acids begins at position 1 (in boldface), which corresponds to the signal peptide cleavage site of the mature protein. The numbers above the sequences correspond to the tryptic fragments shown in Table 1. The differences between OvGST1a and -1b are in boldface.

Isolation and characterization of N-linked oligosaccharides. As previously shown (31), the native enzymes are extensively glycosylated. The glycosylation accounts for approximately 13 and 20% (OvGST1a and OvGST1b, respectively) of their apparent masses (Fig. 1, lane A). For comparison the nonglycosylated protein expressed in E. coli (Fig. 1, lane B) as well as the fully deglycosylated peptide backbone after N-glycanase F treatment (Fig. 1, lane C) were run on the same SDS-PAGE gel. To characterize the glycan structure of the purified native proteins, OvGST1a and -1b were subjected to tryptic digestion. There were 27 tryptic cleavage sites for both OvGSTs, with one specific cleavage site for each protein. Cleavage between amino acids 3 and 4 in OvGST1b resulted in specific fragments 1a and 1b, and cleavage between amino acids 69 and 70 of OvGST1a generated specific fragments 10a and 10b (Fig. 2; Table 1). The resulting fragments were separated by microbore HPLC, and the elution was monitored by UV absorption and MS. Figure 3 shows the corresponding UV trace at 214 nm. The peaks identified by HPLC-MS analysis are marked (Fig. 3; Table 1); further peaks correspond to nonpeptide contaminants as well as to trypsin fragments. Most of the nonglycosylated tryptic peptides were identified; peptides <400 Da, however, were not detected in the HPLC-MS analysis (Fig. 3 and Table 1). All OvGST1a peptides bearing a glycosylation site were identified by the characteristic pattern of molecular ions due to the attachment of different glycans (as shown for glycopeptides 1 and 4 in Fig. 4). On account of the small quantity of OvGST1b and the minute differences between both proteins observed, only two specific glycopeptides of OvGST1b were identified. Glycopeptide 1, consisting of amino acids 4 to 18 (GP14-18) of OvGST1b, could not be detected and analyzed (Table 1). On all four glycosylation sites of OvGST1a, molecular ions with mass increments of 162 Da were detected, suggesting the presence of high-mannose type structures differing in the number of mannose residues attached, as shown in Fig. 4 for GP144-57 and GP4144-156. The assignment and the ratios of the glycan structures found at individual glycosylation sites of OvGST1a are as follows: for GP144-57, Man5/Man4/Man3 ratio = 1:0.32:0.1; for GP270-98, Man5/Man4/Man3 ratio = 1:0.51:0.07; for GP3134-137, Man5/Man4/Man3 ratio = 1:0.13:0.07; for GP4144-156, Man5/Man6/Man7/Man8/Man4/Man3/Man9 ratio = 1:0.48:0.15:0.1:0.05:0.04:0.01. This demonstrates that Man5GlcNAc2 is the dominant glycoform present at all four glycosylation sites of OvGST1a. Besides identifying this glycoform as dominant, the analysis revealed that about 30% of the N-glycans found are smaller (Man3 and Man4) than those described for mammals. Interestingly, whereas the structures of Man2GlcNAc2 to Man5GlcNAc2 and the relative ratios of oligosaccharides linked to glycosylation sites 1 (N50), 2 (N79), and 3 (N134) appear to be rather similar, at glycosylation site 4 (N144) clearly larger structures, bearing Man5GlcNAc2 to Man9GlcNAc2, were detected. For further characterization of the (glyco)peptides, individual fractions from another HPLC run were collected and the amino acid sequences of all glycopeptides were confirmed by Edman sequencing. Additionally, the MALDI-TOF MS spectrum shows the protonated molecular ions of tryptic GP144-57 bearing two to five mannose residues (Fig. 4). Small amounts of a tryptic peptide with one missing cleavage site incorporating glycosylation site 4 (N144) were detected; this peptide bears high-mannose type glycans (Man5 to Man9) much larger than those found for the first glycosylation site (Fig. 4). This confirms the HPLC and ESI-MS/MS results for this site obtained for the completely digested GP4144-156. The major components of the collected HPLC fractions were further characterized by ESI-MS/MS experiments. The daughter ion spectrum of doubly charged GP144-57 showed an abundance of fragment ions generated by the cleavage of monosaccharide bonds, as is explained in the fragmentation scheme of Fig. 5. In particular, the successive elimination of five hexose residues indicates the presence of a high-mannose type glycan. Peptide sequence-specific fragments from the amino and carboxy termini were much weaker but nevertheless allowed the confirmation of the peptide sequence. The other major glycopeptides were characterized in an analogous way.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Molecular weights of the tryptic fragments of OvGST1a and -1b analyzed by HPLC-MSa



