Previous Article | Next Article 
Infection and Immunity, December 2001, p. 7866-7872, Vol. 69, No. 12
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7866-7872.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
How Giardia Swim and Divide
Sudip
Ghosh,1
Marta
Frisardi,1
Rick
Rogers,2 and
John
Samuelson1,*
Department of Immunology and Infectious
Diseases1 and the BioMedical Imaging
Institute,2 Harvard School of Public Health,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received 14 November 2000/Returned for modification 20 December
2000/Accepted 25 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
To determine how binuclear giardia swim, we used video microscopy
to observe trophozoites of Giardia intestinalis, which were labeled with an amino-specific Alexa Fluor dye that highlighted the flagella and adherence disc. Giardia swam forward by means of the
synchronous beating of anterior, posterolateral, and ventral flagella
in the plane of the ventral disc, while caudal flagella swam in a plane
perpendicular to the disc. Giardia turned in the plane of the disc by
means of a rudder-like motion of its tail, which was constant rather
than beating. To determine how giardia divide, we used
three-dimensional confocal microscopy, the same surface label, nuclear
stains, and antitubulin antibodies. Giardia divided with mirror-image
symmetry in the plane of the adherence disc, so that the right nucleus
of the mother became the left nucleus of the daughter. Pairs of nuclei
were tethered together by microtubules which surrounded nuclei and
prevented mother or daughter giardia from receiving two copies of the
same nucleus. New adherence discs formed upon a spiral backbone of
microtubules, which had a clockwise rotation when viewed from the
ventral surface. These dynamic observations of the parasite begin to
reveal how giardia swim and divide.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Giardia intestinalis
(also known as Giardia lamblia), which was likely first
visualized by von Leeuwenhoek, is a protist that causes intestinal
malabsorption and diarrhea (3, 21). Although giardia cause
an unattractive disease, they are among the most beautiful organisms,
as shown by scanning and transmission microscopy (4, 7,
10). Trophozoites of G. intestinalis have two
similar-appearing nuclei, which are both transcriptionally active
(13). The giardia nuclei are bilaterally symmetric, as are
four other microtubule-associated structures: the ventral adherence
disc, four pairs of flagella, the median body, and the funis (2,
7, 10). The ventral disc, by which giardia adhere to the surface
of intestinal epithelial cells, is composed of
- and
-tubulin and
at least three different unique cytoskeletal proteins called giardins
(2, 12, 17, 18, 20). Giardia have four pairs of flagella
(anterior, posterolateral, ventral, and caudal), which are composed of
microtubules in a 9-plus-2 arrangement (7, 10). All four
pairs of flagella originate from basal bodies, composed of microtubule
triplets, which are located between the two nuclei and are dorsal to
the adherence disc. The funis is a set of single microtubules, which run parallel to the caudal flagella from the disc to the tip of the
tail (2). The median body, which is a bundle of
microtubules bound by a unique protein called the median body protein,
is perpendicular to the funis and caudal to the adherence disc
(15).
Holberton (10) used phase microscopy to show that the
ventral flagella of adherent giardia were constantly beating in a synchronized manner in the plane of the adherence disc. Electron micrographs of adhering giardia to mouse intestines suggested that
parasites were drawing the intestinal villi up to the adherence disc.
Holberton proposed that the motion of the ventral flagella creates a
vacuum under the disc that sucks the intestinal epithelium to the
giardia (11). It is likely that lectins on the surface of
giardia also bind sugars on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells
(5). Because of the limits of phase microscopy, Holberton was unable to determine the motion of the ventral flagella when giardia
swim or divide and was unable to determine the motion of the anterior,
posterolateral, and caudal flagella. Here we used video microscopy and
amino-specific Alexa Fluor dyes, which were recently used to
demonstrate the motion of bacterial flagella (23), to
determine the motion of each pair of flagella of adherent and swimming giardia.
As giardia are motile and nonadherent when they divide, little is known
about how the organisms replicate themselves. For example, early
investigators thought that mother and daughter giardia divide along a
sagittal plane, so that the mother got two identical copies of one
nucleus while the daughter got two identical copies of the other
nucleus (6). Others suggested that the daughter giardia
slid off the back of the mother, so that the left nuclei of mother and
daughter giardia were the same (when viewed from the dorsal surface)
and that the right nuclei were the same (13). In contrast,
our results here suggest that giardia divide with mirror-image symmetry
in the plane of the adherence disc, so that the left nucleus of the
mother becomes the right nucleus of the daughter. Further, we used
antitubulin antibodies to identify perinuclear tethers, which bind
pairs of nuclei together during cell division.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Labeling surface of giardia.
