Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, December 2001, p. 7950-7954, Vol. 69, No. 12
Department of Medicine and Epidemiology,
School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis,
California 956161; Remedyne Corporation,
Santa Barbara, California 931052;
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology,
University of California, Santa Barbara, California
931063
Received 26 June 2001/Returned for modification 4 September
2001/Accepted 21 September 2001
Salmonella DNA adenine methylase (Dam) mutants that
lack or overproduce Dam are highly attenuated for virulence in mice and confer protection against murine typhoid fever. To determine whether vaccines based on Dam are efficacious in poultry, a
Salmonella Dam Salmonellosis resulting from the
consumption of contaminated eggs and poultry meat poses a significant
public health risk to consumers worldwide. The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention has estimated that there are approximately 2 million cases of human nontyphoid salmonellosis per year in the United
States, resulting in up to 2,000 deaths (1). Most cases of
salmonellosis in developed countries are zoonotic in origin and not due
to person-to-person contamination. This disease is caused by exposure
to products contaminated with Salmonella, e.g., animal
products (such as eggs, milk, poultry), or the ingestion of food
products that have been exposed to animal feces. Economic constraints
associated with improved management of production and slaughter
facilities suggest that on-farm control of Salmonella via a
combination of antibiotics, competitive exclusion products, and/or
vaccination may be the most practical and economically feasible methods
toward reducing contamination of poultry products (34).
Such a reduction in preharvest pathogen load may provide a means for
decreasing the potential for transmission to humans.
Dam
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7950-7954.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Salmonella DNA Adenine Methylase Mutants
Elicit Protective Immune Responses to Homologous and Heterologous
Serovars in Chickens
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
vaccine was evaluated in the
protection of chicken broilers against oral challenge with homologous
and heterologous Salmonella serovars. A Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhimurium Dam
vaccine strain was
attenuated for virulence in day-of-hatch chicks more than 100,000-fold.
Vaccination of chicks elicited cross-protective immune responses, as
evidenced by reduced colonization (10- to 10,000-fold) of the
gastrointestinal tract (ileum, cecum, and feces) and visceral organs
(bursa and spleen) after challenge with homologous (Typhimurium F98)
and heterologous (Enteritidis 4973 and S. enterica
O6,14,24: e,h-monophasic) Salmonella serovars that are
implicated in Salmonella infection of poultry. The
protection conferred was observed for the organ or the maximum
CFU/tissue/bird as a unit of analysis, suggesting that Dam mutant
strains may serve as the basis for the development of efficacious
poultry vaccines for the containment of Salmonella.
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
Salmonella is attenuated for
virulence in day-of-hatch chicks.
Salmonella DNA
adenine methylase (Dam) mutants are attenuated for virulence in mice
and elicit protective (10, 16) and cross-protective
(15) immune responses against murine typhoid fever. To
examine whether Dam
Salmonella cells were
attenuated for virulence, we challenged day-of-hatch chicks with either
Dam
or Dam+ Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium UK-1 (Table
1). All chicks (15 out of 15)
survived that were infected on the day of hatch with 1010
Dam
UK-1 (MT2313) cells (Table
2). In contrast, 8 of 15 chicks
survived after challenge with 105 Dam+ UK-1
(MT2315) cells. These data indicate that a mutation in dam attenuated the virulence of serovar Typhimurium UK-1 in day-of-hatch chickens by
100,000-fold.
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and phage used in this
studya
TABLE 2.
Dam
Salmonella is attenuated for
virulence in chickensa
Immunization with Dam
Salmonella elicits
protective immunity.