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Tryptic peptide mapping of the native OvGST1a and OvGST1b. The protein preparation was digested with trypsin as described in Materials and Methods. Tryptic fragments were separated by microbore HPLC, and each distinct peak was subjected to amino acid sequence analysis. For the identification of glycosylated peptides, aliquots from the fractions (asterisks) were separately analyzed for sugar constituents. Mox., oxidized methionine; RT, retention time.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Upper mass range of the MALDI-TOF spectrum of HPLC fraction 13 (compare Fig. 3) isolated by reverse-phase HPLC from OvGST1a following tryptic digestion. The peptide containing glycosylation site 1 (N50) (left site) bears truncated mannose type glycans with two to five mannose residues (M2 to M5), whereas the peptide with one missing cleavage site and containing glycosylation site 4 (N144) (right site) bears high-mannose glycans with five to eight mannose residues. From the dominant component at m/z 2841.7, a daughter ion spectrum was obtained by ESI-MS/MS as depicted in Fig. 5.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   ESI daughter ion spectrum of doubly charged GP1 with five mannose residues. The major doubly charged fragment ions are due to the elimination of one to five mannose residues. Complementary glycan fragments obtained by the cleavage of the chitobiose core and the subsequent loss of the mannose residues were obtained as indicated in the fragmentation scheme. Peptide-specific fragments incorporating the carboxy-terminal (yn) or amino-terminal (bn) amino acids are marked in the spectrum. GN, N-acetylglucosamine; M, mannose.

The helminth's surface and excreted or secreted antigens represent the major challenge to the host's immune system and may be a key to the successful defense strategies of the parasite. Immunodominant epitopes are often accessible to periodate oxidation and/or are susceptible to peptide N-glycosidase F digestion. Numerous lectin binding studies confirm the prevalence of saccharide determinants on the parasite surface. However, only a few helminth carbohydrates have actually been structurally defined (13, 37).

The oligomannosyl structures that we found for OvGST1a and -1b are common features in nematodes, as are truncated glycans with one or two additional mannoses attached to the chitobiose core (13). Structural analysis of N-glycans of whole-worm extract from the filarial parasite Acanthocheilonema viteae displays high levels of N-glycans that contain phosphorylcholine (PC). These PC-glycans are also found in glycoproteins that are secreted by adult filarial parasites during parasitism in their final host. The PC component has been shown to interfere with key signal transducers implicated in cellular activation and proliferation and represents a novel target for chemotherapy (12). The N-glycans usually have trimannosyl cores that have one to four N-acetylglucosamine residues added and that either were or were not fucosylated. Besides the PC-glycans, a second family of N-glycans that are remarkably rich in GlcNAc have been found in filarial nematodes (17). Furthermore, complex and hybrid structures are also major constituents. These may have antennae that are truncated to a single GlcNAc, as was observed for Dirofilaria immitis, or nontruncated antennae that commonly have a backbone composed of lacdiNAc (GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAc) (24).

Although there still is no specific identification of a particular helminth glycoconjugate in mediating a specific host response, glycoconjugates are being increasingly implicated in the immune responses to parasites. Here they can be key modulators or targets of the host immune systems, and often the immunodominant epitopes are glycans of unique structures (13).

Homology modeling of OvGST1. Alignment of OvGST1a and -1b with GSTs from various classes demonstrates the relationship to the sigma class enzymes, particularly the hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase from rats (23), one of the products of the GST gene families in the housefly Musca domestica that is involved in pesticide resistance (57), the S-crystallins constituting the major lens proteins in squids (54), and the GSTs isolated from squid digestive glands (19).

To analyze the localization of the N-glycans, a three-dimensional model of OvGST1a was prepared based on the X-ray crystallography data of the sigma class GST from squids (1GSQ) (Fig. 6). An alignment obtained with the program Blast2, version 2.1.1 (August 2000) indicates an overall similarity of 45%, a sequence identity of 25%, and only four gaps (2%). There are no large deviations from the empirical values; the OvGST1 model compares favorably with the structure of the squid GST. Due to the missing homology to the N-terminal extension, the model begins at position Q22. The overall topology of the OvGST1 monomer is similar to the typical GST structure and, as described for the squid sigma class GST, also is arranged in a smaller alpha /beta domain (domain I) and a larger alpha  domain (domain II). Domain I encompasses the first one-third of the enzyme and is built up in a beta alpha beta alpha beta beta alpha structural motif that forms a mixed four-strand beta  sheet in the order of 4-3-1-2, with strand 3 antiparallel to the other three sheets. The overall fold of domain I is classified as being part of the thioredoxin superfamily fold (4, 39) and contains the principal determinants for GSH binding. Domain II of the protein is composed of five alpha -helices (alpha 4 to alpha 8) (Fig. 6). While domain I is mainly responsible for GSH binding, domain II provides the primary structural elements associated with the second substrate specificity (49).