The WB strain of G. intestinalis was grown axenically at 37°C in TYI-S-33
medium supplemented with bile salts (14). Dividing parasites, which are motile and nonadherent, were collected by removing
the supernatant of unchilled cultures. Nondividing giardia, which are
adherent to the plastic culture flask in logarithmic-phase cultures,
were collected by adding ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH
7, to the remaining parasites. For studies of giardia cysts, organisms
were incubated in encystation medium for 24 h, as described earlier in
reference 9. Cysts were recognized by their characteristic
ovalness, the absence of flagella, and the presence of four nuclei.
Giardia were washed in PBS; placed in 100 µl of PBS, pH 8.5, to
maximize the number of deproteinated amino groups on their surface; and
incubated for 1 h at 37°C with 0.25 mg of Alexa Fluor 488 or
Alexa Fluor 584 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.). Alexa Fluor dyes are
carboxylic acid succinimidyl esters, which react with deproteinated
amino groups (23). Alexa Fluor 488, which fluoresces like
fluorescein, was predominantly used for confocal microscopy studies.
Alexa Fluor 584, which fluoresces like Texas red, was predominantly
used for video microscopy, because it tended to bleach less. After
labeling, giardia were washed in PBS four times and were then
returned to complete culture medium.
Video microscopy.
Surface-labeled giardia were observed with
a Nikon Eclipse TE 300 inverted-fluorescence microscope, to which was
attached a Hamamatsu digital video camera, a Lambda 10-2 controller
(Sutter), and a MetaMorph (Universal Imaging) shutter and image
analysis system. Digital recordings were made of swimming giardia using 60× or 100× objectives and the streaming mode, which captured ~20
images per s. The zoom feature was used to focus and enlarge individual
giardia, while individual frames were examined to determine the motion
of each pair of flagella. Dozens of hours of observations and
recordings were distilled into the video micrographs shown (see Fig. 2
and 3).
Labeling cytoskeleton and nuclei of giardia.
WB giardia,
some of which were labeled on their surface with Alexa Fluor 488, were
fixed in 2% formaldehyde at 4°C for 10 min, washed in PBS, and
permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 to 2 min. To highlight
different structures in dividing giardia, parasites were stained with
three different antibodies to
-tubulin. Some giardia were incubated
for 1 h at 37°C with a mouse monoclonal antibody to bovine
-tubulin (Molecular Probes), which was diluted 1:100 in PBS with 2 mg of bovine serum albumin/ml. The giardia were washed four times in
PBS and were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a
rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody. Alternatively, some
giardia were incubated with a polyclonal rabbit antibody to
-tubulin
(Sigma), diluted 1:100, which was detected with a Texas red-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit antibody (20). Finally, some giardia were
incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti-
-tubulin antibody, diluted
1:100, which was also detected with a rhodamine-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit antibody. In addition, some giardia were incubated with 1 µg of propidium iodide or Sytox green per ml to label the nuclei.
Three-dimensional confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Immunolabeled giardia were placed in mounting media, coverslipped, and
examined using a Leica TCS NT confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica
Inc., Exton, Pa.). A band-pass (530 + 30 nm) filter was used to
select light emitted from the nucleus-specific probe (Sytox
green), and a long-pass 590-nm filter was used to detect the rhodamine-
and Texas red-conjugated antibodies under multiple-channel fluorescent
mode. Serial sections were collected from the apical surfaces of
giardia with step increments of 0.5 to 1 µm in the z axis.
Three-dimensional reconstructions which simultaneously showed features
on the inside and outside of giardia were created using VoxelView
(Vital Images, Fairfield, Iowa). Projections were electronically
repositioned to view the opposite side of these organisms.
Scanning electron microscopy.
Giardia were fixed in 2%
glutaraldehyde in PBS, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in
a graded ethanol series to absolute followed by hexamethyldisilazine,
and vacuum desiccated. Dry specimens were gold sputtered and imaged
using an XL30 ESEM-FEG (Fei Co., Hillsborough, Oreg.).
FISH.