To determine whether Dam
serovar Typhimurium elicited protective immune responses, chicks were
orally vaccinated with 107 CFU of Dam
Typhimurium UK-1 (MT2313) within 10 h of hatching and again at 1 week of age. Chicks were challenged at 5 weeks of age with
108 CFU of serovar Typhimurium F98 (MT2318). Vaccine
efficacy was determined by comparison of vaccinate (n = 62) and control (n = 62) quantitative cultures of
the spleen, bursa of Fabricius, ileum, cecum, and feces; cultures were
performed at 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 14 days postchallenge. The mean
log10 CFU of homologous challenge with Typhimurium F98 by
organ and day of termination for vaccinated birds relative to controls
are presented in Fig. 1A. Vaccination
with Dam
UK-1 (MT2313) resulted in
significantly lower CFU (P < 0.05) in the spleen and
feces of vaccinates on all 7 postchallenge days examined. Significantly
lower CFU in vaccinates relative to controls were observed in the bursa
on 4 out of 7 termination days, in the ileum on 5 of 7 days, and in the
cecum on 3 of 7 days.
|
103 CFU in at least one organ, compared
to 2 (3%) out of 62 controls in this category. Birds with
104 CFU in at least one organ included 46 (74%) out of
62 vaccinates compared to only 7 (11%) out of 62 controls. Taken
together, these data indicate that immunization of chicks with
Dam
serovar Typhimurium confers protection against
homologous challenge with the organ or maximum CFU/tissue/bird as the
unit of analysis.
|
Immunization of chicks with Dam
Salmonella elicits cross-protective immunity.
Next, we
examined the cross-protective capacity of chicks immunized with
Dam
Salmonella. Sixty chicks were orally
vaccinated with 107 Dam
UK-1 (MT2313) cells
within 10 h of hatching and again at 1 week of age; 60 additional
chicks remained as nonvaccinated controls. All chicks were challenged
at 5 weeks of age with either 108 CFU of serovar
Enteritidis 4973 (serogroup D; MT2314) or 109 CFU of
serovar S. enterica O6,14,24:e,h-monophasic (serogroup H;
MT2339). Figure 1B and C show the mean log10 CFU of
serovars Enteritidis 4973 and S. enterica
O6,14,24:e,h-monophasic challenge organisms by organ and day of
termination for vaccinated birds relative to nonvaccinated controls.
Six days postchallenge with serovar Enteritidis 4973 (MT2314),
vaccinates had significantly lower CFU in the spleen, bursa, cecum, and
feces: no challenge organisms were recovered from any vaccinated bird
organs, whereas 50 to 60% of control organs were positive for
Salmonella. No challenge organisms were recovered from
the spleens of vaccinates on day 6 or 7 postchallenge with
S. enterica serovar O6,14,24:e,h-monophasic (MT2339);
in contrast, salmonellae were recovered from 19 out of 20 control
spleens on these 2 days.
100
CFU in at least one organ; no control birds were in this category.
Taken together, these data indicate that chicks vaccinated with
Dam
serovar Typhimurium UK-1 elicited cross-protective
immune responses to challenge with serovars Enteritidis 4973 and
S. enterica O6,14,24:e,h-monophasic for the organ or maximum
CFU/tissue/bird as the unit of analysis.
The safety of the food supply can be compromised by large-scale animal
husbandry, agricultural methods, and distribution practices that are
prone to microbial contamination. This public health problem has been
recently exacerbated by the emergence of pathogens that are resistant
to multiple antibiotics and/or cause more debilitating forms of disease
(e.g., Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium DT104). Vaccination of
chickens offers a practical and economically feasible approach to
reducing contamination of poultry products. Here, we show that an
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium Dam
mutant was
severely attenuated for virulence in day-of-hatch chicks. Additionally,
chicks immunized with this Salmonella Dam
vaccine strain exhibit protective immune responses against homologous and heterologous Salmonella serotypes that are implicated in
Salmonella infection of poultry. Vaccines based on altered
levels of Dam activity may prove effective in controlling
Salmonella contamination of poultry, meat, and dairy
products derived from animals susceptible to Salmonella
infection and colonization.