View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   N-glycosylation sites and the topology of the OvGST1a monomer. Shown is a ribbon presentation of a three dimensional model of OvGST1a based on the structure of the squid sigma class GST (PDB code: 1GSQ). alpha -Helices are red, and beta  strands are yellow. The N-to-C direction of the structural elements can be deduced by the labeling of the secondary structures. The locations of the N glycosylation sites are orange.

The other known OvGST with glutathione-binding capacity (OvGST2) shows a strong topological relationship with the pi class GSTs (34). However, in OvGST2, the C-terminal coil lies to one side of the active site. This coil normally forms the back face of the hydrophobic substrate binding pocket, and its displacement results in a "tunnel-like" hole (34). Direct comparison of the active sites of OvGST1 and OvGST2 shows that that of OvGST1 is more flattened, resulting in a wider and shallower cleft. This probably reflects the observed differences in the substrate specificities, with OvGST1 preferring bulky aromatic substrates.

The most striking difference between OvGST1 and other described GSTs is the N glycosylation. Four N-linked glycosylation sites were located at positions N50, N79, N134, and N144, corresponding to GP144-57, GP2 70-98, GP3134-137, and GP4144-156 of OvGST1a, respectively (Fig. 6). For OvGST1b an additional glycosylation site is located in the N-terminal extension (N6). Glycosylation site 1 (OvGST1b: glycosylation site 2) is found in a loop following alpha -helix 1, glycosylation site 2 (OvGST1b: glycosylation site 3) is located in the beta -sheet 3, and glycosylation site 3 (OvGST-1b: glycosylation site 4) lies in a loop made out of five amino acids between alpha -helix 4 and alpha -helix 5. Finally, glycosylation site 4 (OvGST1b: glycosylation site 5) is located in alpha -helix 5 near a small loop region made out of two residues (E147 and S148) (Fig. 6). This demonstrates that the N-glycans cover, more or less, the entire enzyme. An additional binding site for nonsubstrate ligands and their glutathione conjugates was observed in the region of the crystallographic twofold axis, incorporating the alpha 4-turn-alpha 5 motifs of the two subunits in the sigma class GST from squid digestive glands (20). In the 26-kDa GST from Schistosoma japonicum, a third binding site for the antischistosomal drug praziquantel has been found near the dimer interface (40). The binding regions of the nonsubstrate binding sites of OvGST1a and -1b appear to be shielded by the N-glycans of glycosylation site 3 (N134), as well as by the large carbohydrate moieties of glycosylation site 4 (N144).

No difference in the binding of the glycosylated enzymes and that of the deglycosylated enzymes to the immobilized glutathione was observed by affinity chromatography, indicating that the N-glycans do not interfere with the GSH-binding site. Furthermore, no variance in substrate conjugation capacity between the glycosylated and deglycosylated forms was observed, demonstrating that the N-glycans do not interfere with the active site and have no measurable influence on the enzymatic activity. Comparison of the conjugation capacity of the recombinant OvGST1a plus N-terminal extension and that of the shortened form (without N-terminal extension) using universal substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) shows no difference in the activities (data not shown). This, however, was expected, due to the topological distance between the active site and extension.

Influence of N glycosylation on the recognition of OvGST1a and -1b by patient sera. To analyze the influence of the partially truncated N-glycans on the recognition of OvGST1a and -1b by the immune system of the host, 29 sera of patients with generalized onchocerciasis were tested by ELISA (Fig. 7). For the deglycosylation, the native OvGST1a and -1b were treated with N-glycanase F (Fig. 1, lanes A and C). Deglycosylation was additionally performed using endoglycosidase H (Fig. 1, lane D). This experiment was necessary to analyze the influence of the altered charge due to the replacement of amino acid N with D, caused by treatment with N-glycosidase F. The IgG antibody response to endoglycosidase H-deglycosylated OvGST1a and -1b was similar to the antibody responses measured following N-glycosidase F treatment. Furthermore, comparative ELISA with native OvGST1a and -1b with and without reheating and overnight incubation at 37°C was performed to exclude the influence of this pretreatment in the following ELISA measurements. Serological responses to native glycosylated and deglycosylated OvGST1a and -1b are indicated in Fig. 7. Levels of OvGST1a- and -1b-specific antibodies of noninfected individuals were analyzed using five European and four African control sera. In these sera, there was no recognition of the glycosylated and deglycosylated forms. The OD450 cutoff of 0.18 can probably be attributed to conserved GST epitopes. The OD450 values representing the IgG antibody responses to the OvGSTs are significantly higher (paired test; P < 0.05) for the native glycosylated form, i.e., the native structure that is found in the living parasite (median OD450 = 0.66 [10th and 90th percentiles, 0.32 and 0.79, respectively]), than for the deglycosylated form (median OD450 = 0.36 [10th and 90th percentiles, 0.19 and 0.58]) (Fig. 7). Using E. coli-expressed rOv-GST1a instead of the deglycosylated protein also led to lower IgG responses than those for the native protein (data not shown). Out of the 29 onchocerciasis patient sera tested, 2 sera did not recognize the enzymes and 2 others recognized only the glycosylated form of the enzymes.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   ELISA of the IgG response of human onchocerciasis infection sera to native glycosylated and deglycosylated OvGST1s. Twenty-nine sera of patients infected with O. volvulus were tested (n = 3). The responses were significantly higher (P < 0.05) for the glycosylated form (OvGST1 plus CHO) than for the deglycosylated (OvGST1 without carbohydrates) protein. The IgG responses of the patient sera (OD450 values) are given as individual points. Boxes, 50% area of total IgG antibody responses to OvGST with and without CHO; bars,10th and 90th percentiles. The line marks the cutoff value.