WB parasites transfected with a pGEM-based plasmid
(p5n-Pac), which contains a bacterial
puromycin-N-acetyltransferase gene under a short G. intestinalis promoter, were a generous gift from Steven Singer of
Georgetown University (19). Transfected WB, which had been
cloned once by limiting dilution, was recloned on soft agar, as
described earlier (8), and was maintained in 100 µM
puromycin. For fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), giardia,
which were adherent to poly-Lys-coated slides by means of the ventral
disc, were swollen in 70 mM KCl, fixed in 3:1 methanol:acetic acid, and
denatured with 70% formamide at 70°C (16). Slide
contents were incubated overnight with biotin-labeled pGEM (20 µg/ml)
in 50% formamide and 2× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M
sodium citrate) at 37°C and were washed in 2× SSC and in phosphate
buffer plus detergent (PDB; Oncor). Biotin-labeled probes were detected with fluorescein isothiocyanate-avidin and were amplified with antiavidin antibody and a second incubation with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-avidin. Parasites were treated with RNase and
counterstained with propidium iodide. Slides were examined with a
Cytovision imaging system, which is designed for FISH, or a
Leica confocal microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Anatomy of giardia labeled on surface with amino-specific
Alexa Fluor dyes.
Alexa fluor dyes, which have recently been used
to study the motion of bacterial flagella during running and tumbling
(23), highlighted four pairs of giardia flagella with no
apparent effect on viability or cell division (Fig.
1A). The relationship between surface
labels and underlying cytoskeletal structures was shown by
three-dimensional confocal microscopy (Fig. 1B). Anterior flagella cross the midline, exit the cytoplasm at the lateral borders of the
adherence disc, and extend 8 µm. Ventral flagella, which look thicker
than the other flagella, exit the cytoplasm at the posterior border of
the disc and extend 12 µm. Posterolateral flagella, which are
contained within the caudal cytoplasm for about half their length, exit
at the side of the tail and extend 8 µm. Caudal flagella, which are
for the most part contained within the cytoplasm, exit at the end of
the tail and extend just 4 µm.

View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Important cytoskeletal structures of nondividing
Giardia trophozoites demonstrated by video microscopy (A) or
confocal microscopy (B). (A) Ventral view of a giardia labeled green on
its surface with Alexa Fluor 488, with highlighted anterior (A),
posterolateral (P), caudal (C), and ventral (V) flagella. (B) A
three-dimensional confocal micrograph of the ventral surface of another
giardia. Its surface was labeled green with Alexa Fluor 488, the nuclei
(N) were stained red with propidium iodide, and the median body (MB)
was stained red with monoclonal antibodies to bovine tubulin.
Bar, 2 µm.
|
|
Anterior, posterolateral, and ventral flagella of giardia beat with
a similar frequency in the plane of the adherence disc.
Giardia
prefer to adhere to a surface rather than swim freely in the medium.
For the most part, anterior, posterolateral, and caudal flagella of
adherent giardia were still (Fig. 2A and 2B). In contrast, the ventral flagella of
adherent giardia were constantly beating together in the plane of the
adherence disc. The waveform of the flagellar beating was bilaterally
symmetric and advanced from the caudal edge of the adherence disc to
the tips of the flagella. The waveform had an amplitude of 1.7 µm, a
wavelength of 5.8 µm, and a frequency of 5 to 10 beats/s, depending upon the temperature of the medium and the freshness of the parasite preparation. When giardia swam in the direction of the adherence disc,
ventral flagella moved with the same bilaterally symmetric, pseudosinusoidal waveform as that of adherent giardia (Fig. 2C). Posterolateral flagella beat in the plane of the adherence disc with a
frequency and wavelength similar to those of ventral flagella, but the
amplitude was smaller (1.1 µm) (Fig. 2B). The anterior flagella beat
in nearly the same plane and with the same frequency as ventral and
posterior flagella, but the bending of the anterior flagella was
asymmetric (Fig. 2C). Movies of swimming giardia are available for
viewing at
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/physiology /projects/bilavi/.