Enumeration of salmonellae isolated from the visceral organs and
intestinal tract of vaccinated and nonvaccinated chickens challenged
with virulent serovars Typhimurium or Enteritidis or S. enterica O6,14,24:e,h-monophasic was used to determine the degree
of protection associated with vaccination. Significantly lower mean
log10 CFU were observed in visceral organs and the gastrointestinal tract of vaccinates versus nonvaccinates. Comparison of these results with challenge studies for other vaccines is problematic as the outcome of infection varies greatly with challenge strain, inoculation and immunization dose, use of multiple (booster) immunizations, the age of the birds at vaccination and challenge, statistical analysis of the data, etc. (11, 17, 18).
Previous studies using live attenuated Salmonella aroA
(11, 17, 18) and
cya
crp
mutants (12) showed reduced visceral invasion and
colonization of the gastrointestinal tract in chickens by homologous
and, to a lesser extent, heterologous challenge strains. Oral
vaccination with attenuated aroA mutants of serovar
Typhimurium (3) or Enteritidis (6, 7) reduced
fecal shedding following homologous challenge, but not heterologous
challenge (8). Vaccination with serovar Typhimurium
cya
crp conferred protection against intestinal and visceral invasion by both homologous and heterologous challenge serotypes (12). Moreover, this vaccine also
provided protection against intestinal, visceral, reproductive tract
and egg colonization by Salmonella for at least 11 months
postvaccination, with no effect on egg production (13).
Results of this study are promising in that significant protection was
observed following homologous and heterologous challenge at high
challenge doses. It should be noted that a single challenge may not
reflect the field situation wherein animals can be exposed to various
doses of several virulent serovars alone and in combination. That said,
multiple and/or continuous exposures to several serovars in the field
situation do not necessarily result in susceptibility of immunized
animals to disease: repeated exposures may contribute to the
maintenance of heightened levels of protection in vaccinated hosts.
The data presented here suggest that vaccines based on altered DNA
methylation may reduce preharvest Salmonella contamination in poultry, ultimately decreasing the potential for food-borne transmission of this pathogen to humans. DNA methylation plays a role
in the virulence of a wide variety of pathogens of the gamma
subdivision of proteobacteria, including Salmonella (murine typhoid; 10, 15), Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
(murine bacteremia; 21), and Vibrio cholerae
(cholera; 21). Additionally, DNA methylation is required
for the virulence of Brucella abortus (fetal calf abortion;
30) via CcrM, a cell-cycle regulated DNA adenine
methyltransferase present in members of the alpha group of
proteobacteria (28, 33). Since Dam and CcrM affect the virulence of such distantly related pathogens, the function of DNA
methylation in virulence may emerge as a general theme in bacterial pathogenesis.
The role of DNA methylation in virulence and the elicitation of
protective immune responses may rely on its capacity as a global
regulator of gene expression (16, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29).
Dam regulates the production of a number of adhesins in E. coli (23, 32) and Salmonella
(27), as well as several genes required for
Salmonella infection (14, 16). Such ectopic gene expression may result in the production of an expanded repertoire of antigens that contribute to the heightened immunity seen in vaccinated animals (15, 16, 21). Thus, dysregulation of Dam activity may be a means to elicit protective immune responses directed against diverse pathogens that infect a wide variety of animal
hosts (24, 25).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Steve Julio for critically reviewing the manuscript.
This work was supported by USDA grant 2000-02539 (to J.K.H and M.J.M.), a grant from Remedyne Corporation (to J.K.H.), private donations from Jim and Deanna Dehlsen, the Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Research Program (to M.J.M.), and a postdoctoral grant from the Cancer Center of Santa Barbara (to D.M.H.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Phone: (530) 752-7407. Fax: (530) 752-0414. E-mail: eldueger{at}ucdavis.edu.