Epitope mapping of the S. mansoni 28-kDa GST identified three major antigenic sites (3). An alignment of S. mansoni 28-kDa GST with OvGST1a reveals that three out of the four N-glycan sites are located directly in the antigenic regions. The high immunogenicity of the N-glycans of OvGST1 and their location in homologous sites of confirmed antigenic epitopes indicate that these epitopes are of importance for the antigenicity of OvGST1. These results indicate that posttranslational modifications of proteins clearly have an important influence with respect to their recognition by the host immune system.

Carbohydrates that are expressed by pathogens may incite several types of innate immune activation. When they are excretory-secretory antigens or are surface associated, they are recognized by antibodies or lymphocytes inducing various kinds of responses. They have been shown to bind to the serum mannose-binding lectin or to the mannose receptor on cells, facilitating complement binding and/or phagocytosis as part of the innate immune system (10, 51). Moreover it has been demonstrated that mannosylation of peptides enhances the potency to stimulate major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted T-cell clones, leading to selective targeting and superior presentation on dendritic cells (53). In addition, carbohydrates have the ability to activate the alternative pathway of complement. The ability of the carbohydrates on OvGST1a and -1b to induce or prime host T-cell responses is currently being investigated (A. Hoerauf et al., unpublished data).

Antibody recognition of the N-terminal extension of OvGST1a. When expressing the OvGST1a and -1b in E. coli, we get initiation of translation at two different methionines, resulting in the respective expression of proteins that differ in size. Whereas the 27-kDa protein has a 25-amino-acid N-terminal extension, the smaller protein does not (Fig. 2). This extension shows no homology to known GST structures. Searching the available databases did not result in any homologies to known peptide structures. By using the program ANTIGENIC (http://www.uk.embnet.org/Software/EMBOSS/) based on the method of Kolaskar and Tongaonkar (28, 44), we identified eight potential antigenic determinants in OvGST1a (A39-S52, I112-W129, G167-M184, A90-L102, L194-K206, F72-N79, S81-S88, and E147-F160) and one located in the N-terminal extension of the GST (K18-Q24). Based on this tentative information we analyzed the N-terminal extension of the GST in order to identify the antigenic potency of this OvGST1-specific region. To examine the antibody response to the N-terminal extension, 38 sera of patients with generalized onchocerciasis were tested by ELISA. For that purpose, the 27-kDa OvGST1a with N terminus (generated by mutating the second translation initiation start point from M25 to A25) was expressed and purified in order to preserve the conformational epitopes of the total protein. For comparison, we also expressed OvGST1a without the N terminus. Significantly higher antibody levels (P = 0.046) were found for OvGST1a plus the N terminus (median OD450 = 0.28 [10th and 90th percentiles, 0.16 and 0.58, respectively]) than for the N-terminally truncated protein (median OD450 = 0.22 [10th and 90th percentiles, 0.17 and 0.35, respectively]). Whereas four of the patient sera did not recognize the 27-kDa OvGST1a plus N-terminal extension, nine did not recognize the smaller 24.5-kDa protein. These results show that 34 out of 38 (89.5%) patient sera recognized the recombinant OvGST1a plus N-terminal extension as the antigen. From the patient sera that recognized both, i.e., the protein with and without the N-terminal extension, 22 out of 38 sera (58%) showed an enhanced reactivity to the protein with the N-terminal extension.