View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Videos of adherent and swimming giardia, each of which
was labeled on its surface with Alexa Fluor 584. (A) Ventral flagella
of an adherent giardia moved with a series of bends, which originated
where the ventral flagella exited the cytosol (black dot) and
propagated to the tip (drawing at right of row A). In contrast, the
anterior, posterolateral, and caudal flagella of this adherent giardia
were still. (B) The posterolateral flagellum of a second adherent
giardia moved with a series of bends which originated where the
posterolateral flagella exited the cytosol (black dot) and propagated
to the tip (drawing at right of row B). The beat of the posterolateral
flagella had the same frequency and wavelength but less amplitude than
that of the ventral flagella. (C) An anterior flagellum of a swimming
giardia moved with a single bend of low amplitude (drawing at
right of row C), which originated where the anterior flagellum exited
the adherence disc (black dot). More subtly, the beating motion of the
caudal flagella in a plane perpendicular to the adherence disc caused
the tails of swimming giardia to go in and out of focus. In contrast,
the wavelike bending of the caudal flagella (drawings in rows D and E)
was easier to see when swimming (D) or dividing (E) giardia were viewed
in profile. The bending of the caudal flagella begins within the
cytosol of the tail (black dots in rows D and E). (F) The tail of a
turning giardia remained curved in the direction of the turn, like the
rudder on a boat. Bars in the drawing at the right of row F indicate
direction of the caudal flagella. Each set of videos was composed of
consecutive frames shot at 20 frames per s. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
Two motions (beating and turning) of tails of swimming
giardia.
For the most part, the tail of adherent giardia was
still, with the distal tips of the caudal flagella projecting like two short antennae (Fig. 1A and B). In contrast, the tail of swimming giardia beat in the plane perpendicular to the adherence disc with the
same frequency as the beating of ventral, anterior, and posterolateral
flagella. When swimming giardia were viewed from the dorsal or ventral
surfaces, their tails moved in and out of the plane of focus (Fig. 2C).
In contrast, when swimming or dividing giardia were seen in profile,
their tails moved up and down (Fig. 2D and E, respectively). Giardia
swam straight in the plane of the adherence disc (Fig. 2C) and/or
rotated clockwise or counterclockwise along their long axis (Fig. 3A
and B). Alternatively, giardia turned in
the plane of the adherence disc by curving their tails like the rudder
of a boat (Fig. 2F). When giardia turned, the caudal flagella, which
were not beating, were parallel to each other. Giardia maintained their
curved shape for a number of seconds, so that the parasites turned in
multiple circles.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Videos of rotating giardia, each of which was labeled on
its surface with Alexa Fluor 584. (A) Head-on view of a giardia
rotating clockwise around its axis at ~3 revolutions per s. (B) Side
view of another giardia rotating around its long axis at ~3
revolution per s. Each set of videos was composed of consecutive frames
shot at 20 frames per s. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
Giardia replicate with mirror-image symmetry in plane of adherence
disc.
Dividing giardia had a mirror-image symmetry in the plane of
the disc, so that it was impossible to distinguish the mother from the
daughter. Mirror-image symmetry was present whether discs faced toward,
away, or in the same plane as the others (Fig. 4A to
C). Giardia also showed mirror-image
symmetry when the cytoskeleton rather than the surface was visualized
with antibodies to acetylated tubulin (Fig. 4D). A prediction of the
mirror-image symmetry hypothesis is that the left nucleus of the mother
should become the right nucleus of the daughter giardia. This was shown
by introducing a foreign episome into a single nucleus of transfected
giardia and localizing the episome using FISH (16, 19). A
quadrinucleate, mitotic organism had episomal plasmids in the right
nucleus of one pair of nuclei and the left nucleus of the other pair of
nuclei (Fig. 5A). The episome-associated
nucleus could be either left or right when viewed from the dorsal
surface of giardia, which adhered to poly-Lys-coated slides prior to
fixation (Fig. 5B). The ~50:50 mixture of left- and right-labeled
nuclei was maintained after transfected WB was recloned on soft
agar (8). A summary of the FISH results is shown in Fig.
5C.