Editor: D. L. Burns
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Altekruse, S. F., M. L. Cohen, and D. L. Swerdlow. 1997. Emerging food borne diseases. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3:285-293[Medline]. |
| 2. | Barrow, P. A., H. W. Smith, and J. F. Tucker. 1984. The effect of feeding diets containing avopracin on the excretion of Salmonella by chickens experimentally infected with natural sources of Salmonella organisms. J. Hyg. 93:439-444. |
| 3. | Barrow, P. A., J. O. Hassan, and A. Berchieri, Jr. 1990. Reduction in faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium strain F98 in chickens vaccinated with live and killed S. typhimurium organisms. Epidemiol. Infect. 104:413-426[Medline]. |
| 4. | Chan, R. K., D. Botstein, T. Watanabe, and Y. Ogata. 1972. Specialized transduction of tetracycline resistance by phage P22 in Salmonella typhimurium. II. Properties of a high-frequency-transducing lysate. Virology 50:883-898[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Conner, C. P.,
D. M. Heithoff,
S. M. Julio,
R. L. Sinsheimer, and M. J. Mahan.
1998.
Differential patterns of acquired virulence genes distinguish Salmonella strains.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:4641-4645 |
| 6. | Cooper, G. L., L. M. Venables, R. A. Nicholas, G. A. Cullen, and C. E. Hormaeche. 1992. Vaccination of chickens with chicken-derived Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4 aroA live oral Salmonella vaccines. Vaccine 10:247-254[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. | Cooper, G. L., L. M. Venables, R. A. Nicholas, G. A. Cullen, and C. E. Hormaeche. 1993. Further studies of the application of live Salmonella enteritidis aroA vaccines in chickens. Vet. Rec. 133:31-36[Abstract]. |
| 8. |
Cooper, G. L.,
L. M. Venables,
M. J. Woodward, and C. E. Hormaeche.
1994.
Vaccination of chickens with strain CVL30, a genetically defined Salmonella enteritidis aroA live oral vaccine candidate.
Infect. Immun.
62:4747-4754 |
| 9. | Davis, R. W., D. Botstein, and J. R. Roth. 1980. Advanced bacterial genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y. |
| 10. |
Garcia-Del Portillo, F.,
M. G. Pucciarelli, and J. Casadesus.
1999.
DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium show defects in protein secretion, cell invasion, and M cell cytotoxicity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:11578-11583 |
| 11. | Harrison, J. A., B. Villarreal-Ramos, P. Mastroeni, R. Demarco de Hormaeche, and C. E. Hormaeche. 1997. Correlates of protection induced by live Aro-Salmonella typhimurium vaccines in the murine typhoid model. Immunology 90:618-625[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Hassan, J. O., and R. Curtiss, III.
1994.
Development and evaluation of an experimental vaccination program using a live avirulent Salmonella typhimurium strain to protect immunized chickens against challenge with homologous and heterologous Salmonella serotypes.
Infect. Immun.
62:5519-5527 |
| 13. | Hassan, J. O., and R. Curtiss, III. 1997. Efficacy of a live avirulent Salmonella typhimurium vaccine in preventing colonization and invasion of laying hens by Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis. Avian Dis. 41:783-791[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Heithoff, D. M.,
C. P. Conner,
P. C. Hanna,
S. M. Julio,
U. Hentschel, and M. J. Mahan.
1997.
Bacterial infection as assessed by in vivo gene expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:934-939 |
| 15. |
Heithoff, D. M.,
E. Y. Enioutina,
R. A. Daynes,
R. L. Sinsheimer,
D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan.
2001.
Salmonella DNA adenine methylase mutants confer cross-protective immunity.
Infect. Immun.
69:6725-6730 |
| 16. |
Heithoff, D. M.,
R. L. Sinsheimer,
D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan.
1999.
An essential role for DNA adenine methylation in bacterial virulence.