Reactivity of the N-terminal portion of OvGST1a with sera from patients with other helminth infections. All helminth GSTs have some distinct structural elements that lead to cross-reactivity with sera from patients infected with other helminths. For example, antibodies raised against affinity-purified OvGSTs react strongly with their Brugia pahangi and Brugia malayi counterparts (47). OvGST1a and -1b, however, each have a unique N-terminal extension not found in other GSTs so far. On account of the immunoreactivity observed, we synthesized two overlapping peptides comprising the N-terminal extension of OvGST1a and analyzed their cross-reactive properties with sera from patients infected with other helminths (L. loa, B. malayi, W. bancrofti, A. lumbricoides, T. spiralis, and S. mansoni). All of the tested sera showed low IgG responses, with OD450 values <= 0.15. Twelve out of 20 sera from patients with onchocerciasis showed IgG antibody responses to the N-terminal extension of OvGST1a, with OD450 values >0.1, and 8 of these sera reacted weakly with the two peptides (median OD450 = 0.2 [10th and 90th percentiles, 0.052 and 0.86, respectively]; cutoff OD450 = 0.04). None of the sera (serum pools) from patients with filarial infections with L. loa or B. malayi exceeded OD450 values of >0.1. Two of five serum pools from patients infected with closely related filarial nematode W. bancrofti showed an IgG response to the peptides (OD450 values of >0.1). This higher IgG reaction may be due to similar GST antigen epitopes, which might resemble the N-terminal portion of OvGST1a. As shown for the lymphatic filariasis-causing nematode B. malayi, three GSTs similar to OvGST1 and OvGST2 cross-react with anti-OvGST rabbit antisera, indicating that B. malayi possesses similar GSTs (47). The investigation of serum pools that were obtained from patients with non-filarial nematode infections demonstrates that all four pools from T. spiralis infections showed IgG responses <0.1 while one of five pools from A. lumbricoides-infected patients showed a higher IgG reaction (OD450 = 0.12) with the N-terminal extension of OvGST1a. This may be due to a hidden or former infection with O. volvulus. The serum pools from patients infected with the trematode S. mansoni did not react with the N-terminal extension peptides (OD450 values of <0.1).

There is a need to expand our knowledge of the diversity and structure of N-glycans in filarial parasites. Carbohydrate antigens of the parasite are targets of humoral immunity and may play a role in modulating host immune responses. They may provide protective immunity against infection. Furthermore, carbohydrates might play an important role in mediating specific parasite defense or survival strategies by protecting extracellular proteins from proteolytic degradation or by suppressing certain immune responses, host lectin binding, and cell targeting. In the vertebrate host, glycoproteins are recognized by antibodies, mannose-binding proteins, and cellular mannose receptors. This recognition, in turn, represents an effective defense mechanism leading to complement fixation, opsonization, and activation of specific T- and B-cell responses against the parasite. Better understanding of these glycans and the immunity to them might have important implications for the design of immunization protocols in order to induce or enhance protective cell-mediated and humoral immunity in humans. A comparative study of glycosylated and nonglycosylated secretory 20-kDa retinol binding proteins from O. volvulus (Ov20), B. malayi (Bm20), and A. viteae (Av20) revealed three N-linked glycosylation sites for Ov20 and Av20 and one different site for Bm20, which may reflect functional differences (43). Ov20 and Av20, in contrast to Bm20, were strongly recognized by sera from patients with onchocerciasis but not from patients with lymphatic filariasis. The different glycosylation that was observed in the three different glycoproteins was discussed as being a contribution to the differential immunological reactivities found (43).

The analysis of proteins in their native state has become a prerequisite for a variety of functional and structural studies, including vaccine development. In the nematocidal vaccines tested so far, the E. coli-expressed candidate vaccine antigens confer substantially less protection than their native purified counterparts or no protection (27). The structure and immunological properties of the E. coli-expressed antigens differ from those of native worm antigens. The different structures, caused by the missing eucaryotic modifications, result in immune responses which are inefficient for killing the worm. This demonstrates the importance of analyzing posttranslational modifications, such as glycosylation of immunodominant antigens.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This project is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG projects Li793-1-4). P. Fischer was supported by the scholarship program "Infectiology" of the BMBF.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht-Str. 74, 20359 Hamburg, Germany. Phone: 49-40-42818-415. Fax: 49-40-42818-418. E-mail: liebau{at}bni.uni-hamburg.de.