View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Bilateral symmetry of dividing giardia, labeled on their
surface with Alexa Fluor 488 (A to C) and viewed with three-dimensional
confocal microscopy. (A) Dividing giardia, which were also labeled with
monoclonal anti-bovine -tubulin antibodies to demonstrate the median
body (red), were bilaterally symmetric with incompletely formed discs
facing each other. Two other giardia, the nuclei of which were labeled
red with propidium iodide, were bilaterally symmetric with discs facing
away from each other (B) or in a plane (C). Bilateral symmetry was also
present in dividing giardia labeled with Sytox green and antibodies to
acetylated tubulin (red) (D). Bars, 2 µm.
|
|

View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
FISH with a probe to a foreign plasmid in transfected
giardia. (A) Fluorescence micrograph of a quadrinucleate, dividing
giardia which has plasmids (yellow) on the right side of one pair of
nuclei and on the left side of the other pair. (B) Confocal micrographs
of transfected and cloned giardia, which show that the episomal
plasmids (yellow) are present in just one nucleus, which may be left
and right. Bars, 2 µm. (C) Cartoon shows that giardia divide with
mirror-image symmetry, so that episomal plasmids in the right nucleus
of the mother are present in the left nucleus of the daughter.
|
|
Pairs of nuclei are tethered together when giardia replicate.
Nuclei of nondividing giardia were surrounded by perinuclear tethers,
which were composed of microtubules that were highlighted by a
polyclonal rabbit anti-
-tubulin antibody (Fig. 6A to
C). Microtubules within the perinuclear
tethers did not appear to be acetylated, because they were poorly
visualized with antibodies to acetylated tubulin (Fig. 4D and 7B and C)
(20). During cell division, both pairs of nuclei were
surrounded by perinuclear tethers of microtubules (Fig. 6D). These
perinuclear tethers also surrounded the nuclei of giardia cysts (Fig.
6E). Three-dimensional reconstructions of confocal images suggested
that perinuclear tethers were developed from a set of microtubules,
which ran along the central axis of giardia (Fig. 6F).

View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Three-dimensional confocal micrographs highlighting
microtubules which form perinuclear tethers. (A to C) Micrographs of a
giardia which was stained with polyclonal antibodies to -tubulin
(red in panels A and C) and Sytox green (green in panel B and yellow in
panel C) show tethers of microtubules (arrows) that surround both
nuclei. A dividing giardia (D) and an encysted giardia (E) stained with
the same antitubulin antibodies have prominent perinuclear tethers
(arrows). Note that the wall of the cyst is nonspecifically stained
with the antibodies. Bars, 2 µm. (F) Cartoon of perinuclear tethers
of microtubules which connect to microtubules in the central axis of
the parasite.
|
|
Spiral symmetry of new adherence discs.
The ventral adherence
disc of nondividing giardia contained a clockwise spiral marking, which
was visible with scanning electron microscopy (Fig.
7A). This spiral is made up in part by
acetylated tubulin, as shown by confocal microscopy of giardia, which
were also labeled on their surface with Alexa Fluor (Fig. 7B) or on their nuclei with Sytox green (Fig. 7C). During cell division, the
adherence disc of the mother disassembled, so that dividing giardia
often appeared as ovals with eight pairs of projecting flagella (not
shown). New adherence discs developed from a spiral backbone of
microtubules, which ran clockwise when viewed from the ventral surface
of the parasites. (Fig. 7D and E). Three-dimensional reconstructions of
confocal images suggested that the spirals developed from a set of
microtubules which ran along the central axis of giardia (Fig. 7F). The
adherence discs and flagella were all well formed before mother and
daughter giardia separated from each other.

View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Scanning (A) and confocal (B to E) micrographs highlight
spirals of microtubules (arrows), which underlie adherence discs. (B)
Giardia labeled red on its surface with Alexa Fluor 584 and stained
green with antibodies to acetylated tubulin. (C) Giardia stained red
with antibodies to acetylated tubulin. (D and E) Dividing giardia
labeled green on their surface with Alexa Fluor 488 and with median
bodies labeled red with monoclonal antibodies to bovine tubulin. Bars,
2 µm. (F) Cartoon shows the spiral of microtubules, which underlies
the disc and attaches to the axis of microtubules.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A more complete description of motion of flagella of adherent and
swimming giardia.