Science
284:967-970 |
| 17. | Hormaeche, C. E., H. S. Joysey, L. Desilva, M. Izhar, and B. A. D. Stocker. 1991. Immunity conferred by AroA- Salmonella live vaccines. Microb. Pathog. 10:149-158[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Hormaeche, C. E., P. Mastroeni, J. A. Harrison, R. Demarco de Hormaeche, S. Svenson, and B. A. D. Stocker. 1996. Protection against oral challenge three months after i.v. immunization of BALB/c mice with live Aro Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis vaccines is serotype (species)-dependent and only partially determined by the main LPS O antigen. Vaccine 14:251-259[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Jones, F., R. C. Axtell, F. R. Tarver, D. V. Rives, S. E. Scheideler, and M. J. Wineland. 1991. Experimental factors contributing to Salmonella colonization of chickens, p. 3-21. In L. C. Blankenship, J. S. Bailey, N. A. Cox, N. J. Stern, and R. J. Meinersmann (ed.), Colonization control of human bacterial enteropathogens in poultry. Academy Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 20. | Julio, S. M., C. P. Conner, D. M. Heithoff, and M. J. Mahan. 1998. Directed formation of chromosomal deletions in Salmonella typhimurium: targeting of specific genes induced during infection. Mol. Gen. Genet. 258:178-181[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Julio, S. M.,
D. M. Heithoff,
D. Provenzano,
K. E. Klose,
R. L. Sinsheimer,
D. A. Low, and M. J. Mahan.
2001.
DNA adenine methylase is essential for viability and plays a role in the pathogenesis of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Vibrio cholerae.
Infect. Immun.
69:7610-7615 |
| 22. |
Kahng, L. S., and L. Shapiro.
2001.
The CcrM DNA methyltransferase of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is essential, and its activity is cell cycle regulated.
J. Bacteriol.
183:3065-3075 |
| 23. | Krabbe, M., N. Weyand, and D. Low. 2000. Environmental control of pilus gene expression, p. 305-321. In G. Storz, and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 24. |
Low, D. A.,
N. J. Weyand, and M. J. Mahan.
2001.
The roles of DNA methylation in the control of bacterial gene expression and virulence.
Infect. Immun.
69:7197-7204 |
| 25. | Mahan, M. J., and D. A. Low. 2001. DNA methylation regulates bacterial gene expression and virulence. ASM News 67:1-7. |
| 26. | Marinus, M. G. 1996. Methylation of DNA, p. 782-791. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. |
| 27. | Nicholson, B., and D. A. Low. 2000. DNA methylation-dependent regulation of pef expression in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 35:728-742[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Reisenauer, A.,
L. S. Kahng,
S. McCollum, and L. Shapiro.
1999.
Bacterial DNA methylation: a cell cycle regulator?
J. Bacteriol.
181:5135-5139 |
| 29. |
Reisenauer, A.,
K. Quon, and L. Shapiro.
1999.
The CtrA response regulator mediates temporal control of gene expression during the Caulobacter cell cycle.
J. Bacteriol.
181:2430-2439 |
| 30. |
Robertson, G. T.,
A. Reisenauer,
R. Wright,
R. B. Jensen,
A. Jensen,
L. Shapiro, and R. M. Roop, II.
2000.
The Brucella abortus CcrM DNA methyltransferase is essential for viability, and its overexpression attenuates intracellular replication in murine macrophages.
J. Bacteriol.
182:3482-3489 |
| 31. | Schmeiger, H. 1972. Phage P22-mutants with increased or decreased transduction abilities. Mol. Gen. Genet. 119:75-88[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | van der Woude, M., B. Braaten, and D. Low. 1996. Epigenetic phase variation of the pap operon in Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol. 4:5-9[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. |
Wright, R.,
C. Stephens, and L. Shapiro.
1997.
The CcrM DNA methyltransferase is widespread in the alpha subdivision of proteobacteria, and its essential functions are conserved in Rhizobium meliloti and Caulobacter crescentus.
J. Bacteriol.
179:5869-5877 |
| 34. | Zhang-Barber, L., A. K. Turner, and P. A. Barrow. 1999. Vaccination for control of Salmonella in poultry. Vaccine 17:2538-2545[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|