Editor:   S. H. E. Kaufmann


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References

1. Adam, R., B. Kaltmann, W. Rudin, T. Friedrich, T. Marti, and R. Lucius. 1996. Identification of chitinase as the immunodominant filarial antigen recognised by sera of vaccinated rodents. J. Biol. Chem. 271:1441-1447[Abstract/Free Full Text].
2. Albiez, E. J., D. W. Büttner, and B. O. L. Duke. 1988. Diagnosis and extirpation of nodules in human onchocerciasis. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 39:331-346.
3. Auriault, C., H. Gras-Masse, I. Wolowczuk, R. J. Pierce, J.-M. Balloul, J.-L. Neyrinck, H. Drobecq, A. Tartar, and A. Capron. 1988. Analysis of T and B cell epitopes of the Schistosoma mansoni P28 antigen in the rat model by using synthetic peptides. J. Immunol. 141:1678-1694[Abstract].
4. Babbitt, P. C. 2000. Reengineering the glutathione S-transferase scaffold: a rational design strategy pays off. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10298-10300[Free Full Text].
5. Brattig, N., C. Nietz, S. Hounkpatin, R. Lucius, F. Seeber, U. Pichlmeier, and T. Pogonka. 1997. Differences in cytokine responses to Onchocerca volvulus extract and recombinant Ov33 and OvL3-1 proteins in exposed subjects with various parasitologic and clinical states. J. Infect. Dis. 176:838-842[Medline].
6. Brattig, N. W., I. Krawietz, A. Z. Abakar, K. D. Erttmann, T. F. Kruppa, and A. Massougbodji. 1994. Strong IgG isotypic antibody response in sowdah type onchocerciasis. J. Infect. Dis. 170:955-961[Medline].
7. Brooks, B. R., R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus. 1983. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculation. J. Comp. Chem. 4:187-217.
8. Brophy, P. M., and D. I. Pritchard. 1994. Parasitic helminth glutathione S-transferases: an update on their potential as targets for immuno- and chemotherapy. Exp. Parasitol. 79:89-96[CrossRef][Medline].
9. Brophy, P. M., A. M. Campbell, A. J. van Eldik, P. H. Teesdale-Spittle, E. Liebau, and M. F. Wang. 2000. Beta-carbonyl substituted glutathione conjugates as inhibitors of O. volvulus GST2. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10:979-981[CrossRef][Medline].
10. Carroll, M. C., and A. P. Prodeus. 1998. Linkages of innate and adaptive immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10:36-40[CrossRef][Medline].
11. Catmull, J., M. E. Wilson, L. V. Kirchhoff, A. Metwali, and J. E. Donelson. 1999. Induction of specific cell-mediated immunity in mice by oral immunization with Salmonella expressing Onchocerca volvulus glutathione S-transferase. Vaccine 17:31-39[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Deehan, M. R., M. J. Frame, R. M. Parkhouse, S. D. Seatter, S. D. Reid, M. M. Harnett, and W. Harnett. 1998. A phosphorylcholine-containing filarial nematode-secreted product disrupts B lymphocyte activation by targeting key proliferative signaling pathways. J. Immunol. 160:2692-2699[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Dell, A., S. M. Haslam, H. R. Morris, and K. H. Khoo. 1999. Immunogenic glycoconjugates implicated in parasitic nematode diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1455:353-362[Medline].
14. Eaton, D. L., and T. K. Bammler. 1999. Concise review of the glutathione S-transferases and their significance to toxicology. Toxicol. Sci. 49:156-164[Free Full Text].
15. Grabenhorst, E., A. Hoffmann, M. Nimtz, G. Zettlmeissl, and H. S. Conradt. 1995. Construction of stable BHK-21 cells coexpressing human secretory glycoproteins and human Gal(beta 1-4)GlcNAc-R alpha 2,6-sialyltransferase alpha 2,6-linked NeuAc is preferentially attached to the Gal(beta 1-4)GlcNAc(beta 1-2)Man(alpha 1-3)-branch of diantennary oligosaccharides from secreted recombinant beta-trace protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 232:718-725[Medline].
16. Hall, A. G. 1999. Glutathione and the regulation of cell death. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 457:199-203[Medline].
17. Haslam, S. M., K. M. Houston, W. Harnett, A. J. Reason, H. R. Morris, and A. Dell. 1999. Structural studies of N-glycans of filarial parasites. Conservation of phosphorylcholine-substituted glycans among species and discovery of novel chito-oligomers. J. Biol. Chem. 274:20953-20960[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Jenkins, R. E., M. J. Taylor, N. J. Gilvary, and A. E. Bianco. 1998. Tropomyosin implicated in host protective responses to microfilariae in onchocerciasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:7550-7555[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Ji, X., E. C. von Rosenvinge, W. W. Johnson, S. I. Tomarev, J. Piatigorsky, R. N. Armstrong, and G. L. Gilliland. 