The wavelike beating of the anterior,
posterolateral, and caudal flagella was dramatically revealed when the
surfaces of giardia were labeled with the Alexa Fluor dyes
(23). As previously described (10), the
ventral flagella had a pseudosinusoidal beat, which was symmetric in
the plane of the adherence disc. Consistent with Holberton's vacuum
model of giardia adherence (10, 11), fluorescent beads
were sucked from the side of the parasite up under the adherence disc
and were shot to its caudal end. In addition, giardia adhered to
but slid along the surface of silenized slides. Three unexpected findings follow: first, all four pairs of flagella of swimming giardia
appeared to beat at about the same rate, even though the shape and/or
the plane of the beat was different for each. How the beating is
"centrally controlled" remains to be determined. Second, the tails
of giardia moved up and down in a plane perpendicular to the plane of
the adherence disc. It is likely that this movement was caused by the
caudal flagella beating synchronously together, because caudal flagella
are present throughout the entire length of the tail and because the
beating of the tail was at the same rate as the beating of the other
three pairs of flagella. Third, giardia turned by using their tail as a
rudder rather than by adjusting the stroke of the flagella. This is in
contrast to Chlamydomonas, which turns by changing the
symmetry of the beat of its two flagella, or Paramecia,
which turns by changing the stroke of its many cilia, or bacteria,
which turn by tumbling (1, 23). Because turning giardia
maintain their curved shape for a long time, it is likely that the
median body and/or funis microtubules are responsible for turning
rather than the caudal flagella.
Mirror-image hypothesis for cell division by giardia.
How
giardia replicate their nuclei and distribute them to mother and
daughter has been debated for a long time (6, 13). The
surface and cytoskeletal labels used here strongly suggest that giardia
are replicating with mirror-image symmetry in the plane of the
adherence disc. The mirror-image hypothesis was confirmed by FISH,
which showed that an episomal plasmid was present in the right nucleus
of a transfected mother giardia and the left nucleus of the daughter,
while a set of cloned giardia contained a 50:50 mixture of parasites
with episomes in the left and right nuclei. The previous models of
cytokinesis by giardia are incorrect because they predict that both
nuclei or no nuclei will contain the episomes (6) or
predict that each giardia clone will have all foreign episomes in the
left nucleus or the right nucleus but not in a 50:50 mixture of left
and right nuclei (13).
Two new cytoskeletal structures which are likely involved in
sorting nuclei of dividing giardia and building the disc.
One copy
of each nucleus is appropriately distributed to mother and daughter
giardia, because at least one pair of nuclei is bound at all times by
the perinuclear tethers, which are composed of nonacetylated
microtubules. In the absence of these tethering microtubules, 50% of
the mother and daughter giardia would be homonucleate, which might
dramatically reduce the genetic diversity of this asexual parasite
(22). The adherence discs, which are composed of
microtubules and ribbons of giardins (2, 12, 17, 18),
appear to develop on a spiral backbone of acetylated microtubules.
Although giardia generally divide with mirror-image symmetry in the
plane of the adherence disc, the spirals always turn clockwise when
discs are viewed from the ventral surface. While perinuclear tethers
and spirals appear to originate from a central axis of microtubules,
which joins the funis at its caudal end, the relationship of tethers
and spirals to each other was difficult to determine. It is likely that
future studies will reveal specific microtubule-associated proteins
which assist in the assembly of tethers and spirals in the same way
that dineins, giardins, and median body proteins direct microtubules in
flagella, the adherence disc, and the median body, respectively
(12, 15, 17, 18).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported in part by NIH grants AI-33492 (to J.S.)
and HL-33009 and 2HL-43510 (to R.R.). This work made use of the MRSEC
Shared Experimental Facilities supported by the National Science
Foundation under award number DMR98-08941.
We acknowledge the expert technical support of Jean Lai for confocal
microscopy. We thank Barbara Burleigh for help with the video
microscopy and constructive comments on the manuscript. We thank
Jennifer E. Rogers for drawings in Fig. 6F and 7F.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 432-4670. Fax:
(617) 738-4914. E-mail: jsamuels{at}hsph.harvard.edu.
Editor:
W. A. Petri Jr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bray, D.
1993.
Cell movements.
Garland Publishing, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Crossley, R.,
J. Marshall,
J. T. Clark, and D. V. Holberton.
1986.
Immunocytochemical differentiation of microtubules in the cytoskeleton of Giardia lamblia using monoclonal antibodies to alpha-tubulin and polyclonal antibodies to associated low molecular weight proteins.
J. Cell Sci.
80:233-252[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Dobell, C. A.
1920.
The discovery of the intestinal protozoa of man.
Proc. R. Soc. Med.
13:1-15.
|
| 4.
|
Erlandsen, S. L.,
P. T. Macechko,
H. van Keulen, and E. L. Jarroll.
1996.
Formation of the Giardia cyst wall: studies on extracellular assembly using immunogold labeling and high resolution field emission SEM.
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
43:416-429[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Farthing, M. J. G.,
M. E. A. Periera, and G. T. Keusch.
1986.
Description and characterization of a surface lectin from Giardia lamblia.
Infect. Immun.
51:661-667[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Filice, F. P.
1952.
Studies on the cytology and life history of a Giardia from the laboratory rat.
Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool.
57:53-143.
|
| 7.
|
Friend, D. S.
1966.
The fine structure of Giardia muris.
J. Cell Biol.
29:317-332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Gillin, F. D., and L. S. Diamond.
1980.
Clonal growth of Giardia lamblia trophozoites in a semisolid agarose medium.
J. Parasitol.
66:350-352[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Gillin, F. D.,
D. S. Reiner, and S. E. Boucher.
1988.
Small-intestinal factors promote encystation of Giardia lamblia in vitro.
Infect. Immun.
56:705-707[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Holberton, D. V.
1973.
Mechanism of attachment of Giardia to the wall of the small intestine.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
67:29-30[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Holberton, D. V.
1974.
Attachment of Giardia a hydrodynamic model based on flagellar activity.
J. Exp. Biol.
60:207-221[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Holberton, D.,
D. A. Baker, and J. Marshall.
1988.
Segmented alpha-helical coiled-coil structure of the protein giardin from the Giardia cytoskeleton.
J. Mol. Biol.
204:789-795[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kabnick, K. S., and D. A. Peattie.
1990.
In situ analyses reveal that the two nuclei of Giardia lamblia are equivalent.
J. Cell Sci.
95:353-360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Keister, D. B.
1983.
Axenic culture of Giardia lamblia in TYI-S-33 medium supplemented with bile.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
77:487-488[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Marshall, J., and D. V. Holberton.
1993.
Sequence and structure of a new coiled coil protein from a microtubule bundle in Giardia.
J. Mol. Biol.
231:521-530[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
McNeil, J. A.,
C. V. Johnson,
K. C. Carter,
R. H. Singer, and J. B. Lawrence.
1991.
Localizing DNA and RNA within nuclei and chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Genet. Anal. Tech. Appl.
8:41-58[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Nohria, A.,
R. A. Alonso, and D. A. Peattie.
1992.
Identification and characterization of gamma-giardin and the gamma-giardin gene from Giardia lamblia.
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
56:27-37[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Peattie, D. A.,
R. A. Alonso,
A. Hein, and J. P. Caulfield.
1989.
Ultrastructural localization of giardins to the edges of disk microribbons of Giardia lamblia and the nucleotide and deduced protein sequence of alpha giardin.
J. Cell Biol.
109:2323-2335[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Singer, S. M.,
J. Yee, and T. E. Nash.
1998.
Episomal and integrated maintenance of foreign DNA in Giardia lamblia.
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
92:59-69[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Soltys, B. J., and R. S. Gupta.
1994.
Immunoelectron microscopy of Giardia lamblia cytoskeleton using antibody to acetylated alpha-tubulin.
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
41:625-632[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Steiner, T. S.,
N. M. Thielman, and R. L. Guerrant.
1997.
Protozoal agents: what are the dangers for the public water supply?
Annu. Rev. Med.
48:329-340[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Tibayrenc, M.,
F. Kjellberg,
J. Arnaud,
B. Oury,
S. F. Breniere,
M.-L. Darde, and F. J. Ayala.
1991.
Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A population genetics vantage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:5129-5133[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Turner, L.,
W. S. Ryu, and H. C. Berg.
2000.
Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments.
J. Bacteriol.
182:2793-2801[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Infection and Immunity, December 2001, p. 7866-7872, Vol. 69, No. 12
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7866-7872.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Teodorovic, S., Braverman, J. M., Elmendorf, H. G.
(2007). Unusually Low Levels of Genetic Variation among Giardia lamblia Isolates. Eukaryot Cell
6: 1421-1430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sagolla, M. S., Dawson, S. C., Mancuso, J. J., Cande, W. Z.
(2006). Three-dimensional analysis of mitosis and cytokinesis in the binucleate parasite Giardia intestinalis. J. Cell Sci.
119: 4889-4900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nohynkova, E., Tumova, P., Kulda, J.
(2006). Cell Division of Giardia intestinalis: Flagellar Developmental Cycle Involves Transformation and Exchange of Flagella between Mastigonts of a Diplomonad Cell.. Eukaryot Cell
5: 753-761
[Abstract]
[Full Text]