1995. Three-dimensional structure, catalytic properties, and evolution of a sigma class glutathione transferase from squid, a progenitor of the lens S-crystallins of cephalopods. Biochemistry 34:5317-5328[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Ji, X., E. C. von Rosenvinge, W. W. Johnson, R. N. Armstrong, and G. L. Gilliland. 1996. Location of a potential transport binding site in a sigma class glutathione transferase by x-ray crystallography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8208-8213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Joseph, G. T., T. Huima, and S. Lustigmann. 1998. Characterization of an Onchocerca volvulus L3-specific larval antigen, Ov-ALT-1. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 96:177-183[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Kale, O. 1998. Onchocerciasis: the burden of disease. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 92:101-115[CrossRef].
23. Kanaoka, Y., H. Ago, E. Inagaki, T. Nanayama, M. Miyano, R. Kikuno, Y. Fujii, N. Eguchi, H. Toh, Y. Urade, and O. Hayaishi. 1997. Cloning and crystal structure of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase. Cell 90:1085-1095[CrossRef][Medline].
24. Kang, S., R. D. Cummings, and J. W. McCall. 1993. Characterization of the N-linked oligosaccharides in glycoproteins synthesized by microfilariae of Dirofilaria immitis. J. Parasitol. 79:815-828[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Ketterer, B. 1988. Protective role of glutathione and glutathione transferases in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Mut. Res. 202:343-361[Medline].
26. Ketterer, B. 1998. Glutathione S-transferases and prevention of cellular free radical damage. Free Radic. Res. 28:647-658[Medline].
27. Knox, D. P. 2000. Development of vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes. Parasitology 120:43-61[CrossRef].
28. Kolaskar, A. S., and P. C. Tongaonkar. 1990. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett. 276:172-174[CrossRef][Medline].
29. Laskowski, R. A., M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton. 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283-291[CrossRef].
30. Li, B. W., R. Chandrashekar, and G. J. Weil. 1993. Vaccination with recombinant filarial paramyosin induces partial immunity to Brugia malayi infection in jirds. J. Immunol. 150:1881-1885[Abstract].
31. Liebau, E., G. Wildenburg, R. D. Walter, and K. Henkle-Dührsen. 1994. A novel type of glutathione S-transferase in Onchocerca volvulus. Infect. Immun. 62:4762-4767[Abstract/Free Full Text].
32. Liebau, E., R. D. Walter, and K. Henkle-Dührsen. 1994. Isolation, sequence and expression of an Onchocerca volvulus glutathione S-transferase cDNA. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 63:305-309[CrossRef][Medline].
33. Liebau, E., O. L. Schönberger, R. D. Walter, and K. J. Henkle-Dührsen. 1994. Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding glutathione S-transferase from Ascaris suum. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 63:167-170[CrossRef][Medline].
34. Liebau, E., G. Wildenburg, P. M. Brophy, R. D. Walter, and K. Henkle-Dührsen. 1996. Biochemical analysis, gene structure and localization of the 24 kDa glutathione S-transferase from Onchocerca volvulus. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 80:27-39[CrossRef][Medline].
35. Liebau, E., M. L. Eschbach, W. Tawe, A. Sommer, P. Fischer, R. D. Walter, and K. Henkle-Dührsen. 2000. Identification of a stress-responsive Onchocerca volvulus glutathione S-transferase (Ov-GST-3) by RT-PCR differential display. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 109:101-110[CrossRef][Medline].
36. Lightowlers, M. W., and M. D. Rickard. 1988. Excretory-secretory products of helminth parasites: effects on host immune responses. Parasitology 96:123-166.
37. Maizels, R. M., M. L. Blaxter, and M. E. Selkirk. 1993. Forms and functions of nematode surfaces. Exp. Parasitol. 77:380-384[CrossRef][Medline].
38. Maizels, R. M., M. J. Holland, F. H. Falcone, X. X. Zang, and M. Yazdanbakhsh. 1999. Vaccination against helminth parasites---the ultimate challenge for vaccinologists? Immunol. Rev. 171:125-147[CrossRef][Medline].
39. Mannervik, B., A. D. Cameron, E. Fernandez, A. Gustafsson, L. O. Hansson, P. Jemth, F. Jiang, T. A. Jones, A. K. Larsson, L. O. Nilsson, B. Olin, P. L. Pettersson, M. Ridderström, G. Stenberg, and M. Widersten. 1998. An evolutionary approach to the design of glutathione-linked enzymes. Chem. Biol. Interact. 111-112:15-21.
40. McTigue, L. A., D. R. Williams, and J. A. Tainer. 1995. Crystal structures of a schistosomal drug and vaccine target: glutathione S-transferase from Schistosoma japonica and its complex with the leading antischistosomal drug praziquantel. J. Mol. Biol. 246:21-27[CrossRef][Medline].
41. Meritt, E. A., and E. P. M. Murphy. 1994. Raster 3D version 2.0, a program for photorealistic molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. 50:869-873[CrossRef].
42. Meyer, D. J., R. Muimo, M. Thomas, D. Coates, and R. E. Isaac. 1996. Purification and characterization of prostaglandin-H E-isomerase, a sigma-class glutathione S-transferase, from Ascaridia galli. Biochem. J. 313:223-227.
43. Nirmalan, N., N. J. V. Cordeiro, S. L. Kläger, J. E. Bradley, and J. E. Allen. 1999. Comparative analysis of glycosylated and nonglycosylated filarial homologues of the 20-kilodalton retinol binding protein from Onchocerca volvulus (Ov20). Infect. Immun. 67:6329-6334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
44. Parker, J. M. R., D. Guo, and R. S. Hodges. 1986. New hydrophobilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 25:5425-5432[CrossRef][Medline].
45. Perlman, D. A., D. A. Case, J. W. Caldwell, W. S. Ross, T. E. Cheatham III, S. DeBold, D. Ferguson, G. Seibel, and P. Kollmann. 1995. AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structure and energetic properties of molecules. Comp. Phys. Commun. 91:1-41.
46. Ponder, J. W., and F. M. Richards. 1987. An efficient newton-like method for molecular mechanics energy minimization of large molecules. J. Comp. Chem. 8:1016-1024[CrossRef].
47. Rao, U. R., G. Salinas, K. Mehta, and T. R. Klei. 2000. Identification and localization of glutathione S-transferase as a potential target enzyme in Brugia species. Parasitol. Res. 86:908-915[CrossRef][Medline].
48. Sali, A., and T. L. Blundell. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779-815[CrossRef][Medline].
49. Salinas, A. E., and M. G. Wong. 1999. Glutathione S-transferase---a review. Curr. Med. Chem. 6:279-309[Medline].
50. Schröter, S., P. Derr, H. S. Conradt, M. Nimtz, G. Hale, and C. Kirchhoff. 1999. Male-specific modification of human CD52. J. Biol. Chem. 274:29862-29873[Abstract/Free Full Text].
51. Stahl, P. D., and R. A. Ezekowitz. 1998. The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10:50-55[CrossRef][Medline].
52. Strange, R. C., P. W. Jones, and A. A. Fryer. 2000. Glutathione S-transferase: genetics and role in toxicology. Toxicol. Lett. 15:357-363.
53. Tan, M. C. A. A., A. M. Mommaas, J. W. Drijfhout, R. Jordens, J. J. M. Onderwater, D. Verwoerd, A. A. Mulder, A. N. van der Heiden, D. Scheidegger, L. C. J. M. Oomen, T. H. M. Ottenhoff, A. Tulp, J. J. Neefjes, and F. Koning. 1997. Mannose receptor-mediated uptake of antigens strongly enhances HLA class II-restricted antigen presentation by cultured dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 27:2426-2435[Medline].
54. Tomarev, S. I., R. D. Zinovieva, and J. Piatigorsky. 1992. Characterization of squid crystallin genes. Comparison with mammalian glutathione S-transferase genes. J. Biol. Chem. 267:8604-8612[Abstract/Free Full Text].
55. Whalen, R., and T. D. Boyer. 1998. Human glutathione S-transferases. Semin. Liver Dis. 18:345-358[Medline].
56. Wilce, M. C. J., and M. W. Parker. 1994. Structure and function of glutathione S-transferases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1205:1-18[CrossRef][Medline].
57. Zhou, Z. H., and M. Syvanen. 1997. A complex glutathione transferase gene family in the housefly Musca domestica. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:187-194[CrossRef][Medline].


Infection and Immunity, December 2001, p. 7718-7728, Vol. 69, No. 12
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7718-7728.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Perbandt, M., Hoppner, J., Betzel, C., Walter, R. D., Liebau, E. (2005). Structure of the Major Cytosolic Glutathione S-Transferase from the Parasitic Nematode Onchocerca volvulus. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 12630-12636 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brattig, N. W., Bazzocchi, C., Kirschning, C. J., Reiling, N., Buttner, D. W., Ceciliani, F., Geisinger, F., Hochrein, H., Ernst, M., Wagner, H., Bandi, C., Hoerauf, A. (2004). The Major Surface Protein of Wolbachia Endosymbionts in Filarial Nematodes Elicits Immune Responses through TLR2 and TLR4. J. Immunol. 173: 437-445 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sommer, A., Rickert, R., Fischer, P., Steinhart, H., Walter, R. D., Liebau, E. (2003). A Dominant Role for Extracellular Glutathione S-Transferase from Onchocerca volvulus Is the Production of Prostaglandin D2. Infect. Immun. 71: 3603-3606 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Liebau, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Liebau, E.